[HN Gopher] Nukemap ___________________________________________________________________ Nukemap Author : room505 Score : 15 points Date : 2021-11-11 22:17 UTC (43 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (nuclearsecrecy.com) (TXT) w3m dump (nuclearsecrecy.com) | smoldesu wrote: | I remember playing with this on my laptop in middle school. That | was one of the weirdest trips to the principal's office I ever | took. | scrumper wrote: | This is perennial, and no less terrifying for it. | | There was briefly a 3D version integrated with Google Earth that | was even more depressing. | | Also check out (by the same developer, Alex Wallerstein) | MissileMap, where you can plant a launch platform on a map (sub, | silo etc.), assign it a missile and a warhead, and see which | parts of the earth you can turn to glass. Stiff drink helps; all | a bit close to home for this cold war kid. | hunterb123 wrote: | I find it assuring. There's so many it's such a large deterrent | to escalating war. Noone would win. | Waterluvian wrote: | It's also a deterrent for actually getting involved and doing | the right thing. | | World powers can't directly fight anymore so Russia takes | chunks of Europe every so often. China does the same. Ukraine | and Taiwan, for example, lose out. We pretend there is peace. | kzrdude wrote: | Domination/Hegemony has been the only sense of peace | historically. In that sense, I think that the continued | stability of the United States as a prosperous and well-run | democracy is very important for the world. It looks shaky | though, and it's partly outside my control. What do I know, | I'm in Europe. Europe is certainly not projecting any | hegemony around. | Waterluvian wrote: | Yeah that resonates with me. There's rarely peace, just | quiet, created forcibly by a dominant actor. | phtrivier wrote: | The current situation in Europe is telling : why bother | with sending nukes on other countries when you can threaten | them with "bombarding you with migrants" ? Or when you can | retaliate by "freezing financial assets" ? | | M.A.D. is a deterrent for total nuclear war. It's not a | deterrent for war. One thaught "trade" would work, but it's | still not perfect. | JasonFruit wrote: | I would find it more reassuring if there were more evidence | that countries are rational where war is concerned. A | recently-concluded twenty-year war to remove and reinstate | the Taliban is not encouraging. | germinalphrase wrote: | Allow me to introduce you to "countervalue targeting" as part | of what "winning" means here. | lumost wrote: | One concerning item with recent events is that no one can | plausibly point to a nuclear "red line" in most of the | existing flash points. | | The historic red lines in the cold war were either one side | reaching a first-strike position, or an unstoppable ground | invasion in which both sides soldiers were directly involved | and tactical nuclear weapons would usefully repel the | invasion. Even then NATO troop deployments in Germany during | the cold war reflect both a risk that this tipping point | wouldn't trigger a nuclear war - as well as carefully | calculated strategies to ensure that the risk of a nuclear | escalation was high such as by stationing tactical nuclear | weapons in Germany. | | It's difficult to identify a similar red line in a likely | conflict between any of the major nuclear powers. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-11-11 23:00 UTC)