[HN Gopher] Peter the Great's Beard Tax ___________________________________________________________________ Peter the Great's Beard Tax Author : lermontov Score : 76 points Date : 2021-07-26 05:21 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (daily.jstor.org) (TXT) w3m dump (daily.jstor.org) | simonh wrote: | A digression for sure, but I really love the pseudo-historical | comedy drama The Great, in which a beard ban is a minor plot | point. It plays merry hell with historical accuracy, but is tons | of fun. | Eric_WVGG wrote: | I bought a few replicas of the pictured token for my friends in | Austin, all of whom have these Rasputin-ass facial carpets. | https://www.beardtoken.com | its_nikita wrote: | I cannot recommend this book enough to anyone interested in | history/russia/ or good stories in general: | | https://www.harvard.com/book/peter_the_great_his_life_and_wo... | | Peter the Great's life is extremely interesting, and that book, | while being a biography, honestly reads like an exciting novel. | There are so many "game of thrones"-like moments in his life. | lordleft wrote: | This decision -- along with many others inaugurated by Peter -- | contributed to the perception of a european/slavic bifurcation in | the Russian soul. Tolstoy, Turgenev, Dostoevsky and many others | wrestled with the implications of this centuries later. I daresay | it still shapes russian self-perception. | boxerab wrote: | Not just perception - there was a very real conflict in the | 19th century between traditional Russian values and western | ideas such as nihilism and socialism. Dostoevsky was such an | idealist in his youth, then turning his back on those movements | after being imprisoned in hard labor camp. In his book Demons, | he very much groks the dangers of these western ideas, which | led to the disastrous 70 year reign of the Bolsheviks | nine_k wrote: | Why, socialism was fine with most Russians, that is, the | peasants. Check out the obschina thing [1] which was the | traditional structure of non-noble country living; it's full | of communal and rather socialist institutions. | | The revolutionaries like the young Dostoevsky and a number of | other Russian left intellectuals were quite westernized, and | had the French revolution as an example, with its | franternite, egalite et liberte. (Interestingly, not the | American revolution which was hugely more successful but not | leftist.) | | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obshchina | soperj wrote: | If you take an objective look at the USSR from 1917 to 1990, | while there was a lot of bad things, they also completely | industrialized the country, literacy rates went from 28% to | 99.7% (triple it in the first 15 years, by trying to teach | everyone to read their native language first instead of | Russian first). They were the first country to put a man in | space. I'm not sure that it was all disastrous. | nIHOPp6MQw0f5ut wrote: | The west industrialized without gulags. | c-smile wrote: | Oh, really? | | What about plantations? Who worked there? Sigh, under | each stone of European squares you can find 1kg of gold | that came from the "third world". | etc-hosts wrote: | The West didn't have land hungry pre WW2 Germany next to | it. | krzyk wrote: | > The West didn't have land hungry pre WW2 Germany next | to it. | | Not sure if this is sarcasm, but I'll assume it is not. | | France and Poland send their regards. | sonthonax wrote: | 'The West' industrialised with slave plantations and | child labour. | soperj wrote: | Remind me which country has the largest incarcerated | population in the world? | krzyk wrote: | And also killed many people (more than WW2 alone), and | basically created dark ages for unlucky countries that were | "saved" by the soviets. | User23 wrote: | Most people with a regard for human life consider mass | murder[1] on a scale hitherto unseen[2], which is really | saying something given that the world had just seen WW2, to | be disastrous. | | [1] Thus not including battlefield deaths of soldiers. | | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_mortality_in_the_S | oviet... | danielodievich wrote: | I barely overlapped with both of my great-grandfathers but | fortunately one of them left his memoirs behind. | | in there it says that he ran away from home early and | "during revolution was just a street hooligan breaking | streetlamps for amusement". He did eventually complete | engineering school and wound up designing and building | ports and hydroelectric dams during all the heavy | industrialization and the war. He said he was happy about | that change that allowed him to become educated. | 988747 wrote: | You must ask yourself a question here: did they accomplish | all of that because of the socialism, or despite it? | c-smile wrote: | Idea was good. Socialism works quite well at critical | times. | | Just in case: pretty much each country, including US, | handles COVID problem in typical socialistic state way. | int_19h wrote: | Funny thing about Stalin's "socialism": he actually | reverted high school to being a paid extra, not free and | universal. | 988747 wrote: | Socialism is a perfect system. I mean: socialism is | probably the system that God uses to rule his Angels in | Heaven. It has only one tiny flaw: in order to work it | requires the society to be perfect as well, and most | importantly completely selfless. But for less than | perfect societies capitalism works better, because it can | turn people's flaws (i.e.: greed, ambition) for the | common good. | nemo44x wrote: | A planned economy is great when you have a few well | defined tasks to really worry about. But you can't really | become dynamic and resilient like a market economy can. | So certain goals, like getting everyone to read or | building a spaceship work reasonably well but it simply | can't compete with a market economy in the longer run and | dies a death of a thousand capitalist cuts eventually. | | The Chinese probably have it more right than the Soviets | in that they manage a few big things and then let the | market more or less self manage to a point so long as the | CCP is getting their cut and gives their blessing. | tenfourwookie wrote: | Stalin would sign pages and pages of names for execution | before going off for a nice weekend at the dacha, just | because, let's say for expediency. | | You cannot rationalize away the horrors of 20th century | Russia, certainly not with these bullet points. | | _So we killed 30 million people, but look! Sputnik!_ | shrubble wrote: | The 60 million people killed during the Bokshevik reign are | unavailable for comment, however. | soperj wrote: | Seems completely objective. | [deleted] | c-smile wrote: | That's exaggeration of course. Many but not THAT many. | | Story from my step-grandfather: | | He was a village school director and teacher in Ukraine | at times of 1932/33 famine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki | /Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%93...). With students from | senior classes he developed piece of farm land just to | feed junior classes - make real breakfast at list for | them. | | Each day he walked to school with knapsack - prepared for | detention, as all agricultural surplus should go to | collectors. All that was real, indeed. | | ... | | At WWII, he served as an artillery lieutenant, literally | walked by foot from Voronezh/Russia to Berlin/Germany. | They were crying "for the Motherland, for the Stalin" all | way along. And that one was also real. | | Later he was a father of an academic and two doctors of | science in USSR. | | History is really not that black and white. | jltsiren wrote: | Bolshevism was a disaster, but the traditional Russian | society that preceded it was not much better. The Russia that | overthrew its Mongol overlords never managed to develop the | social and cultural institutions required to form a stable | and prosperous society. Novgorod had them, but it was one of | the first victims of Muscovy. | | There was perhaps a chance in the 19th century, when | Alexander II tried to turn Russia into a constitutional | monarchy. The chance died when nihilists killed him and his | son reversed the course. The same ideas that gave rise to | social democracy in the West turned into Marxism-Leninism in | Russia. One was a great success story, another was an equally | great catastrophe. | hereforphone wrote: | The article states that this was part of an effort to reorient | the country's culture. That might seem strange to Americans / | Western Europeans today, but this was not an isolated case and | while it might not be PC to say so, this could be a constructive | thing (with the right approach and an amount of luck). | | A more modern example is Turkey, where Ataturk revised script, | clothing, education, and many other aspects of the country's | culture. While no one will every know "what would have been", | it's arguable that these reforms made Turkey more "European" and | less "Middle Eastern" - which I think was the intent. | | So, today Turkey is more like an Italy than a Syria (though that | is changing), and perhaps those reforms are part of the reason | why. | vagrantJin wrote: | > while it might not be PC to say so, this could be a | constructive thing | | That's called euro-centrism isn't it. And every westerner | believes wholeheartedly that it is the best most constructive | thing to do. So it is neither right nor wrong politically. | | But it does dull the world when every place you go to is Europe | in microcosm. That is a true vision of dystopian hell itself. | nine_k wrote: | You can remove the "euro" part from it, and pick any other | successful civilization which produced a rich culture. E.g. | Chinese culture influenced its neighbors to a very | significant extent, and certain traits of it were consciously | emulated, say, in Japan and Korea at certain times. | hereforphone wrote: | Spend a couple years in Italy. Spend a couple years in Syria. | Come back and tell me which you prefer. | ploika wrote: | The one not at war obviously. Being in Europe didn't save | Bosnia from being a pretty awful place to be in the 90s. | tdsamardzhiev wrote: | Our part of Europe is... special. | vagrantJin wrote: | Why, so I can visit the Lamborghini factory and pizza | restaurant? | | If you think my statement sounds like a shallow cliche then | I would remind you that a group of people connected loosely | by the idea of a state have cultural norms and traditions | that make their little corner of the world unique...and Id | say this surpasses the idea of materialism/unbounded | consumption that undertones every conversation about | "Europe Vs ...." measuring progress by how many cappucino | cafes per square kilometer is a rather dull way to view the | world at the very least. | FredPret wrote: | When people talk about this they simply mean that | cappuccino cafes are better than landmines, and that | Italy beats Syria by that good vs bad metric. | | It's not an argument that we should replace all culture | with a European facsimile, merely that some movement | towards the proven model for success is needed. | ceilingcorner wrote: | This might be relevant if world history began in 1900. | romwell wrote: | Italy wasn't the nicest place to be in during the 1940s, | which would be a fair comparison as far as war-torn states | go | sandworm101 wrote: | Countries are allowed to change. A country choosing to adopt | the ways of another is only evil if it is forced upon them by | outsiders. The leader of Turkey wanted to take his country in | a particular direction. That is a valid local decision by a | local leader. What is euro-centric is to dictate to those | local leaders, to tell countries that they shouldn't change | their culture as they see fit. Other countries are not | museums needing protection from change. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | Nobody pressured Turkey (or Russia, in the era of Peter the | Great) into trying to become more like Europe. They chose it | on their own. If you're going to say that their choice was | wrong, that would be rather paternalistic, don't you think? | simonh wrote: | I don't think an authoritarian leader dictating cultural | norms is really the same as a country 'choosing' it on it's | own. | MomoXenosaga wrote: | Well we know what happened. Europe rose to ascendancy in the | 17th and 18th century. I think it is fair to say he bet on | the right horse. | nine_k wrote: | A very interesting example of a similar but seriously different | process was the Meiji revolution in Japan. It restored the | emperor _and_ pushed westernization into high gear -- Western | science, technology, and culture was studied very intensively. | | Along with that, the traditional Japanese culture was jealously | preserved in other areas, so as to combine the best and most | important Japanese traits and traditions with the most powerful | and useful European knowledge. | | This is very unlike the effort of Peter the Great, who tried | hard to make Russia more genuinely Western and replace as much | traditional structure everywhere as he could. The success was | mixed, of course. | MomoXenosaga wrote: | History is written by strong leaders with a vision. In Peter | the Great's case it was making Russia a European power. | rolleiflex wrote: | As a Turkish person, we are reminded of this pretty much every | day. However, it's also important to avoid the cult of | personality: Ataturk's reforms did not come out of nothing. | Turkey at that point had been a cosmopolitan society of many | communities for almost a thousand years, many of which were | non-Muslim and some of which were western. That kind of | permanent interface was arguably one of the things that gave | Turkey the ability to lunge for a western, secular democracy, | and more importantly, manage to keep it (nascent as it is) for | a hundred years, up until now. | | Erdogan has been in power for twenty years by now -- much as he | would have loved to dismantle it, this is as far as it has | gotten. Imperfect as it is, if it manages to hand power off of | Erdogan in 2023 peacefully, Turkish democracy will have passed | the acid test. If that doesn't work, nobody knows. | hereforphone wrote: | Absolutely. Actually the reason I posted that comment in the | first place was to solicit reactions from Turks (I am not | Turk, but have spent years in Turkey.) The cult of | personality factor is high, and somewhat concerning. But | (maybe) understandable given what it's counterbalancing, and | the background of the people it's intended to influence. | hereforphone wrote: | PS - Excellent second paragraph, you're right - but I've been | hearing that "this is the critical moment" for years. Are in | in Turkey now? Where? | rolleiflex wrote: | There are elections coming in 2023 (as scheduled) and | possibly earlier if the opposition manages to force it due | to current low confidence in the government. All prior | 'this is critical' moments were either local elections | (cannot affect the national gov't) or sort of wishful | thinking on the opposition's part. This one is different, | because Erdogan is not only not polling first in a _very_ | long time, he is polling _fourth and the last_. | | It also is significant because the collapse of TRY to half | its prior value was both swift and for the first time ever, | visibly caused by bad leadership. | hereforphone wrote: | For fun I walked around the lise that was the polling | center during an election 4-5 years ago. There were _poll | workers_ caught stealing votes. There was a vehicle | without a license plate waiting _outside the front door_ | of the school to steal the ballot box if necessary. | | There is also a massive influx of Syrian refugees who may | be allowed to vote... and these refugees are said to | almost entirely vote according to the Islamic | perspective. | | I don't see Erdogan losing if the election were to be | held today. But a lot can change in a couple of years, | and as you say the economic situation may aid the | opposition. | simonh wrote: | The attempted coup was certainly a critical moment as well. | It was passed when it became evident many of the protesters | fighting back against the coup were political opponents of | Erdogan. Hopefully that's settled one particular question - | no more coups, even if it's against your political | opponents. | | The coming election is I think another legitimately | critical tests. It's not great that Turkey faces multiple | critical tests, in a relatively short period of time in the | grand scheme of things, but the important thing is it | passes them. | rolleiflex wrote: | Turkey's adolescence is full of trials indeed. Hopefully | one day we'll be able to look back at this and call it | life experience. | int_19h wrote: | It's not quite so simple. Peter often gets criticized for | borrowing the book on the parts he did like (science, | engineering), but meticulously avoiding all the parts he didn't | fancy - especially the political philosophy. Russia still | acquired some; it was simply unavoidable with sending so many | people to study abroad. But so long as we're speaking of would- | have-beens, if Peter didn't do it, a later monarch might have | carried it out in a way that didn't keep Russia lagging the | rest of Europe politically by a century. | DaedPsyker wrote: | It sounds like being ruled over by a socialite. | | I don't know anything about Peter, did he take anything apart | from fashion from his grand tour? | | It says he worked at a shipyard which is admirable but no further | mention of what impression that left. | ordu wrote: | All the later history of Russia was written in a narrative like | "Pyotr the Great was the first sensible tzar". Even communists | bought it. It says maybe more about who was paying historians | for their work, than about Pyotr, but in any case it means that | repercussions of his work lasted for centuries. | | I'd say, that the most sensible tzar was Feodor, who worked | before Pyotr, who worked on the same goal but much more | sensible, it was a patient work through decades, but history | remembers crazy kings, not sensible ones. | | _> It says he worked at a shipyard which is admirable but no | further mention of what impression that left._ | | He also learned in Europe how to perform tooth extraction, and | liked to pull teeth of members of his retinue. It is said, that | it was a great entertainment for him to found someone with | toothache. | vtail wrote: | Peter reformed Russian army, build an effective navy, won a few | wars, and founded St. Petersburg, among other things. | [deleted] | ruggeri wrote: | He was an extremely active ruler. Founded the Russian navy, | founded St. Petersburg. He was indeed also very interested in | all kinds of science and technology and tried to import these | to Russia. | | https://www.amazon.com/Peter-Great-Robert-K-Massie-audiobook... | | On the other hand, it seems that all the monarchs of this time | basically treated their land as their inherited, God-given | wealth. So in that respect, Peter and practically all others | were extremely ego-centric and shallow. Modernization did not | extend to democratization. | int_19h wrote: | There were still some substantial differences between Russian | take on monarchy, and what was common in Western Europe at | the time. While European monarchs claimed divine right to | rule, the concept of subjects' rights was already developed | by then, and not just in England; rulers required some | legitimate justification for the more drastic actions. In | Russia, in contrast, literally every person in the country | was deemed a slave to the ruler, to be disposed of at will - | a legacy it inherited from the Byzantines via the adoption of | Eastern Orthodoxy, and later reinforced by Mongol customs | during the occupation. | trident5000 wrote: | As someone with a beard, I just cant imagine shaving every | morning. Seems like a huge pain in the ass and waste of time. You | do you if thats your thing though. | cafard wrote: | In the days before the safety razor, not that many men shaved | every day. Supposedly it was WW I that created the daily | shaving habit in the US. Before that, it was common to be | shaved by the barber. | eth0up wrote: | > Before that, it was common to be shaved by the barber. | | Or.. the one who shaves all those, and those only, who do not | shave themselves | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_paradox | SuoDuanDao wrote: | That seems plausible - being able to wear a gas mask with a | tight seal was a matter of life and death in WW1. When a | habit like that can save your life, I don't imagine you'd be | quick to give it up after returning home. | tenfourwookie wrote: | It certainly would have been then. Today even sandpaper beards | like my own are quickwork with an electric trimmer. | | Have you ever tried trimming significant facial hair with a | pair of scissors? Holy hell is that tedious! | ASalazarMX wrote: | I prefer a beard because I'm lazy, but when I shaved, an | electric shaver made the process quick and easy. | simonh wrote: | Eh, for me it takes less time than brushing my teeth. | | Then again under lockdown it's more like once or twice a week | than daily. I suppose that counts against my argument though, | if it was so easy why don't I still do it daily? | dfxm12 wrote: | There are a lot of easy things that we don't do everyday... | We brush our teeth for health & hygiene. We, for the most | part, trim/shave our beards for fashion. After all, under | lockdown did you always get dressed up in the same way you | did before? | | Now, if it cost you money to keep your beard, that would be a | different situation and probably motivate you more. | cmrdporcupine wrote: | I find shaving pleasurable. Something about the ritual and the | smoothness and clean feeling sensation of my face afterwards. | | That said, I often grow a beard during ski season. Because I | just enjoy the mountain man look to go with my telemark skiing, | winter clothes, accompanying border collie covered in snow, and | beer belly. | wccrawford wrote: | As someone who shaves... Yeah, that's pretty much exactly how I | view it. | | I tried growing a beard for a while, but I found that it was | itchy, and anything I did to try to alleviate that was as much | work as shaving, or even more. | | Recently, I switched electric razors again and it's a _lot_ | quicker and easier than the ones I 'd been using (for like 5-7 | years), and it's back to "meh whatever" category again instead | of "Ugh, do I have to do this?"f | | Someone said it takes less time than brushing their teeth, and | that's not _quite_ true for me... But my electric toothbrush | says I should brush for 2 minutes, and my electric razor says I | should spend less than 3 minutes shaving so I won 't irritate | my skin, so it's pretty close to that. | ecshafer wrote: | Beards become less itchy the more they grow. Shaving makes | the hair sharp, and itchy. But if you let it grow out, trim | the beard, and such, a beard becomes no more itchy than hair | on your head. But there is a good 2 weeks of itchy. | wccrawford wrote: | A while after that it got itchy again, and I ended up | having to use special shampoo and "beard butter" and such | to stop it from itching. It ended up not worth the time, | effort and money. | anm89 wrote: | Coincidentally, I recently stumbled across a really great lecture | series with maybe 50 hours of great university lecture style | content on Imperial Russia and I've been listening to it as I go | to bed. Around episode 7 or 8 I believe he discusses this | episode. If anyone wants to learn about something off their | normal radar, I really recommend this lecture series. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qsss5phzpg&list=PLEETkM6vwQ... | | It starts off kind of slow. Id say the first episode is probably | the worst of the series but the guy's got a captive student | audience so I don't think he's prioritizing reeling in the | audience. | wurstman wrote: | Thanks for this, it sounds interesting | alex_young wrote: | This was one of the pet peeves of the Lykov family, descendants | of persecuted beard wearers, to the point that they moved into | the wilderness of Siberia for 40 years, missing any notion of WW2 | in the process: | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/for-40-years-this-rus... | divs1210 wrote: | thanks for this! very interesting rabbit hole! | [deleted] | danielodievich wrote: | Peter the Great built St. Petersburg and one of the most | spectacular palaces in the world called Peterhof | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterhof_Palace), a must to visit | when you are there. | | Peter himself didn't much care for grandeur and so had a very | modest building for himself that is part of the tour of the | palace, with lots of baths in it. There is a list of "Peter's | Rules" hanging on the wall in that "small palace" that were | enforced, very short, including: | | - You can have one manservant only, no matter your position [the | space was really small] | | - You bunk where you are assigned to, no trading, and no | complaining about it | | - No boots on the bed | | I love the reasonableness of these! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-07-27 23:00 UTC)