[HN Gopher] Financial Secrecy Index
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Financial Secrecy Index
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 82 points
       Date   : 2021-10-11 12:14 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (fsi.taxjustice.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (fsi.taxjustice.net)
        
       | bojangleslover wrote:
       | Private wealth has already been taxed unfortunately
        
       | _uy6i wrote:
       | This is pretty stupid if you ask me, the top of the list is just
       | stable countries with a strong tradition of rule of law.
        
         | bjt2n3904 wrote:
         | Financial secrecy, or financial privacy?
        
         | ksdale wrote:
         | Haha I thought the same thing. The more I read it, the more it
         | seemed like a list of countries where there's actually due
         | process, even for the bad guys.
        
       | howmayiannoyyou wrote:
       | Reality check:
       | 
       | - US haven status undermines despotic regimes by denying them
       | data on citizens hedging their bets with offshore accounts. This
       | provides the US leverage, intelligence, foreign direct investment
       | & tax revenue.
       | 
       | - Offshore dollar pools (eg. Eurodollars) are problem enough for
       | the US Treasury & FED's monetary policy. Absent US haven status
       | this problem would be far worse.
       | 
       | - The secrecy doesn't much apply to US citizen and less so once
       | the Democrat's $600 bank account reporting requirement is passed
       | into law.
        
         | melony wrote:
         | Ah, so it's not money laundering when we are the ones doing it.
        
       | lucideer wrote:
       | This is a great starting point, but things like BEPs mean this
       | usually more complex than one country's sole secrecy index.
        
       | trident5000 wrote:
       | More like a map of where oppressive regimes want total control
       | over your finances.
        
       | echelon wrote:
       | Russia and China score extremely well, and the US is the second
       | worst?
       | 
       | Is it fine when the ruling class can get away with moving money?
       | 
       | Who funded this?
        
         | tetromino_ wrote:
         | It's completely logical: the Russian and Chinese ruling classes
         | want to hide their ill-gotten money from taxes, from
         | journalists, and from being arbitrarily seized by greedy
         | officials and well-connected rivals. Thus, they move money from
         | the somewhat transparent Russian and Chinese institutions to
         | the safety of more murky Western economies.
        
         | collegeburner wrote:
         | No we score extremely well and Russia and China are some of the
         | worst. Privacy in finance is a great thing, KYC and reporting
         | requirements are massive violations of privacy and intolerable.
        
         | dgivney wrote:
         | > Russia and China score extremely well, and the US is the
         | second worst?
         | 
         | This is a list of countries that benefit from capital flight
         | from countries such as Russia and China.
         | 
         | > Who funded this?
         | 
         | https://taxjustice.net/our-funders/
        
           | belval wrote:
           | Page 18 of https://taxjustice.net/wp-
           | content/uploads/2021/03/Tax-Justic...
           | 
           | It's basically funded by European grants so it does not seem
           | fishy.
        
             | dgivney wrote:
             | Honestly, I know nothing about them but the largest donor
             | on that list is a USA based NGO..
             | 
             | $2 million Ford Foundation Grant:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Foundation
        
         | ksdale wrote:
         | Yes, the US is so secret we know exactly how much is hidden and
         | where. Meanwhile Russia is so transparent, wealth hoarding
         | oligarchs can't even exist. /s
        
         | kibibyte wrote:
         | The US has a few states that allow you to set up a shell
         | company with very pretty much no proof of identity. It's one
         | way that South Dakota is apparently a big tax haven now.
         | 
         | https://www.npr.org/2021/10/03/1042885263/pandora-papers-wea...
         | 
         | Planet Money has done an episode on this sort of thing in the
         | past where they found it much easier to open a shell business
         | in the US vs the rest of the world.
         | https://www.npr.org/2021/10/06/1043746410/we-set-up-an-offsh...
        
         | adventured wrote:
         | It's a pathetic joke. The US has very little real financial
         | secrecy. The Feds have trivial access to all financial
         | transactions inside of the US if they have cause to need to
         | look. Beyond that, the majority of US wealth is contained in
         | the stock market and land, both of which tend to reveal the
         | wealthy due to public records (which is how we know how much
         | land Bill Gates has been accumulating and how many shares of
         | Tesla Elon Musk owns). The US has a small number of unknown
         | super wealthy because of that, whereas China and Russia are
         | extraordinarily opaque by comparison. The US also requires its
         | politicians to report their wealth within a range. Now try to
         | get that kind of information from Putin or Xi.
        
           | stewx wrote:
           | The main issue is certain US states, such as Delaware, allow
           | you to set up anonymous shell companies. Anonymous shell
           | companies are a bit like BitTorrent. Sure, there are legal
           | uses, but there are a lot more illegal ones.
           | 
           | Planet Money did an episode in which they registered just
           | such a company in Delaware: https://www.npr.org/sections/mone
           | y/2016/03/16/470722656/epis...
        
             | ksdale wrote:
             | How much money did they manage to launder with their shell
             | company?
        
           | satellite2 wrote:
           | I think the idea is to hide from other countries. So if you
           | are a wealthy Chinese you have a much better time hiding your
           | money in Delaware than in Paris for instance.
        
           | ksdale wrote:
           | Yeah, I do taxes for a living, and people _seriously_
           | underestimate how hard it is for _anyone_ to hide a
           | substantial amount of money that was made in the U.S. As soon
           | as you want to do anything with it besides hide it under your
           | mattress, there 's going to be a record of it that either the
           | state or federal government can obtain.
        
       | eutropia wrote:
       | I clicked on the US and see that it gets loads of secrecy points
       | in all kinds of categories, but 0 points from the category of
       | "Consistent Personal Income Tax".
       | 
       | I laughed.
        
       | cookiengineer wrote:
       | Honestly this index seems flawed. Where's Monaco, Malta, or
       | Liechtenstein?
       | 
       | When we speak of finances, these countries are the top of the top
       | and literally where politicians from all over the world hide
       | their money.
        
       | fblp wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing! I setup a quarterly donation. This is
       | important work.
        
       | helloworld11 wrote:
       | Excellent ranking for those wishing to have a reasonably well
       | researched list of candidate countries for where they could place
       | their hidden funds and avoid future taxes. Bravo.
        
         | ccity88 wrote:
         | realistically you need a decent level of wealth to participate
         | in these tax havens. It's expensive to hire a lawyer who knows
         | this stuff, and even more expensive for administration and
         | execution. The people who have the level of wealth to pay for
         | this are already doing it.
        
           | orlovs wrote:
           | Totally agree. Schemes exists, but they are unavailable for
           | scmucks. As after 2008 financial crysis it was made much more
           | "exclusive" as it was before. For ordinary folks it
           | transformed. For example, in Europe now is popular zero Corp
           | tax on reinvested money.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-13 23:00 UTC)