[HN Gopher] Paper Website: Start a tiny website from your notebook ___________________________________________________________________ Paper Website: Start a tiny website from your notebook Author : azhenley Score : 66 points Date : 2021-11-10 13:39 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (paperwebsite.com) (TXT) w3m dump (paperwebsite.com) | JasonFruit wrote: | I'm not trying to shallowly dismiss this, but it's frankly pretty | shallow. It's just OCR as a service: blog posts, but you don't | have to type, and you have to write really carefully so it | doesn't accidentally make you look illiterate. I believe that | even the people to whom this appeals will quickly become | disenchanted. | cwales95 wrote: | That was my feeling too. Calling it "magic" might be stretching | things just a bit. | thih9 wrote: | > Only 100 available. Get yours before its gone. | | That's unexpected. Is there any context? | | Edit: looks like this is for a discounted $8.25/month plan; the | regular plan is $10/month. | 094459 wrote: | I love this idea. Could open up blogging to whole new audience s | kej wrote: | If you like the idea of writing on paper and then doing digital | things with it, I have been really pleased with the RocketBook | line of reusable notebooks. They don't do the automatic blog | hosting like this, but there's also no recurring fee. Just a | simple notebook, a simple phone app, and files that show up in my | Google Drive (or DropBox or email or wherever). | | (No relation beyond happy repeat customer) | paxys wrote: | Neat, although I was hoping the "paper" aspect of it would be | emphasized more in some way, especially for the reader. This is | essentially a hosted blog, and every OS/platform/keyboard app | already supports OCR. | | > Start for the price of a coffee ($8.25/mo) | | It's funny watching the inflation in the price of a cup of coffee | in tech marketing vs the real world. | pfundstein wrote: | This must be a starbucks "coffee" for that price. | Waterluvian wrote: | A Starbucks coffee is like $5 Canadian and I find even that | to be ridiculous. | paxys wrote: | The largest size of the fanciest coffee you can get (mocha | chocolate frappucino whatever) is still like $5.50 in the | middle of San Francisco, and I'm sure cheaper elsewhere. A | regular Starbucks roast is 2 bucks, actually on the cheaper | side compared to other coffee shops. | eigengrau5150 wrote: | Pretty sure anybody with a modicum of skill with HTML and the | patience to do their own transcription can do this themselves and | host it on Netlify. | PinkMilkshake wrote: | This is pretty neat. The generated blogs are minimalist (in the | good sense); They're easy to look at and read. The HTML it | generates is not bad either. | | If I had a concern it would be this part: | Although it's very good, there can be instances where it makes | mistakes. If you find that your handwriting is often being picked | up incorrectly, here are some tips to reduce errors: * | Make sure you are using a high quality camera to capture an image | of your page. You can upload files of up to 5mb. * Try to | make your handwriting as large and neat as you can. * Keep | line spacing consistent throughout your writing. It can help to | use a ruled notebook. * Ensure each line starts from the | same left-hand position of your page. | | I think this kind of product being successful relies too heavily | on It Just Works for it to have these caveats. Personally, I | can't write like above; My writing is all over the place. | | Also this from the app description: NOTE: You | must have a Paper Website account before using this app. | | I feel like you should be able to do everything from the app. | Install it, create an account, choose your domain name, and start | posting. | | Still, cool product, I hope it goes well. I'm sure there are | people out there that this would remove a major hurdle for. | | And well done for building something from scratch by yourself! | zellyn wrote: | > I feel like you should be able to do everything from the app. | Install it, create an account, choose your domain name, and | start posting. | | They would have to pay Apple 30% of the subscriptions. | tsuujin wrote: | 15% until they're making more than $1m/year. | paxys wrote: | Stripe is under 3%, and at scale the prices go down rather | than up. | Hamuko wrote: | Actually 30% for the first year of a subcription and 15% | for any subsequent years of that subscription when it comes | to auto-renewing subscriptions. | tinyprojects wrote: | Hey! I'm the creator of Paper Website. This is the seventh tiny | project I've built over the past 18 months - I've been | documenting the whole process on my blog: | https://tinyprojects.dev | | I built Paper Website because I wanted a quick and easy way to | start a daily blog. I get distracted when I write on my laptop, | but I love writing using pen and paper - so I set out to build | this. | | I'm obviously very biased, but there's something about writing | blog posts using pen and paper that is extremely fun and | liberating. It's given me great joy just publishing my unfiltered | thoughts onto the internet straight from my pen - it reminds me | of all the unfocused blogs of the good old days. | | I'm also weirdly very consistent at writing now - I've been | posting for 40 days straight using this method (here's my daily | blog: https://daily.tinyprojects.dev). It's not for everyone, but | I love it. | | Thanks for submitting this - if you have any questions I'm happy | to answer them! | voldemort1968 wrote: | I want to like ideas like this but it's been done before and | rarely gains traction for most users. | | We've seen this with smart notebooks that let you write with | either a smart pen or a smart pad and immediately digitize and | OCR. We also already have most of this today on our phones via | built-in text scanning with OCR and the ability to easily copy | and paste into any blogging application of your choosing. | | I don't know if there's really enough efficiencies to be gained | here, especially any that overcome the lock in required to use | this product. | rexreed wrote: | How much of the AI is really automated, NLP AI and how much of it | is human-augmented Amazon Mechanical Turk-level Human as an AI | (Augmented Intelligence or Pseudo-AI)? | heurisko wrote: | The video autoplayed for me, with sound. | | I'm sure the website is good, but that is super obnoxious to me. | | Edit: using a phone, so maybe it was a button press that | activated sound. | bogwog wrote: | I thought all browsers blocked that stuff nowadays. Which | browser are you using? | | On my phone it autoplayed, but muted. | heurisko wrote: | Firefox on Android. | superkuh wrote: | I'm not trying to complain about how the website is implemented, | but, all I get is a blank gray screen no matter how many JS | domains I whitelist. The only functional bit is the 3rd party | 'crisp' chat thing in the lower right. | | I think for most people the best option is running a static | webserver, forwarding the port, and then copying .html and media | files into folders in ~/www/ (or whatever). | danShumway wrote: | This is just an off-the-cuff guess, but I wonder if you're | ironically not blocking _enough_ Javascript? | | The page loads for me as long as I allow 1st party scripts. I | don't have XHR turned on for the site. Iframes obviously don't | work, but everything else seems functional: navigation, | controls. I don't see a chat option anywhere, I guess I'm | blocking that. | | Just purely a guess, may not be the real issue, and you may | already be doing that anyway. But I've run into websites where | it feels like half of their JS exists to break the other half, | and when I reduce down to only 1st-party, everything suddenly | starts working better. | [deleted] | vgel wrote: | Hmm, it's an interesting idea. I feel like the finished websites | are sort of _bland_ though. I wonder if leaning into a more messy | / paperlike aesthetic would make the product feel more fun, since | to me I feel like wanting to make a website from paper (rather | than, say, googledocwebsite.com) is a choice someone would make | if they really love paper and notebooks and that sort of | aesthetic. | jgtrosh wrote: | I wonder if it could be possible to preserve the picture of the | paper, with the OCR'd text selectable and positioned on the | paper, a la PDF. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-11-11 23:00 UTC)