[HN Gopher] A bike parts company ditched Amazon to support indie... ___________________________________________________________________ A bike parts company ditched Amazon to support indie shops instead Author : nabilhat Score : 286 points Date : 2021-08-23 17:51 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.theverge.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theverge.com) | tomaszs wrote: | I was considering to use Amazon Fulfillment for Summon The JSON | decks. However, it occurred to be very expensive. My customers | are fine to wait a couple of days. They can also choose fast | manufacturing, to get decks faster. I don't fell I miss anything | by not selling or fulfilling by Amazon. | tacker2000 wrote: | This doenst surprise me at all. There are more and more sellers | that are frustrated with how amazon deals with them. | | Amazons top priority is the customer, and thats how they got to | this point, but everyone else suffers, from their 3rd party | sellers to their suppliers to their own employees. | | Here is a list of stuff Amazon does: | | -Anti competitive behaviour on the buy box (Amazon doesnt have | the product in stock. You have it, but your offer is still not | shown) | | -Banning sellers for no good reason, and you cant contact anyone | helpful | | -Screwing over their suppliers with Vendor Central, where they | buy from you wholesale. They dont pay, they just say the goods | were never delivered and dont accept your proof of delivery. I | know sellers who are owed over 30k from amazon. | | -Customers are able to send back items 1 year later. If you dont | agree, they can file an "AZ claim". If you get too manu claims, | they ban you. | | -Support for sellers is the worst combination of overseas call | centers using some cookie cutter templates to answer questions. | Often you are just copy pasting your question 5 times, until you | get somebody with have a brain | | -Use data from their sellers to create their own products and | then force them out of the market | | -creating huge incentives for chinese sellers which flood and | undercut the local sellers | | Its just a huge behemoth were nobody knows whats going on. | | In my opinion this company needs to be split up by gov and | reigned in. | | But who knows, maybe more sellers will follow suit and the | pressure will be increasing to change things. | analog31 wrote: | >>> -creating huge incentives for chinese sellers which flood | and undercut the local sellers | | In my view, another way of looking at it is that selling on | Amazon favors sellers who can figure out how to manage those | risks, and one way of doing it is to be basically a "fly by | night" business. If you can spin up multiple sellers, make your | nut on the first sale, and pull the plug on the seller if | anything goes wrong, you've got what it takes. | | Or, if your margins are high enough that you can afford to eat | the bad sales. | at-fates-hands wrote: | >> Banning sellers for no good reason, and you cant contact | anyone helpful. | | I must be getting old. | | How did these companies get so massive without any meaningful | customer service departments? Amazon, Google, Facebook and | many, many others where customer service is not even bothered | with, yet people continue to use their products and services. | blacktriangle wrote: | You do sound like my parents. They were mainframe programmers | in the 70s and still every time I complain about wierd issues | I'm having with programming, they'll keep asking me if I've | called tech support. | | They can't wrap their head around how you can have useful-ish | software with shitty incomplete out of date documentation and | tech support via people competing to get noticed on | StackOverflow for their resume. | | The more time goes on, I'm not sure I can wrap my head around | it either... | Johnny555 wrote: | _How did these companies get so massive without any | meaningful customer service departments? Amazon, Google, | Facebook and many, many others where customer service is not | even bothered with, yet people continue to use their products | and services._ | | As a customer, I've had no trouble reaching Amazon customer | service when I need help, and they've always been helpful - | refunding or replacing the defective product. | JohnFen wrote: | As a customer, I only needed customer service from them | once (in the over 10 years I've been buying from them). My | experience was truly terrible, and I ended up losing my | money. | theturtletalks wrote: | It's because they make it super easy for the customer, but | use dark patterns for the sellers. Amazon can afford to lose | sellers since more are popping up everyday and willing to | sell items for a loss to gain market share. | | The parent also didn't mention that Amazon has a policy of | not allowing sellers to sell their products for a lower price | on their own website. If only customers knew how much Amazon | is screwing over sellers, they would be wary. Many sellers I | know themselves don't shop on Amazon themselves due to this. | JohnFen wrote: | > Amazon has a policy of not allowing sellers to sell their | products for a lower price on their own website. | | This is why, when I decided to ditch Amazon, I also decided | to avoid buying from companies that sell on Amazon. | andromeduck wrote: | I'd buy from vendor sites if it weren't always such a pita | between checkouts, shipping and refunds. | bushbaba wrote: | As a customer why should I care about the seller | experience. As a customer I've only ever cared about the | customer buying experience | fossuser wrote: | Agreed - Amazon knows who their real customers are and | they have leverage over the sellers. | | It does surprise me though that given that there's a lot | of counterfeit junk and scam-like sellers on the site | (which is a pretty bad customer experience). You'd think | they'd shut that down. | | In practice it doesn't matter because prime shipping is | so much better than any non-amazon option I just deal | with that risk (with some exceptions where I'll buy | directly from the creator of the product). | thaumasiotes wrote: | > In practice it doesn't matter because prime shipping is | so much better than any non-amazon option I just deal | with that risk | | Really? I'm strongly considering canceling my prime | subscription specifically because shipping has gotten so | awful. Amazon won't even _allow_ you to select a shipping | speed anymore. Pretty much everywhere else on the | internet is better. | fossuser wrote: | My recent experience with non-amazon shipping: | | - Ordered a blanket directly from the blanket maker's | website, order details were delayed, no shipping notice, | no out of stock notice, order took 4 months to arrive (it | was supposed to be a gift). | | - Ordered some flatware from MOMA was charged and no | shipping details updated, I waited six weeks before | emailing them - they said the system 'lost the order' I | had to have paypal reverse the charges. | | There are other examples, but generally non-amazon sucks | - even in the best of cases it's twice as long and | usually expensive. | | With Amazon I often get two day, next day, or even same | day shipping for free. Packages arrive typically well | packaged and undamaged and the tracking is really good. | If there are any issues they are quick to resolve it. | JohnFen wrote: | None of that is like my most recent interactions with | Amazon. | thaumasiotes wrote: | > Packages arrive typically well packaged and undamaged | | That's another thing. Amazon used to ship things in boxes | with appropriate padding. Now they're shipping books in | manila envelopes, with predictable damage to the book | from the tightness of the envelope. | fossuser wrote: | I wonder if there's regional variation depending on | warehouses? I'm in SF and have had pretty good | experiences. | | It's mostly a comparison I'm making to alternatives which | I've found to be worse (usually the non-amazon packaging | is terrible). | JohnFen wrote: | > prime shipping is so much better than any non-amazon | option | | This isn't as true as it used to be, and it's getting | less true as time goes on. | pengaru wrote: | Short-term convenience wins every time. | kelvin0 wrote: | The retail customers who end up buying the stuff are lavishly | treated. The small businesses which sell their products on | Amazon are not really 'customers' and are treated like 5th | class citizens. Proof and burden rests on these suppliers | shoulders. | ozzythecat wrote: | >In my opinion this company needs to be split up by gov and | reigned in. | | I think there are a lot of things Amazon can do better, but | your solution is interesting. | | "I am not happy with Amazon. The company should be broken up by | the government." | | If everything you stated is absolutely true and systemic | issues, IMO let the market and consumers punish Amazon. | | It sounds like you're saying Amazon is good enough that it's | impossible to take away their customer base. On the other hand, | you're describing what seems to be a completely broken company | not worth a minute of my time. | | Which is it? | Qi_ wrote: | Another one: inventory pooling. When a product is "fulfilled by | Amazon," it comes from warehouse stock. However this stock can | be contributed to by all sorts of sellers, legit or | counterfeit. So sometimes buyers will receive a knockoff when | they purchased a legitimate product. I have a relative who | designs and sells electronics accessories, and he said this is | a serious problem he runs into when selling on Amazon. | bisby wrote: | This is one of the things they do that could be spun as "pro | seller". As a consumer, I don't like buying from vendors that | I can't verify how much I trust them. So "fulfilled by | Amazon" convinces consumers to buy with confidence, and even | a no-name seller can get sales without having to compete on | reputation. This means that consumers actually can't trust | where they are buying from. | | I very much don't like this as a consumer. | Johnny555 wrote: | It's also pro-consumer since it means that you get your | order faster. Instead of sending you the widget that was | warehoused across the country by your seller, they can sell | you the one that was warehoused near your house by a | different seller. | | (in theory they could always just ship it across the | country, but then they'll have to raise shipping prices) | | Mingling counterfeit products with genuine products is a | problem, but since I rarely know Amazon merchants, I'm not | sure that's considerably worse than not mingling at all, I | could just as likely try to buy from a merchant that's | selling counterfeits. | amznthrwaway wrote: | Inventory commingling is a choice that can be made by the | seller. | withinrafael wrote: | Sellers can opt in/out of the inventory commingling you | describe. But perhaps there are restrictions/conditions that | make this harder than it sounds. | freeopinion wrote: | > Amazons top priority is the customer | | This is not and should not be true. If it were true, Amazon | would operate completely differently. It should be more true | than it is. | munk-a wrote: | For at least one specific example - Amazon does an extremely | poor job vetting products posted on its site which causes a | lot of defective items to end up getting piped through it to | consumers. Prioritizing your customer over everything else | means delivering a high quality consistent product - which it | fails to do with regular listings and fails spectacularly to | do with Amazon Basics. | dangus wrote: | IMO you're misunderstanding the customer. | | The customer wants cheap. They WANT Amazon to be AliExpress | with fast shipping. | | That's why Amazon has free returns and they offer returns | in a million different ways. | | Amazon doesn't care that it's inefficient on resources and | that these items end up in a landfill. The manufacturing | cost of cheap items is so low that it's no big deal. As | long as the customer has no friction in buying or returning | they are happy. | | I think there are certain categories of products where many | customers would actually prefer counterfeit items as long | as the quality is acceptable. Just walk down a cereal | aisle. | munk-a wrote: | IMO you're misunderstanding _this_ customer. The returns | are pretty friction-less but they 're still a burden that | I'd rather not deal with - and I specifically don't want | to order an electrical device off amazon and have it fail | in a spectacular way that damages my other equipment. | | The most luxurious thing you can tell me as a seller is | that you're minimizing the longest potential time until I | have a correctly functioning product - shipping is a big | part of that, but not having to go through the hassle of | getting it shipped out twice and returning one of them is | another component. | | Also I think AliExpress is a pretty terrible comparison - | Amazon does beat it hand over fist. I think Amazon wants | to be NewEgg but with less shipping time (and maybe the | reputation it had a decade ago - it seems to be | struggling lately). And it wants to be every other | specialist store as well. I _think_ it 's possible for | them to do this, but the thing they're lacking right now | is the budget or motivation to actually vet products - | they rely on peer reviews and manufacturer statements to | try and suggest products. | ilamont wrote: | _Amazon follows a core set of Leadership Principles (LPs) | that we Amazonians aspire to every day. They are ingrained in | our culture, and they guide the behaviors we value. It's very | telling that the first LP is Customer Obsession--leaders | start with the customer and work backwards. They work | vigorously to earn and keep customer trust. Although leaders | pay attention to competitors, they obsess over customers._ | | https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/industries/an-inside-look-at- | th... | jorblumesea wrote: | haaaaah | | Anyone who knows Amazon knows there's tons of politics and | leeway in those LPs, and they get twisted for nefarious | purposes. | ruddct wrote: | Would love to hear how a catalog riddled with counterfeits, | fake reviews and listing-hijacking is a Customer Obsession. | | Not trolling, Ex-Amazon so I'm curious how current | Amazonians rationalize these things. | Spivak wrote: | Because you're focusing on small but visible details that | are hard unsolved problems for a company that's Amazon's | size. | | If you have the solution to any of these problems you | would have a genuinely game-changing business and would | be a 100M company selling it to every online marketplace. | freeopinion wrote: | There you go. You just prioritized size over solving | those problems. It is more important to be big than to | get it right. | travoc wrote: | These are not small details to be dismissed flippantly. | Counterfeits and tainted listings are dangerous, | especially considering how many health-related products | are sold on Amazon. | bityard wrote: | You're taking this to mean something different than the | parent intended. The intended meaning is more along the lines | of the old trope, "the customer is always right." This means | that in any dispute between the seller and the buyer, Amazon | favors the buyer 99% of the time. To the point that it's | incredibly easy (and common) to be a hobbyist Amazon scammer | as long as you stick to scamming marketplace sellers instead | of Amazon itself. | TonyTrapp wrote: | It's so interesting to see how the pandemic hits different | countries in different ways. This article talks about struggling | bike shops. The truth couldn't be any more different in Germany. | Bike shops were run over by customers because so many more people | wanted to either go to work by bike instead of public | transportation, or they had no work to do so they decided to go | biking in their new spare time. Repair shops are super busy, but | now there's a shortage in bike parts, too... | analog31 wrote: | There was a huge run on bikes in the US. I think a number of | factors were involved. Because cycling in the US is mostly | recreational, the bike business is seasonal, and retailers lay | in their entire years stock for delivery in the springtime. If | there's a big change in demand, it can take them a year to | react. | | Then those bikes didn't show up because of shipping delays. | | Then there was a big spike in demand, as people realized a | couple of things: 1) Cycling is an outdoor activity that seems | like it carries a minimal COVID risk. 2) It's a way of getting | to work if you're still working but public transit is shut | down. These things, together, ramped up demand for both cheap | and expensive bikes simultaneously. | | Shops ran out of bikes, and then it became very hard to stay in | business, even if there was still demand for repairs and parts. | | Bike parts have always been a problem in the US. There's too | much variety for any shop to be able to maintain a decent | stock, so a lot of things have to be ordered. In my own case, | since I ride older bikes, it's highly tempting to order stuff | from Amazon or even (preferably) eBay because of the selection. | Some stuff, such as Sturmey Archer hub parts, have to be | sourced from overseas. | mikepurvis wrote: | I'm surprised about the inventory thing. I ride an 03 | Cannondale road bike that uses all standard stuff-- screw-in | bottom bracket, band-on front derailleur, 9-speed shifters. | I've always been able to get parts for it off the shelf at | multiple shops, to the point that basically nothing on it is | original other than the frame. | | But this has even been the case with my much-weirder winter | bike, my kids' bikes that have off-brand shifters, etc. | | I know Sheldon Brown (RIP) catalogues a true nightmare | history of incompatibilities that have built up over the | years, but I think in reality, most of that stuff is | pre-1990. If you have a non-imported bike purchased in the | last three decades, it's going to either be Shimano or be | knockoff parts that are Shimano-compatible. | zwieback wrote: | I think that's basically the same situation here in the US, | bike shops are super busy but the supply chain can't keep up. I | also have to say that most bike shops I've visited aren't that | good. They seem to have an over-supply of awkward young sales | staff giving middling advice while facing an undersupply of | bikes and parts. Also, the constant churn in componentry is not | helping. | jetrink wrote: | It sounds like the bike shops were struggling due to low | inventory, not low demand. Anecdotally, that was the case at | the bike shops near me in Chicago, which had empty shelves, but | also months-long wait lists for their tuneup and repair | services. Unfortunately, bike sales are a large part of their | revenue. | jwagenet wrote: | > By the start of 2021, Kerson heard of bike shops on the brink | of closing down due to such high demand and low inventory. | | It sounds like shops should have done well, but we're subject | to shortages which lead to purchases at online retailers | instead. | alistairSH wrote: | Demand was high in 2020, but bike shops (in the US) generally | have poor cash flow overall. Dealers were able to clear their | inventory, but there was no supply to replenish it, leaving | them with empty showrooms. Even today, inventory is spotty and | the wait for certain models of bikes is well into 2022. | yardie wrote: | Bike shops in the US have been struggling since the beginning | of the pandemic. Some got a slight bump with increased sales. | And riders that couldn't buy new brought in old bikes for | repair. Eventually, supply chain issues surfaced and you can't | sell what you can't buy. | JohnFen wrote: | I love this trend. I stopped using Amazon last year, and I'm very | interested in doing business with companies who chose likewise. | Kaibeezy wrote: | It's a start. | | See also "Parallel Polis": | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_Polis | | And, Havel's _The Power of the Powerless_ : | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_the_Powerless | a-dub wrote: | amusingly there's nothing particularly new here in terms of the | alternatives they're exploring. i used to work in a local bike | shop and thought about even doing bike parts e-commerce in the | 90s. bicycles and parts have always been a high touch business. | manufacturers treat local bike shops like customers, assign reps | who visit to ensure merchandising standards and have strict rules | regarding pricing to ensure all the shops can survive. | | it amuses me to read that they're setting that up now as if it's | new, as it is how it used to work for a very long time. | [deleted] | mariushn wrote: | Related trivia: Jeff Bezos's father was a local bike shop owner: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LP80jo1_UgU | greenie_beans wrote: | wow! the irony is rich. i wonder how amazon impacted his small | business? | dkhenry wrote: | I am happy the parts company is ditching Amazon, but its so much | more important for us consumers to ditch amazon. I have cut my | amazon purchases down to only 16 total items this year so far ( | down from ~50 in 2020 ) and I am now only ordering from Amazon as | a last option when I cant find what I want anywhere else. That | brief glimpse of the Amazon future where all stores are shut | down, and we can only ever buy things online, and everyone is an | amazon serf was such a wakeup call as to what we were heading | towards. I just hope enough people can jump ship to keep a | functioning non amazon centric supply chain. | Rapzid wrote: | I like Amazon and online shopping; won't ditch any time soon | and don't think it's important for people to do so. | | The local businesses I was worried about going under were | restaurants and others in the food/service industry(would lump | experience in there as well; the zoo, botanical garden, | museums, and etc). | jungturk wrote: | > don't think it's important for people to do so | | Is that because you don't believe in the negative | externalities or because you think they're worth the | convenience? | dkhenry wrote: | And I believe its exploitive of everyone in the supply chain, | from manufacturers to delivery drivers, and has led to the | vast centralization of an overwhelmingly large portion of our | economy into the hands of corporation with no accountability. | | Furthermore I am very convinced it makes the lives of | everyone, except the tiny minority that are actively | exploiting everyone else, much worse. Good jobs are lost, | supply chains are made fragile, and monopolistic tendencies | are encouraged. I would rather the inconvenience of shopping | around than encourage a world with a private entity as the | sole source of all consumer goods. | cortesoft wrote: | Yeah, but we are never going to stop that behavior by | individuals choosing not to shop at Amazon. As an | individual, my only two choices are to shop at Amazon and | get the benefits and Amazon still exists, or don't shop | there and don't get the benefits and Amazon still exists. | Amazon is not going to care if they lose my business. The | only person who suffers is me. | | If we think Amazon business practices are immoral, we need | to make them illegal. | quadrifoliate wrote: | > I am happy the parts company is ditching Amazon, but its so | much more important for us consumers to ditch amazon. | | Conversely, maybe it's important for both big and small | businesses to realize that investing in your online presence | and building out a high-quality local delivery network is | _much_ more important than the high-rent place on Main Street? | | A lot of the reasons I buy on Amazon are that it offers a much | more _pleasant_ experience. In fact, if you go to the | manufacturers ' sites for a lot of the products Amazon sells, | they have a slow checkout process, scammy discount codes and | email signup incentives, and generally optimize for consumer | lock-in rather than getting the product to the consumer | quickly. Imagine Google if it had popped up a discount code for | "Get 200 searches at 15% off!" every time you searched for | something, and think of how successful they would be if they | did that. | | As for a lot of small-time local shops I know, they seem to | place an unduly high value on prime real estate, and their | websites are at the level of "My nephew says he knows | Dreamweaver". | | In summary, I am not super surprised they are being beaten out | by Amazon, and it is unclear to me as to why _I_ should | subsidize their bad web design and reluctance to invest in | building a consumer-friendly online experience. | iso1210 wrote: | In the UK we had shops that sold everything -- Argos has done | catalogue shopping for decades. Sainsburys, a major | supermarket, owns them, and does delivery. | | Amazon makes it trivial to buy pretty much anything I want and | get it the next day. Sainsburys sells the same stuff between | themselves and argos, yet they failed miserably at competing. | They could have worked with companies like royal mail and | leverage their logistics expertise to compete, but they failed | miserably to even realise why I shop at amazon. | | I'm not some 1970s afficiando going out to a high street to buy | something in person, it's very unlikely I _need_ something | right then and can 't wait for 24 hours for someone to bring it | to me. I have better things to do with my time. | dkhenry wrote: | It's not the mega conglomerates they are putting out of | business. It's the bike stores, the hobby shops, the clothing | boutiques. In the US with the purchase of Whole Foods, they | are also moving more into groceries and everything else. | After experiencing not being able at all to go to a high | street and buy things and forcing everything to be online, I | realized just how bad the experience is, and decided if I had | to choose between the two I would choose the physical | experience. | | Once you do that you start to realize just how much of the | consumer goods world Amazon has already put out of business. | I live in silicon valley and there is no where I can go for | electronics any more. My last amazon purchase was getting | some 2.5A fuses because every store that would sell them | locally has closed ( either before the pandemic, or because | of it ). I tried to buy a video card, and the local computer | equipment retailer literally couldn't get allocated any stock | from the manufacturers, somehow Amazon managed to get first | dibs on supply. I don't like that world, and I don't want to | live in it. | sefrost wrote: | I was at Argos between 2012 and 2013. Fresh out of | university. At one point during my time there, for around | five or six weeks, me and another graduate were the only | front end developers on the entire Argos website. At that | stage I don't think I knew the difference between margin and | padding in CSS just to give you an idea of our level. | | It was truly chaotic. The amount of money they wasted on | Accenture consultants should be criminal. I know it's a | cliche to say money is wasted on consultants, but really, no | work happened. A lot of energy was expended but nothing was | built or created. | | I was in a newly formed "innovation hub" which had a lot of | very talented people but we were blocked from doing anything | by internal and external staff at every turn. | | One time we tried to have a QA environment set up so that we | could demo and test our work. We were told it would take _9 | months_ to provision a server for us. We were a team of about | 20 in expensive central London office space and we didn't | have an environment to test our work. It took about 8 hours | to do a deploy to production, so if something was broken the | BEST CASE scenario was it would take 8 hours to fix. I never | saw the best case scenario. | | The most talented and motivated staff in the innovation hub | slowly left after we were told that the pace of change had to | be "glacial". | | Argos never stood a chance of competing against Amazon. | hprotagonist wrote: | Good. PNW bikes (and treefort and some others) do good stuff. | | At this point selling on amazon makes me trust you less -- i've | gotten way too many fake parts accidentally over the years to | trust them with. | jrd259 wrote: | > After leaving his job in global business development at Amazon, | Aaron Kerson used his knowledge of the platform's sales | algorithms to power up his new business. | | Don't corporations typically have non-compete clauses to prevent | an employee from exploiting proprietary knowledge they gained | while working for the firm? Would we be supportive of someone who | left (e.g.) a small bicycle parts company to help Amazon rule | that market? | tkahnoski wrote: | Yes... (not a lawyer so grain of salt here) There are three | basic tools for IP protection: | | 1) Copyright - protects outright copying of an IP asset 2) | Patent - protects against the reimplementation of the same IP | 3) Trade Secret - Similar to patent, but enforcement is | trickier especially for software as you have to demonstrate a | benefit to it being secret as well as your efforts to keep it | secret. | | Non-competes are more of a blunt instrument and a controversial | topic. Amazon is infamous for having them. Typically only hear | of companies trying to enforce these at executive level as any | enforcement at a lower level can impact recruiting heavily. | OliverJones wrote: | In the bike-parts and other speciality manufacturing | businesses, there's a fourth barrier to entry for new | competitors: reputation for quality. | | Quality matters a whole lot for the kind of products PNW | makes. Not every cyclist has the ability to figure out | whether a part was manufactured correctly (no cracks or voids | in castings, etc etc). | | Maybe they outsource them. But finding contract manufacturers | who do a good job is a highly skilled business. | | And cyclists depend on stuff like this to work. I once had | the top of a cheapo seatpost break off on a road bike, in the | late fall, far from home. Cheezy metal manufacturing. Cold | couple of hours waiting for a rescue. Happily I didn't crash. | | I learned my lesson. Now I buy stuff from my local bike shop, | or sometimes REI if I'm far from home. The possibility of | counterfeit parts is frightening. I know I can trust the | local bike shop to source decent parts. | fossuser wrote: | In California non-competes are [edit: unenforceable] (it's | arguably one of the reasons for Silicon Valley's success). | | It varies by state though, so not sure about Washington and | elsewhere. | matmatmatmat wrote: | Nit: They are unenforcable, but not illegal in themselves: | https://www.callahan-law.com/are-non-competes-enforceable- | in... | fossuser wrote: | Yep - you're right, edited and fixed. | InitialLastName wrote: | When he started the company in 2015, presumably he wasn't | competing with Amazon (by selling products on their platform | that they don't have their own brand of). By now, I'd assume | any non-compete that might cover "don't sell products that | compete with us" have expired. | samstave wrote: | I've biked THOUSANDS of miles in the last years - growing up in | Tahoe biking all through the 80s... Heck this month alone I have | biked nearly 500 miles (26 miles a day, 29" mtn.... | | Anyway, Have you dealt with a lot of "local bike shops" -- I have | dealt with too many to count. | | Lets look at a few pros and cons of "local bike shops": | | Pro: | | -- Support a local business | | -- Go in and talk to an actual person? (maybe) | | Cons: | | -- Many gear-head bike shop employees (specifically the | mechanics) have a BOFH attitude, are gruff, rarely have time to | talk - generally have an attitude. | | -- Many of the local shops are now pushing bikes that are fucking | $10,000 -- I looked at a bike in Mikes Bikes just last week - and | it was $15,000 | | -- Gear selection is limited to a couple brands, and prices are | no better than amazon | | -- Bike shops aren't like starbucks - they are fucking far apart. | | -- I have biked DAILY for over a decade. I have gotten HUNDREDS | of flats - and I always carry 2 tubes with me (yes, I want to go | tubeless, just havent done so yet) - getting tubes off amazon is | ideal. Having to have to drive very far to go buy a tube is a | non-starter | | Local bike shops currently have shitty inventories because of the | supply shortage from china - and to have to again drive to the | bike shop to find out that their inventory is low, that the | lowest end bike is $5,000 and they want to sell every garment for | >$50 with stupid logos and printing all over them to show that | you, the customer-turned-billboard are "serious about your | biking" | | -- Having to stand near too many weekend-road-warriors who really | don't need anything but want to instead show you how much money | they threw into their entire kit.... | | -- Having to deal with upsell in certain cases | | -- Having to get blank stares with questions about anything | outside of what the store actually sells and too many answers of | "gee, I don't know" | | --- | | Yeah, While I hate Amazon's monopoly as much as everyone -- this | does NOT make all local bike shops even. | | Yes, I have met some awesome ones - not not enough to where every | bike shop nearest me is a good one in every single city I have | loved in all over the greater bay area all the way up to Tahoe | City... | philistine wrote: | This is fascinating and a great description to the threats facing | Amazon. When you cede responsibility to Amazon that your business | requires to perform adequately (in this case it seems to be the | ability to match a bike to its compatible parts) than that is a | risk for Amazon to lose its place as the internet's mall if it | cannot offer a way to stay relevant. If zero bike parts are | available on Amazon today it might become bigger and bigger | markets tomorrow, that a company like Shopify is better aligned | to serve. | scoofy wrote: | If I recall correctly, Specialized Bikes pulled all their | products from Amazon a while ago, pointing to the failing local | bike shops eventually hurting the bike business for everyone. | | Bicycles are not toys. They are vehicles that need maintenance. | You can do much of that maintenance yourself if you're a nerd, | but the vast majority of cyclists are dependent on local bike | shops to sustain the cycling community. | | The bicycle/parts manufacturers need a large cycling community to | sell products to. The large cycling community will have novice | and intermediate cyclists that will abandon cycling if their | bikes break down. The novice and intermediate cyclist need local | bike shops to do maintenance on their bikes at affordable rates. | The local bike shops need a revenue stream beyond labor for | maintenance to be affordable. Thus, the major bicycle | manufacturers need to give a oligopoly status to the local bike | shops in order to keep their user base large. | | As a life long cyclist, I've seen the industry grow and wane, and | throughout it all, I've seen the vast majority of people think | bicycles are some type of sports-equipment. Decisions like this | are one of only a few business models that I can see sustaining | the community. I'm actually surprised and optimistic to see the | major manufacturer Trek start building their own brick and mortar | shops in certain major cities, though I'd prefer to see this | happen through a major cooperative between the various brands. If | you care about making cycling a serious, sustainable transit | alternative, we need to maintain the entire ecosystem of | ridership, which means the race to the bottom on amazon must be | stopped. | williamtwild wrote: | "Bicycles are not toys. " | | Yes and no. I think what most people think of when they think | bicycle is the throw away kind that you buy at you local big | box retailer or sporting goods store. These are toys in the | sense the they were likely meant for casual recreation and at | most might get a tire patched or some other simple repair. | mikepurvis wrote: | My kids all ride former-toy bicycles that I've had for a song | from FB Marketplace and nursed back to health. | | But yeah, I think the GP is speaking aspirationally. We need | to _get to a place where_ bikes are considered infrastructure | the way a vehicle is, that everyone has one, and has a | selection of shops around them to service it, same as | everyone currently has lots of garages, dealers, and gas | stations around to meet the needs of their automobile. | sokoloff wrote: | If bikes get to that point, that means buying parts online | to me. Making it hard to get parts is not generally | supportive of cycling IMO. | | I buy almost all of my parts to service our cars online. | Amazon, RockAuto, and brand-specific parts suppliers | (PeachParts, HandA/Bernardi, Ricambi, etc.) I can recall | going to a physical dealer 3 times in the last 20 years and | each time it was for a "I need it exactly this afternoon | and I'm willing to pay for it in dollars and | inconvenience". | dublinben wrote: | The point is that if you're performing your own service | of your car, you're already more of an enthusiast than | your bicycling counterpart. Cycling for transportation | needs to work for the mainstream, buy it from a dealer on | installment, take it to the shop for routine maintenance, | treat it as an appliance consumer. Enthusiasts will | always find a way in spite of bad infrastructure. | southerntofu wrote: | Maybe to you it's a more convenient experience, but not | everyone has the same approach to shopping. Some are | happy to receive advice for specific products (or to have | someone tell them what quality level they're going for), | while others are simply happy to be able to have a human | interaction at the counter (i'm in both categories). | | Moreover, i'm not convinced online shopping is better for | society at large. From an ecological perspective, from an | anti-monopoly perspective.. | bradlys wrote: | Ecological perspective, it's better than having a single | person driving a significant distance to a specific | destination. (On top of the maintenance of that | destination) Whereas - delivery wise... you're like a few | hundred extra feet of driving maybe. (Assuming you live | in a city/decently-sized suburb) | | Packaging is the only issue that needs to be solved more | efficiently but there are potential solutions to that. | r00fus wrote: | Not everyone is capable of handling the labor portion of | the (labor + parts) equation of servicing a bike (not to | mention a fleet of bikes for family). | | I certainly can only handle the basics and the family | rides a decent amount of miles/wk. | | I buy local - many times it's even cheaper than Amazon - | and I live in an expensive metro. | sokoloff wrote: | Presumably the people who can't (or won't) do the labor | are _already_ buying parts from their shop though, right? | | I doubt many people are buying parts on Amazon (or | previously from Nashbar) and asking a bike shop to | install them. | Swenrekcah wrote: | I think the point is to enlarge the community. More local | bike shops and services will lead to more riders, firstly | because they'll notice it as an option whereas many | wouldn't have before and secondly because the more there | are the closer they'll be to anyone's home or workplace, | thus more convenient. | Rapzid wrote: | I think of my road bike and the mountain bikes I owned when I | did that.. So toys(sports equipment). | | But yeah, the majority of the US population probably thinks | recreational bikes for their kids and maybe the ones they own | to ride with their kids.. Also toys. | rapind wrote: | > I'm actually surprised and optimistic to see the major | manufacturer Trek start building their own brick and mortar | shops in certain major cities | | I wouldn't be too optimistic. We have one in Toronto. When I | brought in my trek that I bought from them to fix it, it cost a | fortune and they didn't actually fix it properly. | | Similar to servicing your car at the dealer. It's super | expensive. Difference being the quality of work is questionable | (no doubt varies quite a bit). | | Lesson: learn to fix your own bike or settle for crappy big box | bikes instead. | JCharante wrote: | Non-chain shops might be better. I'm learning to service my | own bike because the cost of labor and overhead is really | high in the US compared to where I got hooked on road cycling | (Vietnam). | secondcoming wrote: | I have a lot of tools that I got so I could service my bike. | Now, the industry has moved on with various sizing standards | and these tools will be useless when I get a new bike. | scoofy wrote: | I would actually write to trek about that. The shop here in | SF seems pretty solid, but I don't currently have a Trek | bike, so I might be wrong. I agree with you on the analogy, | but I'm pushing for the apple-store parallel. No serious | computer nerd would use an apple-store as a serious place to | maintenance their laptop, but novice to intermediate computer | users would, even if they have to go back a few times. | sonthonax wrote: | > You can do much of that maintenance yourself if you're a nerd | | I'm finding this to less true these days. As bikes become more | 'integrated' with components specific to the model they're | becoming harder to fix. It's particularly bad with aero bikes | that have aero handlebars, weird stems and internal routing. | | Even if you're a bike nerd, what you know won't really apply on | another bike anymore. | hinkley wrote: | Even if you can do routine maintenance - and I can't recommend | learning basic maintenance highly enough - sooner or later your | bike will get damaged by a wreck, falling over, getting backed | into, or ending up in way too much water for too long. You want | a pro who can tell you fix or replace. | | And you don't want to deal with counterfeit items either. | cactus2093 wrote: | I think you're reading too much into this. Specialized stopped | selling bikes on Amazon for the same reason Apple (as well as | other high profile brands mentioned in the article like Nike, | etc.) doesn't use Amazon as the primary retailer of their | products - because it's an unnecessary middleman. Specialized | is enough of a big, premium brand name that they can drive | people to their own online shop directly. Online/DTC sales is | inevitable in the bicycle industry, just like it has been for | most other consumer products in the past decade, and prior to | the pandemic Specialized had made a huge push into online sales | to compete with the likes of Canyon (which was a bike company | founded to take advantage of exactly this market gap which for | whatever reasons the traditional brands were slow to get into). | | The online model is also amazing for consumers as well (not to | mention small indie bike manufacturers). Instead of choosing | between maybe 2-5 bikes that might match my basic preferences | and be in stock at my local bike shop, I have dozens if not | hundreds of models to choose from made by any manufacturer | around the world. | | Sure, shops that do bike maintenance are important, but none of | what you're saying here explains why any special interventions | are needed for them. Won't the demand of more people using | bicycles, and needing them fixed, be enough to keep these | maintenance businesses healthy? I think the industry as a whole | is much better off focusing on getting bikes to more people, | and then improving cycling infrastructure to make it safer and | more accessible to average people in everyday situations. The | number of bike mechanics available is certainly not a major | bottleneck that is keeping anybody from taking up cycling | today. | _Wintermute wrote: | Funny that Specialized are worried about local bike shops given | their track record. Want to stock Specialized bikes? They'll | try and strong-arm you to dedicate the majority of your floor- | space to selling other Specialized components, removing options | for the existing customers of the shop. | | Named your small bike shop after a famous bicycle race and | French town (roubaix)? Specialized will try and sue you because | they have a model of bike with the same name (and don't even | own the trademark). https://capovelo.com/Specialized- | Threatening-to-Sue-Bike-Sho... | scoofy wrote: | I mean, the idea that Specialized isn't moving toward the | apple store-style model that Trek seems to be moving toward | is honestly an act of good will. Dumb lawsuits aside, | specialized is one of the best brands out there, and they | absolutely have the power to ask for concessions. They're | running a business selling absurdly high-end bikes. They're | not bikesdirect selling baseline products. | _Wintermute wrote: | Specialized have had their own "concept stores" for years | now, Trek are merely copying that idea. | | As someone who has worked in multiple bike shops, and also | broken their own Specialized bike and had to deal with | their warranty department, I'm never giving them any of my | money again. | scoofy wrote: | Huh... so it seems. It appears that they only really | exist in the UK, which is odd seeing as Specialized is | based in the Bay Area. I see there are two locations in | the Los Angeles area. | klyrs wrote: | Try to steal a sandwich from a squirrel. It isn't going to | bite you out of concern for how you'll treat the sandwich... | namdnay wrote: | > The novice and intermediate cyclist need local bike shops to | do maintenance on their bikes at affordable rates. The local | bike shops need a revenue stream beyond labor for maintenance | to be affordable. | | I don't agree with this reasoning. Why wouldn't maintenance be | priced at the true rate? In what way is it better for consumers | to overpay for their equipment in order to underpay for | maintenance? | ljf wrote: | I didn't read it to say that, just that it is very hard to be | a mechanic only shop - they also need to sell something else | to be a profitable business. | | In London there a few mechanics/coffee shops that stayed | profitable that way. | | If more people cycled I'm sure you would see more 'just | mechanics' but in most places they can't afford to be that. | mikepurvis wrote: | An acquaintance of mine tried to do the cafe/sales/repair | thing [1]; he went more high end on all three, selling | fancy drinks, pricey Dutch cargo bikes, etc. It didn't work | out. I think they lasted ~3 years, though it was clear by | the end that the writing was on the wall. | | [1]: https://twitter.com/berlinbikecafe | southerntofu wrote: | > he went more high end on all three | | Maybe that was the problem there? | JCharante wrote: | Yeah high-end cafe seems like a tough sell. A cheap cafe | to go to during group rides sounds great for having | people learn about your high end service shop. | mikepurvis wrote: | I feel like high end bike service in general is a tough | sell unless you have a huge local club-ride community of | people whose time is extremely valuable. | | I know someone who operated a Velofix van for a few | years, and I used it a few times, but the minimum cost | was basically $100+. For that much coin, I would just | walk my bike home or take it on the bus. Particularly if | it was something like a flat tire where I know I can fix | it myself at home for a few dollars. | mikepurvis wrote: | Possibly, but it was also not a large storefront, and | it's been replaced by a boutique donut shop. It's down | the street from a creperie, a wine bar, and some other | bistro thing. There used to be a health food store on | this block. | | Basically just saying that some combination of floor | space, rent and other fixed costs, etc etc led to | pursuing a higher-end business model and it didn't work | out. There may be lots of reasons for that, but one of | the principles here is that you need to be able to bike | to your bike store-- it's not fulfilling its purpose if | it's in a power center plaza that you need to drive to. | jandrese wrote: | Bikes are pretty low maintenance, the repairs are usually | fairly simple, and the parts are cheap. It's hard to make | margins on a low price low volume service. If a bike is | really damaged it usually makes more sense to just replace | it wholesale. | | If e-bikes take off they could help. There are a lot more | moving parts to break and especially electrical issues to | track down. Electrical issues are real moneymakers in | diagnostic fees on cars. | scoofy wrote: | The reason is that the price elasticity of demand for bikes, | outside of, say, the netherlands, is extremely elastic. Your | counter-argument presumes that cycling can't just fail, that | the prices are inelastic enough to support mechanic-only | shops. | | I truly believe that cycling, as an activity, can just fail | and cease to exist. It _has_ ceased to exist in many areas in | America. Many, many, many novice cyclists would rather | abandon cycling than pay a large premium on bicycle | maintenance. Perhaps there is a different business model that | would work, but I see the large manufacturers as having in | interest in creating an environment where maintenance service | can be delivered at-cost. | hinkley wrote: | The mechanics end up helping pay for the building and profit | margin, same as everything else in the shop. There's a price | point where you can keep your mechanics running at 90% every | day, and that may or may not pay for the building. | notriddle wrote: | It's not that simple. If you own a brick-and-mortar store of | any kind, there are a lot of costs other than labor and | parts, like the building itself, marketing, security, and | attending the desk or phone. A lot of these costs won't go | down if the store stops selling new bikes; they're flat, or | there's some minimum amount that you can possibly buy. | jandrese wrote: | I have a local bike shop that I would like to support, but | they stock only the cheapest no-name parts and charge way | more than the premium parts on Amazon. | | I went to get a replacement inner tube--nothing special, just | a 26x1.95 with a Schrader valve--and all they had was some | Chinese brand (Hilong or something like that?) for $35. I | want to support local businesses, but come on. The only thing | they offered over Amazon is that they would install it for | you for a modest $50 in labor. | | They also basically don't stock anything under $800 if you | are looking to buy a bike, and even those are Giant brand | mountain bikes with trash tier hardware. I went looking for | something I could commute to work on every day and they were | trying to sell so much fragile carbon fiber stuff that was | miles outside of my budget range. I don't need to shave | 5/10ths off of my commute, I want low maintenance, comfort, | and ruggedness. Apparently that's totally uncool and biking | is all about ultralight and ultrahard--feel every crack in | the pavement through the hard plastic saddle! I wasn't | impressed with the line about "it's more comfortable because | you use less energy to get there". | JCharante wrote: | It sounds like a local bike shop isn't really what you're | looking for. Under $800 a Decathlon/triban road bike is | pretty decent. | | There are commuter bikes for $100 but it's just not worth | servicing them because telling someone it'll be 40% of the | original bike price in labor + parts to fix something not | major is hard for them to accept. | | > low maintenance, comfort, and ruggedness. Apparently | that's totally uncool and biking is all about ultralight | and ultrahard--feel every crack in the pavement through the | hard plastic saddle! | | Carbon is more comfortable by reducing the vibrations that | you'll feel compared to aluminum. | | The reason why they stock shitty parts is because they | appear to service really cheap bikes and for people who buy | cheap bikes, that's what they want. I know many shops who | wouldn't service cheap bikes and I know many shops where | they would but I wouldn't trust them with my more expensive | Trek road bike. So it's strange that they also stock carbon | frames. | maxerickson wrote: | They insinuate the shop marks the price of the tube up | ~10x and charges $100+ an hour for simple labor. | | You don't seem to respond to those things. | ShroudedNight wrote: | > it's more comfortable because you use less energy to get | there | | I wonder if these people are internally consistent enough | to eschew the use of ramps or pulleys. | asdff wrote: | The next thing the industry has to do is spend some of this | unprecedented COVID profit on lobbying for more bike lanes. My | word. What's the point of a bike if it feels too dangerous | taking it out on the roads sharing lanes with these | reckless/distracted/intoxicated drivers? The auto industry | lobbied for highways. It's time for the bike industry to play | ball and do the same. | scoofy wrote: | Absolutely. | chapium wrote: | Bike lanes, as implemented in the US are a gift to cars and | are down right dangerous. They communicate to drivers that | bikes are designated to a lane when they are not. This is the | style of lane than runs along the left side of the road with | parking on the outside. They are designed with minimal buffer | space (if any) and are right in the doorzone. What use is a | bikelane that can be doored? Also, if a driver wants to make | a right-hand turn, they must turn through a bikelane that is | in a straight line direction. How does that make sense? We | don't put our turn lanes for cars to cut across straight | lanes. | | Bikelanes also are mostly just there (in practice) for | rideshare services and delivery services to drop off goods. | This isn't necessarily a bad thing, given the problems with | right turns and doorings mentioned earlier. It is problematic | in name however, but because new cyclists treat them as | actual bike lanes and are just gambling with the probability | of eventionally getting hit. | | We should have more bike infrastructure, but putting money | into this garbage is a mistake. | itsbrass wrote: | This echoes a lot of my feelings about bike lanes, do you | have any references to traffic studies or the like showing | that these kinds of lanes are, indeed, more dangerous? | | I'd be especially curious to know what the good | alternatives are. | | IIRC physical dividers like reflector poles actually do | make bike lanes safer, and sharrows are mixed on whether or | not they make lanes more effective. | scoofy wrote: | >I'd be especially curious to know what the good | alternatives are. | | Open Streets: https://openstreetsproject.org/ | TomVDB wrote: | I've noticed in various places in the Bay Area that new and | improved bike lanes are being added. | | A good example is a Bubb Rd, the part north of McClellan, in | Cupertino (which has a bunch of Apple offices): much improved | signalization and there's now a bumper divider between the | car and bike lane, making it very safe. | | They also added much improved commuter bus access islands. | | This is just one example. There are others. I don't know if | it's because of COVID or because these things were already | planned, but the lack of usual commuter and school traffic | definitely made it easier to do the work. | Swizec wrote: | > if it feels too dangerous taking it out on the roads | sharing lanes with these reckless/distracted/intoxicated | drivers | | As a motorcyclist and former electric skateboard rider, | welcome! Everyone is trying to kill you and it's always your | fault. | | Cemeteries are full of people who had right of way. | mikepurvis wrote: | Am a current cyclist and eskate rider, and I also bike on | (not busy) roads with my young kids. Nothing I hate more | than being honked- or yelled-at to "just go" when I have | the right of way but am exercising an abundance of caution | to make absolutely certain I'm not about to get ploughed by | a car which may or may not come to a stop. | deathanatos wrote: | Yeah, an awful lot of drivers seem to forget that1 I have | the _right_ to the entire lane, even as a cyclist. If you | don 't like it, you can use the other lane, if there is | one, to go around me. If there isn't -- tough! Am if I | _am_ occupying the entire lane, there is almost certainly | a _reason_ for it -- like an upcoming left or because | there isn 't sufficient room for you to pass. Because if | there weren't, fighting with a car is not high on my list | of priorities: I'd much rather scootch over, give you | room to get by so you can speed of into the sunset and I | can have an empty road to myself. | | 1IANAL; in the jurisdiction I'm in, but my understanding | is that this is common | nicoburns wrote: | That's definitely the law here in the UK, although FWIW | most of the time I don't feel the need to occupy the | whole lane. Cars generally pass _reasonably_ safely here, | plus there generally isn 't another lane on the kind of | road I'd be cycling on. | ian-g wrote: | Hilariously, sometimes I feel most comfortable on a bike in | the road when I'm being a slight bit unsafe. | | If I keep to the edge of the lane folks pass by me really | close. If I'm going back and forth a bit and taking a whole | lane up, cars give me the entire lane. It's wonderful | walshemj wrote: | Exactly don't ride in the Gutter and also don't under | take stopped traffic aggressively | manachar wrote: | Not just bike lanes, but urban/suburban planning based on | pedestrian and bicycle traffic. | | Watching subdivisions going in with utterly unfriendly | approaches to people who want to get around with anything but | a car is horrific to me. | crispyambulance wrote: | You are right that we need local bike shops but I don't think | we need more major chain shops. Admittedly a chain shop is | better than NO shop at all if that's what you're dealing with | in your area. In Philly, the Performance bike shop went out of | business while many of the smaller independent shops have | survived. | | The good news is that bicycle fashion has tended towards more | "city bikes" in the last decade or so. These have fewer frills | and thus are simpler (== more durable) and also more | maintainable by someone who is willing to learn the basics. The | "basics" would be lube, fixing flats, brake maintenance and | simple shifter adjustments. I think that's better than the | earlier trends of "mountain bikes" with too many parts and | stuff that's too hard to adjust for people without enough | tools. | ian-g wrote: | God, that maintenance thing is really a huge factor. | | I used to be a bike tech. Somebody ordering a $5000 mountain | bike might take a full day to put together. But if you gave | me $5000 in cruiser bikes, I could have them all put together | well and get some maintenance done. I really loathe how | cruisers look, but goddamn they're some of the sturdiest | pieces of junk I've ever worked on | mtnGoat wrote: | one of the bike stores in my town was bought by trek, now you | can only buy expensive parts there. they dont sell anything | low end or for beginners. the cheapest kids bike they sell | was $200, lowest priced helmet was $80. | scoofy wrote: | Look, I mean, I totally agree with you, but we're living in | this system, and I'm terrified of the what happened to the | bookstore industry happening to the local bike shop industry. | | You look at the towns that still have quality book stores. | You have a few cities that have thriving bookstores: Boston | (likely because of students) and SF (likely because of | cultural nostalgia and real estate laws, but these are now | failing). You then have the consolidation model, where cities | have one good bookstore that can compete against amazon: NYC | (The Strand), Austin (Bookpeople), Portland (Powell's). | | My point is that i would rather the cities follow this | consolidation model than fail. You have one, trusted brand | within the town, whose entire business model is built on | quality and trust, because all parties know there's a cheaper | alternative. This is where performance bikes failed, as they | sacrificed quality service for price competitiveness. I was | actively advising my friends to avoid their mechanics like | the plague. The Trek shop seems to be moving in the other | direction, as a boutique, with reasonably trusted service, so | long as your using their products and, like apple, the added | cost premium they charge. | | This is not idealism, this is a practical model based on what | is honestly a sense of fatalism. The automobile system we | have is a path-dependent clusterfuck, and we have to be, not | just willing, but be happy to take less than ideal outcomes | to fight for real alternatives. | dheera wrote: | Here's the other side of the story. | | For a long time I was a student (yes, I did a PhD). I didn't | have the cash for local bike shops. | | Buying and supporting local is a luxury for the rich. I could | not afford the $600 bikes they were selling. I bought $150 used | bikes on Craigslist and repaired them myself. And no, not with | parts from the bike shop. I could get the same parts at half | price online, including from Amazon. Usually I could tune up a | $150 bike for another $25 in parts and that's a lot cheaper | than $600. | | If local bike shops want my business, and pretty much the | business of students in general, they need to get with the beat | and be cheaper than Amazon. | | Oh btw -- last week I changed my bike pedals for one that I got | on Amazon for $20. I have never seen a bike shop sell such good | pedals at this price point. I have never even seen a bike shop | sell this brand ("ROCKBROS"). They usually sell some super | expensive brand like Shimano only. They also seem to have | politics against selling competing brands sometimes, and Amazon | has none of that bullcrap, you see all the brands and you buy | the best. | zwieback wrote: | Agreed. Bike shop business models are problematic and it's | worth shopping around. My local shops sell a lot of stuff at | reasonable prices and we have 4 shops in walking distance of | each other so there's some competition but at times it feels | like being ripped off. And it feels worse being ripped off by | your neighbor somehow. When that happens I don't feel bad | about getting stuff from nashbar or similar. | | Pedals are a good example, ridiculously overpriced at the | shops. Luckily we have a non-profit called "The Bike | Collective" that strips donated bikes and sells parts super | cheap, they also help with repairs. | scoofy wrote: | >Buying and supporting local is a luxury for the rich. | | This is extremely myopic. The entire point of cycling-as- | transit, is that, as an investment, it's _by far_ the most | inexpensive alternative. If you 're under the assumption that | you'll already have a car, or free access to transit, or live | on campus, then I see your argument. However, cycling _as an | alternative to these things_ is wildly, wildly inexpensive, | even factoring in bikes that cost thousands of dollars. | | The cost of luxuriously maintaining a bicycle is about | $100-$200 annually. The cost of maintaining an automobile is | about $8000 annually, it's just that the costs are broken up | into micropayments on things like fuel or hiding in the | depreciation. | dheera wrote: | First of all I didn't own a car. You're right that it's | several thousand dollars annually and that's why I didn't | own a car. | | > The cost of luxuriously maintaining a bicycle is about | $100-$200 annually | | That's if you fix it yourself. I spent <$100/year on | maintaining my bike. | | Changing brake pads at a bike shop cost upwards of $60. | Wheel truing, probably >$200. Attempting to buy brake pads | and refusing brake pad changing service usually involved a | stupid long conversation with them to convince them you | didn't need service, and they would price gouge you on the | brake pads. With Amazon it cost me a grand total of $8 for | the new pads, shipping included, and not having to convince | anyone that I'm competent at fixing my own bicycle. | | I once had a pedal stuck in my crank and just needed a | longer wrench with more leverage to get it out. Damn bike | shop wouldn't sell me the wrench. They wanted to do it | themselves and charged me fucking $40 for TWO MINUTES of | work. WTF. Needless to say I never visited that shop again. | spamizbad wrote: | Local bike shops aren't exactly rolling in dough. If you | ask your local car mechanic how much they'd charge to | remove a stuck bolt you'll also encounter a labor minimum | that'll be a lot more than $40. | dheera wrote: | Sure, but that's not really my problem. I'm not rolling | in dough either, and that's why I don't usually use local | bike shops. | | If they want my business, they need to match what I can | afford _somehow_. | scoofy wrote: | Again... I don't care about how much you, or I, spend on | bikes. I'm a nerd, I do most of the work myself. You seem | like that too. | | I'm talking about cost _in relation to alternatives_. If | the cost in relation to alternatives is low, then you can | easily afford luxurious maintenance, as you 'd be | spending the same money, and lots more, paying for any | alternative. | dheera wrote: | Well yes, if the alternatives are viable. | | For someone on grad student income, owning a car is | largely not viable, it's not even an alternative that is | remotely in sight. | JCharante wrote: | The problem is that there's two types of people who ride | bikes. | | Commuters who want to spend less than $200 on just something | to get them moving, parents riding with their kids are also | here. | | Cyclists who spent 10-20-40 hours per week on a bike. For a | hobby that you spend 60hr/mo on it's reasonable to spend | $1300 on an entry level road bike and much more as you | progress. Especially because it's good for your health. | | Obviously there's money to be made with cyclists, but | commuters would be so cheap and budget concerned that there's | no money to be made from it. | | Amazon is perfect because you're not looking for quality. I | use a rockbros sweat catcher for my indoor training bike | setup and it's great because it's just fabric. | | You want LBS to stock $20 pedals? Who is going to buy them? | What would the margins on that be? I wouldn't trust $20 | clipless pedals (because if they fail you will get | hurt/injured) and if they're flat pedals then bmx people | would buy flat, but they're going to be so heavy that it'll | be bad performance wise. There's only broke students who | would buy it, and at that point just get it from Amazon. | walshemj wrote: | I am looking at a bike for commuting and as this will be | multimodal - that means a Brompton which is well over | PS1200. | | Oh and trying to find one in stock is a nightmare in the UK | most be even worse else where. | dheera wrote: | If you're looking for cheaper, look into Dahon bikes, | they're decent value and much cheaper. Especially if you | can get a used one that has been kept well, you can often | get it for less than half of the MSRP. | dheera wrote: | So ... | | I spend a lot of time on a bike. I don't spend $1300 on | bikes. | | There are people who want the latest carbon fiber blah blah | just because they are using it for sport. I have no problem | with them. But I have my current $200 Craigslist bike, it | would have been $900 MSRP, but it rides fine, it's a little | heavier than those carbon fiber things but so what? I get | more exercise, and worry slightly less about theft, which | buys me a LOT of freedom because I can just lock it up in | downtown San Francisco and enjoy my day. If it gets stolen | I just buy another bike, no biggie. If my landlord | confiscates it, I just buy another bike, no biggie.* | | Yeah, I agree, it's reasonable to spend $1300. If you have | $1300. But it's also okay to NOT want to spend $1300 and | still want to take it up as a serious hobby. I for one am | pretty happy with my $200 bike. | | I don't use clip pedals, I just use flat pedals, and these | $20 aluminum flat pedals are nice and solid. I tried SPD | clips before and hated that stuff. To each is own. | | I have done many long distance trips, and I _avoid_ | proprietary or hard-to-find components because it 's | awesome that I can find replacement components in some | random village in rural China or rural Myanmar or rural | anywhere I go. | | *Saves me on rent anyway because apartments in my area with | proper bike storage OR enough apartment sqftage to store | bikes inside have rent rates higher than my current rent | plus the cost of a new bike per month. It still saves me | money to stay at my current cheap apartment, lock bike to | the pool fence (because property manager refuses to install | bike racks on the premises), get it confiscated every now | and then, and keep buying new bikes. | XnoiVeX wrote: | For someone so value sensitive, what is keeping you in | SFO inspite of the insanely high rents? That's money down | the drain unless you can justify it. | [deleted] | jrd259 wrote: | Kerson and his team asked buyers at every retailer who stocks PNW | parts to remove them from their Amazon stores too, so that | everyone involved could maximize their profits and not undercut | each other. | | IANAL, but is this not collusion or price fixing? | lardo wrote: | This is pretty much how local bike shops work. | InitialLastName wrote: | Aren't manufacturers (and branders) normally able to set the | minimum advertised prices of their products, in addition to | making suggestions (backed by "if you break the rules, we won't | sell this to you any more") about how and where retailers can | sell and advertise the product? | lardo wrote: | Do they actually make things or are they just selling branded | white-label parts? | | https://www.ziprecruiter.com/c/PNW-Components-LLC/Jobs | PascLeRasc wrote: | Their dropper posts are rebranded TranzX parts as far as I | know, which is supposedly common: | https://stravaigingmtb.com/2017/11/27/so-who-the-hell-made-t... | | I heard before that Trek does the same thing with their | Bontrager posts. | Matthias247 wrote: | Define "make". Often companies are doing specifications and | blueprints, but outsource the actual manufacturing to other | companies. I think this would also apply to PNW, since their | products (like the seatpost) are afaik not known to be just | relabeled versions of other products. | pizzaknife wrote: | i prefer to work on my bicycle. This is both a privilege and a | luxury and i recognize such. PNW components are wonderful. I shop | LBS for tools and "need it today" parts. I do not find value in | paying the majority of bike mechanics (ive been scraping my shins | religiously for 32yrs and part of what gives me confidence in | jumping them tens of feet into the arm at the ripe age of | midlife). I do, however, find value in shop talk and buying the | right tools / components (even if special ordered through the | shops). Its a mixed bag of bolts | silicon2401 wrote: | Personally I find local bike and book shops to be excellent | alternatives to Amazon. For tech stuff I go to Best Buy where | possible (not exactly a local shop, but at least it's still | competition for Amazon). Nice to see the suppliers themselves | pull out of Amazon. | mym1990 wrote: | As an additional benefit, local bike shops and book shops also | usually have some pretty cool people working there! | HWR_14 wrote: | I went to a manufacturer's website recently to buy something | direct (cut out the middle man, better for everyone, yay!) The | price was double that on Amazon. And they charged shipping. I | get that bringing wearhousing in house has to cost more money, | but it was just strange to see that dramatic a discount. | jonahhorowitz wrote: | Best Buy is great for electronics. They have control over their | supply chain and you don't have to deal with counterfeits. | [deleted] | Loic wrote: | Ortlieb[0], the very appreciated maker of bicycle bags, is not | selling over Amazon. They are selling online, but your | order/payment is sent directly to a local shop delivering to you | (in Germany). I really like it. | | Some years ago, Amazon was pushing "Ortlieb bag" adverts on | Google to redirect to Amazon where the bags were not to be found | and was sued. Amazon lost[1]. | | [0]: https://www.ortlieb.com | | [1]: https://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/ortlieb-gegen- | am... | Symbiote wrote: | I was very impressed with Ortlieb when I was able to buy a | replacement part, for about EUR3, for a 15 year old bag. | | I will be a lifelong customer, but the bags are so durable I | might never need another for myself. | progbits wrote: | Similarly Peak Design (a well respected brand of quality camera | gear including backpacks) is not selling on Amazon. See recent | HN thread [0] about Amazon making a cheap knock-off of their | product. | | [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26338525 | FrameworkFred wrote: | I suspect this is a trend that'll continue as market buyers and | sellers realize Amazon is a poor fit for certain of their | activities. | | I already avoid Amazon as a consumer when the brand, quality, or | delivery date really counts. | | But I also avoid Lowes when I'm buying appliances for tenant | properties because they can't be relied upon to call before they | deliver. And I don't buy from Harbor Freight Tools when equipment | failure might be fatal because some things I've bought there | haven't survived their first use. | | But those places have saved me a ton of money over the years when | their model has worked to my benefit, just like Amazon has made a | vast improvement in certain areas of my life. | | I suspect companies like PNC are coming to similar realizations | about Amazon as they see that their returns (or the implications | on their reputations, or their confidence in continued sales) | paint a picture that's less attractive than pursuing | alternatives. | mtnGoat wrote: | fact of the matter is... if you are a cyclist, amazon is | definitely not the place to look for bike parts. sadly, all the | SEO spammers only advertise amazon affiliate links so you'd think | amazon sells decent bike parts, but you'd be wrong. IMHO google | should ban any website heavily linking to amazon affiliate | program. | IncRnd wrote: | From the article: "PNW wasn't the only business growing tired of | Amazon. Kerson and his team asked buyers at every retailer who | stocks PNW parts to remove them from their Amazon stores too, so | that everyone involved could maximize their profits and not | undercut each other." ... "We set up these calls and we were not | expecting them to go very well," says Marshall, "As soon as we | started talking about it the buyers were really excited." | | From the FTC: "Price fixing is an agreement (written, verbal, or | inferred from conduct) among competitors that raises, lowers, or | stabilizes prices or competitive terms ... Price fixing relates | not only to prices, but also to other terms that affect prices to | consumers, such as shipping fees, warranties, discount programs, | or financing rates. Antitrust scrutiny may occur when competitors | discuss the following topics: ..., Capacity, Identity of | customers, ... Defendants may not justify their behavior by | arguing that the prices were reasonable to consumers, were | necessary to avoid cut-throat competition, or stimulated | competition." [1] | | Is there a lawer who can say if that was price fixing? | | [1] https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition- | guidance/guide-a... | dstaley wrote: | IANAL, but I think this would qualify as a resale price | maintenance agreement[1], which is legal at a federal level and | in most (but not all!) states. I guess it really depends on | what exactly "not undercut each other" entailed. | | [1] | https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/resale_price_maintenance_agr... | [deleted] | r00fus wrote: | Is avoiding a major adversary/predatory channel considered | price-fixing? | IncRnd wrote: | It wasn't just avoidance of a channel. The company got on a | call and convinced all their retail outlets to maximize their | prices and minimize their costs (in the same way) while not | competing against each other. | Wohlf wrote: | Yes, if the effect/methods is the same. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-08-23 23:00 UTC)