[HN Gopher] Hegel Today ___________________________________________________________________ Hegel Today Author : hooboy Score : 56 points Date : 2021-10-29 20:38 UTC (2 days ago) (HTM) web link (aeon.co) (TXT) w3m dump (aeon.co) | humanistbot wrote: | Ah yes, the man who believed that the human struggle was a | deterministic process of synthesis crashing into antithesis over | and over again, with each new generation overturning the prior | and then regressing back a bit, building from small tribes to | modern civilization. A process of continual improvement that, | according to Hegel, can be logically derived from first | principles so that the arc of civilization just happens to | culminate in the greatest accomplishment of reason understanding | itself: the reformed Prussian state of 1807. | medo-bear wrote: | here is an excellent archive of his works, including hypertext | and diagrams of his logical system | | Hegel by HyperText: | | https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm | | Visualiation of the Science of Logic: | | http://autio.github.io/projects/scienceoflogic/ | bluquark wrote: | For those new to Hegel, _The Accessible Hegel_ by philosopher | Michael Allen Fox is a great nutshell introduction book. | | As a software engineer, I was surprised to see how some of | Hegel's ideas describe dynamics I've observed in my career. His | dialectical process resembles how software systems evolve over | time, and his "Spirit" reminds me of the ferment of ideas and | collaboration on the Internet. The beauty of Hegel's rich texts | is that each generation of readers brings him back to life in a | new way. | Barrin92 wrote: | Reminds me of the Foucault quote | | _" Truly to escape Hegel involves an exact appreciation of the | price we have to pay to detach ourselves from him. It assumes | that we are aware of the extent to which Hegel, insidiously | perhaps, is close to us; it implies a knowledge, in that which | permits us to think against Hegel, of that which remains | Hegelian. We have to determine the extent to which our anti- | Hegelianism is possibly one of his tricks directed against us, | at the end of which he stands, motionless, waiting for us"_ | | A another engineer / not-trained philosopher I was also | surprised how intuitive Hegel's ideas were when I started to | read philosophy on my own, having had the idea in my head that | he's not understandable at all. (Of course that's not to say he | isn't actually difficult at a higher level that probably went | over my head) | kardianos wrote: | Align yourself with truth, not dialectics. | | Down with Hegal. | throwaway2331 wrote: | Hegel's views on education seem to mirror policy (almost 1:1) | in the U.S. Perhaps, if only because the Prussian education | system was imported into our culture, by our Founding Robber | Baron fathers. | | Unfortunately, It'll be hard to go against his views, since | they've been baked into almost every child's subconscious as | "this is just how life is." | culi wrote: | Interesting. Could you give an example of education policy | that can be traced to Hegel's views? | throwaway2331 wrote: | I cannot. | | I can only make observations that Hegel's writings on | education mirror the realities of U.S. public (and most | private) schools -- if only because he was a teacher in the | "Prussian System," (itself, a reactionary thing born of | Frederick William III's loss of face from losing to | Napoleon) and thus his views were molded by his culture and | the time he lived in. | | I don't think Hegel really had any say in the matter -- or | was that popular (or even heard of) among policymakers of | the 19th and 20th centuries. Only that he is a window into | the soul (or rather its destruction) of his nation at the | time. | philosopher1234 wrote: | How are dialectics opposed to truth? | dang wrote: | " _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something._" | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | gtsop wrote: | Seeing people getting excited about hegel is like seeing a kid | learning physics and getting excited about newton's laws. Surely, | it's a step forward to one's individual knowledge, it is a | stepping stone, but the human intelect has gone beyond that and | there are bigger problems to be solved. | | So, when adressing an individual, props for discovering a great | philosopher. When adressig a community of people/philosophers | going back to hegel though... ouch... that's a regression... | | My fear (for lack of a better word) is that people now portray | hegel as something progressive. Whereas it should be more of | those journeys we do as devs, where we take a closer look at some | of the basic low level tools we use (eg read the docs of a | language, or linux, or bash), learn them more in depth and then | go back to doing more advanced stuff using that knowledge. | paganel wrote: | I'm not a philosopher by any means but I do believe that | philosophy is actually the history of philosophy (or a very | close approximation of that), and for that reason Hegel or | Thomas Aquinas or Epicurus are as contemporary now when it | comes to philosophy as they were when they were alive. | | Yes, there are ups and downs in their reception (for example | the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas has had a long hiatus from | public perception in the 1700s and the 1800s) but that only | happened because of our different way to read/interpret the | history of philosophy hence philosophy itself (the materialists | in France and the empiricists in Britain weren't that fond of | Aquinas). | JacksonGariety wrote: | Yes! Also, plug for my Hegel blog: http://hegelsbagels.net/ | defen wrote: | I was wondering who had been printing these out and posting | them on telephone poles around Portland. | JacksonGariety wrote: | You caught me! | culi wrote: | Continental philosophy is making a comeback! The kids love Zizek | Emma_Goldman wrote: | 'Continental' philosophy never went anywhere, it was only | sidelined among certain parts of the Anglophone academy. The | analytic-continental distinction is nonsensical to begin with, | given that one is a style, the other a geography. | sndksb wrote: | "the me-you distinction is nonsensical to begin with, given | that one is an experience, the other an organism" | recuter wrote: | I find him to be a bit of a character, and a lovable one at | that, but can't bring myself to actually sit down and | listen/read because of it - am I missing out? | [deleted] | medo-bear wrote: | its cool that hegel is being thought about again in | professional philosophy, but zizek is not mentioned in the | article | RNCTX wrote: | again? | | we are all rats trapped in Hegel's maze until the apocalypse | ;). | [deleted] | [deleted] | B1FF_PSUVM wrote: | > Thus, not only was Hegel's system grandiose metaphysics, it was | grandiose theology as well. | | Modern theology is a lot more fun than the stuff they worked with | in Aquinas' time. Dangerous, too. | | > And last, the obscurity of Hegel's writing made rejecting | Hegelian philosophy all the easier. After all, who could tell | what he was actually saying? | | But then interpreting the prophet is probably a more secure job | ... | | > Unravelling his turgid prose turns out to be worth the effort, | affording us glimpses of how things 'hang together' that others | miss. | | On the other hand, Schopenhauer (as anti-Hegel as they come) hit | quite a few good points writing clear and elegant prose, even | tossing out witty essays as a sort of topping. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-10-31 23:00 UTC)