[HN Gopher] C3: A "cool" route to the Higgs boson and beyond ___________________________________________________________________ C3: A "cool" route to the Higgs boson and beyond Author : noslenwerdna Score : 47 points Date : 2021-11-01 20:42 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (arxiv.org) (TXT) w3m dump (arxiv.org) | knzhou wrote: | This is a new proposal, fresh on the arXiv today, from a group of | U.S. particle physicists. The introduction is very readable and | lays out the mission clearly: | | > We can now confidently claim that the "Standard Model" of | particle physics (SM) is established. At the same time, we are | more and more strongly persuaded that this SM is incomplete. | [...] It is now common to describe the SM as an "effective" | theory that should be derived from some more fundamental theory | at higher energies. But we have almost no evidence on the | properties of that theory. | | > Our successes have become a liability in reaching this goal. | Scientists from other fields now have the impression that | particle physics is a finished subject. They question our | motivations to go on to explore still higher energies. The scale | of an energy frontier collider is also challenging to the young | people in our field. They need to see qualitatively new | capabilities realized during their active scientific careers. | [...] That is where the urgency lies. | | > [T]he entire C3 program could be sited in the United States. | With the cancellation of the Superconducting Super Collider and | the end of Tevatron operations the US has largely abandoned | construction of domestic accelerators at the energy frontier. C3 | offers the opportunity to realize an affordable energy frontier | facility in the US. This may be crucial to realize a Higgs | factory in the near term, and it will also position the US to | lead the drive to the next, higher energy stage of exploration. | | The main innovation is that they propose to use non- | superconducting cavities, which allow much higher accelerating | fields, cooled to increase their quality factor. The resulting | shorter length dramatically decreases the cost, to an estimated | $4 billion, which is 80% to 90% less than other proposals. Of | course, $4 billion is no small amount of money, but for | perspective that's about equal to the monthly budget of the | National Institutes of Health, a third of the cost of the James | Webb Space Telescope, or 2% of the total cost of the space | shuttle. | 01100011 wrote: | Where are we at with femtosecond laser driven accelerators? It | seemed like there were promises of table-top accelerators in | the near future. | milliams wrote: | Could the title be changed to: | | C3: A "Cool" Route to the Higgs Boson and Beyond | drfuchs wrote: | Or at least corrected to $C^3$, though downloading the source | file shows: | | \def\CCC{C$^{3}$~} | blowski wrote: | I will confess I thought someone was using Excel to look for | it. | dang wrote: | Sure. Done. | ISL wrote: | Generally when papers like this come out, there are a couple of | decades' history behind them. | | (Disclaimer: I'm an experimental physicist, but don't have domain | knowledge in the subtleties of modern accelerator-cavity design, | which is both an art and a science. Most modern accelerators, | including LHC, are driven with superconducting niobium cavities.) | | Since essentially every author is at SLAC, I suspect that there | is a strong cold-copper research group there. | | Can anyone with domain-knowledge summarize the generally-accepted | strengths/weaknesses/risks of cold-copper accelerator designs? | potiuper wrote: | Should try convincing the Saudis to bankroll it and put it under | the 100 mile long line city; add it as part of the tourist | attraction. China could throw in some money too to get more time | as the Saudis would be more neutral to them than Japan. | avz wrote: | The paper describes a design for a linear accelerator that would | reach 250GeV in center of mass frame and that may be extended to | 550GeV (see section 2) and even multi-TeV (see section 5). | | I was curious how this compares against LHC which Wikipedia [1] | says reached record 13TeV total collision energy. However, it | isn't clear whether Wikipedia cites energy in center of mass | frame that could be directly compared. | | Does anyone know how the two accelerators would compare in this | respect? In particular, would the proposed C3 accelerator | actually achieve higher total collision energy than LHC or is it | instead hoped that future extensions of a C3 accelerator would | exceed LHC's capabilities? | | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider | tambourine_man wrote: | "with a compact 8 km footprint" | chroem- wrote: | Has the LHC produced technological advances that are used outside | of particle physics? I am struggling to think of any. | ampdepolymerase wrote: | It has created a ton of jobs for instrumentation engineers and | PhDs. It has also brought many economic benefits to | Switzerland. | MauranKilom wrote: | I have no direct insight, but from what I gather, the amount of | data generated there is staggering (1 petabyte/second raw, 1 | petabyte/day after filtering). Storing and processing this much | data certainly required immense technological advances (which | have been shared with the community at large). Again, my | impression from far outside. | | But fundamental research like this does not have short-term | prosperity or technological breakthroughs as main priority | anyway, so I'm not sure why you're so concerned about that. | mhh__ wrote: | Is it not the case that a lot of machine learning research was | done to make the data processing at LHC possible? | | There is literally civilizations worth of knowledge generated | by projects like this, not all of it exactly commercially | useful but if you bump into it and they've solved your problem | or written your tutorial better than you it's very nice to | have. | posnet wrote: | It created White Rabbit[0], a system for sub nanosecond time | keeping precision over ethernet. It is now used in many | financial exchanges to ensure fairness for market participants. | [1] | | (0): https://white-rabbit.web.cern.ch/ | | (1): https://www.eurex.com/ex- | en/support/initiatives/archive/high... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-11-01 23:00 UTC)