[HN Gopher] Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results ___________________________________________________________________ Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results Author : Bahamut Score : 57 points Date : 2021-10-28 20:32 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.apple.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.apple.com) | throwaway4good wrote: | There is a fairly big drop (-3.4%) in the after market. | | So I guess those results are a disappointment. | [deleted] | sgt wrote: | Isn't a $0.22 dividend per common share quite low? | nabla9 wrote: | They use mostly share buybacks to return money to investors. | r0fl wrote: | Same as before. I'm surprised they didn't increase it. | [deleted] | abhv wrote: | Dividends are not an efficient mechanism to return cash to | investors. The recipient is forcefully taxed. | | Share buybacks technically accomplish the same; the | proportional increase in shareholder value should be the | same. However, investors who do not want to recognize income | that year do not have to; whereas investors who need the | dividend income can sell a small number of appreciated | shares. | rileymat2 wrote: | I need to look at this more, but don't dividends mostly | return real current earnings where share buybacks are | moving your return to future earnings which may never | exist? | | Also, many people are harmed by this tax treatment because | a couple making 80k a year pay no tax on the dividend | capital gains? | | I am just saying dividends v share buybacks are not the | same and have other effects. | ghaff wrote: | Yeah. They're different. Dividends give you cash on the | barrel each quarter that is very sticky about heading in | a downward direction--but tax treatment is pretty much | like ordinary income in most cases. | | Stock buybacks may drive stock prices upwards in an | unpredictable way that may lead to being able to sell | appreciated stock in a tax-advantaged way a couple years | out. | | Theoretically, it's all the same after tax effects but we | don't live in that theoretical world. | rileymat2 wrote: | https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/taxes/dividend-tax- | rate | | These are lower than ordinary income. | ghaff wrote: | As the article says, it depends. | dkonofalski wrote: | I think, historically, Apple's dividends have been pretty low | in general. Most of my dividends from other stocks are much | higher. | sz4kerto wrote: | Given that tech companies don't tend to pay any dividends, it's | good. | syspec wrote: | You have to take the recent split into account. | oh_sigh wrote: | No, since there was a 4:1 split last August. $0.22/share is | historically high: | | https://investor.apple.com/dividend-history/default.aspx | jbverschoor wrote: | I don't think it is. The dividend yield was in the 1.5-2% | range about 10 years ago iirc. | zsmi wrote: | There was a 4:1 split in July, 2020 so it's comparable to the | $0.82 dividend Apple was issuing earlier in 2020. | | https://investor.apple.com/dividend-history/default.aspx | MangoCoffee wrote: | >"This year we launched our most powerful products ever, from | M1-powered Macs to an iPhone 13 lineup that is setting a new | standard for performance and empowering our customers to create | and connect in new ways," said Tim Cook | | one platform for all their products. (one ring to rule them all) | how much did Apple saved by going with their own in-house | designed chip? | jbverschoor wrote: | Cost of products went from 70% to 66% and will only decrease I | presume | darwinwhy wrote: | This is very good news for them, since their services revenue | looks to be at risk due to antitrust scrutiny. | syspec wrote: | You keep repeating that, are you trying to will it into | existence? | colinmhayes wrote: | Google just cut their fee by 15%. Apple can't be too far | behind. | kube-system wrote: | I think it's factual statement. When regulators are | investigating one of your business practices, that is a | business risk. | | https://www.reuters.com/technology/apple-likely-face-doj- | ant... | | https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-eu- | antitrust-re... | spsful wrote: | I've never heard of this before. Are you talking about | services like Apple pay, arcade, tv+, fitness+, icloud+? | klelatti wrote: | Presumably App Store fees as the 30% is under scrutiny / | threat in lots of jurisdictions. | Spartan-S63 wrote: | Then it's good news they're branching out their services | beyond just the App Store commission. | klelatti wrote: | Indeed. Actually I think the impact will be less than | many expect - it's definitely not going to zero! | jbverschoor wrote: | Yup.. watch out aws, gcp, azure | zsmi wrote: | > as we continue to make progress toward our goal of reaching a | net cash neutral position over time | | Can someone more business savvy explain what that means? | sandymcmurray wrote: | This started in 2018. See | https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/02/02/understanding-appl... | pdpi wrote: | Apple has massive cash reserves that it can't really put to | use. That cash isn't doing much of anything for anybody, so | growing it any further is pointless. Going cash neutral here | means "instead of uselessly adding to our cash reserves, we're | going to aggressively dispose of our revenue", which presumably | means dividends (they wouldn't have the cash reserves they do | if they thought they had other productive ways to spend the | money) | novok wrote: | Apple could hire more engineers to make it's software less | buggy at least and to fix a lot of long time small | annoyances. And to double their devtools engineer count to | make the entire company and all of their external developers | more effective. | pwinnski wrote: | You think adding more engineers would make their software | _less_ buggy? Really? This seems contrary to literally | everything I have ever read, experienced, or in any way | known for my entire career, including reading books written | about software engineering 30+ years ago. | Gigachad wrote: | They could create more products with their own teams. | Apples cloud offering pales in comparison to Google's and | part of the reason is they are just missing too many | services. iCloud web feels like a bare minimum effort | that doesn't get any attention. | | I don't know how successful this would be, but they could | also start building and selling more apps/programs but | perhaps this could be seen as anti competitive. | rsj_hn wrote: | One way it can work is if devs are already overcommitted | on multiple projects, so letting them focus more does | help. E.g. horizontal scaling, rather than piling more | devs onto the same project. | iamcreasy wrote: | Isn't cash looses its value over time due to inflation? Why | Apple maintains a cash reserve? | HWR_14 wrote: | I believe the "cash reserve" isn't pure cash, but instead | very liquid assets. | ghaff wrote: | "Cash" in balance sheet accounting-speak isn't limited to | the dollar bills under Tim Cook's mattress. It refers to a | large number of essentially "cash equivalent" things that | can be converted to cash quickly and easily, albeit at | essentially risk-free rates of return. | | You maintain a cash reserve so that, if there is a | (hopefully) short-term market correction, you're not stuck | with having to sell assets in a dip to meet payroll, etc. | Not really much different from people in that regard | although obviously at a different scale. | qeternity wrote: | Apple owns a hedge fund (the largest in the world) to do | just this. | | Braeburn Capital. | kuratkull wrote: | They have it stored around the world, moving it to the US | would force them to pay taxes | mikeyouse wrote: | Only in an accounting sense is their money stored "around | the world". It's all managed by their Nevada investment | company Braeburn Capital. They can freely move it to | banks in the US or to anywhere else they need it, it's | only "overseas" in the sense that they recognized the | revenue elsewhere. | | Cash and cash equivalents is the line on the balance | sheet and includes things like T-Bills and other low-risk | investments. Apple almost certainly does better than | inflation and regardless, it's completely normal treasury | management to return ~0% since if your shareholders | wanted exposure to riskier assets, they'd buy those | assets with their own money. | colinmhayes wrote: | > They can freely move it to banks in the US or to | anywhere else they need it | | But then they'd have a massive tax bill. | [deleted] | Angostura wrote: | I suppose it could also mean increased investment in plant, | R&D. aquisitions or reduced margins. | smoldesu wrote: | I'd hope that money could be put towards researching ways | to make their machines less fragile, or how to engineer an | M.2 slot in a professional device with more than enough | room. Maybe a thinner camera? | [deleted] | matwood wrote: | As other explained, it's to keep cash inflows and outflows as | close to even as possible. They have enough cash for future | investments and thus don't need to stockpile any more. Apple | has been saying this for awhile, and at this point I see it as | a joke/humblebrag ('we're making so much money we literally | can't spend it all'). | smoldesu wrote: | It's not a joke when the SEC isn't laughing. | nabla9 wrote: | It means that they plan neither accumulate or decrease their | net cash holdings. | | No dividends or stock buybacks to reduce cash, but no | accumulating it either. | [deleted] | klelatti wrote: | FT reporting that sales $6bn lower due to component shortages- | that's a substantial hit. | darwinwhy wrote: | Services revenue is at risk due to increased antitrust scrutiny | worldwide. The more Apple focuses on services, the bigger the | potential downside on their valuation. | neom wrote: | On the plus side, they have ~24 years of runway in the bank | just in case things go south. :) | klelatti wrote: | Gross margin on the the increase in services sales looks | astonishing. Has there been a one off increase in eg fees for | Google search in services revenue? | Synaesthesia wrote: | It always had a lot of potential in terms of profitability, | theoretically you can get the marginal cost of a digital item | to nearly zero if you have a large scale. | klelatti wrote: | Agreed but lots of Apple's growing services don't have low | marginal costs - Apple Music - or they are investing heavily | - Apple TV - so this seemed a bit surprising. | lvl100 wrote: | iPhone 13 is not going to sell well. And while I believe they | will sell a good amount of laptops this holiday season, they are | relatively low margin products and do not represent cross selling | opportunities as you do with phones. | | This is to say, Apple "needs" a new major product. Car is a | moonshot but I personally think they can easily tackle the gaming | space. They have all the right pieces to create $500B market cap. | dano wrote: | Is that 500B in annual revenue maybe? Apples current market cap | is $2.5T. | 0x00000000 wrote: | A VR/AR play seems inevitable too | ghaff wrote: | At some point, probably. Very unclear when and what it looks | like at this point. Aside from niche commercial use cases, I | certainly haven't seen anything that especially interests me. | Gigachad wrote: | For some reason Apple seems to pay no attention to anything | other than casual games. They completely crippled the mac | gaming scene which was doing OK when they killed 32bit and | never implemented vulkan support. IMO they can't embrace VR | without going back and helping the game developer scene in | getting the tooling they need to make mac support easy. | windowsrookie wrote: | The iPhone 13 has a ~3 week shipping estimate right now. So it | seems to be selling just fine. Maybe that's due to the chip | shortage, but regardless, they are selling as many as they can | make right now. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-10-28 23:00 UTC)