[HN Gopher] Submarine cable map rendered onto a globe ___________________________________________________________________ Submarine cable map rendered onto a globe Author : Daviey Score : 558 points Date : 2021-09-24 12:31 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (globe.gl) (TXT) w3m dump (globe.gl) | todd3834 wrote: | It's amazing to see that we are essentially just having one huge | LAN party. I wonder if the inventors of the phone or internet | could have ever imagined this. Now with low orbit satellites | connecting the world too, the innovation is incredible on this | planet. | kube-system wrote: | Alexander Graham Bell was alive to see this: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable... | globular-toast wrote: | They did imagine it. That's why it works. Even though it's | stretched to its limits, most of the traffic on there is IPv4 | which dates back to the 80s. | theandrewbailey wrote: | Cool visualization! Would be great if a cable's landing points | and capacity were shown (e.g. by hovering/clicking it). | bluesmoon wrote: | Obligatory mention of Greg's Cable Map which has been around | since forever: https://cablemap.info/ and now under new ownership | at https://www.infrapedia.com/app | quakeguy wrote: | Another one here: https://www.submarinecablemap.com | wing-_-nuts wrote: | Anyone else find it utterly fascinating that we have undersea | fiber running to Svalbard, the galapagos and keeling island? | These are not highly populated areas, and yet look at how abysmal | rural internet penetration is in the usa. | Groxx wrote: | A question! | | Are the parallel lines of cables actually spread out that far, or | is that to make it look nicer? | neilv wrote: | Cool. We take it for granted, but the intercontinental data (and | voice) connectivity cables are an impressive achievement for | humanity -- technical, and for global community. And globe.gl has | me "seeing" for the first time a particular cable for which I | have a much smaller personal story. | | One of those submarine cables being severed accounts for one of | only two software/hardware downtimes for a B2B startup's launch | MVP, which had been deployed in critical production overseas. | | Our station appliances at the facility needed to talk with | servers (at the network-closest AWS AZ) multiple times a minute, | for cryptographic security reasons. The appliances had a boot- | time check for network connectivity (which saw extreme latency | and packet loss as network unavailable). For reasons, the | facility powered off all equipment at night. | | One day, the facility said the appliances wouldn't "turn on", I | quickly found they were having network problems, but facility | insisted their LAN and Internet connectivity was fine. I was able | to carefully SSH in (with terminal responsiveness like a bad | dialup to an overloaded timesharing system), and relaxed the | timeout on the check that was in a retry loop, and the stations | came to life (albeit network requests during operations much | slower than normal). The facility manager advised later that day | that it turns out a submarine cable had been severed. | elihu wrote: | I assume these are all communications cables, but I'm curious if | anyone knows what the logistical issues would be to laying high- | capacity high-voltage DC lines across oceans? The idea being that | as renewable and specifically solar power becomes a larger | percentage of electrical generation, it'd be really nice to be | able to buy and sell power between the Americas, Europe, Asia, | and Africa. It's either that or use a lot of batteries, and power | lines seem like they ought to be the more efficient, effective | solution. HVDC losses can be reasonably low even for thousands of | miles* [1]. | | I'm thinking of having undersea links, for instance, between | Brazil and Western Africa, or Canada to Greenland to Iceland to | mainland Europe, or Alaska to Russia. | | (Wikipedia shows a number of short-distance undersea HVDC links | in Europe [1].) | | * "Depending on voltage level and construction details, HVDC | transmission losses are quoted at 3.5% per 1,000 km, about 50% | less than AC (6.5%) lines at the same voltage." | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current | enono wrote: | This is so cool. Thank you for building this. Does anyone have | insight into how the fuck he built this? | dang wrote: | Past related threads. Others? | | _Submarine Cable Map 2021_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27410133 - June 2021 (83 | comments) (<-- fabulous top comment) | | _Submarine Cable Map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25020431 - Nov 2020 (134 | comments) | | _Greg 's Cable Map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15176011 - Sept 2017 (41 | comments) | | _Submarine cable map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13614598 - Feb 2017 (35 | comments) | | _Map of Undersea Internet Cables_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10163461 - Sept 2015 (13 | comments) | | _Submarine Cable Map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9216894 - March 2015 (39 | comments) | | _Submarine Cable Map 2014_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8242448 - Aug 2014 (110 | comments) (<-- also a great top comment) | | _Submarine Cable Map 2013_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5151469 - Feb 2013 (10 | comments) | | _2012 Submarine Cable Map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4218909 - July 2012 (68 | comments) | | _Submarine Cable Map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3643749 - Feb 2012 (109 | comments) | | _Interactive Submarine Cable Map_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3481944 - Jan 2012 (1 | comment) | | _Map of worldwide undersea cables_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1606366 - Aug 2010 (49 | comments) | | _Map of All Undersea Internet Cables_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=423730 - Jan 2009 (2 | comments) | divbzero wrote: | Along the US west coast, it surprises me that Seattle, Portland, | Los Angeles, and San Diego each appear to have more submarine | cable connections than San Francisco. | zweifuss wrote: | I'm suprised how well connected Guam is. Are there reasons? | [deleted] | dagw wrote: | The US has several large military bases on Guam | felideon wrote: | Well, it is a US territory and our most western one, at that. | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | It is and so is one of the (uninhabited) Aleutian islands. | | ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extreme_points_of_ | the_... | dragonwriter wrote: | > Well, it is a US territory and our most western one, at | that. | | If you move the prime meridian to run through (e.g.) D.C. or | NYC, sure. | hipokampa wrote: | No cables between South America and Africa? Flat Earth! | edoceo wrote: | What? There's loads across the Atlantic. Why would anyone take | the long way? Pacific + Indian oceans are huge! | unknown_apostle wrote: | No direct cable between US and Russia... e.g. linking up the | Bering Strait. Anybody know the reason for this? | sigg3 wrote: | Cold war? | m-app wrote: | There's not a lot of content to be exchanged between Siberia | and Alaska. And running long stretches of fiber over land is | actually more costly and subject to failure than under the sea, | so going from Moscow -> Vladivostok (or something) over land, | then going subsea, and then Alaska -> West-coast US over land, | is not really beneficial. | theandrewbailey wrote: | Few people live there. Coincidentally that's why there's no | bridge up there, either. | lmilcin wrote: | For me the most fascinating thing about this is vast distances | through Pacific covered with the cables. One would assume it | would be easier to cover the distance around Pacific and not | directly through the middle of it, but it seems those | milliseconds are truly precious. | tills13 wrote: | One suggestion would be to use a better globe. I want to see | where in US the entrypoints are, for example, but it just become | a blurry mess when zoomed in. | antattack wrote: | I wonder if UK can use the fact that most US - EU links go | through UK as a leverage. | | EDIT: answer is yes: "LONDON (Reuters) - High-speed sub-Atlantic | cables may force banks to keep their armoury of currency trading | hardware in London for some time, even if the dealers themselves | go elsewhere when Britain leaves the European Union." [1] | | [1]https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-global-forex- | cables/trans... | zokier wrote: | Actually bit weird how there is not a single cable going from | Ireland to France (or elsewhere in the continent). I guess | going through UK works, but there are so many cables all around | the place that you'd think one of them would cross that gap. | not2b wrote: | That article is 5 years old, it would be interesting to see an | updated view on this. | tailspin2019 wrote: | A good idea in theory, but I believe phase 2 of our flawless | and perfectly thought out Brexit execution plan is to sever all | of those cables to prevent unwanted "foreign" bits from coming | in and taking up British bandwidth. | | We're then going to individually renegotiate brand new | communication transport/protocols with each foreign nation | separately. On far better terms, over the next 20-25 years. | | I think the current plan is to use a different breed of carrier | pigeon for each country so that we can tell where the data is | coming from and where to send our responses back to. | quotemstr wrote: | I'm surprised the Greenland Connect cable connects Newfoundland | to Iceland by way of Greenland instead of just terminating at | Greenland. I wonder how much non-Greenland through traffic the | cable gets. It'd have been cheaper to skip the | Greenland<->Iceland leg, right? | | It's also interesting how it looks like it's easier to go around | the west coast of Africa than to run cables overland across the | Sahara. | msmith wrote: | It's interesting that there are so many cables running through | the Suez Canal. I wonder if it's because of geopolitical reasons | for avoiding going over land through the Middle East. | up6w6 wrote: | Is there any map of land cables ? I know more about the few | submarine cables between south and north america than how the | internet actually arrives to inland cities of my state. | eskathos wrote: | working at a tier one telco. we have very precise maps of our | ground fibers. physical location is usually down to +-10cm. | length of fiber even takes into account any coiled up parts. | if a contractor wants to dig anywhere, then they have the | responsibility to query a national database before digging. | if they break our cable, then we have active monitoring | (reflecting a laser in a spare fiber, off the break, | calculating length to break) this interfaces with our map | software, so we can tell within half a meter where the cable | is broken. in most cases we end up suing the contractor for | the cost of repair and any SLA payments. | | to my knowledge no public maps exist, that will give you a | full picture. | zokier wrote: | As far as I can tell, there aren't that many cable running | through the actual canal, instead they cross over Egypt before | the canal starts or terminate in Suez: https://ibb.co/NyVXtST | globular-toast wrote: | Well, it's also easier to run a cable underwater. As far as I | know, the cables are literally just laid down there. You can't | just lay a cable on land. You've got to bury it or elevate it | on poles. I wonder how they deal with dredging the canal, | though. | degenerate wrote: | Likewise, what's the "benefit" of spreading the cables out by a | few kilometers when space allows? If you zoom in you can see | all the cables scrunched through the canal, but on more than | one occasion they are fanned out to spread evenly across the | given space. Likely it is only a visual eyecandy in the way | this map was created, and not a true indication of the cable | formations... but I tried looking for some answers on | https://www.iscpc.org and gave up. I would assume once a | suitable cable path is found, most subsequent cables would be | laid right alongside for higher chance of success avoiding | coral/trenches/etc. | | edit: The more I look at the map, the more it becomes clear | these lines do not indicate true cable locations. The lines are | too perfect... even for fiber optics. The ocean floor is a | treacherous beast! | detaro wrote: | that also increases the chance of something hitting a cable | taking out multiple cables at the same time. | finnh wrote: | Just guessing, but the benefit could be not cutting a cable | by accident as you lay yours? | finnh wrote: | per another comment[0], it's cheaper to just stay in the water | unless you specifically want to attach to a land network. I | don't have the knowledge the other commenter seems to have, but | that certainly seems believable to me. | | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28642764 | cycomanic wrote: | I'm not sure about the Suez, but is the reason why there are | almost 0 cables running on the African continent and instead | there being several cables laid around the coast. | Frost1x wrote: | There's another one that appears to run through the Gulf of | Mexico to the US as well (looks like AL or LA to TX), so I | suspect it's surprisingly cheaper and/or easier to get policy | approval. | | It's not entirely uncommon to route cables from and to your own | country through the water, apparently: | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_domestic_submarine_c... | PaulDavisThe1st wrote: | Land almost everywhere comes with ownership issues which can be | problematic for installing cables. The ocean is generally | unambiguously nationally owned, and so it's much simpler to | seek permission from a single source (government) than many | sources (owners). | walrus01 wrote: | they don't go _through_ the suez canal, they go across egypt by | land. | retrac wrote: | This is slightly tangential, but it's Atlantic-cable-related, and | I just learned about it. Let me set the stage. By the 1920s, | analog fax technology was established and there were a variety of | experimental and early commercial systems in use. One of the | first uses of modems was to transmit faxes over the long-distance | telephone network, turning a voltage into a pitch, and vice | versa. The electronic marvel of the 1930s in the newsroom, aside | from the teletypes, was that you could take a photo in San | Francisco and have it published just hours later in New York. | | But how do you get a picture across the Atlantic Ocean? Those | analog fax systems suffer from noise and in the experimental | systems of the 1910s and 1920s long-distance was impractical. | Shortwave to get over the Ocean was right out. There were no | transoceanic telephone links. But there were submarine telegraph | cables. Morse code or Baudot telex. Not very fast with no | amplifiers along the lines yet. But you could send a telex across | the Atlantic ocean. | | Enter the Bartlane transmission system. First, five photographs | were developed from the original negative, at different exposure | levels, using a conductive developer. So each point of the image | is more or less conductive depending on its exposure. Each of | these photos is scanned, as if it had pixels, and a 1-bit | intensity value collected for for all five photographs, creating | a five-level greyscale bitmap image on tape basically. (Five bits | worked with existing Baudot code equipment.) | | This enormous tape was then sent over the wire. On the receiving | end a printer, with intensity controlled by the level indicated, | would then selectively expose a spot on a photographic plate to | light, as it stepped through the tape. Six hours to send a small | image. But digital was the only way to send a photograph from | London to New York overnight from its early trials in the 1920s | until the 1950s. | | http://www.hffax.de/history/html/bartlane.html | axiosgunnar wrote: | Interesting | bob229 wrote: | Awful awful map. Terrible colours. Unintelligible | c54 wrote: | I would love to be able to plug in two locations and visualize on | a map the path my packets would take travelling from here to | there. A sort of visual traceroute. | | One problem I've had with existing tools is that it's hard to | find a server in a given place, even if you know that place has | internet. For instance I was facetiming with my partner who is | abroad in africa right now, but I'm not sure of a server to | [traceroute] against in the country she's in. | forinti wrote: | Some interesting places that caught my eye: | | - Cocos Islands has their own cable and they don't even have 600 | people; - Saint Helena has its own cable (googled to find out it | is very recent and will start offering 18Gbps in 2022); - French | Polynesia seems well served. | | Tristan da Cunha and Pitcairn probably will never get their | cables. | myself248 wrote: | I suspect that some of those places host strategically | important communications facilities. Perhaps spy satellite | downlink facilities, perhaps GNSS ground-segment base stations, | perhaps earth stations for other communications satellites. | | Oddly, those two specific islands don't. Saint Helena is | specifically courting such business, but I don't see any | indication that they've attracted anyway. But several other | small islands are definitely fibered-up on account of their | satellite facilities. | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | St. Helena has been lobbying for years to get one. I was glad | to see that finally working out for them. | voldacar wrote: | Interesting findings from this map: | | - Guam is a significant data/telecoms hub for the western pacific | region | | - There are some short cables installed in areas that don't seem | to make much sense, Such as the one in the gulf of Mexico, or | between Italy and Croatia | | - Many extremely sparsely populated islands and archipelagos have | their own undersea fiber, such as Svalbard. | | Super cool site. | [deleted] | veb wrote: | yikes, only 5 cables for NZ. still... better than it used to be I | suppose1 superb visualisations though. really cool to see. | w-m wrote: | At ~1 cable per 1M pop they are probably leaving most countries | behind them in a cable/person ratio, being topped only by the | transit hubs in the pacific. | snicker7 wrote: | I mean, it's far worse for Africa given their geographic size | and population. | neals wrote: | Very obvious of course, but never thought about it: Europe to | Asia (and back) takes a lot of routing. | willvarfar wrote: | There's some interesting military history and tech regarding | submarine cables. The first act of WW1 was to sever a cable, for | example. And during the Cold War the Americans planted bugs on | Russian cables and were eventually exposed by a spy. Nowadays the | Russians have some interesting capabilities that can be inferred. | | http://www.hisutton.com/Undersea_Cables.html | cableguy wrote: | Some years ago I was contacted by the descendants of an English | engineer who was working at the Long Island NY cable station of | the German Atlantic cable via the Azores at the start of WWI. | | Back in the 1950s a family member had recorded him on open reel | tape reminiscing about his experiences, and this was later | converted to audio cassettes. They sent me the tapes, and I | cleaned up the audio for them, and they gave me permission to | post the transcription and audio on my site. | | Turned out he was actually watching the signals coming in from | a German operator when the cable was cut by the Brits, and he | talks about this on one of the tapes. | | The story and short audio file are on my site: | https://atlantic-cable.com/CableStories/Claypoole/index.htm | divbzero wrote: | What happens when cables need to cross an isthmus like the Suez? | Looks like they don't literally go through the canal from Suez to | Port Said but they run pretty close by to minimize distance over | land. Most connections appear to run from Suez to Alexandria and | from Zafarana to Abu Talat. [1] | | [1]: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/google-egypt-suez- | digital... | gus_massa wrote: | Another visualization, not as nice, but it's easier to spot all | the landing sites: https://www.submarinecablemap.com/ | johncena33 wrote: | Actually I find it way more comprehensible than the posted | link. The posted link seems to prioritize form over | functionality. | gnabgib wrote: | Given the URL, it looks like this is a demo of the globe | software.. there are a few others in the root.. this one's | impressive: https://globe.gl/example/countries-population/ | fourthark wrote: | Wow, not sure how useful that is (standard caveat about | choropleths and density vs raw numbers) but very | impressive! Even the text overlays work nicely. | savingGrace wrote: | The two critiques I have of the OP link are solved in this one: | - The land/water contrast and the dark/light should be inverted | - Zoom speed is terrible in the OP link, but much better in | this map | cableguy wrote: | A short timeline: | | 1850 - first telegraph cable laid across the English Channel | between England and France. | | 1858 - first Atlantic telegraph cable between Ireland and | Newfoundland. | | 1866 - first permanently successful Atlantic telegraph cable. | | 1891 - first telephone cable laid across the English Channel. | | 1902 - two telegraph cables laid across the Pacific Ocean. | | 1956 - first telephone cable across the Atlantic. | | 1988 - first fiber optic cable across the Atlantic. | | My cable history website has records of over 2,200 telegraph, | telephone and fiber optic cables laid worldwide between 1850 and | 2021: https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/CableTimeLine/index.htm | | The front page of the site links to over a thousand individual | pages on cable history: https://atlantic-cable.com | jrsdav wrote: | I'm a bit curious about something that I've never thought about | before -- how were telegraph signals routed? Was it just a one | way street, or did they have a frequency range to work with? | cableguy wrote: | This was long before there were any electronic devices to | amplify or otherwise manipulate the signal. The telegraph | signals were just short electrical pulses representing Morse | code, with a positive voltage for a dot and a negative | voltage for a dash. The lines could only be worked in one | direction at a time for many years, but eventually circuits | were used at each end to "duplex" the cable, allowing | messages to be sent in both directions at the same tim. | jamal-kumar wrote: | Interesting fact if you're in latam/caribe... if you're down here | you have situations like DDoS saturation on MAYA-1 (caribbean | side) and then you have to make some phonecalls and re-route your | BGP over the PAC (Pan-American Crosssing on the pacific side). | Fun shit to do getting woken up by your boss at 1am! | ChrisArchitect wrote: | (2019) ? | | Though I supposed the latest commit is to use live data from | Telegeography | jkonline wrote: | I've always enjoyed Hurricane Electric's 3D network map [1^], it | includes a submarine cable filter view which always [2^] blows my | mind. | | [1]: https://he.net/3d-map/ | | [2]: of course, today the desktop I'm using doesn't support WebGL | and I can't see the submarine filter on my phone. YMMV | gorjusborg wrote: | There's no submarine cable to Antarctica? Is this because it | would be too difficult to terminate given the | expansion/contraction of the ice shelf? | MivLives wrote: | I'm guessing there's also not enough people to be worth it. | There's only between 1k and 5k people down there depending on | the time of year. | jedberg wrote: | But they're all scientists who have a lot of data to send | back and because of the isolation are desperate for live | streaming media and video calls. | throwbigdata wrote: | No. It's because no one is there. | rtkwe wrote: | Little need, it's essentially all government run bases down | there and they get their internet through various satellite | links. You could maybe run one to McMurdo Station since it's on | solid land and by a bay but there's just not enough data to | justify the cost. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen%E2%80%93Scott_South_P... | Karawebnetwork wrote: | Datco announced in NPlay Southern Cone 2021 that it projects a | 1,026 km submarine cable to Antarctica, through the Drake Pass | | https://www.convergencialatina.com/News-Detail/324197-3-8-Da... | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | Sweet. Thanks for that. | luxuryballs wrote: | Only thing more secure than a firewall is an ice wall! | temptemptemp111 wrote: | Sounds like someone gets it... | dylan604 wrote: | Unless you have a dead dragon | Daviey wrote: | Source is here: https://github.com/vasturiano/globe.gl | doerig wrote: | Specifically here: https://github.com/vasturiano/globe.gl/blob/ | master/example/s.... | gus_massa wrote: | It's interesting that most countries have a single entry point | (near the capital city), or only a few. One big exception is | Chile that has a cable that goes along the cost and reach many | cities. I a similar pattern in the east of Brazil and both sides | of New Guinea. | theandrewbailey wrote: | Check out cables in the Arctic. | abruzzi wrote: | its interesting that there seem to be cables connecting | locations on the North Alaska caost, but nowhere else. I | would have thought those locations would be too remote for | land based connections, unless there is fiber running from | Prudhoe Bay along the oil pipeline south. | cableguy wrote: | All the way back to the early days of the cable industry in the | 1800s, it was easier and safer to lay a cable along the coast | of undeveloped countries than to try and run a landline on | poles across rugged terrain. Both coasts of Central and South | America had telegraph cables running down them, with spurs for | inland connections. Same with Africa. Here's a map on my cable | history website showing the network in 1902: https://atlantic- | cable.com/Maps/1901-Berne-Map-BPL-Leventhal... | xwdv wrote: | What would it take to lay down a fat pipe to Antarctica and | finally connect all the continents? | mosburger wrote: | Another commmenter posted this above: | https://www.convergencialatina.com/News-Detail/324197-3-8-Da... | modeless wrote: | Starlink will be available there in less than a year and should | be quite sufficient. Possibly even better latency than fiber. | aaronmdjones wrote: | Money. Lots and lots of money. | | Given the population is always under 10k, and it doesn't serve | as an interconnection point for any further points along the | way (unlike e.g. Hawaii or Guam), it's just not worth it, | apparently. | ChrisArchitect wrote: | Related discussion from earlier in the year about the latest | submarine cable map: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27410133 | [deleted] | 404mm wrote: | I'm surprised that none were damaged in Suez Canal when the ship | (Ever Given) got stuck. | theandrewbailey wrote: | It makes little sense to lay cables in the water in the canal, | since they're always doing construction, digging, and dredging | in and around it. | dathinab wrote: | The ship only hit the grounds on the sides where it's less | deep, but the cables probably go through the middle area where | it's the deepest. So there wasn't much of a chance for the ship | to damage any cables. | i_am_proteus wrote: | There is no reason to run a submarine cable through a canal, | because there is land adjacent to the canal. | kube-system wrote: | There's land adjacent to many of these cables. It is cheaper | to bury cables in water -- there's a lot fewer shovels needed | and fewer property disputes. | cableguy wrote: | Also cables laid underwater are better protected from theft | and vandalism than those on land in possibly hostile | territories. | philipov wrote: | Fascinating, I didn't know Guam was a hub for cable intersections | in the pacific ocean. | vanattab wrote: | I was surprised by how many lines seem to just run along the | coasts of land. Is it really cheaper to lay and maintain fiber in | the ocean then over land along the coast? | WarOnPrivacy wrote: | I would think so given overland is more likely to hit right-of- | ways owned by entrenched telcos - who tirelessly work to screw- | over any comm progress that doesn't enrich them as much as they | want. | | Past that there's endless interests that have to be negotiated | with. And any part of the cable has to travel above ground will | be more vulnerable. | tantalor wrote: | It's kind of hard to distinguish between land and water when they | are both black. Improving the contrast or adding a border would | help. | contravariant wrote: | Indeed, especially for those few spots seemingly in the middle | of the ocean where the cables converge it would be interesting | to know what land masses (if any) are nearby. Right now this is | very difficult to see. | skeeter2020 wrote: | I actually think there's a real unique and distinctive | visualization caused by this decision. We're typically very | geo-politically focused when we look to evaluate this sort | information, but think about it without differentiating | between land and ocean, without countries or borders. Think | of nodes and edges in a graph, with the size/volume of edges | weighing priority. Totally different way to view "earth". | intpete wrote: | It appears to be Guam. | nonfamous wrote: | Inspired by | https://twitter.com/tylermorganwall/status/14406695331575562... , | or vice versa? | hun-nemethpeter wrote: | This animation was featured at Daily Dose of Internet at 09/23 | at 2:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRhnpFzIlx0&t=120s | killjoywashere wrote: | Protecting the sea lanes of communication is actually a core US | Navy mission (and probably high priorities for several other | world Navies as well). Particularly the major choke points: | Strait of Gibraltar, Strait of Malacca, Strait of Hormuz, the | Panama Canal, Suez Canal, Bab el Mandeb, Turkish Straits, and the | Cape of Good Hope. | alexpotato wrote: | I'm fascinated by that Gulf of Mexico cable. | | Is that for oil wells? | [deleted] | zweifuss wrote: | Yes: https://www.bp.com/en_us/united-states/home/products-and- | ser... | hnarn wrote: | This might be a stupid question, but is it implicit that these | "submarine cables" are all fiber cables? If so, are they of | similar or very different bandwidths? I would think there are | cables of differing ages that are used for different things, or | are all non-fiber cables taken out of service long ago, or are | they just not included on the map? | | Also, the "Polar Express" cable on that map is fascinating, but | it seems like it's not planned to be completed until 2026.[1] | | [1]: https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/asia-europe- | afr... | azernik wrote: | I strongly doubt there are any non-fiber submarine cables. | Fiber's main strength is range; trying to run signals over | electrical conductors over hundred-km-plus distances is not | cost-effective and hasn't been for decades. | | (It's been done historically, but with very heavy cables, very | high endpoint power levels, lots of repeaters, and really poor | throughput.) | hnarn wrote: | > I strongly doubt there are any non-fiber submarine cables. | | I strongly doubt electrical cables are fiber cables for | example :-) | | On a more serious note, I was thinking that there are perhaps | copper cables used for telephone communications that are | still used simply because they haven't yet failed, but I | assume fiber has perhaps been the standard for backbones long | before it became something people have in their homes. | jhgb wrote: | Wouldn't it make sense for some electrical cables to have | some fiber in them? When you're already laying them, you | could get two services for the price of one. | cycomanic wrote: | Optical fibres are also pretty good sensors so it's not | unlikely that some fibres are added just for sensing | purposes (they are eput into lots of bridges and other | things for example). That said it highly depends on the | length of your electrical cables if putting in fibre for | communications makes sense. Typically (grossly | simplified) you need optical amplifiers when you go | significantly over transmission distances of 100km so | they need power supplies, take up quite a bit of space | etc.. | tbihl wrote: | In almost all conceivable contexts, no. If you've ever | done any work with electrical code, you are familiar with | the spacing requirements between electrical conduit and | data wires to prevent magnetic interference: at least a | foot apart, and perpendicular crossings if crossings are | necessary. The voltage on underwater electrical cables | are quite high, as is the bandwidth on underwater data | cables, so you definitely can't have them mixing if you | want anything near optimum results on data transfer. | fsckboy wrote: | he was asking about fiber which is not subject to | electro-magnetic interference | midasuni wrote: | Even setting that aside Undersea power is DC | hnarn wrote: | I suppose it would, I guess I'm just wondering for how | long fiber cables have been the standard, and if there | are any operational cables from the time before that. I'm | pretty sure there are plenty of cables dedicated for one | purpose (e.g. electricity only) that do not contain fiber | simply because there wasn't a need or requirement when it | was planned. | | edit: Here's an example: | | > The world record from 1994, for the longest HVDC cable | with the highest capacity, was equalled in 2000 with the | successful completion of the Swedish-Polish HVDC | transmission link between Sweden and Poland: | | > 1. Stretching over 250 km, it is one of the two longest | submarine HVDC cables ever laid. | | > 2. At 600 MW, the cable is one of the most powerful | HVDC cables in commercial operation. | | > 3. At 450 kV DC, this cable together with the cable | between Sweden and Germany, has the highest voltage | rating of all existing submarine HVDC cables. | | This cable doesn't seem to have any other purpose than | transferring electricity, and it was installed "only" 21 | years ago. | walrus01 wrote: | Already a thing, one of the high voltage power cables to | Tasmania also has singlemode fiber in it. Not uncommon. | dtech wrote: | I highly doubt it's cost-effective. These things are | complicated and have specialized equipment. The endpoints | also very different for data and electricity. | cranekam wrote: | I'm certainly no expert here but I'm guessing it doesn't | make sense for two reasons: | | 1) Modern communications fibers are complicated (https:// | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable [1]) | and presumably expensive so speculatively adding them to | power cables would likely be a pricey endeavor. | | 2) AFAIK most submarine cables are systems -- e.g. a ring | the connects various places so that there are two paths | between points -- so trying to plan one to that co-opts | existing bits of fiber piggy-backed on power probably | wouldn't be easy. Also you'd have the issue of dealing | with different generations of fiber, standards, etc. | | [1] On reading this it turns out that modern fibers | actually carry power as well so that repeaters en route | can be powered. | waynecochran wrote: | Doesn't a lot of these cables pre-date fiber? They had these | in WWII. I remember the Gilligan's Island episode where the | cable washes up in the lagoon and the professor was able to | connect up a phone so they call around the world -- of course | Gilligan screws it all up at the end. | gok wrote: | Until the 1950s, transatlantic communication was done with | radio. Then it was copper until the 80s | azernik wrote: | None of that stuff is still in service. (At least not | telecom.) They require periodic, expensive maintenance, and | fiber outclasses copper for long-distance signatures to a | much greater degree than for the last-mile ground traffic | for which copper is still used. | walrus01 wrote: | > I strongly doubt there are any non-fiber submarine cables. | | not for telecom, not anymore, but a number of submarine cable | laying ships are equipped specifically for laying high | voltage power cables to offshore wind farms. And for things | like high voltage cables linking medium sized islands to a | nearby mainland (eg: Vancouver Island, BC to the continent). | | After submarine telecom, the biggest uses for such vessels | are offshore power and the oil/gas industry. | isthisnametaken wrote: | Not just medium-sized islands. The UK has several | interconnectors to other European countries for importing | and exporting power | | https://www.nationalgrid.com/our-businesses/national-grid- | ve... | spzb wrote: | One less than usual at the moment though | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-58570893 | retrac wrote: | Some coaxial lines were laid until the 1980s. Seems likely | that at least one small island somewhere has a copper | submarine cable supplying their data/phone needs still. But | it's decidedly obsolete, yes. | caymanjim wrote: | When I lived in the Cayman Islands, the primary submarine cable | (I forget its name) was fiber, and I had better net there than | I had in the US. It went down for a week or two one time, and | the entire island's net traffic was relegated to a much older | copper cable that ran to Jamaica. Cayman is a tiny market, but | it still crippled our net because the bandwidth was tiny; it | was like a couple T1s for the whole population. | cableguy wrote: | Copper communications cable were in use from 1850 until the | 1980s, when they were replaced one by one with fiber. Almost | all the copper cables ever laid are still in the depths of the | ocean, as it's not worth salvaging them except near shore. A | few of the more recent copper cables are still operational, but | they are used only for scientific research. | hnarn wrote: | That's true for communication cables though, so what about | cables for electricity? That's mostly what my original | comment was about, that the title seems to imply any | submarine cable is automatically a data cable. | im_down_w_otp wrote: | Why would you send electricity across the ocean? You can | generate it locally on both sides. | addingnumbers wrote: | Not all of these lines go across the ocean. If you're | trying to move power between Sao Paolo and Beunos Aries, | it might be cheaper to lay a sea cable than to deal with | all the terrain, land rights and borders involved in an | overland route. | hnarn wrote: | Not all submarine cables cross oceans. | mannykannot wrote: | There is (if it has not been scuppered by brexit) | Icelink, a project to connect Iceland to the UK. The | rationale, as usual, is mismatched supply and demand, | where the supply is green geothermal power. | | https://askjaenergy.com/2018/04/17/icelink-in-operation- | by-2... | | The idea of connecting solar farms in the Sahara to | Europe under the Mediterranean is also perennially in the | air, with the same rationale as Icelink. | lifekaizen wrote: | Some seem to be for redundancy, some bring power to | municipalities (i.e. island cities) with limited power | production capacity. There's a list here | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_power_cable | [deleted] | cableguy wrote: | There are high voltage submarine cables for electrical | power - these are used to cross rivers and lakes, for | example. International cables, like the ones between the UK | and the European mainland, are used for load balancing. As | it's difficult technically to transmit electrical power | over a subsea cable (and exponentially more difficult at | the length increases), these cables have limited | application. There's over a million kilometers (~600,000 | miles) of fiber optic communications cable around the world | right now, and perhaps a thousand or so miles of power | cable, so "submarine cable" without any qualifier almost | always refers to communications cables. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_power_cable#Operati | o... | [deleted] | cycomanic wrote: | Yes operating a non fibre cable is too expensive and does not | make sense. Fibre cables on the other hand have remained | operational over a long time. AFAIK there are no fibre cables | using electro optic repeaters operational anymore. But the | earliest fibres which used optical amplification are still | operational. This is the beauty about fibre communication. You | largely only need to upgrade the endpoints to increase your | throughput. | samstave wrote: | https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/pt7gu3/ear... | | Way better version, and he includes the code. | CobrastanJorji wrote: | These sorts of projects are always fascinating to me. The hard | part of these sorts of visualizations always seems to be | acquiring the data in the first place. I would have no idea where | to begin looking for a record of exactly how all of the | underwater fiber optic cables are positioned. I wonder whether | people come across this sort of data and think to do something | with it, or whether people start by deciding to make this | visualization and then go forth and search out the data. | cableguy wrote: | This cable industry site regularly publishes an Almanac of all | current active cables with maps and details for each one: | https://issuu.com/subtelforum/docs/subtel_forum_almanac_issu... | slivanes wrote: | https://www.infrapedia.com/app - used to be called greg's cable | map. | dgritsko wrote: | I found a couple that have interesting or creative names - | Bifrost, Polar Express, Apollo, Grace Hopper, Amerigo Vespucci. | Most of them are pretty dry by comparison, which feels like a | missed opportunity. | lifekaizen wrote: | Very cool! Quick browser note: get blank screen with Brave on iOS | iPad (with shields up; does work with shields down), no problem | on iPhone. | a9h74j wrote: | If you haven't viewed the OP, one surprise: apart from in the | Pacific, the relative dominance of coast-hugging routes. | [deleted] | genghisjahn wrote: | Gotta mention this article from Neal Stephenson... | | _Mother Earth Mother Board_ | | >The hacker tourist ventures forth across the wide and wondrous | meatspace of three continents, chronicling the laying of the | longest wire on Earth. | | https://www.wired.com/1996/12/ffglass/ | wrycoder wrote: | That detailed research by Stephenson also served as the | foundation for the fiber optic cable laying and data haven | subplot in Cryptonomicon. | blamazon wrote: | The Philippines was the first place I looked on this map | because of this book. | DanTheManPR wrote: | You can find the FLAG cable referenced in the article on this | map. The easiest landmark for finding it is the narrow section | of the Malay peninsula. Stephenson spends some time in the | article covering the overland construction there. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-24 23:01 UTC)