[HN Gopher] Podswap: Keep airpods alive and out of the landfill ___________________________________________________________________ Podswap: Keep airpods alive and out of the landfill Author : ilarum Score : 177 points Date : 2021-07-11 15:44 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.thepodswap.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.thepodswap.com) | azuriten wrote: | This is a great idea and I wish we had this in the UK. I was | quoted PS65 to replace my failing, right AirPod and PS130 to | replace both of them when RRP for new ones are PS160. | | I'd much rather replace the batteries of my existing ones then | buy a new pair but with such a small price difference to get a | pair it doesn't seem worth it. | Etheryte wrote: | As someone who gets a ridiculous amount of use out of their pods, | I really hope this business pans out. I think the product is | great, but batteries are consumable products. In fact, I would | hope that one day it would be mandatory to offer battery | replacements for all products you sell. (Do correct me if I'm | wrong, I don't think Apple currently does this for pods?) | denimnerd42 wrote: | what's frustrating is that while batteries are consumable | products they could last much longer if they stay between 80 | and 20% capacity without overheating. (this is similar to what | tesla does) I wish there was a "battery care" settings on all | electronics that would respect limits like this so that I could | get thousands of cycles out of my devices instead of only | <1000. | | Apple has added a feature which tries to do this intelligently | to some extent but it's not the best at guessing what my needs | are. | | The majority of the time I do not need max or even half of max | battery life from my devices. airpods I only use for an hour or | two at a time for example and my phone is usually close to a | charger. | polishdude20 wrote: | That might be what's already happening behind the scenes | though. They tell you you're at 10% but that's actually 30% | for example | stefan_ wrote: | For cars, maybe, but my org has had a long line of HP | laptops with swollen battery packs within a year of use. No | doubt there are companies out there that would rather have | the extra hour of runtime on some journalists review fact | sheet than a battery that doesn't put their customers at | risk. | eitland wrote: | I hope all those gets replaced under warranty? | | I hounded Dell for months and got them to replace I guess | 2 or 3 dozens of Optiplex DL270 motherboards and it felt | good: forcing them to take the cost for their shoddy | work. | stefan_ wrote: | They do but in the meantime you got a laptop that only | works off AC. | HPsquared wrote: | There's another side as well though - a failing battery | will stop working unpredictably, which is also very bad | for business/productivity. | alisonkisk wrote: | That's heat damage not discharge. | denimnerd42 wrote: | 10% vs 30% corresponds to whatever arbitrary voltage they | select but I doubt they are selecting for battery | durability over all else since marketing max run time is so | important. | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Automotive engineer that doesn't work on EVs here... | there is a lot that goes into the battery. Heating and | cooling elements for instance. You're right, max runtime | is the number one factor, but this can be gamed just like | MPG ratings. | | I'm not sure many reviews are checking 0-60 times at 20% | battery for example. | | My EV has a hilarious "miles remaining" number that | INSTANTLY changes when the HVAC is on, doesn't matter if | it's only slightly on or not, I instantly "lose" 8 or 9%. | It's pretty loose. As to what I actually get? Doesn't | really matter, never even compared to rating, mfgs know | we use these cars for city travel. | | The small percentage of EVs you see on long haul highway, | owners already know to carefully plan their trips. | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Good point, and it is/does for many products. EVs beyond | Tesla all do this for instance. | | I do wish there was a little more of treating your users | like adults though. If I have enough battery to make an | urgent call, but it puts me under the 20% recommended, I | want to make that call at the cost of long term battery | life. | | My products treat users like adults, I wish it was a more | common consideration. | elliekelly wrote: | It _does_ feel like the final 10% of battery lasts way | longer than the drain from 20% to 10%. | ddlutz wrote: | estimating battery life is hard, it might be due to that. | GekkePrutser wrote: | Well the good thing about these kinds of buds is that your | rarely discharge them heavily. Because you always put them | back in the case. Mine never go below 50% (don't have airpods | but cheapie EUR20 xiaomis that work surprisingly great). | | But it would be nice to have an option to avoid 100% yes. | wonnage wrote: | There are a lot of complaints about the buds not charging | in the case, most likely due to not making full contact | with the charging pins. The buds have no auto-sleep feature | for some reason, so they'll stay connected until the | battery runs out. | | Not only is this annoying, it also adds tons of unnecessary | full discharge cycles. | | The new wireless charging cases are also bad - they seem to | stay warm even when no longer charging, which probably | degrades the batteries as well. | tbrock wrote: | Apple is the only laptop manufacturer that even gets close to | 1000 cycles of great battery life. | tedunangst wrote: | Alas, a product that lasts five hours for 100 cycles gets | much better reviews than a product that lasts four hours for | 1000 cycles. | alisonkisk wrote: | Look at an airpod. Why should the battery be consumable but not | the airpod? They have about the same amount of electronics. The | average airpod user throws out more than an airpod's worth of | plastic _per day_. I get _junk mail_ with electronic trash that | is bigger than an airpod. | | Airpods are used with iPhones that have 20x the amount of | electronics, so should last 20x as long. | | People's real concern is the _price_ which is higher than they | guess because they think airpods are like regular headphones in | longevity. | reaperducer wrote: | The web site states: "The first-ever battery replacement | program." | | I'm not sure this is true. Apple had an AirPods battery | replacement program before COVID-19. I had my wife's done. I | wanted to get mine done this past January, but it didn't seem to | be an option anymore. Maybe because of the pandemic and the | global supply chain problems and such. | | "Only current" battery replacement program, maybe. But not first- | ever. | conradev wrote: | My understanding is that Apple never replaced the batteries, | they just swapped the AirPods with new ones | reaperducer wrote: | That's what this company does, too. | GekkePrutser wrote: | But with refurbished ones, not new. And at a much better | price. | lights0123 wrote: | No, they actually open them up and swap the battery and | resell, i.e. refurbishing. Apple just throws them away. | reaperducer wrote: | According to the company's web site, they send you | replacement AirPods before you send your old ones in. So | no, they are not replacing your batteries and sending | them back to you. | internet2000 wrote: | Are we sure Apple just throws them away? | mikestew wrote: | They could be referring to the fact Apple did not really | replace your batteries, but instead just gave you a new set of | AirPods. | | OTOH, I guess Apple's program _does_ replace the batteries, | just not in the way I thought they would. | specialist wrote: | Just guessing: | | Podswap has stock of both new "blank" bud cases and batteries. | | Crack open buds using some kind of jig. Scoop out the | electronics. Solder to new battery. Cram it all back together. | | That's how I'd do it. | | Bonus points for choice of colors. I'd love clear or forest green | or deep purple. | | Watching a few air pod tear down videos, I find it weird the | battery itself isn't part of the case. Like just use white | instead of black. Have the barrel twist lock into place. Makes | the battery replaceable. And that extra millimeter of diameter | would probably be 50% more mAh. | | I know replaceable batteries is un-Apple. But that's what I'd do. | tyingq wrote: | >Podswap has stock of both new "blank" bud cases and batteries. | | They seem very picky about the condition of the case on what | you send in, so I'm not sure they have a stock of new cases. | | See: | https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0520/9856/4273/products/ai... | specialist wrote: | Oops. I misread that graphic. I thought it was examples of | "before" air pods. | | My puppy gnawed on my pair, so I was excited to get them | rehabilitated. | throwaway81523 wrote: | Their FAQ is pretty clear that they actually replace the | batteries somehow. I'm glad someone figured out how to do that, | but I agree with you that the airpod batteries (like the | batteries in everything else) should have been replaceable in | the first place. | beckman466 wrote: | > I agree with you that the airpod batteries (like the | batteries in everything else) should have been replaceable in | the first place. | | 100% agree, you can't unsee things like this: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mleQVO1Vd1I | ryana wrote: | I've used podswap for my Gen 1 AirPods and it was fantastic. It | took a couple cycles for everything to be back to normal (full | charge, full volume) but they were up front that it takes a few | recharges for everything to settle in. | | Absolutely no complaints. | bruceb wrote: | I am pro refurbishing/reusing and having less waste but its hard | to care about tiny airpods being tossed. | | Maybe they test the message and it resonated better than "Airpods | should last longer than your last relationship" or "1 trick that | Apple hates" | | etc. | samatman wrote: | It's just the Discourse in action. | | For whatever reason, AirPods, of all things, have become a go- | to example of environmental waste and throwaway culture. | | It's bizarre to me. I'm fairly confident that for minutes of | pleasure / embodied energy, AirPods score higher than almost | anything else I own, certainly among things with a battery and | chip. They also last multiples of the time I would get out of | wired earphones, which always die in a few months from work- | hardening the copper wires until they break. | | My model is this: some people just hate Apple. It's an identity | thing, phones are very personal and bring out tribal instincts | (blue vs. green speech bubbles!), and AirPods are a _visible_ | signifier of "team Apple". So some people just, don't like 'em | -\\_(tsu)_/-. The reasons are downstream of that. | | I also think that, since the only consumables are the battery | and speaker membranes, it's great that someone wants to replace | the batteries when they go bad. Membranes as well! Making | consumer goods last longer is virtuous. | an_opabinia wrote: | > last multiples of the time I would get out of wired | earphones, which always die in a few months from work- | hardening the copper wires until they break | | Hmm... | | > It's just the Discourse in action... I'm fairly confident | that for minutes of pleasure / embodied energy, AirPods score | higher than almost anything else I own, certainly among | things with a battery and chip | | It's interesting to reduce environmentalism to "joy per unit | size * time." To its credit, if you do the accounting right, | a lot of environmentally really bad things, like gasoline and | meat, have very poor joy per (size time), while being a | tourist in a conserved rainforest has very high joy per size | time. | | But it's still flawed. Like Bitcoin has high joy per unit | size and time, it turns cheaper electricity into more money | you can spend on jetskis. No intellectually honest person | claims that is environmentally friendly. You've chosen a | framework that's idiosyncratically very friendly to | electronics and things nerds are into, that I'm not sure | would even make sense to people in almost any time prior to | 1970. They by and large lived without the joys of electronics | and did nothing to address the environmental disaster they're | dying too soon to experience. Surely you see the same thing | happening now, and right to repair is just one of many fronts | of forward-thinking people trying to right those wrongs. | | I'm not advocating for "end to end emissions" as the | framework either, because what you're saying people hate on | Apple for is almost always true about Tesla. People | complaining about electric cars having higher emissions are | both wrong and saying that stuff in bad faith. | | But to go on social media and complain about the "Discourse" | you are participating in is definitely intellectually | dishonest. AirPods are shitty in their own unique way, and | I'm not sure if any intellectual is seriously advocating, in | their raw quoted form as opposed to a headline, that the way | that they are shitty is exclusively your reductive | perspective on "environmentally friendly." | samatman wrote: | You misread me, my case was joy * time / embodied energy. | | How else should we justify the use of energy except through | such means? Subjectively I mean, I wouldn't suggest | actually quantifying it. | | I don't burn energy in the winter because I like to spend | money, I do it because there's an interior temperature | below which I'm miserable. Once I've achieved that | homeostasis, the only think left to me is to do it with _as | little energy as possible_. | | > _AirPods are shitty in their own unique way_ | | That's just like, your opinion, man. | | Speaking of intellectual dishonesty, I will never reply to | you again. | an_opabinia wrote: | I own AirPods, I like them, but it sucks that they die | when their battery dies, and they have to be thrown away | for pretty much no good reason - just because that's how | Apple designed it, and it could have many design | priorities, and one of those priorities is to not throw | nice shit away after two years. | | In the spirit of advancing curiosity, it was interesting | to just see, is it possible to reduce environmentalism to | something like "joy * time / embodied energy"? Bitcoin is | mined because a bitcoin is worth more than the | electricity used to mine it, so if your joy * time is | "making money quickly" - which it is for a lot of people! | - it seems really attractive to mine bitcoin but it isn't | environmentally friendly. | slg wrote: | You can't just blame this on "the Discourse" or Apple haters. | I have owned countless devices with batteries over my life. | None has made me as acutely aware of its battery degrading as | Airpods. Eventually I couldn't even make it through a full | workout or work call on a single charge. They basically | became worthless through nothing but normal usage. There was | no visible physical damage. I treated them exactly how I was | supposed to treat them according to Apple and still only got | 2-3 years out of them. That is frustrating. It also is unlike | many other Apple products as lots of people are perfectly | satisfied with their 5+ year old Macbooks and iPhones. | TaylorAlexander wrote: | This seems way too conveniently dismissive of the | environmental issue. Apple is the 800 lb gorilla that sets | industry expectations. They have been gluing batteries and | making repair difficult across their product line for a | decade. This leads to higher consumer costs and manufactured | goods filling landfills prematurely. As one of the most | visible companies in the world making repair difficult, the | criticism is well-deserved. The airpods are perhaps the | height of unrepairable apple tech. | | Sure any valid criticism of Apple is going to invite a pile- | on from the apple haters but it does not follow that the | original criticism is invalid. | dehrmann wrote: | > This leads to higher consumer costs and manufactured | goods filling landfills prematurely. | | Citation needed. Apple claims, and I'm fine with taking it | with a grain of salt, that because batteries aren't | replaceable like old Nokia phones, they can make the | battery larger, possibly reducing consumer costs and how | often batteries are changed. It's not just Apple, either. | Consumers seem to not care. | TaylorAlexander wrote: | It seems obvious to me that this is true at least with | laptops. And whatever costs are saved by a 5% larger | battery must surely be offset by the higher costs of | replacement when the battery ultimately dies? | | I don't know it's so clear to me that this is true that | I've not felt the need to research it. By all means if | you have sources to the contrary I'd be happy to read | them. | | To me, we could save significant environmental waste if | everything we manufactured was made to be repaired. I | designed several pairs of 3D printed headphones [1] which | are now the only headphones I wear, and the idea that I | can replace any part if it breaks seems significant to | me. | | [1] https://github.com/tlalexander/reboot-headphones | [deleted] | crazygringo wrote: | Seriously, I never understand the "environmental waste" | argument as applied to _AirPods_. | | The pair of buds weighs a _third_ of a _single_ disposable AA | battery. There 's less plastic than in an average Chinese | takeout container. | | If you want to complain that they're _expensive_ to replace | then go ahead. But as soon as anyone brings up _the | environment_ , give me a break. We're not talking about a 65" | television that weight 55 pounds, c'mon. Each bud is _four | grams_ of mass. | | If people threw out twenty pairs of AirPods a day, then sure | let's worry about the environmental issue. But when they | dispose of one pair every two to three years? I don't think so. | ashayh wrote: | Why do we need a separate business for this? | | Apple should be made to pay for it. | | If anyone finds an Airpod on the street or in trash/landfills, | they should be able to take it to the nearest Apple store or mail | it and get 20-40$ back for it. | | This should be the law for _all_ and any products, not just | electronics. Large corporations have cleverly shifted the | responsibility of recycling on the consumer, while they get to | reap all the profits and benefits. This was recently well | explained in a John Oliver segment: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fiu9GSOmt8E | lttlrck wrote: | I agree that manufacturers should bear responsibility for | recycling unwanted/returned devices - but why should they be | forced to pay a bounty for lost/stolen devices? | qeternity wrote: | You can't just claim that they've shifted responsibility | without arguing your point. It's clear you have an axe to | grind, but at the same time, where do we draw the line of | individual responsibility? | | It's not like we haven't known for decades we were killing the | planet...and yet here we all are. Why does the average Joe get | off the hook here? | fshbbdssbbgdd wrote: | The average Joe has known for decades and the problem | continues. Ergo, we can't rely on individual action to solve | it. We need society-scale solutions. Corporate action is the | only tool civilization has for this. | KingMachiavelli wrote: | Generic electronics recycling is very expensive. I had to | recycle an old 55" rear projection TV and it cost $150. Good | luck getting the average person to pay that instead of | disposing of it (illegally). | | It would be more efficient and cheaper for companies to | create a recycling process and include that in the purchase | price. | qeternity wrote: | > It would be more efficient and cheaper for companies to | create a recycling process and include that in the purchase | price. | | A totally fair point (one that I also happen to agree with) | but not in the spirit of OP's comment, which suggests some | sort of moral trickery by the likes of Apple. | reaperducer wrote: | _Generic electronics recycling is very expensive. I had to | recycle an old 55 " rear projection TV and it cost $150. | Good luck getting the average person to pay that instead of | disposing of it (illegally)._ | | Blame your municipality. | | When I lived in the southwest, the city required the trash | companies to pick up or recycle EVERYTHING for free. From | old paint to batteries to giant tube TVs to washing | machines. Everything, or they didn't get the trash hauling | contract. | | This was to make it as easy as possible for people to | dispose of things properly, rather than dump them in the | desert. | | If your city doesn't make this happen, it's a failure of | the city to negotiate the contract properly and allowing | the trash companies to shift the expense onto the | homeowners. | KingMachiavelli wrote: | That just moves the cost of recycling to the public. The | public shouldn't have to bear the costs of the negative | externality of other people's consumption. It is also | essentially a regressive tax since the wealthy | consume/dispose of more goods. Also most areas don't have | a single exclusive trash service (monopoly). | | Furthermore, single stream recycling in America, on | average, is a complete failure. The portion of stuff that | is actually recycled is very low as much is contaminated | with non-recyclable materials. I'd either expect such a | trash/recycling service (as you describe) to be quite | expensive or actually recycle very little of relative to | what _could_ be recycled. | | If the manufacture's & end consumers of goods were forced | to confront the cost of disposal at the time of purchase | it would create a large incentive for companies to make | products with less waste and products that are easier to | recycle. The goal isn't to just to recycle everything | that _currently_ can be recycled but to make everything | _easy_ to recycle. | reaperducer wrote: | _That just moves the cost of recycling to the public_ | | The public has an interest in a clean desert, since the | desert surrounding the city was the primary source of | recreation for the people living there. | | _It is also essentially a regressive tax since the | wealthy consume /dispose of more goods_ | | Trash fees were based on the assessed value of your home, | so the wealthy paid more in trash fees than the poor. | | _Also most areas don 't have a single exclusive trash | service (monopoly)._ | | As noted in the original comment, there were multiple | trash companies in this city. All had to adhere to the | same rules. | | _single stream recycling in America, on average, is a | complete failure_ | | It wasn't single stream. There were four bins. One each | for garbage, glass, metals, and plastics. | | _I 'd either expect such a trash/recycling service (as | you describe) to be quite expensive or actually recycle | very little of relative to what could be recycled._ | | I rented my house, so I couldn't tell you if it was | expensive, or not. But as I stated above, the price was | based on the value of the home. I doubt anyone ever | changed their mind about buying a house because the cost | of trash disposal in City A was $10/month more than in | City B. | | _If the manufacture 's & end consumers of goods were | forced to confront the cost of disposal at the time of | purchase it would create a large incentive for companies | to make products with less waste and products that are | easier to recycle._ | | I agree. But that's not the reality today. We may get | there 50 years from now, but people don't want to live | surrounded by 50 years of garbage in order to fulfill a | social theory. | | _The goal isn 't to just to recycle everything that | currently can be recycled but to make everything easy to | recycle._ | | Which was exactly what this did: Make it easy for people | to recycle everything that could be recycled. | jrowen wrote: | IMO, we draw the line based on effectiveness, not idealized | morality. What's going to be easier: a never-ending campaign | of trying to educate and motivate millions of different | average Joes to properly recycle [some item], or simply | legally preventing those items from being created by a few | centralized sources (or requiring them to take responsibility | in some other way)? | | Same thing with with 2008 sub-prime mortgage crisis. A lot of | people will say "well they shouldn't have taken those loans." | Yes, true, but it would have been much easier if they were | never allowed to be offered in the first place. Some people | are against the "save the people from themselves" mentality, | but it really seems to be a lot more effective and there's | not a strong argument for allowing practices that are likely | to result in average Joes taking deleterious actions. | mschuster91 wrote: | > You can't just claim that they've shifted responsibility | without arguing your point. | | The point itself is enough. Bottle and car battery deposit | schemes show that the system works to significantly reduce | littering. Most people take them to the recycling on their | own and those who can't be bothered always get picked up by | people. | | A 10-20EUR deposit on phones, a 5EUR deposit on small scale | stuff like chargers and earphones and a 1EUR deposit on | batteries would _definitely_ get electronics stuff back into | circulation. | seriousquestion wrote: | I've heard, anecdotally, of people losing their airpods often. I | haven't yet, but curious how common that problem is? | hughrr wrote: | Everyone I know has them. I haven't heard of any being lost. | samatman wrote: | I lost my first pair just recently, in four years of having | them, after a redeye flight. | | Knock on wood it'll be the only time! | agency wrote: | I've gotten close. One thing I have noticed is when I drop the | case on the floor it's not at all uncommon for it to open and | for one or both of the buds to fly out. One time this happened | to me while I was in the security line at the airport and I had | to awkwardly back out of the line and look around but luckily I | found the errant pod. | reaperducer wrote: | _I 've heard, anecdotally, of people losing their airpods | often. I haven't yet, but curious how common that problem is?_ | | It must be a thing, since Apple lets you use your devices to | find your missing AirPods, and they are even part of the FindMe | network. | | I've sometimes wondered how many AirPods have been flushed down | toilets around the world. Even if only .001% of AirPods meet | their demise this way, considering the number of AirPods sold, | it must be a pretty good number. | rhinoceraptor wrote: | I flushed the right ear of my Airpods pro. I bought a new | pair the next day because I use them all day for video calls | because they're so convenient. | DonHopkins wrote: | What did everyone in the video call hear in the right audio | channel? | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruCsYGL3QlY&ab_channel=Lesl | i... | easton wrote: | The Find My network stuff isn't coming until the fall. Right | now they only update their location when connected to your | phone, which is basically useless. | mschuster91 wrote: | I'm mostly losing them in my bed since the Airpods are a solid, | partner-compatible way to fall asleep to music. | | My biggest annoyance with the Airpods Pro is that no one sells | custom molds. The right one fits with the small plug, but none | of the three sizes that ship with the Airpods seem to be | compatible with my left ear, it's extremely loose. In any case | it's uncomfortable walking with them out on the streets or | driving with my bike simply because I'm always afraid they will | randomly fall off and get lost or destroyed. | [deleted] | smoldesu wrote: | So you're paying $60 to get your earbuds replaced, but you can't | use the service if they have any external/cosmetic damage. | Something here doesn't add up, is this just because Airpods don't | have replaceable batteries? | flatiron wrote: | Exactly. If the user could just do it you wouldn't need this | service. | Scoundreller wrote: | > can't use the service if they have any external/cosmetic | damage | | My guess is that you're not getting your own airpods back, but | someone else's. Quick turnaround that way and I think people | want that for a product like this. | | Positioning in Miami isn't ideal for turnaround, somewhere more | central or a courier hub (Memphis or Louisville) would make | more sense. | | As repair-turnaround time is no longer an issue, and Airpods | are small, they can fedex them to a low-cost country for | repair. Miami has tons of connections to S. America, so maybe | somewhere there. | | Just a Fedex SmallBox holds a couple hundred airpods (they're | 0.75inches if they were a rectangle, and smallbox is 200sqin), | so they can really take low-cost to an extreme. If China, well, | the batteries were going to be shipped from there anyway and | that's most of the bulk anyway, but cylinders do pack better. | | Here's a video of the whole process: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE9aB5aPbMM | | Many of these steps are scalable - could pre-tin battery leads, | find a better solvent than alcohol to soften adhesive, custom | heat protection cap rather than kitchen foil, dip metal cap in | ultrasonic solvent bath, etc. | | Maybe they have some domestic gigworkers in case they get | really busy, but otherwise, save that dollar. | ylyn wrote: | > My guess is that you're not getting your own airpods back, | but someone else's. | | I guess reading the linked site before commenting on it is no | longer in fashion. | | They clearly state that they send you a new (or refurbished | rather) pair before you send in your old pair. | wlesieutre wrote: | Yes, your alternative is to buy new AirPods from Apple at $70 | each ($140 for a pair) when the battery life becomes a problem. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-07-11 23:00 UTC)