[HN Gopher] Fairer Chess: A Reversal of Two Opening Moves in Che... ___________________________________________________________________ Fairer Chess: A Reversal of Two Opening Moves in Chess Creates Balance Author : sova Score : 66 points Date : 2021-08-08 19:36 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (arxiv.org) (TXT) w3m dump (arxiv.org) | JerryDot wrote: | This paper is pretty awful. | | Two amateur chess players guessed the best sequences of WBBWW and | then plugged the result of their guesses into an engine to | statically analyse the position. There is absolutely no chance | that they found the best options for either player. | | The sequencing argument that they make has no real foundation. | Introducing double moves could have all kinds of side-effects | which they later mention when showing their guesswork-variations | but skip over when trying to make the previous "logical" | argument. | | The only semi-useful sentence in this paper is the following: | | > More light would be shed on this question if the two leading | machine-learning chess programs, AlphaZero and Leela Chess Zero, | were taught to play with our proposed change in the order of the | 3rd and 4th moves from White-Black to Black-White. | | The rest can be summarised as "We thought of this potential rule | change and it seemed to us to be more even for black." | | If they had wanted to then there are only around 10,000,000 | possible game-states after the first WBBWW and potentially | looking at computer evaluations of the whole tree of | possibilities could be semi-interesting and definitely very | achievable. Probably better and easier to guess instead though to | be fair. | shmageggy wrote: | Lichess has an API endpoint for their cached analysis, so they | could have easily automated at least some of the new tree. | | Or they could have inserted a couple of `if` statements into | Stockfish, recompiled, and simply analyzed the root position. | | Even calling this a "paper" is a stretch. I'm usually against | twitter post threads as content but that seems about the level | of analysis that's actually present here. | ummonk wrote: | > If they had wanted to then there are only around 10,000,000 | possible game-states after the first WBBWW and potentially | looking at computer evaluations of the whole tree of | possibilities could be semi-interesting and definitely very | achievable. Probably better and easier to guess instead though | to be fair. | | This is what I was expecting them to do from seeing the | abstract. Instead they just examined a handful of novel lines | and evaluated them with Stockfish. An interesting proposed | rules change, but a rather low quality analysis of it. | YetAnotherNick wrote: | > Other expert programs, including Leela Chess Zero and | Stockfish, when pitted against each other in the superfinal of | the unofficial world computer chess championship (TCEC), give | White even greater odds of winning, but the outcome is still a | draw in the large majority of games (see https://tcec-chess.com). | Despite the fact that computer programs start play from 50 | preselected opening positions in the TCEC superfinal (once as | White and once as Black), it is remarkable that Black has not won | a single game in the last two TCEC superfinals | | This line is very dubious. TCEC SuFi openings highly promotes one | side over other as otherwise it was seen that almost all matches | ends in a draw. It could very well select 1. g4 and black will | win all matches. Also there had been an incident where Leela won | an opening both with black and white pieces and it happened only | once in TCEC history. | Asraelite wrote: | Something somewhat similar happens in the game of Connect6. | | Connect 4 and Connect 5 (aka Gomoku) significantly favor the | first player, but Connect6 follows a BWWBBWW... pattern where | each player places two stones per move expect for the first move | where only one is placed. It ends up being very balanced. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connect6 | fsckboy wrote: | this is amazing! | | white gets the first tempo on the first move, black gets the | first tempo on the second move, and then white gets the first | tempo on remaining moves, and black's chances are improved. | | I wonder what it would be like to continue the pattern? it would | drastically alter the game as there would be many more | opportunities to take pieces, but if it could be grokked it might | be fun. | | all the variants that breath a little new life into the game can | be fun for semi serious players, I find. | wpasc wrote: | To me it seems as if this paper's conclusion is hurt by its data | selection (of openings). It uses Stockfish and examines openings | like the Ruy Lopez and Queen's Gambit to evaluate the game. But | using this new gameplay style, presumably new openings would | emerge as predominant openings with the current very played (at a | high level) openings potentially falling out of favor. | | Many of the famous openings that are still used by top players | were elaborated and built over centuries. Stockfish is pretty | incredible but it can't solve chess (yet). Meaning, that if you | only examine the current most popular openings you can only draw | a conclusion based on those start points but you have potentially | omitted what could be new ones. Potentially, with this move | ordering there may be an opening for white or for black that is | extremely imbalanced, but the move ordering to get there is | currently beyond stockfish's depth from the start position (or | any starting positions they tried). Unless I misunderstood their | methods. | | Still pretty interesting IMO | mquander wrote: | I think maybe you misunderstood their methods? They explicitly | discuss the most obvious "novel" openings that wouldn't | transpose to traditional openings, like 1. e4 d5/dxe4 2. | Nc3/Nxe4, or 1. d4 c5/cxd4 2. c3/cxd4. | bonzini wrote: | Yeah, against e4 why would black play anything but d5 followed | immediately by dxe4? That would basically turn 1. e4 into the | Englund gambit (an awful opening starting with 1. d4 e5 2. | dxe5) with reversed colors, giving a clear advantage for black. | The next two moves for white would let him equalize, but still | the Ruy Lopez is unlikely to occur. | waterhouse wrote: | After "e4 d5 dxe4", White could play "Bb5+ Bxe8", capturing | the king. This new game is very, very different from chess. | bonzini wrote: | According to the rules in the paper the first of two moves | cannot be a check. The only good followup for white would | be Nf3 Nxe4. | __s wrote: | You mean Nc3 Nxe4 | tromp wrote: | Can the first of two moves be a checkmate, as in the | reverse Fools Mate? | | e2-e4, f7-f6, g7-g5, Qd1-h5# | reedf1 wrote: | As a casual chess player I'm not sure more drawish chess is | something we want? I know there has been some exploration into a | chess variation without castling which apparently can lead to | more vibrant aggressive chess due to the king being stuck in the | center of the board. | awb wrote: | Some famous GMs agree with you: | | > Some players, including world champions such as Jose Raul | Capablanca, Emanuel Lasker, and Bobby Fischer, have expressed | fears of a "draw death" as chess becomes more deeply analyzed. | | > To alleviate this danger, Capablanca and Fischer both | proposed chess variants to revitalize the game, while Lasker | suggested changing how draws and stalemate are scored. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_ches... | AmericanChopper wrote: | The 1984 championship, which was played with a first to 6 | wins format, had to be abandoned due to draws. It started on | the 10th of September 1984, and was abandoned on the 15th of | February 1985 after 40 draws and only 8 decisive games. | | The result was controversial (the championship match would be | restarted), and the other alternative formats that have been | used are also controversial. Such as the reigning champion | retaining the championship if a decisive result isn't | produced, and the current format where they play classical | games, then rapid games if it's tied, then blitz games if | it's still tied, then an "armageddon" game if it's still | tied. The most recent championship match was decided by rapid | games, which a lot of people basically considered to be a | non-result. | kevinventullo wrote: | This has always bothered me about soccer. 90+ minutes of | somewhat complex team play, positioning, footwork, and | endurance... and at the end of it the winner is decided by | penalty kicks, which feel like an entirely different game. | Tarsul wrote: | the problem with soccer is that good ideas to improve the | game (e.g. make the time stop like in Basketball: Always | when the ball is in play the clock ticks, when the ball | is outside stop the clock. This would mean less players | on the ground running out the clock with fake injuries) | are not implemented due to how the leagues are organized | (UEFA/FIFA etc.). Whereas in the NBA every year they | change the rules, e.g. the best rule change came a couple | years ago where they put the shot clock reset of an | offensive rebound to 14 seconds instead of 24 seconds - | faster gameplay. Everyone wins. | | Would also love different overtime ideas played out in | soccer, e.g. put players out of the game. When it's 8 vs | 8 maybe that leads to more goals in overtime or | something... also, there was a time/place where penalties | were shot differently (with running with the ball like in | hockey), so there exist opportunities to change but as | far as I see it there's an unwillingness. | WastingMyTime89 wrote: | Used to be a coin toss but penalty kicks are nicer to | watch. But yes penalties are a completely different game. | That's completely assumed however. You can't really | expect player to keep going after 120 minutes and you | need a way to decide which team goes through. | gerdesj wrote: | To a casual bystander (who at least knows the rules), castling | seems a bit arbitrary and so do the other "extras" - en passant | et al. | | What would happen if chess was reduced to purely "normal" piece | moves? What happens if pawns lose their initial two square | move? Obviously it would reduce the space of potential games by | quite a lot but would it reduce chess to draughts/checkers? | | Shall I pick my own stake to be burned at? | fogof wrote: | Here is a link https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04374 to the paper | you are probably talking about. Coming from DeepMind (and with | Former world champion Vladimir Kramnik as a coauthor), they | studied a bunch of chess variants by training AlphaZero to play | on them. In addition to no-castling, they also studied variants | where pawns can always move two steps forward, and where it's | possible to capture your own pieces. | zone411 wrote: | At high levels of play and in computer-vs-computer games, the | problem is too many draws. This paper's idea would exacerbate | this problem. If you want a fairer outcome, just do what's done | already and count one match to be two games, one with white, one | with black, and five possible outcomes. | | One interesting variant that I would love to see tried is no- | black castling (or no black-short-castling) chess. Draws would | count as wins for black (called Armageddon scoring). You could | still play two games (one per side) to get the most fair outcome. | This starting position should still allow a large variety of | openings and it would always be balanced on the edge without the | large dead zone of draws. | | Chess960 is also a pretty good solution that reduces the value of | memorizing openings. | andy_ppp wrote: | I've been saying for some time the first mover advantage in | football penalty shootouts should be removed by doing a Team | A/Team B B-A A-B etc. as they do in tennis tiebreaks. I'm not | sure if Chess would ever make such a change. | FinanceAnon wrote: | That would be a fairer format, but I've read that the football | governing bodies aren't introducing it as it would be more | confusing for people. | gerdesj wrote: | The football (soccer) offside rule is often held up as an | example of complication, so I doubt a reordering of penalty | kicks will be too hard to follow. | | Rugby union has several different offside rules - well one | rule but it is quite involved. Also they are laws! | https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/law/10 | andy_ppp wrote: | Haha, I mean I follow football closely and last season with | VAR it's been almost impossible to under the rules the Refs | are enforcing. | Someone wrote: | FIFA experimented with that and rejected it. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_shoot- | out_(association...? | | _"As part of a trial to reduce a potential first-mover | advantage, the IFAB sanctioned in March 2017 to test a | different sequence of taking penalties, known as "ABBA", that | mirrors the serving sequence in a tennis tiebreak (team A kicks | first, team B kicks second) | | [...] | | During the IFAB's 133rd Annual Business Meeting in Glasgow, | Scotland on 22 November 2018, it was agreed that due to the | lack of strong support mainly because of its complexity, the | ABBA option would no longer be used in future competitions."_ | | I wouldn't know whether that decision was the best possible, | but guess that the popularity of football makes them more | resisting to change than other sports ("Never change a winning | team") | dominicjj wrote: | As a chess variant fan, this is a cool idea that has a lot of | potential. I would like to see it extended to include say, the | first ten moves. Black may announce a double move any time during | the first ten moves after which white gets his double move and | then play continues with single alternating moves as usual, with | the sole restriction that mate may not be delivered by a double | move. | sobriquet9 wrote: | Why not let black choose color after first move of white? | seoaeu wrote: | Seems like that would just result in a lookup table of the | twenty moves for white and whether you should swap for them | OscarCunningham wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thue%E2%80%93Morse_sequence | | > In mathematics, the Thue-Morse sequence is the binary sequence | obtained by starting with 0 and successively appending the | Boolean complement of the sequence obtained thus far. The first | few steps of this procedure yield the strings 0 then 01, 0110, | 01101001, 0110100110010110, and so on, which are prefixes of the | Thue-Morse sequence. The full sequence begins | 01101001100101101001011001101001.... | sobriquet9 wrote: | That's not what the paper proposes, though. And doing that | would invalidate a lot of chess tactics that rely on | alternating moves. | fsiefken wrote: | Another way of improving chess would be kasparov10 or a once per | year chess960, chess480 starting position. | https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-problem-with-chess960 | User23 wrote: | One of the most amusing Chess variants I learned as a kid is the | one where white gets the full complement of pieces, and black | gets only a king, with the proviso that black gets two | consecutive moves and can move through check on the first move. | This means that black can capture two pieces in a single turn. | While white still wins with optimal play, less experienced | players playing white will get absolutely wrecked. | ogogmad wrote: | What about a pie-slicing approach? White makes the first move, | and black decides whether he wants to switch places. | ydnaclementine wrote: | For comparison, there's a lot of different ways to make chess | games more even between differently skilled players through chess | handicaps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handicap_(chess)#Main | | Paul Morphy (one of the greats) commonly played mortals a rook or | more down ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-08-08 23:00 UTC)