[HN Gopher] 3D Printing Sex Toys
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       3D Printing Sex Toys
        
       Author : app4soft
       Score  : 132 points
       Date   : 2021-10-10 16:58 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.billieruben.info)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.billieruben.info)
        
       | ahefner wrote:
       | I'm not judging, but that is an amusingly non-human looking
       | phallus that she has crafted.
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | I already have a great human dick I get to play with.
         | 
         | A dildo would be a poor substitute for him.
        
       | Causality1 wrote:
       | I have questions. If you're doing it all yourself why do you need
       | to go to a silicone shop and "talk to the experts about your
       | needs"? Why tell a beginner to use 3D Builder or Meshmixer when
       | you could do it in ninety seconds in Tinkercad? Why would you
       | slice it in Chitubox to get the volume when your original
       | modeling program or regular slicer would give you that info? On
       | what printer is 0.25mm a step-integer layer height? Finally, is
       | this really any better than printing your dildo and using a $35
       | clone-a-willy kit?
        
         | the-dude wrote:
         | From the Guidelines :
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
         | 
         |  _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other
         | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. _
        
           | Causality1 wrote:
           | That's not a shallow dismissal. I don't understand some of
           | these choices and I want to know why they were made. I want
           | to know why I'm wrong.
        
             | the-dude wrote:
             | Allmost all your 'questions' are closed questions and
             | include your assumed preference. They are not really
             | questions. The tone is belittleing ( is that a word? )
        
               | h2odragon wrote:
               | I disagree with all your assessments. I think specific,
               | discuss-able questions like this lead to educational
               | answers. Asking questions about something isn't
               | disrespectful.
        
               | BillieRuben wrote:
               | the way they are asked can be though, as evidenced above.
        
             | BillieRuben wrote:
             | I think the trouble was your tone, it's important to
             | remember that another real life human made this article.
        
           | Nicksil wrote:
           | That isn't a shallow dismissal.
        
           | BillieRuben wrote:
           | hey thank you for saying this, I also though the tone was
           | pretty off.
        
         | vorpalhex wrote:
         | 1. Not all silicones are equal
         | 
         | 2. Different 3d modeling programs are better at different
         | things. Meshmixer is really good at some organic shape
         | manipulations. Tinkercad is very limiting.
         | 
         | 3. Not all slicing programs will give you the volume
         | 
         | 4. Just because it isn't a default in your printers config
         | doesn't mean it won't work.
         | 
         | 5. Clone a willy kits have limitations, may not suit your needs
         | or be available, or you may want more control of the process.
        
           | app4soft wrote:
           | > _Meshmixer is really good at some organic shape
           | manipulations._
           | 
           | FTR, _Blender_ and _MoI3D_ is also good choice for organic
           | (NURBS /B-spline) surface modeling.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | You go to the shop and ask so you get the right product because
         | silicones that are safe for this are rare and rarely advertised
         | as such.
         | 
         | Because 3D builder is legit better than tinkercad in many ways,
         | but you're free to use tinkercad, it's totally a matter of
         | preference. I actually list it as an option in the article, so
         | not sure what prompted this comment.
         | 
         | Tinkercad won't give you volume info and nor will most organic
         | sculpting software.
         | 
         | Are you talking about "magic numbers" with regard to the layer
         | height? If so, I'm printing on a delta so it basically doesn't
         | matter.
         | 
         | Yes, because it removes the layer lines, which is the main
         | health risk in printed toys (and without smoothing those layer
         | lines just get transferred to the toy, silicone picks up
         | microscopic details)
        
         | linsomniac wrote:
         | Why not spend 90 seconds building it in TinkerCAD? My
         | experience is that it took a year for me to get to the point
         | where I could build it in TinkerCAD. Love it, but I really
         | struggled at first. Now it's my go-to, and you can make some
         | awesome stuff quickly, but I'm the only one in my house that
         | can do, well, pretty much anything in 90 seconds in TinkerCAD.
         | :-)
         | 
         | Why do this rather than clone a Willy? If your willy looks like
         | the sex toy in this blog post, you'd probably better see a
         | doctor.
        
       | dTal wrote:
       | The core of this technique is the use of beeswax to act as both a
       | filler/smoothing agent and mould release. A clever hack - but I'm
       | confused by some things:
       | 
       | - the assertion that 3d printed materials are not body safe; PLA
       | (the most common 3d printing material) is nontoxic and used for
       | utensils (although agreed that the layer lines are a hygiene
       | hazard)
       | 
       | - the description of the "traditional" method as printing a
       | positive shape, then casting a negative in silicone, and then
       | casting a positive _also_ in silicone (with release agent,
       | presumably because silicone bonds to itself). Why would you not
       | just print a negative directly - as indeed she later does? Is it
       | because she considers the concave surface difficult to sand
       | smooth?
       | 
       | - Why is release agent "$$$"? There are a variety of extremely
       | cheap household items that work as release agent, notably dish
       | soap.
       | 
       | - Pouring 100C beeswax into a print. This is _well_ above the
       | glass point of PLA. She doesn 't say what material she's printing
       | with, which may explain the earlier remark about not being body
       | safe.
       | 
       | - The need for any sort of release agent. Silicone does not bond
       | to thermoplastic, at all. She's not casting silicone in silicone,
       | so what's the problem?
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | - PLA as a material is at least food safe (though food safe and
         | body safe aren't the same). But! The material passes through
         | nozzles which probably have lead in them etc. even if that's of
         | negligible consequence though the main issue with making
         | something body safe is the layer lines, which retain moisture
         | and breed bacteria.
         | 
         | - yes, concave surfaces are dang near impossible to smooth.
         | 
         | - plenty of household release agents don't work in a silicone
         | to silicone mould, or impede the cure of platinum cure silicone
         | (the body safe kind), and if you bugger it up you're just
         | wasted the mould and the dildo's worth of silicone which is
         | $$$.
         | 
         | - I just used PLA. the beeswax doesn't touch it for long, you
         | literally pour it in and immediately back out. Because the
         | print is hollow on the inside and because beeswax has such a
         | low specific heat capacity it cools instantly, and this all
         | works, my pics are proof.
         | 
         | - silicone doesn't bond to PLA, no, but you need to smooth the
         | layer lines, which brings us back to point 1....
        
           | dTal wrote:
           | Thank you for replying in such useful detail!
           | 
           | I've been orbiting this array of technologies lately - 3d
           | printing + silicone, and also epoxy resin - so this is all
           | really useful info for me. Your comment about having to
           | figure out working processes by trial and error rings true.
           | I'll be sure to bear beeswax in mind - maybe it'll work some
           | magic on epoxy as well.
           | 
           | In the spirit of reciprocal knowledge sharing, I've been
           | using filler primer spray or smoothing prints. You're
           | probably aware of it already, but it seems very underrated in
           | the 3d printing community. Sands to a mirror finish amazingly
           | quickly and easily, especially under running water. Obviously
           | that's not a body safe surface, and I don't know what effect
           | it would have on silicone curing, but still - one worth
           | keeping in the toolbox.
        
             | BillieRuben wrote:
             | Which comment about trial and error sorry? I honestly
             | rarely do the same thing twice... ADHD and all. lol
             | 
             | Yes, filler primer is great and I recommend it often. I
             | think I actually mention it in the article? It's just a LOT
             | more work than pouring some wax in and out of a mould.
        
         | KaiserPro wrote:
         | > PLA (the most common 3d printing material) is nontoxic and
         | used for utensils
         | 
         | Utensils are (generally) not inserted. however more crucially
         | in this respect, depending on the mix, silicon is more
         | compliant. You want to have a bit of give. (I know I know,
         | glass dildos exist, but thats a specific, advanced usage)
        
         | h2odragon wrote:
         | I wouldn't fear a PLA thing first use; but cleaning it
         | thoroughly enough to re-use is going to be a challenge without
         | special effort applied to finishing it after printing.
         | 
         | Beeswax temp: Thermal mass of the print is probably high enough
         | that it sucks the heat out of the wax before melting much
         | surface feature. in this case, smoothing bumps is beneficial.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | Beeswax melts at about 65 degrees centigrade. Going higher
           | than that discolours it and if you go very hot, when it sets
           | it cracks. These things would seem unlikely to be an issue
           | when using it more like paint.
        
         | yarcob wrote:
         | > Why would you not just print a negative directly - as indeed
         | she later does? Is it because she considers the concave surface
         | difficult to sand smooth?
         | 
         | I think the problem with sanding a mold is that it would be
         | very hard to sand both halves equally, so you'd end up with a
         | step where the two halves meet.
         | 
         | Using the wax to smooth the mold when the two halves are
         | already stuck together is quite ingenious, as the wax will also
         | smooth the part where the halves meet.
        
         | Freak_NL wrote:
         | > [...] presumably because silicone bonds to itself [...]
         | 
         | Silicone absolutely _loves_ silicone. If you pour silicone into
         | a silicone mould you end up with one piece of silicone -- which
         | now includes the mould. So a barrier is absolutely essential.
        
           | dTal wrote:
           | Yes, that's why I typed that.
           | 
           | The question is, why make a silicone mould in the first
           | place?
        
             | yarcob wrote:
             | I guess silicone is a good material to make a seamless
             | mould of a smooth object. Since it's flexible you can
             | remove it from the original object without cutting it.
        
               | BillieRuben wrote:
               | this is the reason.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | convolvatron wrote:
       | this is totally off topic. but where did she get those scissors
       | that are in the video at the end - they are gorgeous. never
       | thought i'd have scissor envy
        
         | Levitz wrote:
         | God knows what is the actual model, but googling for "Stork
         | scissors" yields a lot of results.
        
           | BugsJustFindMe wrote:
           | I think they look more like unicorn scissors like
           | https://hiyahiyanorthamerica.shptron.com/p/hiyahiya-
           | rainbow-...
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | aren't they great? I got them at Spotlight here in Australia
         | but I've since seen them on aliexpress too. :)
        
       | throwaway387235 wrote:
       | I think 3D-printed silicone would be useful for making a condom-
       | like sleeve with fluid channels, so that males can use a diaper
       | more reliably.
        
       | d33 wrote:
       | Hm, reminds me of something:
       | 
       | http://dildo-generator.com/
       | 
       | Thus the question: what exactly is novel about the approach here?
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | the bees wax to smooth it instantly and painlessly.
        
         | 2muchcoffeeman wrote:
         | Why does it have to be novel? Maybe it's just well presented
         | instructions that work?
        
           | BillieRuben wrote:
           | I hadn't seen the beeswax smoothing done anywhere else, so I
           | felt I had to share, hence the article.
           | 
           | But yea, I dunno why it should have to be novel..
           | 
           | But hey, haters will attempt to find literally anything they
           | can to try and cut you down. I've unfortunately learned this
           | well in my time producing content.
        
         | app4soft wrote:
         | Method of 3D printing use in manufacturing soft surface solid
         | things from silicone.
        
           | ddingus wrote:
           | Yes, and useful in many contexts. What a great technique!
           | 
           | Other methods, such as solvent mists and such, can be toxic
           | and or dangerous. And doing all that costs a little time,
           | space and money. Not a huge deal, but given how simple and
           | cheap this is...
        
       | xor99 wrote:
       | The author highlights a good consideration that its not just the
       | filament (e.g. pla) but also the printing process (e.g. hotend
       | materials and bowden tubes) that may effect the body safety /
       | biocompatibility.
        
       | drummer wrote:
       | Why go through so much trouble when you can easily find a man who
       | would love to lend you his dick? Oh right, sexual suppression.
        
       | tacon wrote:
       | https://www.thingiverse.com/search?q=sex&type=things&sort=re...
       | 
       | >No results found for sex. Please try another search or upload
       | your own design.
       | 
       | Yeah, sure!
        
         | MisterBiggs wrote:
         | Cults embraces it they even have a category for it but it is
         | locked to users with an account:
         | https://cults3d.com/en/categories/naughties
        
         | yorwba wrote:
         | Add "toy"
         | https://www.thingiverse.com/search?q=sextoy&type=things&sort...
        
           | tacon wrote:
           | Wow! They aren't as prudish as it first appears.
        
         | nom wrote:
         | Good point, they also filter similar words like buttplug and
         | dildo. Sad, a niche market within a niche market. Their loss.
        
           | nom wrote:
           | Can't edit on mobile. Looks like they don't Filter "sextoy"
           | but other obvious words.
        
         | linsomniac wrote:
         | Try Thangs.com, their search engine actually works, and it also
         | produces results for objects from other sites. I've completely
         | given up on Thingiverse as of ~6 months ago.
        
         | sebazzz wrote:
         | Thingiverse word filter is case sensitive. Try again.
        
           | pixl97 wrote:
           | Why in the world would they have a case sensitive search.
        
             | linsomniac wrote:
             | Clearly you are not familiar with Thingiverse. Their slogan
             | seems to be "Why fix it if it's broke?"
        
       | kneel wrote:
       | Her name is Billie Ruben, interesting choice.
        
         | blowski wrote:
         | ...because? I'm not sure what you mean.
        
           | boomskats wrote:
           | Might be insinuating that whoever named her Billie had a
           | jaundice fetish?
           | 
           | edit: the other answer is a way better answer
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | hlieberman wrote:
           | I think it's a reference to bilirubin[1], a compound used in
           | the liver for breaking down red blood cells.
           | 
           | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilirubin
        
             | BillieRuben wrote:
             | sorta yes:
             | 
             | It's a reference to my teddy bear (Billy Rubin) who I've
             | had all my life. He was named after I made my mum's
             | bilirubin wonky in the womb, my parents have a great sense
             | of humor.
             | 
             | A few years ago I wanted to study medicine, but I knew we
             | would miss my income, so what's a girl to do to make easy
             | money while studying? ... Porn of course! So when I made my
             | porn accounts I used Billie, the name was so familiar and
             | it had a good alignment with my goals.
             | 
             | But my porn went unexpectedly viral and I kinda got
             | overwhelmed by that. And in the mean time I took up 3D
             | printing, and that's how I ended up moderating the largest
             | 3D printing community on earth under the username
             | BillieRubenCamGirl. lol.
             | 
             | I ended up meeting lotsa doctors because of the name
             | (doctors love puns as much as I do it seems) and decided
             | through talking with them I didn't want to be a dr after
             | all. Ended up starting a double degree in two other STEM
             | fields.
             | 
             | I still have the teddy, he sleeps on my bed every night.
        
           | bobthechef wrote:
           | Maybe she's full of bile.
        
             | BillieRuben wrote:
             | mean.
        
         | app4soft wrote:
         | She explained it many times.[0]
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://twitter.com/search?f=live&q=from%3ABillieRubenMake+B...
        
           | BillieRuben wrote:
           | :)
        
       | crobertsbmw wrote:
       | > So traditionally you'd have to print a blank and smooth it
       | (with loads of manual sanding and buffing), and then cast a
       | silicone mould around it, add a mold release ($$$) and THEN
       | (finally!) cast your actual sex toy.
       | 
       | The process is here to print the negative and then do a thin
       | layer of beeswax inside to smooth the layer lines from the print.
       | I haven't done either method but would like to try it out soon.
       | I'll probably stick to figurines instead of sex toys though..
        
         | ddingus wrote:
         | Or, depending on the polymer, smoothing can be done chemically.
         | 
         | This is simple, cheap and clean by comparison. I have the same
         | inclination to try it too. I think it's brilliant.
        
           | BillieRuben wrote:
           | Thanks!
        
         | SamBam wrote:
         | She mentions that it loses a fair bit of surface details, so
         | good for largish organic things, but maybe not so good for
         | miniatures?
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | WediBlino wrote:
         | If you're planning to make figurines you're better off with a
         | resin printer (as opposed to filament).
        
           | linsomniac wrote:
           | This is very true, I tried to print some figurines using
           | filament, and it was a total disaster. I'm sure there are
           | some figures and some settings of slicer and printer that
           | work, but just grabbing a fig and printing it isn't the same
           | as grabbing other things and printing them. My experience
           | based on 5-7 spools of filament printed through a rather
           | enhanced Ender 3 Pro (+BLTouch, MicroSwiss, new mobo, dual
           | gear extruder, upgraded bed springs).
           | 
           | Though, as others here mentioned, resin may not be what you
           | want either. I looked at them briefly when my son was
           | interested in painting minifigs, and decided I didn't want to
           | deal with resin and I _DEFINITELY_ didn 't want him working
           | in resin, based on the messes he makes with cereal.
        
           | tdeck wrote:
           | Resin is really nasty stuff though. Many folks may not want
           | to deal with having it in the home and disposing of it.
        
           | HWR_14 wrote:
           | It depends on the scale. I'd imaging GI Joe/Barbie scale you
           | want FDM. Minis for D&D you want resin.
        
           | cronix wrote:
           | Not to mention, way cooler to watch while printing.
        
             | BillieRuben wrote:
             | and you can add glitter!
        
         | Griffinsauce wrote:
         | > I'll probably stick to figurines instead of sex toys though
         | 
         | That sounds painful.
        
           | isoprophlex wrote:
           | Everything's a dildo when you're brave enough
        
             | p1mrx wrote:
             | Counterexample: bowling ball
        
               | malka wrote:
               | You are not brave enough.
        
             | botverse wrote:
             | My urologist friend has removed some of that everything out
             | of those brave people's bladders
        
           | barelysapient wrote:
           | Depends the figurine I guess.
        
       | linsomniac wrote:
       | You can go a long way with just 3D printing a mould in PLA and
       | then just filling it with silicone. I've done some parts this
       | way, and haven't felt the need to use mould release for either
       | the silicone from the mould, or the resulting glass reinforced
       | epoxy parts from the silicone. Not for body use in my case.
       | 
       | I modeled some plastic parts as a meta-mould to make a mould for
       | some parts I wanted to make.
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | yeah but silicone will pick up microscopic details, so you will
         | retain the grooves from your print doing it that way, which
         | retain moisture, which gives bacteria a chance to grow.
        
       | 4g wrote:
       | In my experience using beeswax in contact with platinum cure
       | silicons will cause the silicone not to set properly. For the
       | record the molds were for a different purpose.
        
         | BillieRuben wrote:
         | When using 100% pure beeswax, it seems to be an issue with just
         | Smooth On Dragon Skin. Is that what you used? I've added a note
         | to the article about it.
         | 
         | I've also had a few folk think they were using pure bees wax,
         | but noticed when they poked around on the label after that it
         | wasn't actually, it's often mixed with other oils and waxes.
        
           | 4g wrote:
           | I was using smooth-on ecoflex, the wax was bought from a
           | reputable seller. The result was a sticky uncured expensive
           | mess.
        
             | BillieRuben wrote:
             | yea, seems like it's a smooth on thing, unfortunately.
        
       | InvaderFizz wrote:
       | Not interested in her specific application, but good info none
       | the less about how to do reusable and fast 3D printed silicon
       | molds with smooth surfaces.
       | 
       | It suffers a loss of detail, but that acceptability depends
       | entirely on your intended application.
        
         | john_yaya wrote:
         | Another technique is to print in ABS and then give it an
         | acetone vapor bath - you preserve details much better, but
         | setting all that up is a pain and a little dangerous.
        
           | BillieRuben wrote:
           | Also you end up with gooey ABS to leech VOCs into your toy.
           | :/ I really worry about that method.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-10 23:00 UTC)