[HN Gopher] Linear Circuit Design Handbook (2008) ___________________________________________________________________ Linear Circuit Design Handbook (2008) Author : mindcrime Score : 31 points Date : 2021-07-16 19:17 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.analog.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.analog.com) | JKCalhoun wrote: | No one will ever be able to explain op-amps to me satisfactorily. | I am too dense. But I am endlessly fascinated by them. Analog | circuits have (re)kindled a love for electronics in me. | jareklupinski wrote: | The Art of Electronics introduced me to Transistor Man, who | helpfully explained some of the more opaque topics with | "there's a demon doin it" until the theory made more sense | after learning more details | https://electronics.stackexchange.com/a/476734 | analog31 wrote: | My college didn't have an engineering department, but we took | electronics as physics majors, using _The Art of Electronics._ | The rules that we learned in class work for a large number of | op amp circuits: | | 1. The inputs draw no current | | 2. If there is negative feedback present, the output will do | whatever is necessary to render the two inputs equal | | So you can write the equations for the voltages at the two | inputs, include an equation that sets them equal, and solve for | the output. To handle circuits like filters, you have to solve | using complex numbers. This will be good enough to derive the | design formulas in the handbooks. | | These days, a third good rule is: | | 3. Buy an op amp that works as well as needed to obey rules 1 | and 2 in your application. Op amps have made huge strides in | terms of functionality and ease of design since I was in | college 4 decades ago. | GeorgeTirebiter wrote: | This is one of the best explanations of op amps: | https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sboa092b/sboa092b.pdf?ts=162646149... | ms-fellag wrote: | If watching videos is compatible with your learning style then | i highly recommend this whole series on Youtube about Op-Amps, | the channel is called RSD-Academy. | | This dude explained-it so well that i was astonished as to why | i didn't 'get' before. | | [the first video you can skip to 1:45] | <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OuUiwI8fDk> | | [the whole series] <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLL_n | f1OmixTTd7rEoqoM6...> | | There is also Dave Jones' op-amp tutorial at EEVBlog (if you | like Aussie accents and a bit more detailed/technical | explanation yet still targeted at beginners) | <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FYHt5XviKc> | ur-whale wrote: | Strange, op-amps (if you don't dive into pushing them to their | limits, and if you steer clear of trying to understand how they | are implemented) are actually a lot simpler to grok than - say | - an NPN transistor. | GeorgeTirebiter wrote: | Well.... yes, and. If you think of an NPN transistor as a | current-operated switch (e.g. to drive an LED or relay), then | you can have a pretty simple model of said NPN transistor. If | you want to make a low-noise PIN diode photodetector | amplifier with an op amp, you want to understand noise per | root Hz, input offset voltages, variations with temperature, | gain, frequency and phase response, and so much more. So, as | is often the case in Engineering: It Depends... | ur-whale wrote: | One thing I've never managed to wrap my head around is why many | analog designers insist on calling op-amp based analog circuit | design "linear design". | | If there's one thing these circuits are absolutely not it's being | linear. | | Every interesting circuit using op-amps basically is interesting | because of the various non-linear behaviors you have to deal with | when you optimize the circuit. | dreamcompiler wrote: | Op-amps are (theoretically) just linear differential amplifiers | with extremely high gain (like 10,000x or greater). They appear | nonlinear in open-loop configuration because their gain is so | high that any realistic input signal immediately pegs the | output against the rails. But with negative feedback they start | to appear linear again because you can set the gain to | something more reasonable. They're marvelous devices. | mhh__ wrote: | The one thing I wouldn't expect from electrical engineers is a | focus on nomenclature - I do love electronics but I am | perpetually annoyed by similar niggles as you are (it seems) + | a tendency to teach the same equation 3 times in 3 different | regimes even though I have spent years training myself to be | able to identify these approximations myself. | tuatoru wrote: | This is a somewhat contrarian statement--I'd like some | explanation and examples of what you mean. | | I find a x10 amplifier with high Zin, low Zout, low noise, low | error, and constant delay to be interesting enough. | | Every circuit is non-linear when used outside its design | limits, but this hardly needs asserting. | | And of course real devices are not perfect. Resistors have | inductance and capacitance and a thermal coefficient, | capacitors likewise have flaws, wires have resistance and self- | inductance, and circuit layout gives you stray capacitance, | crosstalk, and instability. Op amps themselves produce noise, | have input currents and offset voltages and limited slew rate | and bandwidth. And so on, and on. | | But again, none of that needs asserting. | | While you certainly can design lot of deliberately non-linear | circuits with op amps and non-linear devices in their feedback | paths, it's difficult to design linear circuits without them, | or instead with circuits, the core of which end up looking like | simplified op-amps. | | So, what did you have in mind when you said "the various non- | linear behaviours"? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-07-16 23:00 UTC)