[HN Gopher] Retailers are spending millions to combat organized ... ___________________________________________________________________ Retailers are spending millions to combat organized theft from stores Author : juokaz Score : 135 points Date : 2021-09-03 13:16 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com) | kneel wrote: | Going to CVS is a timesink now that I have to walk around and ask | employees to open cases for me. | | Why can't they use vending machines? | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Hang on, we've had literally thousands of years with stores | where you could pick up an item and run away, but don't. | | There is now are organized shoplifting crime groups, and your | solution is to design specialized vending machines for teeth | whitening strips, phone chargers, etc? | | I'm not saying it is a net good to deploy violence on poor | people. But don't you suppose that society would benefit | overall if there were physical and clear legal consequences to | shoplifting? | | Or do you really want the world to use vending machines for | everything? Aren't you concerned about climate change? Where do | you suppose all those vending machines would come from what how | are they powered? | kneel wrote: | I found vending machines on amazon, problem solved | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Initially I was considering this would be farming more | senseless production to China where you can feel good about | the pollution because it isn't seen, it isn't tallied, and | they won't conform to economic policies designed to curb | it. Ignoring the potential for slave labor and poor working | conditions. Then you have the shipping of vending machines | from China to all over the USA. Power, parts, these are | made cheaply to fail so probably while more replacements | than parts. | | All to treat 99% of people like criminals because we lack | the conviction to actually do something about a shoplifting | problem. | | But I have changed my mind. I was not aware vending | machines are available on Amazon. | wwweston wrote: | Online order for pickup is close, at least if you can wait 6-8 | hours for the order to process. | | Had this same experience with a Walmart a week ago, btw -- it | took me 15 minutes to _find_ one item I was looking for, and by | the time I realized that it was behind a glass door I 'd | already seen the lines of 8 people waiting for an employee to | help them get what they wanted. At that point, I did the math | on sunk vs further costs, set down the rest of my purchase, and | went on to pay twice as much elsewhere _and_ consider it a | bargain. | | The pandemic really created conditions that helped me realize | how much of retail shopping is a waste of time. | adamqureshi wrote: | Boosting has been going on since the 90's in NYC. Back in the day | i used to work on 34th/7th ave in NYC s selling leather jackets | in a rinky-dink store about 500 square fee. The boosters came in | groups some from Brooklyn some from uptown. They would boost | across the street from Macy's and sell the stolen goods right | across the street or on the streets. They would go store to small | shops and sell Georgio armani , versace to the employees who | worked there and to tourists on the streets ( those brands where | hot back then) some boosters even started taking orders,. there | were independent operators( not with the pack) and others who | would roll with the pack. Each booster specialized in boosting a | product. Some would only do designer clothing while others would | lift electronics and they would sell to tourists on the street or | store clerks working in shops, I even bought a nice Armani suite | from them one day. They had figured out how to beat all security | alarms in macy's and someone then figured out that you could | return what you stole from Macy's without a receipt during the | holidays so boosters then started to return what they stole back | to Macy's and Macy's would cut them a check for it. This was | around 1995. Some boosters tried to lift stuff from the store I | was working in and I had to go and stop them , one time we had | throw down right in front of our store to get the leather jackets | back. I even had to go run after a few. Macy's security guards | can't do jack. The cops had more important things todo I guess. | The boosters would grab and bag and just run out the door and | into the train and vanish. They had some aluminum foil around the | bag they put the stuff in so the alarms did not go off. They | would go downtown. Uptown and after the city got to HOT they | started going to the suburban malls. It was like a syndicate. I | guess it's still happening now. | canada_dry wrote: | Right before the pandemic the gov't run liquor stores in Ontario | were being robbed of stock in the middle of the day. Staff called | police and then stood back. If police bothered to appear it was | usually hours later. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_t5WHvPv1g | | Possibly organized boosting, but as soon as word spread it became | wildly popular for a few weeks. | jellicle wrote: | Nobody working on wage theft by employers, by far the largest | organized theft ring running. | EarthIsHome wrote: | Wage theft reported in Iowa using unpaid overtime as an | example: | http://www.iowapolicyproject.org/images/150818-wagetheft-Fig... | | EPI has some good articles as well: | https://www.epi.org/publication/wage-theft-bigger-problem-fo... | missedthecue wrote: | I wonder what the value of the inverse of this is - time | theft. How many employees are paid to be on the clock but are | not working? I bet it's in the hundreds of billions per year | nationwide. | conductr wrote: | The EPI article gives some interesting & specific examples of | wage theft. However, I think that term and the discussion | around it gives the impression that large corporations are | looking for opportunities to steal employees wages. When I | skim these examples I see a few honest mistakes / bad | policies but mostly small likely bankrupt/distressed | companies trying to keep the wheels from falling off their | business. It's like a ponzi scheme falling apart, payroll | checks bounce, tips get stolen, employees are asked to do | something while clocked out, etc. Because many businesses | have insufficient working capital, this just happens. | | Let's take a relative look at the problem | | > wage theft is costing workers more than $50 billion a year. | | $50B / $6.5T [0] = 0.77% of wages are "stolen" | | While not good and $50B is a huge amount, I'd argue this is | not much of a problem but a rounding error. Unless we require | some level of capitalization or reserves by small businesses, | a large portion of this will never go away. I would be | shocked if even half the restitutions were paid, this forced | bankruptcy for most of these businesses I would guess. | | [0]: https://www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and- | wages-an... | noasaservice wrote: | If employee steals from store, they're fired and arrested. | | If store steals from an employee, they're told to pound | sand at a state level office and hope and pray that some | mid-level bureaucrat looks into the issue and writes a | "stern letter". | throw_m239339 wrote: | > Nobody working on wage theft by employers, by far the largest | organized theft ring running. | | Wage theft is absolutely a reality and an injustice that needs | to be punished as much as petty theft if not more. But 2 wrongs | don't make a right. Both kind of theft need to be prosecuted, | especially when it's an organized group, and all the businesses | that allow fencing stolen goods need to have the book thrown at | them if they don't take serious measures to limit these | practices. | dls2016 wrote: | Unfortunately one has been deemed a "civil matter" and you | won't read any reporting about it in WSJ or Forbes. | Hilariously, wage theft is much more organized than any | shoplifting conspiracy. | bko wrote: | > The target was no ordinary shoplifter. He was part of a network | of organized professionals, known as boosters, whom CVS had been | monitoring for weeks. The company believed the group responsible | for stealing almost $50 million in products over five years from | dozens of stores in Northern California. | | The story isn't about people selling stolen goods on Amazon. It's | about organized theft operations. One way to stop theft is to | reduce the ability to sell stolen goods, but that infringes on | ownership rights of a large number of people that want to sell | things online. I'm sure large corporations would love it if you | can't buy their goods second hand. | | At the end of the day, protecting property rights is a job for | the state. Since it sounds its being organized, the criminal | organization might be exploiting recent changes in sentencing and | prosecution: | | > Retail investigators blame changes in sentencing laws in some | states for an uptick in thefts. In California, a 2014 law | downgraded the theft of less than $950 worth of goods to a | misdemeanor from a felony. Target recently reduced its operating | hours in five San Francisco stores, citing rising thefts. | baybal2 wrote: | A simpler way -- just put all merchandise behind the glass. Any | touching only with supervision of a store manager. | Animats wrote: | Then you need more staff. | | I was trying to buy some allergy spray at CVS, and couldn't | get anyone to unlock the case. So I left and ordered it | online from Costco, at 1/3 the price. | ganoushoreilly wrote: | Sadly a lot of the more risky chains do this pretty | regularly. I was in a best buy a few years ago where almost | everything was behind glass. I wonder what that does to the | minds of locals shopping and feeling like they're always | under lock and key. It can't be healthy. | incone123 wrote: | Also requires more staff to get the goods to the customer. | It used to be normal for everything in a store to be behind | the counter, and you got served. But self service is | cheaper for the store, unless/until we reach a tipping | point regarding thefts. | nradov wrote: | For many customers that eliminates the only advantage of | shopping at a brick & mortar store. If you have to ask store | staff for everything then it's easier to shop online. | | Cities are destroying their own business districts and losing | sales tax revenue by refusing to enforce shoplifting laws. | Gunax wrote: | I think it's okay to mention the effect Amazon is having | without blaming them. Ultimately online person-to-person | trading is making fencing items easier and the people buying | probably don't know they are purchasing stolen items. Amazon | isn't the thesis, but it is disrupting the stolen goods market | in the same way automoboles and highways lead to a spike in | bank robbery. | | I grew up in a poor area and we had a neighborhood fence. Let's | call him 'Casey' since that was his name. Everyone knew Casey | was selling stolen items and there was sort of a joke in the | town about getting a 'Casey discount'. It sounds like Casey is | probably operating an Amazon store now. | kevinpet wrote: | I'm concerned about lawlessness, but if the only alternative is | that $950 theft is a _felony_ that's messed up. This seems more | like a case of not being able to deal with crime than lax | sentencing. | bushbaba wrote: | If each item had a unique id. And the stores could indicate | unique ids that are stolen. The. Amazon & eBay could monitor | and prevent stolen merchandise | literallyaduck wrote: | You could probably get some milage with just a local store id | and date on the box. If you want to get cute you could change | the pill stamp. | nitrogen wrote: | Everything is easy if you assume a panopticon. | [deleted] | sneak wrote: | We already have the panopticon, we might as well get some | fucking benefits from it. | | As it is I'm paying both for hard drives in Utah for the | NSA to store my contacts and photos and track logs, then | again (formerly) for iCloud to do it a second time. It's | inefficient. | nonameiguess wrote: | If it's actually organized crime, then they can be prosecuted | under RICO statutes, which allows for much stronger sentencing | than shoplifting ever would have. Robbery is one of the 35 | crimes included under the "racketeering" umbrella. | floren wrote: | The SF city government seems to have realized that there's | another way to make crime "go down": refuse to prosecute for | anything, ideally make it pointless for the cops to even show | up, until people stop bothering to report crime. Wow, | shoplifting is at record lows! | nikanj wrote: | Same with bike theft in Vancouver. Nobody bothers reporting | it, so the statistics aren't too bad | the-dude wrote: | Isn't there any incentive for your claim on your theft | insurance? | blacksmith_tb wrote: | It's fairly uncommon to have insurance specifically for | your bicycle, so most people would be filing claims | against their renters' (if they have it) or homeowners' | insurance. Given the size of those deductibles ($500 is | the US average for homeowners', I would think Canada is | similar [1]) lots of people would just buy another bike | that costs less. | | 1: https://www.insurance.com/home-and-renters- | insurance/home-in... | pvtprop wrote: | Corporations want taxes cut to nothing and complain when the | public doesn't want to protect their private property. | | Funny how that works. | | I notice it's WSJ complaining. | | More "government is inept" sentiment to justify private | armies. | neither_color wrote: | We're approaching a strange post-empirical world where the | right chart or graph can be used to justify any public | policy, and often changing how the data for the chart is | collected, analyzed and presented is easier than solving the | issue. The collective anecdotes of thousands/millions of | people can be dismissed because the chart says otherwise. | | Disagree that crime in your neighborhood has dropped? Just | because your car has been broken into and your neighbor got | robbed doesnt mean there's a trend. Anecdotes arent data. Do | you have a source for that? | seph-reed wrote: | This is a toughy. | | People who don't believe in covid vaccines -- for instance | -- are living in a world of anecdotes, untrusting of easily | manipulable data. | | But it's where we're at. In a world where you can't trust | the data and your friends are addicted to consuming | propaganda, what the fuck is truth? | ZeroGravitas wrote: | In your opinion, did the multi-decade drop in American | crime, regularly discussed by academics who have some | tentative theories to explain it, happen or was it all | faked? | | https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis- | opinion/amer... | sabarn01 wrote: | murders are hard to fake. The rest of crime data is more | subjective than people realize. I was robbed at gunpoint | for 1$. I did not report the crime. | sizzle wrote: | That's really scary, over a damn dollar?!? | | What was the context here if you don't mind sharing, why | one dollar and not your whole wallet? Why pull a gun?? | Isn't that a felony? Won't police respond immediately to | the report of someone threatening your life via | brandishing a gun in public (more people in danger if not | caught)? | rahimnathwani wrote: | Usually robbers pull the gun _before_ determining how | much money the victim has in their wallet. | | They could ask the potential victim first, and then, if | the value is too low, not bother pulling a gun. But all | potential victims have an incentive to lie and say they | only have $1. Knowing that, a rational robber would pull | a gun without requesting the info first. | | Regarding police responding immediately: you can't call | the police until after robber has lowered their gun | and/or left the scene. So by the time you call the | police, you're no longer being threatened. | sabarn01 wrote: | They walked up and indicated they had a gun in their | pocket. They had a buddy that was across the street. They | asked for 1$ which is what I gave them. Other people I | knew in the area were also robbed at gunpoint for 1$, but | on their porch. They did call the cops. | | As for why I don't know. | sabarn01 wrote: | Also the police don't come quickly in most places. My | wife was pistol whipped and it took 30 minutes to get a | car to our house 1 mile from the station. Also I lived in | a bad neighborhood for a long time so this may not be | typical. | scythe wrote: | > In your opinion [...] was it all faked? | | Please don't flamebait. The poster is talking about year- | on-year changes in a neighborhood, not decade-on-decade | changes in a whole country. The relevance of personal | experience is drastically higher in the first case. | | But I think it's worth noting that "crime is rising" and | "crime is not rising" tend to be aliases for the real | opinions: "crime is too high" and "crime is not too | high". | 908B64B197 wrote: | It's all real. | | Violent crimes had a multi-decade drop. SF is a very | localized anomaly in regards to property crimes. | adventured wrote: | Definitely not localized. | | Los Angeles and New York to name two other prominent | cities, are drowning in an epic ongoing crime wave. | | SF, LA, NYC all have the same malfunction in terms of | city governance. | | LA - | | LA Mag, July 2021: "'It's a Puzzle': Experts Are Trying | to Figure Out What's Causing L.A.'s Crime Wave" | | A puzzle. Experts. Ha ha ha ha. Ha. Bullshit. | | https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/crime-in-los-angeles/ | | NYC - | | "NYPD Announces Citywide Crime Statistics for May 2021" | | "For the month of May 2021, overall index crime in New | York City rose 22% compared with May 2020, driven by a | 46.7% increase in robbery (1,182 v. 806) and a 35.6% | increase in grand larceny (2,848 v. 2,101). Felony | assault saw a 20.5% increase compared to May 2020 (1,979 | v. 1,643), and shooting incidents increased to 173 v. 100 | in May 2020 (+73%)." | | https://www1.nyc.gov/site/nypd/news/pr0603/nypd-citywide- | cri... | | Some of that is Covid reductions in 2020 (year over year | comps), and some of it is still up considerably over 2019 | figures. Murders in May were up 100% vs 2019 for example, | burglaries were up around 17%. Felony assaults were up | slightly vs 2019. Grand larceny was up about 25% vs 2019. | j_walter wrote: | That was real and everyone can agree on that based on | what they see as well as the data. However you can't go | to a single SF neighborhood and find people that think | crime has dropped recently. There are boatloads of | articles about people having their cars broken into so | often they leave them unlocked because replacing windows | was so expensive. Videos of people shoplifting while | security stands by and does nothing because of the laws. | Articles about criminals that kill someone but had been | in and out of the system for years with fairly severe | crimes but always let off by a rouge DA or out on bail | (or without bail because bail is racist). | | https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/sf-da-announces- | homici... | CardenB wrote: | ??? A couple of months ago I literally saw a man get | tackled for stealing ties from a high end store in SF | nearby union square. | pjc50 wrote: | Unintentional consequences of the California three strikes | law perhaps? Prosecutors unwilling to hand out mandatory 25 | year sentences for petty theft? | liber8 wrote: | This is not how the three-strike law works. You don't get a | life sentence for petty theft. | | Under Penal Code section 667(e), you can receive a life | term if you are convicted of a serious or violent felony | AND you have twice before been convicted of serious and | violent felonies. See https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa | ces/codes_displaySectio... | Stronico wrote: | Nice catch actually | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Shoplifting is at record lows. Shoplifting is at record | highs. Ah, forced perspective. | neutronicus wrote: | Baltimore, too | | But the nice neighborhoods are hiring private security and in | some cases threatening tax revolt | babyshake wrote: | In The Wire, this is called juking the stats. | 908B64B197 wrote: | You can do the same thing in education by closing down | magnets schools and lowering the bar for everyone... | rahimnathwani wrote: | You don't even have to close them. Just remove merit-based | admission, in the name of equity. | | Then, because many students won't be able to keep up, the | 'magnet' school will lower standards. | hncurious wrote: | I don't know if that was the intention or not, but that is | precisely the outcome of SF policies. | nitrogen wrote: | It seems to apply to traffic, too. Sabotage the road system | to prove that driving is terrible. A few extremely major | streets were basically off road driving for a year while I | was living there. Light timing is terrible at several | intersections, guaranteeing gridlock. Traffic cops get | stationed at the next intersection over, so nothing | changes. | | Mission accomplished: fewer cars on the road! But no money | coming in either. | BitwiseFool wrote: | I will never not share Goodhart's Law when the opportunity | arises: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a | good measure". You couple that with redefining what counts as | a 'crime', and bam, you get the situation SF is in right now. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law | eplanit wrote: | Exactly. Stop calling criminal activity "crimes", and then | the stats look great. And, the local SF media participates | and pushes the "crime is actually down" narrative: | https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco/stats- | sh... | AtlasBarfed wrote: | That is a bad idea. It leads to vigilantism, or even worse, | local organized crime steps in with attendant protectionism | racketeering. | | With the American System each year failing a larger and | larger percentage of the population, while the upper elites | continue to hoard wealth and starve the government, then it | makes more and more poor people turn to illegal means to make | money. | | Much like drug gangs in the inner city. However this will | also turn into the nasty spiral of gang-controlled | neighborhoods chasing out legit economic activity and | becoming even more poor. | | What we need is a decent civil society. But America is an | oligarchy and they've figured out how to use social media to | block any meaningful populist progressive reform by | organizing a sufficient opposition with astroturfing and fake | news. | floren wrote: | Yep, but if the police aren't going to do anything I find | it hard to blame the people in SF Chinatown who started | doing their own patrols: | https://www.sfchronicle.com/local/article/S-F-Chinatown- | patr... | dantheman wrote: | Do you think the government is starved? At what level of | spending would it not be starved? | jokethrowaway wrote: | The government is incompetent at protecting people. Call | the police and you'll see how it goes. And this is | happening while the government is spending 13B per year. I | wonder, where does the money go, if basic services are not | provided? | | I'd rather spend my money on a network of competing private | protection companies if I didn't have to pay taxes for the | police. Once the system is in place you can create all sort | of charity based options - or tax funded, if you like the | idea of forcefully stealing money from citizens' profit - | to grant protection to those who can't afford it. | floren wrote: | > I'd rather spend my money on a network of competing | private protection companies if I didn't have to pay | taxes for the police. | | I'd prefer to fix the cops rather than sign up for a | MetaCops subscription in my burbclave. | tyoma wrote: | The felony theft limit for Texas is $2,500, but their retail | establishments do not report massive shoplifting sprees. | Clearly there is more than misdemeanor/felony classification at | work here. | Workaccount2 wrote: | I'm pretty sure in CA it's that police do not respond to | calls for anything less than felony theft. | | So it creates a situation where you can walk in the store, | grab what you want, and then walk out with out having the | police called or anyone legally allowed to stop you. | sneak wrote: | "They were robbing the store, and I think one of them had a | machine gun!" | keeganpoppen wrote: | "i think they had some counterfeit $100 bills as well" | ceejayoz wrote: | > So it creates a situation where you can walk in the | store, grab what you want, and then walk out with out | having the police called or anyone legally allowed to stop | you. | | Walmart and Target, among others, reportedly monitor small | thefts and let you get up to the felony threshold over | multiple incidents before swooping in. | everybodyknows wrote: | An option not available to small businesses, as the | shoplifters have no doubt already learned. Another hidden | tilting of the playing field against small business. | hpkuarg wrote: | Yes, exactly. | ErikVandeWater wrote: | My guess is it's the same situation as Seattle; Prosecutors | in California refuse to prosecute these cases, meaning the | cops refuse to waste time trying to apprehend them. | | Here's an excellent clip about a famous criminal living free | in Seattle that happily expounds on his illegal activity: | https://youtu.be/bpAi70WWBlw?t=868 | crazy_horse wrote: | There are plenty of things about my state that get hated on | all the time, and deservingly so, but I'll never get how | the West Coast is happy driving productive people away and | coddling those that have no intention other than to fuck | over society. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _how the West Coast is happy driving productive people_ | | The evidence for this happening in economically- | meaningful numbers is scarce. What we _do_ see happening | is those productive people disengaging from that broken | society--civically, physically and emotionally. | nitrogen wrote: | _The evidence for this happening in economically- | meaningful numbers is scarce._ | | It doesn't take numbers meaningful to California to have | a meaningful effect on other states, where housing costs | are massively skyrocketing due to an influx of new | residents. | lotsofpulp wrote: | What does that have to do with crime? Could be people | just getting priced out. Land in the western US is still | more expensive and still getting more expensive than | elsewhere, clearly it is in demand even more than it is | not in demand. | rconti wrote: | I grew up in Washington, where people were whining about | Californians moving there and driving up property prices | since at least the 80s, but I'm sure long before. | | This doesn't prove someone's opinion that criminals are | being coddled and productive people are being driven | away. | crazy_horse wrote: | I mean about a decade ago I would have loved to live on | the West Coast. I'm sure I'm no great loss to you but | there are a lot of people that you just will never get. | Not to mention, compared to a decade ago, the cities in | my home state are starting to adopt these policies. | | I don't see how not prosecuting repeated offenders is not | coddling, as pointed out, the guy ended up murdering. | There's very much a cultural difference. | Cd00d wrote: | I grew up in Colorado, and complaints about housing costs | and traffic increases due to the influx of Californians | has been a constant since the 1970s. At least. | | I'm going posit that it's perception more than any actual | changes due to _fleeing 'fornians_. | a9h74j wrote: | Could be, but one hears of a multiplying effect: numbers | of households moving from California _times_ the absolute | housing price differences, in terms of money flowing into | local housing markets. | amznthrwaway wrote: | It's a common right-wing narrative that has literally | nothing to do with the data. It's just a thing that | right-wingers repeat at all times, regardless of the | data. | | HN is a site for right-wing extremists, so the nonsense | is particularly prevalent here. | codezero wrote: | Prices are rising in California too, so an exodus can't | be the explanation, probably inflation and investors | driving prices up? | [deleted] | ahepp wrote: | This guy went on to kill is girlfriend then (possibly | accidentally) himself. | https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/too-much- | jai... | keeganpoppen wrote: | wow, that article is actually a really interesting take | on the whole situation, and how there are no easy answers | (both in this case and, i suspect, in many others (in sf | and beyond)). these sorts of tragedies really highlight | the need for a society-wide rethink on how to balance | freedom/liberty with the ticking time bomb of negative | externalities that certain, highly-justice-system- | involved (especially when serious drug abuse issues are | in play) offenders represent. at what point is someone | "broken" enough from the pov of the rest of society that | the humane solution necessitates a more interventionist | approach? (not that forcible commission is at all a | panacea, or even necessarily a viable/effective approach, | of course). i think everyone would agree that letting | these sorts of problems fester until they get bad enough | that we can justify locking them up and throwing away the | key is not a good solution for anyone. | bko wrote: | That's a good point. I don't think the felony theft limit is | the only consideration the deters organized theft. One | obvious difference between Texas and Bay Area is Texas has a | lot of guns. | | > In TX can You Legally Shoot & Kill a Shoplifter? The short | answer is...not unless they somehow injure you in the process | of committing the theft, making it a robbery. "During the | process of committing the theft" would include while trying | to escape with the property... One thing that is UNIQUE to | Texas is the ability to use deadly force to protect property, | even if you are not in fear for your life. | | Even though I doubt CVS security guards are trained the shoot | shoplifters, the preception that this is a possibility would | deter low level criminals tasked with shoplifting | | http://legas.legrandelaw.com/criminal-justice/in-tx-can- | you-... | pjc50 wrote: | And what happens if you check the receipt on the body and | find out that the item wasn't stolen? How many years do you | face for murdering a customer? | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | I can point to where firearms have stopped shoplifting | crimes. | | Can you point to where your scenario has happened? | | Because I'm all for hypotheticals, so long as we admit | the rarity and precedent before saying there is a | problem. | Hizonner wrote: | Difficulty: It would take maybe, shall we say, ten | thousand of your "firearms stopping shoplifting" cases to | offset even ONE "innocent person getting shot" case. | [deleted] | PaulHoule wrote: | I grew up in NH which is a gun-happy state. | | My mom worked at Macy's and reported endless problems with | organized shoplifting in the 1980's and 1990's. One time a | whole family came into the Men's clothing department after | her shift, the dad kept the clerk distracted, the mom and | the kids took a few racks of suits and loaded them into | their car. | | She said that the security guards were loathe to use force | on anyone because Macy's could get sued; that didn't stop | shoplifters from running over a security guard in the | parking lot. | | I worked at a supermarket where the security was entirely | undercover (probably because they were more afraid of us | stealing than the customers) and I knew nothing about the | security until the day I saw a massively overweight woman | tackle a man who was leaving the store. | | I read this book | | https://www.amazon.com/Black-Mafia-Ethnic-Succession- | Organiz... | | which describes similar organized theft organizations | working in the 1970s, how the goods were fenced, etc. | paulpauper wrote: | The 70s 80s and early 90s was the golden age of crime. | Short sentences, much more lenient recidivism laws, poor | security, a culture that really didn't care that much, no | digitsliazation and no tech to easy track stolen goods or | id suspects, no smartphones . Multiple types of crimes | thrived in that era: bank robbery, drug | dealing/distribution, shoplifting, auto theft, and so on. | It was pretty bad, even worse than now. The noticeable | decline of crime since the 90s according to steven pinker | seems to confirm this. | [deleted] | conductr wrote: | > Even though I doubt CVS security guards are trained the | shoot shoplifters, the preception that this is a | possibility would deter low level criminals tasked with | shoplifting | | I've never once seen a security guard in a Texas CVS. It | actually sounds preposterous to me. Charging $3 for a 20oz | soda is the real crime. | nonameiguess wrote: | These comments are ridiculous. Have any of you people | saying these things ever actually lived in Texas? Minimum | wage chain store employees are not carrying guns. I would | discourage you from trying to rob someone's actual house, | sure. My wife once called me home to say she thought | someone was in the house, and I cleared every single room | with an AR-15, and you can believe I would have shot an | intruder without a second thought. But a convenience store? | No one is taking it personally enough to shoot you for | stealing corporate property. If anything, the employees are | probably the people most likely to be doing the stealing. | jcims wrote: | I think CA is an outlier. Super lax enforcement + huge | population just puts up big numbers. | valdiorn wrote: | but in Texas, how likely is the staff or the store owner to | be armed, and actually confront you? No way that would happen | in California. | | I keep thinking of this event that happened to me in the UK, | where laws are equally useless at preventing theft, and staff | are just powerless to do anything about it. I chased down a | shoplifter. I cornered him in an alley. He stopped, looked at | me, and this brief conversation took place. (and nobody ever | believes me, but I don't care; this really did happen) | | Him: What are you doing? | | Me: I'm chasing you | | Him: why? | | Me: Because you're a fucking thief! | | Him: (confused)...nobody's ever done that before. | | Me: (shocked) ... well, I AM, so fucking run! | | He dropped the bag (which contained mostly expensive meat and | cheese and some other expensive-ish items - apparently really | common theft targets) - and ran off. I took the bag back to | the store. | | Now, I didn't give a shit about a 100 pound loss to Tesco, | but if we've completely given up on the rule of law, I'm not | sure that's a society I'm happy to live in. | am_lu wrote: | Londoner here, true for big shops and supermarkets, off- | licenses and corner shops will be equipped with a baseball | bat behind the counter. Watched them dragging low-life | thiefs to the back stores to be dealt with. | ChefboyOG wrote: | ...what? The average Texan, as it turns out, isn't | literally Wyatt Earp. It would be shocking if a random Best | Buy manager stopped a shoplifter with a firearm--not to | mention probably in violation of Best Buy's policies for | handling shoplifting. | | The average cashier's ability to administer lethal force is | probably not a major influence on the prevalence of | shoplifting in Texas. | [deleted] | MisterBastahrd wrote: | Convenience store, pawn shop, or other stores in low income | areas? Maybe. | | The ones these people are hitting? Not a snowball's chance | in hell. An individual could walk out with 10 baskets full | of medicine and still not be worth the trouble to pull a | gun for all the legal headaches that will bring. | blacksmith_tb wrote: | Likely Tesco tossed them right in the bin, however. I think | it's overstating the case to claim that people robbing | shops (especially big chains) is an indication that "we've | completely given up on the rule of law" - at least, I find | it unlikely that your erstwhile (if gormless) thief, | emboldened by his huge haul of free meat and cheese, would | choose next time to relieve you of your wallet. Robbing | people is a much riskier game, even in a civilised (read | "non-firearm-carrying") place like the UK. | bluedino wrote: | >> but in Texas, how likely is the staff or the store owner | to be armed, and actually confront you? | | At a CVS? Not likely at all. | kook_throwaway wrote: | Why not? Plenty of folks from all walks of life down | there get their CCW. | alamortsubite wrote: | So given the opportunity, Texan bystanders with guns | would shoot unarmed shoplifters? | pandemicsyn wrote: | Nah, a big section of the class you take to get your LTC | (we don't have a CCW) covers just how screwed you would | be if you did so. | | ...but...theres dumb people everywhere, so when you | decide to shop lift in Texas the risk profile is | certainly different than it is in CA. | alamortsubite wrote: | "There's dumb people everywhere, so when you shoplift in | Texas" sounds a lot like like "Texan bystanders would | shoot shoplifters." | kook_throwaway wrote: | Why on earth would you jump straight to that conclusion? | Even if the firearm was drawn, which is a huge if | assuming the carrier was attacked, almost all defensive | gun uses end before a shot is fired. | | Someone carrying a firearm should be more willing to | nonviolently confront a thief than someone that's | unarmed. | | https://reason.com/2018/04/20/cdc-provides-more-evidence- | tha... | sfasf wrote: | In a fairly liberal area of PA I saw a manager of a | Walgreens very aggressively (not physically) confront a | shoplifter and yell out to never come to the store again. | The punk tried to respond, but ultimately cowered to the | anger of the manager. | | In TX they'd be more intimidating, I'm sure. Unless | corporate bans guns. | unexpected wrote: | sorry, but in Texas, big box retailers do not use armed | staff. Target, Wal Mart, CVS, Walgreens, Best Buy - I | have never, ever seen a worker with a gun. | | As a life-long Texan, this sounds ridiculous to me. A Wal | Mart employee is more intimidating, simply because | they're Texan? | | This is not the 1850's. | [deleted] | cdot2 wrote: | You probably walk by people carrying guns every day and | never notice | jdavis703 wrote: | Even in the ultra-liberal Bay Area my Walgreens, Target | and Best Buy employ armed security. I find it doubtful | that Texas of all places doesn't have armed security. | | (Oddly I've only seen unarmed, tired looking security in | CVS. Perhaps they're too cheap to pay for armed gaurds.) | kook_throwaway wrote: | > box retailers do not use armed staff. Target, Wal Mart, | CVS, Walgreens, Best Buy - I have never, ever seen a | worker with a gun | | It wouldn't be the corporation arming the staff, it would | be the staff arming themselves via a CCW/CHL. The first | letter states 'concealed', so by definition you shouldn't | see it. | | >A Wal Mart employee is more intimidating, simply because | they're Texan | | Its less about any individual employee, and more about | the general culture and nature of crime in the two areas. | If I were a criminal in Texas, I would undoubtedly prefer | crimes with less chance of confrontation. | [deleted] | amznthrwaway wrote: | There is absolutely no way that corporate would allow | employees shooting people to defend property. | | The resulting lawsuits would be orders of magnitude more | expensive for the company than the lost goods, and "there | was a shooting at walgreens" is not a headline that | Walgreens wants to see. | ChefboyOG wrote: | Texas is a big place, and as far as I'm aware, doesn't | make it a policy to train individuals to be vigilantes. | | If your anecdote proves anything, it is the relative | safety of that liberal area of PA. The fact that a | manager of a Walgreens was comfortable confronting a | criminal without real consequences speaks to the level of | danger they were in. | | If you've spent time in any rougher areas of Texas (I | have), you'd agree that physically confronting a criminal | over petty theft, as a store manager, carries a huge risk | of violent escalation--something you'd probably want to | avoid in a city with a higher murder rate. | nonameiguess wrote: | All of the downtown CVS locations in Dallas don't even have | checkout employees. It's automated self-checkout. You can | just walk out of the store if you want to. Nobody is going | to shoot you. Whoever owns CVS doesn't live anywhere near | the stores. | [deleted] | anigbrowl wrote: | I totally believe you, but I don't think that's laudable. | | It's one thing to go after someone who steals from _you_ or | some other individual, but appointing yourself the | vigilante protector of the grocer class is not about | defending society, it 's about your personal drives. | | The food you returned almost certainly wound up in the | trash (stores have no way of knowing you're not a weirdo | who contaminates food for kicks), and the cost of | administering 'rescued product' is more than that of just | writing off the loss as a business expense, which you'd | better believe they already budget around. | pjc50 wrote: | Friend of mine got in the local paper for retrieving his | laptop from a grab-and-run, by being a regular competitive | runner and dramatically outrunning the guy. | | Can't imagine anyone doing that for Tesco, though. | Especially unpaid. | nuclearnice1 wrote: | I love a good foot chase! | | Given the sentiments of your last paragraph, why did you | choose to send the criminal away and return Tesco's stolen | beef? | ryandrake wrote: | I don't understand putting your personal safety at risk | (who knows if he had a knife or something) over PS100 of | goods belonging to a PS20B company. It's not like he | stole your meat and cheese as you were shopping. Nobody | is going to miss that cheese. Nobody is going to get | fired over it. It's really not that important. | nuclearnice1 wrote: | You mention the meat and cheese, but the comment | explicitly disavows that motive. | | P: I chased this guy for law and justice, not meat and | cheese. | | Q: why did you chase for meat cheese? | ryandrake wrote: | He _said_ he chased the guy out of principle, but if that | were true, it follows that he 'd do the same thing if the | guy stole a pack of gum, which is even more insane. Even | the police won't chase someone down for stealing such | small amounts. He's not the police, he's not the owner of | the store, he (presumably) don't even work there. He has | no skin in that game whatsoever. | | The store has already accounted for shoplifting and | shrinkage in their budget, and any steps they might take | to combat it will be systemic via policy and by working | with law enforcement to bust major groups (the subject of | the actual article) and not one-off foot-chases. | | You might argue that a store will charge higher prices in | an environment with shoplifting than without, but how | much does that really boil down to in terms of the | customer's final bill? Bread becomes PS0.02 more | expensive in a store that has accounted for shoplifting? | Does anyone care? | | Finally, there is almost no secondary market for food, | so, in OP's case, the guy was likely stealing in order to | eat, and not to just fence the goods for money. | incone123 wrote: | It's pretty normal to be offered freshly stolen meat and | other high value food in pubs, in poor neighborhoods. | It's happened to me lots of times. There very much is a | secondary food market. | ctoth wrote: | > You might argue that a store will charge higher prices | in an environment with shoplifting than without, but how | much does that really boil down to in terms of the | customer's final bill? | | This is clearly not about meat and cheese. This is about | stamping out the attitude that some people have that | allow them to walk into a store and just ...take stuff. | This time it was from a large company. Next time it's | from your house or car. What is the cost of living in a | civil society where people don't routinely steal? | Apparently, in a world where police are unwilling to | respond it's acts like this. Thank you OP. | sfasf wrote: | Well, the principle of the matter for one and some have | personal courage. | | Also, what you propose radically changes society for the | worse. If Tesco can't assume a high trust environment to | sell their goods, they will implement policies to protect | themselves that are more expensive/less convenient for | everyone. Thomas Sowell has written extensively about | this. | chrischen wrote: | Agree that OP doesn't have a responsibility to defend | Tesco from crime, however disagree that it doesn't | matter. It's logical fallacy to say that crimes small | enough don't matter. By that definition a criminal that | is robs billions of people for mere pennies wouldn't | matter. You have to look at the class of crimes. So if | petty crimes are significant, then as a class of crimes | it matters. | Gunax wrote: | > Retail investigators blame changes in sentencing laws in some | states for an uptick in thefts. In California, a 2014 law | downgraded the theft of less than $950 worth of goods to a | misdemeanor from a felony. Target recently reduced its operating | hours in five San Francisco stores, citing rising thefts. | | I think this is an example of conflating two classes of crime. | There are effectively two classes of shoplifter: the professional | and the desperate amateur. The activists who wanted the | sentencing reduction probably did not have organised gangs in | mind. But the gangs are taking advantage of the light rules. | | This is something we miss a lot in discussions of crime. For | instance, laws against possession exist because of the crimes | associated with drug use. People who use drugs who wouldn't | otherwise cause any crime are a sort of collateral damage of | these rules. | | It's often remarked how drug laws are disproportionately enforced | against the poor, but I have always regarded that as a feature | and not a mistake (as awful as that is for equality under the | law). No one really cares about the banker snorting coke because | he isn't robbing gas stations to get his fix. | throwaway894345 wrote: | > But the gangs are taking advantage of the light rules. | | Not only that, but it incentivizes amateurs to _become_ | professionals. Theft becomes a viable career under lax laws. | And crime begets poverty, so I suspect this creates quite a few | more "desperate amateurs" some of whom will become | professionals and so on. | AlexandrB wrote: | > And crime begets poverty... | | Doesn't this get cause and effect backwards? You have no job, | no prospects, so you turn to crime. How does the reverse | narrative work? | throwaway894345 wrote: | It's a cycle. Crime drives away money and poor people are | more likely to resort to crime. It's super difficult to | reverse this cycle, which is why we ought to keep a clear | berth. | josephcsible wrote: | The store can't afford to stay open because of all the | crime, so it closes and lays off all its employees, who are | now all in poverty. | mywittyname wrote: | Also, isn't seven years a pretty big lag time between cause and | effect here? | | Brazen thefts like this have been happening for years around | the country. I used to work retail (loong ago) and the store | would actively let people walk out with expensive merchandise | and do nothing to stop them. So I really doubt the change in | law has anything to do with this. | | More like 2020 was fucking miserable and goods shortages & | unemployment drove people to take up lucrative careers in | organized theft. | swayvil wrote: | UBI might fix this. Criminals, as a rule, aren't doing it for | lulz. | | It's like the free speech problem. Don't combat the bad by trying | to stamp it out. Combat it by providing a better option. | keeganpoppen wrote: | "as a rule"? | president wrote: | Never understood the point of UBI. We have food stamps, | welfare, and a wide assortment of government safety net | programs. UBI would just be all those things on steroids. Why | would hard working people want their tax money going to others | who aren't contributing? The whole concept would lead to mass | dependency on the government, which is the worst thing that | could happen. | frockington1 wrote: | Wouldn't people just collect UBI AND steal? The article | explicitly mentions that most of the people doing this are also | receiving state and feral unemployment benefits | swayvil wrote: | If UBI (or feral benefits) fulfilled their needs then I doubt | that they would resort to crime. | missedthecue wrote: | For some reason, I just don't think the people described in | this article are moving millions and millions of dollars of | makeup and over-the-counter drugs every year in order to | keep their basic needs met. | luckylion wrote: | > Wouldn't people just collect UBI AND steal? | | Yes, they would. Great example: Turkish + Arab Clans in | Germany. They usually collect benefits, aren't asked to work, | and are heavily involved into crime. | ZeroGravitas wrote: | This appears to be part of a long running PR campaign by large | corporations that are happy to lock up poor, mentally-ill and | drug-addicted people at the taxpayers expense if it lets them | fear monger, while at the same time stealing from their own | employees. | | https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/... | | https://www.npr.org/2020/10/16/923844907/when-shoplifting-is... | | https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/San-Fr... | | There's some telltale signs that people are trying to swap | between thefts and violent organized theft in a dishonest way, | trying to conflate the two. | | They're also using it as cover for closing stores that they were | going to close anyway. | black_13 wrote: | Yes i have seen the articles to much if the same content in | different places to be spontaneous | thatguy0900 wrote: | Let's suppose there is a real problem with shoplifters | effectively being immune from punishment, would you expe t | there to be little news coverage? | nitwit005 wrote: | You believe that retailers secretly hate the mentally ill and | drug addicts, and are engaging in a decades long nation wide | secret conspiracy to get them thrown in prison? | | I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that they probably | just don't like people stealing from them. | [deleted] | president wrote: | I don't care if they're rich, poor, mentally-ill, or drug- | addicted - if someone breaks the law, there needs to be some | sort of punishment. Letting them off is just enabling repeat | offense and signaling to other criminals that this behavior is | tolerated as we have seen. | [deleted] | AlexandrB wrote: | I think I realized that America is lawless when no one who | matters went to jail for torture during the Afghanistan/Iraq | wars. Shoplifting is a drop in the bucket compared to that, | so I have no sympathy for "tough on crime" rhetoric anymore. | wes-k wrote: | s/punishment/response | rossdavidh wrote: | Why would they need "cover for closing stores that they were | going to close anyway"? They can basically just close them, and | no one's going to stop them or cause a problem. Why would they | need "cover"? | black_13 wrote: | Ive gone to many retail stores at night an they have almost no | one working there they are victims of efficiency and the people | working there dont care about the store they are not paid enought | to care ... if your making 7 dollars an hour in a retail store in | Boston you by default hate your employer | victorbstan wrote: | What's the point of police or security guards? | josephcsible wrote: | When the prosecutor refuses to prosecute anyone, there's no | point at all. | bluedino wrote: | I worked at a mall in the 90's in two different stores. One was a | clothing store, and 'home shoppers' made up the majority of the | thefts. | | The way it works, is you 'place an order', and someone from the | theft ring steals what you want, and in a few days you get your | items at a discount from the 'home shopper'. | | I remember my dad would buy some random clothing items from a | friend of a friend who had things in the trunk of his car. I | never thought much of it. | | When I worked at JC Penny I then saw how it worked. You'd have | random individual shoplifters (they'd leave all the tags and | stuff from the clothes in the bathrooms or dressing rooms), or | you'd have multiple shoplifters come in at once, fill their carts | and then dash out the door, getaway car waiting for them. | | Store security couldn't do much, if you tackled the people you'd | get fired, so the best defense was to jam up the automatic doors | with empty shopping carts, that way they could only leave with | what they could fit in their hands. | | It wasn't much different at the electronics store I worked at | afterward. PC add-in cards would end up missing, empty boxes | found in the appliances on the other end of the store, sliced | open so they could be fished out the bottom. There go the new | $300 3Dfx cards... | | And the organized shoplifters came in at night, just before | close. You'd have 5-6 people come in, and all head for the CD | aisle. We'd page for customer assistance, and anyone still | working in the store would head over. They'd fill their coats | with CD's and again run out the door, getaway car waiting. | | All you can do is get them on camera, record the description or | license plate of the car, and let the police know, and let the | other stores know. Our internal email system had a ongoing thread | of the shoplifters they'd seen lately, because they would hit | every store in the state. | Proven wrote: | They could simply donate to Republican election campaigns. | steve76 wrote: | Plagues and barbarity go hand in hand. A few become obscure and | cure disease and advance humanity. Everyone punching each other | and stealing and killing each other miss out on it and die. | hamburgerwah wrote: | In my experience retailers are lying in a bed of their own | making. They have had more than a decade to implement RFID based | UPCs and have steadfastly resisted it at every turn because of | the few pennies it adds in the supply chain. While not perfect | RFID allows for much better security controls that the status | quo. Instead they continue to underinvest in adequate technology | skills and will just rely on shady third party, privacy | destroying, false positive generating facial recognition. | N1H1L wrote: | I thought that was EBay? | paulpauper wrote: | I would hope so or expect so. How is this news surprising. | legitster wrote: | A friend of mine is a manager at a Safeway. He says a typical | store might lose six figures worth of product in a year. In a bad | neighborhood it's not uncommon to lose over a million dollars a | year. | | They hire security personnel, but people figure out that a) even | when security catches you, they are not allowed to restrain you | and b) the police do not respond to shoplifters (in certain | jurisdictions they are not allowed to. | | The stores are responsible for the cost of missing inventory - | they credit it back to the manufacturers. Stores already run | tight margins, so this cost ends up getting paid by reduced | headcount at stores (except for security, if it's bad enough) and | directly in prices. | | And this is in the grocery space, where there's very little | secondary market for the stolen goods! | joezydeco wrote: | Some goods serve as an alternative currency, like bottles of | Tide laundry detergent: | | https://nymag.com/news/features/tide-detergent-drugs-2013-1/... | legitster wrote: | My wife introduced me to the world of underground baby | formula. It's frankly shocking how many people she knows who | make money off of it (either shoplifting, Medicaid fraud, or | as a way of converting WIC into cash). | realitygrill wrote: | I would love to hear more about this, particularly the | Medicaid fraud angle. | carstenhag wrote: | Why are they not allowed to restrain a shoplifter? In Germany, | that's covered by the "anyone's" right: if you see someone | commit a crime, you can detain/restrain them until the police | arrives. Some restrictions apply, like for example having to | watch the crime yourself etc but for shop security staff it's | enough rights | | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festnahme#Jedermann-Festnahme | bpodgursky wrote: | They're allowed in a legal sense, but the store often orders | security not to physically intervene because of the potential | legal liability if either party is injured. | DavidPeiffer wrote: | It's not necessarily that they can't legally do so, but it's | against the policy of every single store. If you do so as an | employee, you will most likely get fired. No amount of | merchandise is worth risking an employees life. Healthcare is | a mess over here, but we do generally have that part right. | | Restraining a shoplifter could lead to liability issues for | the employer. For example, if the shoplifter injures the | employee, there's a workplace injury that goes on the OSHA | record, you have an employee who is out for some amount of | time, it could increase insurance rates, and it could lead to | the employee getting shot if the shoplifter were particularly | violent. | | Additionally, if the shoplifter gets injured, they may sue | the store for the injury they sustained. | | Most of the US does allow a citizens arrest to be performed. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen%27s_arrest | rot13xor wrote: | Eventually all stores are going to require a membership or | deposit before letting you enter, like Costco. | legitster wrote: | I mean, you can just run into a Costco, grab something, and | run out. No one can stop you. | | In Costco's favor, they don't have a lot of valuable things | that you can just walk with that aren't just a cardboard | voucher. | ericcholis wrote: | Slightly adjacent, fighting credit card disputes feels the same | way. A company can prove without a doubt that it's a legitimate | charge, only to have the case go to pre-arbitration; which in | many cases is too costly to fight without certainty of winning. | 908B64B197 wrote: | > In a bad neighborhood it's not uncommon to lose over a | million dollars a year. | | Then the store closes, then you get a food desert. | zionic wrote: | Followed by a smug article decrying the entire situation from | some smug blogger. | 13of40 wrote: | I noticed my local Home Depot has done away with the security | tag scanners at the front of the store, apparently in favor of | a cluster of new cameras above all the exits. I wonder if we're | headed for just having an AI watch everyone all the time in the | store like the automatic-purchase grocery stores Amazon was | setting up. Either that or they discovered that it was better | for their bottom line to put real security around the power | tools than bust people for stealing trivial things. | sjg007 wrote: | Ultimately high value things will get secured behind a clerk | where you take a picture card of what you want to them. | | Stores will use cameras and AI to build a comprehensive case | against someone or group and then notify the police. That | will be enough for a warrant etc... | | Probably a startup or two in this space. I am sure home depot | or CVS will invest in your series A. | DavidPeiffer wrote: | From a month ago, they're working on some new methods where | power tools won't work until they're activated at the | register. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28035458 | matrix wrote: | Amazon's co-mingling of inventory facilitated large-scale theft | by enabling stolen goods to be sold along-side legitimately | sourced items. One has to wonder: at what point does Amazon's | reluctance to improve supply-chain integrity venture into the | territory of aiding and abetting crime? | PaulHoule wrote: | "Pawnshop" is the wrong word. A "Pawnshop" takes your goods for | collateral and loans you money. A "fence" is somebody who helps | thieves sell stolen goods. | | A pawnshop might be a front for fencing, but Amazon doesn't | function as a pawnshop at all. | | [This comment was a reaction to the title of this post, which was | fortunately changed.] | andy_ppp wrote: | I'm actually surprised no-one has set up an online pawnshop, | Klarna meets eBay. | 55555 wrote: | Shipping costs make this probably a bad idea. | Cerium wrote: | You would have to do it as a social marketplace. You could | post the items you want to pawn and local independent | 'shops' could offer the item. Essentially, a reverse | Craigslist with pawn dynamics backed by eBay style profiles | and feedback. | quakeguy wrote: | That sounds like a good idea tbh. | wil421 wrote: | It would be way too easy to scam them. Pawnshops need to | validate the quality of the item and determine if it's legit. | Most Pawnshops will also sell on ebay. | andy_ppp wrote: | This is exactly what people said about eBay, no? | wil421 wrote: | How can I put this. The clientele who are using eBay is | not quite the same as Pawnshops. I've seen someone get | off a city bus with a massive TV heading into the | pawnshop. I doubt the person owned the TV and the | pawnshop was known as a fence. It had a walk up after | hours window that was open late. Although it's much more | common for homeless people to have phones these days than | when I saw this occur. Junkies will find junk that's for | sure. | [deleted] | rtkwe wrote: | They're not great places to take stolen goods either, at least | not generically, for anything with a serial number or distinct | characteristics. Every item that get's pawned or sold in a | store goes into a searchable database like LeadsOnline [0]. My | family owns a number of pawn shops and we got a very low number | of stolen items, the most common was someone stealing from | family. | | [0] https://www.leadsonline.com/main/index.php | lotsofpulp wrote: | I thought pawn shops were places you could sell random stuff | and buy random stuff, never knew they loaned money! | betwixthewires wrote: | It's the oldest form of credit, the collateralized loan. | astrea wrote: | When you "pawn" an item, you get a short term loan with your | item as collateral. If you don't pay back the loan they sell | your item. | wccrawford wrote: | With interest, of course. | ninetenfour wrote: | 100%. Pawnshops are basically high interest collateral loan | shops. This is saying that Amazon is a fencing operation. But | then again this has been a major use for eBay and similar as | well. | chrisxcross wrote: | https://archive.is/s4S8a | [deleted] | JackFr wrote: | Mods, please correct headline. | | This hardly a story about Amazon. It's a story of how Northern | California's choice not to prosecute theft has resulted in a | massive increase in criminal activity. | | That CVS has to privately hire security in the face of $10 | million/year of goods being brazenly looted out of its stores has | little to do with any Amazon policy and more to do with the | policies adopted by local district attorneys. | adolph wrote: | Large numbers without a comparison are difficult to understand. | Is 10M a large or small number in this context? | | CA has 1,180 CVS pharmacies. [0] Northern CA has 40% of CA pop. | [1] Assuming regular distribution of CVSes in CA, there are 472 | in Northern CA. 10M is 21k/store. Is that a lot? Not certain. | | 0. https://www.scrapehero.com/largest-pharmacies-in-the-us/ | | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_California | busyant wrote: | There's reasonable evidence that this is how the Sicilian Mafia | started: lack of effective state enforcement of laws and | property rights... Creating a situation where private security | forces arise, offering protection from gangs of thieves and | perhaps protection from the security force itself. Obviously, | this is not what cvs is doing, but lack of effective law | enforcement can lead to unusual and unexpected "solutions." | mint2 wrote: | How much is it DAs vs cops just not wanting to do their job to | prove what they said would happen is true? | | Cops don't always arrest based on the law, but what they feel | like doing. See Oregon where they decided not to police proud | boy protests and tend to arrest anti-white supremacist type | protestors much more. | | How much is it the cops found they can prove their own point? | If I make a bet that I'll get last in a race, I'll run slower. | If one claims some policy will slow them down and They don't | actually have an incentive to win, Then there's a chance | they'll slow down to be right so people will do what They say | in the future. | | What incentive do cops have to arrest or charge theft when cops | keep saying it's CA laws that are causing thefts to rise? They | can make themselves seem right by not arresting people. | google234123 wrote: | The DAs literally don't prosecute people. It's not the cops. | sabarn01 wrote: | My leo friends have said its morally wrong to arrest someone | for something they won't be prosecuted for. | dls2016 wrote: | Wake me when wage theft is prosecuted anywhere near as | seriously as shoplifting. Both have been estimated to cost the | economy around $40 billion per year in the US. (Simply search | "shoplifting cost in us" or "wage theft cost in us" and find | your favorite estimate. They're surprisingly close.) | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _Wake me when wage theft is prosecuted anywhere near as | seriously as shoplifting_ | | Given the article is about the effects of not prosecuting | shoplifting, time to wake up? | axus wrote: | I wonder if the savings to society for police/court time is | worth the increased cost of goods from shops paying for their | own security? Will this become another barrier to entry for | small businesses? | [deleted] | ZeroGravitas wrote: | Can you link to some sources on this? | | edit: I'd seen this mentioned recently, but hadn't realised it | was a long running culture war thing so it had already been | discredited by research years ago: | | https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/... | nitrogen wrote: | That's 2018. Wr're here in 2021 watching videos of stores | being actively raided. | noasaservice wrote: | I've worked in retail before (walmart) as a 3rd shift | stocker, ages ago. | | Never once would I even consider saying anything to a | suspected thief. In fact, I walked away from at least 2 | times where I knew people were destroying the spider-alarms | on electronics in the pets aisle. It is not worth my | personal safety in saying anything, especially for someone | making $9/hr. | | Maybe that's the wrong approach. But it's not my stuff, its | not my role I was hired in as, and not worth any personal | injury I might receive. I will intentionally give a blind | eye to petty or professional retail theft. Let security | deal with it. | ZeroGravitas wrote: | Have you got any videos of statistical trends or other | evidence that what you believe is actually true? Or are we | just working from viral anecdata? | imgabe wrote: | Walgreens and Target and other retailers are shutting | down stores and changing the hours so they close earlier. | Presumably they're not doing that because they watched a | viral video. | ZeroGravitas wrote: | > According to federal data, adults with substance-abuse | disorders make up just 2.6 percent of the total | population but 72 percent of all jail inmates sentenced | for property crimes. Addicts are 29 times more likely to | commit property crimes than the average American. | Furthermore, as the Bureau of Justice Statistics found, | "[39 percent of jail inmates] held for property offenses | said they committed the crime for money for drugs"--the | most common single motivation for crime throughout the | justice system. | | In other news, the Sacklers got away with making Billions | from creatimg addicts. | lotsofpulp wrote: | The clickbait/bias just gets more and more brazen. | CrimsonRain wrote: | 100% this. | [deleted] | gryz wrote: | Could a setup like with Amazon Go stores help here? Let in only | customers with a verified account. | CameronNemo wrote: | Maybe. That would be the last place I shop, though. | josephcsible wrote: | The shoplifter gangs will just jump over the turnstiles. I | imagine any store impervious to this attack wouldn't meet fire | safety requirements. | AlexandrB wrote: | There's an irony to the top comment on an article about organized | shoplifting being a link to archive.is to get around the paywall. | Especially given all the "tough on crime" and "rule of law" talk | in the comments. | josephcsible wrote: | Reading the article doesn't make it disappear from the website. | If I went to a bookstore, read one of their books in the store, | then put it back on the shelf and left without buying anything, | would you consider that to be shoplifting too? | AlexandrB wrote: | No, obviously not. But if you scanned the book, put it on | archive.is and invited all the visitors to Hacker News to | read it I think that might be copyright infringement. IANAL | so setting the precise legality aside, in terms of economic | harm (which many here have brought up regarding shoplifting), | how is this different? | josephcsible wrote: | If I just told archive.is the title of a book, and they | went to get it and scanned it in and put it on their | website, _they_ might be guilty of copyright infringement, | but I don 't think _I_ would be. | aurizon wrote: | Back in the old days, you asked for items the clerk got them and | you paid. There was too much theft in the old days for open | shelves. Now we leave it open and trust - which has now been | massively abused has expanded to fill that void. The clerks were | labor intensive, but the similar robots to used in Amazon | warehouses could serve people at a screen, the order assembled, | paid and then handed to the client - much like online order and | deliver - but in person. These huge costs will force this. Small | stores will go to the old one at a time model service - most do | this with cigarettes and liquor. It is a fine tuning of the | retail chain that I feel will inexorable be forced upon us. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-03 23:01 UTC)