[HN Gopher] We Still Don't Get Things Done ___________________________________________________________________ We Still Don't Get Things Done Author : gk1 Score : 241 points Date : 2021-07-30 18:16 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.wired.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.wired.com) | [deleted] | gexla wrote: | My app for a summary of things I have done is my time tracker. | | The time horizon for my to-do list is a week. Further out than a | week is probably a scheduled item which is a different thing than | a to-do. | | Everything else is an idea among my notes. My backlog is my | notes. It's the place where I go to jot something down and then | forget about it until something happens to surface that item | again. If that happens, then maybe I'll act on it. Maybe I'll | just add to the note and forget about it again. | | Anything on my to-do list which isn't done a week from being | added gets turned into a note, to be forgotten about. | | Information dense project task flows aren't to-do items and I | manage them in a proper PM app rather than a to-do app. | | I think it's important to be constrained with how you use todos. | My list is short and easy to manage. Even being memory and | attention challenged, it's easy to get a quick grasp on | everything I need to do for the next few days. | 4e530344963049 wrote: | https://trimread.org/articles/45 | kilroy123 wrote: | I'm always curious how others "work." I use the Pomodoro | technique myself, where I do a minimum of 8 sessions per workday. | I try to do 10, but usually, I'm somewhere in between. I do not | count meetings. | | Every day at work, I show up and do a minimum of 4 straight hours | of concentrated and focused work. | | I often get told things like: "I'm killing it", "I'm a high | producer", etc. | | To me, I feel like I'm cheating the system, and I work too | little. | | What do other people do? | sbaildon wrote: | Anecdotally from myself, colleagues, friends, blogs, and random | forum posters, 4 solid hours of knowledge work is right on the | nose. | | I work on my own time, starting almost immediately after waking | up with the sunrise. I get in 3-4 hours while the world is | quiet leading up to lunch time; then I'll cook some lunch and | go training. Post-lunch work is autopilot admin or operation | tasks. There are days where focus is amped up to 11 and the | brain fog doesn't set in--but those days are rare. | | I'd say that your feelings of "cheating the system" are | ingrained by a culture that doesn't apply to your profession. | bmallerd wrote: | I tracked my productivity pretty rigorously in college for | about a year. My maximum sustainable productivity was somewhere | between 6 and 8 pomodoros a day. If a deadline was imminent, I | could "crunch" and put in something like 12 a day for a week. | Interestingly, I would crash afterwards and can only do about 3 | pomodoros-per-day until my brain recovers. The average | productivity in the crash + recovery cycle was also 6! So I was | just borrowing from future productivity. | a9h74j wrote: | You should blog aoout "Pomodoro debt" | akcreek wrote: | In case it is helpful to anyone, we've recently started a post | series in the HourStack blog about this topic. A lot of focus | goes into time management strategies, but often prioritization | is ignored. It's quite powerful if you can put the two together | in a way that works for you as doing the right work is | preferable to just doing work. | | There are many prioritization and time management strategies | out there, but we intro some of the popular ones [0] and we'll | be expanding each of those into detailed posts over the coming | weeks. The first one about using the Ivy Lee method to | prioritize tasks [1]. | | [0] https://hourstack.com/blog/16-effective-prioritization- | and-t... | | [1] https://hourstack.com/blog/how-to-use-the-ivy-lee-method- | to-... | adevx wrote: | I have no system. I boot up my laptop in the morning, have a | coffee and answer all support emails. After finishing my emails | I feel like I've done a lot and start looking at my fun | projects (trading bot, IoT projects) Then a server error pops | up on Telegram and I realize I was supposed to rewrite the | image processing routine. Back to work, and up until late at | night before finally finishing this task. In short, event | driven task management. | megameter wrote: | Increasingly I have absorbed "work" into a three step feedback | cycle - something comparable to OODA but with a more | contemplative purpose. It's really intended for creative | projects but it scales and generalizes nicely to many life | things: | | 1. Principles - why you do a thing | | 2. Benchmarks - what defines success and failure at making the | thing | | 3. Mediums - how thing is made | | The starting point - the review - is often to-do list like. The | to-do list's function is mostly taken care of within five | minutes of heading out the door for a walk with out-loud self- | talking: "So, yesterday this happened. And I want to do this | today." Verbalizing it(while a bit surprising to passerby) | makes a huge difference because it does the "getting it out of | me" function that all these apps do, and then lets the thought | disappear into conversation without a List of Shame forming. | | But the thing I say I want to do is usually defined in terms of | medium(the specific actions I take or techniques I will be | using). If I agree I can drill down to specifics until I've | designed an exact step-by-step process. If I _disagree_ with | that it 's going to happen that I loop around to either the | principle(is there a good reason?) or the benchmark(am I | measuring the goal correctly?). | | Blockage can usually be identified by pointing to one part of | the cycle that doesn't work. I have to get all three parts to | cohere for an action to matter. So I will have days where I act | and then learn that the benchmark is wrong, thus needing to | throw away the result but getting a little bit closer to | coherent design. | | All of this happens outside the formal workplace, mind. The | principles and benchmarks of the business, after all, are | independent of my own. But it pushes me to find useful | perspectives and get away from hours-on-clock production, which | I needed to do when I started working for myself. I've ended up | with all my income deriving from investment, which could also | be seen as "cheating the system". I actually worked backwards | from the outcome(hmm, somehow that happened) to what made it | happen(identifying and refining how I operate). When I do the | analysis it's really clear that the times of my life that were | most stressed were the ones where obligations made me act, act, | act without being able to go through the loop, so now I'm | trying to apply it more consciously. | praptak wrote: | I am a huge procrastinator. After a long time of trying various | things I found out that getting shit done is a constant battle | that starts very deep inside the mind. I'm talking about the | stuff you talk with your therapist and probably not on the | first session too. | | I get stuff done only as long as I'm keeping the chain of | motivation from the inside the mind to the thing I'm doing. If | I start thinking that I "have" to do something, the chain is | broken, as it means that I don't really _want_ to do it. | | When my mind is in the "I chose to do it" mode instead, I don't | even need Pomodoro - I can consistently do stuff even if there | is some aversion. | | The most coherent writing about this I know is the | Procrastination Monkey series from Waitbutwhy. | TheFreim wrote: | During school I'd immedietly do all of my assignments. Id spend | anywhere from 2 to 6 straight hours getting the entire week of | assignments done. By the time I got tired I was done with most | of it and had time to do what I wanted. Worked wonders, while | everyone else was struggling I was able to get straight A's and | work on side projects/video games. | | Is the "real" world supposed to be different than this | experience? | jointpdf wrote: | I don't know what the real world is, but my experience as a | chronic procrastinator with ADD was the polar opposite of | this. I did assignments on the bus, wrote speeches during the | period before I'd have to give them, etc. I'm mildly messed | up from these habits now, but I did (mostly, with some | spectacular failures) get away with it at the time. | | If something captured my imagination, like certain writing | assignments or my programming classes, then I could | hyperfocus. | superice wrote: | I use a similar technique, combined with meticulous time | tracking of every and any minute I spend professionally. As | somebody who is self-employed, I quickly realized that working | 8+ hours per day is an absolute myth. I count any day where I | spent more than 4 hours in a state of focused work as a great | day, and weeks where I spend more than 20 hours a week are | rare. My personal goal has shifted from trying to work as many | hours as possible to compressing these 4 productive hours into | the smallest time window possible. Arriving at 10am at work, | and leaving at 5pm is close to the optimum in my experience, | due to coffee breaks, lunch, and the occasional goofing off on | HN. | | So no, you're not cheating the system, you are probably running | at optimum efficiency. The efficiency of the average employee | in terms of productive hours per day spent in chair is | ridiculously low. | | As a side note: I'm very much wondering whether I should insist | on 40 hour work weeks when I get to the point of hiring people. | I know there is a movement going for the 4-day workweek, but I | personally see more in a 6 hour work day. | Lightbody wrote: | Related: | https://twitter.com/tobi/status/1210242188870930433?s=21 | milesvp wrote: | I have found similar results in my time tracking. | | At best 2 flow hours before lunch. 2 flow hours after lunch. | Sometimes bonus 1.5 flow hours after 'tea time' (not | sustainable). Sometimes bonus 1 flow hour after dinner | (completely unsustainable). Basically 4hrs is sutainable. 5.5 | is pushing it. | | Also I've found if you don't take at least a whole day off | (hobbies that look like work don't quite count as time off) | then daily concentration with quickly deteriorates as well. | | edit: I should note that these are high concentration hours, | my data isn't as good for non heads down work. | sanbor wrote: | What values do you use for each pomodoro, short break and long | break? Also, do you estimate your tasks into how many pomodoros | will take? | kilroy123 wrote: | 25 minutes a session. After 4 sessions, I take a break for | 15-30 minutes. | | When I'm really in the zone I'll skip the break and keep | going. Then I'll take ~15. | istorical wrote: | 25 minutes then 5 minute break with extended break(15-30) | after 4? Or you mean 25 work, 25, work, 25 work, 25 work, | 15-30 break? | cheetor wrote: | I also do ~4 hours of concentrated work first thing in the | morning. As my day progresses, my head gets filled with all | kinds of shit (good and bad), and it's really detrimental to | not just focus but overall output. | | In the morning, my mind is fresh and more-or-less distraction | free and I feel hyper-focused even without caffeine. Also, by | doing a lot in the morning, motivation stacks up and "wins" | convert into more "wins" throughout the day | | After that long session, I'll usually take an hour break. I try | to make sure the last half hour of the break isn't filled with | any instantly gratifying content (reddit, yt, etc) so my mind | isn't chasing another hit of dopamine when I resume my work. | Anecdotally, I feel like this helps me | | Whenever I loath doing a task, I tell myself to do it for 5 | minutes and if I still don't feel like doing it, then I can do | something else. It's a pretty common technique and works | wonderfully for me. Something about my pride and not wanting to | give up after 5 minutes helps me power through | iamnotwhoiam wrote: | Someone like me! | | I've been doing the exact same thing for about a year now. My | quality of work is up, and so is my salary. I have more time | for family and hobbies. | | Whenever I'm stuck on a problem and my four hours are up, I | right down my thoughts and the next morning I find the solution | quickly. | | Either you and I are special, hyperproductive but easily | exhausted workers, or everyone else is just pretending to work | twice as long. | kilroy123 wrote: | It think it's a combination? No way anyone is working | productively for 8 hours. It's not just possible in the long | term. | crispyambulance wrote: | 4 hours, in my experience, is the absolute maximum that a | motivated person can work on a heavy task in a day. I can't | cite any study for this, but it's a number that I've seen used | by really solid teams, internally. Billable hours, of course, | exceed 4 hours-- but that's because billable hours includes | "boilerplate" work. | | 4 hours is A LOT. You can get a lot of stuff done in 4 hours. 4 | hours x 5 days a week can be sustained long term as well | provided that the remainder butt-in-seat work isn't too | draining/demoralizing. | markus_zhang wrote: | >Every day at work, I show up and do a minimum of 4 straight | hours of concentrated and focused work. | | It's a lot TBH. I'd laugh loudly if I can do that everyday. 4 | hours of focused work most likely will deleptes all of my | energy and leaves me drained after work. | | On my side. I work as a BI developer so a lot of time is spent | in meeting. A day with 3 hours of meeting is fairly common but | most of the time I don't need to speak so I mute the mic and | only turn my focus to them when someone called me for advice. | | A lot of time is wasted on things such as waiting for answers | from a team in HQ which is located at the other side of the | earth. Sometimes someone puts up a shiny new framework with | quirky DSL and dumps it on our team with little documentation | and you can foresee how much time it takes to "learn" and | "unlearn" later. I'd recommend avoiding working in a team that | has zero control of the tools and processes. | sgt wrote: | Not sure I would be able to cope with 3 hr meetings on a | regular basis. I try to keep meetings as short as possible | (15-30 min), and to have an e-mail thread already having | taken place in anticipation of the call. | markus_zhang wrote: | Yeah I do the same. Some of the meetings are not avoidable | though considering I'm in the middle of requirements | taking. For the rest I just ait through. | | It was a lot worse when I worked in the analytic team. | Pretty much everyday is 3 hours of meeting at least. | ausbah wrote: | I find a to-do is mostly useful for just tracking all the things | that pop into my head | everyone wrote: | Perhaps being so fixated on productivity is not healthy. The | whole concept was really only introduced to society along with | mass industrialization. It seems that for most of history in most | of the world most humans have spent a lot of their timing just | sitting around, hanging out. I'd guess we're designed to do a | certain amount of that each day. | polote wrote: | There is only one way to get things done [1]. It is just DO and | stop thinking about it or how to do it. | | Todo apps will not help you get things done, they will only help | you accumulate much more tasks that you can do. | | I mean how can some people think that software will make them do | more ? The app will not do the task for you. | | Contrary to what the title states, some people get things done. | But productivity is the same thing as loosing weight. It is very | easy to understand what to do, (eat less/work (real work) more | hours). But there a tons of business trying to sell you something | to achieve it. If you want to get things done, just do it. I | don't know what else I can tell you | | [1] https://blog.luap.info/the-only-way-to-be-productive.html | tshaddox wrote: | That article seems a bit silly to me. Of course the way to do | more things is to do more things. That doesn't mean "how?" | isn't a reasonable question. For example, it could be helpful | to read tips for inventorying how exactly I spend my time, to | help me identify areas where I'm spending more time than I had | realized. | | This article reads like "reading about how to get better at | weightlifting won't help you, because the only way to lift a | heavy weight is to literally lift a heavy weight." | polote wrote: | The problem is that "how?" doesnt have any convincing answer. | People who are GTDoners are not more motivated by the things | they do than other people. The only difference is they do the | work and spend the less time as possible thinking how to work | more, how to be faster, ... | rossdavidh wrote: | Should be "We Still Don't Get Everything Done". Obvious point, | but it is crucial to recognize. Lots of stuff gets done, just not | everything you thought would. Which is why TODO lists can be | useful (for me, anyway), but don't get any more complicated than | just a list (I use a chalkboard for non-work and a txt file for | work). | | 1) I need to not forget to do this thing | | 2) but I can only do one thing right now | | 3) put the other things on the list, and start working on the one | at the top | | 4) occasionally, the list gets too long, so delete things that | you've decided will not get done after all | | That's all I expect a todo list to do for me, and that is plenty. | The less baroque, the better, and frankly it doesn't merit an | "app". | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | I've found that GTD apps, TODOs, and even simple task lists, are | rarely effective for me. | | That does not mean they aren't effective. The Japanese | corporation for which I worked, lived by them, and they were | _very_ effective. | | But for me, I seldom need more than a couple of reminders on | sticky notes, on my desk. | regularfry wrote: | I think if it was only a couple of reminders, sticky notes | would be a general solution. It's when it's double-digits of | _stuff_ that you need something more structured. | throwslackforce wrote: | If we were actually interested in getting things done, we'd get | them done, right? It seems like the core of the problem is people | having priorities imposed on them that don't match their own, | actual priorities. When people aren't getting things done, | they're usually doing other things, their actual priorities, not | staring idly into space. (Usually. And maybe staring into space | is fine too). | | If your well-being or the well-being of others is at stake, then | you got to do what you got to do, and "get things done". But a | lot of this sounds like people feeling guilty about not going the | extra mile on things they don't actually care about. | | EDIT: Wow I guess this struck a nerve. | | EDIT 2: And I think "people having priorities imposed on them" | would also include people imposing priorities on themselves | without sufficient self-reflection. | throwaway803453 wrote: | The YC credo is about building something people want and shipping | your MVP ASAP. | | What I see time and time again with teams and people prelaunch is | a lack of a catalyst to ship their MVP. I've met many people who | have an idea and their MVP is 95% complete. Then things stall and | feature creep sets in for three reasons: | | 1) Your MVP will, by design, have technical debt. No one likes | debt. | | 2) Releasing means a shift from being a dev/engineer to being a | marketer and building the company that builds the product. And | you do this while also working on your technical debt. If your | sales stall, then you are stuck in "should I spend more money on | time on marketing" hell. | | 3) Anyone who can build something people want and create an MVP | has numerous alternatives for certain income. | | So as much as I'd like to ship my MVP next month I procrastinate | since I am also a consultant who bills at good hourly rate and I | can just do that instead. _Good_ isn 't just the enemy of | _great_. _Good_ is also a great hedge against the time waste of | building a business that is no fun to operate and isn 't | profitable which is why many MVPs never ship. | | Edit: typos, clarity | tvirosi wrote: | What if apps aren't the solution to getting more will power. | LVB wrote: | >Every to-do list is, ultimately, about death. | | This succinctly captures something I've thought more about as | I've gotten older (now 47). This is especially true around the | "Someday/Maybe" category in my system. Some items in there are | themselves nearly teenagers! And it is sobering how few of these | bigger items actually get done or even thought about in a year. | But at least I'm checking off dozens of minutia tasks each week | :/ | acituan wrote: | Good. When we die, we will still have a giant todo list, and | that's OK. That doesn't mean we haven't done things, it just | means the list didn't capture the entirety of our desires and | goals. | | Maybe the point of writing them down is mostly reflective; to | contextualize them as much as possible and do the ones that we | find most important by some unconscious heuristic. That means | there will always be uncompleted things. | | Also we have to see when we itemize things to do, we also | objectify ourselves as a doer of those things. Which is OK for | making things graspable, but ultimately we are not mere doer of | things, we are humans in an existential context. | | Maybe it is a good thing that we left todo items unchecked, maybe | that is our protest against being reduced too much, maybe that | procrastination is an attempt at gaining our humanity back, maybe | that resistive Netflix binge has some unconscious meaning that | needs to be honored. | planet-and-halo wrote: | Thanks for writing this, it's so dead on. Becoming adept at | mastering your time, attention, and effectiveness is | worthwhile, but so often we mistake the trees for the forest | and get caught up in turning ourselves into little efficiency | machines. | neilv wrote: | > _You can blame Zeigarnik again. The mere act of making a to-do | list relieves so much itchy stress that it can, paradoxically, | reduce the pressure to actually get stuff done. "People feel that | when they put all their tasks somewhere, they've already done | most of the work," Perchik says. But it's an illusion. The pile | of work is still there._ | | I suspect that this effect can work for you, without working | against you. | | For personal (non-work-project) tasks, I've been using a | variation of Todo.txt throughout the day, for both "to-do list" | task management, and scheduling appointments and reminders. | | I suppose this Zeigarnik effect described by the article might be | helpful, and not defeated, partly due to the priorities assigned | the tasks. | | Tasks are assigned priorities A-Z. I usually only end up looking | at priorities A-C (occasionally D). | | One effect of this might be that prioritizing a task as D or E | gets it off my mind (thanks, Zeigarnik)... _but_ another effect | is that I keep being reminded of the A-C tasks on days that I | could do them, so they don 't feel done (take that, Zeigarnik). | | (Some notes on my variation on Todo.txt, and a snippet of Emacs | Lisp that helps support it, is at: | https://www.neilvandyke.org/todotxt/ ) | moksly wrote: | The more project management tools I have to work with, the less | likely I am to work for or with a company. | | I have a somewhat similar stance on software architecture. Sure, | I'm TOGAF certified but if you actually expect me to work with | notation correct Archimare/UML/whatever and not just draw boxes | on a napkin you're either insane or sell a product with no | competition. | | This is anecdotal of course, but after 30 years of working with | hundreds of companies to supply our municipality with software, | we have yet to see a correlation between quality and "best | practices". It doesn't matter if companies do this or that | testing and use the full confluence suite or if they just pull | spaghetti out of their asses and support is a phone call... the | quality is the same over time, hell, often we get more from the | spaghetti companies than the "best practice" ones. You might | think that it's a short term thing and that the spaghetti and no | testing catches up, but it doesn't. Maybe because we don't have | to fund those 8 people, that you never really learn the role off | but it sure isn't technical, that sit in on every meeting as | opposed to talking directly with the spaghetti slinger and a | sales person? I'm not sure, and I'd love to tell people that | following this or that "best practice" is the way to go, but | that's just not what our data shows. | ohthehugemanate wrote: | I see it as a similar problem as we (humans) have with all | systems: we mistake the system for the actual solution. It's | not. | | You need to focus on the real problem at hand, and devise/adapt | a correct solution in context. Systems and frameworks provide | helpful tools and templates, but they all require contextual | adaptation. | | FWIW this is what I like about the foundations of Agile for | project management. The manifesto points all direct you away | from your tools and processes and towards the actual problem. | eg "People over process," "working code over documentation," | etc. Basically the people on the team should focus on working | software, communicating with the customer, and adapting to | change. Their processes, documentation, contracts, and plans | should all be aligned to that solution, not the other way | around. | | And out of that... we got millions or scrum certificate | weilding alcolytes who will tell you that if your project | failed, it's because you didn't do their system religiously | enough. God certainly has a sense of irony. | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | This is not unusual. Something like ISO9001 Quality | Management is literally a checklist of pleasant aspirations | which leaves companies to define the details for themselves. | | So as long as you define what "leadership" or "customer | satisfaction" (and the rest) mean to you, and you have a | vaguely plausible but not necessarily effective process that | ticks each of the boxes, you have a quality management | process. And you can apply for - and will probably get - | formal quality management certification. | | In reality you can have zero actual leadership or customer | satisfaction. But you have a _process_ - so OK. | GekkePrutser wrote: | Yeah a lot of companies go like "we're going agile" and just | do the tools bit with Jira and its Kanban and rigid time | management. | | It's more like ticking boxes and pretending to know what | they're doing than actual agile project management. | | So now we're stuck with a lot of overhead crap and even more | workload. And the system actually slows us down when we try | to adapt to a changing environment. | | Problem is mainly that this happened because the director of | project management really liked the reports from Jira and | thus the main reason for it all is to get as much data as | possible in there (notice how 'accurate data' does not seem | to be a focus :) ) | albertzeyer wrote: | I don't exactly understand your criticism on best practices. | | You seem to imply that UML or other project management software | are considered best practices. I have never heard that. Or | rather the opposite. _Not_ using UML is currently considered as | best practice. | | But maybe it depends who you ask. | GekkePrutser wrote: | Yeah I studied UML during uni. It took a long time to 'click' | and when it did I learned some useful concepts from it. Only | then did OOP really make sense. | | However it's way too laborious using it for everything and it | becomes a burden when things get complicated. For simple | things it just doesn't really help because they're simple | anyway. | | As a learning tool I think it was great. In production? Well | I use it every day. The book props up my keyboard on my desk | which happens to be 2cm too low :) | Mary-Jane wrote: | It's usually government types (DoD, FDA) pushing for this | stuff, and lots of it. The thinking appears to be, "The more | the paperwork, the better the product". | quartesixte wrote: | Credit due where credit is due: these project management | software companies have done a good job of convincing people | they need it. | | I've taken to using tools that most closely mimic notepad+pen | or whiteboard+marker. Increasingly I am finding that a physical | whiteboard, markers, and post-its are good enough. And if you | need to create backups, the image quality on any smartphone is | very, very good these days. | | The more time spent working on the thing that manages your | work, the less you are working! | p_l wrote: | To be honest, after playing with stuff like Enterprise | Architect, and even JIRA - they could be game changer in many | places I worked in. | | But that would require a lot less gatekeepng and other | artificial moats around them, and possibly a rather more open | organisation model which wouldn't fly with middle management | (even if your specific adjacent middle managers would like | to, they don't operate in vacuum). And that's before you hit | cost reasons. Or _cost of training_ , especially since | companies really, really don't like training people. | systemvoltage wrote: | If you've ever worked in manufacturing, real Kanban boards | are messy but organized for the people to know what's going | on. Every Kanban board I've seen is unique in its own ways. | Some use post-it notes and some specialized tokens that | magentically attach to the board. Design of the board and | layout can vary widely, but generally when you see one, it is | a workshop organization tool made by people who feel | comfortable using it. | | Take away is that just because they're not using an off-the- | shelf project management / WIP management tool, doesn't mean | they're not organized. | bluGill wrote: | Whiteboards are better in every way but one : a whiteboard | doesn't sync with anything central or remote. You have to | decide if this matters to you. If yes get a tool, if not | get a whiteboard. | Arcanum-XIII wrote: | I've seen manager using the physical board to lock people in | a room at their mercy... or to create busy work for them, to | justify their existence. That's seriously messed up. | | The whiteboard was good to move forward a discussion, explain | concept and other niceties. To organize work ? Hell no. | colechristensen wrote: | What they do is give middle management something to do. | | Often questionably necessary, middle management has a hard | time doing _something_ when engineers understand the product | and upper management has the right balance of setting | direction and entrusting decisions to the makers. So they | start asking the engineers to do things and get upper | management on the train of wanting reporting. Doing _that_ | with pen-and-paper engineering and people with context is | HARD... so all of these tools exist to make this middle layer | of doing work better. | | And arguably unnecessary people earn a lot of money by | convincing themselves and others that they _are_ necessary, | so companies get to be organized to have these high overhead | tools to support this high overhead style of organization. | | Now to be honest some level of organization _is_ necessary, | and _becomes_ necessary as the enterprise and product grows | in complexity, but very very few people work long enough or | with a diverse enough set of organizations to be able to see | what is necessary and when and what is not. | | If you hire people and put them in a position and tell them | they have to work a certain number of hours _they will find | or create work to do_. Oftentimes this work is not better | than doing nothing but the WASP work-ethic and general | cultural norms really can 't handle the idea that smart, | important, useful people can provide the most value sometimes | by not doing anything until they are needed. | xcambar wrote: | > general cultural norms really can't handle the idea that | smart, important, useful people can provide the most value | sometimes by not doing anything until they are needed. | | Thank you for this comment. I have had this is mind for | quite some time but I never could phrase it in such a | clear, articulate, phrasing. | Lightbody wrote: | Say what you will about Amazon culture in general (I've never | worked there)... but one of their leadership principals is Dive | Deep | | > Leaders operate at all levels, stay connected to the details, | audit frequently, and are skeptical when metrics and anecdote | differ. No task is beneath them. | | IMO this particular trait correlates well with a need for less | process / project management software. I really believe if more | people did this companies would be better off. | | Note: this isn't the same thing as micromanaging but I | understand why some people think it is. | reedjosh wrote: | I'm there now (for only a short time), and I'm remarkably | struck by how good the culture is, and it's the exact | opposite of their reputation. Maybe team dependent, but I'm | pretty happy with my manager. | krazyk8s wrote: | I'm having the same experience myself. I've been in the | role for less than a year, and the culture is completely | opposite of what I expected. My team and managers are | fantastic, the workload is less than a number of my | previous jobs, its been one of the better jobs I've ever | held (Although for all I know I've just had extremely bad | luck with jobs for the last few decades and not realized | it!). | Zedronar wrote: | I worked for two years at Amazon. My managers were not diving | deep at all. At least not more than any other average manager | in any other average company. | TheDudeMan wrote: | Dive deep is more for engineers. Managers can only go so | deep because they must be broad. Yes, I know it says | "leadership". I was there for 4 years. | Lightbody wrote: | I appreciate the point you're trying to make, but I | disagree with this. | | It's something that has frustrated me, as a manager, when | fellow managers said it to me. I feel like it gives | permission to managers to detach themselves from the | reality of their organization. | | The trick is to know WHEN to dive deep, because you are | right that managers also have to maintain a broad | perspective. | | But being able to sniff out problems and then dive into | them has always been the hallmark of a great | manager/executive, at least in my own experiences. | clon wrote: | Thank you for writing this. It exactly aligns with my | experience. | | When such a rant actually feels sensible and pragmatic, there | must be something seriously wrong. | | I don't mean actual engineers wringing bug free code for a | space telescope attitude control system. Seemingly they have it | figured out - their code does not seem to fall down at a higher | rate than bridges or office buildings. They have a method. | | But this method, whatever they implement, is surely too costly | for us regular chumps, at least provided your employer, as you | put it, has competitors. | robocat wrote: | For anyone wondering what "Archimare" refers to: | https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/archimate/what-is-arch... | jdrmar wrote: | This resonates a lot with me. I've tried so many todo apps, but | in the end I always returned to a simple piece of paper. | | It did bother me that paper is not very flexible, so I'm | experimenting with a digital 'paper to-do' version. If you're | curious, check it out at https://can.do :) | | Feedback of course most welcome. | rasengan0 wrote: | Yay! article validated, tried and true practice: pen and paper | | Welcome to the FPN Nuthouse: https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/ | cygned wrote: | I do mise-en-place (preparation) and use TeuxDeux as my todo | list. It's so super simple but such an effective tool, so | limiting it's not getting in my way. | | I tried everything else, every tool, every technique - nothing | works for me. I can't even use JIRA at work, I put things in | TeuxDeux or on a paper list, otherwise I will forget what I need | to do. | | I always wondered if other people had similar challenges. Maybe I | am too simple for tech productivity tools. | datavirtue wrote: | Classic. Users asking for an obvious and predictable feature they | will never use and that will only taint the app. We throw it in | because it is obvious and "you gotta have that." Resist. | 34qlgkaer wrote: | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | | covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid covid | imsohappy wrote: | What if some patriotic soul just shoots Fauci? | | Then are we done? | legrande wrote: | I swear by The Checklist Manifesto[0] | | However, it's worth noting that just because you didn't do that | one thing on your list, it doesn't mean you're a failure in life. | A checklist is just a rough guide. You can always delegate or | delay the more trickier tasks too. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Checklist_Manifesto | sokoloff wrote: | It's a great book, but seems more aligned to "doing things | correctly [preventing errors]" than to "doing things at all | [preventing procrastination]". | jvanderbot wrote: | There's a subtle point in controlling process to prevent | procrastination vs keeping a list of things to do in hopes | that helps you ``know what to work on''. | | Checklists are great at the former. | jvanderbot wrote: | Precisely this. Todo lists are a great way to go through | processes, but a terrible way to plan a day's or month's | activity. | truckerbill wrote: | What is a better way you've found? | jvanderbot wrote: | I mean, I do have a backlog list, and it is prioritized, | but my day-to-day follows a process not a todo list. I keep | a daily checklist of priority things to fit in: | | Speak politely, two morning chores, answer all messages | from my group, workout, read, tinker with something, no | coffee (I'm quitting), no drinks (I'm cutting down), | meditate, go outside, update the finances, write in my | journal. | | Each of those is about a 5 minute task or a daily reminder. | Read and Tinker often lead to hours-long focus sessions. | The key is to show up every day and remove barriers to | getting started. | | If you want to call that a todo list, that's ok, but I call | it a process-oriented checklist because of the way I use | it. | | I used to be better about keeping a monthly checklist too, | but pandemic has removed most the list. | adolph wrote: | That sounds semi-similar to the "Seinfeld System," a | method that highlights daily streaks. | | https://jamesclear.com/stop-procrastinating-seinfeld- | strateg... | adolph wrote: | Time blocking is one. If one doesn't structure time and | context, then todo items can't get done. | | Edit: | | Here's one implementation by Nir Eyal, author of "Hooked" | and Indistractable": | | https://www.nirandfar.com/schedule-maker/ | Tempest1981 wrote: | Adam Savage uses checklists as a motivational tool. Something | satisfying about marking things as done. On paper, esp. | | I could only find this -- with a link to another wired article: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20263850 | rconti wrote: | Yep! I use RememberTheMilk, and while I still have tasks that | are years old, I find it generally helpful. I like the | confidence of being able to mentally unburden myself of | remembering things (even if I usually still do) and sometimes | find myself creating tasks just to check them off, because | I've done them but hadn't added them to the list-- why not | feel good about your accomplishments? | | The reality is, many tasks, people simply don't want to do! | Doches wrote: | Skip to the end of that thought, and just keep a list where | all you do is write down stuff you've done. Soon you'll | have trained your brain to look around for stuff to add to | your "done list" | | (I do this, check out https://donel.ist for a kill-your- | todos-get-stuff-done app I built to help myself do it!) | slfnflctd wrote: | A simple text file works great for me. Sometimes things get | asterisks (or whatever other sophistry I'm hoping in vain | will help me actually prioritize according to some sort of | 'master plan'), but in the end what's done just gets "//" in | front of it and goes in the archive. | | I feel it does help me combat feelings of low productivity | and/or worthlessness at least a little when I can look back | on all I've completed. Otherwise it's more of this vague | impression of 'not enough' and the resulting general malaise | which can all too often become a tar pit. | agumonkey wrote: | Sometimes (regularly actually) i'm fascinated about society as a | system, so much fuzz so much ignorance, so much unknowns and | noise .. yet it kind works (massive crisis aside). | alpaca128 wrote: | The bit about the Zeigarnik effect was interesting, I didn't know | about it but it does make sense and matches my experience. | | But the reason tasks aren't done frequently usually has nothing | to do with how the to-do list is organised, and I'm not sure why | the app creators from the beginning of the article were surprised | about their checklist not being more effective than any other | method. It still doesn't mean it was useless. | jampekka wrote: | For quite a while I have not used any project management or todo- | lists at all. I usually have a project or few that I need to | progress and I just keep them in my head. Sometimes I book some | appointments with some other people which gives me a deadline to | make some progress. For some crucial chores I may do a temporary | todo-list of maybe three trivial items. | | Not sure how optimal this is, but I've managed to stay employed | and get most important things done. A plus side is that this has | a sort of automatic priorization and pruning: I just forget some | of the things or projects or ideas, and probably there's a | (negative) correlation between importance and forgetting. | | Perhaps people are on average a bit too preoccupied with planning | and "tasking up" and managing and measuring things to do. I've | found its often more trouble than it's worth. Also in anything | more complicated the plan usually collapses quite rapidly, and | having a strict task-structure etc may well cause people to keep | the wrong course for too long. | sesuximo wrote: | "In preparing for battle, I have always found that plans are | useless, but planning is indispensable." -General Dwight D. | Eisenhower | black_13 wrote: | These softwares exist to create stats to find out who to punish | Invictus0 wrote: | Great read. I feel like task lists are really a coping mechanism | we resort to when we are placed in a somewhat natural situation-- | that is, having an overwhelming load of tasks to complete. Once | the tasks are "out of mind" and on the list, then they can be | completed sequentially--sort the tasks by priority, and then do | them in that order. If to do lists were really about our life | goals and dreams, then the Seinfeld method still reigns supreme; | that is, do the most important thing you need to do every day, | even just a little bit of it, and note how many days in a row | you've done it. | | https://jamesclear.com/stop-procrastinating-seinfeld-strateg... | ChildOfChaos wrote: | It's a popular technique but apparently Seinfeld did not do | this, it was a throw away comment that became pop culture. | miika wrote: | When I get even little bit excited about something and act on it, | then it's easy to get things done. No tools required! | | Then again, when I'm asked to do something that isn't really my | thing or something is off, then I just can fix it with some task | manager (!). | | Sure, even the most exciting project may feel little bit boring | at times but.. as long as it's not all the time I let it be. | | It's not healty to be productive all the time. | jkhdigital wrote: | I still think David Allen nailed it in _Getting Things Done_. Not | the system necessarily, but he nailed the diagnosis of why we | fail to get things done: an inability to be honest with ourselves | about (1) the full scope and scale of the commitments we make, | and (2) just how little time and attention we have at our | disposal in meeting those commitments. | | Really, it's the same sort of problem that is described in _The | Goal_ and _The Phoenix Project_ , but on a personal level. | Calendar timeboxing feels like a solution that actually addresses | the real problem, although it is challenging to implement for | people who are low in conscientiousness (or have ADHD). | cortesoft wrote: | Yeah, at the end of the day we simply have more tasks than time | we are able (willing?) to devote to them. | | There is no technique or strategy to have infinite | productivity. | Lightbody wrote: | For what it's worth, we (Reclaim.ai - I'm quoted in the | article), have a lot of ADHD customers who tell us that we help | with time blocking on their calendar. | | In particular, the fact that we do it automatically seems to be | the thing they appreciate. | | Edit: First time I've ever been downvoted into negative | territory. Clearly I've embarrassed myself ;P | | Is it because of self promotion? I guess... seems weird though | I/my company are literally part of the article, I replied to a | specific comment around issues with time blocking for ADHD | people, and how automation seems to be a solve to the problem | highlighted by the parent. | | _shrug_ | granra wrote: | Looking at the landing page I can see only Google calendar is | supported with outlook planned. Is there any chance of | regular caldav support. I'm interested in the product but I | use neither Google calendar nor Outlook. | Lightbody wrote: | I absolutely desire to support it, but just being realistic | it is at least 1-2 years off, pending our overall success | as a company. The market just isn't big enough to justify | the R&D expense at this stage. Sorry :( | pySSK wrote: | Thanks for making Reclaim. I'm struggling with ADD and it's | something I'm able to stick to in longer spurts than other | things. I'll reach out on Twitter or by email with some of my | pain points. | Apocryphon wrote: | fwiw, I'm going to check out your service. The article's | conclusions are philosophical and introspective, but it does | give the practical finding that calendar time blocking is a | more effective method than simple todo lists. So trying out | the latter is an actionable item. Doing a guided meditation | session to emphasize with my future self would be another | step- wonder if that's the future of | meditation/wellness/productivity lifehack fads. | pantulis wrote: | In fact the only tool you need for time blocking is Google | Calendar --or similar. The rest is just convenience, if | any. | edoceo wrote: | Probably the claim about "a lot of ADHD" clients. How do you | even know? Did you ask?! What percent? Feels real BS to me. | skrebbel wrote: | "talk to your customers" is rule number 1 of just about any | startup, any business even. Why would you doubt that they | do this? | [deleted] | stevehawk wrote: | I feel like his sentence explains clearly that they are | reaching to comment/thank them and making the claim when | they do so? | Lightbody wrote: | Nope. Didn't think to ask, in fact. But then they started | to tell us. Here are two that did so via Twitter: | | https://twitter.com/sadbangs/status/1304685594430377985?s=2 | 1 | | https://twitter.com/etoile/status/1397257456468824065?s=21 | [deleted] | nuclearnice3 wrote: | Your reply to pixie was really nice and authentic. It's | gratifying to know people appreciate what you made! | tomrod wrote: | Neat. Do you have integrations with Element? | Lightbody wrote: | I don't know what Element is. Tell me more. Integrations | are a big part of our roadmap this year, so... maybe! | charles_f wrote: | This piece focuses on how organizing tasks doesn't increase much | the chance of doing the tasks, and suggests that other techniques | than digitalized to-dos yield slightly better returns. One thing | I think this is missing is that work is hard and time consuming, | and brain juice and time are limited resources. | | 1) You cant do everything. The more I advance in my career, the | more comfortable I become with abandoning things. It is almost | the same feeling as deleting dead code. I also realized that | there's a better chance that I will do something if I enjoy it | (duh) _or_ if it 's not menial. Tasks that are completely | pointless still have a chance of being done if they are fun to | me. Tasks that are neither will likely never be touched unless I | might get fired for not doing them. What's depressing is that it | takes some courage to admit defeat and cancel tasks, for some | reason. Probably the fomo or something like that. But the | psychological overhead of maintaining a pile of stuff is so high. | Look at most backlogs, featuring pages after pages of valueless | features that will never be done and bugs that will never get | fixed. Yet when you propose a simple rule that we should just | delete or close anything that had been lingering for more than | 1y, people look at you like you're crazy | | 2) work is hard, and procrastination is real: we are cabled to | minimize our cognitive expenditure. I think I can do a max of 1 | to 2h per day of hard work, maybe a bit more if it's something I | really enjoy, and there's probably a weekly cap as well. Doing | something hard is not something I look forward to (don't put that | on your resume). So when I pick the todo list, and have a choice | between "add this fun feature to your pet project" or "define | goals for next year", guess which will be done, and which will be | postponed every single time.. . I think the only way of doing | these harder tasks is by making them easier, less ambiguous, time | bound, more fun, i.e lower the entry cost of the task. That's | where some of the value of GTD and such methods resides - by | defining a mechanism that transform "stuff" into actionable | items. But even that is hard. I'm almost 20y in, yet I still | struggle to abide to a strict process. | | Work is hard. | loufe wrote: | I generally agree with your points, but 1 to 2 hours? When I'm | off-rotation I still find the time for at least 3-4 hours of | intense productive work in the day, and on-rotation I am | focused oftentimes for 10+ hours in a day. Perhaps it's | different levels of mental engagement but I'm curious why you | say, what seems to me to be, such low amounts. | sn wrote: | A todo list is not a plan to get things done. | | If you're serious about getting more done, tracking how you spend | your all your time is worth trying as a starting point. It allows | you to identify where your time actually goes and what you need | to do to prioritize differently (and if that's even possible.) | | I try to live a spreadsheet driven life. I have a workbook with a | sheet for my todo items with due dates if applicable, a sheet for | both prospective and retrospective time tracking, a sheet for | things I need to buy, etc. all in one place so I can pull tasks | in as part of weekly planning. The week usually doesn't go | according to plan but I think I still get more done than if I | didn't go through the process. Weekly planning also gives me | opportunities to start over fairly frequently if I fall off the | wagon. | Doches wrote: | This is _exactly_ why I stopped keeping TODO lists, and started | keeping DONE lists instead. | | What's a done list? Think of it as an anti-TODO list: your DONE | list is where you write down everything that you've, well, done. | You know that little dopamine kick you get from filing a neatly- | tagged TODO or marking off something that you've finished? A done | list is just that, and the only way to use it is to train | yourself to stop organising and just...get stuff done. | | I love it so much I built my own done list app: https://donel.ist | . It's 100% free, and there's even an API to play around with if | that's your thing. | bityard wrote: | I don't know why you're getting downvoted, but this method is | the only thing I've been able to stick with for more than a few | days. | | I have so many things I both have to do and want to do that | keeping a written list of them is pointless and demotivating. | Only time-sensitive things get written down, and that's just so | I don't forget them before it's too late. | | The beauty of this is that it doesn't need an app, just a | notebook or text editor. | [deleted] | indiv0 wrote: | I resonate with this, _a lot_. | | TODO lists don't work for me at all. I can't seem to remember | to actually check the damn things for what to do next. The | overhead of maintaining them also eats up time. | | The closest thing I've found that works to motivate and keep me | on track is SaveMyTime, which is a time tracking app. I used it | in a similar manner to how you describe done lists. I tracked | exactly what I've done, every minute of every day. The killer | feature of SMT is that it forces you to fill out what you've | done prior to unlocking your phone screen. Unlike TODO lists, I | have no problem checking my phone frequently :) | | This meant that I always had a log of where my time was going, | what areas of my life needed more attention, where I was | spending my time when procrastinating, etc. | | The very action of seeing that "What did you do in the last 15 | minutes?" reminder helps kick my brain into "That's a good | question, what _should_ I be doing now? " mode. | | Unfortunately I've since switched to iOS so SMT isn't an option | anymore. I can't seem to find a similar app. Most of the | existing time tracking apps expect you to actually set timers, | which defeats the purpose. Damn Apple and their OS restrictions | mean that no one can make an app that lets you show a screen | like that prior to unlocking either. | | I've settled for writing my own, private app as a replacement. | It shows a widget on the home screen (as in-your-face as you | can get on iPhones) with the same features as SMT. "X many | minutes since you last logged your time, here is a list of | likely things you were working on". | throw20210730a wrote: | https://archive.is/5uo8v ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-07-31 23:00 UTC)