[HN Gopher] iPhone remains findable after power off ___________________________________________________________________ iPhone remains findable after power off Author : chetangoti Score : 142 points Date : 2021-09-29 12:50 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | Animats wrote: | But if they actually turned off power, they'd lose track of where | you are. They'd lose the tracking information needed for | marketing. Can't have that. | | Does "airplane mode" still shut off all transmitters? | gtirloni wrote: | Do you have any evidence that location tracking actually works | when the phone is turned off (even with the Find My Phone | feature enabled)? | jareklupinski wrote: | it definitely could have been worded better: | | "You iPhone continues to report its location to Apple when it is | powered off" or something | | seems software has gone back to extremely hostile user-facing | strings, after about a decade of "oopsie doopsie our system had a | crashie" | avianlyric wrote: | > You iPhone continues to report its location to Apple when it | is powered off" or something | | This statement wouldn't be true. The iPhone broadcasts crypto | keys over Bluetooth, which other I devices use to encrypt the | detected location and upload to Apple. | | But the only thing capable of decrypting those encrypted | payloads is other devices attached to the same iCloud Keychain. | | So Apple has no idea where your phone is, and there's also no | guarantee that a location will ever be uploaded. | kevinventullo wrote: | "You think you really know what's going on? | | They passing laws where they can run up in your own home | | Cameras on your laptop, TV and your iPhone | | The battery don't come out, that means it's always on" | | - B.o.B., "Paper Route", 2013 | | One might call him a conspiracy theory rapper. He once got in a | Twitter feud with Neil deGrasse Tyson on whether the earth was | flat. | [deleted] | mrtksn wrote: | It's NOT an iOS 15 feature. | | I have an iPhone without a SIM card that I use as a test device | and it happen that yesterday I left it in my backpack, together | with an AirTag in the car. Shortly after I walked off, I got the | AirTag notification as expected(the left behind notification). | What I did not expect though, was to see the test iPhone also | having an up to date location in the Find My app. That iPhone has | no network connection, so I assumed that somehow it must have | connected to my daily iPhone's hot spot. | | And today, I learn that iPhones are capable of sending location | even when turned off. So I checked the Find My setting, it's | right there on iOS 14.4.2 on iPhone 7. | | It's pretty cool, very aggressive tracking. Maybe we need clothes | with faraday cage pockets for occasions when we don't like to be | tracked. | jaywalk wrote: | It doesn't connect to your iPhone's hot spot, but your daily | iPhone is able to detect the other iPhone's presence just like | it detects AirTags and logs that info. | mrtksn wrote: | Yes but apparently other iPhones can also detect it and send | the location just like with the AirTag even if the iPhone is | turned off. That was a surprise. | avianlyric wrote: | Was the phone actually off or just missing a SIM card? | elzbardico wrote: | That's the whole point of the feature: being able to track | a phone that has been turned off. If you're afraid of FBI, | CIA or Mossad tracking you with this feature, you can | disable this on settings | mrtksn wrote: | Nope, I'm happy to be tracked. I actually enabled Google | Maps to track me all the time because I would like to be | able to look back at Google Timeline[0] and see where I | have been at particular time in the past. | | Since a few years, I'm in Turkey and I know that in this | country the GSM operators track your location constantly | and keep the records indefinitely. How do I know that? | Well, in Turkey every SIM card is tied to a proven | identity(ID scan is required even for pre-paid SIMs) and | getting the GSM signal records to prove whereabouts of | someone at particular time has become a standard practice | on criminal cases. Everyone is well aware of being | tracked by the govt. With Apple and Google, I at least | get something out of it. | | [0]: https://timeline.google.com/ | EastOfTruth wrote: | Everytime I will hear Apple talking about being pro-privacy, I | will keep laughing. | tartoran wrote: | Wonder what else it does or reports to the homebase. Why stop at | location data? It's weird how it the surveillance apparatus | creeps up slowly and gets accepted without much protest. It's | just like the proverbial frog in the boiling pot | ajconway wrote: | As stated in https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/data/en/find-my/ | Apple (or any other third parties) cannot access the actual | location data in the Find My network directly. It is supposed to | be only decryptable by your other devices. | | That is if you trust Apple to design and implement everything | correctly. | bellyfullofbac wrote: | > Ford flipped the switch which he saw was now marked "Mode | Execute Ready" instead of the now old-fashioned "Access Standby" | which had so long ago replaced the appallingly stone-aged "Off". | | - Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy | chewmieser wrote: | Apple is very clear that this is how things work now. They even | give you a dialog prompt now to inform you of this change the | first time you try to shut your device off - | https://9to5mac.com/2021/06/07/ios-15-find-my-network-can-fi... | | I'm not sure why this is presented as some new thing, or a gotcha | or whatever this is. We've known about it for months... And IMO, | it's a positive change although it does sound a little weird. | sneak wrote: | "very clear" is an overstatement. TFA is an industry-leading | expert expressing surprise at this state of affairs. | notyourwork wrote: | What is not clear about the message that says exactly what | this? | ElectronShak wrote: | I'm generally of the impression that any phone with an | unremovable battery is never truly "off" at any given time, | unless the battery is totally damaged. | | PS: I like phones whose batteries are removable, currently use | a Nokia Android with a removable one. One advantage is that | when the phone drops down, it disintegrates, frame from | battery, decreasing the overall impact on the phone. | eth0up wrote: | A fair impression to remain under, I think. | | I remember using a low-energy bluetooth scanner and noticing | a strange mac that shouldn't have been present. I really | wanted to know wtf was broadcasting it. I searched and | searched looking in stupid places. Eventually I settled down | and began thinking clearly and looked at my speaker. Yeah, it | was as off as the power button could make it, though still | on. A good toss across the multi-acre yard and the signal | faded accordingly. | Bilal_io wrote: | Maybe they started showing the warnings recently, but this | practice was in place for at least a few years. I remember | reading an article by a journalist who was on a trip and his | iPhone died. Later he discovered it still logged his locations, | not only when off, but when dead (I assume the iPhone is | designed to shut off with some juice left) | macintux wrote: | Logging locations and being remotely findable are two | separate features. | jackson1442 wrote: | Agreed. Of all the messiness in iOS's settings app, it's | honestly pretty easy to find the setting to turn this off | (iCloud > Find My > Find My network). The Twitter thread almost | reads like someone who's trying to not understand what's | happening. | | Not to mention the fact that there's a reminder of this setting | every time you turn your phone off, which can be tapped to | disable this behavior. | sixbrx wrote: | Settings -> (Your Name/Apple ID ...) -> Find My -> Find My | iPhone -> Find My Network in latest iOS. | dylan604 wrote: | Does 5 levels deep count as easy to find? | Johnny555 wrote: | The setting to tell my phone to turn all the way off when I | turn it off is in under "iCloud" settings and is called "Find | my network", and that's considered "pretty easy to find"? | avianlyric wrote: | No, the giant dialogue that appears when you turn off the | phone, and tells you how to disable the feature is pretty | easy to find. | Johnny555 wrote: | What did the parent poster mean when he said _" it's | honestly pretty easy to find the setting to turn this off | (iCloud > Find My > Find My network)"_? Or are you | disagreeing with him that it's "pretty easy to find" in | the settings? | hungryforcodes wrote: | Wow, first I've heard of it. Seems to be enabled by default too | -- I think users definitely are not "clear" about it. | wlesieutre wrote: | The "slide to power off" prompt literally says "iPhone | Findable after Power Off >" right under it every time, but | 99% of users will never see it or care about this feature | because no one ever turns their phone off. | | But if you're one of those few people who does turn the phone | off, it says right there, and you can tap on it to shut down | to unfindable state this time instead. | | Note that it requires a passcode to disable, which is key to | this feature. If someone steals your phone it will remain | findable unless they open it up and pull the battery. | illegalsmile wrote: | Not that it really matters but mine does not say "iPhone | Findable after Power Off" under the slider and I have find | my iPhone enabled on 14.8. | wlesieutre wrote: | 14.8 won't be findable after power off, it's an iOS 15 | feature. When "turned off" it can maintain an occasional | bluetooth beacon like AirTags which other iPhones pick | up. | illegalsmile wrote: | Thanks, that makes sense. I don't immediately upgrade so | I haven't seen that yet. | kennywinker wrote: | Running 14.7.1 and the Find My network setting says that | it will enable my iphone to be found when turned off, but | the power off screen does not say anything about that. | avianlyric wrote: | You might want to double check the text under that toggle | in 14.7. I'm pretty sure it says: | | "Participating in the Find My network let's you locate | your phone even when it's _offline_ " | | It don't it says anything about what happens if your | phone is off. | dunham wrote: | Which model? I don't see this on my XR (iOS 15), maybe it | doesn't have the hardware for it? | | > If someone steals your phone it will remain findable | unless they open it up and pull the battery. | | Or drop the phone into a faraday bag? | hug wrote: | > I don't see this on my XR (iOS 15), maybe it doesn't | have the hardware for it? | | It does not. iPhones 11 or newer. | hungryforcodes wrote: | I turn off my phone but never that way. It either runs out | of power or I hard reset it. Either way I don't want it | spying on me. | ArchOversight wrote: | > Either way I don't want it spying on me. | | It literally isn't spying on you, it's allow you to find | your after you've lost it. | serf wrote: | >It literally isn't spying on you, it's allow you to find | your after you've lost it. | | almost no mobile device has a feature that is 'literally | spying on you'. | | the problem is when the devices have so many features | that they can be easily turned into a consummate spy | device by any nearby paying agency. | | in other words : no mobile device is spying on you, but | the people who control them definitely do, and they're | often willing to sell the rights to do so to groups that | are poorly vetted -- using a device with less | capabilities necessarily gives the controlling party less | options by which to gather data for whatever reasons they | may be compelled to do so. | | so.. the phone, lacking sovereignty , does not spy on | you; but it's a big leaky gps/imu-enabled microphone | camera that sits in your pocket or purse all day, and the | list of groups with access to that leaky data-pipe | increases every day with little concern and little reform | regarding data retention policies and ownership rights. | avianlyric wrote: | I'm not entirely sure what your point is here. Clearly an | sophisticated electronic devices full of sensors and | radios can be used to track you, I don't think anyone on | HN disputes that. But that issues seems rather orthogonal | to topic at hand. | staplers wrote: | Either way I don't want it spying on me. | | Unfortunately iOS is filled with call-homes to apple | servers with all sorts of telemetry data. You can "turn | off" exact lat/long coordinates (location data), however | your cell provider can triangulate your position and | apple can triangulate via wifi/other Apple products. Read | about how Airtags work. | breakfastduck wrote: | This is nothing to do with iOS. | | A cell provider can triangulate any phone connected to | its network. | katbyte wrote: | > Either way I don't want it spying on me. | | then turn it off? most people will want this, and for | those who don't it's easy to turn off. | wlesieutre wrote: | Hard reset doesn't have anything to do with this since it | turns back on afterward. As far as letting the battery | die, I think it's going to be much more common that | someone loses their phone, the battery is dead, and this | helps them figure out "whoops, I left it at the bar we | went to after dinner." | | The power reserve for this only lasts a few hours, but if | you don't want that feature you can turn it off. | baybal2 wrote: | Some Android phone do this too to let NFC being usable when the | phone is off. | madeofpalk wrote: | Yeah, there's a reasonably visible message "warning" you of | this, which has a prompt to turn it off. | | I actually thought this was _very_ old, added a year or so ago. | I guess it got delayed? | | I've had two phones stolen (right out of my hands) that were | immediately shut down and sim cards ejected to prevent them | from being tracked. While I'm sure this feature wouldn't help | me get back a phone, I hope it does deter this. | | Edit: I think this was announced back in 2019 WWWDC | https://www.wired.com/story/apple-find-my-cryptography-bluet... | ? | baby wrote: | It was just added a few days ago, not a year ago. | AniseAbyss wrote: | The police in my country wouldn't even bother to check, they | have rapists and drug dealers to deal with. | roywiggins wrote: | Your police investigate rapes? Ours don't. | | https://www.wnyc.org/story/nypd-misled-public-about- | response... | gremloni wrote: | This comment could not be anymore hyperbolic. | rurp wrote: | Yeah I'm baffled by all of the comments saying that this is | great as an anti-theft feature. I don't know where people | live that that's the case, but I sure as heck have never | known police in the US to give a damn about $1000 property | crimes. They don't care about $20000 home robberies and car | thefts, even with strong video or other evidence. I can't | imagine they're going to start chasing down criminals to | get a used phone back unless it's for the mayor's kid or | something. | sparker72678 wrote: | It serves as anti-theft insofar as it makes it more of a | pain generally to be in possession of a stolen phone. | | But yeah the police are not going to go get your iPhone | back for you. | krrrh wrote: | That aside, there was a massive decrease in iPhone thefts | when activation locking was introduced with the original | "find my". | | Something like this could further deter the portion of | thefts that end up funnelling through shady resellers. | handrous wrote: | Police in the US don't investigate any but _very_ expensive | property crime against individuals, either. And I don 't | actually know that they investigate _very_ expensive | property crime--I just assume they do. Certainly mid-five- | figures of theft from multiple locations by one crew with | tons of video evidence isn 't enough to get them | interested, beyond taking the report. | | ... unless your country _is_ the US, in which case, yeah, | true. | EastOfTruth wrote: | > And IMO, it's a positive change although it does sound a | little weird. | | It's a negative change that I didn't know about and yes, it is | weird/wrong. | rewtraw wrote: | I prefer to be able to locate my lost phone even if its | powered off. | mavrc wrote: | i'd like to be able to store a phone on the shelf with a | properly conditioned battery, to be able to disable the | radios during flight, or frankly anywhere else I don't want | to be located. | | Interesting how different people have different desires. | EastOfTruth wrote: | ok NSA | calyth2018 wrote: | Not exactly new. | | The old BlackBerries allows you to "turn off" the device and have | the alarm wake you up. It basically drops into a low power mode. | | It was easy to make a phone dead. You yanked out the batteries. | KirillPanov wrote: | This is a feature of any device with a battery-backed real time | clock (RTC). All x86 machines have this feature. | | Pretty much anything with a clock that doesn't need resetting | every time you turn it on can do this. An RTC chip is just a | super low-power counter, and it costs almost nothing to toss in | a wake-time comparator, so all of them do. When you set the | wake-time alarm the host CPU really does power down 100% -- | right after it sets the RTC chip's wake-time registers. | | This is a long, long, long way from a microcontroller. It's not | Turing-complete and has only a few dozen bits of storage for | the counter. They're also manufactured on incredibly ancient | fabrication processes (like 350nm until very recently) for | lowest possible leakage. | easton wrote: | The old BlackBerrys didn't even do a full OS startup unless you | did a battery pull, I think the "clean" shutdown just | hibernated it at best. | thepasswordis wrote: | This is awesome, and is a cool enough feature to actually make me | upgrade. Love it. | pornel wrote: | I hoped for some analysts of how it's implemented (there's | probably a lot of clever low power pings and cryptography | involved), but the linked Twitter thread is purely "WTF? Get off | my lawn!" | todd3834 wrote: | This article has me wondering if I've ever turned my phone off | besides restarting it or the battery died. I'm sure I have but I | bet it is very uncommon. | | That being said, if it were off and lost, this feature would be | amazing. Apple is very transparent about it and also allows you | to disable it as far as I remember. | | The OP has a follow up tweet that iOS 15 made their phone hot | during charging. Kind of feels like they might just not be having | a good time with their new iPhone or is trying a little too hard | to capture some Apple outrage attention. There are better things | in the ecosystem to complain about in my opinion but to each | their own. | bdcravens wrote: | My phone has always run hot after an OS update or syncing to a | new phone. My understanding is that the CPU is ramping up | during that time, reindexing and the like. | jaywalk wrote: | > trying a little too hard to capture some Apple outrage | attention. | | Exactly the vibe I got. | rjh29 wrote: | There is an obvious trend on HN turning against Apple since the | image hash stuff. Search 'Apple' in the last month and you'll | see stories about Apple screwing over blind people, copying | other people's ideas, screwing over employees, removing apps | from the app store, disabling FaceID if you try to change the | screen etc. | | From my POV (a non-Apple user) they have not changed, they have | always been pretty anti-consumer. But even I can see that most | of these stories have a clear agenda and are exaggerated to | capture the current anti-Apple outrage sentiment. That kind of | discussion doesn't do anyone any favours. | MerelyMortal wrote: | It's helping show people that "they have always been pretty | anti-consumer". | dawnerd wrote: | The heat part is especially weird considering androids also go | scorched earth when fast or wireless charging. It's just got | phones work currently. And their point about losing 15%, after | an update all phones are going to do reinfecting. My Samsung | flip drops battery like crazy when not doing anything too. | Phones are one of those grass isn't greener things. | brewdad wrote: | > This article has me wondering if I've ever turned my phone | off besides restarting it or the battery died. I'm sure I have | but I bet it is very uncommon. | | I turned mine off on a 6.5 hour flight when I wanted to ensure | I'd have battery later and knew I wasn't going to use it for | entertainment in-flight. That's really the only time I've | turned my phone off in the past few years. | zzyzxd wrote: | To use this feature, you have to turn on Find My Network in | settings (it is on by default), turning it on also means the | device will report other nearby Find My devices like AirTags. | | I like to have my phone findable after power off, but I am still | not sure whether I want my phone to report other devices. | avianlyric wrote: | Out of interest, what's your concern with your phone reporting | the location of other devices? | CalRobert wrote: | Phones can be used to eavesdrop even if turned off, as revealed | in court proceedings against the Genovese family in the | mid-2000's. Called "roving bugs" I think. | | https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2006/12/8343/ | numpad0 wrote: | This kind of behavior is needed for: | | - Public transit and digital IDs. It sucks when phone dies and | you can't get out of a station or show your driver's license. | | - Power management. Power buttons on modern phones are digitally | controlled by a microcontroller because actually switching main | power by those buttons can glitch the phone. | | - Firmware updates. Phone has to be able to handle USB connection | to accept new firmware. | | - (probably more) | | It's nothing new. Just that it does wireless too now. | zootboy wrote: | There's nothing that requires a microcontroller to be active | during power-down to handle the issues you describe: | | For transit passes and IDs, there need to be non-phone-based | ways of handling that issue. It's equally possible to lose / | have your phone stolen. Talk to the station agent, or have the | police look up your license by name / address. | | There's no need for a continuously-running microcontroller to | read the power button. It's perfectly possible to have the | power button feed power directly from the battery to a | bootstrap power management IC, which then takes over supplying | power to the main processor. | | USB connections supply power, so it's easy to implement having | the presence of power on the USB port boot the phone. | avianlyric wrote: | > For transit passes | | It's interesting, here in the U.K. you have a legal | obligation to present a valid ticket upon demand for any | train you travel on. Failure to do so for any reason | (including my phone died, or I dropped the ticket) is a | criminal offence (and I mean _criminal_ , not civil) | punishable by a prison sentence. | | Some ticket conductors at the end of a long shift hearing | endless excuses about why someone doesn't have a valid ticket | really aren't interested in negotiating. They're quite happy | to enforce the law, and make your life a living hell in the | process. | | Personally I much prefer it if the transit pass on my phone | keeps working after it dies. The alternative is very... | _inconvenient_. | grishka wrote: | > Public transit and digital IDs. It sucks when phone dies and | you can't get out of a station or show your driver's license. | | Yeah there's no way I'm using my phone for this stuff even if I | had that option. I don't trust batteries, wireless networks and | modern software enough. I do use Google Pay, but I always have | the physical card just in case. | sudosysgen wrote: | If someone steals your phone all they have to do so you won't | find it is to wrap it in aluminium foil. | katbyte wrote: | and keep it wrapped till they get to their hideout which is in | a faraday cage and then proceed to wipe it and bypass the | activation lock. | | it's another hassel for thieves which imho is a good thing. | Might as well argue "why lock you door when all someone needs | is a bump key!" | rad_gruchalski wrote: | So does my car. And? | rootusrootus wrote: | That's handy. And I am glad that it tells you when you power | down, so there are no surprises. | hyperstar wrote: | wtf?! is this true of 5s as well? | pfranz wrote: | I think there's a hardware component required. Unless it's only | in a beta OS, I have and Xs and I see a different wording for | that setting. Mine omits "and powered off." | hyperstar wrote: | Why? wouldn't it just be a matter of activating a low-power | mode and turning off the screen? It's been said a long time | that this is done by certain malwares. | avianlyric wrote: | Your hardware needs a low-power mode to activate, before | you can activate it. | | All of the iPhone "off" features, like express transit | cards and find my use dedicated low power hardware that | seems to be capable of running the feature without an | active CPU telling it what to do. | pfranz wrote: | I found an article that specifies phone models and explains | why[1]. It's iPhone 11 and 12 because it requires a UWB/U1 | chip. This thread (via Craig Federighi)[2] asserts UWB | isn't the part that's used, but those phones have a newer | Bluetooth chipset. | | [1] https://beebom.com/how-find-lost-iphone-turned-off- | erased/ | | [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/iOSBeta/comments/otcn02/iphone | _rema... | kosasbest wrote: | An iPhone Remains Findable After Power Off ... except when you | put it in a Faraday bag when not using it | [deleted] | elzbardico wrote: | Well, unless you're living under a rock this has been | exhaustively discussed when this feature was launched. | lucb1e wrote: | I click every global tracking network link out there and am on | HN daily and often more time than I perhaps should. This is the | first I hear of it. Yeah I _really_ need to get out from under | this rock and spend more time on HN. | bernardv wrote: | One day Apple will sell a stylish iHammer to securely power off | the damn thing. | renewiltord wrote: | Great feature. Love it. Got the notification when I first turned | off my iPhone 13. | AndrewStephens wrote: | Umm, isn't this, like maybe, a good thing? If I want my very | expensive iPhone found, I want it found whether it is on or off. | | If people are worried about being tracked maybe they should carry | around a device that is always broadcasting radio signals to | third party towers. | arthur_sav wrote: | If YOU want that option, that's fine. However, why force | everyone to use this? From the comments is seems Apple is | pretty aggressive with it and you can only turn it off | temporarily. | sbuk wrote: | It's only on if the 'Find My' feature is enabled, and then it | can be disabled. | otterley wrote: | Because most customers do want this feature. It's not being | "forced," it's just a default. | satysin wrote: | It's not "forced" on you at all. You can disable it with one | setting change. | breakfastduck wrote: | Since when did something being a default setting become | something being 'forced' upon users? | AndrewThrowaway wrote: | Off should mean off. Sleeping means that it can be woken up, | woken up means that it microphones can be turned on and etc. | defaultname wrote: | For the vast majority of people in the vast majority of | situations, it's a very good thing and is ideal behavior. It is | only in conspiratorial "but what if nation states are tracking | me" noise that this is cast as a bad thing. | krageon wrote: | Maybe you don't want to be tracked sometimes, and you expect | turning off your device to turn it off. | [deleted] | riddleronroof wrote: | Yes, exactly this. Imagine a reporter going through an | unfriendly country's airport. | Tagbert wrote: | then their location is known anyway | pfranz wrote: | I've found iPhones way too fickle to trust them to stay off. | If you plug in a charger or tap the power button they power | back on. If you don't want to be tracked turn off your phone | and put it in a faraday bag. | Jtsummers wrote: | I would expect tapping the power button would turn most | devices with a power button on. With respect to charging | it, for most users that's probably the correct behavior. | There are 2 reasons people seem to turn off (not just | airplane mode or disabling some things) their phones: | | 1. To preserve a low battery or because the battery has | died. | | 2. To fully disable the device. | | (1) is by far the most common of the two. In that case, | once it's charging then turning back on automatically is | the desired behavior. In the case of (2), if you have a | strong motivation (avoiding detection, for instance) then | you'd presumably have done a bit of research or noticed | that this happens and make deliberate choices around how | you use and charge the device. | pfranz wrote: | > I would expect tapping the power button would turn most | devices with a power button on. | | I believe I was thinking of my older phone. Tapping the | home button, perhaps even the volume buttons, would turn | it back on. On my Xs, I have to hold down the power | button for a few seconds before it would turn on. I find | this a bit more reliable if I want my phone to be off for | awhile. | madeofpalk wrote: | > you expect turning off your device to turn it off. | | When you turn your phone off there is a message that states: | iPhone Findable After Power Off > | | Tapping that shows an alert with a description: | iPhone Remains Findable After Power Off Find | my helps you locate this iPhone when it is lost or stolen, | even after power off The location is visible in | Find My on your other devices and to people in Family Sharing | you share location with. You can temporarily | turn off Find My network and it will resume when this iPhone | is turned on again [OK] [Temporarily Turn Off | Finding] | | Seems very clear about setting expectations about exactly | what your phone will be doing when you turn it "off". | OneLeggedCat wrote: | Mine has no such message, and I'm on iOS 15. I just tested | it. Any idea why? | ceejayoz wrote: | Head to the "Find My" section in the settings, click into | "Find My iPhone", and see if "Find My network" is on or | off. | | If it's off, you won't get the disclaimer, because it's | not active. | TillE wrote: | That setting is enabled for me on iOS 15, and yet I have | no such message on the power off screen. | | slide to power off, Emergency SOS, Cancel | | That's it. Nothing appears after I turn it off either. | ceejayoz wrote: | Interesting. I'm on 15.1 beta, so perhaps there's a | difference. Is it possible the "Find My network" isn't | supported on some phones? | sbuk wrote: | Look at the text under "Slide to power off"... | avianlyric wrote: | I don't think all devices support it. My iPhone XS | doesn't show the message, and under the find my toggle it | says "Participating in the Find My network let's you | locate your phone even when it's _offline_ ", rather than | when it's _off_. | diebeforei485 wrote: | It's only supported on iPhone 11, 12, and 13 series. | amimrroboto wrote: | What situation are you going, "I don't want big tech to be | tracking me right now"? | krageon wrote: | Every situation, but I was trying to frame it more softly | because I was expecting a large percentage of these | comments to say "I don't just not mind being tracked, I | want it now!" and similar thoughts. | nixgeek wrote: | Given the prevalence of geofence warrants nowadays, I don't | think the situation needs to be especially nefarious in | nature. Perhaps you don't want to be scrutinized just | because you and 370 others were within 300 yards of a crime | occurring? | | https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/16/geofence- | war... | jdavis703 wrote: | My understanding is the power off tracking uses NFC. This | is encrypted. If Apple's documentation is to be believed, | the location information cannot be decrypted by law | enforcement. | contravariant wrote: | All of them. | poo-yie wrote: | Or use a case that functions as a Faraday cage. | Terretta wrote: | Then leave the phone at home. Because knowing which | _cell_ a _cellular_ phone is in, is how it works: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_tracking | vorpalhex wrote: | What situation are you happy to let your location data be | sold? Will you give the rest of us your location data? | lucideer wrote: | Exactly. For example, when you're a phone thief. | tdy_err wrote: | Or the target of a malicious actor. | vorpalhex wrote: | Or you're an activist attending a protest. | NineStarPoint wrote: | It's almost strictly better to leave your phone home in | that sort of circumstance though. Your phone looks like | you stayed home all day, and you don't need to worry | about things like whether any information gets sent out | despite being "off". | vorpalhex wrote: | Ideally yes. However, people need to communicate and | coordinate. Even arranging transportation may be an issue | without a phone. | Someone wrote: | I think you would have to leave your phone home a lot | more often than on days you don't want to be nailed to | where you are. | | Imagine a case where evidence puts you near a protest or | crime scene while your phone is home. That's coincidence, | but if your phone also was home _only_ at the three days | three similar events happened, it becomes circumstantial | evidence. | jdavis703 wrote: | Most of the time protests in America only start involving | law breaking, riot police and mass arrests after the sun | goes down. I'd never endorse perjury, but an argument of | "I decided to spend the evening inside" seems like it | ought to be pretty reasonable for most people. | bowmessage wrote: | Won't phone thieves just have some faraday bags to pop | their winnings into? | ceejayoz wrote: | Dedicated ones, yes, but their numbers have declined | significantly now that the phones can be activation | locked. | | Opportunistic ones likely won't have such a thing. My | wife's phone was once stolen by someone at a hospital | lab... _after_ they 'd checked in their kid. It was a | fairly easy job for the cops to track that down. | sbuk wrote: | You can remotely brick it. The minute that the thief | tries to do anything with the device, it's functionally | useless. It needs to be online to be reactived, and if | the device is marked stolen, it won't activate. | silicon2401 wrote: | Think of the children! | | A more reasonable, good-faith understanding would also | account for people who don't want to be tracked. I keep GPS | and any location tracking on with all my devices because I | don't want them to have any more data on me than I can | avoid. | lucideer wrote: | The original commenter was proposing that there's | multiple perspectives. The replies were all completely | ignoring this and adding nothing substantive to the | discussion, so I thought a short jokey reply would | suffice. | | To be serious though: there's a lack of acknowledgement | of the functional benefits of tracking by those | advocating for control and privacy in this particular | instance. The fact is as long as Apple's closed walled- | garden is offering actual value to users (FindMyPhone | works, and works well, for the common use-case most | "consumers" experience day-to-day), while open | alternatives are actively sticking their head in the sand | around features like this, then closed solutions will | prevail. | | What's needed is proper discourse on the challenges of | e.g. providing practical asset management features that | bad actors cannot easily overcome, while at the same time | ensuring full user control over their own device and | privacy. This is a real world challenge _without_ easy | answers: "just turn it all off all the time" is an easy | answer, and a cop-out. | | If we want to provide quality solutions to e.g. | activists, those solutions need to be mature and | practical. | CountDrewku wrote: | Ah the ol' innocent people have nothing to hide argument. | Been used by bad faith actors for centuries. | exabrial wrote: | No. A device thats "off" should be "off" 100% of the time. When | the device wakes it realizes it's been stolen, only then should | it reach for home. This behavior can/will only be exploited by | hostile nations and other bad actors. | ubercow13 wrote: | Then turn it off. Personally I'd like it on. | madeofpalk wrote: | I guess that's why it's an option, with (IMHO) a reasonable | default of being enabled. | | It's a useless feature against theft if it can just be turned | off the thief. | nixgeek wrote: | You're both correct, but Apple is optimizing for the majority | with their 'Find My' network, where the majority don't have a | threat model which includes exploitation of a target by a | nation state actor. | | It's a toggle in Settings to turn off this functionality for | those who want the surface area reduction, or an RF shielded | bag if you don't trust the toggle ;) | avianlyric wrote: | Most devices never "wake up" after being stolen. Apple's | activation lock means that most stolen iPhone are only good | for parts. | | If your threat model includes nation state actors, then you | should probably be putting electronics in faraday bags if you | don't want to be tracked. For everyone else, the design of | the Find My network provides significant protection against | misuse. | draw_down wrote: | What use would this be if a thief could just power off the | device? | lmilcin wrote: | Per my understanding this has nothing to do with actual security. | | I think nobody steals smartphones anymore for the smartphone | itself. Mainly because they are either getting locked or are | easily tracked. That is poor business. | | What is happening in practice is thieves take sim card out of the | phone and try to use it to steal from the owner as much as | possible. Log in to bank account, reset passwords on social | accounts and ransom money, etc. | sigjuice wrote: | eSIMs should help avoid this scenario, right? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-09-29 23:01 UTC)