[HN Gopher] Amiga 2000 EATX PCB ___________________________________________________________________ Amiga 2000 EATX PCB Author : doener Score : 122 points Date : 2021-07-24 09:48 UTC (13 hours ago) (HTM) web link (github.com) (TXT) w3m dump (github.com) | rbanffy wrote: | A lot of the retro experience is in the physical form. A matching | keyboard would be an important addition. | | I'm not really sure about going for the Amiga 2000 though... The | 3000 and 4000 were much friendlier towards modern hardware, as | well as much more capable out of the box. I could probably work | from a 3000 running Amiga Unix (thanks, X11). | LIV2 wrote: | I know the keyboard is being worked on by someone else, not | sure when that will be done though. | | Someone's done the A4000 in an ATX form factor too | https://www.retrosummit.com/2018/08/21/a4000tx-atx-amiga-mot... | braum wrote: | sincere questions. what is it about the Amiga, in 2021, that | still has such interest to warrant a project like this? Does it | do something a modern Mac or PC can't? Does it have a unique | ability that does something better? | gbin wrote: | I think it is the fact that the Amiga platform was in advance | on its time. A lot of amiga owners clinged to their Amiga | waiting for the next revisions to eat the world. When the PC | platform took over it was a step backward. All those projects | are a way to rewrite history for the fans: see we could have | had an amiga in pc form factor, see we could use the web, see | we could have had graphic accelerators... | | And the fact that today it is possible to do is a fun in | itself. | fogihujy wrote: | Many Amigans stuck with their aging hardware several years into | the early 00's, and I don't think the last of the real die- | hards gave upon Amiga Inc. until fairly recently. | | It took dedication and many now use it for creating the | ultimate retro computer. | flohofwoe wrote: | Lots of nostalgia of course, but the Amiga was a glimpse into | an alternative future where the computer was a productivity and | creativity device, not primarily a media consumption device, | while at the same time being friendly to beginners and | intuitive to use. For instance the way GUI and command line | worked together, and (starting with AmigaOS 2.0) applications | could be wired up to exchange data and provide services to | other applications in a consistent way across the whole system | is something that went way beyond the UNIX command line and | still is unmatched. | | Switching from my beloved Amiga 3000 to Windows 95 was like | being thrown back into the dark ages for a few years (apart | from the games of course, Doom FTW!), until the rest of the | world finally caught up (but not completely) with WinXP and | OSX. | zozbot234 wrote: | > For instance the way GUI and command line worked together, | and (starting with AmigaOS 2.0) applications could be wired | up to exchange data and provide services to other | applications in a consistent way across the whole system is | something that went way beyond the UNIX command line and | still is unmatched. | | Dbus actually took quite a bit of inspiration from Amiga REXX | ports (via KDE DCOP), so we've actually gotten that back in | recent years. But so many Amiga features are still lacking in | modern OS's. | vidarh wrote: | The problem for me with dbus is perceived complexity, and | lack of community expectations. | | Dbus tends to be treated as something developers might use, | while AREXX was something regular users used, and expected | applications to support. | | The technical capability is there, but something is | lacking. And that is the case for a lot of things I miss | from the Amiga - it's technically easy to replicate | datatypes for example. | the_third_wave wrote: | What the Amiga has which more modern systems lack is: | | * a stable - as in non-changing - platform from which to | extract as much performance as possible by way of programming | prowess instead of throwing a few more gigahertz/bytes at the | problem | | * a compact and rather elegant operating system which' state | can be kept in the head of a single person, this makes it | possible to reason your way through most problems | | * the combination of the above created a thriving demo scene | which, if they want to keep active, need access to compatible | hardware so they can be sure their exploits can be demonstrated | on "real" Amiga hardware | | The same is true for e.g. the Commodore 64, the Sinclair ZX- | Spectrum and a host of other popular systems. The Amiga was | revolutionary at its time and as such attracted those who were | looking for a machine to explore hence it gained a large | following. While the absolute performance parameters fall in | the dust compared to modern hardware [1] it still remains an | impressive demonstration of what can be done with a relatively | slow CPU combined with the custom circuitry and the OS which | made the Amiga different from e.g. the Atari ST. | | [1] pulling down from the top of the screen running some | program to reveal the workbench (desktop) on an Amiga 500 | (512K, 7MHz 68K CPU) preceded the Android notification shade | (which Apple later copied into iOS) by a few decades, using | hardware less powerful than what is integrated into the SIM | card in that same device. On earlier versions of Android (1.x | without hardware compositing, tested on a Qtek S200 which | originally ran Windows Mobile) this was quite laggy... | spamizbad wrote: | It was before my time, but based on what I can read and see | on YouTube, it strikes me what made the Amiga special in its | day was its pile of custom chips that aided graphics, audio | and kept assembly costs down by integrating tons of IO and | glue logic into a chipset. Everything else seems to built | down to cost keeping the overall system price from going into | the stratosphere. | | And while those custom chips are fine, they seemed almost | targeted at sprite-based gaming and cost reduction. Again, | I'm just looking at it through other peoples nostalgia, but | it seems like it just wasn't that remarkable of a machine for | general purpose usage. | vidarh wrote: | At the tine it was _the only_ game in town for "general | purpose" use in a sense in that everything else lacked | applications for entire large subsections of use that could | compete with what an Amiga could do out of the box. | | E.g you could draw higher quality art on an Amiga than | machines with far fewer colours or no bitmap graphics at | all. You could compose music on an Amiga that was not | achievable on any other computer in it's price class | without extra peripherals. | | And so on. | | It's simply false to suggest the primary function of the | custom chips was cost cutting - there was nothing that | provided what they did when they were introduced. Making it | cheap enough was certainly also critical, but making it | cheap enough is irrelevant without making it possible | first. | | I think the problem with looking back at this without a | very clear timeline is that things did move very fast. In | '85 it was astounding and revolutionary. By '87 it started | seeing some competition, and without considering that most | of the competition was too expensive it starts looking less | impressive. Then prices for PC cards kept dropping. By '91 | it was getting dated, and Commodore was desperate to | survive and get AGA and AA chipsets completed. By '93 it | was all over. | | In '88 the custom chips would have looked like just cost | cutting if introduced then, but when they were introduced | they were expensive and extravagant compared to what was on | the market. | pjmlp wrote: | And by 2000, sound cards and 3D accelerators on the PC | removed all the advantage, with BeOS looking like a | possible replacement for the Amiga generation, oh well. | | I guess those ideas now live on macOS and Windows | platforms, to some extent. | spamizbad wrote: | I feel like we hit this point way before 2000. By 1994 | you could buy a Pentium machine with CD-quality audio and | SVGA graphics on a fast PCI bus. You could browse the | web! Just 2 years later in 1996 you have 3D acceleration | and sophisticated graphics APIs mainstreamed on PCs: not | to mention the arrival of the Pentium Pro and MMX | extensions. | perl4ever wrote: | It was when the A3000 came out that Macs started looking | more attractive to me. Originally, it was like "4096 | colors, cool!" but once high resolution screens became | more common, flickering interlace mode and 16 colors was | underwhelming. | | 16 _bit_ color made HAM irrelevant and was more exciting | than pre-emptive multitasking and graphic acceleration. | | BeOS was almost acquired by Apple to replace the Mac OS, | but it wasn't, and it makes you wonder how history would | have been different. | pjmlp wrote: | Indeed, it would have been mostly C++ based, and not | offer the scenario of buying Apple systems as pretty | UNIX, as big alternative universe. | | Ironically there was a group of engineers at Commodore | that was big into trying to merge Amiga OS and UNIX. | | "VCFMW 11 - Bil Herd: Tales From Inside Commodore" | | https://youtu.be/-Zpv6u5vCJ4 | mrweasel wrote: | For people interested in building/fixing computers these old | systems are wonderful. Even without training you can teach | youself enough about electronics to reason about how they | work, well enough to fix them. | | Sure much of it is nostalgia and those who owned Amigas in | the 80' and 90' now have the time and funds to tinker. | | I still wonder about the custom chip. Could you just send a | handfuld to China and have them reversed engineer? Sure an | FPGA is easier and cheaper, but many want real hardware. The | custom chips are almost the only thing you can't get as a new | part. | hughrr wrote: | It's called Amiga Denial Syndrome which is an infectious | disease amongst computer enthusiasts. The sufferers of this | terrible condition genuinely believe that the Amiga still is | the pinnacle of computing achievement and that enlightenment | can be obtained by ramming the remains of an A1200 corpse with | various accelerators and hack boards hanging off it into a PC | case, squinting and pretending it's the A4000 they couldn't | afford in the 90s. This has an elite subcultural element which | provides completely new hardware like this A2000 and even new | software. None of these people actually have a working Amiga | for more than 5 minutes a month however so have to use a PC | running Linux or a Mac (but never evil windows) to support | their normal computer usage. | | Note this is in jest; as a vintage computing enthusiast I have | nothing but respect for this and may be speaking from | experience :) | perl4ever wrote: | Well, I'm not sure I see the point of anything beyond an | emulator, (is it even slower than the hardware?) but the | thing that sticks in my memory about the Amiga is how the | Roguelike games tended to have graphical tiles when most | ports on contemporary machines didn't. Specifically Hack and | Moria, back in the day. | amelius wrote: | > It's called Amiga Denial Syndrome which is an infectious | disease amongst computer enthusiasts. | | Is this related to the Reality Distortion Field? | dm319 wrote: | We were the original fanboys (A1200 here). | | Joking aside, they were amazing machines that people, | somehow, became emotionally involved with. | blippage wrote: | I sold my Amiga 600 in late 90's. I bought it in 1993. My | previous computer was an Acorn Electron, which had, like 32k | of usable RAM. I didn't get much use out of it. A friend said | he has an Amiga, and it had 1M of RAM. I was astonished as to | how much RAM that was. | | I saw a new vid on YouTube recently with a guy showing how to | use the Octamed tracker. By coincidence, the guy that bought | my Amiga all those years ago bought it primarily for the | tracker. | | The Amiga is a surprisingly capable machine. I saw a demo | where they booted up Debian on the Amiga. It was slow! It | just goes to show how compact the AmigaOS is. The whole OS | came on 3 single-sided (?) floppies, and one of them was for | fonts. Amazing, a whole OS on less than 2 HD floppies. | | It appears that AmigaOS is STILL being released commercially | . The latest release was 6 months ago. Amazing, considering | that Commodore died in 1994. There is AROS, a free version of | AmigaOS, which is still actively development. Development | seems to be slow, though. | | AmigaOS is available for the MK68K and PowerPC. I saw a | PowerPC version awhile ago. They're not cheap, though, which | is a pity. | | I really thought that an AmigaOS is combo with a Raspberry Pi | would be an awesome hit. OS development on Pis has been a | disappointment, actually. I was expecting more. Everyone just | runs Linux. | | Kids these days need 8G just to run Firefox, of course. | Symbiote wrote: | The Acorn Election was a budget computer from 1983, that's | not really a fair comparison. | | If you'd bought a typical Acorn in 1993, it would have come | with either 1, 2 or 4 MiB RAM. | | You can run the Acorn OS (RISC OS) on a Raspberry Pi. | boboche wrote: | Advances for its time is an understatement. In marketing, | people are trying to sell you an experience, i.e. iOS is the | experience of power and simplicity, Toyota is the experience of | affordable reliability, etc. Well Amiga had almost no | marketing, but anyone who used one seriously still have a fresh | memory of that powerful experience of being in the future, | making graphics only accessible (at the time) using 6 digits | computer equipment, audio sampling and playback so easy a 12 | year old could compose his own tunes, watching babylon 5 and | trying to recreate space scenes in lightwave or other 3d | software using only a few megs (few MB, as under 10!). | Emulating a Quadra in software, faster than the actual Quadra | using the same 68040 cpu, playing back video in real time when | PCs were starting displaying colors, etc. | | For some others, the demo scene, copy parties, gaming, BBSes, | first coding, electronics projects, name it. | | For me it was all of it, so yeah, powerful experiences that I | don't think I will ever see or live again because of the nature | of where and how technology is heading. Last time I got excited | with something with the same experience potential was when | Oculus launched their kickstarter, received my DK1. Wow. New | paradigm shift... but Facebook bought them and that was it for | me after the CV1. | | So we're going back to our first love, nostalgic, stable | environment and comforting :) | | It doesn't do stuff better than today's machine, but the fact | that its still usable in 2021 and that there's still a lot of | development being done to keep it fast and geeky shows you how | powerful the experience was for all of us. | | I'm happy I was alive and a kid at that specific timeframe, | because being a kid today I would probably not have 80% of the | tech skills I got now if it wasn't for the Amiga, forcing me | (as in fun) to understand everything low level and make me a | better problem solver and expand from graphics, coding, | electronics and creativity to cross-link disciplines. | | Now the only last thing exciting I can see before dying is | going to space, when prices are down by a notch. Kids today | won't live an Amiga experience, but will probably be able to go | to Mars. | | I'm glad I won't be nostalgic over angry bird, an xbox or an | iphone! | | Now I feel the urge to play that video toaster vhs | demo...again. lol. | the_af wrote: | I think the Amiga was way ahead of its time and inspired a | fierce loyalty in its fans. Also, retrocomputing is a thing: | working within the constraints of retro hardware has an | artistic/hobbyist appeal of its own. This is what compelled me | to buy a C64 again (actually a TheC64 retro clone with an ARM | board inside. I've no patience for the actual difficulties of | plugging ancient hardware into modern peripherals). | | There's even an enthusiast's market for new games and software | for retro computers. The target seems to be either people who | remember them fondly from their youth, like me, or even people | who were actually part of the scene back then! It's something | like a club for old automobile collectors I guess. | | As for uniqueness: everything about the Amiga was unique, | especially when compared with PC and Macs (or the Apple II). | The Amiga was built out of custom chipset purposefully designed | for the vision its creators had; these were not off the shelf | chips like with PCs. | | For a pretty detailed history of the Amiga, complete with hope, | betrayal and tragedy, I recommend you google the Ars Technica | series titled "A History of the Amiga". It will provide a | glimpse into what was so unique about the system. | an_opabinia wrote: | Retrocomputing is the programmer's version of cringe. The very | border of benign. | sys_64738 wrote: | Games of that era were better to play then and better to play | now. Amiga is such an integral part of computing history even | though the Mac/PC duopology tries to write it out of history. | | When you consider in the early 90s that the Amiga emulated the | fastest Mac FASTER than the fastest Mac, you get an idea of the | power. Maybe you need to live that time to realize how pathetic | today's technology landscape is. | perl4ever wrote: | >the Amiga emulated the fastest Mac FASTER than the fastest | Mac | | I remember when people would post this sort of thing on | Usenet, for years after most people had given up on the | platform. | | By the time the A4000 came out (late 1992), there were Macs | that also had 68040s and ran at higher clock speeds, so I | don't think it was remotely possible to do what you say. How | could a 25 MHz CPU emulate a 33MHz CPU _faster_ than native | under any circumstances? | dylan604 wrote: | >Maybe you need to live that time to realize how pathetic | today's technology landscape is. | | Okay, I'm a fan of the Amiga, but this is just too far. | Today's computers are "pathetic"? I remember playing with an | A500 when I was really young and didn't really know anything | other than a few games. I really got into Amiga with the | A2000 solely based the Newtek's Video Toaster. Then, | computers became all about video for me since. The things we | can do now in real-time with video blows an Amiga out of the | water. Toaster was all about SD video. We now do more things | in real-time with 4K videos. | | Your comments act like the rest of the computing world is at | a stand still compared to the Amiga of yore. | MegaDeKay wrote: | > Maybe you need to live that time to realize how pathetic | today's technology landscape is. | | I think that is going a little far. There are some incredible | technologies out there right now. What GPUs can do these days | is amazing. For another, the phenomenally fast SSDs in | current gen consoles like the PS5 will trickle down to PCs. | On the flip side of the coin, you have very capable | microcontroller platforms based on chips like the ESP32 for a | few dollars, not to mention the latest offerings from the | Raspberry Pi foundation. Really low cost boards like these | put the technology into the hands of anybody that might be | interested in learning something with next to no investment | required. Even the Amiga couldn't make that claim back then. | icedchai wrote: | It felt like things advanced faster back then. The Amiga was | a huge leap over other 16-bit platforms when it was released. | Time doesn't stand still, and hardware wise the platform | barely evolved between 1985 and 1994. AGA was the only major | change to the platform, other than faster processors, which | every other platform was also getting. Example: An Amiga in | 1994 had the same sound chip ("Paula") as one released in | 1985. | | The slow, incremental improvements weren't enough to keep up | with x86 and SVGA. Commodore really dropped the ball. If the | 1200/4000 was released in 1990 instead of late '92 it | might've been a different story. The 1200's performance was | hobbled by lack of fast memory out of the box and a previous | generation processor (68020, which as 5+ years old at the | time.) | | Early versions of the OS were also primitive and unstable. | That didn't change until 2.0 which wasn't generally available | until late 1990. | CyberRabbi wrote: | No one else has mentioned this but it's a growing use case for | a few in the retro scene: | | These older computers are still auditable from a security | standpoint. A pre-486 machine doesn't have binary blobs or | sketchy hypervisors that run in ring -1 that are under the | control of a third party. | | If manufacturers ever cease to provide general purpose | machines, one way for the community to bootstrap itself would | be from old hardware or FPGAs (if they can be trusted). | someguyorother wrote: | Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. | vidarh wrote: | Mostly it's nostalgia. It was such massive leaps ahead at the | time. | | But there's a lot of quirks that still stand out. | | Some of my favorites include datatypes - closed source Amiga | programs released 30+ years ago can load things like webp | images if they support datatypes, as long as you drop a | datatype into your system. | | And AREXX. The language is pretty awful, but the pervasiveness | of AREXX ports in Amiga applications and how normal users took | advantage of it is something I haven't seen since. | | The openness (despite the os being closed source) of the | platform is another one. Hardware schematics. A composable, | modular well documented OS where _everything_ could be patched | and replaced. Where people kept experimenting with new file | systems because you could just drop a file in and it 'd be | accessible. Or new device drivers, including virtual ones. Or | plugged in new system wide file requesters, because they could. | | A lot of it has more to do with the community around it than | the machines themselves. | icedchai wrote: | It's definitely nostalgia for me. I still remember the day I | got Shadow of the Beast for my Amiga 500, back in 1989. I was | blown away by the graphics, especially parallax scrolling, | and sound. I taught myself C on that machine (Lattice 5.x?) | Some of the things I learned still are with me to this day. | Before that I had only used BASIC. | | I later upgraded to an Amiga 3000. That was my favorite | machine of the early 90's era. Eventually, Linux started | taking off and around 1994 I moved on from the Amiga. | | I play around with the Amiga occasionally on various | emulators. I also got a MIST box some years ago (which is an | FPGA-based emulator.) IMO the FPGA stuff isn't worth it given | the speed of emulation you can obtain even on a Raspberry Pi. | LIV2 wrote: | For me it's fun being able to play around/make hardware for a | system that is still simple enough for one to understand | broadly how the whole thing works. | | The schematics are available for them & they're documented | really well | | People still make software & games for it for presumably the | same reason, then there's people who are into it for the | nostalgia and the games. | myself248 wrote: | This is huge. Even the Raspberry Pi doesn't have open | schematics or firmware. | | The Amiga era was the last good overlap of "you can know | everything about the machine" and "the machine can do useful | things". | squarefoot wrote: | Nostalgia for those of us that were there back then of course | plays a big role, but knowledge is also important. Had Amiga | won the race against the PC back then, today's personal | computers would be the equivalent of flying cars. Not many | people for example recalls that in the mid-80s we already | AmigaOS software for creating GUIs (PowerWindows), that was | years before the first Visual Basic was created. | | Edit: I forgot that although the OS was fully multitasking, it | lacked memory protection and management, so a rogue process | could easily crash other processes or the entire system by | writing parts of the memory that it shouldn't have touched. | Also, there was no such thing as resource tracking, so if I | malloc'ed say one kb, I had to remember to free it before | exiting, or it would remain allocated until the next reboot. | Those were limitations that I found immensely useful when | learning to optimize things. | kotaKat wrote: | Hoping this could push the costs of getting into Amiga hardware | lower. I never got to use an Amiga in "the day", and seeing the | prices continually creep and creep higher really discourages me. | unixhero wrote: | Just buy a Vampire v4, done. | renaudg wrote: | He's complaining about cost, so a Vampire is not necessarily | the best option (euphemism) | | A Raspberry Pi 4 with PiMiga is a great way to get your feet | wet (and might be all you need eventually) | kotaKat wrote: | I kinda wanted to play with a Video Toaster at some point. | fredoralive wrote: | Seeing as this needs the original chips taken from an Amiga | 2000, I doubt it'll lower much in the way of costs. | hestefisk wrote: | I would buy this if it were commercially available. Is anyone | looking to manufacture and sell this board? If yes how much would | it cost? | AdrianB1 wrote: | All the info is in that link. | duskwuff wrote: | Unlikely. This board isn't suitable for mass production -- many | of the parts required can only be obtained from another Amiga | system. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-07-24 23:00 UTC)