[HN Gopher] Nail Your Startup Pitch: Use Pixar's Story Formula t... ___________________________________________________________________ Nail Your Startup Pitch: Use Pixar's Story Formula to Win over Investors Author : gmays Score : 192 points Date : 2021-08-14 16:22 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (startuppitch.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (startuppitch.substack.com) | renewiltord wrote: | Something about the images and formatting makes this look like | one of those "Buy my book for $20 and find out how to be a | billionaire by selling books for $20" Tai Lopez type things. | tobr wrote: | That way of boiling down Finding Nemo seems to miss _why_ the | story is designed that way. It doesn't describe anything about | what happens to Marlin as a character, just a few basic plot | points, and then in the end he somehow learns that "love depends | on trust". Uh, ok. | | If you actually want to understand why Finding Nemo "consistently | tugs at heartstrings worldwide", Craig Mazin used it as his | primary example in "How to write a movie", episode 403 of | Scriptnotes[1]. (TL;DR: the purpose of everything that happens in | a movie is to expose the hero to as much agony as possible, so | that the change they're forced to go through feels real. I don't | know what that means for your startup pitch, though.) | | 1: https://johnaugust.com/2019/scriptnotes-ep-403-how-to- | write-... | [deleted] | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _don't know what that means for your startup pitch, though_ | | The hero is your customer. If they aren't in agony sufficient | to prompt change, _i.e._ to your product, maybe your pitch is | off. Or maybe your target market or product need tweaking. | mixmastamyk wrote: | To my kid who was three at the time, it was a straight-up | horror movie. It had been a while since I had seen it as an | adult and didn't realize how scary it was. | systemvoltage wrote: | The moment you use emojis in your article, I am instantly turned | off and will stop reading. | tacker2000 wrote: | Agreed. This trendy new use of emojis everywhere, even in | somewhat serious articles is quite off putting. It just seems | juvenile and doenst add any substance or information to the | content. | whymauri wrote: | in this article, they are functionally equivalent to bullet | points for the headings and sub headings. | | but ok. | Animats wrote: | The blog posting looks like it went through a PowerPoint to | blog converter. | D-Coder wrote: | If there isn't already such an app, it sounds like it would | solve a big problem and make $$$... | ash110 wrote: | How does that affect the quality of the article in any way? | It's not like they're expressing through emoji, they're just | there as bullet points I get that emoji get a lot of hate on | reddit since emoji only comments were low effort and that's | justified No emoji at all in any form, that's just a stupid ask | whatshisface wrote: | It's annoying because it interrupts the flow of reading the | text. Let me read an emojii article out loud: | | Today I went to RIGHT ARROW the supermarket GROCERY BAG to | get some groceries VEGETABLE and I saw EYE my friend WAVING | HAND. | tchalla wrote: | How can you read an article filled with emojis without | being interrupted in the reading flow? | whatshisface wrote: | Practically, you can get browser extensions that remove | the emojis. The fact that brightly colored symbol blocks | interrupt flow will not change as the culture changes | because saturation = attention, contrast = attention and | uniqueness = attention are all fundamental principles of | perception. | systemvoltage wrote: | In the same way if there were using a purple script font. | It's just unnecessary decoration and I'll gladly pass even | though the content is good (usually it's not). | ape4 wrote: | That article does use purple text | cjsawyer wrote: | How old are you? No snark here, I am legitimately curious | karmakaze wrote: | I'm way old, and I didn't mind the emojis, and I'm not a big | user--I write words more often than use an equivalent emoji | in Slack. OTOH, I 'read' :+1: (the actual sequence of chars) | as 'like' and it isn't disruptive either. | konfusinomicon wrote: | I wonder if future archeologists will endlessly ponder the | meaning of emoji similar to the way we in the current age try | to understand ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics. perhaps a new age | Rosetta stone should be carved | wizzwizz4 wrote: | That's the Unicode specification, isn't it? (Though I suppose | that doesn't get the in-prose meanings.) | tomc1985 wrote: | Why though? All the emoji that people actually care about | depicts faces or objects with obvious body-part analogues | hummel wrote: | 100% guaranteed success in fundraising. You only need one of | these options: | | - Be a friend or acquaintance of the fund manager. | | - Be the child of an important client of the investment bank. | | - Study at a prestigious university together with other children | of the bank's clients | | - You have sold your previous business or already own a very | successful one. | | It is a fallacy to think that your pitch will be of any use in | 2021. It is 90% personal relationships, 5% narrative and 5% luck. | Not even the business plan is relevant anymore (WeWork and many | others) | andrei wrote: | I think this downplays things quite a bit. I grew up as a | middle class immigrant in Canada. My parents have office jobs, | but basically 0 connections (certainly not the ones you're | implying you need to raise). | | In university (which I paid for myself through internships + | loans), my cofounder and I just started coding on an idea, | which got us into YC, which helped us get in front of a bunch | of VCs, which allowed us to raise $3m in seed funding. No | connections, just lots of googling and talking/pitching to | anyone that would pay attention to us. | | It could've been the 5% luck you're talking about, but | certainly don't think that coming from a well-connected family | is the only way to fundraise in 2021. | infocollector wrote: | Any thoughts on how to fix this? Regulation will be gamed the | same way the current system has a problem. | dustingetz wrote: | bad investors will eventually go broke in 7 years when they | have no actual exits, but what's insane is that bad investors | aren't going broke, the insanity is insanely profitable, | presumably due to the macro climate, which makes them good | investors (or selection bias but what's the difference) | shadilay wrote: | It's not like this isn't a hole in the market. The problem is | the incentive to invest in better ideas isn't stronger. | bko wrote: | What do you base this on? | | I'm just curious how this works. Here are the two possible | scenarios I came up with. | | Scenario 1: Fund managers are altruistic and not particularly | interested in making money. So they give money to people they | know personally. | | Scenario 2: Fund managers are greedy, but success is | essentially random. So they are indifferent to their | investments, so they invest in friends and people they know | personally | | Is there some scenario in which fund managers are both greedy | but also invest in relatively crappy ideas just due to | happenstance of having a personal relationship with a founder? | vmception wrote: | The fund can spare losing investments, as well as have | investments where they sell all the shares at a greater price | even if the business doesnt do anything revenue-positive | TrackerFF wrote: | Storytelling _is_ important, and it 's a good skill to have. Just | learn a template, and apply it. | | (Notice how almost every "success" story involving entrepreneurs, | prestigious job offers, etc. seem to be some variation of the | Hero's journey) | vambllc wrote: | Please check out our visit for the best deals | https://vambllc.com/ | hiddencache wrote: | Looking at the pitch structure they derive, isn't it just a | variation of the standard: "problem > solution > benefit" | structure? | lifeisstillgood wrote: | There are two interesting (to me) books on Pixar - one is by the | (tech) founder Ed Catmull and is good on the storytelling and | hard work side, and a really good "other side of the coin" is by | Lawrence Levy who Jobs brought in as "the money guy" to find a | way to make Pixar profitable as they tried to land Toy Story - it | goes from a little way into the pre-production of the film all | the way to the IPO - and it really shines a light on the inner | thinking. No one really had a clue how to monetise things, the | IPO was a huge risk etc etc. | | Fascinating all of it, But for me the big thing to contrast is | how Ed Catmull described the IPO (how did Steve plan this, how | did he know? I am axed at his business acumen) versus Levy (we | were all terrified, movie studios refused to give us their | business models, the IPO could have failed at any moment). | | In short there is always several sides to a story, and if anyone | is confident of a future plan but has not done it twenty times | before, they are faking it ! | mandeepj wrote: | > a really good "other side of the coin" is by Lawrence Levy | who Jobs brought in as "the money guy" to find a way to make | Pixar profitable as they tried to land Toy Story | | link to book - https://www.amazon.com/To-Pixar-and-Beyond- | Lawrence-Levy-aud... | azifali wrote: | "As a startup founder, 90% of your job is storytelling".. No it's | not. It's solving a real problem. | reidjs wrote: | And selling the solution | RussianCow wrote: | Isn't sales just a form of storytelling? | tlogan wrote: | No - sales is much more than just nice storytelling. Much | much more. | cvwright wrote: | The first 90% is solving the problem. | | The next 90% is telling the story so people can understand how | you can help them. | Animats wrote: | That's so last-cen, when stuff actually had to work. | | Pixar's story approach is all "I am the chosen one". It's _not_ | about someone who worked to make it happen. This came from | George Lucas, whose stories are all about "the chosen one". | His success changed film storytelling. Too much. Before Lucas, | there were more "clawed their way up from the bottom" stories. | | I've seen "I am the chosen one" pitches. The CEO of Better | Place (electric cars using battery swapping stations) comes to | mind. He was a really good speaker, he was really good looking, | he knew several national leaders, and his business plan was | total bullshit. Better Place went bankrupt. | amelius wrote: | Chosen one is good enough if investors can successfully | bootstrap a ponzi scheme based on your persona. | | The trick seems to be to create a dream, let the perceived | company value increase based on that dream, and then pull out | at the right moment, leaving the losses to investors who came | too late. | exhaze wrote: | I agree with you about your point. In this case it sounds | more like lying. I believe that the best stories are also | honest with their listeners. | | Solving problems is incredibly important. You can often | succeed with that alone. The most successful ventures do | both. | hiptobecubic wrote: | Yeah but now you're saying,"Have an actual Pixar story" not | just "use the Pixar story method to spin your shitty idea | into a funding round." | rdiddly wrote: | I dunno, battery swapping sounds like a good idea actually. | If only the batteries were swappable... | petra wrote: | Battery swapping could have been a good idea, if instead of | telling a story:"We'll replace all the cars in the world, | we are already talking with heads of state", they've | said:"As a first step, let's concentrate on a small niche | best fitting for battery swapping, like Taxis[1], Build a | network/business, and expand from that". | | [1]Taxis drive a lot, so the savings from battery swapping | are much more compelling compared to the car costs. And | many taxis drive only within city range, so no range | anxiety. | Animats wrote: | Battery swapping was a bet against battery energy density | improving to the point that battery swapping wasn't | needed. Turned out to be a losing bet. | | For how Better Place blew it, see the Wikipedia article. | perihelions wrote: | Elon Musk / Tesla were leaning into it heavily for a while, | before they changed strategies. | | edit: Here it was, from 2013: _" Tesla Shows Off A | 90-Second Battery Swap System"_ | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5916980 | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5916451 | | https://www.tesla.com/videos/battery-swap-event (it's still | on tesla.com!) | Multiplayer wrote: | Tesla beta tested this in California a few years ago - | between LA and Santa Barbara. I received an invite to try | it out but never did. They shut it down a year or two | later. | | I think they are making good strides on fast charging and | decided not to lean into the swap. | chiph wrote: | It does. But in practice you'd have people trading their 6+ | year old battery for a nearly-new one (even if it took them | a dozen tries) to avoid the $12k expense of replacing it. | You'd have to build that scenario into your business model | somehow. | | I think a better business might be battery pack | refurbishment. Buy dead/worn out packs from mechanics, | replace any bad cells or fuses, reseal them, and sell them | with a 90 day warranty. | rdiddly wrote: | Why not treat it like a propane tank exchange? The | company owns all the tanks(1); you don't own the tank(1) | and aren't paying for the tank(1) (other than maybe a | deposit to ensure you'll return it someday). When you | swap it, you pay only for the propane(2) inside; you're | just buying more of the contents. | | (1) battery | | (2) electrons | notahacker wrote: | You'd need the deposit to be the price of buying a | battery, because unlike a metal tank a high capacity | lithium battery is pretty useful if you never use that | company's charge facility again, but if the status quo is | that the company only swaps their own serial numbered | batteries within certain time frames, the whole notion of | swapping an old one for a new one is meaningless. Sure, | sometimes people will wreck a battery but return it | anyway, like any lease business, but there's no way of | using them as a general bad battery disposal service | richardw wrote: | It'll happen, just elsewhere first: | | https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/china-ev-swappable- | batt... | | Good overview here: | | https://youtu.be/2-xWYScsvts | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _No it's not. It's solving a real problem._ | | Effective leaders tell the stories that attract and retain key | people, enable them with resources and put their works into the | world. This is a key difference between ventures and small | businesses. If the CEO thinks that is beneath them, they're | micromanaging a glorified one-person shop. | | The technically-superior badly-coordinated solution losing to a | well-communicated one is a Silicon Valley, business, political | and military trope for good reason. | motoxpro wrote: | And this is why companies still fail because the founders think | that "If you build it, they will come" | DenisM wrote: | I suspect that for every problem there are dozens of teams | capable of solving it, but only one or two will receive enough | funding and attention to reach the escape velocity. Investors | know it so they want to bet on the team that other investors | will want to bet on. | | Ergo your job as a founder is to convince the investors and the | journalists that you are the chosen one. Either that, or | bootstrap. | [deleted] | [deleted] | jjulius wrote: | How do you get investors to fund your solution? How do you get | the public to use your solution? | | Your solution is nothing if you can't build it, and nothing if | nobody uses it. | halayli wrote: | how will you convince skillful and smart candidates that the | problem you are solving is worth their time and risk? | bobsomers wrote: | There are plenty of "real problems" whose solutions failed not | because they didn't work, but because the founders couldn't | communicate effectively. | | A great solution without good communication is just as | worthless as an aspirational pitch deck with no solution. Both | result in a problem not getting solved. | agonmon wrote: | What "real problems" are these? Speaking from the side of | software Product Management it is far, far harder to make a | pitch deck into a solution. Orders of magnitude more | brainpower, effort, discipline. Easiest thing to do is sell | tech that is already working and solving a pain point. | lvl100 wrote: | Interesting. Please name me one great solution that failed | because of a pitch. | listenallyall wrote: | Vincent Van Gogh. During his own lifetime, he failed at | communicating or expressing the features and techniques and | genius of his own work. But later artists and critics | recognized and acknowledged it, and could effectively | communicate its genius and importance to curators and the | public. The work itself, obviously, didn't change, only the | story around it did. | dreyfan wrote: | There's a large body of people, particularly here, who measure | success by how much money you can raise, and nothing whatsoever | about actually running a viable business. | nowherebeen wrote: | I think part of the problem is motivation. I equate the | people that strive for VC approach just want to get rich. | They don't care about their employees or their users; they | are a means to an end. Raising money assures them no matter | what happens to the company they will have a payout even with | liquidation preference. Not all VC raises are bad given the | right motivation, but more often than not greed comes into | the calculation. | cellis wrote: | I mean, the alternative is to grind out an eking existence | on nights and weekends until you're bootstrap profitable | and then a "Chosen One" gets funding, or a FAANG comes | along and eats your little niche for breakfast...the | motivation for raising funding comes from survival | instincts. | dreyfan wrote: | Absolutely, fundraising is often necessary. The problem | is when it becomes the hallmark of success instead of | simply a means to an end. | [deleted] | izgzhen wrote: | Both options work, but you have to choose one style depending | on the stage and type of the startup. | | If you are founding a new coffee shop, or a trading company, | probably you should spend more time working on the actual | problem. But if you are founding a future tech (eg SpaceX at | its beginning) or anything that requires huge capital or fast | scaling in team size, you should spend more time on getting | everyone buying the story and provides you with talent and | capital to actually solve it. | madrox wrote: | It's remarkable how many real problems can be solved with a | good story. Storytelling is how people who don't do things | themselves can direct larger numbers of people to do what you | need. | exhaze wrote: | Why is storytelling aka communicating not a "real problem"? | norov wrote: | That is what we're told before entering academia and small | business/non-profit ownership. But lo and behold in reality | most of one's time is spent chasing grants, contracts, and | other funding. | lpolovets wrote: | In many ways, storytelling IS a key part of a founder's job. | You're often pitching your company to someone: a prospective | customer or employee, an investor, a journalist, a vendor, etc. | The better you are at this, the better your company will do. | This isn't a hard rule, and there are lots of counterexamples | on both sides, but this has been mostly true in my experience. | | FWIW my venture fund is an investor in ~150 companies, and I've | run correlations for company success vs. a bunch of company | attributes. "Founder's ability to pitch and sell" is one of a | very small number of positive correlations that I've found over | the last decade. | dustingetz wrote: | what other correlations with success? | tlogan wrote: | Kind true. There are only two jobs of the CEO: hire and sell. | Sure hiring and selling need some storytelling but that is | just a very small part. There are things like integrity, | vision, etc. | | So I agree but I'm concern that focusing solely on "pitch and | sell" is what gave us Nikola, Theranos, ... | dfee wrote: | > Sure hiring and selling need some storytelling but that | is just a very small part. | | I've always known storytelling to be fundamental to sales. | So much so, that when I first went through sales training a | decade ago it was predicated on "customer centrism" (as in | customer centric selling) and punctuated by days worth of | storytelling foundations. | sgustard wrote: | > jobs of the CEO: hire and sell | | I would add identifying a market, conceiving a product and | achieving product-market fit to that list. | crazygringo wrote: | > _Sure hiring and selling need some storytelling but that | is just a very small part._ | | I beg to disagree -- storytelling is the _main_ part of | hiring and selling. | | Hiring is convincing the employee you want why this company | is the next chapter in their personal story, and how they | fit into the story of the company and the product. | Storytelling is the creation of meaning, and people take | jobs because of what they mean for your life. For some | people, that meaning is about making the world a better | place, while for other's it's about how this job will | generate more cold hard cash than you could anywhere else. | | Similarly, selling is telling and justifying the story of | how this product will change the customer's life for the | better. | | Integrity? Vision? Technical specifications? _All part of | the story you 're telling_. | | Not all jobs involve story. If you're building an | algorithm, story doesn't really factor into it. But | _convincing people_ is always done _through a story_ -- | "here's why X is better than Y". So to whatever extent your | job in convincing people, it's about communicating story. | | CEO's do other things too. Deciding which strategy they | want to pursue isn't story, it's strategy. But then | convincing everyone else to _go along_ with the strategy -- | that 's story. | tlogan wrote: | I guess I have much broader definition of sales and | hiring. So I think we are saying the same. | | Selling includes includes finding market, indetifing | right people to sell to, product market fit, should we | sell X or Y, etc. But the goal is to make money. If CEO | does only storytelling then it is a scam. | | Hiring is also much more complex then just convincing | some person to join your company. Which person? How to | find them? Location? Are they too expensive? Can they | recuirt more? | | Anyway my grandfather always told me that is you want to | understand how companies work just like how the oldest | profession in the world works. So what is responsibility | of the pimp? Sell and hire. | HWR_14 wrote: | > I beg to disagree -- storytelling is the main part of | hiring and selling. | | If your goal is to hire a person or sell a product, yes. | I think what the OP was saying is that they are a small | part because of other ethical concerns. Like, the OP was | saying that selling many units of snakeoil is a failure | because it's a scam. Or hiring contractors and motivating | them to work hard and then using fine print to screw them | out of their profit sharing (e.g. Hollywood accounting) | is a failure. | busyant wrote: | I had this realization somewhere in life. Many jobs (not just | CEO) are highly dependent on "story telling" in a general | sense. Which is a stylish way of saying, "being able to | explain yourself and your motivations." | | In grad school (molecular biology/genetics), various lab | members would return from scientific conferences and the most | common comment was "You should have heard <so-and-so's | research talk>. She had a great story." | | It made an impression on me. You can do the best research, | make the best product, write the cleanest code, etc. But you | will suffer if you can't tell the story. | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | The famous ad agency Widen and Kennedy (they came up with | Just Do It among other famous campaigns) has the slogan | "The best story wins." | | In the end doing anything non trivial requires | collaboration, and the way to create that is to tell your | story. | spoonjim wrote: | Problems have lots of solutions. Often a company looking for | say "SaaS application to streamline expense processing" has 50+ | options. How they pick one from that 50 has more to do with how | memorable the company is (storytelling) than the features | (engineering). | goatherders wrote: | Lol. Most startups don't solve any problem, and many that do | are solving a problem advertiser's have (not users). | qwertox wrote: | It's probably related to the Pareto principle. | 123pie123 wrote: | Humans are hardwired in to stories and story telling. they're the | most effective way of communicating. | | I try and get a little stories into my work comms (given enough | time) | | brief overview of how the project is going - story | | technical document - story | | It can be fun to write as well. It doesn't have to a childrens | type of story either, read some short stories and get some good | ideas | | although being too creative is sometime seen as not professional. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-08-14 23:00 UTC)