[HN Gopher] Latest Earthquakes ___________________________________________________________________ Latest Earthquakes Author : DyslexicAtheist Score : 38 points Date : 2021-12-08 20:21 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (earthquake.usgs.gov) (TXT) w3m dump (earthquake.usgs.gov) | doodlebugging wrote: | This is a continuation of fairly normal activity along that plate | boundary of the coast of Oregon. I have watched this whole area | for a long time just for grins. | | I have another map that may put some of it into perspective. | | https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=30.82678... | | That is a mouthful if you had to say it but it works out to be | the locations of every event with a magnitude greater than 4.5 | since Jan. 1, 2018 in the map area defined by the coordinates in | the link (basically bounded on the east by the Nevada border, on | the south by the California/Mexico border, on the north by the | northernmost quake in Idaho, and on the west by the plate | boundary where we see the new activity. | | Notice all the events along the California/Nevada border. Most of | those are related to the July 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake which | was a magnitude 7.1 event preceded about 34 hours earlier by a | magnitude 6.4. Since that event, the faulted zone from Ridgecrest | toward Mammoth Lakes and on to Carson City has seen increased | activity that propagates from south to north and that has | reactivated the east-west fault that runs east of Mono Lake into | Nevada. Over time, probably the next few years, you will likely | see similar quakes between Carson City and Medford, Oregon along | that zone. That appears to be the eastern end of the plunging | plate where we see the current quake swarm if you trace it out. | (The edge may be near Yreka/McDoel CA area in the Cedar Mtn Fault | System where the main faulting along the eastern Sierra/Cascades | takes a more northerly turn. | | Remember that the red squiggles are mapped faults and that they | are actually continuous in the subsurface along zones of faulting | that follows the general squiggle trend. | | The latest activity on the transform fault offshore just | continues that older trend (grey dots are events that have | happened since Jan 1, 2018 and that are more than a month old) | out to the western edge of that plate. | | Interesting stuff. I'm not a seismologist, just a geophysicist. | This stuff interests me as I like to look for patterns in life. | Don't use any of this in any official capacity. Follow the | science and take everything in this post as a simple description | of one person's observations of events and data in one geographic | area that probably could be interpreted in multiple ways, even by | the same person. As such this is meant to entertain, not to | inform. | jedberg wrote: | If you do feel a quake, don't forget to report it to the USGS! | They need your data. | jeanchen wrote: | This is my favorite way of blowing off adrenaline after an | earthquake. It's also fun to watch the reports roll in and see | how different areas were affected. | divbzero wrote: | Don't the USGS have seismographs for detecting earthquakes? | Does human reporting add resolution or other information to | their data? | jedberg wrote: | > Does human reporting add resolution or other information to | their data? | | Yes, a lot. They only have so many seismographs. They ask a | bunch of survey questions that get them a pretty good | qualitative score of the experience in your exact location, | and when merged together gives them a much better picture of | how the waves propagated. | | Also they ask you questions about damage, which they can't | get from anywhere else. | gvhst wrote: | https://earthquake.usgs.gov/data/dyfi/ USGS' "Did you Feel it | Program" helps USGS figure out how seismic waves travel | through the crust, which isn't uniform in density. Useful | beyond seismographs. | Turing_Machine wrote: | Sure, they have seismographs, but they don't necessarily have | full details on all the subsurface geology between you and | the epicenter. Wave propagation can be complicated... | depending on what's down there, the waves can intensified, | dissipated, reflected... | | If (e.g.) everyone in a small area reports strong shaking, | while those in surrounding areas report less, that can | indicate a need for further investigation as to whether the | area that experienced strong shaking poses a specific risk. | DantesKite wrote: | It would be interesting if you could accumulate seismic data | with iPhones. Like if they're stationary for more than 10 | minutes, share data with USGS. | version_five wrote: | I liked the previous title about the Monster of the Cascadian | Basin. I looked it up (found nothing) but came across this on the | cascadian subduction zone: | | https://pnsn.org/outreach/earthquakesources/csz | | This is what's responsible for "megathrust" earthquakes on the | west coast every 400-600 years. It seems we're early for one of | those, so this is probably not that. I'd love to see more info on | the significance, if any, of this movement. | DyslexicAtheist wrote: | there is a great article on this in the new yorker that has | been discussed here a few times. Won some awards for its | writing too: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the- | really-big... | 1shooner wrote: | My favorite line from that article: | | >Kenneth Murphy, who directs FEMA's Region X, the division | responsible for Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska, says, | "Our operating assumption is that everything west of | Interstate 5 will be toast." | Asparagirl wrote: | These too: | | "Until 1974, the state of Oregon had no seismic | code...seventy-five per cent of all structures in the state | are not designed to withstand a major Cascadia quake..." | | "The shaking from the Cascadia quake will set off | landslides throughout the region--up to thirty thousand of | them in Seattle alone...Fifteen per cent of Seattle is | built on liquefiable land, including seventeen day-care | centers and the homes of some thirty-four thousand five | hundred people..." | | "On the coast, those numbers go up. Whoever chooses or has | no choice but to stay there will spend three to six months | without electricity, one to three years without drinking | water and sewage systems, and three or more years without | hospitals..." | jldugger wrote: | So, time to add a lifestraw and shovel to the go bag. | Asparagirl wrote: | Yes, that article is a classic, in the Venn diagram | intersection of "hard science explained well" and "creative | ways to get historical data" and "both local and federal | government failure to plan or address known issues" and "we | were warned" and "absolute nightmare fuel". | | If/when the Cascadia superquake kicks off, everyone will be | passing that link around, so you may as well read it now. | mutagen wrote: | More accurately, these quakes are on a strike-slip fault (named | the Blanco Fracture Zone) on the other side of the Juan de Fuca | plate from the Cascadian Subduction Zone. This fault won't | directly produce 'the big one' but this movement will be | building pressure and tension in the subduction zone. | | https://www.npr.org/2021/12/08/1062365995/50-earthquakes-hit... | | https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sci... | belter wrote: | This site ... integrated over Real time Solar Flares: | https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-fla... | | and random noise form Live Meteor: https://meteorscan.com/meteor- | live.html | | runs my Random Number Generator.... | sheepybloke wrote: | I would be really interested in a write up of this! | g0ran wrote: | How do you seed when there's no activity on all three fronts? | belter wrote: | I fall back on real time neutrino event detection :-) | https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/amon_hese_events.html | nodicksplease wrote: | i hope they fix the browser back button | thedigitalone wrote: | That particular swam of quakes isn't anything to worry about | https://www.npr.org/2021/12/08/1062365995/50-earthquakes-hit... | samiur1204 wrote: | Not really directly connected to the Cascadia Subduction Zone | | https://www.npr.org/2021/12/08/1062365995/50-earthquakes-hit.... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-12-08 23:00 UTC)