[HN Gopher] Vintage Byte Magazine Library ___________________________________________________________________ Vintage Byte Magazine Library Author : cion Score : 183 points Date : 2021-09-28 16:07 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (vintageapple.org) (TXT) w3m dump (vintageapple.org) | ajmarsh wrote: | I love the cover art of the early editions. They really were | things of beauty at least to me. | | https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1980-11 | ddingus wrote: | I love them too. Always did. Great art, relevant, thought | provoking. | cblconfederate wrote: | I grew up in tech-hostile environment but somehow i got to buy a | few volumes of byte in the 90s. I remember reading Jon Udell's | column and for some reason liking his expose of web technologies. | It is so weird , i even remember certain sentences. It's fair to | say that I owe him my web 'career' | UI_at_80x24 wrote: | One of my fondest memories of BYTE is why I have the career I | have today. | | It was a how-to discussing making your system more secure against | a virus (boot-sector/TSR). | | It explained how to edit your io.sys, and command.com; so that | the system would use different files then: config.sys & | autoexec.bat to boot. | | I failed at this task, and learned a very hard lesson about | backups, but it wasn't as painful as it could have been. Format & | re-install was rather common back then too (1-3'ish months on | average) | | But I learned that I WANT to hack on my systems. I learned that I | COULD run MY hardware how I wanted. It opened the world to me. | | I do not accept a system as it's presented to me, I must find the | edge-case and break-out of the conforms that would keep me | contained. | | I also learned about the difference between obscurity and | security too. And that combined they are greater then the sum of | their parts. | twinge wrote: | The predictions for the future of computing, December 1996, had | some truly prescient gems. And a few misses. | | > We may experience a gradual drift into a surveillance society | ... | | > The merging of cellular phones, portable computers, and | highspeed networked servers offers many exciting possibilities. | | > The Internet will be as ubiquitous in our lives as cable | television is today. | | https://vintageapple.org/byte/pdf/199612_Byte_Magazine_Vol_2... - | page 86 in the magazine, page 90 in the PDF | nunez wrote: | Looking at some of these, it's kind of sad how it went from a | deeply technical magazine (the earliest publication had an ad to | join ACM, and it has several circuit diagrams) to a pop-tech | supermarket mag (with tons of ads, lots of high-level hit pieces | (how to get ready for y2k, for example), and A BAJILLIONTY ADS. | I'm glad that they kept some semblance of technical content | towards the end. | ddingus wrote: | It is sad. Tech pubs ended up on one hell of a grind to stay in | the game. I am glad for what we did get though. The golden era | was a tech goldmine! | Koshkin wrote: | Many initially interesting publications have suffered the same | fate. As a more recent example, Ars Technica is getting there. | JKCalhoun wrote: | You're describing the industry. | gootler wrote: | archive.org has a lot more and a lot better. | EarlKing wrote: | This is well timed. I was actually going over the Internet | Archive's collection just the other day. It's a bit sad to watch | the decline in quality as you move through the volumes. Somewhere | around 1985 - 1986 BYTE shifted towards becoming just another | magazine hocking hardware/software. It got so bad that some | issues started to look like a rip-off of Ziff-Davis's PC | Magazine. Around that point I'm betting a lot of BYTE readers | left for greener pastures at Circuit Cellar Ink and Dr. Dobb's. | cblconfederate wrote: | People complain about ads , but browse any volume and count the | number of ads (may be easier to count the number of non-ads). And | you had to pay for that stuff. | ddingus wrote: | Remember, paying for that stuff had value in those times. | People would buy directories and or pay for advice / direction | from others in the know too. | | Was hard to understand all that was going on out there. The ADS | made more sense in that way than they do now. Sometimes, when a | specific product was needed, those ADS connected people up in a | way everyone found to have value. | | One thing, perhaps missed today given content marketing, was | following the ADS to see who did what. New products, old ones | phasing out, where things were, who, and sometimes pretty good | reasons why all were found in those ADS. Scanning them was not | all fluff. (not always fluff I should say, because yeah. There | was fluff) | hanche wrote: | But those ads are static. They have no animated gifs or videos, | having to rely on typography and still images to catch your | attention. As a result, they are much less intrusive. | | More importantly, they couldn't track you, nor did their | selection rely on any knowlege of you (besides the fact that | you were reading byte magazine.) | datavirtue wrote: | People like ads in magazines because they are relevant and | informative of the progress of the industry. I learn nearly | as much from ads reading "Fine Home Building" as I do reading | the excellent technical articles. | amelius wrote: | I agree with you, except some of the ads were loose inserts | that fell out when you shook the magazine, which was almost | as annoying as animated gifs/videos. | timthorn wrote: | The ads were really valuable. Back in the day they were one of | the main ways of learning what was available. | cpr wrote: | Nostalgia! | | Was an early editor/writer for Byte in the very early days (first | few issues), though had to back off due to school load (in | college at the time). | | Carl Helmers and Dan Fylstra (founder of VisiCorp (publisher of | VisiCalc), friend from high school days in San Diego) and I were | all working at Intermetrics in Cambridge, and got together to | start Byte, visiting Wayne and Virginia Green (big ham radio | publisher at the time) in New Hampshire. | | I only played a minor role, but it was definitely a lot of fun. | rbanffy wrote: | Thank you. I read it for years. In college we had an extensive | collection that went back many years and I lost count of how | many hours I spent reading them in the library. | ddingus wrote: | Thanks for whatever you did. BYTE, for this small town kid, | opened up a world of computing! | | Great publication. I sure wish we had something similar | today... | | Heck, I would take it printed. | DannyB2 wrote: | Download old BYTE magazines from here: | https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Byte_Magazine.htm | | Or higher quality scans here: https://archive.org/details/byte- | magazine | | Or Popular Electronics: | https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Popular-Electronics-Gui... | | Creative Computing: https://archive.org/details/creativecomputing | JKCalhoun wrote: | Yes, American Radio History is one of my favorite sites (to | hoard from). | | Lots more than just Byte and Popular Electronics. | pcf wrote: | Many 404 errors for the PDF links. Just FYI. | aplc0r wrote: | Though the magazine was largely before my time, I have an art | print of the cover for the May 1981 [1] issue and it makes me | smile every time. | | [1] | https://vintageapple.org/byte/pdf/198105_Byte_Magazine_Vol_0... | jandrese wrote: | It is incredible what percentage of an issue of Byte was full | page ads. They should have been paying the readers. | | It's also striking to see street addresses in the ads, some of | which are local to me. One company used to do advanced graphics | display controllers for computer kiosks in what is now a custom | cabinets store in a dingy run down strip center. | | https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9306426,-77.237681,3a,75y,17... | jjarvis wrote: | I would love to see a reboot of Byte Magazine even if it only | came back in digital form. | datavirtue wrote: | I still get magazines...mostly for the building trade. Fuck | digital. There is something about print that makes people get | their shit together and produce quality content. You can't just | wing it with some fluffy clickbait and Google ad-sense. | rchaud wrote: | A digital-only publication cannot survive without playing the | same content strategy games as all the other publications out | there. | | A new BYTE would quickly start diluting its value by offering a | podcast, YT channel, IG/Snap Stories, affiliate links and a | website slathered with Adsense ads. You'll wonder why they | bothered rebooting it in the first place. | ddingus wrote: | Or... It's subscription only, and maybe those other things | don't matter so much. | datavirtue wrote: | No one can resist adsense. "Yeah let's just skip out on | that $50k a month, our customers don't want to see all | those ads." The incintive, like free money for corporate | stock buybacks, is just irresistible. | Diederich wrote: | I've always found the advertisements at least as interesting as | the actual content. | cristoperb wrote: | Here's what's available on archive.org: | | https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine?&sort=date | | I'm not sure what's missing there, but it sounds like this | collection fills in some gaps. | Thoreandan wrote: | It looks like some content from vintageapple is already donated | to IA https://archive.org/details/macbooks | makeworld wrote: | The ones this collection has should definitely be uploaded. | ChrisArchitect wrote: | From a couple years ago maybe? | | Some other Byte mag convos lately: | | week ago on cover art | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28607038 | | Logo language issue https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28603556 | | another cover archive | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26453783 | blondin wrote: | thanks for sharing! | | just recently re-read the sep, oct, and nov 78 issues on | implementing tiny pascal. what a cliffhanger! they were like send | money for the listing of the 8080 machine translator (which is | what i was most interested in haha) | Sunspark wrote: | I miss those days so much. 80s computer magazines were exciting. | The web is great, but it doesn't have the anticipation of waiting | for the next issue and then sitting down to dig into it with | focused attention to see what was fresh and new and to be wowed | by all the things you couldn't afford. A 20 megabyte hard drive | for ONLY $1000? That's a good price! Unimaginable luxury, I only | had floppy disks into the 1990s. | | I am someone who used to type in code from a magazine before I | knew what the SAVE command was. You would never see someone doing | something like that today. | | "In 1983 an average of one new computer magazine appeared each | week. By late that year more than 200 existed." | | 80s computer magazines were thick too! Compute! magazine | published 392 pages in December 1983. | dhosek wrote: | I remember how shocking it was when _SoftTalk_ came out. It | didn 't have program listings in it! | rcarmo wrote: | Well, getting this up on HN certainly re-kindled my nostalgia for | dial-up connections - the images are loading piecemeal, and the | table is slowly growing as it's laid out... | | But wow, to read Jerry Pournelle's column again. | datavirtue wrote: | This reminds me of the unconstrained optimism and ambition of my | youth. Like Byte, all of that is gone now. | | Thank you for the work. | discreteevent wrote: | Looking at one of these now I remember how magazines made | technology very exciting (I don't think it was just because I was | younger). I think a lot of it was down to the visuals. You just | won't get illustrations like that on someone's blog. The | illustrations made the technology seem more real and certainly | more glamorous. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | I don't think it was just because we were younger. I also don't | think it was just because of the visuals (though those helped). | I think a lot of it was because things were moving so fast. | | The 386 was an astonishing improvement over the 286. But now, | the next generation Intel chip is... kind of nice, I guess? But | it's not all that exciting. | | Windows 95 was a _massive_ improvement over Windows 3.0. | Windows 11 doesn 't make many people very excited compared to | Windows 10. | | A 20 Meg hard drive was _miles_ ahead of floppies. But the last | storage improvement was... nice, but not life-changing. | | Hercules graphics was massively better than stock IBM PC | graphics. The latest graphics card is exciting if you're a | gamer, I guess, but it doesn't move the needle much for | everyone else. | | And so on. It was eye-opening every month to see what was new. | It doesn't feel like that any more. | datavirtue wrote: | Yeah. $10k on a machine that was old hat by the time it got | dusty and people just kept buying and buying. We will never | see anything like that again. | | I got my hands on well over $20000 worth of computers before | I was 18 from hand-me-downs. You couldn't hardly resell used | computers because they were so out of date by that time...the | reason people got rid of them. | | If it had not been for the used computers and all the churn | (enthusiast grandfather in charge of tech for the family | business) I would have never laid hands on one and most | likely would have ended up in construction. | dhosek wrote: | I think the HDD vs floppies comparison is more sensibly | analogized to SSD vs HDD. That was a massive change. I think | the Apple Silicon vs Intel upgrade is pretty exciting | (although a lot of that feels like promise of what might be | coming in the M2 and beyond), but yes, it's definitely a | different world than it was in the 90s which was probably the | period of most rapid technical advancement in personal | computing. | Koshkin wrote: | > _SSD vs HDD. That was a massive change._ | | On a tech level, sure. But not something the majority of | users have even noticed. (Less noise, maybe.) | | > _Apple Silicon vs Intel upgrade_ | | I've had a hard time explaining to someone the meaning of | this (and why they should care). | | So, no, there is no comparison to the level of innovation | and the general excitement around the computer tech they | saw back in the 80s. | dhosek wrote: | The speed difference is really quite dramatic. When I | replaced the boot hard drive on my Mac Mini with a SSD | after it died, it was an immediately obvious increase in | performance. | Scramblejams wrote: | Agree. I started with personal computing in 1983 and what was | so exciting about that time, I think, was that _each new | generation of hardware could do something incredibly cool the | prior generation fundamentally could not_. I remember feeling | a nearly constant level of excitement about tech, always so | stoked to see what was coming next and what incredible new | capability it would bring to the table. | | And Moore's Law didn't hurt either, those clock rate | increases! | | Today's tech is amazing, but the progress is mostly | incremental and that doesn't tend to get the blood pumping. | ddingus wrote: | It was screaming fast! | | We went from a discussion on how many colors a machine had, | whether it flogged a speaker for sound, or had an actual | sound system, to multi-media excellence, and it happened | QUICK! | | I sure enjoyed my trip through those times. | | But, there may be more to come! | | Custom silicon is on it's way back around the computing | circle of life. The way I see it, the different options we've | seen hold fairly stable for a decade or so have all converged | on similar ground. Differentiation is sometimes more | contrived than actual, like the software, or form factor of a | device, maybe it's ports, mean more than the actual computing | potential it has. Additionally, we've somewhat peaked in | terms of sequential compute, and things like multi-media are | fairly ordinary, and of sufficient quality many don't see a | big distinction between pro efforts and gear and consumer | grade gear. Or, it just flat doesn't matter. | | And now the dam is breaking! | | To gain advantage, and also lock customers in, leverage | mindshare and data, other investments users have or are | making, custom silicon is looking very appealing now. | | On top of that, the bigger players have the resources to do | the development, more of what people need to know about doing | it is out there, and tools are more available now to the | point where mere mortals can play in this game. | | A quick look at something relevant? | | Consider the Parallax Propeller 2 microcontroller chip. It's | done on an older process, 130nm I believe. On that process, | the creator and team managed to get an 8 core, 300Mhz plus | design with a lot of features. That project took a decade or | so, and north of a million. While high, that's not out of | line compared to what it all was just a short time before. | | Chips are done, available for people to buy and build into | projects / products. It's a custom design with particular | emphasis on real time, parallel or concurrent programming, | and data streaming, measurement with all I/O pins capable of | analog or digital operation. For some applications nothing | will come close. A great example of what can be done now. | | The bigger players have all done, or are working on custom | silicon for one reason or another. AI, network, computation, | etc... | | Soon, we are going to head back to something closer to that | era. More highly differentiated devices / machines. Maybe | there is room for the kind of work BYTE did in some form... | | But, whether that happens or not, we may well see custom | silicon push things forward again in dramatic ways. | pcamen wrote: | Hey guys, Peter here from vintageapple.org. My server is | experiencing a bit of a hug of death from this. Please be kind | and don't try to download everything all at once. I've had to | apply a rate limit to that site for now to make sure the | applications I'm hosting continue to work. | akvadrako wrote: | Another source for Byte covers is https://pestingers.net/pages- | images/antique-computers/byte-m... | AlbertCory wrote: | "Launching" a software product consisted of taking out an ad in | the back pages of Byte. | | Lotus 1-2-3 was considered revolutionary in marketing circles | because they spend $1M on _their_ launch. | Waterluvian wrote: | My dad gave me one from the 70s and I left it as reading material | in the back seat of my car. | | Any time I took coworkers to lunch it was the catalyst to a lot | of conversation. | | It's fun to regularly peer into the past and be reminded of what | has changed and what hasn't. | dfphil wrote: | Back in the 70's I read kilobyte, excuse me, baud. But Byte | magazine was cool, too. | pronoiac wrote: | Aw, I have a copy of the 1988 Byte issue on Lisp that I ought to | scan and contribute, though probably to the Internet Archive, as | I'm not sure how to send it in here. | abecedarius wrote: | One of their last really good issues, including a version of | this condensed intro to SICP: | https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6064/AIM-986.... | (if that's the issue I'm thinking of). | | I had stopped subscribing by then because it was getting more | "consumery". | kaycebasques wrote: | Tangential: does anyone know of a comprehensive scan of 1990s | Wired magazine? | tyingq wrote: | I don't know why it these aren't bundled with similar tags or | in a collection, but this Internet Archive query gets somewhat | close: | https://archive.org/search.php?query=subject%3A%22wired%22%2... | | Edit: Better query that seems to mostly get Wired Magazines | from 1990-1999. 63 of them, so not all of them, but quite a | few. | | https://archive.org/search.php?query=title%3A%28wired%201990... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-28 23:00 UTC)