[HN Gopher] Fire use: The first signal of widespread cultural di...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Fire use: The first signal of widespread cultural diffusion in
       human evolution
        
       Author : harscoat
       Score  : 41 points
       Date   : 2021-07-30 11:29 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.pnas.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.pnas.org)
        
       | Andrew_nenakhov wrote:
       | In USSR there was a very popular children book on this subject,
       | "The adventures of a prehistoric boy" (Aventures d'un petit
       | garcon prehistorique en France). Central plot element was
       | mismanagement of the perpetual fire by the titular boy, which led
       | to his banishment from his tribe, and his quest to survive and
       | bring fire back to his people.
       | 
       | As a child, I surely enjoyed this story and would recommend it to
       | anyone.
        
         | xkeysc0re wrote:
         | You might enjoy this film -
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest_for_Fire_(film)
        
           | Andrew_nenakhov wrote:
           | Guy from _Twin Peaks_ , girl from _Commando_ , and _Ron
           | Perlman_! Definitely worth checking out!
        
       | somewhereoutth wrote:
       | Bad day for the rest of the animals when humans first learned to
       | control fire. Pretty much game over.
        
         | Andrew_nenakhov wrote:
         | Game over for other animals was the developer of cognitive
         | abilities and invention of speech. _That_ allowed humans to
         | kill all competing predators and megafauna, even without fire.
        
         | gogopuppygogo wrote:
         | Now we are using advancements in our control over energy
         | resources to make it so earth is unable to sustain human life.
        
           | bpodgursky wrote:
           | Ah yes, that explains why there are 7.6 billion humans now.
        
             | lisper wrote:
             | Give it another 50-100 years.
        
         | trhway wrote:
         | Once we learn to control antimatter it will be bad day for the
         | Galaxy.
         | 
         | >lead us to hypothesize that at the latest by 400,000 y ago,
         | hominin subpopulations encountered one another often enough and
         | were sufficiently tolerant toward one another to transmit ideas
         | and techniques over large regions within relatively short time
         | periods.
         | 
         | The study suggests pretty "rosy" cultural diffusion. Would say
         | capturing/kidnapping and forcing to divulge the secret qualify
         | as sufficiently tolerant transmission of ideas? Imagine the
         | smell of cooking meat coming from the other side of the valley
         | while you're chewing on a piece of raw meat under the cold rain
         | :)
         | 
         | I wonder can it instead of "transmission" be that the fire-
         | capable just out-competed the rest and dominantly spread all
         | over the place as a result.
         | 
         | Another possible interpretation is "genetic transmission"
         | instead of "cultural transmission" like it is suggested for the
         | stone tools here (while i don't agree with such hypothesis
         | (pity as it leads to a lot of interesting conclusions,
         | including ones about modern world), people do write scientific
         | articles on it)
         | 
         | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066817/#:~:tex...
        
           | neatze wrote:
           | The myth of the peace-loving "noble savage" is persistent and
           | pernicious. Indeed, for the last fifty years, most popular
           | and scholarly works have agreed that prehistoric warfare was
           | rare, harmless, unimportant, and, like smallpox, a disease of
           | civilized societies alone.
           | 
           | Lawrence Keeley's groundbreaking War Before Civilization
           | offers a devastating rebuttal to such comfortable myths and
           | debunks the notion that warfare was introduced to primitive
           | societies through contact with civilization (an idea he
           | denounces as "the pacification of the past").[1]
           | 
           | [1] https://www.amazon.com/War-Before-Civilization-Peaceful-
           | Sava...
        
             | EthanHeilman wrote:
             | I agree with your main point that prehistoric warfare and
             | violence was not rare.
             | 
             | I'm not sure I'd frame it as most scholarly works getting
             | this wrong. Almost all scholarship I've encountered in the
             | last 25 years agrees with the position that both
             | prehistoric warfare was common and that relationships
             | between hunter gather societies often included violence.
             | There is an open question of exactly how violent (extremely
             | violent, frequently violent), but one would be hard pressed
             | to find credible scholars arguing that mass violence was
             | almost unheard of in pre-history.
             | 
             | Going all the way back to John Locke in the 18th Century
             | and before that to Biblical understandings of pre-history
             | there was a notion that past human arrangements were
             | extremely violent. There was some trendy early and mid 20th
             | Century scholarship that attempted to argue that mass
             | violence was a disease of the civilized societies, but such
             | arguments were, as far as I can tell, only fashionable
             | because they rejected the assumed status-quo.
        
           | aaaxyz wrote:
           | >I wonder can it instead of "transmission" be that the fire-
           | capable just out-competed the rest and dominantly spread all
           | over the place as a result
           | 
           | One argument against that is that transmission is much more
           | frequent than replacement in human history. We have countless
           | examples of technologies (agriculture and writing notably)
           | being transmitted to different cultures, whereas the examples
           | of cultures out-competing and replacing others through
           | technology are rare.
        
             | trhway wrote:
             | >the examples of cultures out-competing and replacing
             | others through technology are rare
             | 
             | Alexander the Great - phalanx with resulting spread of
             | Greek culture over all the Middle East, Roman Empire -
             | countless advantages over the cultures they dominated,
             | Vikings - sea faring ships and navigation,
             | Columbus+/Americas and the whole colonial period across the
             | world, ...
        
               | aaaxyz wrote:
               | I used the word culture but I really meant population in
               | the sense that the original commenter used it (i.e. a
               | group of people replacing or displacing another, rather
               | than imposing their customs on another).
        
           | sudosysgen wrote:
           | We would see genetic evidence of that, but it's missing. So
           | cultural diffusion is most likely.
        
       | pratik661 wrote:
       | Fire and agriculture fundamentally changed human evolution to the
       | point where most humans won't survive without fire or agriculture
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-30 23:00 UTC)