[HN Gopher] I bricked then recovered my reMarkable 2 ___________________________________________________________________ I bricked then recovered my reMarkable 2 Author : greenhathacker Score : 264 points Date : 2021-09-27 15:20 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (operand.ca) (TXT) w3m dump (operand.ca) | ericcholis wrote: | I had a very similar problem, although the root cause was a | drained battery. After finally charging it, the device was stuck | in a boot loop. | | I wasn't able to create a proper connection via the pogo; but the | community was amazingly helpful (and appropriately critical of my | poor soldering skills). | | Since the device hadn't synchronized to the cloud in some time, I | had to send it out for data recovery. The cost was worth it for | me. Happily, the data was fully recoverable and I was able to | simply get a drive image and work with it locally using a mix of | traditional OS tools as well as tools provided by the Remarkable | community. | selykg wrote: | So, I guess I'll give my (sadly) negative experience with these | things. | | First, I sort of ordered it on a whim. I liked the idea and | thought it'd be cool to use for work while not having to use my | personal iPad even more. | | This is their decision, but they ship with DHL, which is | absolutely godawful in literally every experience I've had with | them. I learned after ordering that the device doesn't allow | searching within your handwritten notes, a feature I use | regularly in GoodNotes on my iPad. | | So, I looked at how to return the device before I even got it. | Their support said to just tell DHL to return to shipper. I | called DHL they said "sure, we'll do that" for the next two days | I kept getting text messages from DHL saying they hadn't managed | to ship it back yet, they'd update me the next day. | | Then the device shows up at my doorstep and DHL skipped requiring | a signature and just dropped it on the porch. Great. | | So I email support back and get the process to fully return from | them started. | | They send me to a "returns" website that doesn't see my order. | Great. Email them back and ask for how to workaround this. | | The next email they send me a second returns site.. they have two | apparently. Then this time their instructions are about returning | for a replacement device. Email back after that and clarify, I am | not returning for another device, I am returning and getting a | refund. They said oh sure, our mistake. | | Their returns site (2nd site) was about as unclear as can be. In | fact their instructions in their email were, yet again, for | returning for a replacement device, the site said to print 3 | copies of one sheet, another one copy of the label to attach to | the box. I did so, finally got DHL scheduled to pick it up. | | DHL says "nope, we need a different sheet of paper" which was not | provided to me until I went searching for it in the returns site. | At this point DHL is gone with the box. | | I write some feedback to Remarkable about their incredibly | terrible instructions and they just keep apologizing but | referencing my replacement device despite repeating 5 times at | this point that I'm returning for a refund. | | DHL has had the package for over 10 days now and it's not moving. | My luck, Remarkable is going to get the stupid thing at some | point and then ship me a replacement device instead of refunding | me and I'll have to do this stupid insanity all over again. | | The device itself seems fine, I opened and used it while I was | waiting for Remarkable to figure their shit out on my return as | each email takes over a day to receive a response. So I have | about a week of waiting to return this thing just in waiting for | them to send me appropriate return instructions. Another 10 days | of screwing around with DHL and no movement of the product. | | I would really recommend NOT getting one of these devices unless | you are 100% sure you're going to keep it. If you have any | inkling of an idea that you may utilize the return process, just | don't, it's not worth it. | | This has been the single WORST customer support experience I've | ever had at this point. Their support people simply regurgitate | snippets, and sadly they can't even use the correct snippets, and | for that they take over 24 hours to get back to you with those | incorrect instructions. | | Run, just run away. | chews wrote: | now now, it's a kinda obvious screwup, but with big footguns like | this there should be an easier way to re-flash the thing | though... it really should have a shadow-copy of a partition that | can restore it to factory. It wouldn't be to hard to implement. | | it's just lovely to seen an open device... this made me want to | buy one. | kayodelycaon wrote: | Oh boy do I have opinions with this one. This seems like a lot of | work to avoid using a perfectly good package manager _on the | device_. | | They could have used rsync without installing rsync on the | device. The target device doesn't need to have rsync for rsync to | be used. | | They could have installed the package manager and left it. It | doesn't run anything in the background on my device. It's easy | enough to verify you don't have a systemd service or timer | running it. (cron isn't installed, iirc) | | They could have compiled rsync with all of the libraries bundled | with it. (Maybe this is beyond their expertise?) | | Their solution is using Docker to use the package manager and | then _overwriting system files_ on the device in the worse | possible way, without understanding what they are doing. At that | point, they verified in Docker. Should be safe to run it on the | tablet then, yes? | | What attack vector are they worried about? :/ Toltec is actively | worked on, odds are someone would notice someone else fucking | with repository. | | The cherry on top was completely not understanding how the | remarkable works. There are two partitions for a reason. The | inactive one is used for software updates. When the reMarkable | downloads an update, it downloads it to the inactive partition. | When you "install" the update, it flips which of the two | partitions is active. If the update fails to boot, it flips back | to the known good state. All they had to do was switch the active | partition, the next update would overwrite the broken partition. | https://github.com/ddvk/remarkable2-recovery/issues/6 | | This looks like a bad case of tunnel vision, combined with a lack | of understanding. I'm glad they managed to figure out how to fix | it. | Eeems wrote: | I know I reacted hard to this statement: | | > Going further down the rabbit hole, the toltec GitHub page | mentions that it works on top of the Entware distribution, and | recommends what is basically "wget | bash". I'm not a fan of | this. Could I install my own rsync? | | We made sure that the toltec install process includes a hash of | the install script to prove that it isn't modified by a man-in- | the-middle. Toltec itself requires the use of SSL to connect | after the fact, which lowers the risk after it's been | installed. We are also exploring the implications of adding | package signing[0]. | | 0. https://github.com/toltec-dev/build/issues/14 | tjoff wrote: | _> We made sure that the toltec install process includes a | hash of the install script to prove that it isn 't modified | by a man-in-the-middle._ | | A bit late for that, no? | | Maybe I misunderstood but the modified version could do it's | thing and then download the official script to fool that | check. | | Or pretty much anything else imaginable. | kayodelycaon wrote: | The bash script is fairly easy to download and verify | before running it. It's only 200 lines with a few functions | and if statements. | Eeems wrote: | I guess you haven't looked at our install instructions[0]. | The hash check is done before running the script. You can't | run the script if it doesn't match unless you choose to | just run it manually and ignore the check. | | 0. https://toltec-dev.org/ | greenhathacker wrote: | I made the mistake in that post of not mentioning that I | didn't want to be required to connect the rm2 to wifi, and | installing a package manager would mean I would need to do | that to install software. If anything it would be something I | would temporarily install, use it to install rsync, then | figure out how to uninstall it, and in my mind that's | functionally equivalent to what I was doing with docker. | Pushing to / instead of /opt was my mistake :) | | I apologize, I could have better expressed why I took the | path I did. I'll edit the post later today. | kayodelycaon wrote: | Ah! Now that approach makes a lot more sense. Any | particular reason to avoid putting it on a WiFi network for | a few minutes? | throwaway09223 wrote: | "They could have used rsync without installing rsync on the | device. The target device doesn't need to have rsync for rsync | to be used." | | This is not true. | kayodelycaon wrote: | It very much is true. I do it all the time. If the target | device is running ssh, you can use rsync on the source. | | https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to- | copy... | | Edit: Looks like I was wrong. | xdfgh1112 wrote: | Doesn't that run rsync --server on the server via ssh? | throwaway09223 wrote: | yup. | throwaway09223 wrote: | No, it is not true. You're misunderstanding how this works. | | The document you link is using ssh as a transport protocol | as opposed to the rsync protocol. The rsync binary must be | installed on both systems for this to work. | | When you run something like: | | rsync file user@rhost:/dest/path | | The local rsync binary invokes ssh, and then executes the | rsync binary on the remote system and from there the two | instances of rsync effectuate the transfer. | | If you do not have rsync available in your path on the | remote system you will not be able to copy files over ssh. | This is documented in the manpage. | | Try it. | _hyn3 wrote: | Exactly. You absolutely must have the rsync binary | installed locally. The rsync "server" should only | actually be run if you know you need it (that is, only if | you are providing rsync services to other people). | tnhh wrote: | As others have pointed out, that doesn't quite work. But | the way that I use rsync with my remarkable is to use sshfs | to mount the remarkable's filesystem, and then run rsync | between the local and mounted filesystems. Works for me | without having to install rsync on the remarkable. | danachow wrote: | Unfortunately you will not get any speed boost in that | case, in fact it will be slower having to fetch all the | remote side data for small file changes. | _e wrote: | Does remarkable use a fork of ChromiumOS? ChromiumOS uses the | BOOT-A and BOOT-B partitions for upgrades and it reverts to the | previously used boot partition if the OS fails to successfully | boot[0]. | | [0] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design- | docs/... | Evidlo wrote: | No, it uses Yocto/OpenEmbedded. | _e wrote: | Thank you for the fast response and, also, for putting this | onto my radar. For anyone else who is curious, | Yocto/OpenEmbedded is used to create custom linux | distributions for embedded devices: | | https://www.yoctoproject.org/members/openembedded/ | | https://www.yoctoproject.org/software-overview/ | a-dub wrote: | using two partitions in this way on embedded devices has been | a trope for a very long time. service/warranty calls are | expensive! | | usually there are three. system a and system b which are | updated and flipped and some sort of emergency recovery that | either has a factory image or a very light rom that phones | home for a new image. | TechBro8615 wrote: | It sounds like Blue/Green deployments. | a-dub wrote: | sorta. but i think that blue/green deployments are | typically monitored by some central control that will | halt and reverse a whole fleet deployment, where | typically embedded devices run that state machine | locally. (after flashing the unused partition, if it | fails to boot, fail back to the old one and disable the | update). | _e wrote: | For the curious... An overview of the Blue/Green | deployment model: | | https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/devops/what-is-blue- | green-d... | [deleted] | morpheuskafka wrote: | I work part-time for my university's help desk and I was both | impressed and disappointed the first time I came across one of | these--one the one hand, its highly customizable and supports SSH | access. On the other hand, there is shockingly no way to get the | MAC address without connecting via SSH, even though this is | popular among academics who often need to get onto MAC filtered | networks. | | In hindsight, we probably could have connected it to the guest | network, gotten its IP and then had the networking group look up | its MAC on their logs. What we wound up doing is telling the user | to go home and check their own router for the MAC, which is | obviously less than ideal service. | formerly_proven wrote: | I was under the impression that having the MAC address on the | device's label was some kind of regulatory requirement for Wifi | - I have never seen a wireless device without it. | trangus_1985 wrote: | It is a requirement, although you can now use "e-labels". | Such as, a page in the settings that has the FCC information. | (IANAL) | judge2020 wrote: | I think that's for APs, given pretty much no smartphone has | its MAC printed on it. | [deleted] | formerly_proven wrote: | Oh, true! I thought it was the MAC address in tiny print on | iPhones but it's actually the FCC ID and IMEI. On the other | hand, all smartphones have the MAC and serial number easily | accessible in their settings menu. | bbarnett wrote: | Many phones let you rotate your MAC too, to prevent | profiling... | jaywalk wrote: | You must not have seen an iPhone in quite a while. There | is absolutely nothing printed on iPhones these days, all | of the regulatory stuff is under the Settings menu. | cookingmyserver wrote: | Depends on the country. Although they have been hiding it | pretty well, and usually it is only symbols and not | detailed information like IDs. | djrogers wrote: | > I thought it was the MAC address in tiny print on | iPhones but it's actually the FCC ID and IMEI. | | iPhones haven't been doing that for years - they have no | markings other than the apple logo on the back. | NieDzejkob wrote: | Where does your phone have this sticker? | drfuchs wrote: | In the battery compartment. | judge2020 wrote: | No, or at lease, not on iPhone: https://guide- | images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/QAtX1WnxfYrMhOZg.hug... (13 on | the left, 12 on the right; via iFixit) | gh02t wrote: | I have a Hololens 2 on my desk that is the same way, you have | to log in and sign in with a Microsoft account to access the | MAC. Getting it onto my corporate network was a massive pain. | Worse, to log in with our directory service we need to be on | the corporate network that is MAC blocked so I ended up having | to make a throwaway MS account and tethering it with my phone. | Prior to this I didn't even realize you could omit the address, | for some reason I thought it was a requirement to have the MAC | address printed somewhere on the device/packaging. | kayodelycaon wrote: | The reMarkable is surprisingly good for its primary purpose. | Everything else it does... is limited. They things they did do | are done well given how they are implemented. The epub/pdf | experience sucks because it doesn't have a real pdf reader. It | just renders the epub to pdf and then throw the pdf into the | note-taking app. | | Arguably, none of the functionality is half-assed. It works | very well as a writing tablet. It absolutely sucks as a general | purpose device because everything except the very core | experience is flat-out missing. | | There isn't a good general purpose eInk tablet and the | reMarkable is the closest thing we have. :( | NoGravitas wrote: | Maybe keep an eye out on the PineNote. It's bound to be much | worse than the reMarkable as a writing tablet, but it should | also be general purpose in a lot of ways the rm isn't. | kayodelycaon wrote: | Don't have the skills to hack on one myself but I can't | wait to see what people do with it. :) | zhdc1 wrote: | The Onyx Boox series is really good. The writing experience | is almost as good as a Remarkable. The reading experience is | excellent, and it's runs Android. | mariusor wrote: | > and it's runs Android | | I apologize for the snark, but I refuse to see how this is | a plus over "it runs vanilla linux". | salamandersauce wrote: | There's no vanilla linux version of Libby, Kindle app, | Kobo, Marvel Unlimited, Pressreader etc. At best you can | maybe use a web browser for those which is a sub-par | experience. For reading content Android is IMO better | because there is general an app for DRM'd content. Linux | doesn't have that and not all content can be made DRM | free. | scotu wrote: | I would also add that last I heard Onyx was probably | violating the GPL if that is a decision factor for | anybody reading this | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23735962 | | (please correct me if there were more recent | developments) | kybernetikos wrote: | If you have ebooks in a number of different ecosystems, | perhaps kobo, comixology, kindle, adobe digital editions, | pdf, actual epubs, microsoft word documents, then it's | amazing having access to the official apps to read those | file formats and connect to the online services. | sofixa wrote: | It's a plus when talking about a tablet-sized device with | a touch screen - there are more Android apps for those | use cases than Linux ones. | | That will hopefully change with the PineNote. | smhost wrote: | vanilla linux doesn't have any good ereader apps | orbital-decay wrote: | koreader is one of the best reader apps out there. | | https://github.com/koreader/koreader | salamandersauce wrote: | Koreader has a lot of options but IMO the UI is perhaps | the worst I've ever used. Also has giant use case gaps | that will never be fixed like the fact it can't handle | vertical Japanese writing. | laserbeam wrote: | > It just renders the epub to pdf and then throw the pdf into | the note-taking app. | | I found it weird at first... But then you realise you're | supposed to be able to write on the pages any time. The | moment you support general epub rendering your pages are no | longer fixed and your notes should move around as well. The | moment you change your font size, all your notes, drawings | and highlights no longer match the underlying text. I | actually think "render to pdf", or more specifically to some | fixed page format, is the ideal experience on this device. | Realigning your notes is an impossible problem to solve and | if I were a dev I would also discourage any features that | reflow text on demand. | | Missing features (search in document, bookmarks, whatever) | should be implemented for both pdfs and epubs. | thaumasiotes wrote: | > Realigning your notes is an impossible problem to solve | | Kindles have solved this problem, but instead, notes are | not visible on the page but must be specially consulted. | aeturnum wrote: | It seems like a different problem if they are not | rendering handwriting on the 'page' of the epub. | thaumasiotes wrote: | OK, but both problems are "realigning your notes". | | It is possible to render an element to the side of the | main text in a flowing epub; I did this when I wanted to | include line numbers in a text. You could use that idea | to keep visible notes _near_ their original location | while reflowing the epub. But it wouldn 't work at all | with notes that appear over the main text. | | It's also possible to just print the notes within the | text; this is the approach taken by this recent edition | of a selection of the Tai Ping Yan Ji ( | https://www.amazon.com/dp/7540351934/ ). Rather than | being reproduced images of older printings that include | notes, it's all flowing text and marginalia is reproduced | inline, within brackets and in a smaller font. (This goes | so far as to indicate which part of the page the | marginalia originally appeared in, though I think this is | more a matter of there being different words for | marginalia from different locations.) | | That approach, of course, will not handle non-textual | notes well. | aeturnum wrote: | I think OP could have used a more specific description | for the sake of clarity. | | The idea is that using a reMarkable is just like using a | pad of paper, so you can make arbitrary handwritten notes | on the text. It's hard to imagine how arbitrary notes | like that would be displayed on different epub | renderings, so I think it's understandable why they use | their approach. I also think it's a different problem | than kindles have solved. | thaumasiotes wrote: | Marginalia does not generally appear over the text on | which it comments, because that would make both the text | and the marginalia difficult to read. (Just look at the | word - it's text that appears in the margins.) | | So for practically all purposes, treating each note as an | image which should be rendered to the side of a | particular part of the dynamically-flowed text will solve | the problem. This isn't that hard to do. | | If someone is underlining parts of the text itself, that | isn't independent of the flow of the text, and so it's | harder to reflow. But I'm taking "notes" to mean | commentary. | lottin wrote: | What do you mean a real pdf reader? The pdf reader displays | pdfs, allows you to navigate the document and to scribble on | it. Sure, it could do some things better, but it's perfectly | functional as it is. | salamandersauce wrote: | I find my Boox Note Air pretty good. It runs Android | basically every app I've thrown at it works although the fact | that's eInk means stuff like Netflix, games etc. is obviously | not a good experience. Some apps take a little fiddling to | get working well on eInk like filtering out page turn | animations or page refresh settings but once that's done it | works well. The stock reader is very good at PDFs and | passable at ePubs but you can just download another app so | it's no big deal. | | Remarkable seems like it's still a little better at writing | feel/writing latency but the Boox line is very good as eInk | tablets. | syshum wrote: | hmm I found the eBook functionality to be passable. I read | ebooks and PDF's on my Remarkable 2 all the time | | >It absolutely sucks as a general purpose device because | everything except the very core experience is flat-out | missing. | | As is intended, I do not want a general purpose device, I | want an electronic notebook, to replace what used to be many | many paper notebooks I used to keep meeting notes, daily | activity logs, quick todo lists, etc. | | I do not want email on it, I do not want notifications on it, | I wanted to replace my paper notebook, and be able to read | ebooks | | The Remarkable 2 replaced my Paper-white and all physical | notebooks for me. | CPLX wrote: | I am completely on your side, that's the same reason I | bought mine. | | But damm I sure wish I had a way to take a note on my | iPhone and have it show up on my Remarkable. That would | mean when I pick up the Remarkable it has all my notes on | it. | | Anyone know a good way to do that? | syshum wrote: | This is one area I agree they should look to improve or | have offical API's so the community could improve. | | I am not in the Apple echosystem but I would love a way | to better sync with OneNote, and/or have my Task list | manageable by ToDo, ToDoist, or some other task manager, | but appear on the Remarkable to check things off. | jackson1442 wrote: | You can connect it via USB and ssh locally. Obviously showing | it in the interface would be better but that would work. | | It also fully supports 802.1X, which surprised me. | tadbit wrote: | Yeah... screw that. reMarkable's crappy UI shouldn't | necessitate a bunch of extra work on the grandparent's part. | They're completely justified in telling end users to go home | to get the MAC. | chefandy wrote: | Yeah, that's bananas. Even the cheapest of cheap IOT devices | expose that, even if it's just on a sticker. | stefan_ wrote: | You could also of course turn off the ineffective MAC | filtering, was this option considered? | easton wrote: | I doubt that they are actually using MAC filtering, but | probably some kind of captive portal that the Remarkable | doesn't have support for (without setting up a SOCKS proxy, | which doesn't count as a solution, IMO)[0]. Most of these | captive portal systems allow someone with privileges to add a | MAC address to the system manually, so that device has access | without having to go through the portal itself. In the old | days, that was the kosher way to get Xboxes and the like on | hotel Wi-Fi (they'd often have a number you could call from | the room to get a network admin to put your widget on the | list). | | 0: https://remarkablewiki.com/tips/wifi | | (Also, given that OP's a part time helpdesk person, they | can't turn the MAC filtering off anyway). | shreddit wrote: | Just connect to a wifi you have admin access to. This is very | sad. | | https://support.remarkable.com/hc/en-us/articles/36000267477... | blumomo wrote: | Huh? You still need the root password which you only get once | you open the settings menu. I protect my remarkable with a | PIN code, so only I should see the root password. | thaumasiotes wrote: | If you connect the device to a wireless network, you can | see the MAC address from the perspective of the network. | You can't connect without advertising your address. | e12e wrote: | Hm, you can't get the wifi MAC by connecting via USB, and ssh | in over USB, then using iwconfig or looking at dmesg? | nafizh wrote: | I love my remarkable 2. The only thing that's missing for me is a | backlight, it's unusable in terms of reading and writing if the | room is dark. I would instantly upgrade to a RM3 with a | backlight. | bradstewart wrote: | I use a good old fashioned clip-on book light with mine. Works | great. | throwaway_22wq wrote: | I bricked the reMarkable 2 within a day or two of receiving the | device. And since then it's been laying in the cupboard. I'm | grateful for the recovery write up by ddvk, but I'd really wish | Remarkable would make it a bit easier. I understand it's not | their problem, but looking through the physical recovery flow is | sadly utterly confusing if one isn't already a seasoned geek. | They really should provide the SSH password printed and an easier | way to reset the device. | | I'd love to give it a try soon. Unfortunately couldn't source the | required parts from any European online shop. Can anyone help | here or is AliExpress the only viable option? | greenhathacker wrote: | I used Adafruit for the USB micro breakout, and also a USB-C | breakout. Their USB-C breakout had SBU-2 but I couldn't get it | working (this was before I thought to flip the cable!). I | bought the larger breakout seen in that post from Amazon[1]. | | [1]: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08W3DYKX7 | guenthert wrote: | "The USB-C breakout board with the pull down resistor connected | on the bread board" | | Actually, it isn't. The resistor is in row 16 of the bread board, | the cable to the connector is in row 15. I'm sure, you just | wanted to test whether we're paying attention. | greenhathacker wrote: | Nice catch :) pushed an update. | jcun4128 wrote: | I got one for drawing sketches/designing stuff, I love the | drawing feel on it due to the textured surface. Light and lasts a | long time, I have a Surface Go 2 as well. | | R2 with eraser pen and folio was not cheap though. | 0xakhil wrote: | Can I use this as an ssh terminal to login to my development | machine? I wonder if the display latency would make it non- | starter for this usecase. | benjiweber wrote: | Kobos make good eink tablets for hacking. Run an easily | editable linux. e.g. | https://yingtongli.me/blog/2018/07/30/kobo-ssh.html | idorosen wrote: | My only regret about this device is that it seems to lack full | disk encryption on the device or any meaningful privacy | (encryption) for documents stored in reMarkable Cloud...which is | all of them if you want to use features like Screen Share (f.k.a. | LiveView). ReMarkable should not be able to access contents of | docs backed up from my device without my password or recovery | key, but AFAICT, there is no such protection whatsoever against | internal threats. | | Other than that, I love my RM2, just can't use it for as much as | I'd like because of the above. | Eeems wrote: | gocryptfs is available in toltec[0]. So you could in theory add | full device encryption behind a password on startup. I know | there has been some work on creating a UI for this kind of | setup, but I don't know if anyone has actually released one | yet. | | 0. https://toltec-dev.org/stable/ | mintplant wrote: | The UI stuff is here: https://blog.redteam- | pentesting.de/2021/remarkable-encryptio... | Eeems wrote: | That's one of the UI solutions You can also find the source | here: https://github.com/RedTeamPentesting/remarkable- | encryption. | | There is also https://github.com/plan5/remarvin | hvocode wrote: | I'm in the same boat. Due to security restrictions of my | employer I can't use cloud services to store work related | stuff. I was really bummed when I discovered that a lot of the | interesting features of my RM2 require their cloud service. | I've dug through the GitHub repos of RM2 hacks and open source | tools that are available, but it still feels like I'm missing | out. | jcun4128 wrote: | Can you not just use it as is? I have not connected to a WiFi | yet and you can sync to your own cloud. | | I guess you do need a way to get the docs on the device. | Their sync process is weird. | greenhathacker wrote: | I've never connected mine to WiFi, but that's because it | does all I need through ssh. | jcun4128 wrote: | Are you able to ssh and move files by something like sftp | or no? ssh by wire? Was curious what the file format is | of each note. | greenhathacker wrote: | Yep! When you plug it in to your machine through a USB-C | cable, it attaches as an ethernet device and answers to | `ssh root@10.11.99.1`. You can also activate an http UI | that you can then use to upload files with `curl --form | "file=@\"$1\"" "http://10.11.99.1/upload"`. | | If you're curious about the file format, have a look at h | ttps://remarkablewiki.com/tech/filesystem#user_data_direc | to... | jcun4128 wrote: | thanks a lot for the info | appel wrote: | That was quite a rollercoaster. | ChuckMcM wrote: | This just points out one of the more amazing things about the | reMarkable 2 is just how hackable it is. I have never had to do | this level of surgery on mine but I do enjoy the community | support for interesting scripts and such. | unexpected wrote: | This is anxiety-inducing and a good promo for the pinenote! | myself248 wrote: | The Pinenote can't arrive fast enough! I'm sitting on a | ReMarkable 2 that I hate because I didn't realize how serious | they were about crippling the usefulness of a really beautiful | stack of hardware. | | It's really, Really, REALLY dead-set against letting you do | anything useful like use wikipedia or stackoverflow on your | ultra-long-battery-life beautiful-display device that you | might, I dunno, want to use to look at reference material. | | Also Bluetooth is hardware-disabled, so no keyboard. What the | hell, people. After seeing all the hacks and stuff I figured | that might be possible, didn't learn otherwise until after | placing the order. Whoops. | Eeems wrote: | Wikipedia is kind of solved[0]. As for stackoverflow, you | might be able to use netsurf[1] already, I'm not sure how JS | dependent it is. | | 0. https://github.com/dps/remarkable-wikipedia | | 1. https://github.com/alex0809/netsurf-reMarkable | myself248 wrote: | Whoah, thank you! I had not run across netsurf in all my | looking. | bradwood wrote: | Nice -- shill us the Pinenote then! | | I'm in the market for an e-ink reader and have been | considering the RM2, but the Pinenote looks pretty tasty | too.. | [deleted] | sabidib wrote: | I ran into a similar problem as the author: trying to easily | extract highlights without having to go through ssh. | | I ended up building a cmdline tool to solve the problem and have | been using it for a while: https://github.com/sabidib/remarking | anthk wrote: | That's easy comparing to reflash a pocketchip and setting up a | pinning kernel because if you upgrade the NAND will bork out as | MLC+ubifs it's a recipe for a disaster. On similar ARM devices, I | own a wm8850 netbook (armv7l) and I coudn't reflash it with a | custom Uberoid "ROM" but oddly enough I could boot a custom | kernel and config with a Slackware 14 rootfs. Some port from | PostmarketOS exists (Tokio techbook), albeit is not for the same | model, but setting up a similar u-boot woudln't be too difficult. | My major issue is that that device is now semi-bricked and I | think I could restore it with PXE, as it doesn't show anything on | any reflashing trial. | nahtnam wrote: | Is this really worth $400 + $50-$100 for a pen? Why not just get | an iPad instead? | stonogo wrote: | Because I don't want one? This device does what I want. The | iPad doesn't. It's pretty straightforward. | codezero wrote: | Many people would be fine with that solution, it's definitely | more robust in a lot of ways. | | A few reasons I like my remarkable (I have an original and a 2, | and got my wife one): | | 1. forced isolation - no notifications come into this device | when I'm using it out of the box. It's a nice intentionally | crippled feature for focus. | | 2. The feel. It's like writing on paper, or very near to it. | The texture of the tablet and the pencil together is really ... | remarkable. It's not at all the same as writing on an iPad or | iPad Pro. | | 3. I doubt in a quantitative comparison the remarkable would | beat the iPad in latency, but it still feels damn good. | Surprisingly good compared to other touch screen/pencil | tablets. | | Gripes: | | - some edge effects when writing, loses some precision | | - the touch buttons on the original were more ergonomic for | navigation, the swipe gestures in the 2 seem to work 50-60% on | the first try. | | - replacing the nubs on the pencil is annoying, but I barely | made it through my first included package with the remarkable | 1, so not a _real_ problem. | | - software is rudimentary. A lot of quality of life features do | not exist and maybe should. The writing app, which should kind | of be the only thing given attention is pretty far behind, and | has only made small improvements (at least visibly to me, this | is not to diminish what I am sure is a lot of behind the scenes | work to make everything fast). | | I probably wouldn't jump to buy a third one, unless it had | physical navigation buttons, but the progression from 1 to 2 | was pretty amazing. The thing was already thin, but the 2 is so | thin I'm amazed it can house a USB-C port. | judge2020 wrote: | The sentiment seems to be that it's pretty bad value but many | like how hackable it is, with scripts and SSH access and such. | Semaphor wrote: | I'm pretty sure the iPad does not have an eInk screen? | [deleted] | Andrex wrote: | Not trying to shill too hard, but it's rare I fall in love with a | device the way I've fallen in love with my Remarkable 2. | | I can't say it was 100% worth the price (half was paid as a | gift), but everything about it is refreshingly elegant and | simple. | | Great to know recovering from a brick is possible too. | CPLX wrote: | I got one as well, almost mad at myself when I did because I | was 90% sure I would use it for a week and then never again. | | But I said what the hell. And I'm so glad I did, it's a great | device that definitely fills a niche in my workflow. I mostly | use it for brainstorming sessions. I like it a lot. I wish it | synced more seamlessly but perhaps that'll happen at some | point. | davidandgoliath wrote: | Me too! I thought it'd be a paperweight, but I immensely | enjoy it. It's esp. nice if you throw a custom calendar on it | (via reCalendar | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ys2fNQu0v0o&feature=youtu.be) | ryanianian wrote: | Killer app that I didn't know I needed: its built-in | screen-share feature lets you easily and reliably share the | tablet's screen with a desktop app over wifi. This has been | super useful for whiteboarding/diagramming over Zoom. | | (Older versions of the software had a very buggy | implementation that has since been fixed.) | bradstewart wrote: | I used to have nothing but trouble with the syncing features. | But it all seems fixed as of the last update--both in terms | of notebook/PDF syncing and the new ScreenShare, which | replaced the incredibly buggy previous incarnation of live | sharing. | aeturnum wrote: | I used a reMarkable 1 for my stint in grad school and it was | invaluable. A PDF reader that wasn't hard on the eyes. I also | really appreciated reMarkable's syncing software that let me | see the notes I made on a laptop without the lag of eink. | | That said, it seems clear that the reMarkable team is not | focused on the "taking notes on PDFs" use case. It works pretty | well just because reMarkable is a good reading and handwriting | platform, but it could be a lot better. | matheusmoreira wrote: | It's a really impressive product. The fact it runs Linux makes | it exceptionally interesting. | | > Codex -- A purposely designed Linux-based operating system | for low-latency digital paper displays | | I wonder how it works. Are the drivers proprietary? | Eeems wrote: | It's an eInk screen, so yes-ish. | | We get around this by just piggybacking on the build in | application's screen display routines[0] | | https://github.com/ddvk/remarkable2-framebuffer | Matthias1 wrote: | I had one for a couple weeks right about a year ago. I was very | impressed by its ability to mimic paper. Unfortunately, it | didn't do much more than mimic paper, so I sold it and bought | some nice notebooks. | | However, I think that was before the software projects | mentioned in this post. I never tried to SSH into it, so maybe | it's possible to use it for things that you can't replace with | paper. | 83457 wrote: | My main gripe is lack of direct bookmarking of pages in ebooks | or even listing jump links to highlighted areas. I like writing | on it but also want to use for reading large ebooks, | highlighting important info, and keeping notes in context. Not | realistic to do that if have to scroll through all pages. | heleninboodler wrote: | Bookmarks would be super nice. Also, a more secure way of | storing the stylus. When I slide mine into my backpack I have | a high chance of swiping the stylus onto the floor because it | knocks off very easily. A couple of times, I haven't noticed | and ended up going somewhere and being unable to use the | reMarkable because it was at home under my desk or couch. One | of these days I'm going to do that while I'm not at home and | I'm going to be incredibly annoyed that I have to buy another | $50 stylus. | 83457 wrote: | I have rm1 with the simple case marker slot. The rm2 magnet | approach is something that would have me constantly | checking to see if I lost it. | colecut wrote: | I haven't done it yet myself, but I've read it's fairly easy | to install KOReader on the Remarkable 2 to provide a better | ereader experience. Though when using this software, you | wouldn't be able to mark up the text or add notes in the | 'remarkable' way. | kadoban wrote: | It is indeed easy and very worth it. The rm2 is the _best_ | way to read text books and comics I've ever seen (using | koreader), and separately it's great for taking notes. | Those two uses don't really overlap for me so it's fine | that they're in separate OSes, especially because it's one | gesture to switch between them. | | The one and only thing that really bothers me about the | device is the storage is pretty small. It's fine for books, | but not great for comics, you end up having to swap out old | ones instead of just having your whole library available. | jonny_eh wrote: | > The rm2 is the _best_ way to read text books and comics | I've ever seen | | Comics? I thought it was black and white only. I'd assume | an iPad (or other tablet) was better for comics. | kadoban wrote: | The comics I read are grayscale anyway for 99% of pages. | YMMV if that's not true for your collection I suppose. | pvg wrote: | I tried this and promptly bricked it, although in a more | recoverable way than the OP. It's not hard to do it right | (I'd got some version of a dependency wrong) but there seem | to be few guardrails. I just convert epubs to pdfs now for | rm2 reading | ltultraweight wrote: | I installed koreader and I'm quite happy with reading long | books that way. | fsniper wrote: | koreader is my goto reader on RM2 too. If only the device | had a smaller size. | | I use 2 pages view in landscape mode. It's better, still | does not provide the comfort Kindle Paper White offers. | | Also some back/frontlight could be helpful. | namero999 wrote: | Joining the bandwagon of happy remarkable users. It's the only | device I own that respect my attention and focus. I use it | mainly to take notes of (paper) books I read and to send web | articles to it via its awesome browser extension. | dimal wrote: | I bought one and I don't understand the love. The device itself | is wonderful. It's great that you _can_ ssh into it and do | whatever. But by default, you can't even hook it up to | DropBox/iCloud/GoogleDrive/whatever. The only supported way to | get things off the device is by email, so in effect, in order | for it to be useful, you _must_ set up rsync or some other | custom process and risk bricking it and voiding your warranty. | I'm pretty sure I could do that safely, but for almost $500, I | shouldn't have to risk that. I returned mine. | callahad wrote: | > _you can 't even hook it up to | DropBox/iCloud/GoogleDrive/whatever._ | | Dropbox and Google Drive integration arrived with the latest | update earlier this month. | | > _The only supported way to get things off the device is by | email_ | | I think you're forgetting reMarkable's own built-in cloud | storage which syncs the device with the desktop and mobile | apps. Additionally, you can access a built-in web interface | on the device whenever it's connected to your computer via | USB. | pklausler wrote: | I'm glad that you enjoy yours. Mine has been sitting in my dead | technology drawer since about two weeks after it arrived. The | pen is too laggy, the contrast is too low for me to read PDFs | comfortably, and the note-taking experience doesn't come close | to what I get from a good pen and good paper. Nice try, but meh | from me. | cstejerean wrote: | Could have returned it for a full refund within 30 days. Any | reason you decided to keep it in the dead technology drawer | instead? | jakeva wrote: | I spent the money only to find out I don't actually take | notes in any form other than with a keyboard. I have used it | to do some sketching though, but I don't really do that much | either. | ngai_aku wrote: | I'll take it off your hands if you'd like ;) | pklausler wrote: | I thought about selling or donating it, but I have no way | to be confident that I've wiped it of all credentials and | content. | criddell wrote: | I'm just waiting for them to release a bigger one. I want | either US letter or A4 size. | Andrex wrote: | It's decent enough for sheet music at least. :) As long as | you have good eyes. | chefandy wrote: | Would you mind sharing a bit about you use case? Do you use it | for any sketching or artwork or primarily notes/etc? | Loughla wrote: | I'm not the OP, but I absolutely love my RM2. | | Use case: I work in a publicly funded institution where the | contents of my notes are often required for lawsuits, | settlements, and general FOIA inquiries on occasion. Being | able to carry around 50 different notebooks for various uses, | cordon them off from each other, and reproduce them in either | original form, or converted to text is a remarkable time | saver. | | The only thing it doesn't have that I desperately wish it did | is to be able to tag pages and search via tag. That would | make my life so much better. | | It's fun to draw on, but I'm a garbage artist. So it's | pleasant to be able to doodle while I'm thinking in meetings | and then immediately erase the doodle, but I don't use it for | more than that. | | Marking up pdf or other files is pretty great, too. | spockz wrote: | How well does text conversion work for you? Including the | search function? It works poorly for my colleagues. | | Does it have the option to straighten lines? Say that I | draw a box, will it make it square or a circle round? | | Are annotations to pdf searchable as well? | Loughla wrote: | So it works better than any other item with written to | printed text conversion that I've found. My handwriting | is especially bad, and I would say it has an 80-90% | correct rate, compared to my last system that I tried | (neonotes smartpen) that is light years ahead. That was | less than 10% correct. | | I have never used the search function. I do not convert | to text unless I have a specific use. This is why I wish | we could tag pages and search via tag - I had to create | my own recordkeeping system via headers that you can see | in the gridview to be able to quickly find what I need. | | >Does it have the option to straighten lines? Say that I | draw a box, will it make it square or a circle round? | | When you are drawing, it follows your pen. From what I | can tell, there is no 'snap to grid' or whatever option | that might be. That might be nice. If you are talking | about once you convert to text, it does not convert | drawings. | | Overall, the search is pretty terrible. Just adding tags | would alleviate that, and make this, for me, the perfect | tool for work. | Andrex wrote: | My primary use-case right now is storyboarding. The RM2 has | dozens of templates (notebook paper, grid paper, etc.) and | three of them are storyboard templates at various sizes. I | haven't been able to adjust to Wacoms etc., but drawing on | the RM2's display feels "right." I can zip through drawing up | storyboards and then email the PDF immediately to | collaborators. I can choose to send individual pages as PNGs, | too. Only small downside is lack of color, but that's the | eInk breaks. | | I also use it for annotating and displaying PDFs as well as | sheet music when practicing piano. I don't read many eBooks | on it because I have a smaller Kindle which has a light, | making it more versatile when I'm in the mood for reading. | | Hope this helps! | chefandy wrote: | It does-- thanks. Storyboarding is about the level of | graphic capability I'd need. I keep trying to adjust to | using my iPad Pro w/Apple Pencil 2. It's an incredibly | capable set of tools, but I just can't get comfortable with | it. | Andrex wrote: | I can't speak to iPads but the RM2 really almost feels | like paper, it's very close to having a real sketchpad. | LegitShady wrote: | My problem with it is that I'd rather have an iPad and a | cheaper e-reader to get access to many more apps and functions. | If it was 1/2 the price it would be at least interesting but I | use the iPad to read ebooks, to browse the web, to paint in | procreate, to sequence synths and record using an audio | interface, to watch YouTube in the kitchen or Netflix in bed, | and with a logitech keyboard work on documents in Microsoft | office. As I find new useful apps it becomes more and more | useful itself. | | The remarkable does cost less than the iPad but it has maybe an | 1/8th or a 1/16th of the functionality, and my Kobo reader cost | me less than $100 for most of the benefits of having an e-ink | reader. It lacks an app ecosystem and seems aimed as a tinker | device instead of an end user product. | | But I guess if you have to have a larger e-ink tablet the | remarkable seems to be the thing. | wedn3sday wrote: | I absolutely cannot read for any significant period of time | on an ipad screen, it kills my eyes. I love my rM2, but agree | that not having support for 3rd party apps seriously sucks, | its (IMO) the one thing thats really missing from the device. | LegitShady wrote: | Turn down the brightness, use something with an inverted | colour scheme, adjust the text size to something | reasonable, and don't read in the dark if you're doing that | | But as I said I also have a Kobo reader for reading on its | own, and it was very cheap compared to the remarkable. | shados wrote: | The point of a remarkable is to be an e-ink notebook to write | in. It has a few extra features, like, it CAN be used as an | e-reader, but it's not really its primary focus. | | So with that in mind, an e-ink reader doesn't make for a good | writing device, and an ipad is lacking the wacom style e-ink | tablet. | | Is it overpriced for what it is? Yeah, probably, that's the | curse of small batch hardware in the world of Google and | Apple. | | But an ipad and an e-reader don't really replace it's niche. | If you're cool with the writing experience on an ipad, then | the Remarkable is essentially useless to you. | | Personally, I really, really love my Remarkable 2 (I also had | the original, but the 2 is way better). | LegitShady wrote: | Imho the only thing the iPad loses over Wacom is the shape | of the pen (my pro pen 2 is head and shoulders more | comfortable to use than the apple pencil). The remarkable | pen is not much different than the apple pencil. Wacoms | strength is their application support/drivers support which | remarkable doesn't have and iPad has its own ecosystem. I | suppose also that you can get very large tablet displays | with Wacom too while the iPad tops out at roughly 13". | | Facebook has been pushing ads for this device at me since | it was available and each time I look I can't imagine why | anyone would want one except that they have money to burn | and time to waste beta testing on something that doesn't | have an ecosystem but has a low power screen. | | Amazon is already a major consumer of eink screens and | could eat their lunch tomorrow and close the whole company | down in a year. There's no future for it without an app | ecosystem and a more compelling reason to exist | | An iPad and an e-reader do much more than a remarkable for | not that much difference in cost. I dont see a long term | future for their company or product | necovek wrote: | I don't have a rm2, but I am intrigued by all the praise | for the paper-like feel of the pen/screen combination: | have you tried it and not noticed any difference, or are | you simply talking based on the specs? | | Honestly wondering because it's too expensive to be an | impulse buy for me, on top of not being available to my | country, so I'd have to jump through hoops and pay extra | to get it locally, but I am hoping I can replace gobbles | of paper with one device like that. | LegitShady wrote: | I got a matte screen protector for my iPad with a similar | feel. Neither the iPad with the paperlike protector nor | the remarkable actually feel like paper, but they do feel | better than drawing with a plastic pen on a glass screen. | My 16" Wacom display tablet also has something similar | applied from factory to provide a texture to it | necovek wrote: | To further clarify, you have actually compared reMarkable | 2 (and not reMarkable 1, which was never equally praised) | to all the other devices you mention? | | (Basically, that would make me not get a reMarkable 2 | before I can try one out, and if my impression matches | yours, I wouldn't bother and would instead wait out for | PineNote) | LegitShady wrote: | given another poster's post in this page describing their | return experience, I would advice you to not a get a | remarkable 2 until you can try one in person no matter | what people say. | shados wrote: | Remarkable 1 was pretty similar to the 2 in that respect | (most of the wins of the 2 are unrelated.) | | I don't really agree with the previous poster. Drawing on | a Remarkable really feels much better than alternatives | (similar to a Wacom tablet, which imo is pretty unique), | no matter which kind of screen protector you put on it. | | I've only tried an Ipad Pro once, but it really wasn't | close. | | There's also the battery that's nice. I only need to | charge this thing once in a blue moon (more often than a | Kindle, but still). Because of WFH I haven't used it as | much (I prefer typing my notes if I can be at my desk. I | use my tablet on the go), and using it only a few minutes | here and there the battery's at 60% after several months. | LegitShady wrote: | it feels like drawing on an ipad with a matte screen | protector. depending on the screen protector they have | slightly different feels. overall it doesn't feel like | paper, it just has more friction than drawing on glass | with a plastic pencil tip. | naikrovek wrote: | is it bricked if it can be recovered? bricking, the way I learned | the term, means unrecoverable via any software means and almost | any (or actually any) hardware means. | comeonseriously wrote: | Right. Same here. But, like waterproof vs water resistant, | people don't seem to use the term correctly anymore. | loloquwowndueo wrote: | Back in the day "bricked" meant it was actually and permanently | about as useful as a brick - no chance of recovery. These days it | just seems to mean "can't boot and can't be fixed/reflashed | easily". | | Having to plug a resistor into the device to put it in any sort | of recovery mode does walk a very fine line between "not really | bricked" and "dude you squeezed water out of a stone, you are a | demigod". | MaxBarraclough wrote: | HN has seen many discussions over the proper meaning of | _bricked_. [0][1][2][3] | | I think it's because it's an ambiguous metaphor. Does it mean | _currently only as useful to you as a brick_ , or does it mean | _as objectively valuable as a brick_. Personally I prefer the | original stronger definition, where recoverable issues do not | count as _bricked_ , but so it goes. | | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20379772 | | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20381892 | | [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25731376 | | [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22845778 | MrGilbert wrote: | One might call it "soft-bricked". | ansible wrote: | "soft-bricked" is a common term in some of the Android forums | I have frequented in the past. | | The Remarkable 2 is very nice, I would like to try one out, | though I don't have any immediate use for something like | that, except maybe as an e-reader. | | I still use paper notebooks, but I rarely need to actually do | something with the contents afterwards, other than refer to | them occasionally. Maybe if I was more organized... | deepdmistry wrote: | I am open mouthed | cortesoft wrote: | Isn't `bricked then recovered` a contradiction in terms? | aidenn0 wrote: | given that the term "unbricking" exists, I would say no? | cortesoft wrote: | If you can fix it, it wasn't bricked it was just not working. | aidenn0 wrote: | If you have to de-solder the flash, reprogram the flash and | re-solder it back in, is that bricked? | | If yes to above, then what about using an in-circuit | programmer? | | If yes to above then what about having to move a jumper to | get a ROM monitor? | | If yes to above then what about having to enter some magic | button combination at boot? | | The line is fuzzy, no? | cortesoft wrote: | Yeah, I think you are right. I am convinced. I would | probably draw the line at physical work, meaning if it | requires physically opening the device and | changing/fixing/bypassing wiring it can count as bricked. | jiveturkey wrote: | Well, I mean, that is a reasonable line. But it's still | moving the goalposts. I'll stick with bricked meaning | bricked. | | I lost that personal battle for 'hacker' and 'begs the | question' but dammit I am sticking to it for 'brick'!! | cortesoft wrote: | > I'll stick with bricked meaning bricked. | | Well that is what I am sticking with, too! | qzw wrote: | The term "undying" also exists, just saying. | revolvingocelot wrote: | This. "Bricked" is a word that signifies that the speaker | doesn't know how to make the device go. It's not exactly | meaningless, but I certainly take it differently coming from | a grognard as opposed to a Pakled. | n0cturne wrote: | Generally I'd say yes, but when recovery includes a breadboard | and soldering I think 'bricked then recovered' is acceptable! | cortesoft wrote: | Fair enough. I have changed my mind on unbricking being a | thing. | hellotomyrars wrote: | I absolutely think the term gets overused and I think the term | "soft-bricked" is even more peculiar. | | But given the extent of the required work to recover the device | here (actual hardware work, non-trivial and not for a | layperson) then I think it's appropriate. | | Not a hill I'm going to die on but it does kind of bother me | when someone describes their device as bricked and all they | need to do is plug it in and run some kind of simple restore | utility or otherwise. | capableweb wrote: | Things that were once thought bricked might in the future | become unbricked if the right knowledge is acquired. "Bricked" | is more a state of "thought to be impossible to fix" than | something permanent. | cortesoft wrote: | That makes sense, especially since there is an | epistemological issue with being able to say something is | 'bricked'... there would be no way to distinguish between "I | don't know how to fix it" and "No one knows how to fix it" | fouc wrote: | I think "bricked" as a term originated from flashing the | firmware on mobile phones. If the firmware ended up in a non- | recoverable state, the phone became as useful as a brick. It | was theoretically possible to take physical intervention to | pull the firmware chip out and flash it with an fpga programmer | tool, but most people wouldn't have the equipment for that. | zbuf wrote: | I think we've been using this term long before mobile | phones... | | This feels a bit like the word "bug"; I'd be quite interested | to know if it can be traced to its actual first use. | | People associate it with phones because as I remember they | were always being described as the size (and weight) of a | brick, and that's when they were working. | RicoElectrico wrote: | A decade ago I managed to brick my brother's Nokia 5300 (custom | firmware - PPM mods) and thankfully recovered it by "dead phone | USB flashing" - the last resort method in Phoenix, Nokia | internal software for service people. It's super finicky and | works on n-th attempts, but has a non-zero change of success. | edoceo wrote: | > works on n-th attempts, but has a high change of success | | 60% of the time it works every time. | RicoElectrico wrote: | Just get lucky with the timing :) Like a QTE but without | the prompt, that was the main problem. But as programming | was done in parts (firmware, PPM (like Win32 resources), | content (FAT32 image of storage) it depended on which part | was corrupted. | | Edit: some people had success on 50th attempt[1], talk | about perseverance ;) | | [1] http://nokiahacking.pl/naprawianie-niewlaczajacego-sie- | telef... | Someone1234 wrote: | Bricked is a [current] state (wherein there's no official | recovery workflow available, and the device is as usable as a | brick). | | To give an example, certain dead devices can be saved after | being baked in the oven to re-seat components that have worked | loose. According to the "No True Bricking" argument that | constantly comes up, those devices were never really bricked | because they were later fixable, even though you're literally | performing a re-manufacturing step. | | In fact what exactly would a "True Bricking" look like? Even in | cases where a major component dies, if you desolder it, and re- | solder a new one is that a "True Bricking?" | | See I have zero patience for the "No True Bricking" stuff since | it is a logical Swiss cheese. | matheusmoreira wrote: | The requirement for electronics knowledge and skills is a | clear dividing line for me. | | I've recovered and hacked devices for friends using software. | Especially phones which have recovery functions I can use but | I've also hacked some older game consoles. I can't do | anything if electronics skills are required though. At that | point it becomes specialized repair work. | | I suppose nothing's really bricked if you're smart enough. | Just desolder a chip, reprogram it and resolder it back in? I | don't know how. I tried to learn what I could but it turned | out hardware is _a lot_ harder than software. | cortesoft wrote: | You obviously have some patience for it because you spent the | time to make some pretty good arguments as to why you can | unbrick something. I think you have me convinced. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-27 23:00 UTC)