[HN Gopher] Daddy isn't coming back ___________________________________________________________________ Daddy isn't coming back Author : chesterfield Score : 109 points Date : 2021-11-17 20:56 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.ft.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.ft.com) | SapporoChris wrote: | I have a black thought on this. I would be happy if someone | corrected me. When something breaks, sometimes we repair it, | sometimes we throw it out. The more valuable the item, the more | we will spend to fix it. However even with the most valuable | items, we sometimes reluctantly decide that it is broken beyond | repair. Are people like this? Are some simply too broken to fix? | I feel awful thinking this, but I wonder if there is some truth | to it. | whalesalad wrote: | You should not feel awful saying this. | jstx1 wrote: | If you think about it coldly, that's probably true - there are | a bunch of different human-mental states, why would all of them | be reparable? It's more likely that some are and some aren't. | But all of this is difficult to measure so regardless of what | state you're in, you do the best you can with what you have. | slx26 wrote: | I do definitely believe people can be too broken to fix _in | certain ways_. I feel like this about some parts of myself. But | the thing is, that we can 't say someone is too broken to fix | as a whole, because the paths to be are virtually infinite. So | that's why most people intuitively lean towards "you can't | never lose hope". I'd say they are intuitively right this time, | and yet people can also be too broken to fix in some ways. They | are not mutually exclusive. | | Now, that doesn't say much about whether one should try to | overcome trauma or try to bury it. That depends a lot on the | context, the direction you would like to move towards and the | support you have to do it. | staticautomatic wrote: | I think the answer must be an unequivocal yes, because there | are people who exhaust all of their options for intervention | and then kill themselves. | philwelch wrote: | It's a hard question to ask about mental health, but it seems | like an obvious conclusion when it comes to physical health: | | https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/07/17/who-by-very-slow-decay... | edmcnulty101 wrote: | This is ultimately a nature vs nurture debate. | | Are humans the way they are due to their inherent 'nature'? Are | they genetically set in stone, programmed and minimally | changing from a set point(like an object)? | | Or are human's the way they are by 'nurture' and does their | environment influence their essence and with a changed external | environment they can change as well? | | Science seems to believe it's a bit of both. Look at twin | studies and epigenetic expression of schizophrenia for | examples. | | The issue I see with your argument is that it assumes that | human's are like objects and therefore heavily 'nature' based. | | I think science leans towards more of a balance of nature and | nurture. | lazypenguin wrote: | Objectively, it's possible to be "too broken" to be fixed (e.g. | acute blunt force trauma, malignant tumor, etc.) where the only | "fix" is palliative care. Although, I think technically we | would say: "too broken to fix based on our CURRENT tools, | knowledge and resources". It's an interesting thought | experiment to think about how advanced can we become where | anything is fixable? | NikolaNovak wrote: | In addition, this gets complicated VERY quickly; it's | relatively easy to say "This leg is broken; it is not right; | it needs to be fixed and changed for better". | | With mental illnesses though, it's difficult to | comprehensively, objectively, universally define | "right/correct/well" and "broken/incorrect". | | We all perceive the external world through a faulty set of | sensors and interpretations which trigger some mental | processes and reactions. It's difficult to mark some such | perception/processing as "broken, not worth living". My gut | feel is that it's more about finding appropriate environment. | | Additionally, non-living items are frequently judged based on | their utility; "too broken to fix" is related to "cheaper to | replace than to fix". With human beings and mental care - not | only is it hard to define "Broken" let alone "too broken", | it's far harder to define "not feasible to repair" - though | of course, when it comes to public policy, such choices are | made daily, by necessity. Only so much money to be invested | into so many programs. | | And while I'm rambling, note that myself, and many others, | there is an inherent double-standard: my threshold for myself | being too broken to fix is far far lower (and I'm a massive | proponent of voluntary euthanasia, for myself) than for | others (I don't want anybody in my life to leave ever) | akiselev wrote: | There's a decent Stargate Atlantis episode along these | lines called Miller's Crossing. The chief scientist McKay | gets kidnapped along with his sister (herself a brilliant | scientist) by a billionaire trying to use alien nanite | technology to cure his daughter of leukemia. In order to | incentivize McKay to cooperate and fix the nanite coding, | the guy injects McKay's sister with the nanites. | | McKay figures it out but the daughter ends up dying | because, although the nanites cure her leukemia, they also | cure an undiagnosed heart murmur by stopping her heart and | repairing it thus depriving her brain of oxygen and leaving | her braindead. | | They didn't have much time to explore the philosophical | implications (sadly far too common for these scifi shows) | but the rest of the episode is a race to disable the | nanites before they try to "fix" the sister's epilepsy, | including breaking her bones to create work for the | nanites. | | The only type of nanites in the SG universe that could | repair a human being without causing crippling unintended | consequences were hyper-intelligent replicator nanites that | were hell bent on destroying humanity because they had | abandonment issues. | monkeybutton wrote: | Mental illness is not contagious and it is not entirely | learned either. By fixing it, you are changing the physical | substrate of the mind. Did you fix anything at all? Or did | you destroy one mind and create a new one in its place. | wizzwizz4 wrote: | Ignorance is not contagious and it is not entirely learned | either. By teaching anyone anything, you are changing the | physical substrate of the mind. Did you fix anything at | all? Or did you destroy one mind and create a new one in | its place. | neolefty wrote: | I think that is a fine question to ask in this forum. Maybe not | a question that people in the situation described can handle of | course! | | Related may be "Too broken to imagine (myself) being fixed." | Which is probably more of a failure of imagination (and | possibly of support) than a reality. | | And then you get into what does "fixed" mean, vs "good", in a | _person_ ... | seoulmetro wrote: | The problem is that we know how to fix anything we make and/or | can see. We can't make or see the human mind just yet, so we | definitely struggle to fix it. | rossdavidh wrote: | There are, certainly, medical situations where we cannot fix | it, and we let them go. In fact, most of us will meet our end | in such a way, eventually. The difficult thing about mental | illness, is that we know so little about how it works (and much | of what we think we know is incorrect), so that the solution | might be really close at hand, but we haven't found it yet. | | We know when someone's physical health, for example a rapidly | spreading cancer, has passed the point of no return. We don't | understand mental health well enough to know that. In rare | cases, of course, like brain damage from trauma that leaves the | person in a vegetative state, we know that it will never get | better, but in cases like this article I don't think we ever | know one way or the other. | rksprst wrote: | I don't think your example works - when a valuable item is | broken beyond repair that is a fact (based on known physics / | science). If I snap a ruler into two pieces I know there is no | way to bring it back to the state it was originally in - a | single piece. We can glue it back and use other mechanisms but | it won't be exactly the same - we know this definitively. The | same cannot be said about mental illness. | | We do not have the knowledge and science to make such a | statement about mental illness. In fact, medical science and | research shows the opposite, that we are learning more and | getting better at treating mental illness. | | Mental illness is usually not a downhill spiral to death, but a | roller coaster that you can jump out of. Your perception of | being beyond repair depends where on the roller coaster you | are. | at_a_remove wrote: | Well, there's the _estimated_ work to fix and then there 's how | ... "valauble" someone is. It's an invisible measure: a little | bit of celebrity (or how many people know you), some kind of | reputational Whuffie (will they be missed?), a dash of | disregard for age("he was so young" versus "it was his time"), | some men versus women as kind of a global score, then you have | individual removal. As an example, were Taylor Swift were | pursued by the black dog, wallets would open up for suicide | prevention, but some loathed yet similarly known figure not so | much. | | Whatever it is, the never-to-be-acknowledged issue that for | many, people "care" to an extent that is materially | indistinguishable from not caring one bit. Most people give | advice with no skin in the game and no penalties for being | wrong. Who wants to face the question, "What if it _didn 't_ | get better?" What if you convince some miserable twenty- | something that it gets better, as the platitude goes, and some | fifty years later, no, it didn't, that their life was one | terrible slog through stone-faced despair, lest we "affect | loved ones" via the taboo of picking the time we board the | train to Endsville? Whoops, sorry about that, we guilted you | into suffering for half a century so we wouldn't have to look | at you. Someone who would have done a Richard Cory instead ends | up like _Giles_ Corey, and it was just one more weight on the | plank crushing them down, but gosh we feel good about saying | the right thing. | Damogran6 wrote: | You're not a bad person for thinking it, there's a surprising | about of nuance in the handling of life, things like "mom's | suffering brings us no comfort" and then mom's long term | hospital stay is reduced when she dies quietly in her sleep. | | But nobody seems to discuss it. | IggleSniggle wrote: | Well, then, thank you both for discussing it! | | I, for one, would like to normalize what is often called | "dying with dignity" but could also be described simply as | "intentionally dying." It's not suicide in the traditional | sense, it's choosing your end of life with the same sort of | assertiveness that most of us wish to have in all the other | aspects of our lives. I understand why it's difficult. I | still think we should be able to be in control of our own | termination sequence when many of our subsystems are already | doing so of their own accord. | csomar wrote: | That's not how it works in real life. Family (and maybe | generous government healthcare) will take care of "too broke" | to give any yield, in the future, people. Anyone else who isn't | lucky to have that kind of support will find himself in the | streets. | | And that's fine. Societies can only function if the yield from | the people it invested in is higher than the investment. This | is why socialized healthcare is tricky. If you invest too much, | you might be wasting resources and endangering all of your | society. If you invest too little, you might be leaving people | who would otherwise be productive once the investment is made. | | > Are some simply too broken to fix? | | There is no one too broken to fix but how compatible people are | with their environments. A duck will leave its baby if it | thinks it can't cross the river. Its brothers did cross, and | thus it has to go forward, carry on and leave the weak behind. | On the other hand, if the duck was living in your backyard and | eating from your food; it would not have to do such a difficult | choice. Its baby will not need to cross any river and thus | it'll keep taking care of it. | | > I feel awful thinking this, but I wonder if there is some | truth to it. | | It's life. Netflix has great series (Planet Earth) that you can | watch. We are not really different from animals, we just happen | to live in a different environment. | totetsu wrote: | So socialized health care spending millions on a mentally | disabled child who will never yield return on that investment | is a danger to society? | carabiner wrote: | Many people say this of those who have borderline personality | disorder. BPD is the top result when you google "most painful | mental illness," and some therapists either refuse to treat or | limit their exposure to these patients. And so their imagined | fear of abandonment becomes real, and their illness worsens. | jareklupinski wrote: | in a perfect world, i believe there is a happy and fulfilling | lifestyle we can carve out for anyone in a well-functioning | society, no matter where they come from or where they're going | | we just need the space / time / resources to supply all those | different lifestyles that swing outside the mean, and a moral | code that allows for them all to exist on the same planet | | or just more planets... | amelius wrote: | Philosophical questions are fine here, I think. | sandgiant wrote: | I don't think there is such a thing as broken beyond repair. | How would you even begin defining that? If you're thinking in | economic terms then sure, we can try to optimize a limited | budget to save/improve the maximum number of lives. It would | still be beneficial to have at least a few people look into | whether new methods can be developed to increase the amount of | "good life" you get per dollar. Giving up and deciding | something is beyond repair can be one course of action in this | optimization, but it seems counter productive, and perhaps a | bit unethical, to try and generalize this position. Having the | thought, and the discussion, is obviously totally fine. | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote: | Often it isn't that things are too broken to be fixed, it's | just that no one cares to expend the resources to fix them. I | think people are like that. | podgaj wrote: | It is not that we are too broken to fix, people are just afraid | of us because we reveal the fragility of the mental state. And | people are just greedy as well. | | I do not ask for much help, all I need a simple place to live. | A studio or something that is clean. That would help me so | much. But all they build now are luxury studio apartments. Most | of us would be fine with some stability. For the more serious | cases we should bring back the institutions that they | dismantled in the 70's. | SkyPuncher wrote: | > Are people like this? Are some simply too broken to fix? I | feel awful thinking this, but I wonder if there is some truth | to it. | | In the criminal justice system, this is essentially what | pleading insanity recognizes. Many of these people are placed | in long term mental-health institutions. | moosey wrote: | When you say "fixed", I assume you mean that the traumatized | brain is returned to a state where a person can learn and | experience positive emotions. In most cases, I would argue that | it's probable, yes, but I'm not an expert in this area, though | I spend a lot of time trying to understand abuse (to remove it | from my own language and actions) and trauma (so that I can | help my children recover from it). | | It is my very slightly educated opinion that given a place of | psychological, emotional, and physical safety, it is possible | to train a person to gain resilience. I will also say that | places that meet these criteria are rare in the United States, | at a minimum. Our society is highly competitive and attacks | people who do poorly, even though that's largely assigned at | random, or is based on already existing/trained resilience, | which is not well taught in most schools in the US, at least | not to the extent that it needs to be. Emotional intelligence | is the primary toolkit for dealing with these kinds of issues, | and it can't just be taught as a one-and-done. It is something | that requires constant practice, similar to sports or music | preparation. | | I would even go as far as to suggest that the entire media | system, for all that it does well, strongly encourages | reductions in emotional intelligence. Advertising is designed | to get us to relate to emotions like pride (buy a brand new | vehicle to be your own person!) or fear. Facebook pushes anger | at us regularly. The fundamental attribution error is so rife | and abusive in our society that now we identify ourselves | almost completely via the categories and labels that are tossed | around so lazily, inducing category error, outgroup bias, and a | whole slew of cognitive errors that reduce emotional regulation | and empathy, key tools in maintaining a healthy mental state. | | Given all this working against us, on the other side there | needs to be understanding that safety isn't enough. Abusive | language is incredibly common in the US (I don't have insight | to what the media really looks like in most of Europe, or | Asia). There are positive actions that can be taken to help | people around you to heal, and to heal your own mind if you are | concerned about hieghtened anxiety or depression, but they | probably require counseling (hard to access and expensive), | meditation and or pharmacology. | | I would recommend understanding NVC (Non-violent communication) | as a strictly non-abusive method of communicating with others, | understanding abusive language patterns (name-calling, | dismissing, condescension, etc.) which are easily found online, | and also reading books like "Trauma and young children: | Teaching Strategies to support and empower" by the NAEYC. The | understanding of trauma, how subjective it is, and how often it | is associated with thinking patterns and how to modify them, is | key in helping people recover from trauma. | | As a side note: I have had to do a lot of counseling because | the 750k dead in the US from Covid caused me a lot of secondary | trauma. I have a tendency to think in the empathetic, and | updating from empathy to compassion freed up a lot of room for | new ways of thinking. However, I have access to the necessary | health care. People who are under intense pressure (month-to- | month pay, homelessness, bullying, etc.) will not be | experiencing what is called "toxic stress", which alters the | brain and practically eliminates the ability to build good | connections in the prefrontal cortex. | | I guess what I'm saying is it can be done, if we reorganize | society for mental health, or if you have the money. | tcbawo wrote: | In my town was a single mother who lived with her adult son | that struggled with mental issues. She probably had very little | help through the years, but somehow managed. One day, her son | murdered her with a knife. It's very sad, but I think we | generally leave people to fend for themselves when they have | dependents with mental issues. I worry about disturbed | individuals that target, stalk, or kill other innocent people. | Maybe some day we might have a more humane treatment for these | 'unfixable' individuals. Maybe even a virtual/persistent | metaverse where they can live out a satisfying life without | putting others in danger. | frgtpsswrdlame wrote: | The man in this article was broken, what would it have cost to | fix him? | | We don't have the information you're assuming we do, whether | the costs are monetary or otherwise there is no estimate for | what it would have cost to fix the daddy in this story. | micromacrofoot wrote: | There's an oft-used Lord of the Rings quote: | | "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. | Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out | death in judgement." | | What is a broken person? since we're all fallible beings | ourselves, who could possibly decide that someone is broken | beyond repair? It doesn't matter if there's truth to it. | anonporridge wrote: | I think this is a bit of the wrong analogy. | | There's a big difference between judging someone unworthy of | life and acting to kill them, and judging that someone is not | worth the energy and struggle to fight against their own | drive to throw themselves off a cliff. | | We're not collectively strong enough to save everyone. | Getting strong enough is a goal to aspire to, but the dark | reality is that in our state of weakness, we need to | prioritize what we struggle to hold onto. | SigmundA wrote: | Never heard of "put them out of their misery"? | | Not acting and letting them destroy themselves can be worse | in many ways to them and others around them rather than | "acting to kill them". | | This is a hard truth, I am not advocated mercy killings but | doing nothing to help them can be worse in many than doing | something for all involved, which is why most advocate for | doing something to help even is it seem futile, sometimes | its as much for everyone else than the person receiving | help. | anonporridge wrote: | I think it really depends. | | Ultimately there's a never ending ethical conversation of | when or if one ever has a duty to act to help others. I'm | inclined to be believe there's a lot of cases where you | ethically do have a duty to act, but we're not going to | resolve the debate of where that line is here. | | But there does exist a practical limitations to what you | can do to save someone. A key rule of any kind of | emergency response is to always prioritize your own | safety first, because if you don't you risk creating an | additional victim and making the situation worse for | everyone. That can be an incredibly hard thing to accept | when you see someone suffering and dying, but it's the | truth. | | If you jump in the water to save a drowning person, | there's a high chance in their panic, they drag you down | and you both drown. | csunbird wrote: | I always remember this phrase, from Harry Potter, when | thinking about death: | | "You are the true master of death, because the true | master does not seek to run away from Death. He accepts | that he must die, and understands that there are far, far | worse things in the living world than dying." | | A little bit pessimistic, but lifelong suffering might be | worser than dying outright. | agumonkey wrote: | I think societies had a simple curve for this. They help, | help a bit more.. but after some time they drop the ball. | Most average people have no clue anyway so they are | powerless about the whole thing. People who know more may | be able to go further in their efforts, but even then | you're never sure you can carry someone like that for long. | Even though .. I dearly think that most suicidal people | only need a root deep emotional connection. Way too often | people respond to shared pain, real empathy, understanding, | trust .. | rubyist5eva wrote: | As someone that was on medication that made me think about | comitting suicide regularly, and I've learned to cope and | overcome it somewhat...I thought I could read this...but this was | like stepping into another reality where I was gone and this was | about me. :S :S. and now I'm sitting at my desk bawling my eyes | out...just wanting to hold my son and never let him go. | muuglay wrote: | Suicide is a hard topic. My mom did it. I don't talk to my | father. I might be autistic or have aspbergers, and I dont | understand why I wake up. I'm a robot emulating a human. I have | to do weed to grt any mystery of a cosmic connection because we | are strange primates. I hate my job which causes a disease of | more when even after excelling in a fang job making over seven | figures, I feel very little joy. I just have hope that something | will change. I'm going to retire soon. I hope I can find joy. | agumonkey wrote: | Allocate some time to joy seeking. I think I'm a bit on the | autistic spectrum... at least I struggled for a very long time | with human connections, and it changes a lot about how one sees | life. | | The analytical part of the brain is not the only one.. that | said, I'm neuroscientist, just a dude with a strange | upbringing. | vorpalhex wrote: | Talk to a therapist, and if that therapist isn't giving you | what you need then try another one. If you are shy about | therapists, there are some programs that let you do therapy via | text message or video call. | | There are a lot of possible causes as to why you may feel a | lack of joy. The good news is that the vast majority of those | causes are fixable. | mikeflynn wrote: | If you aren't already working with a therapist, I would | encourage you to do so. I think it would really help, but | either way I hope you find what you're looking for. | outworlder wrote: | There is some research that seems to point out to genetic | factors. My only experience with this subject seems to | corroborate this, but it's anecdotal. This is true for some | other mental health issues too. TL;DR I'd be very careful if | there's any history in the family, as in your case. | | Given that you suspect that you are neurodivergent(you | mentioned autism), please talk to a professional. Maybe | figuring out exactly what makes you tick is what you need - or | maybe there's something that's preventing you from feeling | 'joy' (anhedonia is a classic depression sign). | | Don't wait until retirement. You can certainly afford talking | to a therapist (from a monetary perspective at least, time may | be another matter). But just do it. | | I think that 'joy' is a target that can't be reached. No matter | how wonderful one's life become, we'll adapt. Joy is fleeting | (but you should still experience some occasionally). Not hating | having to wake up is a good first goal though. I'm also working | on that part. | ellyagg wrote: | Statistics also suggest that, singularly among illnesses, people | with schizophrenia fare better in the developing world, where the | rates of remission are higher. | | It's because developing countries are low-compliance societies. | Humans weren't evolved to live in high-compliance societies and a | lot of us don't care for it at all. Some of us get by. Others | don't. | valenaut wrote: | What do you mean by high/low compliance? | jarito wrote: | Not the OP, but I assume they mean the requirement by society | on how well individuals conform to the expectations of that | society. In high compliance societies, individuals are | ostracized / punished for non-conformance - think atheists in | a religious society. In low conformance societies, | individuals are able to maintain a high level of privacy or | society is more tolerant of divergence. | AdamN wrote: | Meaning it's more acceptable to not comply with cultural | standards: i.e. keep standard hours, have a job, not | marry/have kids, or whatever else the standards of behavior | are. | | I'm not convinced though that developing countries are | actually lower compliance but that's what the OP means. | topspin wrote: | > I'm not convinced though that developing countries are | actually lower compliance | | They aren't, and there is far less opportunity to escape | compliance. Deviation is an exclusive privilege of the | prevailing strong men. Everyone else tows the community | line and occupies their time scrutinizing precisely how | well others are towing it as well. The romantic fiction | that there is some great liberty in such places is a form | of noble savage fantasy that emerges among those that have | fully inculcated the contempt for their own culture they | were trained to have. | watwut wrote: | It heavily depends on what exactly are you supposed to be | compliant with. As in, developing countries tend to be less | organized with all kind of rules being broken routinely. | With people used to dysfunction, bad service, | disorganization, bad behavior. | | In a lot of ways, it is more tolerant of faults, because | developed word demands perfection. | | But then, when it turns bad it can be really bad. And it is | not tolerant of everything, many freedoms and choices | acceptable in developed word are treated with massive | hostility. | gowld wrote: | I've also read that schizophrenia is much less painful in | countries where cultural/religious context lead people to | interpret the hallunications as friendly spirits, and not | government spies using mind control tech. | | The way someone experiences schizophrenia may be a reflection | of their overall societal mental health, and how fearful | society is in general. | [deleted] | foogazi wrote: | I've had friends tell me that they wouldn't move to the US | because everything it's too rigid or strict, there are no ways | out - think HOAs with street cameras strict | | They like living in a developing country that allows more lax | behavior- throw a loud party and the cops don't care, no one | will sue you either, you can get by without a credit score or | just grease some palms to get stuff done | | Edit: imagine no IRS, or wage garnishment for debts, no zoning, | OSHA, ADA - basically the state having little power to make you | comply | | More flexibility as the system doesn't form your behavior - | although at the same time it can come down hard on you if it | wants | | Your rights won't mean much though | vajrabum wrote: | That's an assumption I'd say. Another completely different | possibility is that people suffering from schizophrenia in the | developing world are generally not medicated. Anti-psychotic | medications have nasty side effects and perhaps one | undiscovered side effect is to turn a chronic relapsing disease | into a permanent condition. | NikolaNovak wrote: | It's a difficult read; more of a personal/lived experience but | with some stats and thoughts sprinkled through. | | I have two young'uns (3 years and 6 months), so it was the title | and its expansion that got to me the most; telling your kids that | their parent is not coming back? I struggle to tell them when | mommy is out for a grocery run! I told the | children early on Saturday morning. "Daddy isn't coming back," I | said as we lay curled into each other in bed. "He didn't want to | live any more and he made himself die." | aerovistae wrote: | Not a comment on the story itself, but rather on the postscript | which follows it: | | > If you are struggling to cope or have been affected by anything | in this story, please contact the Samaritans in the UK at 116 123 | or jo@samaritans.org. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention | Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255. More information at mind.org.uk, | samaritans.org and save.org | | Years ago, unhappy but not suicidal, I decided to call a suicide | hotline. I did this for the same reason we have fire drills and | software tests - I was verifying whether it would work if I did | need it. | | It did not work. I was quite disappointed. After my experience, I | would never suggest to anyone to call a suicide hotline, and I | realized that most people who recommend them probably have never | used one and don't know what they're recommending. | | The individual I spoke to asked if I was suicidal - I said I | wasn't at the moment, but then that doesn't mean much, does it? | _I'm still calling, regardless of what I say._ I would imagine a | lot of people who call suicide hotlines might not be entirely | honest about the urgency or seriousness of their emotional state. | Their reaction was dismissive thereafter. | | The person would not make any connection with me - they are | clearly trained not to do that to avoid certain problems, but I | feel that in a moment where what a person needs most is a | connection and is calling to try to seek one out, the total | refusal to answer any questions at all or be personable in any | way was like having a door shut in my face. The individual | continually turned the conversation back to a set of formulaic | questions that were of no help whatsoever, and I ultimately | disconnected feeling worse than when I'd initially called. | | I do wonder if my experience is representative of the norm or | not. | gowld wrote: | A suicide hotline is not a general mental health therapy. It | was one function -- to prevent the caller from committing | suicide in the immediate future. It was successful. | | You can't test the effectiveness of a suicide prevention with a | dry run. Fire drills don't put out fires either. | | Also, you essentially admityed that you were making a false | call. That's not going to get a great reply. You shouldn't call | 911 to test response time either. | vlunkr wrote: | Exactly, and I'm sure they want to keep their lines open for | the real emergencies. | aerovistae wrote: | My point is that it can be hard to tell a real emergency | from a non-real one. Not everyone is going to be sobbing | and shouting. Some may sound calm and alright. If you've | known someone who committed suicide, you probably know that | there isn't always a flashing warning sign the day of. | There is sometimes, but it's not reliable. I think it's | important for a hotline to treat all calls equally. | mjevans wrote: | My impression differs. | | The caller left the experience feeling more disheartened and | unsupported. Logically that seems like they were at an | _increased risk of suicide_ relative to when they called. | watwut wrote: | He literally answered "no, I am not suicidal" to the "are | you suicidal" question. And in fact, he did not became | suicidal after. | | This was not failure of suicide hotline. This was them | recognizing he is misusing the service. | agumonkey wrote: | Called an emergency line after hallucination episode. Woman | meant well but was very limited in her suggestions and empathy. | | I don't blame them though. That said whether or not they're | optimal.. it's often a good last resort option. Many people | might have avoided tragedy through some mild listening. I've | seen it happen on other venues. | | [0] To be fair.. most psychology professional I ran into were | far from perfect. | have_faith wrote: | Is your advice based on this single interaction? | aerovistae wrote: | Well, I have two options going forward: | | 1. Despite my bad experience, recommend suicide hotlines in | the hopes that they work even though they didn't for me. | | 2. Recommend against suicide hotlines while explaining why | and cautioning that my experience may or may not be | representative of the norm. | | I'm going with #2 for the time being, yes. | mitigating wrote: | Recommending against anything because it didn't work for | you isn't good, even with the disclaimer. Antidotal | evidence is the worst. | ebb-tide wrote: | 3. Not post about something you have scant evidence one way | or another about. | AutumnCurtain wrote: | 3. Collect more meaningful data before offering | recommendations? | wpietri wrote: | You really can't think of any other options? | [deleted] | ccvannorman wrote: | Why do you feel recommending anything at all is required? | | 3. Share my experience, acknowledge this is a single data | point, and withhold recommendation. | aerovistae wrote: | This is a good point, and phrased better and more openly | than the other replies. | paxys wrote: | A single hotline experience not working for you doesn't warrant | a blanket "I would never suggest to anyone to call a suicide | hotline". | | There are lots of studies that show that such programs are at | least moderately effective (https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral | .com/articles/10.1186/s12...) | thelettere wrote: | Look at the methodology - borderline laughable. Tells us no | more than his anecdote does, for there are a million other | potential explanations - including that it isn't calling | those hotlines that helps, but knowing that one can, which | dovetails nicely with research on the benefits of friendship. | Some things you simply can't test. | dogleash wrote: | >I do wonder if my experience is representative of the norm or | not. | | When you need help, you find out pretty quickly that | institutional support is like bumpers in a bowling alley gutter | - it's crude and manufactured. It might keep you on the lane, | it sure doesn't help you bowl any better. You also find out | that even well-intentioned people aren't much better. | | I don't really know how to expand without sounding like a | depressed person stuck in that self-pittying state where any | and all actions - internal or external - towards normalcy are | futile. I don't think that, but there's a mental disconnection | that prevents a connection from working. For some people, it | might even require talking to someone in a similar headspace | just to get on the same page and start talking for real. I've | found out I helped people after the fact, and I know that if I | was playing defense I'd probably would have been too scared to | say the things I did. | | Anyway, here's a nice article, the first half of which explains | that personality mismatch better than I ever could: | https://eggreport.medium.com/envying-the-dead-skyking-in-mem... | ebb-tide wrote: | I used to work at a hotline, and OF COURSE the 'quality' of the | volunteer varied. We were not trained to avoid anything, we | were there to stay on the line as long as people wanted, and | talk about whatever people needed unless there were more calls | than we could handle. Many people called who were in crisis, | rather than overtly suicidal, we were there for them. | AmericanChopper wrote: | I can't stand articles that start with "we need to talk | about...". What the author is really saying is "This topic is | important to me, and I'd like to pressure you into having the | same views on it as I do". Regardless of the merit of those | views, the only thing that ever comes after "we need to talk | about..." is a description of some hardship the author (or | somebody the author knows) faced, an explanation of how that | shaped the agenda they're trying to promote, and some appeal to | emotion suggesting that their views are the only valid views a | person can hold. | huitzitziltzin wrote: | That's a pretty harsh view. | | Let me try something else: the author notes that 6,000 people | take their lives in the UK every year. That has a very | substantial cost, potentially measurable in many ways, but | let's measure it in dollars. | | The US EPA uses a value of about 7 million dollars for a | statistical life in 2006 dollars [1], or about 10 million 2021 | dollars [2]. | | The cost of suicide in the UK in the aggregate is something | like 6,000*10,000,000 dollars. That's a 60 billion dollar | problem. | | Nearly every 60 billion dollar problem is worth caring about. | Hypothetically, if you could spend $10 billion dollars to | prevent all of those suicides, you would be generating a $50 | billion dollar gain. | | It's worth at least asking of a "we need to talk about..." | article how big the problem is (on some dimension, whether in | dollars or otherwise). This one is quite large. | | [1] https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/mortality- | risk-v... [2] https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm | muuglay wrote: | I'm not sure the 10 mil per life is correct. As a counter | point value, a highway worker is $10,000. | woofcat wrote: | >Suppose each person in a sample of 100,000 people were asked | how much he or she would be willing to pay for a reduction in | their individual risk of dying of 1 in 100,000, or 0.001%, | over the next year. Since this reduction in risk would mean | that we would expect one fewer death among the sample of | 100,000 people over the next year on average, this is | sometimes described as "one statistical life saved." Now | suppose that the average response to this hypothetical | question was $100. Then the total dollar amount that the | group would be willing to pay to save one statistical life in | a year would be $100 per person x 100,000 people, or $10 | million. This is what is meant by the "value of a statistical | life." Importantly, this is not an estimate of how much money | any single individual or group would be willing to pay to | prevent the certain death of any particular person. | | I think it's important to note that the value of a | statistical life has nothing to do with actual value, or | money provided into an economy. So it's not something that | can be taxed against etc. So to me it's false statement to | say "spend $10 billion dollars to prevent all of those | suicides, you would be generating a $50 billion dollar gain." | there is no _actual_ dollar gain. The gain is that the | average mortality goes down by 0.001%. | wasteofelectron wrote: | This is an account of a woman's husband and the father of her | children being severely ill and dying by suicide, not "some | hardship" or a "topic". Have some respect for goodness sake. | You never know when you'll need someone to do the same for you. | wpietri wrote: | The author didn't even write that. The subhed is typically | written by an editor. So in addition to being grossly | uncharitable, I believe your anger is directed at the wrong | person. | AmericanChopper wrote: | I really don't think it's grossly uncharitable at all. The | details of the editorial process aren't especially relevant, | the article itself is some grim anecdote being used to | promote a policy agenda. Regardless of the merit of the | position being promoted, it's intentionally emotionally | manipulative, it's anti-rational and anti-intellectual. It's | also entirely based upon the presupposition that the problem | they're talking about only has one cause, and one possible | solution. Framing issues in this way means that any criticism | of the presuppositions of, or conclusions draw by the author, | is likely to be seen as disparagement of a clearly | sympathetic person. It's not a rational way to discuss a | problem, and it's incredibly low quality journalism. | jstx1 wrote: | Knowing that you're at high risk of suicide or have other serious | mental health problems is also a good reason to avoid having | kids. This isn't directed at the author of the article or their | partner; it's how I think when I plan my own life. | micromacrofoot wrote: | There are a lot of mental health issues that make this level of | self-awareness and future planning incredibly difficult. | anonporridge wrote: | Perhaps a good reason to keep elevating the socially approved | age to reproduce? | | By the time you're in your 40s, you likely have a good idea | of whether or not you're a stable enough mind to commit to | the minimum 20 years required to uplift a new human adult. | selectodude wrote: | The body has a clock that's not really compatible with | that. | saghm wrote: | I'd suggest looking up fertility rates for women based on | age; it' quite difficult for a woman to get pregnant that | late in life, and for some women it might not be possible | at all. | anonporridge wrote: | That's a technical problem that will improve with time | and has been actively improving for decades. | | It also won't be long before we have artificial wombs and | can create embryos more expressively than the current 1 | male 1 female demands of nature. | | I see a future where one waits even several hundred years | and dozens of careers and lifestyles before choosing to | combine their genes and memes with others to spawn and | raise a new consciousness, maybe even committing to a | hundred years to raise it. | pengaru wrote: | It's historically somewhat common for older, more | established and financially secure men to pair up with | young women. | | It does seem like a good practical/pragmatic approach to | raising a family. | watwut wrote: | The 40 years old man marrying young girl were business | transactions. | | The normal coupling differences were much smaller | typically. (Like 6 years or something). | saghm wrote: | Women are still people who can have mental health issues; | the solution of "just waiting until you're 40" isn't | viable for 50% of the population. | muuglay wrote: | Not sure our biology is great at that, but paradoxically as | an almost 40 year old... I have the resources to support a | bunch of children. Maybe the change to make is change the | dynamic between men and women to introduce more age | differences for child rearing. | | My parents fought about money all the time, but if they had | delayed then they would have been better off. If they were | better off then maybe my mom wouldn't have killed | herself... | anonporridge wrote: | While I agree with you technically, there's something | icky about a community full of older, wealthy men talking | about how maybe it's actually ideal for older, wealthy | men to wife up young, fertile women. | watwut wrote: | People on their 20 ties are more energetic and better | handle sleep deprivation that comes with kids. Kids are | not just costing money, they cost energy and effort. | [deleted] | crocodiletears wrote: | I would think that there'd be a threshold where the | elevated risk of birth defects would place a ceiling on how | old parents should be. | | 25-35 seems to be the ideal window, where the parents have | had ample opportunity to get to know themselves as | individuals, and the risks of a severe disability aren't | particularly elevated. Afterwards, the risk seems to climb | very quickly. | | https://www.med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2018/10/older- | fat... https://www.ivf1.com/age-birth-defects/ | [deleted] | [deleted] | [deleted] | Ozzie_osman wrote: | Also social pressure and expectations. How many people would | feel comfortable saying "Sorry mom/dad/friend/potential | partner, I'm not going to have kids because I'm worried I | might not be a good parent or maybe even take my own life"? | cyberpunk wrote: | No one is ever ready to become a parent. I mean, "we" (I | assume we're all in relatively stable, high paying, high | demand, low risk jobs) certainly are much better placed to | be them than say, my parents were... But nothing prepares | you for the abject horror of your entire way of life ending | in such a dramatic way. I mean... It was worth it, I kinda | like the wee guy.. But it's BRUTAL at the start. | | Doesn't help that all your mrs's intsa-friends are posting | bollocks about how great everything is while you've been | trying to get your newborn out for a walk for 5 hours and | failed.. heh. | | Don't overthink that stuff though.. I mean, you kinda know | deep down if you've got it in you or not. It's kinda like | having a puppy times a million.. | nonbirithm wrote: | It isn't just about pressure. I've told people things like | this while not caring about the stigma and it has always | negatively affected the relationship, because I'm perceived | as acting too vulnerable too soon. As a result, none of my | friendships have advanced past a superficial level. | | From my experience, it seems there is a good reason for the | stigma. Depressed people with pessimistic worldviews don't | make good friends. The worst time for me to make friends is | when I need other people the most (such as when I'm | depressed), but when I don't need people my interest in | them becomes almost nil. | | Also, I highly empathize with the idea that when the fear | of failure can be linked to the risk of one's life | spiraling out of control potentially all the way to | suicide, whether or not those consequences logically | follow, it takes away a lot of options that might sound | common-sense to someone of a healthy mind (aiming for | challenging side projects, putting yourself in front of | others). For such people, I believe shielding yourself from | those signals is a valid option for survival, even if it | means having to deceive yourself temporarily. | hh3k0 wrote: | You could simply state that you've lived with depression | your entire life and that it's not something you'd wish for | your offspring to inherit... or something along those | lines. Just make sure to point out early that you're not | interested in kids, you can bring up your motivation for | that once you're comfortable enough to share it. | holdenk wrote: | My partner and I talked about our health (and mental | health) in the context of deciding if we wanted to be | parents to a kid. I like to think that's a normal enough | conversation to have. | decebalus1 wrote: | Not even mental health. If this level of self- | awareness/planning would be universal, we'd reach complete | societal collapse within 3 generations. | jandrese wrote: | Isn't this just the start of Idiocracy? | DyslexicAtheist wrote: | many people in that risk group aren't aware of these tendencies | (now there are words for it we did not have 30 years ago: | suicidal ideation) until their kids are ready to leave home. | Plenty of us around with families not knowing how to make it, | even we've felt healthy all along until some event (or | cascading events) changed everything. | skissane wrote: | I have a long history of suicidal thoughts, and I've even acted | on them a few times when I was younger (albeit half-heartedly- | if I'd been really serious about it I wouldn't be here now.) I | don't know if that makes me "at high risk of suicide" but | likely people like me are at greater risk than people who don't | have that history. | | And yet, having kids has actually made it _easier_ for me to | resist those thoughts. They haven't gone away completely, but I | feel more confident that I'm not going to act on them, and | their frequency and intensity has definitely declined as well. | Maybe I _could_ do that to my wife or family or friends, but I | could not do that to my own children. I think that, if there is | such a thing as hell-if I did that to them, I'd be going | straight there. | | Having children has given me a new and very compelling reason | to not kill myself. The best reason I've ever had. It also has | given me a new motivation to try to keep a lid on my own | "craziness", which I think has helped my mental health as well. | OTOH, it has also led to a lot of stress, and no doubt that | stress has aggravated some of my mental health issues. Still, I | think overall, the positive benefits of fatherhood on my own | mental health have outweighed the negatives. | | The only situation I can foresee myself now actually going | through with suicide, is if both our kids died (say in a car | accident), or if I'm terminally ill and trying to hurry along | the inevitable. Outside of those two scenarios, I'm definitely | not doing it. I don't think I could have been so firm about | that before having children. | cyberpunk wrote: | Yep. I'm with you. I was chaos and anarchy before becoming a | parent. Now if I lost mine in such an accident say, I'd | immediately do it. What would be the point of waiting? | | Not because they were the only thing stopping me, but because | life without them, by now, is incomprehensible. | | To be honest though, I think suicide is probably the best way | to go unless you die instantly. I mean, say I get diagnosed | with some horrible cancer or other. My son is 3, he would | only remember me as some kind of horrible pale monster in a | hospital if I went with the treatments.. TBH, in such a | situation, I'd probably just wait until I was so sick I was | unable to function, somehow attempt to say goodbye, write a | ridiculous amount of letters to him and head off to the local | euthanasia clinic.. I'm sure I read somewhere a majority of | doctors who get cancer don't accept chemo/etc.. But I have no | links to back that up. | | Wow! Sunshine and rainbows. | bladegash wrote: | As someone who has watched their parent struggle with - and | ultimately pass away from - lung cancer, I can say that in | my case the memory of them was far from their last days. I | still remember them as my dad, the way you do when you're a | kid. The person that is a superhero and strongest person | there is/was. FWIW, my dad passed away at home under | hospice care, with me there to care for him for the last | few days. It was difficult and not easy to see him that | way, but I am thankful to have been able to be there for | him in his final moments, especially since he'd been there | for me my entire life. | cyberpunk wrote: | I've still got both ahead, I guess I was a bit cocksure | about how I would deal with it.. It's a tricky line to | find for me between 'letting my kid watch me slowly die' | or err.. not.. | | This is a ridiculously personal question and just ignore | it if not, but it's something I've had in my mind for a | while... If your pop had taken the cyberpunk route, and | just pissed off during those last 2 months, would you | have felt him selfish or do you think you could | understand? | rekado wrote: | > I'm sure I read somewhere a majority of doctors who get | cancer don't accept chemo/etc.. But I have no links to back | that up. | | Perhaps you mean this one: | https://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2011/11/30/how-doctors- | di... | krumpet wrote: | Alzheimers reduced my father to a lost shell of his former | self, but I wouldn't trade any day I ever spent with him | for anything. Regardless of the state he was in at the end, | he was still my father and I loved every moment we had | together. He was the gentlest, kindest, strongest and most | thoughtful man I ever knew and that's exactly how I | remember him. That's just my own opinion. | kreeben wrote: | I hear myself in you. I went through some shit. But I have | two kids and I would never... | | Then I got a little better and those daily thoughts became | weekly, then monthly and nowadays they are simply not there | anymore. Well, sometimes they are but they are now very | easily dismissed. | | I just came here to say that, if god forbid both your kids | are taken from you, even then, I would say to you, fucking | hell man, don't do it. Your loss will crush you and you'll | never be the same. But you'd be alive. And you'd get to see | how you'd deal with such a loss. And you wouldn't be alone. | Because this shit happens to people and with some support, | they live through it. | | Anyways, I'm glad you find such joy in being a father. Isn't | it great? | cyberpunk wrote: | I mean, I'm a buddhist.. So I'm kind of 'pro universe' but | I don't see the point in unnecessary suffering. You're | telling me you'd keep on going after losing your family? | Years and years of pain and misery? What's the point? There | are some things you don't get over.. And even the idea of | 'getting over' something like that would make me even | sadder than I would have been immediately? | | Sometimes, kill -9 seems to be a valid option to me, all | I'm saying.. (In a responsible way, get your stuff in | order, do it in a clinic, etc etc etc) | xenocratus wrote: | I took the parent comment's point to be not (just) that you | could be at risk of slipping back into suicidal thoughts and | acting on them, but that this might have genetic causes and | you could end up passing these tendencies to your children. | At least, I know I've thought/worried about this quite a lot. | sen wrote: | Same here, I agree and relate to every bit you said. I always | thought it'd be a bad idea for me to have kids, my | childhood/early-adulthood was absolute chaos, abuse, serious | depression, homelessness, the works. Met "the one", we wanted | kids, a decade later I can see it's the best thing that ever | happened to me. My brain can still be a very scary place, but | they give me purpose/direction/motivation to do better and | make sure they don't grow up how I did. | | I do now have an illness that's "almost definitely terminal" | (but haven't been given a definitive timeframe yet), and old- | me would've just ended it to get it over with without a | second thought, but instead now I'm driven to make sure my | wife/kids have the best possible life set up before I go. | downut wrote: | I have never been suicidal. I do know, having been through a | months long Stage IV cancer watch, which provides a solid view | of the terminal medical industrial complex experience. I'll | efficiently terminate myself before embarking on that way to | go. | | That said, I have never understood why people think that having | kids has no effect on your mental health. When we had our | child, I thought nothing of it; I was in a partnership and | that's what the partner wanted. However, after the year or so | larval stage, we began to realize that the experience of having | a kid, steadily growing, seeing the world through changing | eyes, different from your own: it made us different people. I | wouldn't have missed the experience for the world, even if the | terrible twos do happen and the teen years can be a trial. | | It gave us a sense of purpose within our own lives. The very | opposite of a screen or a job or a bucket list! We're very | different people from the weird/sad, entering their 60s | childless couples we know, every single one. I'll be kind and | say they seem mostly ruled by a flat emotional narcissism | that's... pretty damn boring. I won't say that that never | happens to empty nesters; it does. But the childless couples | all seem a bit off. | | I wouldn't have a kid with the idea that it would _solve_ any | mental health problems I might have, just as having a kid seems | to never solve any couple 's relationship problems. I just | point out that your mental health is going to _change_ with a | kid, and I 'd not rule out for the better. | | Even with those caveats, we've watched a lot of children | survive divorce, some ugly. Many of those kids turned out | superlatively, and for quite a few the divorce seemed to be a | kind of positive stimulus. Not recommending divorce! Same with | the death of a parent. Children can be incredibly resilient. | It's not always about you, is the lesson. A child has a world | that is bigger than the parents. | podgaj wrote: | I have schizoaffective bipolar disorder, and aspergers. I was | making $130,000 a year as a network engineer at Cisco in 1999 | before I became too sick to work anymore. Right now I am homeless | living in my van with a transmission about to go. I have | attempted suicide three times already. I keep thinking about | doing it again. No one wants to provide me the best medicine, | stable housing. I make $1700 on disability but I can never save | enough for a deposit. So what is the point. The fact that I | cannot get housing just proves no one cares. | | And through all this I keep up my research on my familial | disease, pressuring doctors to at least do some tests. I am | pretty sure, looking at my genetics, I actually have a | mitochondrial disorder. This is an easy test, but they will never | do it. They just keep focusing on the same old pathways and that | is why there is no progress. | | The medications? They do nothing but make me worse. They usually | give me drug induced lupus or just make me more suicidal the next | day. The only one I can rely on is Klonopin, it works great but I | do not take it everyday adn I only take a very low dose, the | lowest that works. And every time I get a new doctor I face the | stigma of being a drug seeker. Luckily, that is not so much of a | problem anymore. | | Now iwth COVID, everyone thinks they haev a mood disoder but in | reality it is just situational, but they take up all the | appointments so now mine are getting pushed further apart. | | My nephew hung himself at 14 years old after a doctor thought he | had ADHD and gave him ritalin. It was a misdiagnosis. | | If you do not have a serious mental illness you have no idea how | bad the treatments are and how they ignore any other issues you | have in your body. We are the garbage people in this age but we | probably used to be the shaman. | | So all I can do now is drink a bit to escape, its a great drugs, | an awesome calcium channel blocker. | | Oh well, that's enough of that. Just wanted to share. | winrid wrote: | Chevy van? Damn 4L60 transmissions suck. Sometimes it's just a | solenoid, and sometimes shifting it manually might get some | more life out of it. | | I hope you can get help. I have a few family members with | schizophrenia / bipolar disorder and the way society treats | them is like shit. | BurningFrog wrote: | > _The fact that I cannot get housing just proves no one | cares._ | | All it proves is that there is a big housing shortage. | | Have you tried taking your van somewhere where housing is dirt | cheap? | | I hear small poor towns are better at taking care of the | downtrodden too. Walk into the church poor people go to, and | see what happens. | jonny_eh wrote: | > All it proves is that there is a big housing shortage. | | Which is a symptom of people not caring. | podgaj wrote: | Housing shortage? Probably, but why? In a town I lived in for | a bit 50% of the houses were second houses, i would drive | around and see them all dark, sitting there empty. Her where | I am now, the housing has been moved over to AirBNB. It is | all greed. | | And go to a poor town? And not have healthcare, be away from | my friends and support? But yes, I have tried it. They ask me | what I do and when I say I am on disability they deny me the | rental. And many of these towns will not let you live in your | van while you are looking. | | It is inequality, not a shortage. | | I am telling you, you have no idea what it is like. | bettysdiagnose wrote: | You're right, he doesn't. The idea that somehow it is | sensible, when you're seriously ill, to just abandon your | entire support network for financial reasons makes next to | no sense whatsoever. Thank you for sharing your story and I | wish you all the best. | bettysdiagnose wrote: | Is there a website for compiling the "most vintage hackernews | (american/hyper-libertarian/indifferent-to-human-suffering) | comments"? Yours would be there. Simultaneously both | astoundingly callous and utterly lacking in empathy or | understanding. Bravo. | sandgiant wrote: | Thanks for sharing. Getting the right treatment is such a | gamble. I wish we were better at talking about mental illness | openly instead of stigmatizing it. Perhaps then we would | realize the need for better treatments and funding. I have a | close relative that's been all the way down the hole with life- | threatening mental illness, but recovered due to doctors | finding the right cocktail of medication and safe environment. | Getting to know this person I'm humbled by how ignorant I've | always been on issues of mental health. I shudder when I read | comment sections like this one, or talk to friends and family, | as I'm reminded how pervasive this ignorance still is in the | general public, and even in professional healthcare. I have the | deepest respect for people like you, that are hanging on in | spite of the terrible circumstances you've been given. I hope | you find some shivers of light in between all the darkness. | laurent92 wrote: | I hope my question won't wake up anything, and please accept my | apologies if they do. | | - What hopes did you have when you were younger? | | - What did it look like when you started failing? | | - Do you think a different turn of events would have avoided | that? | | I feel like I was on the high path up to 25 years old, I'm | earning now, but I'm getting inexorably rid of my friends, one | after another. I'd like to know where I'm at... | wpietri wrote: | Thanks for sharing this. I'm sorry that you've been so poorly | treated. You deserve better. Very many people do. | | I recently read Van Der Kolk's "The Body Keeps The Score", a | book about trauma and its effects. It's a masterwork, and I'll | be thinking about it for the next year. But one of the big | themes for me is the extent to which he, a well-placed | psychiatrist with a strong mix of clinical and research work, | had trouble getting the medical establishment to go beyond | outdated categories and marginally effective treatments. It's | heartbreaking to think of all the patients so poorly supported | by the existing system. | | It made me realize that as far as mental health goes, we're | living in an age that people will later look at with horror. It | makes me think of Semmelweis [1], who had the then-radical idea | that surgeons should wash their hands before cutting people | open. Many in the establishment mocked him. How dare he call | them dirty! He ended up being committed to an asylum where he | was beaten; he died 2 weeks later from a gangrenous wound. | Eventually people realized he was right, but too late for him. | And for who knows how many deaths. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis | SapporoChris wrote: | A difficult situation. I am impressed by your success at Cisco. | If you had that capability, you still have that capability.You | have significant hurdles to overcome, but you do have the | opportunity to make it. I won't offer you platitudes, but I | encourage you to keep trying. | gowld wrote: | > I actually have a mitochondrial disorder. | | If you do, what treatment options does that offer? Can you | pursue that treatment without an official diagnosis? | | https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/15612-mitocho... | | mentions no prescription-restricted treatments, just vitamins, | diet, exercise, and rest. It mentions therapy, but general | skills therapy, nothing specific to mitochondrial disease. | windock wrote: | I'm sorry to hear it is so bad. Thank you for sharing | sadmandeathsoon wrote: | The truth is no one cares about men. Death is the peace we will | get. | | Society expects us to be obedient tax cows. Women expect us to | breadbringers. | | Hillary Clinton once said:""" "Women have always been the primary | victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their | sons in combat. """ Unironically marginalizing the death of men. | | The existing social contract has failed men. It's better to die | fast than suffer a long humiliating and slow death. | chesterfield wrote: | http://web.archive.org/web/20211117073557/https://www.ft.com... | | https://archive.md/DvlP6 ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-11-17 23:00 UTC)