[HN Gopher] Scientists discover a highly potent antibody against... ___________________________________________________________________ Scientists discover a highly potent antibody against SARS-CoV-2 Author : byproxy Score : 47 points Date : 2021-10-12 17:49 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (actu.epfl.ch) (TXT) w3m dump (actu.epfl.ch) | The_rationalist wrote: | Or simply upregulate your lymphocite T by 600%.. | denton-scratch wrote: | I thought "potent" was a term referring to the strength of a | particular composition of a particular drug. I thought "powerful" | was the term that you could use to compare one drug to another, | irrespective of dose. | | Have I got it back-to-front? | hanselot wrote: | When the cine shills and bots haven't figured out what the new | script is yet... | mechanical_bear wrote: | 404? | derecerca wrote: | @dang: this should be the proper URL: | https://actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-poten... | byproxy wrote: | Oops! Yep, looks like I mis-entered the URL and can't seem to | edit. =/ | dang wrote: | No, you entered it fine, but our software has recently | begun rewriting URLs to the canonical URL if the page has | one, and this page has | //actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-potent- | antibody-again/ | | ...which isn't valid, but we might as well tweak the code | to handle such cases. In the meantime I've restored the | URL. Sorry for the error! | pvg wrote: | As the other comment says, it's a valid URL but to really | rub it in, the canonical link RFC (6596) says it's valid | and then also uses a relative URL in an example like they | were just waiting for someone to be wrong about this on | the internet. | mircea wrote: | That's a valid URL, AFAICT. | | https://www.paulirish.com/2010/the-protocol-relative-url/ | dang wrote: | Whoa! TIL | | Edit: fixed now. Thanks you guys. | mircea wrote: | Glad I could contribute something :) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-10-12 23:00 UTC)