[HN Gopher] Crews are abandoned on ships in record numbers witho... ___________________________________________________________________ Crews are abandoned on ships in record numbers without pay, food or a way home Author : bryan0 Score : 240 points Date : 2021-10-08 16:52 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com) | h2odragon wrote: | Not related but I have to mention it: | | There's a picture of a "garden" bucket in the article, with an | obviously just bought fresh onion on top of the dirt. I guess to | communicate its "garden"-ness. | | I cant help but wonder, if its OK to stage small details like | that to be more favorable to the narrative, ... where is the line | drawn? | kevingadd wrote: | The owner of the bucket could have taken that photo when it was | new. Can imagine posting that on social media "just made my | first garden bucket!", or having a series of photos from points | in time to show the progress | tdeck wrote: | That onion has clearly sprouted a lot, so perhaps it's a seed | onion? It's not uncommon to buy small seed onions and plant | them so they'll get bigger (although I personally don't see the | point, and would grow small bunching onions instead). In this | case it's probably just an old onion that sat in a bag too long | and sprouted, so they decided to plant it. | h2odragon wrote: | no roots. its bought. | tdeck wrote: | It's not a "just-bought" onion. What grocery store sells an | onion with an eight inch sprout coming out of it? At least | in the U.S. such an onion would be unsellable, which is why | I think they found this one in a bag somewhere and decided | to plant it. | h2odragon wrote: | https://www.walmart.com/ip/Green-Onions- | Bunch/51259361?athbd... | | Its not a sprout; its _fresh_. | tdeck wrote: | Are we looking at the same photos here? It's clearly not | a green onion. It has a large round bulb on the bottom | that's more than two inches wide. Green onions / | scallions do not look like that. You can see that in the | very image you just linked. | m0zg wrote: | Sounds to me like people will have to overthrow their governments | to "go back to normal" anytime soon. The lack of normalcy | increases the power of those imposing lockdowns and restrictions | dramatically, and they aren't going to let go of that. There's no | precedent for any government ever willingly ceding significant | power. Just watch "V for Vendetta" - it's the same thing, except | in the movie it was called the "St. Mary's virus". Incredible | foresight. | jollybean wrote: | Companies need be insured for ABC if not, illegal to go anywhere | near a port in a rich country. | sytelus wrote: | It looks like our demand/supply ecosystem was setup with | negligible buffers and unprepared for any big disruptions. This | is a chain reaction that might go on for quite some time. | Meanwhile prices of goods is getting pretty crazy! | thedigitalone wrote: | Paywalled https://archive.is/TX6lA | pluc wrote: | I don't understand why this content is allowed. Without a | subscription it's literally just an ad for a subscription. And | I'm not going to buy a subscription for the three articles I | read every month. | lelandfe wrote: | Once they start blocking archive.is I'll probably care more | dundarious wrote: | It's a major national US newspaper -- many, many people have | subscriptions. | rob74 wrote: | Well, I live in Germany, and I'm not going to subscribe to | a major national US newspaper just for the few articles | that get linked here. If they had a micropayment | alternative for single articles I would consider it | however... | dundarious wrote: | Which is all fair enough. I'm opposing pluc's point that | this type of post should perhaps be disallowed: | | > I don't understand why this content is allowed. | | It's certainly an appropriate post for a US-centric | forum. | detaro wrote: | > _I don 't understand why this content is allowed._ | | Because a workaround is available. | | > _And I 'm not going to buy a subscription for the three | articles I read every month._ | | Then click the link in the comment you replied to and read | it. | erellsworth wrote: | Tie all the abandoned ships together and turn them into a | floating city where the only law is the law of the sea. I mean, | we're aiming for full on dystopia aren't we? | perl4ever wrote: | Milton Friedman's grandson is on it: | | "Friedman and Gramlich noted that according to the United | Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, a country's Exclusive | Economic Zone extends 200 nautical miles (370 km) from shore. | Beyond that boundary lie the high seas, which are not subject | to the laws of any sovereign state other than the flag under | which a ship sails. They proposed that a seastead could take | advantage of the absence of laws and regulations outside the | sovereignty of nations to experiment with new governance | systems, and allow the citizens of existing governments to exit | more easily" | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasteading | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seasteading_Institute | | "The project picked up mainstream exposure after PayPal | cofounder Peter Thiel donated $500,000 in initial seed | capital[4] (followed by subsequent contributions). He also | spoke out on behalf of its viability in his essay "The | Education of a Libertarian"" | | Patri Friedman is described as a former Google employee, a | transhumanist and rationalist, and a very good poker player. | | "Since attending the Burning Man festival in 2000, Friedman | imagined creating a water festival called Ephemerisle as a | Seasteading experiment and Temporary Autonomous Zone. Through | The Seasteading Institute, Friedman was able to start the | Ephemerisle festival in 2009, aided by TSI's James Hogan as | event organizer and Chicken John Rinaldi as chief builder." | | It doesn't really interest me, but I guess it does make a lot | more sense than Mars colonies? | perl4ever wrote: | Here is an interesting application for ships hanging around | in international waters: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_on_Waves | | "Women on Waves (WoW) is a Dutch pro-choice nongovernmental | organization (NGO) created in 1999 by Dutch physician Rebecca | Gomperts, in order to bring reproductive health services, | particularly non-surgical abortion services and education, to | women in countries with restrictive abortion laws.[1] Other | services offered by WoW include contraception, individual | reproductive counseling, workshops, and education about | unwanted pregnancy." | louwrentius wrote: | Can we call this floating city Waterworld? | BoxOfRain wrote: | You might be interested in the story of Radio Caroline, back in | the '60s the BBC had a state monopoly on British radio and it | was very stuffy and conservative. To get around this people | used to set up AM transmitters and studios on ships just | outside of UK territorial waters and transmitted from beyond | the jurisdiction of the government. There were quite a few of | these but Radio Caroline was the first and longest-lived - they | lasted up to 1990 when the British government gave itself the | power to raid radio ships in international waters (!) but it | eventually returned with a license and is still around today. | | While it wasn't exactly a dystopian floating city (quite the | opposite, it was dedicated people who _wanted_ to be there) it | 's still really interesting from lots of points of view I | think. | megameter wrote: | I learned of Radio Caroline from the lyrics of Thomas Dolby - | Radio Silence: | | _Carve her legend on the bow, Caroline 452_ | BoxOfRain wrote: | Ironically he'd have been breaking the law in Britain if | the lyrics had the real frequency because promoting | "pirate" radio stations is illegal over here. I think | people used to get in trouble for having Radio Caroline car | stickers but it was a bit before my time. The whole story | of Radio Caroline really reminds me of the current British | government's attitude to the internet today, there's some | incredibly controlling personalities in Whitehall now as | then. It wasn't so much that they were using the radio | spectrum without a licence (apparently it was quite under- | utilised back then anyway), more that they were bringing | media to the masses without the BBC's strict oversight. The | debates at the time around radio sound a lot to me like the | debates around who should control the internet, state | monopolies or various degrees of regulated corporations. | | You can hear them (their licensed incarnation plus the | occasional pirate relaying them) on 648 AM in south east | England but I think they're getting a more powerful | transmitter in the next few months so they should be | audible much further. I was bored in the lockdowns and got | into radio DXing of all things, which is how I fell into | this particular rabbit hole! | alexjplant wrote: | Me too! One of my top-five records of all time. I was able | to grab a pressing that had the original guitar version of | "Radio Silence" - although I can appreciate the version | that eventually ended up on later pressings I enjoy the | guitar one so much more. I also saw him perform live in | Baltimore pre-pandemic. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ntZNpE3am8 | mike503 wrote: | Real life Snow Crash! | germinalphrase wrote: | Perhaps, more like Armada from "The Scar". | myself248 wrote: | Kowloon Hulled City? | srvmshr wrote: | There actually was such a situation during the wars near Suez | Canal - the Great Bitter Lakes Association or the Yellow fleet | [1][2] | | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Fleet | | 2. https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/great-bitter-lake- | ass... | obmelvin wrote: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26657332 | | Most recent discussion of the Great Bitter Lake Association | (googling seems to indicate it'd been posted on HN before - | but the Ever Given's grounding made it relevant again) | hikerclimber1 wrote: | Good. | jaqalopes wrote: | This is upsetting. What can I, an ordinary civilian not involved | with the shipping industry, do to help these people? | regnull wrote: | https://www.missiontoseafarers.org | forgotmypw17 wrote: | Buy less stuff, basically. | | Think hard before buying something "new". You may not need it, | or you may be able to find alternatives, such as hand-me-downs, | secondhand, etc. | m463 wrote: | wouldn't that create a recession or depression? | forgotmypw17 wrote: | Is an economic recession or depression necessarily bad, if | everyone's basic needs are still accounted for? | | If the economy is in a state of overproduction and extreme | waste while the effects are the burn-up of our own habitat, | shouldn't it tune down a bit anyway? | PoachedSausage wrote: | We could go for ecological and climate collapse instead. | | I hope there is a middle way. | plausibledeny wrote: | How does that help the people in the shipping industry? Let's | say you did reduce shipping and therefore there were fewer | shipping jobs, the people currently doing this work would | lose these jobs and have to find other work. Something which | would be even less attractive than shipping. How's that help | them? | forgotmypw17 wrote: | It doesn't help them either way, whether you buy stuff or | not. | | However, it does help you not be comlicit to their | treatment. | plausibledeny wrote: | But clearly for many of them this bad choice is their | best option (unfortunately). So the goal isn't to improve | their lives but to assuage our guilt? | | Companies that use these services could exert pressure | for better conditions, just like some have done with | other companies in their supply chain. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | I think there is a difference between guilt and | complicity, though they are related. | | I have somewhat limited agency in this world, limited to | the little bit of money I spend, the movement of my arms | and legs, the words I speak, the things I look at, and my | thoughts and intentions. | ericd wrote: | Local BuyNothing groups are great for this. | Tijdreiziger wrote: | Just looked into Buy Nothing. What's the advantage of using | this platform vs. second-hand/thrift shops? | ericd wrote: | It's typically just a Facebook group of your neighbors, | so "platform" might be a bit strong for what it is. | Besides everything being free, I've found it helps build | a bit of a sense of community for those who participate. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | I think it's an alternative to second-hand and thrift | shops, and the biggest advantage is that it is available | even in areas without thrift shops. | | The second advantage is that you don't have to pay, so it | is more likely that items will find a good home instead | of being discarded. | | The third advantage is non-participation in the money | system, if you're into that sort of thing, and also the | elimination of overhead for store and inventory upkeep. | | One downside, of course, is that most people aren't | willing to keep their "stock" around for too long, so | there's limited inventory at any given time that you can | browse. | shakezula wrote: | You can't "buy less stuff" when the things we're talking | about are necessities, often times food and critical supplies | like fuel. Container ships don't just ship you game consoles | and televisions. | | And even if you managed to reduce all private consumption to | zero, commercial consumption probably makes up an order of | magnitudes more than private does. It doesn't matter what YOU | do, you can't change the scales that these ships operate. | | The only thing that will fix this is government intervention | and fines that make it less cost effective to abandon the | ship than to deal with the consequences. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | I would hazard an eyeball guess that the overwhelming | majority of container ships headed for the U.S. are | carrying non-essentials. | | I disagree with your statement that "it doesn't matter what | you do". It is all that matters, because what everyone else | does is beyond my control, and only what I do is under my | control. | | Individual action and its spread through word-of-mouth is | pretty much the only way anything changes in this world. | jessaustin wrote: | _You can 't "buy less stuff" when the things we're talking | about are necessities, often times food and critical | supplies like fuel._ | | This isn't really an excuse in e.g. USA, which produces | surpluses in both of these commodities. | trangus_1985 wrote: | But you can "buy less stuff" in general. And that will | reduce your impact. | vkou wrote: | Ask that your federal representative legislate against this | sort of behaviour, and to give teeth to enforcement agencies. | | Unscrupulous actors get away with this because there are few | rules against it, and enforcement is non-existent. If a | shipping company is sanctioned from entry into American ports | based on misbehavior on the other side of the world, they'd | have an incentive to clean up their act... Or at least, to | subcontract everything to shell corporations. | drak0n1c wrote: | Pressure politicians to implement covid rule | exemptions/changes, budget hikes, and personnel bonuses to keep | docks open. They are too often closed to incoming ships due to | unreasonable requirements such as vaccine passports for all | sailors and quarantines whenever there are mild/asymptomatic | breakthrough infections among vaccinated dock staff. | | https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-03-31/for-st... | genericone wrote: | For a start, buy goods and services from ultra-local sources, a | boycott of shipped goods if you will. Know that your sources | get their supplies shipped to them, but just go down the local- | sourcing chain as far as you deem reasonable. | djur wrote: | Local producers are still very likely to be making use of | goods shipped from overseas. You can't boycott your way out | of the global economy. | FredPret wrote: | It'll never be possible. Locally produced food/gadgets were | made using raw materials and equipment that were likely | imported. | | The raw material was extracted and the equipment itself was | produced by yet another layer of equipment. And so on, until | you get to the iron ore and copper and so on. No way will all | of that be local. | FpUser wrote: | >"boycott of shipped goods" | | And all those poor sailors suddenly retire and live happily | ever after, NOT. Buying local is not a solution to sailors | and not a solution to buyers either as so many things are | simply not being made locally. | | What is needed is a control. If company does things like this | then countries can start issuing huge fines should any ship | of said company visit the their ports. That'll teach them | proper. | pbhjpbhj wrote: | Does that help them? It makes the trade that at sports the | abuses less financially viable, but that might make the | abuses worse. If the trade stops they lose their jobs and | money stops flowing from wealthier regions to poorer regions. | | Fair trade is better than no trade (other things being equal) | if you want to support foreign workers. | | Just global trade systems are a hard problem, as I see it, | and really can't be organised from the consumer end (ie by | simply choosing where/if to buy goods). | ericd wrote: | Do you know of any good ways to find these ultra-local | sources of goods efficiently? | egypturnash wrote: | For food, farmer's markets usually work well; if you can't | find one locally whose hours and sellers sync up with your | food needs, look at all your local grocers - there should | be at least one who gets a lot of local goods, and puts | signs on the shelves proclaiming this. | ericd wrote: | Thanks. Any ideas about sourcing manufactured goods | locally? | bluGill wrote: | Go to the "bad side of the tracks" and walk in. All towns | have a bunch of generic machine shops that can | manufacture. Look for welders, machinists, sheet metal | and that type of thing in the name. Then walk into the | office. | | Note that few of them will do the design/engineering work | for you. But if you have a "blueprint" they will build | it. Be prepared to pay - they are all making good wages | for your city not third world step above slave wages. | ericd wrote: | I was thinking more finished goods made locally, rather | than custom-made. I'm guessing the coverage will be | pretty meager, though. But good advice for the next time | I want something a bit more unique, thanks! | mook wrote: | Note that farmers markets don't guarantee that the | produce is actually local. Realistically you'd need to | camp out early enough to catch them shipping it on site | to figure out where it's actually from. | MichaelZuo wrote: | Or you can talk to them, gauge their trustworthiness, and | ask around about their reputation. | asdff wrote: | Usually its obvious that the heirloom produce they are | selling would be impossible to ship long distances. an | heirloom tomato is amazingly fragile compared to a roma | bred for shipping. | chefkoch wrote: | I don't think you'll find tomatoes and salad in these | ships. Most of the poorly run ships will not go to first | world harbors with safety controls etc. | mam2 wrote: | Nothing really relevant probalby. | literallyaduck wrote: | You could contact your lawmakers and ask for a crew bond escrow | requirement for ships, insolvent companies forfeit the money | and it pays to send the crew home with a year's pay. | OldHand2018 wrote: | I don't think any of the suggestions made thus far will do | anything to help out. | | I think that one of the only methods that has a chance is to | go to the UN and work out a treaty on human rights for | maritime workers with the stipulation that once a | supermajority of nations ratify/adopt it, ships flying the | flag of a nation that hasn't ratified it are not allowed in | the ports of the nations that have. | Swenrekcah wrote: | Form a group of a few like minded people and pressure your | representatives to do something. | avaldes wrote: | I'm sorry but is this a template response? This kind of | situation is a bureaucratic mess spanning an awful lot of | jurisdictions. What "your representative" can possibly do to | help abandoned crewmen on a ship in a forgotten port in | whatever place in the world when the ships operator is a | chain of shell companies to the point that's virtually | impossible to pinpoint a single entity to blame. It has to be | a better way. | Swenrekcah wrote: | Sure, it's not an easy way. But basically I can think of | four things to do: | | 1. Complain on the internet. This is easy but utterly | ineffectual. | | 2. Alter your buying behavior. Unless you are the | purchasing director for a multinational conglomerate, also | utterly ineffectual. | | 3. Do something stupid like trying to blow up a | containership. Also ineffectual, will land you in jail and | will almost certainly kill some innocent people. | | 4. Contact your local representatives and get them to do | soemthing about it. This will be easier if you are part of | a larger group. Then your group and your representative(s) | can contact someone higher up and so on. | | Yes this particular problem and many others relating to | ship operations thrives because there is little direct | control and everyone is from 20 different jurisdictions, | but perhaps some of those jurisdictions can team up and tax | those that don't follow their rules or whatever. I am not | an expert in this but some people are and the most I can do | is let my representatives know that I care about this | stuff. Maybe I actually should go and do that. | m463 wrote: | there's also the news media. | | (although I have noticed something unfortunate: I have a | LOT of 5-star documentaries to watch, but rarely do, | while I watch even 2-star scifi stuff almost immediately) | Swenrekcah wrote: | Which also does nothing unless combined with method 4. | themaninthedark wrote: | Something interesting to me is that this article comes a t a time | when shipping is reaching record highs. We used to pay around 4k | for a container from Asia to the US, now the price is 25k. | | It looks like there a a large amount of volatility in the | shipping system as this is not the first time we have seen price | jumps and crashes. I remember hearing about shipping | congestion/issues in SEA a couple years ago as well as periodic | stories about congestion/issues at Longbeach. | | With global trade ever on the rise, we should expect to see it | remain profitable, unless there are too many companies coming in | and trying to undercut each other. | m463 wrote: | I wonder what effect Ever Given had on all of this | bserge wrote: | If these were sail ships, they'd have been commandeered a long | time ago. Sadly, they're all dependent on expensive af fuel. | jefftk wrote: | Sailing ships require large amounts of labor, which is even | more expensive. | bserge wrote: | Yeah, that's not why they're not being used. More to do with | the absolutely massive size that motor powered ships can | have. | MattGaiser wrote: | Yes, but then the labour can just take over the ship if they | aren't paid. | mistrial9 wrote: | I paid money to cross the Pacific Ocean on a Maersk line, 300 | meter cargo ship (us_en here). Many people asked me if I worked | to be on board, and the answer was "no", Maersk did not allow it. | The officers were mostly East Germans who needed a job, while the | strictly segregated, "A-Bs" were almost all Pacific Islanders of | some kind. The conditions were clean and professional, but I got | the feeling soon that this was not a desirable job. The officers | would spend at least 60 days on duty, often more.. without a | vacation day, but had a weekly day "off" or two, except the | Captain who is technically working at all times. | | I enjoyed the travel and had a good voyage, with many small | things to say about it at another time. As I learn about | "business" and the world, I understand more about labor abuses, | even with "respectable" companies. And, your outrage does | nothing, because people who mistreat others professionally are | quite used to the complaining, including yours. I am not at all | surprised at this article. | polishdude20 wrote: | How much did that voyage cost? | p_j_w wrote: | I'm not OP, but I've looked it up before, and it's actually | quite expensive. Ballpark of around $75/night (USD). And, of | course, it's slow, so you'll be using a substantial portion | of your banked vacation time to do it (if that's a concern | for you). | wolverine876 wrote: | > quite expensive. Ballpark of around $75/night (USD) | | For room and board? That's pretty economical. | [deleted] | the-dude wrote: | AFAIK you would need papers to be allowed to work. | atatatat wrote: | From the government of the Pacific Ocean..? | zerkten wrote: | Maersk's insurer, or more likely, legal team wouldn't | permit something like this because of the liability they'd | carry for enabling it. It wouldn't get past that point to a | discussion of region-specific employment restrictions, not | that they matter here per your comment. | throwaway0a5e wrote: | All they (and every other bigco) care about is doing | whatever token "due diligence" they need to do. If your | papers aren't legit they don't care as long as they don't | know. | rhcom2 wrote: | I'd assume from the government of the country which the | vessel is flagged under. For example needing a Merchant | Mariner's Credential if a US ship. | elliekelly wrote: | I think ships are a bit like the wild west... one of the last | "anything goes" jurisdictions. The cruise industry especially | goes to great lengths to avoid regulatory oversight at all | costs. | ddoran wrote: | I enjoyed "The Cargo Ship Diaries" [1] by Niall Doherty about | his time traveling as a paid passenger on merchant ships. | | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21868783-the-cargo-ship-... | rootsudo wrote: | this is also common on cruise ships and naval around the world. | - officers are european, with more lately east european. | | Then the staff or A-B are usually filipino, Vietmanese or | Indonesian. Its more salary then back where they're from - and | it has interesting cultural changes in their socities. | | In the philippines, these are called "OFW" families. daddy is | never home, but because he works "abroad" his family can have | newer stuff, be in a better neighborhood, etc. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_Filipino_Worker | hunterb123 wrote: | this is common amongst all first world industries. | | whether it's farming, cruises, factories, transportation, | etc. | | not supporting it, but that's the current setup. | smabie wrote: | Why wouldn't you support it? Seems like a win-win for most | parties involved. | hunterb123 wrote: | Directly, it usually it leads to poor working conditions | when you have non-residential workers, especially ones in | a quasi-legal status. | | For factories, you sometimes have the problem of the | factory shutting down after the locals become dependent | on it. | | For migrant working, it's hard on the children of the | family and it causes tension between the families not | participating. | | Philosophically, one could argue it's exploitation and is | very close to slavery except the small amount of pay. | Until this type of work is extinct I don't think one can | morally campaign for UBI can you? | | Currently this type of work is apparently necessary so | we've accepted that the system cannot either pay the more | wealthy citizen's wage nor up the wage of the foreign | workers. | | Is there a demand to up the wage of these non-represented | workers that make far below minimum wage? | | Is there a demand to up the wage of minimal wage for | citizens and are the foreign workers mentioned? | | Is there a demand for UBI for citizens to not work at all | while foreign workers pick up the slack? | jokethrowaway wrote: | UBI is income redistribution. It will always be immoral | for those paying to support others who are not working. | | What you describe is not exploitation, people are working | of their own will and that's the best deal they can have. | | When you'll eliminate those jobs with income | redistribution and minimum wage those people (especially | if they're coming in from a different, poorer country) | will just be out of a job. | hunterb123 wrote: | A prostitute can be exploited by a pimp even though it's | her own will to work vs be homeless under a bridge. It's | the "best deal she has". | | It may be the best option for these people, but you are | exploiting their poverty for your profit, otherwise you'd | pay the minimum wage. | | It's the people who cry minimum wage hikes while | exploiting this business that make my blood boil. | | I agree about UBI, it's immoral, period. | UnpossibleJim wrote: | Our government has bailed out banks multiple times, | injected money into the stock market, the airlines, a | constant state of war that has lasted since Bush one that | has cost trillions of dollars... but UBI that can have | its cost reduced by drawing its budget from social | security, disability and welfare, that's the one that | makes your blood boil? | hunterb123 wrote: | Many things can make my blood boil, but this thing was | the topic. ( _cough_ whataboutism _cough_ ) | | But yes people supporting near slave labor while also | wanting UBI does make my blood boil, lazy fucks. | | As does child-trafficking, bank bailouts, defense | contract laundering, nepotism, etc. | | Gotta have ice cold veins to counteract all that blood | boiling bullshit in the world, dontcha. | chmsky00 wrote: | It would be immoral to redistribute the real property | someone worked on. | | I have no issue with income distribution of a social | value store since allowing it to be monopolized to prop | up the value of a minority rich, to let millions starve, | or die of preventable disease is immoral and violent. | | I don't believe Elon Musk is worth billions. I just can't | take his real stuff. | | Letting our social value store be co-opted by a handful | of memes isn't exactly free agency, speech, or market of | ideas. When "get job, buy stuff" is the one true | sentence, why believe ideas like freedom matter? | fumar wrote: | I don't follow your reasoning. How are memes changing or | impacting currency? | dylan604 wrote: | It's not a matter of supporting hiring people of | different nationalities. It's supporting the current | conditions surrounding these employees. If these workers | are not of a legal status, then they are easily abused | (working conditions/below minimum pay/etc). These workers | are more fearful of being deported than the abuse which | means they do not report any of the wrongs that may be | occurring. To me, this says much more about the employer. | dragonwriter wrote: | > this is also common on cruise ships and naval around the | world. - officers are european, with more lately east | european. > Then the staff or A-B are usually filipino, | Vietmanese or Indonesian. | | Merchant marine, sure, but _naval_? Wouldn't both officers | and crew be the nationality of the force in the vast majority | of cases? | [deleted] | unethical_ban wrote: | You can't toss out a cool anecdote like that and not talk more | about how to get on a ship! | wolverine876 wrote: | > your outrage does nothing | | It's a trendy thing to say these days, but history shows that | outrage and public opinion do quite a lot, and that is why | people work very hard to manage it (including, these days, to | try to appear unbothered). There are plenty of labor laws that | the public has passed, and you can see, for example, SV | companies responses to publicized labor abuses in their supply | chains. | PicassoCTs wrote: | History shows that outrage does something, when it turns into | laws. Todays outrage is managed ressource going nowhere. | wolverine876 wrote: | What about the effects of #Metoo, racial injustice | protests, LGTBQ+ marriage, transgender protections (and | discrimination - outrage results in bad laws too), gun | rights outrage, voter ID laws, etc etc etc. | | Lots is happening. | | Also, outrage doesn't need laws to be effective: Plenty of | corporations do things that aren't legally required, in | order to please the public. The NFL didn't have to address | racial injustice, but it did. Bad things happen too - | lynchings, for example. | tehjoker wrote: | Really interesting story! Why did you have to pay in order to | work, it was a big discount? | | Just want to point out that yes, companies dismiss complaints, | but they don't dismiss it when workers stop working together. | Then they get panicked. | tdeck wrote: | I think OP paid to travel as a passenger. They explicitly | didn't get the option to work on the ship for a discount on | their passage. Apparently you can just pay to travel on these | container ship lines, although it can take more than 2 weeks | to cross the ocean and accommodations vary. | rendall wrote: | You need to read more carefully. OP wrote they paid to be on | the ship and did not have to work. | CalChris wrote: | A-B, usually AB, is an _able body seaman_. This is the lowest | level of certification for the deck department of a merchant | ship. | | https://www.mitags.org/course/able-seaman-course/ | [deleted] | throwaway1777 wrote: | Just curious but why specify East Germans versus Germans. Is | the Berlin Wall back up? | heurisko wrote: | I assumed they were talking about an event pre-1989. | Melting_Harps wrote: | > I assumed they were talking about an event pre-1989. | | Same at first, but then having spent time in the South | years ago I also realized the prejudice from the North on | the South for economic reasons. | | The South is typically seen as the most affluent of all of | Germany and depending on the Stat the most influenced by | politics: as in the case with Baden-Wuttenburg and the | Green Party. Hell, people from the Schwabish part | (Stutgart) are used looked down on by the rest of Baden- | Wuttenburg for being typically very stingy and aloof (even | by German standards) and seen as not worth building ties | with. I had a bad experience with them, after being warmly | welcomed in Germany, but I took that more a random | situation rather than anything worth looking deeper into. | | It's frankly a very odd situation and makes you wonder why | they're even united at all, I spent time in the North near | Cologne this summer and to be honest the amount of Turkish | people was a very welcomed sight especially how well | integrated they were in Society. | | I wish I could have remained with that feeling because | stuff like this makes me realize how deeply scarred the | German psyche is in regards to this topic. | culebron21 wrote: | Every time I meet East Germans, the discussion will | inevitably touch the unification and the social tension. | | What I heard were complaints on | | * privatization by the West and sometimes closure of | enterprises. People of age 40 and older remember well the | tough years after unification when their parents had no job | and had to take a lower-level one. | | * they claim that management of states and enterprises was | taken over by the Wessies | | * a lot of complaints about amerikanization of the culture | and aligning with the US in every international policy | question under Merkel. I regret I did not ask further about | the culture, but just an example: by default radio stations | in Germany put American music, more than stations in other | Western European countries that I heard. It's very hard to | stumble upon songs in German, just as any other language but | English. (If you listen to French stations, foreign non- | English music is much more probable to hear.) | | * East Germans are more atomized and secular. That's similar | to other East European contries. | | * Women were forced to emansipate in the East, because they | needed to work, whereas in the West they could afford being | housewifes. And a surprising consequence, in the West a man | can't be friends with a married woman -- Ossies living in the | West complained of that too. | | That's what I've heard from them and some my own superficial | impressions from radio. I can't confirm that, but sure it's | more or less founded info. | iSnow wrote: | >in the West a man can't be friends with a married woman | | Nah, that's no longer true as of today. It used to be like | that in the 60+ generation, but among younger people, it | really depends on the partners involved. | goodells wrote: | Even decades after reunification, the socioeconomic | differences between areas that used to be East and West | Germany are still very apparent. | killerpopiller wrote: | for example? | fxtentacle wrote: | On the way between Hamburg and Berlin, there's an area | that looks like a deserted warzone. It's where all the | young people came from that moved to big cities for the | better job opportunities. The people that remain are | elderly / unemployed, so naturally those villages will | decay. The east had quite some areas that relied on local | industry and/or farming for people's income. During the | unification, most industry was auctioned off to | westerners, so the east took a pretty big hit, both in | terms of losing company tax revenue and in terms of | losing high-skilled labor. | AtlasBarfed wrote: | This is the precise problem that rural America has with | youth abandoning the rural areas. | | The cure for this is immigration, but the people that | remain in the rural areas are very right wing and very | xenophobic. | downrightmike wrote: | There are a lot of areas in the east that are abandoned | and falling into decay. | malandrew wrote: | https://vividmaps.com/germany-is-still-divided-by-east- | and-w... | SonicScrub wrote: | Here's a good image detailing the wage differences | between East-West. Similar charts can be found for GDP, | quality of life, and other assorted economic measures. As | well as many cultural differentiators like religion. The | wall fell decades ago, but the impacts remain, therefore | sometimes it makes sense to distinguish between the two. | | https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fvoxeu. | org... | bagels wrote: | https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/06/east- | german... | dnissley wrote: | Found this analysis of the wealth gap between east and | west germans: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/121 | 292/1/837461987.p... | | TL;DR: at the 50th percentile, net worth of west germans | was ~40k in 2012 vs ~14k for east germans (in euros). | kesselvon wrote: | East Germans are a lot poorer, the East German economy is | a lot lower productivity and investment, and politically | the old DDR states lean a bit more right (ripe area for | AfD recruitment). | | Some West germans still look down on Ossies, even though | Merkel was one herself. It's a lot like how northern | states look down on southern states in the U.S. | bserge wrote: | Well, I've got a surprise for you | inglor_cz wrote: | Ignoring Merkel and the former President Gauck, the | percentage of Ossis in prestigious, affluent or | influential positions is very subpar. Enterpreneurs, | CEOs, well-known artists, professors, generals, judges | ... are disproportionally Wessis, and immigrated Wessis | dominate in those positions even in former GDR. | | IIRC the discrepancy between population share and elite | share for Ossis is even worse than for American blacks. | quickthrowman wrote: | Look at a night time aerial photo of Berlin, you can | still see where the wall was (via the color temp of the | lights). Reintegration takes a while. | iSnow wrote: | That special photo is really old by now. Today, you have | to know where the wall was to know. Berlin has switched | to LED-lighting for all new street lights. | micromacrofoot wrote: | I see the effects of redlining in the US carry on for | decades after physical barriers like highways have been | removed, so I absolutely believe it. | burmer wrote: | Yeah, that's why so many ships are registered to specific | countries too, so they can operate with looser restrictions. | It's basically "offshoring" but for the regulations. When I | worked in fisheries, I remember seeing so many boats registered | to Panama, and never knew why: | http://www.pmacertification.com/advantages-of-registering-a-... | joe_the_user wrote: | _And, your outrage does nothing, because people who mistreat | others professionally are quite used to the complaining, | including yours. I am not at all surprised at this article._ | | I enjoyed your post until this sentence. The article describes | a situation gradually deteriorating into a crisis. The barrier | between people complaining and things actually happening are | indeed high but I still believe taking note of a crisis is a | first step to acting. | indigochill wrote: | > taking note of a crisis is a first step to acting. | | Yes, in the same way overcoming denial is the first step in | personal recovery. The trouble is, like a depressed alcoholic | who doesn't care that drink's ruining their life, it's not | that those running the company are in denial about the way | they're abusing their employees. It's that they know it and | don't care. | | What's the path from here to them caring, though? One thing | that might help is if their clients stopped doing business | with them, but do their clients care? | lotsofpulp wrote: | The shipping company's clients will stop doing business | with them if the shipping company cared, by switching to | their competitors who do not care and will sell to them at | lower prices. | | The only solutions are political, with some combination of | giving those people being subject to abuse better options | so that the abusers are not able to abuse, and by making | said abuses illegal. | pasquinelli wrote: | i particularly liked that part, because too often it seems | people conflate posting for meaningful action, to the point | that posting is a hinderence to meaningful action. | amelius wrote: | > I enjoyed your post until this sentence. | | Why? The problem with complaining (such as in an echo chamber | like HN often is too) is that it is a way to vent | frustration, taking the pressure of an issue. So in a way | complaining actually helps the ones you are complaining | about. | chmsky00 wrote: | A whole lot of people take the "I lived through a real | crisis..." then detail their life during the gas shortage or | something. | | Unfortunately most do not see anything as a crisis until a | literal one of sufficient scale is upon us. | duckfruit wrote: | This sounds fascinating. I'm interested to learn more. How does | one go about paying for passage on a cargo ship? | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | I couldn't tell you search terms, but ISTR that there a HN | user who has a site that finds ships with available berthing | and prices. | rudian wrote: | Last time I googled this I found it was quite expensive, | basically cruise-level per-night prices, at least in my area. | Perhaps if you contact the shipping companies directly you | can arrange something cheaper. | dougmwne wrote: | I have read that too. It seems bizarre that it would be | expensive, but there may be a supply an demand issue for | the number of people who cannot or will take flight vs. the | very limited number of transatlantic and transpacific ship | crossings. | fiftyacorn wrote: | There are probably tax reasons for offering it and they | would prefer not too many people to take them up on it | ksdale wrote: | I assume it used to be far more informal and sort of a | handshake deal you'd make with the captain, and then the | companies formalized it but it was still cheap because no | one knew/wanted to do it, but then as the possibility | becomes common knowledge, there are way more people who | want to do it than there are spots for, so they raise the | price. | Ekaros wrote: | It is not their core-business like cruises or ferry | companies. So there is probably very substantial overhead | in coordination, billing and so on. Same goes for | anything from any company, technically they can provide | service and even might do, but price it is sensible due | to extra work is high. | dylan604 wrote: | I could see them considering a risk factor into that | pricing. What "normal" person would look to travel this | way? Someone with something to hide perhaps? Someone hoping | to skirt some of the more rigorous screening of other | travel options, specifically regarding their "luggage"? | AlbertCory wrote: | I've never done this, but if you read stories by people | who have, they appreciate not having 3,000 other tourists | on the boat; just a few dozen or so, plus the crew | members who don't talk to you. | mistrial9 wrote: | OP here - there were zero other passengers, and it was | exactly the way you say.. the crew did not talk to me.. | It was great! many long hours of ocean, days, nights, out | in the far blue.. with no computers at all. When I | arrived in Japan I was so rested! the passage into Tokyo | Bay was so memorable! it takes time.. it was an antidote | and clarity.. | JoeAltmaier wrote: | The ocean is a different place in so many ways. | | My cousin is a Merchant Marine Engineer. Some big ships can't | leave port without one, yet they are in short supply. So he's | paid a lot per voyage. Two or three multi-week voyages and he'd | done working for the year. | | Early on in his career, an officer would request his passport. To | make things go faster in port, all the passports could be | presented at once for quicker clearing of customs etc. | | Of course he learned immediately, this meant he could not leave | the ship in foreign port. And the officer sandbagged when he | requested his passport back. The result was, he was essentially | held captive for several months aboard ship, several times longer | than he was contracted for. And the ship could count on having an | Engineer for every leg of the journey. | | Now he knows better, keeps his passport on his person at all | times. | chefkoch wrote: | Huh? | | I assume he is a westener, so just tell customs your held | against your will and the guy with passports goes to jail. | codazoda wrote: | I was just reading about Cuba the other day. It seems that only | the captain can leave the ship there until all passengers are | cleared. I presume he needs to take their passports with him. | That creates a bit of a catch-22 here. | downrightmike wrote: | Seems like you should order a second passport once you have | the first. Give the Capt the first one that is now invalid, | but since he can't scan it, how will he know? | nicoburns wrote: | In the UK you can actually legitimately get two passports | if you can show you need it for work (I think it's | typically for travelling to countries who don't like each | other and won't let you in if you have stamps from the | other one). I wonder if this would count. | sytelus wrote: | I still don't understand why passports are required in official | paper. It's just a bar code that guy scans to retrieve the | official record with photo ID on their server. Anything printed | on paper passport is worthless and untrustworthy. | woodruffw wrote: | > It's just a bar code that guy scans to retrieve the | official record with photo ID on their server. | | This would require a fully connected graph between all | Departments of State around the world (i.e., the holders of | their respective countries' passport DBs), and that is | _definitely_ not the case. It will also never be the case, | since there are various geopolitical advantages to having a | secret passport database (like being able to mint identities | for spies, or deny the existence of a person). | | The bar code you're referring to is just a machine-readable | version of the information printed on the paper. It doesn't | carry any proof of authenticity. | dylan604 wrote: | A nosy customs official can flip through the other stamps in | the passport to see if you've been some place that makes you | suspect. Also, certain countries will tag your passport which | marks you for automatic extra inspections without even | looking at your photo/name info. This happened to me | specifically in Australia. | Aachen wrote: | If only that was how it worked. Even within the country of | origin they don't always have access to such a system easily, | let alone between countries. | themaninthedark wrote: | That's surprising that is still happening nowadays. | | My brother is a Merchant Mariner. I think he is officer first | class now but he worked his way up from AB. | | He just left out, he is probably going to be on the ship 8 | months, maybe more depending. It used to be 3 months on 3 off. | | The contract he had gotten back from was supposed to be that | but because of the world right now ended up being 6 months. I | think he was only back for 3 before they called him back. | | He was the health and safety officer on his last outing, said | that people were going crazy. Kept imagining they were getting | Covid when they had been to sea after a month, said that there | was a suicide on another vessel by someone who thought he was | sick.(either was worried everyone was going to hate him for | spreading the disease or afraid he would spread it to others.) | | Hope your cousin is staying safe out there. Don't know your | nationality but the hopefully he can warn others quietly about | that, the US is supposed to have a guild/union but I hear they | aren't always the best. | andy_ppp wrote: | When I worked with a container shipping company there was a | mechanic trapped on a ship for months past his shore date but | there was no one to cover him. He looked at me, the computer guy | from the office, carrying a large wrench, like he wanted to kill | me just to get off the ship. | mesh wrote: | If interested in reading more on this, and other abuses on the | sea: | | The Outlaw Ocean https://www.amazon.com/Outlaw-Ocean-Journeys- | Untamed-Frontie... | | This is based on a series of articles the author wrote for the | New York Times: | https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/07/24/world/the-out... | at-fates-hands wrote: | This was a shocking and eye opening series for me. Complete | lawlessness, murder and mayhem; which is rampant in certain | areas of the world. | | I had been under the impression that international waters were | much more regulated. Man oh man, was I wrong. | Thlom wrote: | Ports are very regulated. International waters not so much. | hansthehorse wrote: | Which is why you have to very careful if you gamble on a | cruise ship. They answer to no gaming commission, nobody | inspects their gaming machines and you are basically | trusting the company to run fair games. | mcculley wrote: | I have enjoyed playing blackjack in Las Vegas. I once | went on a cruise ship out of Port Canaveral. I caught the | dealer cheating twice by miscounting. I haven't played on | a cruise ship since then. | bluGill wrote: | True, though in general they try to be a bit honest. They | still need to maintain reputation and repeat business is | a big part of their clients. | | That doesn't mean the slots will be more than 80% payout, | but there will be a payout to someone. | myself248 wrote: | Every time I've heard the phrase "international waters", it | is specifically in reference to the lack of regulation. | bena wrote: | There's a slightly older book on the same topic | | The Outlaw Sea: https://www.amazon.com/Outlaw-Sea-World- | Freedom-Chaos/dp/086... | | It's a pretty good look into the world of international sea | travel as well. It even gets into the ship-breaking industry as | well. | mbil wrote: | I'll add that there was a 99% Invisible episode on this topic: | https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/abandoned-ships/ | randlet wrote: | Seconded. I listened to the audio book. Eye opening to say the | least. | phkahler wrote: | How about the crew sells the ship for scrap. Had they left after | their pay stopped the ship would be abandoned. Not sure how | salvage works, but isnt there an element of "finders keepers"? If | you dont work for the company as evidenced by them not paying you | for X months, aren't you the finder of a big floating pule of | scrap? | | I'm sure there's a flaw in my logic... | trhway wrote: | at some point they will raise the Jolly Rodger. | | >Without Pay, Food or a Way Home | | the civilized version would be to go the local authorities and | initiate abandoned property/lien proceedings against the ship and | the cargo for some port fees/fines for some violations by the | ship (which is easy to commit if you're in control of the ship) | or do a bit of freight Uber - after all you have a ship :). | R0b0t1 wrote: | Usually they are scared of retaliation in their home countries. | If they weren't going to ultimately be returned to their port | of origin I'm sure more would just abandon the ships at first | sign of trouble. | | It'd be better if they did, really, as then it would cause | authorities in the port countries to pierce the veil and shake | down the owners. | trhway wrote: | Never heard that being an issue. As long as the crew is | sticking together. Back in 199x my father worked on a fish | trawling fleet which consisted of a former USSR ships | "privatized" by a "New Russian" businessman. The fleet at | various times - depending on success/failure of negotiations | with whatever warlord would happen to control given territory | on a given morning - was based at various places in | Mozambique and Somali. The fleet owner having no laws over | him and being otherwise very shrewd and unscrupulous and | being perfectly able to reach say our family in Russia | (though that would really be against his interests) had never | even delayed payments to the crew as that would mean angering | 20-30 able bodied men who are in control of one of his ships | in a place with practically no laws (and with the crews of | the other ships definitely not in support of the owner on | that issue). | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | They need to scuttle their ships. | rob74 wrote: | Might be an alternative if you're off the coast of, say, | Romania. I wouldn't recommend it off the coast of Somalia | though... | dk1138 wrote: | I agree...it would send a message to beach these ships in high- | visibility areas ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-10-08 23:01 UTC)