[HN Gopher] Testing the strength of different wood species
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Testing the strength of different wood species
        
       Author : Ivoah
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2021-12-17 17:23 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (woodgears.ca)
 (TXT) w3m dump (woodgears.ca)
        
       | n-e-w wrote:
       | I respect all wood
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/NTL30rkRYPo
        
       | wforfang wrote:
       | For anyone who found this video satisfying, you may enjoy
       | "Structures : Or Why Things Don't Fall Down" by Gordon.
        
         | ggm wrote:
         | This plus one thousand. Great book. "The new science of strong
         | materials" is also good.
        
       | dalke wrote:
       | There's an interesting connection between this and edge-notched
       | punched cards (a special interest of mine), via a 1936 article in
       | Nature (See https://www.nature.com/articles/137535a0 .)
       | 
       | Quoting Kilgour's "Origins of Coordinate Searching" at
       | https://books.google.se/books?hl=sv&lr=&id=4crkFsx73msC&oi=f... .
       | 
       | > In 1936, S. H. Clarke, of Britain's Forest Products Research
       | Laboratory at Princes Risborough, published a brief note in
       | Nature reporting on an unexpected observation: Detection of
       | relations of ''recorded features'' on edge notched punched cards
       | with a particular feature already sorted.
       | 
       | > He had sorted a file of several hundred cards each listing a
       | specimen of timber, by increases in specific gravity, and noticed
       | ''by glancing at the arrangement of the other notches . . . a
       | distinct tendency for strength to increase with specific
       | gravity'' (Clarke, 1936, p. 535). He added that it was easy to
       | recognize unusual correlations among notches.
       | 
       | The spreadsheet plot in this video is essentially the same as the
       | image in the 1936 Nature publication!
        
       | Gravityloss wrote:
       | For weight constrained beam applications, both bending and
       | compression failures are bending related (tension isn't).
       | 
       | Since bending strength is proportional to the cube of thickness
       | of a beam, wouldn't less dense materials in practice always win
       | out since you can make the beam thicker?
       | 
       | Ie the characteristic metric for beams would be stiffness /
       | density^3
        
         | ggm wrote:
         | That qualification of weight constraint. Brick pillars have
         | sufficient compressive strength to hold fantastic weight, steel
         | or stone as much if not more so (the structural rigidity of the
         | bricks will largely depend on the mortar and skill of laying
         | the courses) so I think this is a peculiar niche to be in.
         | Church roofs use heavy trusses, the compression load is a big
         | part of building strength in flying buttresses and arches.
        
         | MatthiasWandel wrote:
         | Typically the beam has to fit where it needs to go. A lighter
         | beam doesn't mean you have room for a bigger one.
        
       | zokier wrote:
       | One thing that saddens me in the region I live is the lack of
       | diversity in forests and therefore also in lumber selection.
       | Quickly googling up some stats, 65% of forests are pine and 24%
       | spruce. Only major hardwood would be birch (9% of forests), and
       | its usually not available as lumber afaik.
       | 
       | One of my dreams (in the category "if I were a billionaire")
       | would be to buy some large piece of land and plant all sort of
       | interesting trees to create a sort of fantasy forest.
        
         | gotorazor wrote:
         | Not true. I used to work at a lumber company. If you're in
         | North America, you can usually buy some kind of hardwood. For
         | utility lumber, they probably can't tell you what kind of
         | hardwood it is, but it will be hardwood.
        
           | zokier wrote:
           | > If you're in North America, you can usually buy some kind
           | of hardwood
           | 
           | That's the thing, I'm not in NA, so pretty much any hardwoods
           | available here are "exotic" imports.
        
       | ilamont wrote:
       | There's an episode of Grand Designs (season 10 or 11 IIRC) where
       | the couple building the home chose Japanese larch for the
       | cladding for their home in Wales. The specialist lumberyard used
       | some sort of handheld tool to measure the density of the trees
       | (harvested in Wales) and it was extremely strong ... but the show
       | also noted the strength could vary widely from batch to batch,
       | depending on variables such as age, soils, etc.
       | 
       | Some details: http://www.cilfiegansawmill.com/forestry-wales/
        
       | irrational wrote:
       | I'm not surprised by Osage Orange. There is a reason it is prized
       | by bow (as in archery) makers.
       | 
       | Too bad they couldn't do Yew too. That is another top bow wood.
        
         | silisili wrote:
         | For anyone who doesn't know or look this up, Osage Oranges are
         | what we in the Midwest called 'hedge apples', those creepy
         | alien looking green balls you'd see littered in yards.
        
         | tapvt wrote:
         | Relevant article from Texas Monthly regarding the history of
         | Osage Orange:
         | 
         | https://www.texasmonthly.com/being-texan/osage-orange-histor...
        
         | billti wrote:
         | If you watch the linked video, six mins in he has a "bow score"
         | based on strength and flex. Osage Orange was 2nd, after
         | Dogwood.
        
         | jimmyrocks wrote:
         | After watching this, I made the connection that the French
         | "Bois d'arc" for Osage Orange refers to its use in bows. It
         | turns out that Osage Orange really is one of the best woods for
         | bows.
        
       | esotericsean wrote:
       | So cool to see Matthias here on HN. He has a ton of other
       | articles and videos where he tests different things like this. I
       | encourage you guys to check him out if you haven't.
        
         | slig wrote:
         | Matthias is such an inspiration. A true hacker, I'd say.
        
           | stcredzero wrote:
           | I remember that he was recently trying to get hired at a tech
           | company. (He was doing something like an Arduino auto-
           | targeting Nerf gun as a portfolio piece.) Did someone nab
           | him?
           | 
           | I remember the days when YouTube videos were automatically
           | flagged as "shallow" by the HN code!
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | I wonder how the "wood" 3D filament which is particles embedded
       | in a brown PLA would compare. PLA is generally quite weak, this
       | filament is only suitable for ornamental things.
       | 
       | https://all3dp.com/2/wood-filament-for-a-3d-printer-explaine...
       | 
       | For the actual woods, I am not suprised by the ironwood. I once
       | had a coffee table with an ironwood top and it was ridiculously
       | dense and strong.
       | 
       | also, did you know there's an ironwood smuggling problem
       | internationally?
       | 
       | https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=ironwood+...
        
         | almog wrote:
         | I would guess that much like MDF, PLA wood's strength is
         | determined by the binding agent. My understanding of this
         | product is that it's basically sawdust + PLA, whereas a wood's
         | strength is stemmed (sorry!!) from its grain.
        
       | l33tbro wrote:
       | This is really fun - but isn't information about the janka of
       | most species already fairly accessible online? [1].
       | 
       | I always assumed there was a slight degree of strength variance
       | due to age, humidity of growth region, etc - but maybe having
       | your own tester might come in handy for certain structural
       | engineering cases where accuracy is crucial.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.wood-database.com/wood-articles/janka-hardness/
        
         | thethirdone wrote:
         | I haven't checked, but I would assume the janka hardness of
         | wood is not super tightly correlated with yield strength. I
         | would expect a variation of 2x for a the janka hardness :
         | strength ratio; some wood would be twice as strong or half as
         | strong as you might expect from the hardness.
        
       | scns wrote:
       | Without reading the article (gotta be honest), Ipe should rate
       | highly if they test it. It is very dense. Heavier than water, it
       | sinks.
        
         | swayvil wrote:
         | Hey I was thinking about ipe too. Bugproof, toxic dust and
         | smoke. Heavy as heck. So hard you break bits, dull blades.
         | Beautiful color and grain. Looks like walnut. Got a piece in my
         | lap right now.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | Australian hardwoods are a bit like this. Jarrah looks
           | amazing, is crazy heavy and sinks. New Zealand power poles
           | are still sometimes Jarrah.
           | 
           | Another odd one is old olive. I've had sections that when hit
           | with an axe won't split and bounce the axe. And seemingly
           | remain unmarked. Splitting gnarled olive is miserable.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-18 23:00 UTC)