[HN Gopher] Paradise lost: The rise and ruin of Couchsurfing.com ___________________________________________________________________ Paradise lost: The rise and ruin of Couchsurfing.com Author : jakobgreenfeld Score : 214 points Date : 2021-09-19 11:48 UTC (11 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.inputmag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.inputmag.com) | franze wrote: | A friend of mine, she used to travel a lot, used it as a dating | app. | | She said better as Tinder, more transparency and in the worst | case still a comfy couch. She met her husband via it. | inglor_cz wrote: | I can definitely see the mechanism. On Tinder, people lie about | themselves to make themselves more attractive. Couchsurfing | info will likely be more honest. | blunte wrote: | One of my hosts did the same. She was more casual about it. | | But I also heard from people how they hated when guests would | show up and start acting like it was for dating. So many | profiles would explicitly state that they were not looking for | dates. | k__ wrote: | Ah, so this really worked? What was the social contract here? | blunte wrote: | I think hosts learned to post very clearly if they were not | looking for dates. That way potential guests would not | misunderstand acceptance (for a place to stay) as also | being a potential for romance. I saw plenty of host | profiles that were very clear on their disinterest in | romance. I did not see any profiles that said "looking for | dates", as I'm sure that would not have worked out well... | imagine the emailed photos they would receive... | | But in her case, she was super alpha female (gay), and I | _think_ she had an eye for people who would be receptive to | that. But she was also very cool, so I'm sure if she didn't | get the right vibe she wouldn't push something that would | become awkward. | | From my background, I wouldn't have advised single women to | host men. But two of the people who hosted me were single | women, so I guess they were just more comfortable (or | perhaps Swiss people are less accustomed to bad behaviors? | poorjohnmacafee wrote: | Well "dating app" is a bit of a euphemism here for no strings | attached sexual encounters since will be leaving soon, isn't | it? Met guys who hosted primarily just for "easy hook ups", and | am sure many woman enjoyed it for same reason. Nature of travel | for most 20-somethings anyways. | xapata wrote: | That's what ruined it for me. Some time after AirBnB started, | no one wanted to host my girlfriend and me as a pair. It | seemed like all the people who just wanted to host travelers | left for AirBnB and only the hookup-seekers remained. | purple_ferret wrote: | >more transparency | | Really...I always heard it was terrible for guys because people | only wanted female guests, women because it probably meant they | weren't interested in sex, men because it meant maybe they | might get laid. | | The possibility of romance never really seemed like a | transparent implication to me. | nateberkopec wrote: | Airbnb ruined Couchsurfing because it changed social expectations | around hosting strangers at your house. Before Airbnb, no one | really even thought people would pay for the privilege to sleep | on your couch or your spare bedroom. But once Airbnb started | getting popular, I think a lot of hosts on CS were thinking well, | this is neat, but I could get paid doing this. And a lot of CS | guests became refugees from Airbnb thinking "well, if Airbnb | wants me to pay for this, why do I go to CS and get it for free?" | | I CS'd only once, in Ghana in 2011. It was great, but I was too | late for the trend, it died pretty shortly after. | glandium wrote: | I can't tell about the US, but paying money to sleep in spare | bedrooms was a thing in Europe well before Airbnb. | xapata wrote: | I was an avid Couchsurfer and early AirBnB host. Initially | AirBnB had a vibe very similar to Couchsurfing. Both seemed to | lose the personal touch as they became larger networks. Money | exchange is highly influential as well, but I don't think we | can cross off network scale from the causes. | [deleted] | carlsborg wrote: | The social proof that a couch surfing reference brought was | second to none. Each one boils down to this "I, a stranger, | stayed for a few nights in this other strangers home for free, | and they were good human beings". That social proof carried to | any part of the globe you visited. | | I cannot think of an internet app that brought people together in | a more meaningful and wholesome way at scale. | | It was great while it lasted. | jessriedel wrote: | I agree it's not the same, but AirBnB profiles with a long list | of positive ratings as a guest play a similar role. "This | person slept under my roof, acted well, and treated my home | with respect". When I advertised my apartment for a sublet on | Craigslist, I received a couple AirBnB profiles and considered | them pretty compelling as references. I ended up subletting to | one of those people, and they were great. | robocat wrote: | Does AirBnB provide a "super-guest" filter, or equivalent so | that you can brainlessly and reliably filter for suitable | guests? | | I would host independently minded guests that don't want/need | hand-holding, and guests that are vetted for being socially | respectful (tidy, no 3AM drunks, etcetera). My property is | tobacco and alcohol free, which surprises friends, so I can | imagine strangers being disrespectful. | | Do trustroots.org or movingworlds.org provide filtering? I | really never want to have to trawl through reviews, because I | find it wasteful and also I think reveiwers tend to avoid | writing anything truthfully negative (allusions and omissions | might occur, but are not always obvious). | dkersten wrote: | > That social proof carried to any part of the globe you | visited. | | > I cannot think of an internet app that brought people | together in a more meaningful and wholesome way at scale. | | It also carried over to friendships. For a few short months, I | was one of the most active hosts in my city (mainly because we | had a house with lots of space and all of my housemates were | couchsurfers), until the landlord wanted to sell and we had to | move. After that, when I could no longer host, couchsurfers | were still my primary social group and we met up multiple times | a week to hang out, party or do activities together. I miss | those days. I also know at least three people who met their | spouses through couchsurfing. | | On the other hand, my Airbnb experience was that of a cheaper | hotel/rented accommodation, with no new friends, no social | aspect, just a place to stay in exchange for money. | marricks wrote: | It seems like for any tech company to be successful and | sustainable it has to destroy the openness and community it | was born from. I discovered couch surfing right as my | wandering days came to a close and I feel I sorely missed | out. | cainxinth wrote: | Pareto principle. 80% of people are decent human beings, but | the 20% that aren't cause 80% of the problems. | im3w1l wrote: | If only we had some kind of "credit score" but for social | things.. | pope_meat wrote: | And it should be algorithmically driven with all sorts of | fun edge cases and poor maintenance. | | Edit: oh, and obviously closed source, and have it's entire | db leak about once a year due to excellent security. | smnplk wrote: | Fei Chang You Qu ,Qing Gao Su Geng Duo | ajsnigrutin wrote: | Nah... surely there's no way that software could mess | up... people have all kinds of strange ideas, like | traffic cameras looking for people using phones, and tag | a guy scratching his head.... this surely is impossible | to happen in real life with modern software. | kragen wrote: | On Couchsurfing we did. The problem was that it was | ultimately under the control of a small group of people, | and they sold out. | prashantsengar wrote: | Hello from China | Igelau wrote: | The old Accidental Black Mirror. | TeMPOraL wrote: | I'm surprised /r/UnexpectedBlackMirror doesn't exist yet. | amelius wrote: | The episode focused only on the downsides of this idea, | not the upsides. And of course they chose the worst | possible implementation to make the plot more juicy. With | this attitude you can make any technology look bad. | | If 20% of people cause 80% of the trouble and this idea | fixes that, then perhaps there is some merit in the idea | even if you consider the downsides. | jl6 wrote: | 20% of people are not decent human beings? Harsh. | bogwog wrote: | Have you met people? | omginternets wrote: | Is one person out of five that you meet causing trouble? | SuoDuanDao wrote: | Keep in mind, out of 25 people, one is causing 64% of the | problems while the worst four besides that one are | responsible for just an additional 16%. | a1369209993 wrote: | > out of 25 people, one is causing 64% of the problems | while the worst four besides that one are responsible for | just an additional 16% | | Also, if you have any influence over which 20 people you | spend time with, they're probably the 20 out of 25 who | are _not_ those five. | seattle_spring wrote: | If driving on a highway is any indication, then yes | isbvhodnvemrwvn wrote: | People who are shit are probably excluded from many | social circles, so I don't think that's a great | indicator. | [deleted] | SMAAART wrote: | Price's law: the square root of the population produces 50% | of the trouble. | | Apply that to the US (328.2 million people) and we have that | 18,116 individuals are responsible for 50% of problems. | | Mic drop | ermir wrote: | And the square root of that is 135, which causes 25% of the | total trouble. If we could only find these people and get | rid of them, we'd have paradise on Earth! | | And that's how genocides start. | chx wrote: | Wait, what? Price's Law. The square root of the number of | people in a domain do 50% of the work. | | Nothing about trouble. | TeMPOraL wrote: | Causing trouble is work, of sorts. | | But perhaps it would be clearer if restated as, "50% of | impact in a domain can be attributed to square root the | number of people in that domain". | anonporridge wrote: | Could also be applied to community discussion, both | online and in meatspace. | | There is an extreme minority of people who comment and | up/down vote who drive the discussion of the whole. The | 99% rarely participate and just go along for the ride. | hkt wrote: | ..are there 18,116 billionaires and near-billionaires? | nathanvanfleet wrote: | Uhhhhhhhh... the golden ratio. | snek_case wrote: | Totally and like... problems are fractal in nature, you | have problems within problems within problems! | Torwald wrote: | This was also the success secret of the early church. The | apostles and shepherds who visited believers in other cities | brought with them such social proof in the form of a written | letter. | wins32767 wrote: | That was very standard in the Roman empire at the time. | Formalized patronage relationships were one of the core | social organizing principles and given the distances, a | letter from your patron to one of their contacts was _the_ | mechanism for social proof. | chagaif wrote: | I am very much still living this, Couchsurfing got more | difficult to use and a lot of people don't use it because of | the so called "pay wall" but luckily alternatives are there and | will hopefully with more posts like this get more traction... I | like Trustroots most | zwayhowder wrote: | It was well thought out too, hard to spam with fake comments | etc. | | My family hosted people for a year or two and we were never | empty. The appeal of a family home with a private room that had | dozens of reviews from well travelled guests was so | overwhelming people would take an air mattress in my study if | the private room was taken by others. We regularly had multiple | groups of people staying. Our record was 11 which included 6 | German 19yr olds who had a campervan but wanted access to a | shower after a week in the Australian summer together. | | We also were contacted by one person who was trapped in one of | those "We paid for your travel here so we've confiscated your | passport and you work in our shop until we decide you've paid | your debt" situations. We gave her the comfort to know she had | a place to stay and then a friend and I went round to collect | her, he was accidently still wearing his police uniform from | work, so unsurprisingly we recovered her passport quite | quickly. | | It was a truly great site at that time, I stayed in a few | places using it, but switched to AirBnB when I could no longer | find places to stay in the cities I needed to visit. | amelius wrote: | > It was well thought out too, hard to spam with fake | comments etc. | | Curious, what techniques did they use for that? | Beldin wrote: | > _he was accidently still wearing his police uniform_ | | Hear, hear, fine sirs! | Razengan wrote: | Couchsurfing is my go-to case to present in favor of making all | in-app purchases via Apple instead of third-party payment | processors. | | So they had a one-time "verification fee" of around $60-$100 (I | think it varied by region or something) and a promise that we | would never have to pay anything again. | | Some time later they started charging a monthly "COVID fee" or | something (not much but also varying by region) but unless you | paid that, you were suddenly _unable to access anything on your | account AT ALL._ | | I hadn't used Couchsurfing in a while so when I logged in after | that update, it was as if my account had been hijacked and | ransomed; people couldn't even delete their profiles (along with | the info visible to the public) until they paid (again.) | | You might say that a few bucks isn't a big deal, but if these | fees were paid via Apple's IAP system, Apple would have given me | a refund without question like they do with all other crap | services, whereas Couchsurfing has yet to even respond to my | requests for a refund. | peterburkimsher wrote: | Previous discussion: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23211495 | | The CouchSurfing community was wonderful, as I discovered from my | first experience surfing in Irkutsk in 2009, to hosting in Japan | in 2012, and co-hosting a meetup in Kaohsiung from 2016-2018. | Some of the most dynamic and fascinating people had profiles, and | the level of trust in strangers was immense. In my case it | started largely because I had no other option, but it became a | joy to pay it forward, and see how people worked together for the | greater good. | | Where is the community now? Many people, myself included, are | still affected by lockdowns and border closures. Despite that, in | the past year, BeWelcome has grown from 135,571 members to | 167,073 members. We know we need a mobile app and an API, but | it's been difficult for committed developers to get involved. | | https://bewelcome.org/about/stats | | These days I host a weekly online meetup at 23:00 New Zealand | time every Thursday night. Welcome to come and hang out if you'd | like! | | https://meet.jit.si/BeWelcome-Chat_4MembersVolunteers | | https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=2193733,1673820,266... | blunte wrote: | I used CS in 2008 in Switzerland, and it was a great experience. | The people I met and stayed with were all nice and friendly (even | if sometimes a bit quirky). | | What shocked me was that even in the town of Bern, which is not a | huge city, there were over a hundred people on CS who were | advertising their couches or spare rooms for guests. | | I loved the two week experience. It made me feel good about | people. It also made the world seem smaller and more accessible. | | A couple of years later I hosted a couple of teen brothers who | were long boarding across the US. They were kind, goofy, and | super appreciative. Again, a great experience. | | I did read of some bad experiences, but the review system did | seem to work pretty well for building reputation. | | If CS had started charging $10/year, I think a lot of users would | have paid it. That's not much, and maybe not enough to fund it, | but perhaps it would have postponed the bad changes. | cdrini wrote: | Very well written and researched article. What an interesting | deep dive into a fascinating corner of internet culture! | plantain wrote: | Couchsurfing.com used to be a gem, I hosted a number of people so | far removed from my bubble and had a great time with them. I hope | a viable successor appears. | rapnie wrote: | Open Hospitality Network just started. | | https://openhospitality.network | rapnie wrote: | FYI they created their own submission here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28587228 | atatatat wrote: | Their "Whose involved?" is a who's who of projects in the | space. | thomasahle wrote: | Right now a lot of alternatives: Couchers.org, BeWelcome.org, | Trustroots.org | k__ wrote: | I knew a guy who said he used CS mainly for hookups. | | Is this really a thing? | fxtentacle wrote: | 10 years ago, there was a lot of traveling hippies on CS. We (4 | guys) had an appartement in the city center of a touristic town | and we did have some female visitors that quite openly talked | about how they like the concept of free love and sampling for | biological compatibility before committing to a relationship. | That said, I don't think any of us ever took any of them up on | the offer. That openness tends to come with certain hygiene and | style choices. | phreeza wrote: | WarmShowers still seems to work very well, with a spirit similar | to the original CouchSurfing, though it is restricted to | cyclists. | chagaif wrote: | Warmshowers Uncensored is Tracking censorious actions taken by | Warmshowers. https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2111860# | Raed667 wrote: | I remember trying to see what it was like but then you have to | pay in order just to see how the platform works. It seemed very | hostile to new users and people tempted by the idea. | phreeza wrote: | Probably at least partly a feature, to ensure a minimum level | of commitment from members? My word of mouth knowledge of how | well it works is good enough that I would pay without | hesitation if I needed it. | Raed667 wrote: | If I'm trying this idea for the first time. I'd like to | know if my planned routes have potential places on WS or am | I just paying for a "your search has 0 results" page. | phreeza wrote: | I just checked with the guy who recommended it to me and | he said when he used it, it was free. Website also seems | to confirm that. Not sure what changed when? | rootsudo wrote: | I paid for it earlier this year and haven't yet used it | but it seems to be really popular in PNW (where I go | biking.) | phreeza wrote: | It seems the thing you need to pay for is the app, it's | free to use on the web? | rootsudo wrote: | Nope, signed up on the web - wouldn't let me see hosts | info otherwise. | xoa wrote: | A note for those talking about it going non-free downthread, | that's apparently fairly recent and a sad example of central | board control going closed behavior. From | https://openhospitality.network: | | > _Open Alternative to WarmShowers.org - contributors to the | community-built WarmShowers Android app, first released in | 2012, before any WS board existed (2015), with which the | community has grown, and whose access was cut off after WS | board closed backend code (ca. 2017) and released a new paid | app (2020), effectively excluding from the community members | who access the platform from mobile devices only and for whom | the fee for the new app is unaffordable (i.a. long-distance | bike tourers and hosts from countries with less developed | infrastructure). The devs and other community members made | previously many attempts to inform the board about the | situation._ | | I haven't dug into the links and it doesn't seem to have been | discussed on HN before, but it sounds like an unfortunately | typical story. Of course, with each time that happens | communities learn a bit about how to react differently going | forward which I hope will bear fruit. | breton wrote: | The only time I touched cs was in 2014, when my wife suggested to | find a place via it and registered a female profile. 100% of the | profiles looking at her were male and like from a dating site ad. | There also was an unwanted email spam about who she could stay | with - also very dating-site-like. Airbnb felt way more | friendlier and safer. | dkersten wrote: | Oof, that's rather sad. My experience with it was 2008 and 2009 | and it was very different: very casual, interesting people from | around the world staying with and hanging out with each other. | It was very pleasant and was the focal point of my social life | during that time, until I moved to a town without a presence | that was too far away from any hub area. And then I heard it | declined... which is I guess where your experience comes in. | That's very sad. | rootsudo wrote: | I fear I'm probably part of the problem, or I was too "late." | | I'm on the younger end, and around 2014 is when I was in my early | 20's and rather much do airbnb vs couchsurfing because the | reviews and the paywall was a compliment to allowing strangers | stay in my place (alongside a fake/marketing fluff guarantee | piece.) So I joined airbnb and used that, because couchsurfing | was on the way out. | | Early 00's Couchsurfing was a bit unregulated, and many people | here forgot to mention the downsides - sexual assaults, thefts | and such, which is not to say they didn't happen on airbnb or | hotels, but the optics were never handled properly because | "stranger, staying on couch, assaulted host" always catches | headlines. | | Plus comparing an airbnb to an couch vs a hotel, airbnbs won , | you had a room for $20-40 a night, no fees - sometimes even less. | | Now, there's room for another disruption, airbnb is highly not as | efficient anymore for customer experience on the low end as | they're moving to high end experiences, vrbo is kinda doing it's | own thing and hotels are hotels. | | Or maybe the high price of airbnbs are a reflection of how in | demand and efficient all this actually is. | enriquto wrote: | There's Pasporta Servo, still going strong since way before | couchsurfing was a thing. You need a moderate amount of | implication, which acts as a sort of filter for people who only | want to goof around. This can be either a good or a bad thing. | jrochkind1 wrote: | "implication"? | kingofpandora wrote: | Autocorrect for Esperanto I guess. | j1elo wrote: | Most likely it's a false friend, from a very similar Spanish | word that means "commitment" | enriquto wrote: | My mistake exactly. | | Now I realize with horror that I've been misusing this word | all my life. | syntaxfree wrote: | ?Cual? | artur_makly wrote: | i met my Argentine wife on CH. i hope it has a second life one | day again, as it was one of the most beautiful social experiments | to-date. | slim wrote: | "There really is no similarity between Palantir's business model | and Couchsurfing's business model," | | Ok, but I still can imagine a few ways it could be useful to | intelligence agencies : It's a network of places to stay around | the globe without the need to show your passport or give your | credit card. | xtracto wrote: | I tried to use it once around 2005 while studying my PhD in the | UK. I needed to stay in London for a couple of days but was | rejected and couldn't find a bed. I ended up going into a Hostel | (hostelworld) at that time. It didn't work for me (maybe because | of my nationality?). | kragen wrote: | I guess you're Mexican? From growing up there, I know the US | has pervasive racism against Mexicans; what's the UK attitude | like? | poetaster wrote: | I learned to couch surf in the 1980s, west coast Canada, US and | Europe. Convivial people in the arts, music and so. Even surfed a | barn couch in southern france. Biking and hiking was sometimes a | common denominator. Internet optional. | ithinkso wrote: | Ah, couchsurfing. It truly was a paradise and a fantastic | community. I have a lot of fond memories when I would just | hitchhike whole summer throughout europe and beyond. Meeting all | sort of people with every background imaginable. I don't think | there is a way for me to recreate that kind of freedom anymore. | And the community was really trusting to the point of | ridiculousness - I remember one host in Italy had some emergency | and had to go out of town for a day while I was about to appear | and he just texted me where he left the keys lol | dgan wrote: | Couchsurfing was too intrusive for me when i tried. It required | somewhat nice and approchable picture of myself, with some | interesting story to put on my profile This was just too much | asked. Compare that to "pay NEUR, you can stay M nights" I picked | second every time. | vvpan wrote: | Well, couchsurfing is a community meets social network, it's | hard not to be "intrusive". | theairscout wrote: | To be fair, that is, an small interesting story, IMHO, not much | to ask for a stranger to open their place to another stranger. | In the good old times, an story was not enough, you had to | describe much more of yourself to help people trust you. That | what CS did, created a global trusting metric. The free nights | (that is exactly the symptom of not understanding the CS | concept) on someone place was just part of the whole thing. The | connections were some of the main benefits and those were | incomparable. Or course, CS was not for everybody, you needed | to be wired in certain way to use and to enjoy it, but f you | did, there was nothing like it and it was as good as travelling | gets. | dgan wrote: | Everything is correct what you said. I am not cricizing CS, | despite how my parent comment looks, I am just saying I | clearly wasn't the target audience | barcoder wrote: | The first app I'd fire up when arriving in a new city was the CS | app. | | I'd announce myself in the activities section - ie. I want walk | around the city. A few mins later I'd have a group of people | wanting to meet up and explore. | | Instant friends. It was wonderful! | CGamesPlay wrote: | Couchsurfing Hangouts was also a great way for me to meet | people in new cities. Is there anything aiming to replace that | aspect of the site now? | nicbou wrote: | It's a lot less active, but it still works. I have never | found a replacement for it. | xapata wrote: | Same. I traveled for work, so I didn't need lodging. I needed | instant friends, and CS provided. | xapata wrote: | In hindsight, I had no idea how _new_ the website was when I | joined Couchsurfing in 2005. Now I understand why the people I | met were all so enthusiastic about the grand hospitality | experiment -- we were the early adopters. | EGreg wrote: | Is there a good alternative? | | Does couchsurfing still work WELL if you're willing to pay | membership fees? | dopidopHN wrote: | I think the community is kinda broken. | EGreg wrote: | Can I reliably get a couch in most countries where the owner | won't try to rape, kidnap or rob me? | | Then it's good enough for me | [deleted] | carlsborg wrote: | Membership fees was a horrible idea. They should have done a | Wikipedia style "We need to pay to keep the lights on.. make a | donation" and maybe offered a badge in return. | thomasahle wrote: | It's also strange they made the paywall for hosts and | travelers the same. Who wants to pay to host other people? | xapata wrote: | The same people that wanted to host in the first place. | When I was really into Couchsurfing, my girlfriend and I | searched for apartments that made it easy to host, the same | way that people seek ways to host via AirBnB. | | I enjoyed hearing stories from travelers, and showing them | around town. | bakuninsbart wrote: | I didn't know about the changes but actually wanted to | reactivate my CS account after a couple years of absence. | Now that the travel restrictions are mostly gone and me | and my girlfriend finally have a flat with a nice living | room I wanted to give something forward. | | But I'm not gonna pay for it to an at this point frankly | dubious middleman. | thomasahle wrote: | I guess some people may still want to host. At least if | the community is still as good as when I used to host. | Personally I'm sceptical that it is, and not going to pay | to find out. I'd rather support the newcomers on | Couchers.org and the like. | Arubis wrote: | Probably? There may be a smaller one available for you. | | Couchsurfing basically needs three things: a way to establish | trust (Airbnb accomplishes this by appealing to a central | authority), a demographic that's able and interested in | participating, and a way for folks to connect. Of these, trust | is probably the hardest. What, in your own life, might enable | this? | | In my own experience, the inbuilt trust between returned Peace | Corps volunteers (from an American long-term international | service organization) stemming from shared experience led to | its own internal couchsurfing culture that was alive and well | when I last checked (pre-pandemic). What other affinity groups | might work? Work, school, religious groups, hobbies, music? Are | you a part of one, or could you be? | Nimitz14 wrote: | I honestly don't think the paywall was such a bad idea. The | barrier to entry was too easy, there were too many people on the | platform who had no intention of hosting and were just looking | for a free place to stay. The very small contribution at least | ensures some level of commitment. | thomasahle wrote: | I don't think you're getting more hosts this way though. | | I was trying to set up my new place for hosting when I ran into | the paywall. Didn't want that. Now I'm hosting on Couchers.org | instead. | dkersten wrote: | When I hosted (2008), we were very active hosts that summer and | we basically required people to write personalised messages | telling us who they are and why they like the sound of staying | with us specifically. We got a lot of generic copy and paste | messages and we ignored them, since we got so many messages. | For about 3 months, we were hosting people almost every single | day, often multiple people (and the most at once was 12, for a | weekend while there was an event on). | | This worked very well and the only "bad" experience we ever had | was one of those 12 people that stayed the weekend of that | event was.. harmless, but a bit unpleasant and odd, and that | was because we relaxed our vetting a small bit for that event. | | And honestly, I don't know if I would have paid for an account | at that time, as an active host. I got into it because my | housemates were into it and when we were planning on moving in | together, we discussed it. If it had cost money to join, I | can't imagine we would have bothered, certainly not all of 5 of | us. | | With that said, nowadays, I think some barrier to entry would | make me feel more comfortable with it. Back then, in my early | twenties, I was a bit more relaxed about sharing my personal | space, I guess. | avereveard wrote: | It isn't a bad idea per se, but it was contrary to everything | many vocal coachsurfers stood for. It was a movement as much as | a community, I knew lot of hosts that were mad about it because | they felt they were monetizing not the service, but the trust | network people built therein. | kragen wrote: | The people who put up the paywall also had no intention of | hosting; they were just looking for free money. They're the | same kind of people you're complaining about, just orders of | magnitude worse. | em-bee wrote: | does it really? wouldn't paying lead to more entitlement from | surfers? | goatsecxkirk wrote: | I couchsurfed in the US and Australia 2011 to 2013 and had a lot | of amazing experiences. It had a profound impact on how I view | the world and people. Here's a blog from the time of the buyout | that I think some people might find interesting | | https://blog.rplasil.name/2016/02/the-fall-of-couchsurfing-a... | vvpan wrote: | I have been pretty heavily involved with couchsurfing for years | to the extent that I barely spend time with anybody who I did not | directly or indirectly meet through couchsurfing. The well- | traveled curious misfit persona I associate with the network | works great for me. I have met the most curious personalities, | forged strong relationships with people in other parts of the | world, and I think I have experienced more good-will and | generosity than most people ever will. | | It really seemed couchsurfing.com became a victim of it's on | success beyond whatever happened behind the stage. Over the years | the number of popular articles that "advertised" it as a way to | either have sex or just a free place to crash has brought | attention that was detrimental to the experience. The number of | stupid "hey bro, me and my buddy need a place to crash" requests | went up significantly. This is what happens with any community. | | But the important thing is that couchsurfing.com is just a | website, it does not even matter so much. There are millions of | people out there who are adventurous and out to meet people and | those have not gone away. Couchsurfing meetups still happen. | Couchcrashes (big long get-togethers in random cities of the | world explcitly affiliated with couchsurfing.com) still happen. | Airbnb is easier, but couchsurfing to a large extent was not | about a place to stay - it is about connecting with the place you | went to and people who lived there. (A good example of what doors | couchsurfing might open seems to be "Couchsurfing in Iran: | Revealing a Hidden World", but it's still on my to-read list) | Back in the day you could always break that connect-with-people | contract to a certain extent and it was not unwelcome, but as | more people flooded the platform it became a much rarer paradigm. | | Whatever happens I hope the word couchsurfing gets decoupled from | the the website. I still travel and hop hostels and the target | audience of couchsurfing has never ceased to exist. With more | remote work it has perhaps grown? What has happened to | couchsurfing.com happens to any online community. Growth entails | erosion of value. Partly, why I am actually not apposed to light | gate-keeping of a paywall. In any case, I welcome the next stage. | And I am glad the article ends on a list of lesser-known | alternatives (contributors to some of which commented in this | thread!). Couchsurfing is not couchsurfing.com and it is not dead | it is just looking for new forms. | lucas_codes wrote: | I'm a volunteer dev for https://couchers.org which was started in | response to the Couchsurfing paywall and mentioned in this | article. It's steadily growing in both users and features, and is | open source and non-profit. | | BeWelcome is similarly open-source and non profit, which I'd also | recommend as a CS alternative (although they have a somewhat | different vision to Couchers and CS). | abyssin wrote: | Trustroots has to be mentioned too. It appeared as a reaction | to the rigidity of how things were managed at BeWelcome. | chagaif wrote: | A few developers from different HospEx (hospitality exchange) | platforms (Trustroots, WarmShowers Android app devs, BeWelcome) | started an attempt to federate the HospEx world. | | Mariha (@mariha:matrix.org) was contributing for Warm Showers | Android App and with https://warmshowers.bike/ happening she kind | of kick-started the whole project. | | We got funding recently from https://ngi.eu and with that we | start to work for the next generation internet. | | We would love to revive the spirit of early Couchsurfing and Warm | Showers | | https://openhospitality.network | fabianhjr wrote: | Besides federation, are you setting up as platform | cooperatives? (Info: https://platform.coop/, Example: | https://fairbnb.coop/ ) | chagaif wrote: | I submitted this to HN so if anyone prefers a discussion here | rather than on Matrix/Telegram feel free to comment there | Here's the link to the submission: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28587228 | kragen wrote: | What's the current spirit like? I've been not participating in | CS2 for the last decade or so. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-19 23:00 UTC)