[HN Gopher] Scientists discover a highly potent antibody against...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scientists discover a highly potent antibody against SARS-CoV-2
        
       Author : byproxy
       Score  : 47 points
       Date   : 2021-10-12 17:49 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (actu.epfl.ch)
 (TXT) w3m dump (actu.epfl.ch)
        
       | The_rationalist wrote:
       | Or simply upregulate your lymphocite T by 600%..
        
       | denton-scratch wrote:
       | I thought "potent" was a term referring to the strength of a
       | particular composition of a particular drug. I thought "powerful"
       | was the term that you could use to compare one drug to another,
       | irrespective of dose.
       | 
       | Have I got it back-to-front?
        
       | hanselot wrote:
       | When the cine shills and bots haven't figured out what the new
       | script is yet...
        
       | mechanical_bear wrote:
       | 404?
        
         | derecerca wrote:
         | @dang: this should be the proper URL:
         | https://actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-poten...
        
           | byproxy wrote:
           | Oops! Yep, looks like I mis-entered the URL and can't seem to
           | edit. =/
        
             | dang wrote:
             | No, you entered it fine, but our software has recently
             | begun rewriting URLs to the canonical URL if the page has
             | one, and this page has
             | //actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-potent-
             | antibody-again/
             | 
             | ...which isn't valid, but we might as well tweak the code
             | to handle such cases. In the meantime I've restored the
             | URL. Sorry for the error!
        
               | pvg wrote:
               | As the other comment says, it's a valid URL but to really
               | rub it in, the canonical link RFC (6596) says it's valid
               | and then also uses a relative URL in an example like they
               | were just waiting for someone to be wrong about this on
               | the internet.
        
               | mircea wrote:
               | That's a valid URL, AFAICT.
               | 
               | https://www.paulirish.com/2010/the-protocol-relative-url/
        
               | dang wrote:
               | Whoa! TIL
               | 
               | Edit: fixed now. Thanks you guys.
        
               | mircea wrote:
               | Glad I could contribute something :)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-12 23:00 UTC)