[HN Gopher] Can "Distraction-Free" Devices Change the Way We Write?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Can "Distraction-Free" Devices Change the Way We Write?
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 23 points
       Date   : 2021-12-16 20:13 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newyorker.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newyorker.com)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | egypturnash wrote:
       | I sure do get a lot more art done when I am sitting at a cafe or
       | in a park with all my computer's radios turned off to save power.
       | I just gotta make sure I have the references I need so I don't
       | have to turn on the internet again to dig something up and risk
       | getting lost in the finely-tuned attention sinks of modern social
       | media sites.
        
       | hagbard_c wrote:
       | I don't think so, not really. Any computer can be a "distraction-
       | free" device if you want it to be by turning down all
       | distraction-causing services. If you're running an OS which
       | doesn't allow this you can (temporarily or permanently) change to
       | one which does not get in the way. A blank screen with a blinking
       | cursor, ready to accept whatever you care to write. This is
       | possibly in the here and now without having to buy any overpriced
       | single-purpose device, all it takes is... discipline. Don't
       | switch or reboot into the normal blinkenlights-environment, just
       | write.
       | 
       | Given that his has been possible forever I see no reason for
       | single-function writing devices to change how people write. If
       | you want one, get one but realise that the multi-function
       | device(s) you already own can be made to function similarly and
       | you're adding yet another device to your "environmental
       | footprint".
        
       | digitallyfree wrote:
       | Does anyone else feel that this is more of a human problem as
       | opposed to be one solvable by equipment?
       | 
       | Someone who is easily distracted when writing on their computer
       | by browsing the internet, looking at social media, etc. will
       | likely have the same problem when using a dedicated hardware
       | device. Instead, they'll just grab their phone, stare out the
       | window, or daydream instead of focusing on their work. As long as
       | you turn off your email and chat apps (so you aren't bombarded
       | with messages while you write), there's nothing on a computer
       | that will distract you unless you willingly choose to open it.
       | 
       | I actually do a lot of my writing on a eink device, but that's
       | more for eyestrain as opposed to reducing distractions.
        
       | ghaff wrote:
       | I suppose it depends in part on the sort of writing you do.
       | 
       | One of the reasons I basically never write stuff on a plane is
       | that I find, absent Internet (and yes you can often get crappy
       | Internet on a plane but it's also a good time to read books), I
       | find I often need to pepper whatever I write with comments about
       | checking this fact or that fact.
       | 
       | Of course, there was a time in my life when I managed to deal
       | with not having access to the Internet. I also made more factual
       | mistakes and just included less supporting information than I
       | would today.
       | 
       | Even if I do a pile of research in advance, I just find there's a
       | lot of overhead to not being able to verify facts, spellings,
       | etc. on the spot.
        
       | dsizzle wrote:
       | https://archive.md/0XWsG
        
       | pseingatl wrote:
       | This article fails to mention Writeroom, the original
       | distraction-free writing program.
        
       | diego wrote:
       | This question is backwards. We used to write differently with
       | typewriters and notebooks. This is like asking if no longer using
       | a car and instead walking would change the way we move around.
       | The answer is "of course, why would you even ask. Just remember
       | how it used to be."
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | rp1 wrote:
         | I don't think this is a good analogy. Cars can get you long
         | distances quickly. Having this ability means you can have
         | suburbs outside of city centers, travel between cities in a day
         | thus necessitating highways, etc. Cars make possible all sorts
         | of huge, life-altering changes because of how they impact
         | travel.
         | 
         | In terms of long-form writing, word processors make spelling
         | and grammar easier to fix. They also make editing easier, and
         | the internet can be used to reference facts while writing. This
         | comes with a few trade offs, like easily being distracted. Does
         | this impact really seem equivalent to the impact of a car to
         | you?
        
       | johnchristopher wrote:
       | Most likely, yes.
       | 
       | In a previous century:
       | https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/07/26/nietzsche...
       | Nietzsche's Transformative Typewriter and
       | http://stunlaw.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-author-signal-nietzs...
       | The Author Signal: Nietzsche's Typewriter and Medium Theory.
       | 
       | But then:
       | 
       | > The case of Henry James's move from handwriting (typewriting)
       | to dictation in the middle of What Maisie Knew has been studied
       | by Hoover (2009). Yet, according to the NYU professor, the author
       | of The Ambassadors took this sudden change in his stride and,
       | despite the fact that we know exactly where the switch occurred,
       | stylometry has been helpless in this case; or, rather, can show
       | no sudden shift in James's stylistic evolution that continues
       | throughout his career (Hoover 2009).
        
       | voidhorse wrote:
       | I have a freewrite traveler, I don't like it and never use it,
       | here's why:
       | 
       | It uses an eink screen, which has significant latency in
       | comparison with lcd and other screens that render pixels. Won't
       | be an issue if latency doesn't bother you too much, but if you
       | are used to super fast response times in text editors, it will
       | prove annoying. It also has no backlight. Its easy on the eyes
       | during the day but forget about using it in dim conditions.
       | 
       | Their source is closed and not easily extensible. They version
       | your documents using their own propriety cloud backup, which you
       | can then export to various services.
       | 
       | The file manager is clunky and the UI in general, either because
       | of eink limitations or stuff on the software side, is pretty
       | clunky.
       | 
       | The firmware update process is mysterious and does not really
       | give any information to the user.
       | 
       | The outer casing feels cheap.
       | 
       | Try as I might, I cannot find any information on the internal
       | storage limits of the freewrite.
       | 
       | Overall I personally feel the unit is way overpriced at 500
       | dollars.
       | 
       | Even though I dislike the traveller, I still loved the concept,
       | and through further research discovered that KingJim, a Japanese
       | company, makes a similar device, the Pomera DM200, only it has
       | pretty much none of the downsides I mentioned (it uses lcd, not
       | eink so its super responsive, to get files off the device you can
       | use a qr code, email, or sd card) plus other features that are
       | handy (split view, calendar that doubles as a journal, outline
       | mode, and others). Like the freewrite, the outer casing is a bit
       | cheap feeling but it feels sturdier and looks sleeker too.
       | 
       | The only major downside to the pomera is that its ui is only
       | available in Japanese (there are older models that support
       | english but that are no longer in no production and are more
       | expensive to acquire second hand), but even this is easy to get
       | used to. The overall experience and software is imo leagues ahead
       | of freewrite and it only costs around 300 instead of 500.
        
         | naravara wrote:
         | I've heard there are some community projects out there to
         | enable bluetooth keyboard support on those Remarkable tablets.
         | That seems like the best of both worlds to me, especially since
         | you can also move the tablet off and read it like a manuscript
         | and mark it up with a pen.
         | 
         | Although the new iOS version's text-reader is pretty amazing. I
         | wonder if I can just use a real typewriter and digitize the
         | notes from there.
        
         | brandur wrote:
         | Thanks for the detailed notes! Since it was announced, I was
         | always very enticed by the Freewriter Traveler, but never
         | pulled the trigger because despite a couple very positive
         | reviews, I had a haunting suspicion that it wasn't quite up to
         | the standard of quality that I would've liked to see, and
         | moving content in and out just seemed way too painful.
         | 
         | The Pomera DM200 looks really interesting -- pretty sure I
         | recognize this from a guy on my that had one (or something very
         | close to it).
         | 
         | A solution I've been playing around with a lot is the a
         | foldable keyboard (I got this one [1]) plus an iPhone. An
         | iPhone with an external keyboard doesn't give you Cmd + Tab,
         | which makes multi-tasking difficult by default. In addition, it
         | has the additional advantages of:
         | 
         | * Leveraging a device I always have on me and which I charge
         | every night.
         | 
         | * If you get the right keyboard, it's full size, keeping typing
         | non-painful.
         | 
         | ---
         | 
         | [1] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B018K5EJCQ/
        
         | satysin wrote:
         | I have used a few of these devices and I am always disappointed
         | as they lack features I had on my Psion 5mx more than twenty
         | years ago.
         | 
         | The Psion had a better screen, excellent battery life from two
         | AA batteries, very good physical keyboard, excellent size,
         | basically the only thing it lacks in comparison to these modern
         | "solutions" is wifi. Although some even advertise _lack_ of
         | wifi as a _benefit_ as it means even less distraction! I mean
         | come on you 're taking the piss there imho.
         | 
         | Things like the Freewrite Traveler are _shockingly_ over priced
         | and while they may be distraction free they are certainly not
         | frustration free.
        
       | johnla wrote:
       | This might sound dumb and too obvious but why not just turn off
       | wifi and go fullscreen on your editor?
        
       | scotuswroteus wrote:
       | Is Any Establishment Media Article About Tech Going To Act Like
       | 2011 Was a Decade Ago?
        
       | nahuel0x wrote:
       | Forget distraction-free devices, GPT-3 (and his sucessors)
       | assisted co-writing are going to be the most revolutionary change
       | in the way we write.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-16 23:00 UTC)