[HN Gopher] New horizons for SPJ
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       New horizons for SPJ
        
       Author : msszczep2
       Score  : 122 points
       Date   : 2021-09-09 19:36 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (discourse.haskell.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (discourse.haskell.org)
        
       | sys_64738 wrote:
       | These chaps always have doors open elsewhere through contacts.
       | I'd expect he'll show up at another major company or university
       | within six months.
        
       | ranguski wrote:
       | Weirdly, there are many who leaving MSFT in general. Looks like
       | they are doing something wrong.
        
         | phillipcarter wrote:
         | (I left MS recently)
         | 
         | Eh, I don't think it's any different than the general trend of
         | people moving around. 23 years at a company would indicate that
         | it's been a pretty solid place to work.
        
           | garmaine wrote:
           | At the same time, leaving after 23 years for a reason other
           | than retirement suggests something changed.
           | 
           | I have no insight into the company as you do, but that is the
           | first impression I'd get from the circumstances. People don't
           | stay at a company for 23 years only to jump ship for the same
           | reasons early-career people jump around.
        
             | dagw wrote:
             | Or you realize that you've spent basically your entire
             | professional career at one place and this is your last
             | chance to try something different.
        
         | gpt5 wrote:
         | The entire industry is experiencing an unusually high Turnover.
        
         | xyzzy_plugh wrote:
         | Bureaucracy.
        
         | dagw wrote:
         | He's been at Microsoft for 23 years and it's basically the only
         | company he's ever worked at. He's also over 60. I can't blame
         | him for wanting to try something else with the tail end of his
         | career.
        
         | dfgjnirf wrote:
         | SPJ had a great deal of latitude at MSR Cambridge, he could
         | probably work on almost whatever he wanted. The problem is MSFT
         | is rife with bureaucracy and it is a constant fight to get
         | anything done. MSFT in general and MSR Cambridge specifically
         | has lost a lot of their best people over the last 10 years.
         | AFAIK it is expected to get worse under Christopher Bishop.
         | With the recent win in Excel Lambda it is as probably a good
         | time as any to get out.
        
           | Olumde wrote:
           | This is precisely why SPJ leaving at this time is all the
           | more surprising.
        
       | andybak wrote:
       | I know we're not supposed to question these things but the edit
       | to this title made it worse.
        
       | maxpert wrote:
       | The fact that there is more discussion here vs the Haskell forum
       | is weird. I've not used Haskell myself but aspire to use it
       | someday. I wish him best of luck!
        
       | wk_end wrote:
       | I wonder if this is because Microsoft Research is no longer
       | interested in funding his research, or if for whatever reason SPJ
       | is just seeking greener pastures.
       | 
       | Either way, it's a blow to MSR - SPJ is such a luminary in the
       | world of Haskell/PLT. Best wishes for whatever he winds up doing
       | next; no doubt it'll be great.
        
         | ampdepolymerase wrote:
         | Not necessarily, young blood is always good. Having a single
         | academic dominate the discussion is never good.
        
           | sjcoles wrote:
           | Two Haskellers enter a bar. Two hours later both leave more
           | confused than when they entered.
           | 
           | This is what got me with Haskell. Any question is derailed
           | into theory to the point where getting anything done is
           | difficult.
        
             | cole-k wrote:
             | I would be careful making such generalizations lest you
             | give this vocal minority of haskellers more reason to
             | believe that non-haskellers are luddites (edit: can you use
             | the word "luddite" to refer to people who don't like
             | theory? Probably not but pretend that's what it means).
        
               | sjcoles wrote:
               | I've used Haskell for a few personal projects (GHC
               | 6.8-7.0 timeframe). It is great but I stand by my
               | statement that the community's obsession with complexity
               | (even if it's simpler from a category or maths sense) is
               | the issue. Haskell's community is almost *obsessed* with
               | increasing cognitive load IMO.
               | 
               | I want to make things not argue about the best, or most
               | technically correct, way to make them.
        
             | elihu wrote:
             | "If your confusion leads you in the right direction, the
             | results can be uncommonly rewarding" --Haruki Murakami,
             | Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World (as
             | translated to English)
        
             | butterisgood wrote:
             | I've shipped stuff written in Haskell almost 2 times... but
             | actually one time.
             | 
             | It's not that bad. Honestly the only reason we shipped it
             | was because the prototype I did in it worked too well.
             | 
             | I had a backup almost ready in time written in C++ in case
             | it got too tricky for others to maintain, and it was a
             | simple component in a larger software stack.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-09 23:01 UTC)