[HN Gopher] The Buffett Indicator ___________________________________________________________________ The Buffett Indicator Author : xqcgrek2 Score : 27 points Date : 2021-09-12 20:31 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.currentmarketvaluation.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.currentmarketvaluation.com) | chrisblackwell wrote: | Just a reminder that a larger portion of today's market value is | made up from Tech stocks. Tech stocks are typically higher | valuations and P/E multiples, giving a skewed data point | perspective vs. 20 years ago. | aazaa wrote: | Market excesses are always marked by a "hot" sector. Remember | the Nifty 50? | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nifty_Fifty | | The members of that group were the tech giants of their time. | | Replace "large-cap" with "tech" in that article. Rinse and | repeat. | dbs wrote: | Same can be said of market valuation in 99/00. | | And just like at that time people are looking for adjusted | valuation measures and all type of excuses to justify | unrealistic growth expectations. | | Like ALL previous bubbles it will end in tears. | mmmmkay wrote: | This doesn't take into account interest rates. | | Buffett himself has said recently that given the current interest | rates stocks are not overvalued. | mmmmkay wrote: | nvm, just got to the "Criticisms of The Buffett Indicator" | section where they cover just this topic :) | [deleted] | ethbr0 wrote: | The problem with macro-economic composites is that at that level, | everything is unfolding on different timescales. So around | transitional moments, your end result is going to go wonky. | | GDP plummets -> interest rates are dropped -> GDP recovers -> | interest rates are raised | | You're balancing between responsiveness, accuracy, and | reliability: pick two. | | I'd have thought the last few crises would have taught us that we | should be thinking about the system more in terms of stability, | or lack thereof. | | The housing crisis _could_ have not exploded, if key institutions | and /or investors had acted differently. But it _was_ objectively | true that the entire system was in a very unstable state. | aazaa wrote: | The problem with these indicators is that, although they may | indicate over- or undervaluation, they tell you nothing about | _when_ a mean reversion will happen. | | As Keynes famously said: "The market can stay irrational longer | than you can stay solvent." | | An indicator that does a pretty good job of signaling the "when" | of a recession, and by extension the likely "when" of large | market corrections, is yield curve inversion. It predicted the | recession of early 2020 quite well, even with the external shock | of the pandemic. | | https://www.forbes.com/sites/leonlabrecque/2020/02/26/anothe... | | From the perspective that somehow a reset of the business cycle | has happened through government transfers (not exactly a sound | assumption), watch interest rates, and in particular the | relationship between the 2 and 10 year. | | Should we start to see a rise in short-term rates, without a | similar rise in long rates, watch out. You'll no doubt see a | multitude of articles explaining how "this time is different." It | won't be. And on top of all of that, we'll head into it with the | most overvalued market in history. | hhmc wrote: | An inverted yield curve has accurately predicted 9 out of the | last 5 recessions ;) | | You can even see it on the chart in the linked article, in | 2005/06 -- that time, it was different. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-12 23:00 UTC)