[HN Gopher] Overuse of the word "the" in "Macbeth" ___________________________________________________________________ Overuse of the word "the" in "Macbeth" Author : rouli Score : 17 points Date : 2021-08-26 03:14 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (onezero.medium.com) (TXT) w3m dump (onezero.medium.com) | Steve_Baker77 wrote: | Paywall | yesenadam wrote: | I read this a few times, looking for evidence I missed that it's | a joke. Apparently not, but I can't be sure. If it's serious, | it's possibly the worst article I've ever read. | | > But fans of Macbeth often say its freaky qualities are deeper | than just the plot devices and characters. For centuries, people | been unsettled by the very language of the play. | | > Actors and critics have long remarked that when you read | Macbeth out loud, it feels like your voice and mouth and brain | are doing something ever so slightly wrong. There's something | subconsciously off about the sound of the play, and it spooks | people. It's as if Shakespeare somehow wove a tiny bit of | creepiness into every single line. The literary scholar George | Walton Williams described the "continuous sense of menace" and | "horror" that pervades even seemingly innocuous scenes. | | > For centuries, Shakespeare fans and theater folk have wondered | about this, but could never quite explain it. | | Um.. gee, in high school it was pointed out to me how constant | themes in _Macbeth_ are how unnatural things have become, how | everything is strange, qualities /values reversed from normal - | _fair is foul and foul is fair_ etc, animals doing weird things, | bad omens etc. It never stops, all the way through. I had to go | through the play and list how many animals are mentioned, doing | strange things. It 's constant. People meet in the play and it's | not "Lovely day isn't it" but an anecdote about how so-and-so saw | something incredibly weird and impossible happen. Over that | background is the quickly escalating paranoia and madness of | Macbeth & Lady Macbeth. Etc. Can't be bothered writing more, I | didn't want to say just "This is total nonsense.", but it is. | (Flagged.) | andensande wrote: | The conclusions of the article seem a bit far-fetched to me, and | seem to ignore the rhetorical style of poetry and theatre at the | time. One of the examples the author gives (where they missed a | contracted instance of "the"): | | > [...] Look like th' innocent flower,/But be the serpent under | 't. | | It is still acceptable in modern English to say something like | | > Seem like the innocent flower, but be as the serpent underneath | it. | | Certainly not casual, everyday speech -- but using a rhetorical | strategy of referring to an archetypal innocent flower, or an | archetypal serpent. I think it's an enormous stretch to claim | that Lady Macbeth and Macbeth had a specific innocent flower in | mind when they were speaking. | TillE wrote: | There's a little too much amateurish analysis here which doesn't | even attempt to distinguish between Early Modern English and 21st | century English, but ultimately I think the conclusion is | interesting and probably correct, that this helps set the tone of | the play. | edgyquant wrote: | Didn't Shakespeare kind of use his own version of English; even | by the standards of the day? | allturtles wrote: | I think this is just the way Shakespeare wrote, not anything | specific to Macbeth's 'creepiness.' I was able to quickly find a | similar example in Julius Caesar: | | "Then he offered it to him again; then he put it by again; but, | to my thinking, he was very loath to lay his fingers off it. And | then he offered it _the_ third time; he put it _the_ third time | by; " | | Or Much Ado About Nothing: | | "I have _the_ toothache. " | | It is not surprising that the way (a way?) articles are used has | changed in the last 400 years. | abathur wrote: | Use of "the" considered harmful. :) | sharkjacobs wrote: | That's a really interesting observation and fun analysis. I'm | going to reread Macbeth with this in mind and whether or not I | agree with all of the articles conclusions its a unique lens to | examine the text with. | [deleted] | karolisd wrote: | I'd wager the use of "the" is mostly about making the meter work | and having the iambic pentameter sound the way he wanted it to. | | This isn't a data science question. Especially if the data | science is blind to meter and to phonetics. | lupire wrote: | why "the" but not "a"? Same meter. | | But I agree it's silly that say "the" is what makes Macbeth | creepy, and not, you know, the occult theme that permeates it. | smoldesu wrote: | Precisely. 'the' is an easy single-syllable choice to pad out | your meter, so it makes perfect sense that it was abused here. | retrac wrote: | Shakespeare coined hundreds of neologisms presumably just to | make the verses scan. His English was never the best, honestly. | Like, in terms of being normal English. Much of his poetry was | odd even by the standards of the time. Creative odd, but odd. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-08-27 23:00 UTC)