[HN Gopher] Framework: Solving for Silicon Shortages ___________________________________________________________________ Framework: Solving for Silicon Shortages Author : pimterry Score : 159 points Date : 2021-10-23 15:45 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (frame.work) (TXT) w3m dump (frame.work) | xyx0826 wrote: | TL;DR: Framework is switching its audio codec from Realtek ALC295 | to Tempo 92HD95B. | | While I don't own a Framework I welcome this change and find it | quite interesting, partly because it seems like every laptop and | PC maker these days are putting an ALC chip on their boards. You | also don't see computer companies announcing "we're ditching chip | X for chip Y" often and this is very informative transparency. | | It feels like Realtek puts a lot of red tape around its chips. | Most notably, it's very hard to look up a datasheet for an ALC | chip unless it's a very popular part. Realtek also seem to only | provide stock and support to their biggest customers like Dell | and Gigabyte, because it sounds like Framework struggled to | secure stock, probably from a one-off source, for their first | batches and couldn't get in touch with Realtek to implement the | Smart DSP feature. | | The Tempo chip on their other hand is much more open. The | datasheet is right on the product page, and the chip has first- | class Linux support. In the integrated sound card market where | Realtek is to codec as Clorox is to bleach, I welcome attempts to | diversify the market share. | jessikat wrote: | I'm especially excited for this as Realtek codec support, at | least from looking at the Linux driver, has a substantial | quirks layer. The datasheet right there on the page makes it | quite likely that if it doesn't work out of the box with the | generic codec driver in Haiku, much more likely to get it | working. | | I do hope they don't switch back to the Realtek codec in the | future. | xyx0826 wrote: | Given that the Tempo codec works great as a feature parity | replacement (which the Framework team anticipates), it's | quite likely they will stick with it. | | The Tempo do lack the ALC's smart features but they couldn't | get the latter to work anyway... | ksec wrote: | I wonder how much more expensive is the Tempo chip? I | assume it sit somewhere in between RealTek and Cirrus | Logic? | reacharavindh wrote: | I don't need my laptop right this moment. I am waiting with my | wallet for a Ryzen 5000 series option here in Netherlands. Just | saying here in case someone needs to know there are potential | customers out here :-) | pkulak wrote: | I'm not concerned with the chip. Anything modern is plenty for | my needs. I'm waiting for a 3k screen. That's what I spend all | day staring at. | CameronNemo wrote: | You won't catch me hunched over a laptop all day. I just need | the screen for the few occasions where I am on the road or | maybe in a meeting. Most of the time I will be docking my | laptop. The ergonomics are just way better. | pkulak wrote: | Fair. I built a desktop for the first time in a decade over | the pandemic, so I'm looking for something that will | basically never be hooked in to an external monitor. | greenwoman wrote: | You'd have to be smoking crack to buy the framework laptop over | the new MBP | mrfusion wrote: | Is framework open source? | als0 wrote: | No. They make computers using ordinary PC parts. But they are | very Linux friendly and repairable. | Iolaum wrote: | Key selling point is that is fully repairable with schematics | and spare parts available. | | It does support Linux as well. | | If you are talking about whether it is open hardware I am not | sure. | gcoguiec wrote: | That's a great way to communicate around an engineering change | order/notice! | Drdrdrq wrote: | So, when can we get these laptops in EU? Pretty please? :-) | emsy wrote: | Seconded! A rough ETA would be appreciated since my MBP2013 is | on it's last legs and I'm holding out for the Framework because | I love the philosophy behind it. | bloopernova wrote: | Only if you sell the fairphone in the USA :P | phaer wrote: | Oh yes please! My x230 is aging... | gfody wrote: | they should make sound a module, then they could offer a high-end | option with something like an akm ak4490 and users could go | legacy free if they want | imperialdrive wrote: | Felt like a legit update... Looking forward to putting these | units up against the Surface line we currently deploy... I | believe they have a good chance at crushing competition! | wffurr wrote: | s/crushing competition/providing a great experience to their | customers | JasonFruit wrote: | That's how competition-crushing is done, ideally. | fabianhjr wrote: | Normally though competition crushing is done through anti- | competitive practices. | | https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Anti-competitive_practices | bscphil wrote: | Or, more charitably (?), marketing. | dan-robertson wrote: | The theme of the comment thread is that companies in the | past (example: Microsoft) got in serious trouble for | talking about crushing the competition. While companies | want to do better than the competition because it means | more sales and more revenue, they are meant to do it by | providing better products or services rather than by | causing competitor companies to go out of business | granting the survivor a monopoly, even if either | motivation leads to the same outcome. | bscphil wrote: | "providing better products or services" and "causing | competitor companies to go out of business" are related, | though, not two wholly separate ways of doing business. | If you provide a better product or service at a better | price point, you'll win more and more of the market for | the product or service. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-10-23 23:00 UTC)