[HN Gopher] America's Obsession with Self-Help ___________________________________________________________________ America's Obsession with Self-Help Author : pepys Score : 87 points Date : 2021-07-05 20:14 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (newrepublic.com) (TXT) w3m dump (newrepublic.com) | war1025 wrote: | I gravitate towards self help because expert help has almost | always resulted in very large expenses and my actual problem not | being solved. | | Every experience I've had with a doctor that was less severe than | "I am actively dying" has just been "Take pain killers for a | couple weeks and come back if it isn't fixed by then, also here | is a $200 bill." | | The one time I hired someone to fix something on my house (to fix | some water damage), I had a literal stream of water coming in to | my house above the repair the next time it rained. | | In most cases, it seems you need to know the answer to the | problem yourself before you can trust someone else to diagnose | and fix the problem correctly. | sixothree wrote: | My experience with doctors is not too different from yours. I | had been experiencing sinus pain debilitating enough to affect | work. I was referred to a doctor who was an hour late, whose | only actual advice was use saline solution, and then charged me | $150 (deductible not yet met). | | I've been using "concierge" medicine ever since. | rajin444 wrote: | Most of us work in a profession where we hire teams of people | to maintain systems with a fraction of the complexity of the | human body (not to mention our understanding of how computers | work is orders of magnitude higher than our understanding of | the body). Contrast that with a doctor seeing a patient for the | first time. | deregulateMed wrote: | Ahhh the good ol "Medicine is Art and Science". | | How many people have died because we keep letting physicians | tell us this? | | I'm pro Evidence Based Medicine, but physicians can't buy | mansions if the medicine can be discussed by scientists. | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote: | Alright, now explain why I should pay them $200 (or more) for | a half-hour consultation where they parrot something google | could have told me and fill out a form in Epic? | | I'm with parent, unless you have a lot of time and money to | spend, or an obvious problem like a broken leg, doctors | aren't worth very much. | deckard1 wrote: | > they parrot something google could have told me | | anecdote time... went to the doctor once about an issue. | She started typing into the computer. I caught a glimpse | and she was literally scrolling through a Google image | search, looking for a match. | | That's the catch-22 with professional help. You need to | hire a lawyer to help keep you out of trouble or solve your | business problems. But since you're not a lawyer yourself, | you can't judge the quality of the work. You're at the | mercy of Yelp-like reputation systems or, possibly worse, | recommendations from friends and people you know. | SllX wrote: | Heh. That Google Image search was probably a substitute | for some chart already in the office, possibly gathering | dust. | deckard1 wrote: | hopefully that. Because I shudder to think that some | doctor is going to take Google's results at face value. | It's the Gell-Mann Amnesia. Every once in awhile I see | one of those Google instant answer boxes on a search that | I know is total BS. But then I go and pretend like the | next dozen searches I do are perfectly reasonable | results. | Jtsummers wrote: | I always enjoy the ones that read something like: | What is a normal weight for a house cat? 150lbs | <expand> "Is it normal for my house cat to weigh | 150lbs? No, says every vet ever." | | I've found that on more than one occasion so I just | started ignoring it. I really need to switch the default | search engine on the rest of my devices to DDG. Google is | not very useful anymore. | SllX wrote: | I think it's a fair bet. | | Cards on the table, I've had shingles twice. If you want | to get technical about it, I will always have the virus | that causes it, but it will not always be able to break | through. | | First outbreak, didn't know what it was, it was in a part | of my neck and shoulder I couldn't see and based off feel | and texture, I figured "eh, Hives", and treated it as | such. So the shingles progressed, and you definitely | don't want that, until I felt physically compelled to go | see a doctor ASAP. | | One look, with no reference material, no image searches, | no charts, the Doctor instantly knew what it was and | didn't bullshit me about my age. Wrote me an antiviral | prescription and I was out the door. | | Second time, shingles being one of the circles of hell, I | figure it out before it progresses, and this time I go to | a an urgent care clinic because I don't need a diagnoses, | I need a prescription vending machine. Young guy walks | in, quite a bit less experienced, I all but tell him | exactly what I'm there for, and he's a bit unsure because | of my age, but he walks into another room, looks at a | chart, and vends me my prescription. If not for a chart | on the wall and my prior and convincing experience, he | would have wanted a blood test. | | Now I'm sure the latter is a fine doctor with a few more | years under his belt now, and can reference this event in | his own mind the next time he's feeling skeptical, but | sometimes being a doctor is just having the experience to | know what's up, and knowing that maybe it's been too long | since med school and maybe you should cross reference it | from somewhere, or ask a colleague. And some doctors | don't need to look at anything at all, and can pronounce | a diagnoses on the spot. | | I looked at the chart, it just showed the different | patterns of different skin conditions, and these weren't | photos but illustrations. Couldn't tell you if that's | better or worse than Google Images, but I wished I didn't | have to go to a Doctor in the first place to ask | permission to buy the same antivirals I used before. | michaelmrose wrote: | Imagine if someone said I pay that guy 100k a year and I | peeked at his computer and all he was doing was looking | up the problem on Google and typing in a text editor! | | It's not the typing or the Google search anyone is paying | for they are paying for the usage of the highly trained | brain that can evaluate what they are reading in the | context of the hard earned skills and information | possesses by the reader. | | On the topic of the doctors I wonder how it would work | out if we combined anonymous analysis of doctors work by | other doctors with patients. | lostdog wrote: | I'm more worried when the doctor is too lazy to even do a | Google search. Having an expert do a web search is a | decent way to filter out bad results and find a | reasonable answer quickly. | kube-system wrote: | The same reason that people pay me $200 to parrot some | javascript that google could have told them. | | The availability of reference material doesn't give you | expertise, context, trained judgement, etc. The value that | an expert provides is not in their ability to memorize | facts and regurgitate them. | BeetleB wrote: | I'm not anti-doctor or anything, and see one as often as | I can. However, I do sympathize with his point - | especially when it comes to pain. Having had lots of pain | problems at different points in my life, the response has | _always_ been "more painkillers". Only a few doctors, | with some push back, recommended physical therapy (which | didn't always work, but was more effective than | painkillers). | kube-system wrote: | I think that's just a result of most people having the | tendency to approach problems the way that most customers | want or expect them to. The same stuff happens in | software development and plenty of other jobs too. | michaelmrose wrote: | Regular checkups can catch developing problems while its | still possible to do something constructive about them. | | If you aren't receiving an annual check up AND don't have a | problem more complicated than you can google indeed you | shouldn't waste your money and both of your time. What is | within the individuals ability to understand is going to | vary widely. | | Your health insurance wont pay for expensive tests or | treatments based on your say so because if they did people | less intelligent and more paranoid than yourselves would | order the moon based on what they found on webmd. | swiley wrote: | Trusting other people to administrate your home computer is | totally ok though because they're actually experts. | truffdog wrote: | That is the Kaseya business model. | potatoman22 wrote: | Conversely, sometimes you need that outside expert perspective | to help open your eyes to the real problems. | war1025 wrote: | And that's the real rub of it. | | I don't know what I don't know, but I also don't know where | to get that knowledge, so a reasonable first step is to | investigate the people pushing "self-help" methods. | | From there you can often learn the right keywords to get a | foot in the door with someone knowledgeable and have them | actually tell you something useful rather than just taking | your money and sending you on your way. | guilhas wrote: | Most important take is people want help | | Maybe don't know how to get it, don't have money, feel ashamed... | | Society needs help and reform | rednerrus wrote: | Many Americans don't have communities to fall back on. I was | raised by a single mother 6000 miles from her family. We didn't | have family or community to rely on. I was alone a lot as a | child. As such I didn't get all of the socialization that many | people got. I like to think of it like growing up without hearing | language. I didn't get it as a part of my upbringing. I had to | seek it out and learn it, in the same way you would a language. | | In the beginning I didn't have the tools to seek it out with | other human beings. I didn't speak the basic "language". I feel | incredibly fortunate that there were books out there that I had | access to that helped with where to start. Simple things like how | to ask for help. Eventually (20 something years later) I have | enough "language" in my vocabulary, thanks in great part to | amazing books written by incredible writers who have devoted | their lives to helping other people, to navigate a complex social | life. I am incredibly grateful to these authors. | | This is an issue plaguing Americans. There are threads everyday | on Reddit and the like with people asking questions like "How do | I make friends?" and "How do I get involved in a community?". | We're an incredibly lonely society. | ddingus wrote: | Actually getting help is often associated with high costs, risks | and stigmas of various kinds. | | Obsession? | | Hardly. | rednerrus wrote: | This is why self-help books are so important. You can figure | out the issue, make a plan, and get started in the comfort and | safety of your home for the price of a library card. | ddingus wrote: | I consider that dark humor. | Broken_Hippo wrote: | That's if you can even find help. There are many times it is | lacking completely. | ddingus wrote: | Agreed. | jbrun wrote: | As a Canadian and a French citizen, America definitely has this | puritan streak of trying to be the best person you can be - or | the purest you can be. Work harder, drink less, exercise more, | etc. | | My French grandparents lived until they were 100, were perfectly | content, had 8 kids, ate great food during long meals and drank | lots of wine. I don't think they jogged a day in their lives. | deregulateMed wrote: | You mentioned hedonism and an accomplishment... Having 8 kids. | | While I love my kids, I don't consider it an achievement. | | And hedonism seems great until you climb the hedonic treadmill. | Your claim of the "content" life leaves lots to disect. | iseethroughbs wrote: | Americans jog, and then have a meal that is 20 different ways | to process the same corn into various food-like substances. | [deleted] | swiley wrote: | Coincidentally I think the best self help book I've read was | written by a Canadian. Maybe it's because he had the rest of | the culture to contrast his ideas against. | dqpb wrote: | American self-help isn't about the simple practical things like | jogging. | | It's more about motivational-life-coach-metaphysical-wealth- | manifestation-secrets. | bitwize wrote: | In other words, multi level marketing indoctrination memes. | It's why I avoid self-help, especially the slick charismatic | gurus like Tony Robbins, and the "positive thinking" movement | altogether. | dominotw wrote: | > I don't think they jogged a day in their lives. | | i don't think they were sitting all day eating highly processed | food either. | markbeare wrote: | Exactly | lumost wrote: | It is curious why we haven't figured out the difference | between a "healthy" french/mediterranean/home cooked meal and | a tv dinner yet. | | Obviously something gets lost in the macro nutrients/vitamin | content - but I don't think I've seen a formal study of why | they are different. | rusk wrote: | I don't think the accepted wisdom is that pre packaged | meals are bad vs what you cook yourself it's the quality | that matters. It processed foods vs non processed foods. | You can get posh TV dinners that are good for you but you | pay for them. The cheaper stuff manufactured at scale is | almost certainly going to be using cheaper/substituted | ingredients because that's just how business works. You're | going to be missing the macros you mentioned, as well as | fibre and you'll be taking on a lot of dodgy fats and | sugars and typically many other additives used to flavour | and preserve the food. What you get with home cooked | dinners is control over your ingredients. Of course you | could just eat ketchup and chips and you're not going to be | seeing a benefit but it's hard to go wrong with rice, fish | and a few vegetables for example. | | There's various other confounding factors such as how and | when you eat, and ultimately your relationship with food. | | There is plenty of research linking processed food with | health risks. | vorpalhex wrote: | I think you are correct here in terms of the base | argument but wrong for the origin. | | You don't make food cheaper by reducing the quality of | ingrediants since decent ingredients are still really | cheap. You make food cheaper by making it more preserved. | | A lot of food cost is in waste and spoilage. Cheap foods | are typically things that handle well and don't perish | easily. | | You accomplish this by adding more fat, more salt, and | heavily processing food. You strip all the bacteria and | cultures from it and you can get a tv dinner to last a | decade if it's packaged well. | | On the other hand, gourmet food is all prone to spoilage. | Squeaky cheese curds, fresh pasta, homemade tortillas, | etc. | handrous wrote: | Portions are the #1 culprit as far as food goes, I'd say. | There may be a bunch of other factors, but I'd expect that | they're secondary to that. | | I'm also very curious how much better US health would be if | we could wave a magic wand and replace all sugary drinks | with water. 64oz of sugar-water with a meal is a _lot_ , | but not uncommon thanks to free refills and helpful waiters | always topping everyone off. Lots of people have way more | than that on an average day, too. I'm sure it wouldn't fix | (anywhere near) everything, but I bet that single factor is | an awful lot of the cause of dietary-related illness rate | differences between the US and other countries. The others | have soda too, but it doesn't flow as freely and cheaply as | here[0], and enormous cups/bottles of the stuff multiple | times a day isn't common most places. | | [0] With some exceptions--I understand Mexico, for example, | consumes lots of sugary soda. | tyjaksn wrote: | I would add that the ease with which we can access food | is also a main culprit. | handrous wrote: | Right--I suspect one factor is that we have/had a weaker | and looser food-culture than many countries, which fact | has been exploited by companies to wedge food (so, food | sales) into more situations and parts of our day, badly | eroding whatever weak norms there had been. | | Way, way more stores having very late or even 24/7 hours | than before has probably further disrupted any norms and | culture we had about when & where to eat--not just for | the shoppers who have those wares available more hours of | the day, but I'm thinking especially of the workers-- | believe it or not, young'uns, but as recently as the | early 2000s almost everything in the US but certain | districts of major cities were shut down and _dead_ by a | reasonable hour. | | Another, possibly minor factor: I have a _suspicion_ we | have more waking hours per day, on average, than | Americans did 50 years ago. You can 't eat (snack) when | you're sleeping, even if food's available. | lumost wrote: | If portions are the problem then processed food should be | fine, why is it that processed food always comes in | larger portions? | | Why do consumers often think that the smaller portion is | more filling when eating a properly proportioned french | meal than the equivalent calories from McDonalds? | handrous wrote: | Guesses: | | Some of it's food culture. Giant portions are normal so | you don't think twice about piling your plate high. Norms | (and, yes, judgement/shaming) about consumption affect | patterns of same. Snacking, even heavy snacking, between | meals, is common. This may be suppressed elsewhere by | stronger "you eat at meal times--if not exclusively, then | nearly so" norms, and snack-availability that's about | what you'd expect, given those norms. | | Some people think our commonly-accessible "good" food | (fruits, veggies, not from specialty stores, just the | main produce section of normal grocery stores) are a lot | worse than what's normal in some other, healthier | countries. I don't have enough experience to claim | anything definitive on this, but what experience I do | have does support it. If "good" food doesn't taste as | good as elsewhere, or if getting something as good as | others' normal produce requires special shopping and much | higher prices, maybe one tends to reach for umami-bomb | fat+starch garbage, which is both kinda-addictive and not | very filling. | | A lot of our standard cooking is tied up heavily with | giant portions. We even seem to do this with imported | cuisines, for whatever reason. Not-especially-good food | in giant portions. Heaping plates of mediocre pasta+sauce | as our image of Italian food, Mexican food with | bottomless chips & salsa (and huge, cheese-slathered | plates for the entrees), that kind of thing. I guess | that's more of the food-culture thing. | | I doubt any of these are all of the reason, and maybe | none of them are correct at all. | KptMarchewa wrote: | Because it is. It's relatively easy to consume 2000 | calories in one sitting in McD, while few people have the | stomach to stomach the same amount of calories in salad, | without sugary drinks. | vorpalhex wrote: | There is a theory (and I want to stress that it's theory, | not fact) that many processed foods may not trigger our | indicators of satiety. Some foods trigger satiety better | than others, and we have pretty good evidence that a lot | of sugars don't cause satiety. | | On the other hand, foods like rice, potatoes, etc do. | | [1] https://www.webmd.com/diet/features/satiety-new-diet- | weapon (soft ref, appropriate grain of salt) | | [2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27125637/ | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote: | I am not operating off any data here, and as far as I can | tell neither are you so that seems fair, but it is quite | possible that our conception of what is "filling" or | "satisfying" is intrinsically tied to the cost of the | meal. Processed food and fast food are cheaper and we | know it, so if we get less of it, it is possible that | that fact alone makes it less satisfying. | handrous wrote: | > Processed food and fast food are cheaper and we know | it, so if we get less of it, it is possible that that | fact alone makes it less satisfying. | | Food pricing, especially at chain restaurants and fast- | food joints, tends to support this. It's not uncommon to | pay 20% more for double the food, either because larger | sizes aren't much more expensive than smaller ones, or | thanks to "combo" meals. Restaurants seem to be | optimizing for total sales, not margin on individual | items, based on how they price--in many cases their | entire menu seems to exist only to make the "combo meal" | look like a good deal, but of course it may be more food | than you _really_ wanted. | | To say nothing of the phenomenon of all-you-can-eat | buffets... | 908B64B197 wrote: | Traditional French food (and furthermore, cuisine from | Quebec and Louisiana) is far from healthy. | munk-a wrote: | The traditional french cuisine of Quebec was eaten by | folks that regularly canoed hundreds of miles up and down | rivers so they had an immense amount of physical activity | to counter that out - an amount quite beyond what you'll | get sitting at a desk job these days. | Broken_Hippo wrote: | Sure. But it was also eaten by folks that stayed home all | day. By store clerks and children and school teachers and | grandparents and other normal, every day folks. Other | folks on different traditional diets worked hard too. | [deleted] | adolph wrote: | > "healthy" french/mediterranean/home cooked meal and a tv | dinner | | Opportunity knocking, are you listening? | munk-a wrote: | TV Dinners are absolutely loaded with salt, sugar and hard | fats so they taste good while being frozen. If I cook a | delicious meal and then chuck it into the freezer for three | months it will taste like crap because freezing is not an | effective method to preserve taste and texture, to make it | palatable after an extended period of time I need to add | flavour enhancers like sugar (it's addictive and works on | anything), sodium (it enhances flavours directly and salt | is a common craving) and hard fats (ones that won't break | down as quickly when frozen. | | I think America really has figured out the difference and | that information is pretty easily accessible - but if | you're working twelve hours then you'll grab the five | dollar TV dinner and just ignore the downsides. | newfriend wrote: | That's great for them. Is there something wrong with trying to | be the best person you can be? Is a life of leisure and | hedonism something to be celebrated, while a life of striving | to achieve is looked down upon? | | I think this is part of the reason the US has been so | successful and innovative. Hard work and improvement are seen | as virtues here. A life of sloth and mediocrity, avoiding work | and relying on the government to provide for you was not seen | as something good until recently. I hope the essence of America | isn't lost forever: industry, innovation, and individualism. | jbrun wrote: | America is built mostly on immigrant work ethic, vast amount | of arable land, no bordering enemies and the collapse of the | european powers. Not sure america is that special, just lucky | - right place, right time. | | https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-under- | pressu... | newfriend wrote: | Forgive me if I don't care about an opinion piece by | someone who hates America. | | > America is built mostly on immigrant work ethic | | Isn't it interesting how many believe the US was solely | built by immigrants, slaves, and natives. I wonder what | American citizens did during this time? | | > the collapse of the european powers | | The US was already inventing and building in the 1800s, no | collapse needed. | | > Not sure america is that special, just lucky - right | place, right time. | | It's easy to ascribe luck to anything successful. You could | say Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, etc were | nothing special, just lucky - right place, right time, but | I don't think that's true. | bachmeier wrote: | > America definitely has this puritan streak of trying to be | the best person you can be - or the purest you can be. Work | harder, drink less, exercise more, etc. | | That might describe some parts of America, but it's definitely | not universal. The German immigrants that formed the generation | before me were drinking more and exercising less. They were | also farmers, so they didn't need to exercise. | | I would argue that it's the heavy influence of immigrants from | all over the world that caused the self-help obsession. Those | who came here weren't a random sample from their home | countries. Immigration was itself a form of self-help. | jbrun wrote: | Yeah, probably true. My background is Jewish European and | there is an obvious streak of self-improvement in that | culture (or at least, there used to be....) | Baeocystin wrote: | It's been known for a long time that immigrants in the US | perform better across most every metric than the native | population. | | Sometimes this is seen by policy-makers as indicative of a | problem with the native population. Sometimes this is cast as | immigrants taking over. | | The reality is rather straightforward, imo. The type of | person willing and able to uproot themselves from their | parent culture and set their sails for new opportunity is a | _huge_ selection event, in and of itself. It 's no wonder | that the most driven percentage of humanity turns out to be | the most successful. | | (This is also why I think the US would only benefit from much | less restrictive immigration policy, but that is a discussion | for another thread.) | perardi wrote: | _As a Canadian and a French citizen_ | | If I may hazard a guess: Quebecois? | | I lived in Toronto for a few years, with the occasional trip to | Montreal. I definitely noticed a cultural difference between | the provinces--Quebec was rather less stressed out, whereas | Ontario is just as tight-assed Protestant as the Midwest. | _(Maybe more so. Can't buy wine at a grocery store? Raw uncut | Calvinism.)_ | frosted-flakes wrote: | You can buy most types of alcohol at grocery stores now. You | have always been able to buy wine at some grocery stores like | Zehrs or Loblaws, though it was in a separate store-within-a- | store. LCBO and The Beer Store no longer have a duopoly on | alcohol sales, but I think it was just fine when they did. | randomdata wrote: | Brewers Retail was a reasonable solution coming out of | prohibition when it was jointly owned by all of Ontario's | brewers, balancing their needs with the needs of consumers | along with the needs of those still worried about the end | of prohibition. However, it should have only been | considered a short-term solution. | | By the time mergers and acquisitions left it to be owned | completely by foreign interests, all while Ontario's | emerging craft beer scene were prohibited from inclusion, | there was absolutely no excuse for it anymore. How the 2015 | Master Framework Agreement got signed continues to boggle | the mind. | | Rural Ontario has allowed the sale of alcohol (all kinds) | in grocery and corner stores since the 1960s. It is amazing | how slow the rest of the province is to catch up. It took | until the _year 2000_ for Toronto to fully let go of being | dry. | sparrc wrote: | I guess, but that's just your personal anecdote largely based | on your grandparents genetics and the fact that they probably | weren't exceedingly overweight. | | My (100% American) grandpa also lived to 100...he also never | exercised and even smoked for 20 years or so. He ate whatever | he wanted but didn't over-eat candy and snacks, which I think | is the main issue lots of people have. | throwaway675309 wrote: | Genetics are a powerful thing. Trying to be actively healthy is | playing a statistical game, not all of us have the magical | genetic sequences to somehow live to 100 in perfect health | while drinking copious amounts of wine. | | Furthermore some of us exercise not just for the sake of it, we | do it to enable us to become better at activities that we | enjoy. I enjoy being able to track my measurable improvement at | sports such as tennis and badminton as a result of my going to | the gym and work on high intensity interval training, | anaerobics, etc. | neogodless wrote: | While I doubt my experience is even remotely unique, a variety of | experiences (and perhaps genetics) from my childhood, teens, etc. | left me in my 20s as an outgoing but (very) insecure person. I | was constantly seeking but failing at relationships. I had | dropped out of college, and was flighty and inconsistent with my | career. | | Maybe I'd come out of all that just by time passing / aging... | but I decided to read about the things I was failing to | accomplish. Having a self-identity and the integrity to maintain | my identity when faced with challenges. Understanding boundaries | in relationships. Learning how to accomplish tasks at work and | succeed in projects. | | I suspect a combination of the bad experiences, surviving them, | learning from mistakes _and_ the things I learned from books all | contributed to an overall more capable person. I gained | confidence, stability in relationships, greater diligence and | sense of responsibility at work. Not everything is sunshine and | roses. There 's still a long list of projects I dreamed of or | started, but failed or abandoned. But the list of people that | seem to trust me and seek me out for "adult" advice has grown. | | In many ways, I am not the picture of American success, but I am | happy with what I've done with myself, with the potential I've | tapped, the relationships I've built, and so on. I think of | myself as leaning towards the side of being discontent with | unpleasant circumstances that I'm capable of changing. There's | plenty that's bigger that I might not be happy about, but by | having a clear picture of your locus of control, the gist of the | Serenity Prayer applies. And improving your self is top of the | list of things you can change. | [deleted] | civilized wrote: | This is a common type of HN thread where the linked article is | pretty bad, but the headline topic is interesting enough that | people want to comment on it from their own experience. In this | case, every single comment (100% as of this posting) is a riff on | the headline topic and says nothing at all about the content of | the article. | | Well, I will say one thing about the article. It summarily | dismisses Stephen Covey's Seven Habits as nothing special, | without engaging the content of the book in the slightest, and | criticizes Covey for not talking about racism and sexism. If you | want this article and its writer in a nutshell, there you go. | | There are a ton of articles like this out there, even on this | exact topic of ridiculing self-help from the compulsive, | perfunctory woke standpoint that dominates our elite media | culture. This one was very middle-of-the-fairway. The best I can | say about it is that it contained a tiny bit of history, and we | were spared the usual exhortations to adopt more collectivist | politics. (In their prescriptions for America, the writers always | talk exclusively about politics, never even thinking about what | people could be doing differently in their own families, | friendships, neighborhoods and communities. Slaves to | individualism in their own way, they would never imagine that | anything but the State can save us.) | | Frankly, these dull, robotically woke articles from legacy media | are a much more nauseating aspect of this cultural moment than | bad self-help books. And Seven Habits is more worth your time | than anything this author will ever say. | TrispusAttucks wrote: | Agreed. These articles are becoming a formulaic bad trope. | | 1. Grab some classic American media. | | 2. Look at it through a perverted lens it wasn't meant to | address. | | 3. Decry this lack of coverage as some evil ploy to suppress an | outgroup. | | Seven habits is a great book that anyone would be better for | having read. | recursivedoubts wrote: | America, in contrast with most other countries, has very little | cultural infrastructure to guide people. Freedom and | individualism (however shallow) is emphasized. | | To quote an american catholic saying something very uncatholic, | but very american: "At the heart of liberty is the right to | define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the | universe and the mystery of human life." | | We should not be surprised that into this psychic vacuum rushes | various alternatives such as self-help, sports-worship and so | forth. | sakopov wrote: | > America, in contrast with most other countries, has very | little cultural infrastructure to guide people. Freedom and | individualism (however shallow) is emphasized. | | Very true. I went to a public school in Eastern Europe and | everyone had to go through the same curriculum no matter what | you wanted to focus on after graduation. The basic principle | here is to expose students to all subjects and let them decide | what they want to focus on in places of higher education. | | However, in American schools it seemed that you could pretty | much weave your way through public schools only taking courses | you think you need after you cover some of the basic subjects. | There are several problems with this approach. First of all, | you're never exposed to subjects that you didn't originally | have interest in, but could potentially have appreciation for | had you invested some time learning about them. Secondly, your | scope of knowledge ends up being pretty narrowly limited to | things that you're interested in while having little to no idea | about everything else. Lastly, I think colleges and | universities end up picking up the slack here when they start | teaching coursework that should've otherwise been part of | public school curriculum. | | All-in-all, it is my belief that having at least surface-level | understanding in various subjects does make a difference as you | get older because it gives you just enough knowledge to be able | to look at life in a different light and, at the very least, | have a general idea how to start making adjustments. Not to say | that you won't need help. In fact, you still might but you're | in a much better place than where you would be blindly | following someone's advice in a gimmicky self-help book. | azinman2 wrote: | I don't think you have an accurate account of American | education. Often times there is some level of freedom in high | school, but undoubtedly one is forced to take classes from | most disciplines. I think what changes is often the | advancement one gets to (some might take Calculus, others | stop at pre-Calculus or even trigonometry). But I don't think | there are many high schools where one stops taking math, | science, humanities, etc at all possibly with the exception | of the last year. Similarly, most colleges have broad | requirements beyond your major. I had to take many classes in | humanities, physical, math, sociology, and other areas, for | example, even though I was a cognitive science major. My | understanding is that this is actually more broad than | typical universities in Europe where one only focuses on | their area (or certainly at least medical school is that way | in many European countries). | dfinninger wrote: | That hasn't been my experience in American schools, nor | anyone that I've discussed the topic with. | | In my final year of High School education I had some freedom, | but it was along the lines of, "You have access to advanced | Biology, Physics, and English. Choose two." (It was more | complicated than this, simplified for example's sake) | | For the rest of high school I had one elective course and the | rest was more rigid. I was able to choose which foreign | language I would like to study and I could choose a | particular artistic pursuit. Everything else was thoroughly | constructed and regimented. Arts, Humanities, Sciences, | Mathematics, Language were required each year. | | Even when I went to college, the first two semesters required | the same mix of curriculum before I was able to specialize. | FredPret wrote: | Sports-worship is a strong feature of many religious and | traditional nations as well. Think of European football fans, | among many other examples. | timoth3y wrote: | > Freedom and individualism (however shallow) is emphasized. | | It's really not though. | | By Western standards, America is a very conformist country. You | can see this in how schoolchildren are required to pledge | allegiance to the flag, to the slow acceptance of gay rights, | to controversy over saying over "Happy Holidays." | | I deeply wish America was a country that supported | individualism in the sense of supporting and even celebrating | the right to live your life as you see fit. | | All too often, however, it seems that this love of | "individualism" only surfaces when someone needs help or asks | for cooperation. | | That's not individualism. This simply selfishness. | nkssy wrote: | Well, if your view is around individualism and shaping yourself | then maybe the whole self-help industry isn't so accidental. | Maybe its a progression of a strong need for materials to | support that view. Other countries also have it as well but its | nowhere near the seemingly overwhelming desire as in the US. | | Or perhaps theres a travelling sideshow element to self-help | that appeals to the PT Barnum types. But I'm not so cynical. | BeetleB wrote: | > America, in contrast with most other countries, has very | little cultural infrastructure to guide people. Freedom and | individualism (however shallow) is emphasized. | | This is very accurate. Having lived in other countries, I can | say the "other" side suffers from a different extreme: Sticking | to flawed social constructs that impede their progress and/or | happiness, no matter how much research and/or self help you | throw at them. | bryananderson wrote: | As a counterpoint, we in America certainly do not seem to be | immune to sticking with flawed social constructs that impede | our progress/happiness. | | For that matter, less-individualistic societies such as | European countries don't seem immune to some of the symptoms | the parent comment mentioned, such as sports-worship. | | There is something to the notion that American individualism | comes with its unique pathologies, but there's clearly a lot | more to the story of why things like self-help have exploded. | | For one thing, as traditional sources of meaning have | withered under the harsh lights of science and modernity, all | wealthy societies have seemed to struggle with a crisis of | meaning. | | This leaves a vacuum that gets filled with self-help (the | secret to a meaningful life is here in this book), sports- | worship, celebrity-worship, video-game escapism, neo- | nationalism, whatever. This can be seen all over the | developed world. However, America's extreme individualism may | exacerbate this crisis of meaning, since community is often | itself a source of meaning. | | We cannot go back to pre-modernity, nor should we try. | | What can we do to build societies, here and now, that help | people feel a sense of meaning in their lives without the | ghastly drawbacks of past sources of meaning such as religion | and ethnic nationalism? | hallway_monitor wrote: | Very insightful post. One thing I've often thought about | America is we have less traditional sources of wisdom and | value since we basically threw out all tradition. | | I think you left out the biggest thing people do to fill | the void of existential dread: spend money! America is far | more obsessed with that habit than any of the ones listed | in my experience. | et-al wrote: | I've long joked that the most beautiful word in the | English language is not "cellar door", but "sale". | fullshark wrote: | What is cultural infrastructure in other countries? Is it just | religion / worship? | sasaf5 wrote: | Thousands of years of history, local legends unaffected by | foreign religions, carefully maintained genealogy trees, | archives of state decisions from eons ago etc... | | To be fair with the US, they have formed a pretty neat legend | around the founding fathers and the constitution. I would | consider that cultural infrastructure. | aerosmile wrote: | It would be the concept of "tradition," which means very | different things in the US and Europe. | | First and foremost, there's the pure frequency in which that | term is used. Good luck spending a day in Europe and not | being exposed to one tradition or another. It's kind of cute | in a superficial way (the way that people dress up for balls | in Vienna), and very counter-progressive in others (the way | that doctors are more respected than programmers). | | I would also wage to say that the pure interpretation of the | term is a bit different. In the US, using the term | "traditionally" in a sentence could have a positive | connotation (eg: "traditionally, we celebrate new launches | with some drinks") or a negative connotation ("those | traditional companies are usually lacking in technology"). In | contrast, invoking the term "tradition" in a sentence in, | let's say Germany, would be to describe a near-religious | ritual that cannot and must not be changed or even questioned | (eg: "for Oktoberfest, people dress in traditional outfits | that include lederhosen and dirndls.") I struggle to think of | a frequent context in Germany in which the term traditional | would have a negative connotation. | | All this is to say that tradition is a wonderful thing if | your circumstances lead you to invoke as little change as | possible. But for those seeking social mobility and other | types of change in their lives, I would argue that traditions | can be very negative. | rayiner wrote: | It's not just religion. In Bangladesh, where I'm from, | there's a whole bunch of social norms and practices enforced | by your mom talking about you to your aunties and your dad | talking with your uncles. In fact, my family was quite non- | religious, but we still had all this cultural infrastructure. | | Two concrete examples. Families have strong involvement in | marriage. This isn't just "here's your spouse take it or | leave it." It's a process by which people who have been | married a long time and coach a young person about what | qualities to look for in a marriage partner. (I remember my | wife remarking 8 years into our American-style marriage that | she was surprised by how inconsequential her dating | preferences at 25 turned out to be. "Who cares what kind of | music your husband likes at 2 am when the baby is crying?") | | There's also a lot of active coaching in marriage. I remember | my dad being dispatched by the aunties to fly to another | state to coach a young couple going through a rough patch. | _RPL5_ wrote: | Here is a list of 200 most popular books sold at Ozon, the | biggest on-line retailer in Russia: | | https://www.ozon.ru/highlight/top-200-knig-po-mneniyu-chitat... | | Of the Top-12, 6 to 8 are some form of a self-help book: | | * 1st: The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F _ck. | | _ 2nd: Say Yes To Life, a self-help book from an Austrian | Holocaust surviver. | | * 4th: Ben Graham's Intelligent Investor. | | * 5th: A Russian-author book on the art of "convincing" & | "influencing" people (sound familiar?). | | * 6th: Another American book, "Radical Forgiveness: A Guide to | Spiritual Healing" | | * 8th: Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. | | * 11th: Women Who Love Too Much: If Love is Causing Suffering. | Also a US book. | | * 12th: Atlas Shrugged. I suppose it's not a self-help book, | but it's very much in line with the spirit of "open-your-eyes" | literature. | | * If you go down the list, there is a bunch of other titles | like Rich Dad Poor Dad, the full set of Nassim Taleb's quasi | self-improvement books, etc. | | We can sort of argue whether some of these books are self-help | adjacent or not (like Ben Graham or Nassim Taleb), but the | trend is clear: self-improvement literature is very popular in | Russia. | | This shows that the self-help cottage industry is not limited | to the US. I think people just like the idea of self- | improvement. | | edit: formatting | azinman2 wrote: | A very American trait is to assume something is very American | and doesn't apply elsewhere. Usually 'elsewhere' is just | defined as a shallow understanding of Europe. | alisonatwork wrote: | Agreed. Just last year The Economist had a short article on | the popularity of self-help books in China[0]. It's estimated | almost a third of all books sold in the country are self-help | books. | | If anything I would expect self-help to be more popular in | less well-off countries, where there is perhaps more | incentive to be hyper-competitive to try get ahead. | | [0] https://www.economist.com/china/2020/11/12/why-self-help- | boo... | chmod600 wrote: | I believe this comes from confusion between freedom as a choice | with consequences, and freedom as a choice without | consequences. | | The latter definition has taken hold over the last few decades | because it is seen as offensive to reinforce good choices. | Suggesting that people maintain a good diet and exercise is | seen as offensive to obese people. Suggesting that people marry | a good, stable partner before having children is seen as | offensive to single mothers. Suggesting that people focus on | jobs and careers that provide stable income is seen as crushing | someone's self-actualized aspirations. And suggesting that any | of these groups be responsible for the outcomes of their | choices is unthinkable. | | When such basic advice is off-limits, what cultural | infrastructure could we possibly have? | | Edit: removed distracting example. | lostdog wrote: | The cultural infrastructure we had was extremely poor. We put | a ton of focus into shaming and punishing people for bad | behavior, and it just didn't work. Fat shaming has resulted | in even more obese people. Punishing unmarried couples didn't | increase the number of stable partnerships at all. We lost | the war on drugs. | | I don't agree with the current trends either ("it's | completely ok to do bad thing X!"). However, in addition to | good advice for individuals, we need to keep trying to create | cultural infrastructure that really does work. | rayiner wrote: | > Punishing unmarried couples didn't increase the number of | stable partnerships at all. | | That's a bad example. Family stability plummeted after the | sexual revolution, even as access to birth control and | abortion made family planning easier: https://en.wikipedia. | org/wiki/Single_parents_in_the_United_S... | [deleted] | mkr-hn wrote: | I suspect the lower stress of acceptance, even when it goes | overboard in cases where the thing can actually be harmful, | still leads to better outcomes. Stress is a well-documented | factor in weight gain, for example. My covid 19 after years | of losing weight is proof! | | The loss came from self-acceptance. I stopped beating | myself up when I slipped up, and I stopped letting other | people shame me for it. That was good for 50 pounds, and | I'm headed back down now that I'm vaccinated and getting as | much back on track as I can. I don't have data handy, but I | suspect shaming has killed more people and ruined more | lives than acceptance. | foolinaround wrote: | i think a carrot and stick approach would have worked. | | if the shaming is the stick, but where is the carrot? | | they should be provided alternatives and policies that prod | towards the better options. | mkr-hn wrote: | "is seen as" x 4 | | By who? | | I'm pretty sure they still teach the difference between | passive and active voice in school. Passive voice is great if | you want to paint in broad strokes without naming names so | people can't actually discuss your points. This is choir- | preaching. Or argument by implication if you want a secular | term. | blooalien wrote: | > "... and so forth." | | ... celebrity worship, corporation worship, politician worship, | money worship, conspiracy theories ... | adolph wrote: | https://fs.blog/2012/04/david-foster-wallace-this-is-water/ | | _Because here's something else that's weird but true: in the | day-to-day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such | thing as atheism. There is no such thing as not worshipping. | Everybody worships. The only choice we get is what to | worship. And the compelling reason for maybe choosing some | sort of god or spiritual-type thing to worship-be it JC or | Allah, be it YHWH or the Wiccan Mother Goddess, or the Four | Noble Truths, or some inviolable set of ethical principles-is | that pretty much anything else you worship will eat you | alive._ | 0xEFF wrote: | None of those things are particularly American, or even | western. | enraged_camel wrote: | As someone who was born and raised overseas, I would say | they take up a much larger space in the American psyche | though. | psychomugs wrote: | I've been binging Adam Curtis documentaries recently, and the | unifying thread has been the rise of individualism and its | being coopted by commerce. In a discussion regarding | HyperNormalization [1], he argued that we're beginning to | realize how shallow this individualism is, and religion will | rear its head at some point to fill this void. | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIHC4NNScEI | oldmanrahul wrote: | Thanks for the link. Really enjoyed this take on | individualism | jokoon wrote: | Humans are always looking for things to believe in. When people | become less religious, they still need something to put their | faith in. | | Motivation and happiness are vague words or concepts. | | Existentialism and existential nihilism explain this. | | Those books are not based on science, and if they were, they | would talk about it. | | Apart from saving the world from climate change and tax justice I | cannot find any meaning I could find in those books. | [deleted] | alexpetralia wrote: | There are productive (empowering) and unproductive (parasitic) | forms of self-help. I have found the former to be useful for as | long as I can remember; the latter to be strongly avoided. | alexpatin wrote: | How does one discern between productive and unproductive forms | of self-help? | BitwiseFool wrote: | It's up to each individual to decide, but is progress being | made, or at the very least, are behaviors changing as a | result of the person's efforts and not _only_ because of the | outside help? | WalterBright wrote: | > was to enshrine the central myth of early America--that the | origins and long-term viability of the American experiment rested | on the image of "the yeoman farmer as patriot and model citizen." | | It's not a myth. It's the truth about early America. Big | businesses really didn't arrive in force until after the Civil | War. | toivo wrote: | Well I'm not American and I read mostly "self-help" books, from | "In Search of Meaning" to "Code Complete" to "Extreme Ownership" | to "High Output Management" to "Never Split The Difference". I | always read one before I go to sleep. | Sr_developer wrote: | I think you are confusing "Self-Help" with "non-fiction". | [deleted] | topspin wrote: | Code Complete is a self-help book? I never imagined that book | would be categorized as self-help. With a definition of "self- | help" broad enough to include it the question in my mind is | "What isn't self-help?" | [deleted] | [deleted] | jf22 wrote: | I'm going to try and give up self-help and business books and | podcasts and only read sci-fi. | | My career is fine, I'm fine, I know enough about tech and | engineering management to be at least mediocre. | | There is a 50 book 40k series out there I think I'd rather spend | more time with. | robotnikman wrote: | As a fan ok the 40k series as well, which books in particular? | xyzelement wrote: | While the quality of self-help material is variable, what I think | is valuable (and I guess pretty American) is the focus on that | which you can change for yourself. | | It seems more popular recently to talk about external problems | that you realistically can't impact ("why should anyone be a | billionaire") rather than focus on what you can actually change | ("how do I grow valuable skill sets and market myself better to | increase my compensation.") | | Obviously, not every self-help book is going to be good, or right | for you, and you may not absorb and implement it, but I'd much | rather bet on someone who at least tries to steer their own ship. | CJefferson wrote: | While America seems to spend a lot of time talking about "how | to improve / change yourself", and the "American Dream", every | study I've seen (for example | https://www3.weforum.org/docs/Global_Social_Mobility_Report.... | ), shows it does poorly for social mobility. | xyzelement wrote: | I bet that people who subscribe to the mobility mindset are | statistically more mobile than those who don't believe it's | possible. | adolph wrote: | The two items seem not incongruent. | | According to that report, the US is a half standard deviation | above the median of social mobility. It isn't charitable to | characterize that as doing "poorly." | KittenInABox wrote: | If we never talk about external problems such as systems that | make it impossible to meaningfully increase one's compensation, | then no amount of change in self could actually fix anything. | Let's say you're a disabled person who can't even get married | because then you lose your income and therefore become | financially dependent on your partner, which creates a super | uncomfortable relationship between the two of you. What can you | change yourself, or should you instead talk about the fact the | government's laws and merit-gating has royally fucked you over | and advocate for systemic changes? Maybe through writing a blog | post or opinion article in a newspaper... | BeetleB wrote: | > If we never talk about external problems such as systems | that make it impossible to meaningfully increase one's | compensation, then no amount of change in self could actually | fix anything. | | This is merely arguing from extremes, and is responding to a | position your parent did not take (i.e. strawman): He didn't | say "never" or "always", he said "more popular" | | Also, I could make the equally correct/problematic statement: | | If we only talk about external problems such as systems that | make it impossible to meaningfully increase one's | compensation, then no amount of social reform will improve | your condition. | | You need external things to change, but you also need to | change yourself internally. The dispute is on how much of | each. | deregulateMed wrote: | Thinking of Mortimer Adler's How To Read A Book... | | Self Help is either a How To book or Philosophy? | | Both have quite a bit of value to the individual. Even as the | author describes this as feeding the business machine, both self | help and philosophy can make you aware when this is happening. | | I read these genres and can see clearly why my boss was told to | repeat company statements. I sit back and witness corporate | propaganda/marketing and am aware they are coming for my brain. | | Without self help and philosophy, would I be hacked into mindless | compliance? | neonate wrote: | https://archive.is/RdFmK | borepop wrote: | I enjoy some self-help books because they seem to articulate an | underlying gameplan for pursuing whatever one considers | "success," which are ideas my parents and school only taught me | implicitly or inaccurately. My parents' advice to me as a kid was | "do what you love and the money will follow," which is not true, | and/or "join the Navy," which I had no desire to do. So I've | ended up trying to find my own way in life, however imperfectly. | | Essentially, a lot of these books are about executive functioning | skills, the meta-level planning and goal-setting and failure- | analysis efforts that are necessary to make progress in whatever | field. I think it is also true, as other commenters note, that to | some extent they fill an ethical or existential void left by the | decline of religion. | pyrale wrote: | > "join the Navy," | | Maybe they hoped this way you'd get to learn the science | technology? :-) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-07-06 23:00 UTC)