[HN Gopher] ASML, a $300B Dutch firm, makes the machines that ma... ___________________________________________________________________ ASML, a $300B Dutch firm, makes the machines that make semiconductors Author : deegles Score : 336 points Date : 2021-08-22 16:16 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | greenfellowman wrote: | I was bullish on Cymer back in the mid to late 90s. The stock did | nothing (well maybe doubled) until ASML bought the m, perhaps | then doubling the stock price. I was so frustrated because | Cymer's light source was the enabler of smaller and faster chips. | Anyone have a theory why Cymer never had a great ROI, compared to | other equipment makers? Nikon and Cannon were already enormous, | and Applied Materials, KLA-tencore, and others were already big | and faced competition. | dharma1 wrote: | What's next after EUV? X-ray? | relaxing wrote: | There are a few candidates including X-rays. There's still | plenty of gains to be made in EUV technology before we get | there though. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next-generation_lithography | devoutsalsa wrote: | I was thinking that it's inefficient to transport equipment from | the Netherlands to mostly Asia, but any place they'd be located | would be importing part from around the world. And the cost to | ship one of these things is probably a rounding error in the | price. | | It'd be interesting for them to partner with Antonov to build a | second An-225. Maybe the economics would make sense instead of | needing to ship via multiple 747s. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-225_Mriya | qeternity wrote: | I think you answered your own question: 747s are a stable, | mature platform. Shipping is a rather insignificant cost, so it | doesn't make sense to take risks unnecessarily. | FlorianRappl wrote: | ASML is a great company. What should be stressed is that the | lenses are coming from Zeiss SMT, which is a strategic partner of | ASML since 1997. In fact, they are so important that ASML bought | a significant part of the Carl Zeiss subsidiary some years ago. | You can't get a pretty good video about the relationship and EUV | at: https://www.zeiss.com/semiconductor-manufacturing- | technology... | Keyframe wrote: | Schott (glass) / Zeiss (lens) combo is extremely important in a | lot of industries. Most people probably heard about them | through photography or spectacles. | royjacobs wrote: | Ah yes, ASML. I have a number of friends and ex-colleagues who | work there. Unsurprisingly, due to their importance, ASML are | extremely well-known inside of the Netherlands. It's one of those | companies that spun out of Philips Electronics and became very | successful (NXP is another good example). | | A lot of research and development is still going on in the area | where Philips had their research labs. If you're curious to see | what kind of high-tech is being worked on in the "Dutch silicon | valley" I suggest you Google "Brainport Eindhoven" or "High Tech | Campus Eindhoven". | as1mov wrote: | Kinda off-topic but what's it like working at ASML? They are | hiring for a lot of software roles at the moment. I've been | mulling about applying there but from the outside it looks very | bureaucratic (at least that's what the Glassdoor reviews seem | to indicate). | br4m wrote: | As someone who currently works there it is indeed | bureaucratic. But I also feel like it is an environment that | focuses less on cost/money and optimizes for the highest | quality. I.e., there is room to explore the best way of doing | something and there is less pressure to do it ASAP or for the | lowest price. | as1mov wrote: | Ah fair enough, thanks for the insight. I've worked in a | heavily regulated domain for the past few years and just | wanted a change to something different. Perhaps I'll still | give it a shot if nothing else turns up. | megablast wrote: | So, just like any rich company really. | nzmsv wrote: | No, companies can be rich and still have a culture of | cutting corners and rushing stuff to market. | whazor wrote: | It really is. The machines are highly sophisticated and | downtime is very costly. Code bases are heavily documented | and have a bureaucratic process to protect them. ASML does | have less crucial software projects that have a more normal | process. | burntoutfire wrote: | Some of the jobs look pretty cool, can you share what is | the salary range to be expected? The website is silent | about that, which in Europe almost always means | underwhelming numbers. | teekert wrote: | Of course you will just get help when you get cancer and | homeless people get help when they need it. It takes some | money away from the higher paying jobs, and may make the | salary underwhelming compared to the US. But then again, | you won't need a million dollar house in the right | neighborhood to get your kids into a decent school. | dan-robertson wrote: | The US has taxes too (and their government does plenty of | throwing money at things.) And many companies there still | pay for health insurance. I think this argument doesn't | really make sense: taxes or other costs of doing business | don't sufficiently explain the difference in pay. | teekert wrote: | The wealth gap is a lot bigger in the US and here you can | walk into a hospital even when you're homeless and leave | debt free. Anyone can apply for social security of about | 1000 eur/month. People are only homeless when they have | mental issues preventing them from following the steps to | get them out and they can get help at any point. This is | pretty different from the US. | dan-robertson wrote: | I don't disagree with what you wrote but I don't | understand what it has to do with differences in software | engineer salaries between the US and the Netherlands. | whazor wrote: | I have heard they pay in the higher end of Dutch | companies, which is still underwhelming especially | compared to FAANG. | [deleted] | mark_mart wrote: | Yes they pay pretty well. 13 salary, instead 12.(travel | bonus) | zoover2020 wrote: | Check Blind | mark_mart wrote: | I am a contractor who works for them, but have lots of | friends working as direct employee. (Netherlands, | software engineer mostly) | | They pay you 12+1 salaries (1=you get half of your salary | as bonus 2 times per year, as vacation bonus). | | You get 40 days of vacation (Netherlands has 25 days of | vacation standard, %99 of companies)so people are very | relaxed. | | ASML is able relocate you from another country, moving | all your house (I think it was up to EUR5.000 costs). | Bringing family etc. They show you around city, assign a | guide to explore city, help for municipality stuff etc. | | They also give a temporary (2months) accommodation until | you find a place, or until they move your house. | | They always hire because they are growing all the time. | | They have people working since 20 years or even 25 years. | | To me, frankly, it's like the Google of the Netherlands, | because some people try to get hired by them and retire | there. It's a good company in my experience. | Dma54rhs wrote: | They pay much better in USA where they also hire. SE | salaries are obviously a lot smaller in Europe, thinking | about FAAMG numbers is fairytales :) | saddlerustle wrote: | Optiver hires in Amsterdam with comparable compensation | to top US companies. | Avalaxy wrote: | Unrelated to this thread, but I always found 'optiver' | such a weird name for a Dutch company. Sounds to me like | "optiefer". "Optiefen" is a Dutch way of saying "fuck | off". | sabas123 wrote: | Optiver works in a vastly different and super tiny sector | (in employee count) which is renowned for having higher | salaries than any other sector (including tech) and is a | massive outlier. | teekert wrote: | I applied there, they asked me what I would do if there was | too much work for the week. Of course I answered I would just | work nights, np. No, they said: Go to your team lead tell | her/him you can do one thing and discuss what to choose. They | don't want people getting burned out, they are too important. | I liked that. | N1H1L wrote: | My major background is in electron microscopy. Eindhoven is | also a massively important microscopy center. This is because | Philips used to build great TEMs once upon a time, which was | spun out as Philips Electron Optics in the mid 90s. | | That company merged with FEI of Portland, OR to become one of | the largest electron microscope company. FEI a few years back | was bought out ThermoFisher to become a group company. They | still command a huge portion of the electron microscopy market. | orangepanda wrote: | Shame seeing Twitter going the way of pinterest. | | I'll assume the rest of the thread is just as informative. | c_hagau wrote: | Clearing the twitter.com cookie worked for me. | _Microft wrote: | Here it is: | https://nitter.net/trungtphan/status/1429464889307762688 | hobs wrote: | I genuinely dont understand this comment - twitter is already | pretty noisy - why would it "go in the way of pinterest"? | seedless-sensat wrote: | You need to login to show the whole thread. I hit the same | wall. Twitter was already a terrible medium for these kinds | of posts, now it just got worse. | hollerith wrote: | I didn't need to log in: I got the rest of the thread by | following the link "see rest of this thread". That link | though is easy to miss, what with being somewhere mid-page | and being surrounded by elements that are visually much | louder, and I, too, wish that no one here would submit or | upvote links to Twitter. | as1mov wrote: | Twitter seems to be doing some kind of A/B testing. | Clicking the "See rest of this thread", pops up a login | window, which on being closed takes you back to the | initial page. | COGlory wrote: | Yes, but we all know where this inevitably goes. See | Instagram, Reddit, Facebook, Pinterest, etc | hobs wrote: | Ah, thank you that makes more sense. | sbarre wrote: | Someone posted a third-party thread-unroll link elsewhere | in the discussion, I don't think that required a login? | hedberg10 wrote: | Twitter should not be an allowed source. | | Same with Pinterest in image search or Instagram. | nabakin wrote: | If you open the link you click in a new tab, you can get past | it. | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | Herein is described the most convenient manner to generate the | precise wavelength of light required to print on EUV photomask: | | - A molten tin droplet drops into a vacuum | | - It's pulsed by a high-power (25kW) laser | | - Tin atoms are ionized, creating plasma | | - A precision ground concave mirror captures EUV radiation | emitted by plasma | | - The Mirror transfers EUV to wafer (wavelength=13.5 nanometers, | basically X-ray level, through a series of reducing lenses...) | sharken wrote: | Seems like quite a risk to only have one company provide these | machines. | | Semiconductor companies seem to follow the same trend, the major | contributing factor seems to be the patent portfolio needed to | secure cross-licensing deals. | | It looks like patents are actively preventing new companies in | the semiconductor business. | hughrr wrote: | I think the extreme cost and risk to enter the business is the | key issue. | cadence- wrote: | Sounds like something governments could help with. | hughrr wrote: | Indeed. Only time that happened was in East Germany and it | didn't work out too good. | SkyMarshal wrote: | That wasn't the only time. | Bootvis wrote: | It's quite a bit more nuanced. I recommend reading some | work by Mariana Mazzucato to get some perspective. | | https://www.google.com/search?q=mariana%20mazzucato | cinntaile wrote: | Which book would you recommend? | SkyMarshal wrote: | Start with "The Value of Everything" [1], then "The | Entrepreneurial State". | | [1]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23890312 | Bootvis wrote: | I saw her present her book "The Entrepreneurial State" | and read it. It made me look at public and private R&D | investments in a new way. | hughrr wrote: | It's really not. The cost of production was too high | compared to other markets which reduced demand. Which is | exactly what happens with all government projects. | arp242 wrote: | There are a number of companies that can produce | lithography machines, just not on the same level as ASML | (at the moment anyway). Even if we ignore any patent/IP and | upfront investment issues, designing and actually | constructing machines which are on par with ASML's is not | an easy task and will take years of research, assuming the | project succeeds in the first place. What ASML is doing now | is the culmination of years of research and investment and | some pretty specific know-how. It's kind of like trying to | replicate NASA's James Webb telescope project: many of the | basic principles aren't very hard, but actually building | the thing is. | Sebb767 wrote: | That, and upfront investment costs. Very few companies have a | few spare billion to pour into setting up the infrastructure, | plus deal with resource deals, regulations, politics etc.. I'm | pretty sure that a lot of countries would prefer to be a bit | more independent on the semiconductor side, but getting up and | running is hard. | | > It looks like patents are actively preventing new companies | in the semiconductor business. | | As far as I know, the really deep technology on the CPUs is | actually not patented - it would be nearly impossible to | reverse engineer or proof an infringement, but you'd need to | reveal your methodology to file the patent in the first place. | jbverschoor wrote: | Yeah they have trade secrets. Patents are nice and all, but | good luck sueing in China. Even if you win, it'll be a one- | time fee | jbay808 wrote: | Canon and Nikon make similar machines too, but they've lost | market share ever since ASML released their dual scan system. | And at the moment EUV doesn't appear to be a mature enough | market to support competitors. | Someone wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_second_law: _"the cost | of a semiconductor chip fabrication plant doubles every four | years"_ | | I can't find it, but I've seen people extrapolate that to | compute when there would be room for only one fab in the world. | Seems we're there for one part of a fab. | jokoon wrote: | This law is really cancelled by Wirth's law | Beldin wrote: | Indeed. I've heard that there was a lead time of about 12 | years on the EUV machines at ASML. I had a tour of one off | their facilities once (generic recruitment thingy). Back in | early 2000s they were working to correct for errors where | _the margin of error on their error detector_ was greater | than the error that needed correcting. | | (The wave length used was about an order of magnitude greater | than the lirhography result; I have no recollection of how | they claimed to handle that.) | | They are pushing the boundaries of what's possible, using | incredibly long lead times. I don't see how any start-up can | compete with that, even in the absence of patents. | Throwawayaerlei wrote: | > The wave length used was about an order of magnitude | greater than the lirhography result; I have no recollection | of how they claimed to handle that. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_patterning and it's | pretty insane. | rdxm wrote: | heh. just now figuring this out? that's good... | rivo wrote: | A few highlights from a conversation with a friend who works for | Zeiss and regularly deals with ASML (take this with a grain of | salt, I may have misunderstood some of it and he also may not be | an expert in all of these areas): | | - The lenses (actually mirrors for EUV) only demagnify by a | factor of 4. So your wafer template is already extremely small | and costs millions to produce. | | - 13.5nm is pretty much the smallest wavelength you can | reasonably handle. If you want to go smaller, you have to build a | particle accelerator. (He heard that from a colleague, wasn't | sure how much of that was actually true.) | | - The prices in this Twitter thread are pretty spot on. The EU | wants to invest into chip making to become more independent in | this area. But the sums they're talking about wouldn't even pay | for one such machine. Politicians don't seem to be aware of the | dimensions we're talking about here. | | - Also in the thread, ASML has a monopoly on this tech. Others | have not invested into EUV and by now, it's pretty much | impossible for anybody to catch up. | | - Everyone's hiring like crazy atm. He started home office during | Covid and now Zeiss says he can't even go back to the office | because they don't have enough office space anymore. He doesn't | mind. Everyone's distributed all over the place anyway so whether | he does conference calls at the office or at home makes no | difference. | | - He said they're not very affected by the chip shortage. | BenoitP wrote: | > - He said they're not very affected by the chip shortage. | | You bet! TSMC/Intel/Samsung must give them for free; also give | them the first of each batch they make, as samples to be | analyzed. | natdempk wrote: | Mirror: | https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1429464889307762688.html | wombatmobile wrote: | How ASML Builds a $150 Million EUV Machine | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJIO7aRXUCg | sev wrote: | Do these machines not need semiconductors to function? | codeulike wrote: | First heard of ASML on here last year, in a comment where someone | described their EUV machine as the most complex machine ever | built, droplets of molten lead vaporized in a vacuum by | microscopically precise laser pulses, the resulting plasma beamed | by intricate mirrors onto miniscule wafers... | | Its fascinating how everyone relies on TSMC in South Korea, but | they rely on ASML in the Netherlands and no-one will catch up | with ASML for decades. Does that make ASML the most strategically | important company ever? Has there ever been any artifact so | important and scarce as their machines? | xxpor wrote: | I feel like ASML is the company that almost everyone who would | care has heard of at this point. Granted, I hadn't heard of them | 3 years ago, even though I work directly with HW designers. | | Its just funny how they're going through the hype cycle in their | level of public awareness. Give it 3 years and (hopefully) the | "general public" won't have to care about them again, because | chip shortages are resolved :) | ren_engineer wrote: | ASML will matter for decades unless a competitor surpasses | them. US is already blocking them from exporting to China | | https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-wants-a-chip-machine-from... | | the company is probably as important as TSMC in terms of | geopolitics now | analyst74 wrote: | > US is already blocking them from exporting to China | | This might actually be a good thing for China. In a | "necessity is the root of invention" kinda way. Ultimately | this might be good to the world too, competition is generally | a good thing. | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | This is true in general. In this case, however, there are | no efforts I am aware of in the industry that can catch | them. Their technological lead is so great, in so many | subsystem and science areas, it's likely they will be | defacto monopoly in this space for 20 years. | ren_engineer wrote: | China flat out bribing, kidnapping or blackmailing ASML | employees seems perfectly viable. Or sneaking operatives | into ASML to steal trade secrets. China is the best in | the world at this and they now have huge incentive to try | even harder | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | They will not be able to steal enough technology, nor | will they be able to manage the organization that | reproduces it. | analyst74 wrote: | I wouldn't consider higher wage for engineers and | scientists the same as bribing. I mean, one of silicone | valleys key strength is the ability for companies to | poach from competitors in order to catch up, this cross | pollination of ideas is both beneficial to the industry | AND individuals. | erichocean wrote: | > _US is already blocking them from exporting to China_ | | Which works until China invades Taiwan. Then what? | mixedCase wrote: | Aren't fabs already rigged with explosives in case of | invasion? | qorrect wrote: | Is this a real thing ? | Throwawayaerlei wrote: | Normal SOP is to keep the explosives, which do have | shelf-lives, in a magazine a short distance from where | they need to be emplaced. Perhaps look up how they Swiss | routinely included niches in bridges and the like to | place them in case of invasion. | cbozeman wrote: | "rigged with explosives" is likely a bit of an | exaggeration. | | It would not be difficult to conduct a campus-wide | evacuation then have the Taiwanese Air Force destroy the | facility with targeted weapons. It might also be the case | that the facility's precise coordinates are well-known to | Taiwanese military's artillery units and the entire place | could be reduced to rubble in minutes. | wonnage wrote: | blowing up the fabs definitely won't help with the supply | situation | Gys wrote: | The US (supposedly?) blocked ASML from exporting its | machines to China. ASML is a Dutch company. | ijidak wrote: | Ha. Tell that to all of Europe. | | Because so much trade is done in dollars. And because | companies globally want access to U.S. financial markets, | money transfer systems, companies and markets, the U.S. | has the ability to tell even foreign companies what to | do. | | That's why Europe was frustrated when Trump reinstated | sanctions on Iran. And had to try to figure out ways of | bypassing them. | (https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.voanews.com/middle- | east/voa...) | | The U.S. has incredible, unexpected power over global | companies and trade. | lokimedes wrote: | ASML may rely on ITAR / dual use parts they enables | export control by the US. Or, the US is simply applying a | diplomatic squeeze on the Netherlands. | Throwawayaerlei wrote: | Last time I checked the lasers come from California, from | a company that ASML ended up buying. | PabloRobles wrote: | Cymer (acquired by ASML) is the company providing the 13 | nm light sources for the EUV machines of ASML. | khuey wrote: | The original EUV research was done in US government labs. | another_story wrote: | Then what? Probably a fight that will result in one of the | greatest blows to the global economy ever, as well as the | collapse of China as we know it today. | | The Taiwanese will destroy all the fabs before China can | take them. We already have a chip shortage, can you imagine | what it will be like to cut current supplies by another | 40-50%? The resulting sanctions alone would cripple China. | | Hence, status quo will remain, and Taiwan will continue to | be a prop for nationalist speeches in China and the US | defense industry will continue to make a mint off selling | them old gear. | dan-robertson wrote: | If China invaded Taiwan then US companies would have a | hard time moving manufacturing outside of China so maybe | demand for semiconductors would go down. The problem | would just be the supply of everything downstream falling | off a cliff. | cbozeman wrote: | Then what? That isn't hard to figure out. | | If China invades Taiwan before enough TSMC plants are built | in America to meet American, and by extension - Western - | demand for electronics, then it's war. Period, end of | story. | | There is no fucking way in any timeline in any alternate | universe that Western electronics companies can allow China | to put their businesses on hold, because it isn't just a | bunch of AMD and Qualcomm CPUs... it's every automotive | company in the Western world. It's every appliance | manufacturer in the Western world _PLUS_ South Korea. | | China will go right back to 1820. Damn near dead fucking | last on the world stage. | | The Communist party leadership would probably kill Xi | Jinping before allowing him to make such a monumental | mistake. And nuclear war isn't an option either, because | all of China will end up completely uninhabitable if even a | single major American city gets targeted. | | And it won't just be "America vs. China" either, it'll be | "Every Western nation vs. China". And China will lose. | Badly. | mcv wrote: | Or it works until China develops their own. | philjohn wrote: | Seeing as you need ASML people to run these effectively, | maintain them, repair them - I'm guessing we will see a | massive global semiconductor shortage if China invades that | makes this year look like a cakewalk. | wrycoder wrote: | They can probably shut them off remotely. Also, some high | end CAM equipment is geofenced. They are only licensed | for one location. | eurasiantiger wrote: | As if a geolocation cannot be falsified :) | tomp wrote: | Can geolocation easily be falsified? Sure you can _jam_ | GPS, but can you easily _falsify_ it? | | I'm not an expert, but I was surprised to learn that GPS | chips aren't as simple as I imagined. E.g. to get a | "normal" (civilian I guess) licence you have to | manufacture your chips so that they shut down if the | object is moving too quickly (otherwise it could be used | for missiles). | ren_engineer wrote: | America pays the price for its short sighted hubris chasing | profits and thinking we could turn China into a liberal | democracy if we threw enough money at them | secondcoming wrote: | Tomahawk time for the fabs | Kye wrote: | All it takes is someone figuring out how to do the same thing | without all the specialized parts or bulk. That's the main | cost. This is the way of tech: it starts expensive, full of | specialized parts that only a few suppliers produce, then | someone figures out how to do it cheaper. | | At $1B a pop + 50% for lifetime maintenance, the incentive is | there. | lumost wrote: | The problem with semi is that they will move to a machine | that costs 2 billion a pop within 2 years. The output of | this 2 billion dollar machine will be greater than the cost | increase. | | Semi is heading to a winner take all market based on | capital expenditure. Even TSMC can't afford to in house the | work ASML does and keep pace with new developments. | xxpor wrote: | Thinking about it more, I don't think I'd even heard of TSMC | until 2014 or 2015. Not entirely sure. | bserge wrote: | Not only TSMC, a lot of companies were just "the cheap Asian | factories mass producing our stuff" a decade ago, and even 6 | years ago. | | Then they came out and said "you know what, we can do fine | without you", to western shocked Pikachu faces. | rapsey wrote: | So what does TSMC then do that no one else can replicate if they | use these machines? | woudsma wrote: | Apparently the machines are pretty hard to replicate, the | company (ASML) has had to deal with a couple of corporate | espionage cases in the past[0]. | | [0]: https://nos.nl/artikel/2280228-wat-heeft-de-chinese- | overheid... (in Dutch) | rapsey wrote: | What I meant was TSMC uses these machines. Anyone else | (except the Chinese I guess?) can also use these machines. | What is the TSMC secret sauce that no one else can match? | Keyframe wrote: | It's one (well, few) step of the process, albeit probably | the most important. | treme wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loiltpe6q-s&t=3s | | fantastic channel that goes in depth on chip industry | Stevvo wrote: | Think of these machines as being what a paint brush is to | an artist; it's just a tool. Anyone can buy a paintbrush, | but it takes much skill and experience to paint a | masterpiece. | | Even if you have a masterpiece in your possession to try | and copy, you will fail. | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | It's not a single thing, it's everything. State of the art | fabs require precision control of an incredible number of | process steps each with an incredible number of tunable | dimensions. These machines are just one piece of the | puzzle. A key piece, but buying the machines does not a fab | make. | wonnage wrote: | Semiconductor manufacturing seems to have a very big | winner-takes-all advantage, it takes enormous amounts of | capital and 3-5 years to start a new fab, and the | incumbents own a complicated web of secrets and patents | that are basically impossible to navigate. | tpmx wrote: | Peripheral knowledge (worked in Taiwan earlier): | | I suspect the following might be a big part of the secret | sauce: | | a) Having a culture where EE work is more prestigeous than | software work, leading to smart people going there. | | b) Having spent decades on scaling up the national university | system for engineering educations, starting from the 80s | electronics design/manufacturing boom. | | c) Having a low salary level, internationally speaking. | | The combination of a large, smart and affordable work force for | something like this is pretty hard to beat. | ren_engineer wrote: | just having a fancy computer doesn't make somebody a great | programmer | nabla9 wrote: | TSMC and Samsung are two companies that have competitive | technology node in EUV (Intel struggling). | | It means they have invented ways to use these machines to print | extremely small transistors and that are fast, energy efficient | and have good yield (less failures in the process). | bazooka_penguin wrote: | The lithography is just a step of the process. I'm just a | layman but there's a lot of chemistry involved in just the | processing of materials like coating and etching the wafers, | particle bombardment, etc. Even the conditions and environment | in which the lithography is done makes a big difference. | Fronzie wrote: | Calibration and following working procedures. The lithography | machines have endless knobs to tune. It has to be done well to | get a decent yield out of a factory. | rapsey wrote: | Seems a bit simplified... | s1291 wrote: | Fortunately, I have heard of ASML a few days ago thanks to this | video: https://youtu.be/hLwGtucsTms?t=1099 | cushychicken wrote: | ASML's first EUV machine contract closure was for $15 bil, and | the contract explicitly stipulated that $3bil was just for the | purpose of acquiring three specialty Boeing 747s for shipping the | machines to the clients. | | Each chunk of the machine must be shipped in vacuum. It takes | about 40 chunks to make a complete EUV lithography machine. Each | is about the equivalent mass of a school bus. | pas wrote: | Why the need for special 747s? Can't they put each chunk into a | shipping container sized steel box and seal it vacuum tight, | then ship that with regular 747s? | sroussey wrote: | Size issues. | | If I remember correctly, the machines are designed to fit the | plane and vis-a-versa. So they will be smaller on top to fit | the curvature of the plane body, for example | doikor wrote: | Splitting some of the parts into smaller parts will expose | the insides to outside air which brings some serious | cleanliness issues. The mirrors especially will get destroyed | instantly by heat if there is any dirt on them when they are | flashed by EUV. | sangnoir wrote: | I suspect their equipment is susceptible to vibrations on a | regular 747. I bet most of what makes their 747's special is | dampening. Also, packing and unpacking the equipment | increases the chance of things going wrong. | dataflow wrote: | Can someone explain why Intel needs TSMC to make their chips? Why | can't they just buy ASML's machines and use them to make their | own chips? | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | Fabs are just a wee bit more complicated than buy the machine | and plug it in. Everything is very tightly integrated under | insanely precise requirements. Changing equipment is akin to | redesigning and reconstructing a non trivial portion of the | fab. And that's just integrating these lithography machines, | which are but one piece of a huge puzzle. | dataflow wrote: | I don't think I suggested otherwise. But it's not like Intel | wouldn't have the capability of running ASML machines if it | wanted to, is it? | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | Yes. But it will take a non trivial amount of time for them | to change course, and they could still stumble on any | number of other issues on the integration. | superjan wrote: | IIRC They have bought some but they were hesitant to depend on | what was then unproven technology. Intel thought they could | achieve smaller chips using the previous generation's | technology. | jgab wrote: | One aspect is meeting the overlay and CD targets throughout the | stack to meet yield. Having a process that can find defects and | more importantly practices to minimize the defects in your | process is a big piece. Typically the process given to mass | production would be only half solved and then the fab is trying | to refine it in ramp. | | I used to manage a fab of high end ASML tools and there is a | non trivial list of things to continue and solve. You have | reliability issues that require scheduling long (2-5 weeks) | downtime to fix. | | An upstream defectively issue in a spinner tool might lead to | taking one dispense or develop node out of flow to improve the | defect rate but in turn tank the Scanner efficiency by 40% as | it waits to output wafers and that backs up the imaging. The | reality is the ASML tools given to fans don't have everything | ironed out at rhe start. So fabs see the reliability issues in | real time but there's no time for the fab to take it out of | production for 3 months to address a major part replacement. | These all lead managers to make bad choices that continue to | dig you in a hole. | | At the time I was supporting 14nm it was well known TSMC had | world class software tools and practices to minimize their fabs | defects and maximize higher order control of overlay and CD | bias. This allows them greater flexibility to take a tool down | and fix the issues rather than live with them or have to use a | band aid. | | EdiT: I did not work at intel so can only speculate why they | are behind but it was also well known TSMC photo engineers were | worked 80+ hrs/week always . They were paid less so they hired | more of them and they worked a lot longer so as a result they | had better fab processes and support tools. | dataflow wrote: | Thank you! | doikor wrote: | The lithography machines are just one part of a very complex | machine that is a semiconductor fabrication facility. So | basically they failed in one of the many other things. | moonbas3 wrote: | Intel already has a fab which makes it's own chips. They can | print, their problem is the design process on smaller nodes. | Throwawayaerlei wrote: | A bit on how this played out: what they call their first 10nm | node which in its third iteration has been named Intel 7 was | more aggressive than TSMC's first 7 nm node, and failed for | many years to economically produce chips. Both use 193 nm UV | lithography, and then TSMC made a more aggressive than | Intel's node using some EUV from ASML, and both TSMC nodes | worked. | | Now TSMC is two major nodes ahead with 3 nm risk production | credibly scheduled for this year and mass production next | year, with Intel said to be buying a _lot_ of that. What was | Intel 's still delayed 7 nm node, the first to use EUV, is | now named Intel 4. I've not looked at it closely, but it | looks like something equivalent to TSMC 3 nm nodes is | scheduled as Intel 20A for angstrom and 18A, sometime in 2024 | and 2025. | | I have yet to see anything that convinces me Intel will | regain its ability to make state of the art logic chips, | which for many generations was one of their most important | advantages, allowing them to beat "smarter" CPU designs with | their own CPUs being manufactured 1-2 nodes ahead of everyone | else. It will be interesting if some day the true story of | how this happened is revealed. | dataflow wrote: | I know they have had fabs, but they decided to go with TSMC | recently, and that's what I was wondering about. Going with | TSMC doesn't mean TSMC does their designs too, does it? | timwaagh wrote: | They weren't very fast at buying those machines. TSMC bought | more. | jgab wrote: | Incorrect ASML sold the first 15 to intel in 2015 | | https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asml-holding-orders- | idUSK... | sneak wrote: | Twitter won't show complete threads now without an account. :( | | Twitter accounts basically de facto require a phone number, or | they get suspended. | throwaway61223 wrote: | You can replace twitter.com w/nitter.eu to see things. | https://nitter.eu/trungtphan/status/1429464889307762688 | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | This isn't true at all. I just double checked and you can view | the thread logged out no problem. Twitter's UI is admittedly | garbo so depending when you clicked on the thread you may have | needed to click an expand link. | pritambaral wrote: | It's not consistent across loads, but I do get it some times. | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | It's intermittent. I've got the wall and then loaded it in | incognito. A/B testing? | bserge wrote: | Oh it's worse, it's location dependent. Developed countries | have more limited access, which is kinda ironic. | laurensr wrote: | You may have a more enjoyable reading experience using the | nitter frontend: | https://nitter.net/TrungTPhan/status/1429464889307762688#m | hiram112 wrote: | Yep, I feel bad for many of the less technical "rubes" who | still believe they're somewhat anonymous on the internet if | they, e.g. use Incognito (which Google went out of their way to | market as such), or buy some dubious VPN service, or use | disposable emails on Reddit, Twitter, etc. accounts. | | You are simply not anonymous on any site you visit or search | you make or place you go with your phone. The tech giants and | their "data sharing partners" can correlate you a dozen ways, | and most of that is by design via "features" like JS APIs and | browser data that is included in every request. | | Those of us paying attention know that Twitter, Reddit, Google, | FB, and the rest will turn over your real ID to law | enforcement, no questions asked. | | And it won't be long now 'till some conservative whistle blower | from Google or Twitter leaks the proof that the tech giants - | via the more politically inclined activists and operatives who | now work in their executive offices - have created blacklists | which are used to ensure no wrong-thinkers (e.g. Trump | supporters) are hired or employed at their own companies. And | then it will be leaked that these same blacklists were traded | and sold off to their "partners", and are being used for | similar purposes in all of corporate America. | | And from there, we know how this story ends, though I'm not | sure the activists enabling it understand that things won't | turn out well for them either. | shadilay wrote: | I think it's a matter of the data lords not yet playing their | hand. We know they have this data but they haven't used it | yet in any high profile case. They're just still in the | extend phase. | nick__m wrote: | It doesn't, sure you'll get suspended alright, but you can | appeal and get unlocked if you persistently tell that you don't | have a cellphone. | | Which in my case is true, and yes I know I sounds like that | guy: https://www.theonion.com/area-man-constantly-mentioning- | he-d... ;) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-08-22 23:01 UTC)