[HN Gopher] Public Comment on Inflation Measurement ___________________________________________________________________ Public Comment on Inflation Measurement Author : reedjosh Score : 26 points Date : 2021-09-08 21:26 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.shadowstats.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.shadowstats.com) | jjgreen wrote: | Modern calculations of inflation use the geometric mean of price | increases, while previously it was the arithmetic mean. The | reason is exactly the geometric-arithmetic mean inequality [1]. | This is the largest theft ever made, and no-one knows or wants to | know about it. | | [1] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequality_of_arithmetic_and_g... | sebmellen wrote: | > Your PHP installation appears to be missing the MySQL which is | required for WordPress. | | What a brave and stunning public comment! | only_as_i_fall wrote: | If the goal of cpi is to reflect what consumers feel the | inflation rate is regardless of what any consistent measurement | scheme says, the BLS could get rid of the pesky measurement | nonsense altogether just take an annual survey. Think of the cost | savings! | tacostakohashi wrote: | This website's subscription price has been unchanged at $175/year | or $89/six months since (at least) 2008. | | http://www.shadowstats.com/subscriptions | | https://web.archive.org/web/20080512223437/http://www.shadow... | iamdamian wrote: | Yes, any inflation measure is imperfect, but I'm not sure how it | could even theoretically be perfect given changing technology. | How do you properly measure substitution effects that the iPhone | has had relative to everything it imperfectly replaced; or the | way services have replaced ownership in some areas of life? Given | the complexity involved, the current measure seems to do the job | well enough. | | As a side note, this mistrust of the CPI is something Eric | Weinstein loves to bring up, too, with the same narrative about | CPI being designed by politicians. After watching him try to | convince economists [0] of the points made in this article (and | avoiding questions that get specific or complex), I'm unconvinced | I need to care. | | [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5gnATQMtPg | nostrademons wrote: | Is there a relevant time point in that presentation? It looks | like the bulk of it is about inflation as in cosmology & | physics, not economics. | iamdamian wrote: | Here's a good place to start: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5gnATQMtPg&t=16m28s | | The video is a tad confusing. He has this idea that methods | from physics and calculus should be ported over to economics | to tackle unsolved problems like inflation, and he doesn't | clearly delineate the two when speaking. | | Notably, the economists in the room point out that the | theoretical problems he mentions have been tackled and do | incorporate calculus. However, they say the resulting theory | (e.g., the Divisia index) can't be practically applied at | scale. | | (That said, while I don't think his point has landed or | solved for anything new, I don't discount the value of | translating tools across disciplines if it leads to results.) | hartator wrote: | There is also the old debate between monetary inflation and price | inflation. Monetary inflation being the fact of just printing | money and used to be what you refer to in economics books when | you just say "inflation". | SkyMarshal wrote: | Yes that term does seem to get commingled with different | meanings. Increasing money supply vs increasing prices seem to | be the main ones. | | The former usually results in the latter, but not always, and | sometimes with lag. And sometimes prices can rise without an | increase in the money supply, for other reasons - a decrease in | supply, an increase in demand due to some other factor than | monetary inflation, etc. | | And that's not to mention the different measurements of money - | M0, M1, etc. - as subsets of monetary inflation. | | I wish economists and journalists would better differentiate by | using "monetary inflation", "price inflation", and/or other | qualifiers for exactly which one they're talking about. | ultrablack wrote: | Certainly inflation measures doesn't appear to take housing cost | into account. | [deleted] | [deleted] | nemo44x wrote: | In some markets, sure. However if you look at median home | prices from 1980 to today and factor in interest rates (which | are much lower today) and median income then you see that homes | are about the same as they were in terms of monthly payment. | With the upside today that early in your mortgage more of your | payment goes to principal. | | If interest rates were to go to 8% overnight, besides crashing | the global economy you'd see home prices cut in half. Homes are | priced at what people that want to live there are able to pay | per month. As interest rates fall home prices rise. Like I said | certain markets have outpaced but their median incomes have | outpaced as well. This makes sense as the upper middle class | has grown a lot the last 40 years to make up much more of the | population by percentage (there's a lot more high paying | professional jobs today) and people like to live among people | of similar financial classes for obvious reasons. | [deleted] | jeffreyrogers wrote: | There is a housing component to the CPI. It uses rents instead | of home prices and makes some tradeoffs, but it seems fair to | me overall. If you live in SF or NYC or similar cities it can | seem that CPI underestimates inflation due to high rents/home | price, but it is a national level metric, so that's somewhat | expected. | nabla9 wrote: | House prices are considered asset prices, not consumer goods. | | Only shelter part of housing is in the CPI. | hkt wrote: | There's a lot to be said about how measurements of inflation | could be improved, but this kind of blog is regrettably not one | of the useful ones. It has been a known quantity for a long time | - the wiki talk page is a good start: | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shadowstats.com#Shadows... | | Also, RationalWiki: | | https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shadow_Government_Statistics | notabanker wrote: | I would like to read a point-by-point critique of Shadowstats | but have yet to come across one. The wikis you've listed are | more muckraking in nature than a technical rebuttal. | | A poorly done critique increases rather than diminishes the | credibility of the target. | tacostakohashi wrote: | Try this: | | https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/07/17/the-i. | .. | mikeyouse wrote: | Even more simply - Shadowstats consumer inflation | calculator thinks we've had at least 7% inflation up until | ~2010 and then 10+% since then. | (http://www.shadowstats.com/imgs/sgs- | cpi.gif?hl=ad&t=16286924...) | | What in your life costs 500%+ more than it did in 1995 for | the same product? No need for in-depth debunking when it's | self-evidently nonsense. | nabla9 wrote: | The article is misguided. Assumes conspiracy. | | - Studies on CPI indicate that CPI is overestimated, not | underestimated. | | - It's known fact that inflation does not match the common | experience. It's solely because people remember easier large | price increases and can't weight them correctly. | | - There are other measures but they have even worse problems. For | policy issues core CPI is better. | jeffreyrogers wrote: | I think this is generally right, and if "real" CPI was much | higher than calculated you would see it eventually since the | difference between real and calculated would be compounded over | time. | | However, because CPI is done at the national level while people | typically live in one area, it is possible that HN readers in | SF or wherever experience higher inflation than the CPI | calculates. Certainly their rents have gone up much more than | someone's in Kansas City. | nabla9 wrote: | When you see news that say rent prices go trough roof, it | usually means new leases. If new leases go up 10% and only 5% | of renters sign a new lease, that's only 0.5% increase to | rents. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-08 23:00 UTC)