[HN Gopher] Groundbreaking arm amputation surgery makes a 'phant...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Groundbreaking arm amputation surgery makes a 'phantom' hand seem
       real
        
       Author : hhs
       Score  : 129 points
       Date   : 2021-09-18 14:55 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.statnews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.statnews.com)
        
       | tyingq wrote:
       | This short video of a guy operating a motorized prosthetic foot
       | is really interesting:
       | 
       | https://videos-fms.jwpsrv.com/0_6146535c_0xe8e28ca538bc35a69...
       | 
       | And this article does a better job of explaining the surgery:
       | https://bionicsforeveryone.com/agonist-antagonist-myoneural-...
       | 
       | I guess, in a nutshell, they attach a small amount of muscle to
       | the nerve that controls something that's going to be cut off. And
       | they anchor that muscle on both ends. So that contracting and
       | relaxing it provides a real-world force feedback loop. Really
       | clever.
        
       | hanoz wrote:
       | This reminds me of an experiment recounted in a great book
       | _Phantoms in the Brain_ , which I always wanted to try.
       | 
       | The subject sits with a model nose placed some distance in front
       | of them on which someone taps and strokes in some non predictable
       | fashion. At the same time the subject's own nose is touched in
       | precisely the same pattern. Subjects apparently report an
       | overwhelming sensation that the model nose, some meters in front
       | of them, is thier own nose!
        
       | golemotron wrote:
       | With an article title like that, you have no idea what you are in
       | for.
        
       | amjaeger wrote:
       | https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.aan2971
       | 
       | This is one of the first papers describing the AMI surgery.
        
       | cududa wrote:
       | Caveat: not a neuroscientist, but have worked with many and been
       | involved in MRI and fMRI imaging for investigating HCI concepts/
       | products and marketing. As well, when I was younger had
       | trigeminal neuralgia, considered the most painful disease
       | (explained below), and became fascinated with neuroscience.
       | 
       | The approach of closing the loop on agonist/ antagonist feedback
       | in muscle fibers makes an enormous amount of sense and is
       | brilliant.
       | 
       | Without the two "outbound requests" happening in a closed system
       | the brain is left to approximate the difference between the
       | slight signal shift. Even nanosecond differences in "send/
       | receive" requests would be registered as pain.
       | 
       | I had a neurological condition called trigeminal neuralgia where
       | the myelin wears down between the positive/ negative nerve
       | bundles in the trigeminal nerve and occasionally touch.
       | 
       | The reason it's considered the most painful affliction is the
       | trigeminal nerve is where your whole body's pain, pressure, and
       | heat sensory nerves converge. So when the +/- touch, every fiber
       | of you feels like it's being stabbed, burned, and crushed at the
       | same time. About 90% of folks with it have have one occlusion in
       | the myelin and will feel excruciating pain in a localized are. I
       | had 9 full occlusions and 20+ partial. So lucky me, I got to
       | experience it through my whole body.
       | 
       | Basically, when the +/- nerves touch, no part of your body is
       | receiving/ returning the expected "latency" for pain, pressure,
       | or heat, and perceives the differences of return times as nerves
       | (including those in agonist/ antagonist muscle) being split/
       | damaged, thus a pain response.
       | 
       | Totally makes sense that closing the proper agonist/ antagonist
       | fibers to create a proper feedback loop could eliminate the
       | unexpected diff on signal requests that trigger phantom pain.
       | 
       | EDIT: Just to give yourself some real world examples.. Do
       | something like build a fence with your friends, all day. One
       | person operates the saw, one the hammer, so on and so fourth.
       | 
       | At the end of the day using the same tool in repetition, hold
       | your tool, everyone applies blindfolds, then have an
       | "experimenter" touch the subjects forearm at different points.
       | They'll experience the touch at a different point than if they
       | weren't holding the tool.
       | 
       | When you use something for a long time you integrate it into your
       | "body schema" - basically your brains map of yourself.
       | 
       | My absolute favorite example of body schema extension are
       | experienced crane operators in docks. They can see a container on
       | a ship, need to place it on a massive pile they've been building
       | all day, and can no longer see in their line of vision where
       | they'll place it. But they can still do it without being able to
       | see where they're dropping it.
       | 
       | All that's to say - your brain builds better and better models of
       | it's container (body) and environment by developing more and more
       | precise models of input/ output diff expectations and essentially
       | a "path prediction" algorithm.
       | 
       | When the actual data is outside of parameter/ estimates get out
       | of whack, we experience things like pain where there's no harm.
       | But in an amputee, agonist/ antagonist muscle fibers are no
       | longer on the same circuit. The body adapts, and sends two
       | different "ping" requests to both channels.
       | 
       | So I guess to simplify all that: When theres a micron of
       | difference in length in key paired muscle fibers (as is common in
       | amputations, injury, etc), the brain sends two signals, diffs the
       | return times and if they're out of wack with past lived
       | experience you get pain.
       | 
       | While the amputee still doesn't have the "normal" limb length the
       | body is expecting, closing the loop provides the expected send/
       | receive timing variance.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | How did you cure your condition?
        
           | cududa wrote:
           | Was an experimental one, and actually need to get part of it
           | repaired soon which I'm not looking forward to.
           | 
           | But basically, the trigeminal nerve bundle comes up from your
           | neck through your right jawbone, heads up around your mouth
           | and cheek bone to your ear and brain stem.
           | 
           | Mine involved having a molar removed (I need a new false one
           | - this one got me 16 years but the new ones are billed as
           | lasting a life time) with laparoscopic surgery to move up
           | into the cavity, and insert small bits of poly-fibers between
           | the offending occlusions in the myelin. If they manage to get
           | all of the offending parts, the myelin degradation stops -
           | for most people. Some with atypical cases or a case brought
           | on by multiple sclerosis there's no cure. As it is, there's
           | no treatment for symptoms but my god for those without a
           | solution, assisted suicide is truly the only humane thing.
        
       | Buttons840 wrote:
       | > Outside of a brain scanner, the restoration of proprioception
       | can in some ways give patients the feeling of having a real foot.
       | One AMI amputee was hiking recently while wearing a standard
       | prosthesis and stepped into a creek. He later described having
       | the sensation of water flowing over his prosthetic foot even
       | though it had no way to perceive that. "He trusted or embodied
       | his prosthesis more than someone who doesn't have this phantom
       | sensation," said Carty.
       | 
       | I read about an experiment where people were shown various black
       | and white drawings over random grayish backgrounds. They then had
       | to estimate the hue of the grayish background - which was
       | tricking because it only has slight amount of red, or blue, etc).
       | The results clearly shows that the black sketch which was
       | overlayed on the gray background skewered peoples perceptions of
       | the color of the background. People could not simply observe the
       | color of the background without their other knowledge skewing
       | their perception.
       | 
       | Yet another example that we don't really get a "raw feed" from
       | out senses. What we perceive has already gone through a lot of
       | "post-processing" by our brain.
        
         | agumonkey wrote:
         | do you know research about proprioception instability ?
        
         | krisoft wrote:
         | Absolutely. This is one of the reason why it is really hard to
         | explain to laymans why robotic perception is hard. The
         | conversation usually goes: why can't you just make it do
         | "obviously good action" when "condition" happens? And since
         | "condition" is something they can just see it is hard to
         | convince them the robot doesn't have access to it in a clear
         | and unambigous maner.
        
           | GravitasFailure wrote:
           | Rodney Brooks talked about building an ant robot trying to
           | mimic the real thing. He said a real ant has hundreds of
           | thousands to millions of sensors while the robot his team
           | built had 150, and they only barely could handle that. The
           | data living things gather from their environment and the
           | processing used on it is absolutely mind boggling.
        
             | alisonkisk wrote:
             | A phone camera has millions of sensors...
        
         | wyldfire wrote:
         | > Yet another example that we don't really get a "raw feed"
         | from out senses. What we perceive has already gone through a
         | lot of "post-processing" by our brain.
         | 
         | Looking forward to HDR and Image Stablization in Humanity 2.0
         | coming in 102022.
        
           | adwn wrote:
           | > in 102022
           | 
           | Is this refering to the holocene calendar? [1] If yes, then I
           | think you meant "12022" - unless you're really pessimistic
           | about the timeline...
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar
        
         | GordonS wrote:
         | > I read about an experiment where people were shown various
         | black and white drawings over random grayish backgrounds. They
         | then had to estimate the hue of the grayish background - which
         | was tricking because it only has slight amount of red, or blue,
         | etc)
         | 
         | I'm colour blind, and if a picture is in black and white, I
         | can't always tell.
         | 
         | A long while back our CRT TV broke, and started displaying
         | everything without colour - I had no idea until my wife pointed
         | it out! It's like my mind just makes up what it doesn't see.
         | 
         | Another example that I always use is grass: if you showed me a
         | cropped image of grass and I didn't know it was grass, I'll
         | tell you "I don't know what colour it is, but I think it's
         | either red, brown or green". But if you point to some grass,
         | I'll always say "it's green!".
        
           | Timpy wrote:
           | I'm curious about your experience, do you actually feel like
           | you are seeing green, or do you just know that green is the
           | correct answer?
           | 
           | We had a bunch of different candies on the table at game
           | night and I gave my friend some M&Ms, he thought they came
           | from a bag of mint flavored M&Ms. He said, "wow I never tried
           | these before, they really taste like mint." We all did a
           | double take, he definitely did not eat mint M&Ms, I don't
           | really remember if we even had mint M&Ms at the table. I
           | believe him when he says he says he tasted mint though, like
           | his brain placeboed the mint into place.
        
             | GordonS wrote:
             | With the TV, I actually feel like I'm seeing colours, even
             | if I don't know exactly what they are.
             | 
             | With the grass example, I'm actually not entirely sure! I
             | mean, I obviously know that green is the correct answer,
             | but that knowledge kind of makes me feel like I'm seeing
             | green.
             | 
             | But colour blindness is kind of weird, because for any
             | given thing/colour it's never just "I don't know" - I can
             | narrow it down to a few options, and _usually_ one of them
             | is the correct one; like for a desaturated green, I might
             | think it 's grey, green or pink.
        
               | Deestan wrote:
               | I wonder if it is related to the gray/red strawberry
               | effect https://www.illusionsindex.org/i/grey-strawberries
        
         | jvanderbot wrote:
         | To control a large body with ample signal propegation delays,
         | the brain probably predicts a lot (Werner's "Cybernetics" --
         | outdated but not wrong). Big bodies have bigger brains
         | partially for this reason.
        
       | einpoklum wrote:
       | This almost sounds like it's about the NVIDIA's trouble with the
       | ARM deal.
        
       | ouid wrote:
       | I have always felt that the reason that we can't run in dreams is
       | because the sensation of running is not something that we
       | remember well enough to model. We can verify that sensation, but
       | not recreate it. An enormous amount of computation is offloaded
       | to the world.
        
         | alisonkisk wrote:
         | More likely it's because your body is semi paralyzed in sleep,
         | so your dreaming brain notices that your legs aren't moving.
        
         | simion314 wrote:
         | My assumption why in my dreams running feels hard like your
         | legs are made of led is because of the paralysis we suffer when
         | dreaming. Like I want to run but some subconscious things is
         | signaling that your legs are blocked so I get this sensation.(I
         | had similar experience with attempting to open my eyes n dreams
         | and feeling that they are glued or hard to open/keep them open)
        
         | leksak wrote:
         | I run in dreams. Good and bad. One of my favourite dreams start
         | with me running, and it crescendos towards a feeling of
         | effortlessness. The ease of my stride becomes complete, rarely
         | and barely do I have to touch the ground to continue propelling
         | myself forward. The few times that I do have to make ground
         | contact it is as if my forefoot merely licks the ground and I
         | experience something akin to almost-flight.
         | 
         | It is not as if I'm weightless as much as having an
         | unbelievably elastic Achilles tendon that allows me to bound
         | ahead, completely and utterly free. With nothing to impede me.
         | 
         | In nightmares, if I have to run, I'm not as swift.
        
           | YeGoblynQueenne wrote:
           | Interesting. When I have one of those dreams I start running
           | on all fours. Which is weird because I could never run like
           | that in real life. Although I tried to repeat the movement
           | when I was in the sea, once, and it kiind of worked, in that
           | I could propel myself forward, except I had to be underwater.
           | 
           | Now that I think of it, I've never had a dream where I can't
           | _swim_ and I dream of swimming very often.
        
             | leksak wrote:
             | Maybe you could learn. Animal locomotion is pretty big on
             | YouTube.
        
         | ddlutz wrote:
         | Interesting I run in my dreams quite often. I didn't know some
         | people couldn't. However in my dreams I can't really punch, all
         | punches feel like they have no "weight" to them if that makes
         | sense.
        
       | DoreenMichele wrote:
       | _Herr said the AMI patients have felt less pain in their residual
       | limbs, and their limbs don't atrophy, as is typical after a
       | standard amputation, resulting in a poor fit and pain when using
       | a prosthesis._
       | 
       | So this is a really significant step forward with immediate
       | important benefits. "Use it or lose it." Muscle function is
       | preserved so the stump isn't simply rotting. It still has muscle
       | function which is essential to preserving vitality.
       | 
       | Coincidentally, I happened to trip across this House MD clip
       | about phantom pain recently:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIMa6G6EmC8
       | 
       | It reminded me of seeing this on HN:
       | 
       |  _The Mirror Man: Treating Phantom Limb Pain With a Simple
       | Technology_
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8157932
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-18 23:00 UTC)