[HN Gopher] How to Raise Investment ___________________________________________________________________ How to Raise Investment Author : tomblomfield Score : 127 points Date : 2021-09-13 09:23 UTC (13 hours ago) (HTM) web link (tomblomfield.com) (TXT) w3m dump (tomblomfield.com) | dqpb wrote: | Be careful going to this website. It doesn't let you go back out. | smackeyacky wrote: | This advice is interesting, but almost entirely useless for | anybody outside the US / Silicon Valley bubble. Exactly how are | you going to go for coffee with your "VC buddies" if you live | 8,000km away? The idea is frankly ridiculous for anybody not in a | tiny circle. edit: apparently London is the same. Only further | away. | | This article really highlights how stupid frauds like Theranos | get funded. The real answer is between the lines: | | To get funded: | | a) Be connected, physically close and already in the clique. b) | Don't be outside the clique. | | I mean I get the idea that rich kids giving their rich mates | money to start yet another dogshit fintech is just how the game | is played, but what a frustrating time it is for the rest of us. | fxtentacle wrote: | With the "open in app" banner on top, the "never miss a post" | banner in the middle and the cookie banner at the bottom, I can | see exactly 4 lines of text on my smartphone screen. | | Lucky for me, I have the Firefox reader mode. But to every | regular person, this presentation screams "the actual text is not | important". | HWR_14 wrote: | Safari reader mode also seems to work | reducesuffering wrote: | How do you decide between raising money and bootstrapping (like | Mailchimp acquired for $12b today did)? I think the typical | response is whether you want to be a bigger $1b+ company or die, | or just slowly see where it takes you by the revenue of your | customers. But how do you estimate the eventual potential/TAM of | your startup/business as something that needs funding to grow | ASAP? You can't really trust VC's opinions as they're self- | interested. | bradvl wrote: | Thanks for sharing this Tom. Just shared it with my cofounder. | rememberlenny wrote: | For anyone interested in raising money soon, but not immediately, | the best thing you can do is start an weekly update email. | | Start sending thing to all the people you interview for advice, | supporters you know in the same space, and peers/coworkers. If | you keep a regular email showing your progress, even though you | may not have traction, potential investors will see the pace at | which you are developing/iterating, and have a reference point to | be able to cut a check. | | I started this 3 months before I planned on raising any money, | and it allowed for people who were on the email to confidently | make recommendations on my behalf to investors they knew, and | also made our company top of mind. | | I have continued this for almost a year now, and its led to | customer development opportunities, investment inbound, and a | steam of good relevant advice. | imraj96 wrote: | Do you have a structure to your update emails? And from your | experience, what shouldn't be included in an update email? | tomblomfield wrote: | I broadly agree, but weekly seems like the effort outweighs the | benefit. | | It seems like fortnightly or monthly gets the same impact with | 25-50% effort. | corry wrote: | One note of caution. As someone who gets a lot of these kinds | of update emails, it's also very apparent when or when not a | company is hitting an inflection point. | | Why does that matter? | | If things are going well, great - you'll have a much easier | time fundraising. The potential investors on your list will see | your progress and realize they have a chance to preempt. | | If things are not going well, you're providing a continuous | stream of proof that you haven't cracked the nut yet. Which | there is no shame in. But broadcasting that can be harmful. | | So what do you do? It's tempting to hype up your updates so it | looks more positive. Or should you be honest (which your ACTUAL | investors and advisors need to help you)? Hmmm. Or do you run 2 | update emails, the insider one and outsider one? | | OR do you just focus on growth, and realize that none of this | matters if you're growing 300% YoY at non-trivial revenue? | Imagine if the time you spent on a weekly email was spent on | making 5 add'l client calls? | | Final thing to be aware of. The most powerful force in | fundraising is FOMO. Every VC or angel investors has an "oh | shit" moment when a startup they kind of know (but had kind of | written off) all of a sudden is doing a hot round, and you feel | late to the party. | | I'm not telling anyone to NOT do update emails like this. Just | recognize the signal leakage and really evaluate if the time | spent is worth it. | shoto_io wrote: | Thanks for the insights. Makes a ton of sense. | | So the main question as a corollary to your statement is: How | do you effectively create investor FOMO? Do you have any | experience to share here as well? | adventured wrote: | > How do you effectively create investor FOMO? | | By succeeding. | | That sounds either snarky or obvious, however, I mean it | quite literally. The absolute single best way to create | investor fear of missing out, is to actually succeed at | what you're doing. There's nothing close to that. Succeed | at whatever stage you're at and be able to demonstrate that | to the potential investors. If you're the real deal, you | can build, execute and deliver on what you're attempting | and claiming. Nothing prompts FOMO from investors like | actually delivering and building up a demonstrated chain of | success as you go; they see it, and they want to be part of | it. | | All the other methods are shady, deceitful, disingenuous, | fake it until you make it types of bullshit cons. Akin to | attempting to trick someone into funding you (ha! look at | that! I made myself look more successful than I am, I | really pulled one over on them; Theranos). | tnolet wrote: | Having raised a seed and A-series in the last 1,5 years from top | tier VC's in the B2B space: this post is 100% spot on. | | Will recommend. | | We actually used the YC seed and A-series pitchdeck templates the | OP mentions. | | Last thing: everything becomes 1000% easier if you have | customers. Focus on customers. Raising becomes almost easy after | that. | anonymouse008 wrote: | I've had customers for a bit -- couple K to setup with some | monthly recurring revenue (#00/month) and have really struggled | to raise. | | Just a weird looking TAM (small as all get out and competitive | market) is all I can chalk it up to - or I'm a crappy story | teller | sjwhitworth wrote: | I asked Tom for some of this advice earlier this year. Glad to | see he wrote it up into a blog post -- it's really useful! | question002 wrote: | Buy a lot of upvotes on HN... Profit!!! | | Look at the comments, it's gamed! | johnnybaptist wrote: | "Probably 30% of the rounds I've raised have been "hot" - and | very fast. 70% have been hard work, slow and stressful." | | My favorite part. The ideal scenario is running a tight, targeted | and short process for a hot deal...but don't be surprised if that | doesn't happen. | 0des wrote: | On a sidenote, I'd be interested in reading an article exploring | the inverse of this! How to -not- raise investment. Most people | look at funding like "yeah well I mean that's just the thing you | do" but it's not for all cases. Sometimes tossing gasoline on | something is just enough to make it fizzle. | | I'm looking forward to the pendulum swinging back around to 2022, | bring on the slow-biz startups, the organic growth, gimme 2x and | 3x, bootstrapped on shoestrings, companies run by people who | created those companies. | | I have this reflex every time I see something cool now where I | can't enjoy new SaaS offerings because I'm always trying to | imagine the ways in which this new cool thing can backfire and | frustrate me once it takes funding or goes public. I don't think | it's a problem in me, either, that model just sucks. | FinanceAnon wrote: | I like this article: "Venture capital money kills more | businesses than it helps" | | https://www.vox.com/2019/1/23/18193685/venture-capital-money... | tomblomfield wrote: | Author here - happy to answer any questions | tin7in wrote: | Thanks for sharing this, Tom! | | Should European remote startups re-domicile in the US for | fundraising (or other) purposes? | | We have a London presence/HQ, the team works from 4 European | countries, and we raised pre-seed during Covid. | 0des wrote: | Thanks for sharing with us, I would love to read "How not to | raise investment", exploring the inverse. As in, not how to | attract funding in bad ways, but exploring the ways that | funding or maybe a misaligned partnership can skew the | trajectory of nascent startups/concepts. | gethigher wrote: | AD: great article Tom, covers a lot of questions I've had. One | I didn't see was in regards to mentors. How important would you | say having a mentor was to some of your initial raises? If at | all? | tomjohnneill wrote: | Interesting to read those valuation benchmarks. I'd seen this | article in SeedLegals previously | https://seedlegals.com/resources/how-to-value-your-company/ | that seem to be quite a lot lower. | | It was written at the end of 2019, do you think it's just | wrong? Or has it changed that much in the past 2 years? Or is | it a different set of startups? | DEDLINE wrote: | Most comprehensive article I have read on fundraising at the | Seed / Series-A level. Well done and thank you for your | contribution. | tomblomfield wrote: | Thanks for reading :-) | asien wrote: | To be very clear , this articles won't help you much if you don't | fit the criteria's the OP does. | | Having discussed with VC a long time ago , it was very HARD to | raise money without a very strong traction. | | Very often VC were convinced with my pitch , and my product but | would not invest either because they had stuff somewhat similar | in their portfolio and often because I didn't have a "track | records" to proof my capability. | | If I can recommend one thing to technical founder : don't listen | to this and build slowly while creating your own community ( | users , customers etc...) and VC will come , don't worry. | | VCs are like dogs when they smell money they have the urge to | come at you, you won't need to call them. | | For non-tech founder it's the opposite : don't make anything that | is complicated or sophisticated, focus 100% on marketing and | prototyping , I had friends raising 10M+EUR for products that | didn't exist or couldn't do a tenth of what was promised , but | because they graduated from the most prestigious schools in Paris | or London and had invested hundred of thousands in marketing ( | 50KEUR Website , Dozens of Articles in the Press claiming their | idea was worth billions , Attending Conferences to reach out to | executives in order to get corporates sponsors etc..) | | VCs will prefer a strong team with a stupid idea that a Fortune | 500 will be naive enough to acquire , rather than a good idea | with an unproven team that would make money quickly after initial | build phase. | dboreham wrote: | Exactly. Remember also that VC are rich and powerful therefore | much of what you read and think about investing and startups is | written for their benefit. Avoid drinking the kool aid. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-13 23:00 UTC)