[HN Gopher] Yale study finds social media 'likes' train users to... ___________________________________________________________________ Yale study finds social media 'likes' train users to act outraged Author : hochmartinez Score : 75 points Date : 2021-08-13 21:37 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.slashgear.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.slashgear.com) | wpasc wrote: | dang, the article from yale.edu is just a few links down. | possibily benefit from merge with that link? the yale.edu article | has more to it and is the source institution | norov wrote: | It is not just social media; it is the way our society is | structured. Even if social media did not exist, the press would | still reward people who act outraged. Just look at newspaper op | eds and cable TV talk shows with discussion panels. Sports fans | know that ESPN sells outrage and living vicariously through | athletes/celebs as a business model. | | The crux of the issue is that society rewards attention whoring | behavior. I would love to see our leaders promote more "do, not | tell" behavior. | TrackerFF wrote: | Outrage culture has to be one of the worst mainstream aspects of | "normal" social media interaction. Then it spawned cancel | culture, which went completely off the rails (IMO). | schneems wrote: | > cancel culture | | IMHO "cancel culture" is just "consequence culture." | Unit520 wrote: | Outrageous, this can't be! But seriously, it is saddening | sometimes to see so much mindshare and engagement wasted on | poorly thought out "solutions" to whatever issue is currently | trending on Twitter. Even worse, the constant social media | outrage machine seems to reduce the inherent kindness that most | people have in them (before discovering Twitter). | hoppyhoppy2 wrote: | See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28174533 | saltedonion wrote: | Conforms to my personal anecdotal evidence on hackernews | smackeyacky wrote: | It seems that the problem is more insidious than this study hints | at. We know from the behaviour on social media some morally | righteous outrage is satiated by furiously liking or sharing | something that you might agree with, but most people just harumph | and move on once they've satisfied their itch to "do something". | | However there is a certain element in society that gets truly | over-stimulated by this stuff - the over-amplified likes and | shares are making it seem like the outraged community you are | aligned with is much larger than it actually is. Or more | precisely, the number of people actively engaged and willing to | undertake actions to back up their likes looks much bigger than | it actually is. This pushes our over stimulated friends into | over-reactions. | | This has now fomented a lot of extreme acts - hitting the | streets, burning stuff, occupying buildings, safe in the | completely misleading knowledge that your in-group is much larger | than you think. | | The outrage machine has been an interesting social experiment but | now people are getting killed because of it and it's probably | time to nuke Facebook and Twitter from orbit unless they start | taking moderation seriously. | xwdv wrote: | Nuking platforms isn't the answer, the real answer is to | educate the populace to recognize such phenomenon and train | them to not be misled. Otherwise new outrage machines will just | be created. | smackeyacky wrote: | I like the idea, but people seem very resistant to things | like being de-programmed from Qanon and the like. A lot of | the anti-intellectualism that underpins vaccine refusal is | grounded in a deep mistrust of authority. It will be quite | difficult to achieve without stomping on a lot of sources of | misinformation, which in this age is like playing whack-a- | mole in a 10,000 acre field. | | However, deplatforming seems to work. Nuking the platforms | doesn't seem too extreme to me given the harm they are | causing. | dionidium wrote: | I initially thought this was saying that train passengers were | more likely to be manipulated by social media toward outrage, | which probably rings true to anybody familiar with transit | twitter. | davesque wrote: | Makes me miss the days of phpBB. | holler wrote: | This is precisely why I opted to exclude voting and "likes" from | Sqwok (https://sqwok.im). | | From the outset I wanted to build a discussion site that was | entirely focused on live conversation, without the gimmicks that | have become so ubiquitous across the social media landscape and | beyond. | | In the real world we signal our approval of a conversation by | either engaging or walking away. Other people sense our liking of | it by seeing our engagement, not a cheap binary sticker we throw | up. | N1H1L wrote: | Years back, when Cracked used to be decent, there was an article | by John Cheese, which I forget now, wrote the most profound | sentence that I have ever read in my life: | | _Anger is addictive_. | carabiner wrote: | Might be this: https://www.cracked.com/blog/4-anger-management- | tips-interne... | | > The difference, according to the people who study this sort | of thing, is recognizing whether your reaction is designed to | actually help you fix the thing you're mad about, or just | satisfying the adrenaline and dopamine rush you get from | lashing out (the latter, after all, is what makes anger so | addictive). | | Apparently it's from 2099, somehow retro-loaded to present day. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-08-13 23:00 UTC)