[HN Gopher] Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with... ___________________________________________________________________ Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis (2002) Author : ansaso Score : 78 points Date : 2021-09-05 12:58 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (TXT) w3m dump (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) | throwthere wrote: | As interesting as this is, it's kind of got my spidy-sense | tingling. How many non-significant outcomes did test and not | publish before seeing traffic accidents? The perfect dose- | dependence gives more credence (increasing odds ratio at | increasing titers), although the sample size is small. | Pyramus wrote: | Yes, the dose-response is the interesting bit, and strong | indication for causation. | | Not an expert so don't know how well we understand the | mechanism of action, which is crucial. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | The paper states high up that it's been well studied that | Toxoplasmosis infection increases reaction time - this study | was basically just showing that that laboratory-viewed metric | has real-world consequences. | | As far as mechanism of action, T. gondii infects both neurons | in the brain and glial cells. | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | You mean if I was TOXO free, I could be an even MORE aggressive | driver? Totally going to mainline some Ivermectin. | prvc wrote: | The case for devoting resources towards developing an efficient | cure is becoming clear. | splittingTimes wrote: | Stanford neuroendocrinology researcher Robert Sapolsky Explains | Toxoplasmosis on the Joe Rogan podcast. Utterly fascinating. | | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NroiGfNohPo | bmeski wrote: | So cat people can't drive well? We've always known this. | whateveracct wrote: | what exactly constitutes a "cat person" exactly? | | the dichotomy between "dog people" and "cat people" had always | been interesting and telling to me. | | dog people will go as far as blame you for their "reactive" dog | who can "tell when your nervous around him." | | not-cat people mostly don't like cats because..the cats are | "rude" to them? | | In a way, these are similar experiences. You are behaving in a | way the animal doesn't like, and the animal is reacting | negatively. | | With the dog, there isn't much you can easily do about a dog | who doesn't know you and feels threatened when you stand up. | You're dealing with a few steps removed from a beast in that | situation. | | But for cats, you can probably just be more cat-polite if you | actually want the cat to be nice to you. Same goes for people | haha | bmeski wrote: | I don't even know haha. All the cat people in my life are | vastly different drivers. The joke appeared instantly and I | had to pull the trigger. | gruez wrote: | >what exactly constitutes a "cat person" exactly? | | >the dichotomy between "dog people" and "cat people" had | always been interesting and telling to me. | | I think by "cat person" he meant less "I like cats", and more | "cat lady" | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxoplasmosis#Society_and_cult. | .. | eurasiantiger wrote: | > the dichotomy between "dog people" and "cat people" | | In my experience, there are many kinds of both. | | - cat/dog people who are primarily just animal lovers and | take in rescue cats/dogs | | - cat/dog people who primarily want to have a non-human | companion in their daily life | | - dog people who primarily want to use a dog to aid them in | some activity, e.g. hunting | | - cat/dog people who primarily want to show off their dog | with pride | | - cat/dog people who primarily want to breed cats/dogs for | sale to other enthusiasts | | - dog people who primarily enjoy dominating another species | and having them at their mercy | | - cat/dog people who are running a kitten/puppy mill for | profit | | - cat people who are themselves independent and value that | quality in cats | kodah wrote: | The joke to me seemed to be poking fun at correlation and | causation. | | In a literal sense, people get pets for different reasons. A | lot of people get cats because they're more independent where | dog owners cite "having a companion" because dogs have a | closer relationship to humans through domestication. | | Animals are still animals, domesticated or not. They'll get | fearful or angry based on correlation of past experience just | like you and I will. The only difference is that they can't | explain themselves like you and I can. Anecdotally, I know my | dog is terrified of fireworks, but I also know she's not gun- | shy. I also know she doesn't like full face masks (like | motorcycle helmets), and that she's ready to defend the house | if there's a knock at the door. All of which sound relatively | terrifying to the average person when she reacts to them, | however, when she is actually confronted with the person on | the other side of the door, the person behind the mask, or | seeing the fireworks that go "bang" she'll flop on her back | and ask for belly rubs. | petre wrote: | People who want an independent dog should get a Husky or a | Fox Terrier. | 11235813213455 wrote: | and people living in apartments could consider plants as | pets | kennywinker wrote: | I think you're going for a glib lil' fun quip, but that really | just sounds like sexism one-step-removed to me. The stereotype | of the cat lady, mixed in with the stereotype of women being | bad drivers. Unless there's some stereotype about men who like | cats I'm not aware of? | atatatat wrote: | Who was stereotyping? | jpxw wrote: | Thank god the joke police have arrived to ensure that nobody | is entertained inappropriately. Phew, that was a close one. | kennywinker wrote: | Serious question: if my reply hadn't been there when you | arrived would you have been entertained? If so - what was | entertaining about the comment | black_niggers wrote: | kill urself f@ggot | jpxw wrote: | It was a glib little quip, as you mentioned. That was the | entertaining part. | | Edit: I've just noticed a particularly vile and | undeserved comment in reply to you, and to some extent | feel responsibility, as it's part of a comment chain I | created. I hope the mods will take action and ban whoever | made this comment, although by the looks it's a burner | account. It's quite jarring to see something like that on | HN. | kodah wrote: | Use the flag feature. If enough people flag it the | comment disappears. That's what I did, downvote and flag | all comments that don't meet the guidelines for | participating in HN. | kennywinker wrote: | All good. It seems to be gone now, since I can't see it. | black_niggers wrote: | kill urself f@ggot | rkk3 wrote: | World class mental gymnastics to insert gender identity | politics into a conservation about pet ownership. | | > Unless there's some stereotype about men who like cats I'm | not aware of? | | Yes, there are plenty of stereotypes about "People who like | cats". | dgfitz wrote: | Sincerely, do you get tired of this train of thought? It's | exhausting for me to attempt to constantly think in this | paradigm. | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | It's common now for people actively seeking any opportunity | to be offended on behalf of someone else. | | There must be some odd entertainment factor to it that you | and I don't understand. | | I don't know what it's like to be so self-certain and | absolute that I would take on responsibility of social | internet police. | kennywinker wrote: | Not really "offended". I was actually more hoping I could | make the original author notice some internalized | misogyny. I appreciate when people point out when my | thinking is based in bad stereotypes and assumptions. I | was going for more of a bros-helping-bros kinda thing. | [deleted] | Freestyler_3 wrote: | Kind of stereotyping/assumptious to think that because | someone posts something about cat people that the person | is a man who actually means to say women cant drive. | [deleted] | SavantIdiot wrote: | > It's common now for people actively seeking any | opportunity to be offended on behalf of someone else. | | I never understood why people get so angry at other | people for showing solidarity, even if they aren't part | of the oppressed group. | | Why does it make you so mad? Seriously, I don't get it. | | Is it because no one stands up for you? | | Standing up for a minority group that you are not part of | is called being part of a community, it is literally what | solidarity is all about. I know that is hard for a lot of | people on HN to understand, this place is rife with | mythology of bootstraps & rugged individualism. | | By your insane logic, the only person who can stand up | for someone is that one person. Maybe that is what you | want? | | I'm just baffled by the anger. | kennywinker wrote: | Yes it's exhausting. Once you see the atmospheric misogyny | we're all soaking in, it's very hard to ignore tho. | | See also: https://www.theonion.com/woman-takes-short-half- | hour-break-f... | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Thanks for following up with that. I think linking an | onion article from seven years go definitely adds context | to your point of view. | kennywinker wrote: | Oh, sorry is the joke not funny because it's 7 years old? | Because I noticed that "women are bad drivers" jokes have | been around since the 1920s... | [deleted] | koheripbal wrote: | Im not sure this is the right website for you. | JohnJamesRambo wrote: | Now I need Progressive to pay for a round of pyrimethamine and | sulfadiazine for me. | rini17 wrote: | Latent toxoplasmosis is literally insidious, hidden inside body | fat cells where antibiotics won't reach and only occasionally | it gets out to infect more cells. So one round is not enough, | you have to take antibiotics for years until all the infected | cells die. | eurasiantiger wrote: | Hmm. I wonder if there is an antibiotic prodrug that would | mimic glucose enough for it to be recognised by beta cells, | get metabolised and release the antibiotic payload inside a | fat cell. | nerdponx wrote: | Is this accepted convention? | | It sounds a lot like the explanation for chronic Lyme disease | (except with nerve tissue and not fat cells), which is | apparently still quite controversial despite having lots of | anecdotal evidence to support it. | | Also if the parasite is hiding in your fat cells, does that | also mean that you can't detect it in a blood test? | rini17 wrote: | Hmm it is possible I confused it with chlamydia. In any | case, if it affects behavior, there should be some chemical | markers too. | mortenlarsen wrote: | I wonder what BAC would generate the same effect. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-05 23:01 UTC)