[HN Gopher] Intel issues end-of-life notice for RealSense Lidar ___________________________________________________________________ Intel issues end-of-life notice for RealSense Lidar Author : thesausageking Score : 83 points Date : 2021-09-13 16:15 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.therobotreport.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.therobotreport.com) | spockz wrote: | So what is this? In this thread and previous threads I read many | comments about people being hit by intel dropping the shoe on | products that are actually great. Why don't they capitalise on | these great products and actually diversify? | randomluck040 wrote: | In our area I think where I work we're the only ones that have | a bunch of those sensors. It's niche, HN in general is niche so | I think they're not selling millions of their LIDAR sensors. | Still for those that rely on them it's sad. | RC_ITR wrote: | Because of course every one of (the very few) users is going to | complain on HN about a product they use being EOL'ed. | | An to put it in perspective, Intel's IOT group, which is (lol) | mostly Point of Sale and MRI machines, does $3bn of revenue a | year. | | Intel is a big ship, and outside of new platforms (like | smartphones were), there are few meaningful ways to diversify. | | Hell, even if they bought NXP (one of the actual leaders in | IOT), that would still only constitute 10% of their revenue. | michaelt wrote: | Because the 'great products' aren't selling in large enough | volumes to cover the division's wage bill. | | And presumably they don't think selling far fewer at a much | higher price would do so either. | Causality1 wrote: | What's the point of winding down departments like this? Spin them | off into their own company to sink or swim. | dagmx wrote: | Not surprised. I had one of their devices, and it was just a | mess. | | The resolution and reliability was not as good as comparable | devices in the price range like Microsoft's Azure Kinect DK. | | Their software didn't work as well as what Microsoft cooked up, | and it always felt like they put out this product and then just | forgot about it. | michaelt wrote: | Eh, it doesn't matter how low the price is for the Azure Kinect | if you can't buy them at the price. | | And you're still stuck with USB C on Kinect, so it's not like | it lets you escape the consumer-grade reliability. | | If there are other devices with the same performance as the | realsense lidar at a lower price, we'd all love to hear about | them! | dheera wrote: | "Consumer-grade" reliability really should be the _highest- | grade_ reliability. Cables get cantilevered by standing | desks, rolled over by office chairs, bitten by dogs, chewed | by babies, shoved in pockets and skiied with, and sat on. | | The people who designed USB-C were probably lazy people | sitting in office chairs all day and never got out enough to | see what real consumers do. | | I break about a USB-C cable a week. Never happened with | headphone jacks, barrel connectors, IEC power connectors, and | the like -- those are real consumer grade stuff, especially | IEC. | sudosysgen wrote: | Get a good quality cable. I break USB-C cables maybe once | every year and a half, less often than I broke headphones | or microUSB. | dheera wrote: | I break Anker PowerLine+ cables all the time, not sure | what's better. | | The connector design itself is shit, and the rubberized | housing of the connector isn't mechanically supported as | any self-respecting consumer-grade cable should be, all | torque transfers to the PCB and that's horrible design. | klodolph wrote: | Definitely shouldn't be anywhere near highest reliability. | Professional equipment has to stand up to a lot more use-- | like a camera you use every day, made with more metal and | with thick rubberized grips. If I have a personal camera, | I'll take care not to drop it. If I'm a professional | photographer, the question is how often it gets dropped. If | we're talking cables, "professional" grade (to me) means | the connectors are going to get hundreds of cycles per | year, and the cables might have to snake across the floor | and get tread on five days a week. In general, "pro" grade | stuff can be bigger, bulkier, more expensive. | | Then there's stuff built for public spaces. ATMs, books in | the public library, turnstyles at the metro, etc. All | designed to be in close contact with people who either just | don't care or are actively trying to damage it. | | TBH I don't know what the grade _below_ consumer-grade | would be. | derefr wrote: | I would say that the grade below consumer grade is | "functional prop" grade. | | There's a type of consumer electronics available on | Wish/AliExpress/etc., which is designed for people who | want to _appear at a glance to be using_ a certain | expensive device, for status-signalling reasons. The | devices only have to be real enough to allow you to | pretend to be using them without drawing suspicion, and | only have to be rugged enough to last until the device | being mimicked isn't fashionable to have any more (at | which point you get a new knock-off aping the new cool | thing.) | | Surprisingly, these devices do _work!_ They wouldn 't be | convincing otherwise. (How can you seem to be using the | best new phone if you have to pull out a different phone | to check your text messages? How can you seem to be | playing a Switch or a PS4 if it doesn't turn on and show | pictures and sound on the screen/a TV?) It's just that | they work as terribly as you can imagine, given that | costs are optimized to meet the minimum needs of someone | playing pretend and no more. | robotresearcher wrote: | Mil-spec? | dheera wrote: | Military people just sit in canopies and hit buttons | these days. | | Consumers are the ones that will actually have cables | _bitten_ , _chewed_ , _stomped_ , sat on by unfit, heavy | civilian asses, jammed into wheels of office chairs, | rammed into by strangers' hips in coffee shops when your | connector hangs off the edge, dunked in cereal, | splattered by kitchen grease, smashed into rocks at | Yosemite, and shoved into bags while plugged in after a | slow TSA checkpoint and needing to sprint as fast as | possible to a departure gate. | | Very different set of ruggedness requirements. Most | cables of the 80s and 90s were completely fine in these | civilian environments. | InfiniteRand wrote: | Jerk grade reliability, this stuff will explode if | stepped on | [deleted] | snovv_crash wrote: | Honestly, I have no idea what Intel was doing playing with | sensors and robots. I think the previous CEO was trying to | diversify, seeing his failures in the CPU business, and rather | than playing to company's strengths he looked at whatever hot | tech was out there. | Traster wrote: | Yeah the previous CEO bascially announced a number of big bets | - AI, 5G, VR, Autonomous Driving and one or two others (can't | remember off the top of my head), they were all associated with | a number of big acquisitions most of which ended pretty | embarassingly (Altera for 5G, MobilEye for Autonomous driving, | Nervana for AI etc) | | It followed the same familiar pattern, screw up the company | over a long protracted acquisition, try to gain market share | through bundling, all whilst driving the core talent ouf of the | business by completely failing to invest. This is a big reason | where Intel's problems came from. They looked to diversify | rather than deliver. | jsight wrote: | How is mobileye embarrassing? They seem to be overwhelmingly | the most common choice among automotive OEMs, and their | growth rate is really solid already. | zamadatix wrote: | RealSense camera technology was used in laptops for Windows | Hello the same way as Intel NICs and Intel GPUs and Intel audio | controllers and Intel SSDs were used by their traditional | segment. | | It'd be a bit silly for Intel to be successful in all of those | spaces and not ask "and what would it look like to sell this | part without bundling our CPU". | worrycue wrote: | This isn't the first time Intel has flirted with things outside | their core competence. They dabbled with SSDs, mobile phone | modems, ... etc. It's just something Intel does. Why? Don't | know. | bluGill wrote: | All companies need to flirt with things that might be good. | Some of those things will turn out so great that you leave | your orignial company behind, while others will be duds that | you drop, and still others will be small side businesses that | make you a bit of money in down times but otherwise are just | barely worth doing. Intel used to be a memory company that | flirted with making CPUs. I don't recall when they left the | memory business (I think in the 1980s) | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | Intel used to be a RAM company that sold microprocessors as | a side business. | thrashh wrote: | I mean we've had Bell Labs et. al. and now we have | transistors, Unix, CCDs to allow digital cameras, etc... | | They can keep on trucking with R&D | yann2 wrote: | They are big enough to take the loss. No harm in trying. | joezydeco wrote: | Unless you actually get duped into using XScale, Zephyr, | Edison, etc.... | snovv_crash wrote: | I get SSDs and modems, this allows them to leverage their | fabs. Maybe even CCDs. But 3D computational geometry, camera | lenses and LIDAR? And drones? This seems a bit out-of-line to | me. | morcheeba wrote: | The sad thing is that Intel had a real advantage in | RealSense... they had good processors in there (especially | with the Movidius chips) that were well integrated (e.g. they | didn't have to support a fancy SDK for all users - just the | internal Realsense group). Doing the same 3d processing with | ARM or Intel is 1/10th the frame rate at much more power. | reasonabl_human wrote: | Can you elaborate on the benefits of what intel built here | as opposed to doing the processing on host machines? My | company uses these in some products but I never | investigated the market or trade space for this type of | device | morcheeba wrote: | Yeah! There is a lot of processing to do the disparity | calculation... it's basically doing lots of correlations | with a different amount of x shift and finding the | delta-x that has the highest correlation. This delta-x | disparity gets calculated in to a z distance. | | So, intel made a custom processor for this that's really | good at the correlations. The original one was the D4, | and later they used their movidius chip. Both have lots | of multiplier-accumulate silicon, so it can do the | computations in parallel. Their architectures are also | set up for convolution (which re-uses a lot of data) | rather than random-processing (like a CPU does), so they | could feed these math engines without a lot of data | transfer -- this makes it more power efficient. You could | do something similar in an FPGA, but dedicated silicon is | going to be faster, cheaper, and use less power. | sseagull wrote: | Tech companies don't know what to do with all their money | (although Intel perhaps a bit less so). | | Google's core is search & advertising. But they are also in | email, video streaming, messaging & video chat, cloud | computing, mobile phones, gaming (Stadia), self-driving cars, | drone delivery, quantum computing, and probably many other | things that I can't think of. | | Edit: Yes I know it's technically Alphabet, but in practical | terms, it's Google | rualca wrote: | > Tech companies don't know what to do with all their money | (although Intel perhaps a bit less so). | | Lidar has high computational needs, which directly | influences accuracy, and both spacial and time resolution. | | Post-processing steps also have high computational needs, | such as infering structure, do coregistration, handle point | density, etc. | | Also, practical applications often demand and depend on | meeting constraints such as low power requirements and | size. | | If a company such as Intel managed to leverage their know- | how to provide Lidar hardware that was competitive in both | performance and price then they could as well develop a | machine that prints money. | kypro wrote: | I tested one of their preproduction LIDAR cameras just before it | was released and it was great. Their SR305 was also really good | for close-range, high precision applications, but they scraped | that model earlier this year. | | For us it was the SR305 we were interested in as it had the specs | we needed at the right price point. We had a meeting with the | RealSense team about a year and a half ago and they strongly | hinted at the SR305 being EOL soon which made it very hard for us | to commit to RealSense for the project we were working on. | | I'm quite surprised about this news though. Back then they | suggested that LIDAR and stereo cameras would be their focus | going forward. I can only assume this must be a recent move given | what we were told back then and that the L515 is relatively new. | | Huge shame about their facial auth products too. My understanding | is that these are used in quite a few products, but they also use | structed light tech so I assume that's why that decision was | made. | | It's worth noting that the L515 isn't replaceable by the D455 in | many use cases. The D455 is good, but doesn't have the same kind | of range and precision the L515 has. It's depth data is also far | nosier, as is often the case with stereo depth cameras. | rcv wrote: | This is a real shame - I just finished lobbying to use these at | work after some very successful initial prototypes. | | Does anyone have any experience with the TI mmWave sensors[1] for | AMR collision avoidance? | | [1] https://www.ti.com/sensors/mmwave-radar/overview.html | drno123 wrote: | My company built several successfull products using TI's mmWave | sensors. If you'd like more info, send me your contact to | mmwave@mailinator.com, I will be checking that mailbox today | and tomorrow. | madars wrote: | You probably don't want to use mailinator.com address for | this: anyone can read messages sent to it. | scrowe1 wrote: | Wonder when the same will ultimately happen to the stereo depth | cameras. what are some good alternatives here? | corndoge wrote: | I heard the whole division is shutting down so probably won't | be long now. | zwieback wrote: | I thought that already happened? I think they are just selling | what they have now but stopped development. Keyence, Flir and a | few other established machine vision companies have stereo | systems but nothing like RealSense, which was trying to make | stereo more of a mainstream application. | rcv wrote: | They aren't officially EOLing the stereo cameras yet, but | their assurances about how long they'll remain in production | have been very hand-wavey. | | Does FLIR actually have a stereo solution? Back when they | were Point Grey they sold the Bumblebee, but all of the | stereo processing was done on the host machine. | zwieback wrote: | Yeah, I guess that's obsolete too. My experience with | stereo is that there's so much work in calibration and | ensuring you get reliable correlation results between | regions from the two cameras that plug-and-play solutions | are very hard. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-13 23:00 UTC)