[HN Gopher] Text entered into Windows' Run dialogue gets sent to...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Text entered into Windows' Run dialogue gets sent to Microsoft's
       telemetry
        
       Author : NKosmatos
       Score  : 128 points
       Date   : 2021-09-20 20:20 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (twitter.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
        
       | musicale wrote:
       | Helpful for passwords and other information you might want to
       | share.
        
       | p1necone wrote:
       | So, what's everyone's favorite desktop/workstation Linux distro
       | as of 2021?
       | 
       | Edit: Anyone tried using NixOS as a desktop OS? I like the idea
       | of scripting my setup.
        
         | messo wrote:
         | I'm a long time arch user, but recently installed the latest
         | Fedora on an old lenovo x220 an was impress by how polished it
         | is and how fast it runs! Flatpaks makes it super easy to
         | install the latest version of both free and non-free software,
         | which always was a pain to acomplish on Fedora a couple of
         | years ago.
         | 
         | Fedora may be the best options for new linux users who do not
         | want to customize everything, but just wants a clean, fast and
         | polished "works-out-of-the-box" experience.
         | 
         | I'll keep my higly cusomized arch (sway) install for my
         | programming needs for now, but will probably choose Fedora for
         | my "personal" laptop where I do some light video and photo
         | editing.
        
         | amanzi wrote:
         | Four replies so far, all different. I'll add a fifth: Pop_OS!
         | 
         | Edit - now 9 replies, all different. Great to see so much
         | choice!
        
         | boardwaalk wrote:
         | I'm using ArchLinux with MATE. It pretty much got out of my way
         | and I don't even think about it...
        
         | trelane wrote:
         | Pop has been pretty good on my gaming PC (is a Thelio, so
         | probably not coincidence. :)
         | 
         | Really depends on what you want. (I run Gentoo otherwise, but
         | that's probably not everyone's preference. ;)
        
         | Shadonototra wrote:
         | manjaro with XFCE +
         | https://github.com/davekeogh/xfce4-docklike-plugin (check the
         | original repo for the screenshots)
        
         | vorpalhex wrote:
         | I've been using ElementaryOS, coming from MacOS. Have to
         | install a package to be able to tweak it and replaced the file
         | manager with nautilus, otherwise fine.
        
         | mistrial9 wrote:
         | LUbuntu currently
        
         | outworlder wrote:
         | > Anyone tried using NixOS as a desktop OS?
         | 
         | Yes! Works great actually.
         | 
         | Even running Windows-based games on Steam with Proton. All my
         | hardware worked out of the box(including my Wifi6 module) -
         | only tweaking I had to do was for Vulkan with my GPU. Even
         | then, not that difficult and instructions are in their wiki.
         | 
         | I have little reason to run Windows now. Only software I really
         | miss is Fusion 360.
        
         | mappu wrote:
         | Debian with KDE
         | 
         | It's a major distro with excellent security support, it's
         | completely non-commercial, and KDE has a traditional GUI layout
         | with all the optional trimmings (snap to window edges,
         | thumbnail previews in taskbar etc)
        
         | iceychris wrote:
         | I'm using NixOS with i3 as my daily driver, can recommend.
        
         | hpoe wrote:
         | Ubuntu with i3.
        
         | LeoPanthera wrote:
         | I love how many different answers there are to this.
         | 
         | I run openSUSE (with KDE) pretty much for one reason - the
         | repos available are completely comprehensive. They have
         | everything I ever need in them, even some pretty obscure stuff,
         | and because it's a rolling distro everything is up to date.
         | 
         | The amazing YaST graphical configuration tool is a nice bonus.
        
         | brian-armstrong wrote:
         | Mint with XFCE is quite nice
        
         | mithusingh32 wrote:
         | Regolith-linux
         | 
         | It's a ubuntu based with a i3 desktop manager but with newer
         | perfect configurations out of the box.
        
           | smoldesu wrote:
           | +1 for this, _particularly_ if you 've never tried i3 but
           | still want to know what the workflow feels like. I run
           | Regolith on my homelab and it works like a charm!
        
       | AA-BA-94-2A-56 wrote:
       | Another mail in the coffin. Why should I use Windows, when Linux
       | is catching up and not using these horrific anti-patterns?
        
       | hypothesis wrote:
       | What's interesting is the fact that telemetry is a feature at
       | this point (how old is Windows 10?) and you can't win a fight
       | against a core OS feature. Why are people still trying to fight
       | this?
        
         | blibble wrote:
         | I like Windows 10
         | 
         | it having un-disablable telemetry and mandatory updates finally
         | made me switch to Linux everywhere
         | 
         | otherwise it's no longer My Computer... it's Satya's
        
         | trangus_1985 wrote:
         | You've always been able to turn it off with group policy and
         | disabling the reporting service. It still bugs me, on
         | principle, that you can't easily disable it even on the Pro
         | edition.
        
           | hypothesis wrote:
           | That's like trying to disable all those similar things in
           | Firefox. But you can't really, not unless you stop updating
           | it, because you'll miss something at some point. And that's
           | not even an 'evil corp' we're talking here.
        
             | trangus_1985 wrote:
             | I've had it disabled for years, without it reporting home.
             | So far, Microsoft seems to respect group policy and
             | disabled services on Pro edition.
        
               | gruez wrote:
               | >So far, Microsoft seems to respect group policy on Pro
               | edition
               | 
               | the group policy description explicitly says it does not
               | respect it unless you're using enterprise or education.
               | 
               | > [...]
               | 
               | >If you enable this setting, you can decide what level of
               | diagnostic data to send to Microsoft, including:
               | 
               | >- 0 (Security). Sends only a minimal amount of data to
               | Microsoft, required to help keep Windows secure. Windows
               | security components, such as the Malicious Software
               | Removal Tool (MSRT) and Windows Defender may send data to
               | Microsoft at this level, if enabled. Setting a value of 0
               | applies to devices running Enterprise, Education, IoT, or
               | Windows Server editions only. Setting a value of 0 for
               | other editions is equivalent to setting a value of 1.
               | 
               | >- 1 (Basic). Sends the same data as a value of 0, plus a
               | very limited amount of diagnostic data, such as basic
               | device info, quality-related data, and app compatibility
               | info. Note that setting values of 0 or 1 will degrade
               | certain experiences on the device.
               | 
               | > [...]
               | 
               | Disabling the relevant service might stop it regardless,
               | but it's definitely not the group policy.
        
         | hammyhavoc wrote:
         | Because a lot of people are forced to use Windows 10 and for
         | whatever reason cannot use a Linux distro even with Looking
         | Glass?
        
           | hypothesis wrote:
           | Are we talking about 'at work' scenario? Which is probably
           | fine, because that's a business decision.
           | 
           | It would be prudent not to use company equipment for anything
           | personal anyway.
        
       | jimbob45 wrote:
       | Interestingly, the people least likely to disable Windows
       | telemetry are the people MS is most likely to want to hear from
       | because they're the least capable of solving their own issues in
       | Windows and thus represent the most pressing needs for
       | development to fix.
        
       | gentleman11 wrote:
       | How did the pr people ever spin it so that we call "keyloggers"
       | and "spyware" simple "telemetry" now? Let's call it what it is
        
         | moksly wrote:
         | I'm wonder how it remains legal in the EU. Legislation really
         | needs to step up on these things.
         | 
         | It's an American company that's keeping taps on something like
         | 600 million European citizens. I don't care what sort of
         | "license agreement" it comes with, that's just not ok.
        
           | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
           | Legislation exists, enforcement is what's missing.
        
       | inyorgroove wrote:
       | There are tools for this, don't go alone (block telemetry via
       | hosts file): https://github.com/builtbybel/privatezilla
        
         | inyorgroove wrote:
         | Also, I block MS telemetry hosts on my router's dns server:
         | https://github.com/crazy-max/WindowsSpyBlocker/blob/master/d...
        
       | air7 wrote:
       | One of the relies makes sense to me: it's because the win10
       | search bar is also a web search and this is intended
       | functionality, normal for search bars. they send a new request
       | every time you type a character i assume for predictive search
       | and fast results. you can also see this in bing for sure.
        
         | JacobLinney wrote:
         | search bar != run dialogue
        
         | NobodyNada wrote:
         | This isn't the search bar though, it's the "run" window
         | (Win+R), which has no search functionality and is more-or-less
         | equivalent to typing a command in Command Prompt.
        
           | anigbrowl wrote:
           | It has search functionality. I slightly mistyped something
           | the other day and was mystified to see the correct answer in
           | a mini browser window while Windows itself was failing to
           | match it up with the software I had installed and run every
           | day. You can also just start typing search queries and it
           | will try to launch MS Edge as soon as you hit enter.
        
       | bob1029 wrote:
       | Edit: Deleted my original posting. Getting some pretty hostile
       | vibes on basic attempts to contribute to this thread.
        
         | jaywalk wrote:
         | What does that have to do with the Run dialog?
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | 1970-01-01 wrote:
       | Microsoft is somewhat transparent about it:
       | 
       | Inking, typing, and speech utterance data
       | 
       | This type of Optional diagnostic data includes details about the
       | voice, inking, and typing input features on the device.
       | 
       | Samples of the content you type, write, or dictate on the device.
       | Details about status of transcribing input into text
       | 
       | https://privacy.microsoft.com/en-us/data-collection-Windows
        
       | thesuperbigfrog wrote:
       | "Who controls your computer? Is it you?"
       | 
       | "Either the user controls the software, or the software controls
       | the users":
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/Ag1AKIl_2GM?t=57
        
       | newsbinator wrote:
       | This is actually a huge deal because if others are anything like
       | me, I paste into the run dialog to strip text formatting, before
       | copying it elsewhere.
       | 
       | Haven't used Windows in a decade so not sure if there's a better
       | way now.
        
         | chinathrow wrote:
         | Ctrl-Shift-v in many applications e.g. Word.
        
           | Mesmoria wrote:
           | In many places, but not word (sadly).
        
         | banana_giraffe wrote:
         | No built in better way I know of, but I have
         | ; Type in the clipboard         ^!v::         MyClip =
         | %clipboard%         StringReplace, MyClip, MyClip, `r, , All
         | SendRaw %MyClip%         return
         | 
         | in my AutoHotkey script for a long time now to let me hit Ctrl-
         | Alt-V and have it type in the text of whatever's in the
         | clipboard. (Type instead of paste to get around random
         | situations where the clipboard won't do what I want)
        
         | farkanoid wrote:
         | It makes me happy that others do this too, I make use of pretty
         | much any plaintext field in proximity to strip formatting
        
         | NKosmatos wrote:
         | I use the address bar of the browser to quickly strip
         | formatting :-)
        
           | strombofulous wrote:
           | FYI, chrome/edge have similar behavior in their omnibox.
           | 
           | If you ever find the time, open up fiddler and keep it
           | visible on a second monitor while you browse. You'll be
           | amazed by how much data is sent back to microsoft/Google.
           | 
           | I'm not sure if other chromium browsers also do this, I know
           | ungoogled chromium doesn't.
        
             | thrashh wrote:
             | Shouldn't be surprising if autocomplete results appear
             | immediately after typing in the box.
             | 
             | They didn't magically appear from thin air for sure.
        
           | im3w1l wrote:
           | At least the address bar lets you know it gets uploaded by
           | displaying search autocompletes
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | "Haven't used Windows in a decade so not sure if there's a
         | better way now."
         | 
         | no, not running windows in a decade is still the better way.
         | 
         | only sort of joking. I run windows 7 and haven't upgraded.
        
           | eptcyka wrote:
           | Windows 7 is horribly insecure now. Please reconsider.
        
             | gruez wrote:
             | Normally yes, but you can pirate the extended support
             | updates, which last until 2023.
        
             | userbinator wrote:
             | FUD. MS gathers more information about you than ever.
        
               | eptcyka wrote:
               | Both of those statements can be true.
        
               | userbinator wrote:
               | It's downright fearmongering --- classic MS-style --- to
               | say something is "horribly insecure" when it has has been
               | around for over a decade and all the major bugs have
               | already been found.
               | 
               | Nevermind the fact that everyone is almost always behind
               | a NAT and are basically unreachable for attackers to
               | exploit remotely.
               | 
               | If anything, the _newer_ versions of Windows are
               | "horribly inescure" because they contain so many "unknown
               | unknowns". But that wouldn't fit the narrative MS wants
               | to propagate...
        
               | jfrunyon wrote:
               | > and all the major bugs have already been found
               | 
               | Excuse me while I die of laughter.
               | 
               | People are still finding bugs which existed in _XP_.
               | Which was supported for 12 years and was released 20
               | years ago.
               | 
               | 7 was supported for 11 years and was released 12 years
               | ago.
               | 
               | > Nevermind the fact that everyone is almost always
               | behind a NAT and are basically unreachable for attackers
               | to exploit remotely.
               | 
               | Sure, except that the vast majority of malware doesn't
               | come from a remote attack.
        
               | kube-system wrote:
               | Plenty of new CVEs are in code that has been around for
               | decades. For an example recently in the news:
               | https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-
               | guide/vulnerability/CVE-20...
        
               | gruez wrote:
               | > It's downright fearmongering --- classic MS-style ---
               | to say something is "horribly insecure" when it has has
               | been around for over a decade and all the major bugs have
               | already been found.
               | 
               | Have they? We just had printernightmare (CVE-2021-34527)
               | a few months ago. In certain configurations you can even
               | get RCE.
        
               | eptcyka wrote:
               | I wouldn't use an Android phone for anything safety
               | critical if it was more than 6 months behind the latest
               | security patches. Why would it be any different for
               | Windows?
               | 
               | Of course, we can play the asterisk game and expressly
               | state that if the machine is not connected to the
               | internet and not used to browse the web, then it's
               | probably safe. Or if you like browse the web in a VM. I
               | still have to wonder if the patches for these kinds of
               | issues[1] get backported to Windows 7.
               | 
               | As to the appeal for age, I think software ages seafood
               | in terms of security. Just because it's been deployed for
               | years doesn't mean that there aren't vulnerabilities
               | lurking in that code. Although I will concede that as
               | Windows 7 loses users, the payoff for finding a
               | vulnerability will decrease too.
               | 
               | [1]:
               | https://www.sentinelone.com/labs/cve-2021-3438-16-years-
               | in-h...
        
               | spywaregorilla wrote:
               | Have all the insecurities been patched? There's pretty
               | much only downsides to unpatched, known vulnerabilities
               | vs. unknown vulnerabilities with the slight exception
               | that you'd be a little more justified assuming you're
               | safe when you're not. The likelihood of suffering a loss
               | is much higher.
        
             | jlokier wrote:
             | From the article, I'm under the impression Windows 11 is
             | horribly insecure now.
             | 
             | Which security issues are worse?
             | 
             | A built-in cloud command logger is quite bad if you don't
             | know it's there, and is a security risk even if you know.
             | 
             | Some people occasionally enter things like private URLs,
             | tokens, UUIDs, pathnames and query value onto the command
             | line. Which is fine if they're the sort of thing that's ok
             | in your local, private command history. Not so much if it's
             | sent upstream.
        
           | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
           | The same problem exists on Linux when copying from browser to
           | LibreOfice.
        
             | fendy3002 wrote:
             | I usually gedit it first
        
         | bojan wrote:
         | I just use Notepad for that.
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | notepad pros:
           | 
           | * doesn't send your text to the botnet
           | 
           | * works with multiline text
           | 
           | cons:
           | 
           | * isn't 2 keys (win-R) away. I personally had to type win + N
           | + O + T + E + P until it showed up, then hit enter.
        
             | jfrunyon wrote:
             | Personally, I just type Win+R and then `no`, down, enter.
        
             | jenny91 wrote:
             | The mothership only got "notep" :/
        
               | gnu8 wrote:
               | Not great because when they see how many people use
               | Notepad, they're going to replace it with a piece of shit
               | like they did with the snipping tool and Freecell.
        
             | contravariant wrote:
             | That con is why I've used Authotkey to bind notepad to
             | win-N.
        
             | hdjjhhvvhga wrote:
             | > * isn't 2 keys (win-R) away.
             | 
             | Unless it's always on - an Alt-Tab away. I use Notepad++
             | for that, it comes in handy with seemingly infinite undos
             | and autosave.
        
             | temac wrote:
             | > notepad pros: > * doesn't send your text to the botnet
             | 
             | hm, yet? And are we even sure about that? Who expect that
             | what you type in the Run dialog being spied on and sent to
             | MS? Is this even documented anywhere?
             | 
             | At this point I'm considering all MS softwares have become
             | mainly hardcore spyware, with maybe some secondary legacy
             | functions remaining (but in lots of cases being stripped
             | slowly, while getting more bloated at the same time).
        
         | userbinator wrote:
         | I've always used a Notepad, but now I wonder whether _that_
         | also phones home in the newer versions of Windows...
        
       | wbkang wrote:
       | Isn't this the clipboard history? Did anyone verify this claim
       | independently? It's incredibly hard to believe they would upload
       | plain text for 'telemetry'.
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | Why can we not see what our computers are sending over the
       | internet?
       | 
       | If you say Wireshark then you are the problem.
       | 
       | It would need to be in something as easy as Task Manager.
       | 
       | Ideally you could also just set a token string that if it _ever_
       | gets sent over the internet you 'd get a immediate flag. Then
       | just shove it everywhere. And let the worlds users work it out.
       | 
       | I assume it's a technical issue.
        
       | adamrezich wrote:
       | if they're gonna do this you'd think they'd have the courtesy to
       | spiffy up the ancient dialog a bit at least
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | Nice! Let's use it to tell them what we think about it!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-20 23:01 UTC)