[HN Gopher] To Be a Field of Poppies: turning cadavers into compost
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       To Be a Field of Poppies: turning cadavers into compost
        
       Author : Petiver
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2021-09-30 03:38 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (harpers.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (harpers.org)
        
       | foobarian wrote:
       | One similar possibility I was considering are FBI body farms
       | where scientists study various properties of decomposition to be
       | able to solve crimes better. At least I saw it on CSI. How cool
       | would it be to be one of the corpses there :-)
        
         | BrianOnHN wrote:
         | Super cool http://forensics.usf.edu/humandonation/
        
       | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
       | This is not new. In the Jewish religion, the dead are buried
       | without any embalming, cremation, or anything else except a plain
       | cotten or linen cloth.
       | 
       | Even the casket is unadorned pine wood, without nails, metal,
       | plastic, or paint. Wooden dowels are used to hold it together.
        
         | mauvehaus wrote:
         | New England Casket was one of the major suppliers of Jewish
         | coffins until they had an 8 alarm fire in 2019. Sadly, they've
         | folded the tent in the wake of that. There's a good video about
         | the company and their products made before the fire that's
         | worth a watch.
         | 
         | https://www.universalhub.com/2015/east-boston-where-jewish-c...
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | Minor49er wrote:
         | This is already mentioned in the article:
         | 
         | "No wonder embalming is considered desecration in some
         | traditions, including among Muslims and Jews, who bury their
         | dead in shrouds or simple coffins, sometimes without nails or
         | fasteners, to avoid obstructing the decomposition process."
        
         | huetius wrote:
         | There seems to me to be a substantive difference between the
         | monotheistic attitude towards the dead body as an object of
         | reverence, and this, in which the body is an object of use.
         | 
         | It may have historical precedent, but I don't think these
         | things are the same.
        
         | markdown wrote:
         | What do they have against nails?
        
           | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
           | Nails do not decompose. The idea is to return to the earth
           | nearly the same way you arrived out of it.
        
       | qwerty456127 wrote:
       | I always adored the idea of recycling dead flesh instead of
       | preserving it the way it's commonly done but there is a danger to
       | consider: prions - they can get into the soil, then into the
       | plants and then into the animals.
        
         | tsimionescu wrote:
         | I don't think that's a major problem, as prions are as old as
         | life as far as we know and have not been the source of major
         | problems, with the only known exceptions being caused by
         | widespread cannibalism (such as a few villages or the cow-based
         | cow diets).
         | 
         | In fact, one of the oldest organized religions in the world,
         | Zoroastrianism (the religion of ancient Persian empire)
         | disposes of their dead by putting them atop Towers of Silence
         | [0] to be eaten by vultures, which has not been any source of
         | problems as far as I know.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Silence
        
           | gremloni wrote:
           | I don't think this works. No one eats the vultures so it
           | would be hard for the prions to make it back to humans.
        
         | MomoXenosaga wrote:
         | The safe and hygienic disposal of corpses is relatively new in
         | human civilization and we're still here.
        
         | jillesvangurp wrote:
         | Prions are a minor risk when you eat them. So, maybe don't grow
         | tomatoes on the grave of your loved ones. Though, I suspect
         | that would actually be perfectly safe since plants don't tend
         | to pass other pathogens despite what we feed them (i.e.
         | manure).
         | 
         | Otherwise, composting is the most natural thing there is.
         | Absolutely everything in nature dies, and mostly does not get
         | embalmed, cremated, etc. Which is another way of saying it
         | composts and gets recycled back into living stuff; some of
         | which ends up in our food chain. Things like proteins are
         | broken down in the process. And that would include prions.
         | 
         | So, absolutely nothing wrong with composting the remains of
         | people. It's a nice ecological alternative to carbon intensive
         | cremation processes or having a lot of nasty embalming fluids
         | dumped into the local environment (which is where it ends up
         | after the body eventually decomposes anyway). Not judging here;
         | but I appreciate people making different choices and being
         | somewhat conscious about not burdening the environment with
         | their corpses any more than is strictly necessary.
        
           | dogorman wrote:
           | I'd guess tomatoes are fine. I'd definitely think twice
           | before eating carrots or potatoes from such a garden though,
           | even washed and pealed thoroughly (and normally I wouldn't
           | peal those.)
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | Embalming always seemed ridiculous to me.
        
             | Koshkin wrote:
             | Wasn't this merely part of a religious ritual?
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | My understanding is it was a moneymaker for the
               | morticians, who managed to get laws passed requiring it.
        
           | schemescape wrote:
           | I'm not as quick to dismiss the risk. A brief read of the
           | Wikipedia article on prions has some concerning claims:
           | 
           | > All known prion diseases in mammals ... are progressive,
           | have no known effective treatment, and are always fatal
           | 
           | > In 2015, researchers at The University of Texas Health
           | Science Center at Houston found that plants can be a vector
           | for prions. When researchers fed hamsters grass that grew on
           | ground where a deer that died with chronic wasting disease
           | (CWD) was buried, the hamsters became ill with CWD,
           | suggesting that prions can bind to plants, which then take
           | them up into the leaf and stem structure, where they can be
           | eaten by herbivores, thus completing the cycle.
           | 
           | Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prion
           | 
           | Source 1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC33918/
           | 
           | Source 2: https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2015/06/researchers-
           | make-surp...
        
         | amatecha wrote:
         | Wow, well that was a thing I didn't know about. Cool, yet
         | another disturbing way nature wants to make things terrible for
         | me, haha :(
         | 
         | Two "fun" excerpts from the Wikipedia page about Prions[0]:
         | 
         | > Experimental evidence shows that unbound prions degrade over
         | time, while soil-bound prions remain at stable or increasing
         | levels, suggesting that prions likely accumulate in the
         | environment
         | 
         | > It is thus possible that there is a progressively
         | accumulating number of prions in the environment.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prion
        
         | tw04 wrote:
         | Seems like that should be pretty easy to stop. Birnessite can
         | break down prions[1] and isn't particularly rare (assuming they
         | don't already account for that).
         | 
         | [1] https://news.wisc.edu/common-soil-mineral-degrades-the-
         | nearl...
        
           | Confiks wrote:
           | Beware of overly optimistic university press releases. It's
           | hopeful, but certainly not a panacea. In fact, it's not clear
           | if it will work at all.
           | 
           | From your link: "The new study (...) was conducted on prions
           | in solution in the laboratory". "The next step (...) is to
           | mix the mineral with contaminated soil to see if it has the
           | same effect". "I expect that its efficacy would be somewhat
           | diminished in soil".
        
         | robbrown451 wrote:
         | This suggests composting (mostly) inactivates prions:
         | https://cen.acs.org/articles/92/web/2014/05/Composting-Offer...
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | theodric wrote:
       | This is what I want. Don't bury me on my farm, let me become part
       | of it.
        
       | mauvehaus wrote:
       | Becky Chambers explores the idea of composting humans in Record
       | of a Spaceborn Few. It's the third book in her Wayfarer series,
       | but I think it would work as a stand-alone novel if you aren't
       | looking to read two books before you get to the one that
       | discusses composting humans.
        
       | mmastrac wrote:
       | 0.75m^3 is a lot more than I expected. What happens with the
       | Mercury in fillings? Or is that small enough that it no longer
       | matters?
        
         | takk309 wrote:
         | Just thinking off the top of my head, bioaccumulation is a
         | thing for sure but I don't know how much that it comes from
         | soil. Mercury is naturally occurring in various minerals,
         | although not directly biologically available. Mercury fillings
         | are the same way, not readily available for uptake by your
         | body.
        
         | jillesvangurp wrote:
         | Compared to all the other mercury we put back in the
         | environment. We're talking a few grams here. And it doesn't do
         | much damage while it's in your mouth either.
        
         | CoastalCoder wrote:
         | Just guessing here, but: perhaps whatever prevents the mercury
         | from entering a patient's bloodstream over the course of his
         | life, will continue to work in the soil?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-01 23:01 UTC)