[HN Gopher] My Emotions as a CEO ___________________________________________________________________ My Emotions as a CEO Author : mooreds Score : 86 points Date : 2021-10-09 12:16 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (ryancaldbeck.co) (TXT) w3m dump (ryancaldbeck.co) | twelfthnight wrote: | These (mostly negative) emotional reactions seem pretty | reasonable for anyone with so much power/responsibility. I'm not | the first to wonder this, but are there ways to successfully run | a business without a single CEO taking on all the | power/responsibility themself? | jacquesm wrote: | I've invested twice in Co-CEO managed start-ups. Like | everything else, it has its pros and its cons, the one was | decidedly more smooth than the other, but in both cases a | viable business emerged and both companies are still in | business (I've exited the one, am still involved in the other, | which has one member from HN in the management). | cloche wrote: | I've worked for a couple single founder businesses (not with OP | though). I'll never do it again. I think it's much healthier | when they have someone on equal footing that can tell them when | they're being unreasonable and going in the wrong direction. As | a single founder with all the control, it's too easy to just | dismiss concerns that employees raise. I guess that's where the | arrogance comes from. Absolute power corrupts and all that... | dirtypersian wrote: | Yep, this is exactly why I left my last startup. | | Relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder%27s_syndrome# | :~:text=F.... | DizzyDoo wrote: | Worker co-operation (coops) models [0] exist and can take the | form of a dozen employees, or scale to really quite enormous | companies like Mondragon[1]. | | I've come across lots of them in Europe, and a few where I live | now in Canada, but I don't know if they're common at all in the | US? | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_cooperative | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation | zja wrote: | America is generally pretty allergic to socialist ideas. The | tech sector in particular seems to gravitate towards | libertarian ideologies, idolizing founders as heroes who | single handedly disrupt entire industries and are rewarded | with massive wealth. | | I'd be really interested to see more product based startups | follow the coop model, most of the tech coops i've heard of | are dev shops. I imagine not being able to take VC money is a | big challenge, and a reason we don't see more tech coops. | jimkleiber wrote: | > America is generally pretty allergic to socialist ideas. | | I think yes, we often feel allergic to government ownership | of things (at least that's how I see socialism, which may | not be how others see it), yet I don't think that's why | many of us don't like coops, as publicly traded companies | are owned by many people through the stock markets. | | I think what may hinder the rise of coops in the US is | ironically our allergy to democracy in business. We seem to | love democracy in governance yet prefer top-down | authoritarianism in business (and mostly in the military, | minus the civilian leaders). Most coops I know strongly | emphasize democratic governance, where all shareholders are | equal in voting power, and most businesses I know are very | far from that. | | I think the desire for and familiarity with top-down | governance (which seems like authoritarianism to me) that | we get in the business world is influencing many of our | attitudes towards on democracy in governance, as top-down | can be quicker, more adaptive, more efficient, etc | | However, I wonder if the perception of being exploited by | some of these large companies, especially in the consumer | tech sector, will lead to a demand for more | democratic/representative governance, as we see with some | DAOs and more. | | I personally would love to see more coop Clubhouses, | Facebook, TikToks, etc. Let the users 1) have more decision | making power on the platform and 2) receive more profits | from the services. | zja wrote: | Very well said! You might find this talk interesting, | it's about "democracy at work" as a new-ish flavor of | socialism. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ynbgMKclWWc | Zababa wrote: | > yet I don't think that's why many of us don't like | coops, as publicly traded companies are owned by many | people through the stock markets. | | That's not the same thing. The concept of coops is that | the people that work in them own them. | johnebgd wrote: | Why couldn't you take VC money? The VC would just have more | shareholders to contend with. | brianwawok wrote: | VCs talk to 200 people a month with a single CEO or maybe | the odd co-CEO. Along you come with a 20 person co-op | leadership structure. Why would they take that dive? They | want you to look/act/speak/organize like their previous | successes. (Which is the same general reason why non- | white males start at such a giant disadvantage ) | zja wrote: | The defining feature of a worker coop is that it's owned | by the workers. That means they can't give shares to | VC's. I'm sure there's hybrid models where the company is | only majority owned by workers, but I don't know how | common they are and I doubt they're very attractive to | VC's for reasons others have mentioned. | jimkleiber wrote: | I think one reason it's harder is because typically VCs | pay more money to have more decision making power and | many coops are founded on the one member one vote | principle. So despite how much money they'd contribute, | they'd have no more say than the average member. | DizzyDoo wrote: | My understanding of co-ops, while I haven't experienced | them first-hand, is that they are still capitalist in | nature - they are usually profit driven (though not at the | expense of workers), pay is not equal, and the difference | is a democratic decision making structure. | culi wrote: | I'm not sure how much it applies to tech as an industry, but | research shows that coops (or, "labor-managed firms") tend to | last much longer and be more productive than non-coop | companies as well. | | https://www.uk.coop/resources/what-do-we-really-know- | about-w... | DizzyDoo wrote: | Thanks for the link, what an interesting pdf. | | What I still don't quite understand about coops is how they | practically come about? The pdf you linked to says that 84% | come into being from scratch. If you need to buy some | mechanical equipment and rent a factory, does everyone who | joins the coop at the beginning pay into those start-up | costs? Or is the investment in the coop usually entirely | from the outside like bank loans? Is there ever a | distinction between coop members who have invested money | into the firm, and those who join later that haven't? | conradev wrote: | Worker co-ops don't eliminate executive roles, though. They | just make it so that executives serve at the pleasure of the | members (and are usually elected in some form). Mondragon has | a President, who was formerly a Vice President and Managing | Director. REI, a US-based co-op, has a more complicated | story: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recreational_Equipment,_ | Inc.#G... | | They still have hierarchy and pay still scales with position | in that hierarchy. The ratio of CEO pay to worker pay is | generally more equitable, but it is still a ratio. I have no | idea what the work-life balance is like, but running a co-op | (or a nonprofit, for that matter) still sounds like a | stressful job to me. | zemvpferreira wrote: | I'm sorry this person has had such a negative experience of the | job. I can relate to some of it, but as a former CEO (up to a | team of 20-30) I've not felt lonely or jealous. Does he really | think a desire to leave is unique to the c-suite? Apallingly out | of touch. | | In my experience you get what you sign up to take. As CEO of a | company that's taken tens of millions in funding you a) are | indepently wealthy b) have other options for fulfilling work c) | can apply a massive amount of control to your everyday | circumstances. Don't feel like reading 500 emails a day? Delegate | more effectively. Feel lonely? Should have made some fucking true | friends in your life. Feel an unbearable desire to quit? Figure | it out or, you know, quit. I did. | | Founder-CEO is a great privilege of a job and this self-pity | party is unbecoming of a leader. You don't have to be happy all | the time but you do have to face the fact you've chosen this life | again and again over many options most people will never have the | privilege of having. It's not a life sentence. | nojito wrote: | >as a former CEO (up to a team of 20-30) I've not felt lonely | or jealous | | CircleUp is probably 3x as big and C-Level work/responsibility | grows exponentially as headcount increases. | zemvpferreira wrote: | That seems unlikely, no? How would Jack Welch ever have been | about to cope with 10^19 the work as this dude (or me)? | | At a certain point it all just ... tops out certainly or we'd | have no Presidents. Certainly whoever is the CEO at circleup | has had more responsibility than I have ever had, but | exponentially more? | | I think it's much more likely different people feel stress in | different ways, and that what we bring to the job influences | our experience. | | Not to paint myself as a stoic in any sense, I can remember | spells of not being able to sleep for 3 nights in a row out | of terror and axiety. But when that happens you must find | mechanisms to keep it from happening again. The pain is | transient, not intrinsic. | [deleted] | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | Did we read the same article? I didn't interpret it as a pity- | party at all. I haven't been a CEO, but I have been in upper | management, and that has been stressful enough for me to know | that being a CEO is the last thing I could do. | | I just thought this post was an honest discussion of one | person's emotions, and I didn't feel that it was too strong one | way on the positives or the negatives. If anything I found it | helpful putting into context some of my own emotions that I | have in leadership positions. | zemvpferreira wrote: | Maybe my reading was too coloured by my own emotions and | experiences with the job, and I apologize if so, but | continuing my rant I have a real problem with anyone who | takes very optional and voluntary hardships on and complains | they're hard. Especially when the problems he openly talks | about are so in his control. Email, really? Tell me about the | times your own board tried to oust you or the funerals you | missed for a biz dev meeting that went nowhere and maybe I'll | take you seriosly. | | It makes me uneccessarily mad to read about sacrifice in | privilege. CEOs sometimes want to quit the job? How about | grunts on deployment? My paternal grandfather was a military | man - wartime general. Never heard him complain but did hear | a proud story of when he was a platoon commander in the | jungle. If his platoon happened on a mine field he'd stand | besides the poor sod tasked with defusing it until the job | was done. That's leading. That's grit. | | Let's have conversations about mental health and sacrifices, | but let's not pretend san francisco tech entrepreneurs | leading large successful companies are in a uniquely hard | place in life. | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | If you're leading a company of young, mainly unattached | folks and don't have other companies depending on your | product, then yes, it's more like a gold rush where you all | prosper together and the downside of flying the company | into a mountain is 'oh, well, we tried and we learned, | let's move on to the next thing.' | | It's a different matter if your company is staffed by | family breadwinners and you have customers that would have | serious deletierious consequences if your firm failed. You | don't even need to fail, just go through a rough patch and | lay off some the workers you hired and trained, or, fail to | deliver a project that negatively affects a customer. These | are nerve-wracking for CEOs that aren't made of the stuff | that can lead firmly through these situations. | | Perhaps the better notion is that startup CEOs that really | do react poorly to the 'hard stuff' need a plan to move the | burdensome work to a 'professional CEO' and step into | Chairman/CTO, or somesuch. Keep the fun, keep the equity, | offload the hard stuff. | n4r9 wrote: | The article didn't come across as a complaint to me, rather | a description of the emotions they experienced while in | that role. | zemvpferreira wrote: | I guess what triggers me is the stressors they describe | as responsible for those emotions. To me they are | meaningless compared to things that really should cause | anxiety in a CEO: am I making payroll this month if deal | X falls through? Can I land in jail if thing Y turns out | to be illegal instead of a harmless hustle? If I fizzle | is my professional life over? | | The Hard Thing About Hard Things made the same points as | the author in much more poignant ways to me, when I read | it. No current or future CEO should stress about volume | of email or thoughts of another career as a bartender in | a tropical island - stress about real problems instead. | cj wrote: | > as a former CEO (up to a team of 20-30) I've not felt lonely | or jealous | | Re: loneliness, you must have had a tremendous support network | of other executives. I find the job rather lonely not because | I'm not around people but because the people I'm around don't | understand half the words coming out of my mouth when talking | about the top 3 work related challenges I'm having at any given | time. | | > Feel lonely? Should have made some fucking true friends in | your life. | | That's just unnecessarily cruel. | zemvpferreira wrote: | Re loneliness I knew zero other executives or business people | when I started. I had a great support network of close | friends and family, but no one I could confide in. What I | think helped me cope (when I could cope) was keeping front | and center how privileged I was to have chosen this mountain | to climb. I've since met people starting startups literally | in the middle of warzones. Can't complain I've had it too | rough. Neither has Ryan from the stories which is the point | of the cruelty. | | If he has had it rougher than it seems, let's hear those | stories! Would make for much better blogging than this. | cj wrote: | I fail to see how the legitimacy of someone's suffering or | emotions is affected by their societal privilege. | zemvpferreira wrote: | Well not the suffering, you're certainly right there. But | the internal narrative around that suffering can be | challenged, and in being challenged lessen the suffering. | In my experience. Doubly so in public. | [deleted] | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | I always appreciate it when folks write about their humanity, in | this venue. | | Of course, everyone will have their opinion, as to the "validity" | or whatever, of what people share here, and I can't always say | that I'm thrilled with what these folks write, when they share | their humanity, but I'm still glad they do it. | | Despite all the technology, infrastructure, money, and culture, | the basic work unit in technology is always a _human_ , and | humans are complex, emotional creatures. Our relationships with | each other, and the teams we build, are what make great product | and endeavors. | | I have nothing to share about, regarding this chap's journey. We | have had different paths in our lives, and I don't really relate | too much to this article. I have liked other articles that he's | written. | aerosmile wrote: | I've followed Ryan's writing over the years, especially since our | careers were on a parallel path throughout most of his time as | CEO. I've led a company that had a difficult time in achieving a | PFM and as such everything else was painful. And I was also | blessed to have a perfect PFM in another company. I think I've | seen enough of the spectrum to be able to say that Ryan's writing | is not reflective of the job itself, but more of his perception | of it, which I am not even going to try to analyze. This is not | meant as an attack at Ryan, but more as a data point for anyone | else who is considering becoming a CEO and is feeling discouraged | from reading too much of Ryan's stuff. | | The job has its downsides, and the worst thing that can happen to | you is 1) be a first-time CEO, 2) have no PFM, and 3) have no | safety net. If you hit that trifecta, it's not going to be easy. | But here's the deal - you'll get through it, and you'll come out | on the other side with a much improved mental model that will | allow you to be more successful in your next go around. You may | or may not ever achieve market-level compensation, and you may | even end up in debt. But it will get easier each time you try, it | will come the closest to being your own boss, you will learn more | than doing anything else, and most importantly, you won't turn 70 | and think of yourself as having not taking enough chances in your | life. | notreallyhere00 wrote: | Having had that 1-2-3 combination, they were some of the most | difficult years of my life. | | But the lessons I learned were invaluable and could not have | been learned any other way. | | And - the next thing I started achieved Product Market Fit | right out the gate. | aerosmile wrote: | Edit: sorry for the confusion, "PFM" was meant to say PMF | (autocorrected and I didn't notice) - product market fit. | maCDzP wrote: | What does PFM stand for? | wombatmobile wrote: | I right-clicked and Looked It Up | | Premiata Forneria Marconi is an Italian progressive rock band | founded in 1970 and which continues to the present day. They | were the first Italian group to have success internationally. | The group recorded five albums with English lyrics between | 1973 and 1977. During this period they entered both the | British and American charts. | geoduck14 wrote: | I come to HN for the sarcasm | culi wrote: | Product Farket Mit | tarr11 wrote: | I think he means "Product Market Fit"? | beberlei wrote: | product market fit (PMF), the PFM abbreviation are typos i | believe. | williamstein wrote: | It seems like a permutation or typo or autocorrect for | "product market fit"? | [deleted] | dougSF70 wrote: | Worth reading about what personal and professional challenges | Ryan Caldbeck faced before leaping in to criticize. He wrote an | excellent tear down of a destructive board member appointed by | the VC backer. | eigengrau5150 wrote: | Only the weak are lonely. Only the weak seek power over others. | No wonder CEOs are lonely. This guy needs to man up and accept | that his feelings don't matter to anybody but him. | ajb wrote: | Parent has the following in his profile: "I'm gonna keep | shitposting until the mods ban me or until HN provides account | deletion. " | eigengrau5150 wrote: | My real name is Andre Linoge. Give me what I want and I'll go | away. | wombatmobile wrote: | The article would be different, or at least I would read it | differently, if it had been titled | | My Emotions | | instead of | | My Emotions as a CEO | | But clearly, the author intends this to be informative about the | experience of being CEO. | | So what is a CEO? | | Is it a guy who earns $12 million a year + options at the top of | a NASDAQ corporation with 15,000 staff? | | Or is it a smart guy hired by a founder (or the founder) of an | underfunded venture with no staff and a long path towards making | a vulnerable, contested niche pay? | | Those are different things, presumably with different emotional | challenges. | | What does it tell us that the author chose an ambiguous title, | which isn't explicitly clarified in or by the article? | DoreenMichele wrote: | A sense of inadequacy, jealousy, arrogance and adrenaline are | likely interrelated. | | You don't feel jealous because someone else has something. You | feel jealous because of what you lack. | | Arrogance is often a cover up for self esteem issues. Adrenaline | suggests a fear that you won't be able to rise to the occasion. | | Not everyone will experience that to that degree when in charge. | Though we do have the saying "It's lonely at the top" so I fully | believe that part is very much the norm. | Zababa wrote: | > Though we do have the saying "It's lonely at the top" | | I wonder, is it because it's more lonely at the "top" than at | the "bottom", or because people expect the "top" to be less | lonely than the "bottom"? | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-10-10 23:00 UTC)