[HN Gopher] Learn accounting for free ___________________________________________________________________ Learn accounting for free Author : mooreds Score : 244 points Date : 2021-12-20 14:58 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.accountingcoach.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.accountingcoach.com) | asimpletune wrote: | A really good way to learn accounting is to read the GnuCash | manual. It's both excellent software documentation and you have | to learn the fundamentals of accounting to follow it. | DantesKite wrote: | Has anyone taken this course? | | On a side note, it's too bad there's no easy way to assess the | quality of educational courses. You think there would be a | standardized metric by now. | nubela wrote: | Is there an eBook version of this? | mooreds wrote: | Looks like there is are PDFs available if you pay for them. | | From https://www.accountingcoach.com/about : | | > PDF versions of all our Core Materials | | From clicking through the "Learn More" link, seems like a one- | time fee of $49 gets you the PDFs. (As Patio11 would say, the | author should raise his prices.) | hbcondo714 wrote: | > You can access a corporation's Form 10-K by going to the | Investor Relations section of the corporation's website[1] | | Shameless plug: you can try https://Last10K.com to get 10-K | annual reports aggregated in one site. This includes all | financial statements (ex.Balance Sheets) broken out so you don't | have to find them in a lengthy 10-K. | | [1] https://www.accountingcoach.com/balance-sheet- | new/explanatio... | r00fus wrote: | Work in the FINs domain, and have been using this for years to | teach basics to newbies. Great stuff. | PopAlongKid wrote: | I did not see any topics at the posted link devoted to tax | accounting. Most small businesses (U.S., at least) have a lot of | flexibility in how they keep their company books, but the core | process of preparing the tax return involves making appropriate | book-to-tax adjustments according to tax law. So the company will | have at least two versions of the key reports, one for book | purposes and one for tax purposes. | onphonenow wrote: | I'm not a fan of debits / credits for folks not going into | accounting properly. | | Porter has a book - the alternatives to debits and credits, using | financial information. | | Basically accounting is an equation you keep in balance. | | Assets = Liabilities + Equity | | You can understand how any transaction "posts" by keeping this | equation in balance (or solving it). | | You borrowed $100K? Your liabilities are + 100K, and cash (an | asset) is also + 100K. Books in balance. | | (Change in) Equity = Income - Expense | | Extends this formula to your profit and loss statement if needed. | Errors accumulate in the balance sheet as well. | | Note that balance sheet is more important. With two balance | sheets at different times I can see my net income for that period | (no categorization of income / expense needed). | darcys22 wrote: | I find what you have said harder to follow than just knowing | debits are positive and credits are negative. | | The A=L+OE formula is a poor model for understanding accounting | when the accounts dont fall neatly into those 5 high level | categories. And unfortunately you almost immediately encounter | accounts of that nature (accumulated depreciation and loans are | great examples). | onphonenow wrote: | What happens if I debit a loan account? Debits are not | positive, a debit to a loan account is a negative that | reduces it. If I issue a refund that might be a debit to an | income account (that is a negative to the account total). | PopAlongKid wrote: | >debits are positive and credits are negative | | That's a drastic oversimplification. Typically, both debits | and credits are entered into an accounting program as | positive numbers, and it is the nature of the account being | debited or credited that determines whether the number is | added to or subtracted from the account balance. | | Or, as the old joke goes, an accountant for years would | always start the work day by opening a locked desk drawer, | removing a piece of paper, and studying it for a moment | before returning it to the drawer. After his sudden and | unexpected death one day, one of his staff had to satisfy | their curiosity and opened the drawer to see what was written | on the paper. It said, "debits to the window, credits to the | door". | | To get it, you need to know that by tradition, debits are | entered on the left-hand side of the entry form, and credits | on the right hand side. | EvanAnderson wrote: | All accounts "fall neatly" into the broad categories, though. | There are sub-categories for accounts with contrary normal | balances for a given type of a given account category but | they still summarize into their parent category. | | A contra-equity account (like "Owner draws") has a normal | debit balance. That's contrary to the normal credit balance | of an equity account. It still summarizes to equity and | results in the owner's draws being debited from the owner's | equity debit balance. | | When I hear programmers talking about debits / credits like | they're positive or negative I get a feeling that they're | trying to re-invent a really simple "wheel" that they don't | want to understand. It reminds me of wild gyrations | programmers go thru w/ ORM's to avoid just learning some SQL. | natpalmer1776 wrote: | This is really cool! | | I constantly hear people complaining about accountants creating | problems by not understanding how "things really work" so it | would be great to be able to see things from an accounting | perspective! | acjohnson55 wrote: | That's like a baseball player telling a Newtonian physicist | that they don't understand how things really work. In some | sense they're right, in that there are higher level details | that are hard to capture in the math, and technically, the math | does not describe an even lower level of reality. But there's | still a lot that someone operating from an intuitive | understanding can learn from someone who brings an analytical | framework. | cascom wrote: | haha, few things from my experience: | | 1)its terrifying how many people in c-suite roles (including | purported CFOs and CEOs), and commercial/sales/product | development roles don't actually understand accounting and | finance basics. | | 2) the number of bookkeepers that pretend to be real | accountants, but really they are just power users of a given | accounting system | | 3) the massive miscommunication that takes place when two | people that don't know what they are talking about try to tell | the other what to do. | zerop wrote: | Pardon my ignorance if any, but I find financials and accounting | as quite boring things. Most problems in these are about tracing | numbers, reconciliation and mismatches. What thril one can face | in these areas? Any examples of challenges you see ? | conductr wrote: | I think accounting has that reputation for a reason, it really | is bean counting | | All this is theory and essentially a bunch of "hello world" | equivalents. In the real world, corporate accounting is much | more complex for most companies. I don't know if it makes it | more thrilling, but it can be challenging. | whartung wrote: | Modern data processing is all about work flows and data flows, | and accounting is gorged with that stuff. | | There's a reason that there are 3000 different businesses, but | 6000 different accounting packages. At a glance, they're all | the same. But accounting data processing is all about the last | mile. That 10% that the company does differently. | | Now, when folks say "accounting" they typically mean General | Ledger, Accounts Payable, and Account Receivable (GLAPAR as we | called it). In truth, it's really about the General Ledger, | everything is else is about feeding the GL. Most of the reports | come from the GL. | | GL is where all the numbers are tallied up. AP is stuff you owe | people. AR is stuff people owes you. Then you have the | distribution systems that tend to fee AP and AR. (Mind these | are all broad strokes.) | | Consider an Amazon order. You went to the site and ordered a | radio and stick of deodorant. Honestly, the mind reels about | the accounting impact of that order. | | Amazon has to account for the money you're paying, the value of | the goods sold, the taxes (potentially multiple jurisdictions), | the shipping, and the credit card fees. Meanwhile, the costs of | those goods include not just the value of the goods, the labor | involved in taking off a truck, putting it on a shelf, taking | it off a shelf and putting it on a truck. The cost of the box. | The cost of the label. | | ALL of that hits the GL in to its own slot, in its own account. | The total number of GL entries for a single order is probably | dozens, even for simple orders (no doubt it gets more fun with | associates and folks selling through Amazon, etc. etc.). This | is where all that chasing of imbalances happens. With double | entry accounting, everything has to balance. | | And worse, not only is it explosive in its detail, it can | CHANGE, at any time! Business change their minds on how they | track things, what they want to track, when they want to track. | It could be marketing asking questions, it could be regulatory, | it could be anything. It's a very dynamic environment. | | At one place I had to rewrite pricing and discount logic every | 6 months as they came up with new schemes. (Oh, and don't | forget, all of the OLD schemes are still in play -- don't think | you can forget about those when someone calls up 90 days later | asking for a credit). And you'd think you could do something | "generic". No. The marketing people are very creative. | | At one place, a smaller business, probably cut 100 checks a | week. They had a product canceled. Thousands of refunds. We had | to run several large boxes of checks through the band printer. | I can not convey to you briefly how impactful that process was. | "Cutting a check", I hope you can imagine, is a very controlled | process, and we had to stomp through the lot of the internal | workflows to get that done. Lots of eyes were on the process. | (Remember, the pre-printed check numbers had to match the | transactions in the system, let's hope the paper doesn't jam.) | Outside in, it seems stupid, boring, and silly. When you're in | the thick of it, it's like a rocket launch. Lot of time | invested it getting this all right. | | As data processing people, we strive to manage complexity. Our | job is to make the systems and processes accessible to the | people who rely on them, and as well as adapt to their ever | changing needs for the business. | | Working back office accounting and distribution is a | surprisingly target rich environment for interesting work that | can be crushed in detail. But our job is to wrangle that. | | You don't need to be an accountant to do this, but it's good to | learn the vocabulary: debits, credits, journals, posting, | agings, etc. etc. | | And, finally, everyone does this. Having "accounting" | experience pretty much qualifies you for all sorts of | businesses. Each one you have to learn a little bit of domain | knowledge, but the accounting terms themselves are a common | grounding that gets your foot in the door. I've written systems | for warehousing, meat brokers, paint shops, plant growers, auto | parts, and magazine publishing, just as a start. | | Honestly, it beats healthcare. | calderarrow wrote: | I'm a CPA and have undergraduate and graduate degrees in | accounting. To be completely honest, the bulk of financial | accounting is not that thrilling. The bulk of the profession is | spent keeping up with the regulations for tracing numbers, | reconciling schedules, and "accounting" for things. | | But let me share what makes the field thrilling for me: | | Accounting is a universal language for valuing time. Clocks | allow us to measure time, but accounting allows us to assign | time value. It, quite literally, allows us to compare apples to | oranges (or Apple to Amazon). | | This is important because time is the single most valuable | resource any of us have. It's both the scarcest resource and | the most liquid, but it's only liquid in one direction. Time | can be exchanged for anything: food, drink, entertainment, | love, death. But nothing can be exchanged for more time in my | life. | | We can, however, exchange our time for the time of others. | Without being able to do this, our quality of lives would be | terrible. But how many of my programming-hours is worth a | T-shirt? How many chai-latte-making-hours is worth a heart | transplant? It's not enough to count the hours, we have to | assign value to the hours. Accounting is the system and | language we use to value different units of time. It's a | universally applicable language that is consistent in its | application. It applies to a child running a lemonade stand and | trillion dollar multinationals. Whether you're a charity or a | bank, a government or a revolutionary, the rules of accounting | are applicable to whatever it is that you're doing, whatever is | it that you've done in the past, and whatever it is that you'll | do in the future. | | Currently, I work as a software engineer for a fintech company, | and I find that the most fun I have at work is engineering | something from scratch. Thinking of the architecture, mocking | up the algorithms, and implementing a new solution to a problem | is vastly more thrilling than maintaining existing systems or | hotfixing minor bugs. Yet, the bulk of my job is maintaining | systems that other people built. And, if I'm being honest, | sometimes boring. | | Similarly, the thrill of accounting is in learning how to more | appropriately account for transactions, new goods, or new | services. How should we account for someone who mines a crypto | currency? How should we account for someone who trades a crypto | but doesn't mine it? How do we account for auto insurance for | self-driving cars? These are the thrilling aspects of | accounting. | | But for the bulk of the job, it's probably a bit boring. | Working on a team to fix other people's technical mistakes. | Reviewing documentation, getting access to various systems. | Sounds a bit like software engineering! | cascom wrote: | my two cents - bookkeeping (the act of doing all the | transactions that result in financial statements) is quite | boring, but at the end of the day the purpose of accounting is | to provide information around the financial condition and | results of the business, which it turn is and should be used to | make decisions around the future of the business. | | Accounting (in its various forms (financial, cost, mgmt, tax)) | should help you answer questions like: what is our most | profitable product? how much does it cost to make that product? | was that acquisition/investment successful? sales are going up | and net income is positive, why don't we have any cash? | | But when you get under the hood, there is a lot of subjectivity | around how to make accruals, allocate revenue and expenses, or | capitalization policies. | | Furthermore, many people in different organizations are | incented on financial metrics (sales, EBITDA, EPS, equity | value, etc) and as such have are keenly focused on gamesmanship | around the calculation of those numbers. | r00fus wrote: | I see accounting as the money version of a historical account | of a company. In that vein, it's the complete data flow of | money movements within said company - data from which you could | determine strategic priorities, fraud, and power structure, | among other things with the right analysis. | | I wonder if there's a good flick that shows how powerful a | forensic accountant can be. | PopAlongKid wrote: | >I wonder if there's a good flick that shows how powerful a | forensic accountant can be. | | "The Accountant" starring Ben Affleck has it as a plot | element. | acjohnson55 wrote: | I felt the same way until I decided that I needed to understand | what was happening with every dollar my wife and I took in, in | order for us to make decisions like how much we should invest | or keep in savings for emergencies. I ran into all sorts of | issues reconciling different information and had to revisit my | modeling several times. | | Only after discussing with my brother, who went to business | school, did I realize I was gradually discovering my own half- | assed version of accounting. Then I started reading Wikipedia | and Investopedia about accounting topics, and it seemed a lot | less dry. | rchaud wrote: | > What thril one can face in these areas? Any examples of | challenges you see ? | | Mission Briefing: | | Your CEO has blurted out a revenue growth estimate for H2 2022 | on an investor conference call, without prior vetting from the | CFO. | | Mission Objective: | | Put forward a plan for modifying revenue recognition rules on | sales so that the CEO's estimate can be met. Your plan must be | compliant with GAAP principles and cannot involve backdating or | forward-dating revenue by adjusting the refund eligibility | dates. | rahimnathwani wrote: | Background: I'm a qualified accountant, and have taught courses | on accounting and finance. | | My thoughts on OP: | | I read through the first two parts of the first course on this | site: | | - Part 1 Introduction to Accounting Basics, A Story for Relating | to Accounting Basics | | - Part 2 Income Statement | | Based on what I read, I could not recommend this. You could get | to the end of the 'income statement' part, without encountering | any definition of 'profit', which is the very thing that the | income statement is meant to show. | | If you want a solid introduction to accounting, I'd recommend | Frank Wood's book "Business Accounting 1". You don't need the | latest (15th edition). The principles haven't changed. I used the | 10th edition: Business Accounting Volume 1 | https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0273681494/ | tomnipotent wrote: | I do not believe that either GAAP or IFRS has a standard | definition for "profit". Even GAAP under 703(a) refers to it as | net income (and several other related numbers like gross | profit). | antman wrote: | Would reading IFRS suffice? Is there a suggested book? | rahimnathwani wrote: | The IFRS standards presume the reader is familiar with | accounting principles and practice. They provide guidance | specific to (i) certain more complex/unusual situations, | e.g. business combinations, and (ii) specific verticals, | e.g. consumer lending and insurance. | rahimnathwani wrote: | Yes profit is the same as net income. | | But you wouldn't know that if you read those two sections of | the text. They use the word 'profitability' several times, | without ever defining it. | | Right at the end of part 2 (income statement), they say this: | | "The difference (or "net") between the revenues and expenses | for Direct Delivery is often referred to as the bottom line | and it is labeled as either Net Income or Net Loss." | | The above is true, but it's kind of hard to grasp for someone | whose only exposure to accounting is this site. And the | previous sentence again refers to 'profitability' without | being explicit that 'profit' and 'net income' are the same | thing. | nightski wrote: | If you go to the actual section on financial | statements/income statement it breaks it down much further | which is what I would expect. | rahimnathwani wrote: | Which part of which section? (I only looked at section 1, | parts 1 and 2.) | Closi wrote: | Well, net profit is the same as net income. | | Gross profit is different. | xboxnolifes wrote: | The point isn't about whether they are the same or not. | The point is the the _teaching_ material isn 't very | clear on the terminology used. | rahimnathwani wrote: | If you're a mathy person, you might find this brief explanation | is enough to get going. Where I say 'you', I mean 'your | company', not you personally. | | * Assets: things you own (e.g. tractor, money in bank, money | owed by customers) | | * Liabilities: things you owe (e.g. unpaid supplier bills, loan | owed to bank) | | * Assets and liabilities are both measured in a single currency | (e.g. $). | | * Equity (aka 'book value'): A measure of the value of the | company. Calculated as Assets minus Liabilities. | | Two ways to write the equation above: | | * Equity = Assets - Liabilities | | * Equity + Liabilities = Assets | | Equity changes in response to (i) company operations, and (ii) | financing activities. | | Financing activities are things like: | | - selling new shares | | - buying back shares (or paying dividends) | | - borrowing money (bank loans, or issuing bonds) | | If there were no financing activities in the period, then | profit is the derivative of equity with respect to time. It's a | measure of the change in (book) value over a period. | | If book value went up, you made a profit. If book value went | down, you made a loss. | | (Of course, book value would also go up if you just sold some | shares, and profit doesn't count those changes, as they're just | financing activities.) | haberman wrote: | This blog entry taught me a mathy way of understanding | double-entry accounting: | https://martin.kleppmann.com/2011/03/07/accounting-for- | compu... | | Summarized: a ledger is a directed graph of accounts, where | edges are transactions, and each transaction is recorded | twice: in the "from" node and the "to" node. | rahimnathwani wrote: | The article is mostly correct[0], and is very good if the | explanation clicks for you. | | I suspect some people (even some HN readers) would find it | easier to think of ledgers as lists of transactions with | running totals. | | [0] e.g. it's not strictly true that book value is a lower | bound on company value | antaviana wrote: | AFAIK, borrowing money does not change Equity, because it | increases Assets (more money in the bank) and Liabilities | (more debt) by the same amount so Equity stays the same. | xbryanx wrote: | Where are you borrowing this money without any interest? | "Money you borrow" and "cost to borrow that money" are | rarely the same value. | dragonwriter wrote: | Normal interest that will be charged if the debt is not | paid off is initially neither an asset or liability, it | is an expense as it is charged. | rahimnathwani wrote: | If you take a $1MM loan from a bank: | | - Your bank account (an asset) goes up by $1MM | | - Your loan account (a liability) goes up by $1MM | | So equity is unchanged at that point. | | But every month after that, you'll be charged interest: | | - Loan account (liability) increases (CR) | | - P+L account (equity) decreases (DR) | ALittleLight wrote: | Presumably you'd have to pay back more than you get in | the loan, right? Wouldn't your liability increase by more | than a million dollars? | brewdad wrote: | Not until the interest accrues. You could (no idea why | you would) borrow $1MM and immediately pay it back before | owing any interest. You would need to reflect this on | your books but nothing material has changed. | riccardomc wrote: | This is true in a perfect market, based on Modigliani- | Miller theory of capital structure. | | In reality, increasing debt to a certain point also | increases risk, which in turn increases return on equity. | rahimnathwani wrote: | A change in return on equity isn't the same as a change | in equity. | | When a company takes a loan, even if that loan is so | large as to make insolvency almost inevitable, there is | no impact on equity (book value). | mcguire wrote: | * should increase return on equity. :-) | rahimnathwani wrote: | Sorry, yes, I should have been more clear! | | 1. Profit/loss measures changes in equity resulting from | operating activity, as opposed to financing activities | (which just rearrange how the company is financed). | | 2. Examples of financing activities are taking out (or | paying back) loans, issuing (or buying back) shares, and | issuing dividends. | | 3. Some (not all, as you point out!) of those financing | activities will increase or decrease equity. So, when | thinking about profit as the rate of change of book value, | you should be careful add back any changes that are the | result of financing activities. (specifically: ignore | changes in equity due to money going to, or coming from, | shareholders) | arbuge wrote: | This brings back memories. We Frank Wood's BA1 to learn | accounting at O-Level back in the late 80s in Malta! I wonder | what edition that one was... | solatic wrote: | > Based on what I read, I could not recommend this. You could | get to the end of the 'income statement' part, without | encountering any definition of 'profit', which is the very | thing that the income statement is meant to show. | | The thing is, that while cash is a matter of fact, profit is a | question of opinion. This is a fundamental truism in | accounting. You cannot really teach how accounting allows you | to express your opinion until you first understand which facts | you have to work with. | rahimnathwani wrote: | If that's the case, it seems even more strange to have the | first two parts of the first section repeatedly refer to | 'profitability'. | | But I don't agree that you have to start with facts. I think | you can start with the account equation, then go on to types | of asset/liability/equity, and only then move on to concrete | examples of transactions, and how they impact the balance | sheet. And then you compare two snapshots of your balance | sheet to show what profit is. | | You can do all this with concrete examples with virtually no | risk (e.g. a lemonade stand where people pay cash before they | are served, with almost no equipment to depreciate, no long- | lived inventory etc.). | teh_klev wrote: | > Frank Wood's book "Business Accounting 1" | | Pretty sure that was the book I grudged most having to pay for | when I was at college in 1986. I truly despised accounting ;) | | Three years later and I end up writing code to extend dbFlex | and supporting Pegasus accounting software, go figure :) | rahimnathwani wrote: | I found it in 2005 or 2006, a year or two after my MBA, and a | few months after I started studying for professional | accountancy exams. | | I wish I'd found it earlier. It was more in-depth than the | MBA material on financial reporting, and was presented more | logically than the study guides I'd been using. | tomcam wrote: | I feel you. One of the classes I failed during my brief time | in college was symbolic logic. But I was a music major so who | cared. A few years later I taught myself to program, and of | course C & assembly were filled with Boolean operations and | truth tables... | boppo1 wrote: | Any advice for intermediate or advanced accounting? I studied | finance in school, so I'm confident it the broad-strokes | basics, but getting into deeper stuff is still intimidating. | rahimnathwani wrote: | I'm not sure of your starting point or your goals, but maybe: | | 1. Wood's Business Accounting 2 | | 2. Some of the CFA study materials | | 3. Some of the 10kdiver threads: | https://10kdiver.com/twitter-threads/ | | 4. Books about financial fraud (that talk about incorrect | ways to do accounting). | | 5. IFRS standards for your industry. | | 6. Googling 'Accounting for X', where X is something to do | with your industry (e.g. 'virtual goods' or 'unpaid loan | interest'). | rahimnathwani wrote: | One more thing - I think it's enlightening to, at least | once, build financial statements from a set of | transactions, and then to dig back from the summary, to the | original transactions, i.e. | | 1. Export all the transactions from your accounting | software (from the start of time, to the end of last | month). | | 2. Export the chart of accounts from your accounting | software. | | 3. Load these into two separate tabs in Excel. | | 4. Add a column to #1, that maps the account to the | relevant account type (e.g. 'assets') and statement (BS or | P&L), using #2 as a lookup table. | | 5. Create a pivot table from #1, to create a balance sheet. | | 6. Create another pivot table from #1, but this time use | time (month or year) as a dimension. | | 7. See if you can relate some of the balance sheet and P&L | values from your spreadsheet, with the values on the | statements produced by your accounting software. | | 8. Assuming they match, go back to the balance sheet pivot | table and double-click on one of the non-zero values. You | will see a history of every transaction that changed that | account. | boppo1 wrote: | Thanks! | ilhamsgenius wrote: | mindslight wrote: | I've never gotten the reconciliation of many of these "learn | accounting" guides with what it takes to do actual accounting. | They seem to make a big deal of covering very basic concepts that | I would expect anybody with a programming background to pick up | in under 10 minutes. The topics covered by these guides are less | complex than most APIs. | | But when it comes time to do actual accounting, there is a whole | host of much more complicated concepts - depreciation, | capitalization, tax law, tax law, tax law, etc. And these never | seem to be explained in any comprehensive way that would make me | think I "know" accounting. Rather it's like the pedagogy is | focused on basic math (which people call "accounting"), because | you will only learn all of the details with experience. | | I even felt this same divide when I tried out Quickbooks, which I | had thought was one of the gold standards for small business | accounting. I was hoping for something that would walk me through | how I needed to categorize expenses, track assets for | depreciation, etc. Instead I was greeted with basically a | spreadsheet replacement to automate problems I didn't have (eg | printing checks at scale). | | Am I wildly off base here, or is there something else I'm | missing? | | Taking a look at the site posted, it does seems to have many | chapters with later ones covering advanced topics. But for | instance taking a look at the chapter on depreciation, there are | still additional details you'd actually need to do your taxes. I | can understand how a simpler model helps someone learning this as | their "first field", and they'll learn the richer model later. | But from the perspective of someone who knows how to program, I'm | still left wondering what value there is from reading general | guides versus eg directly digging into what tax law forces you to | calculate. | dugmartin wrote: | Quickbooks uses double entry accounting at its core but hides | it as single entry accounting (like Quicken) by presenting most | UI as entries into registers that represent assets (like the | checkbox register or invoices) or liabilities (like bills or | credit cards) while hiding owner's equity behind a year-end | closing dialog. | | For example instead of having to learn what accounts to debit | and credit when invoicing and then receiving payment from a | customer you enter invoices in the invoice UI and receive | payments in the receive payments and it takes care of the | debits and credits for you. | | You can use Quickbooks to directly do double entry accounting | by entering company journal entries. You (or your | bookkeeper/accountant) will do that for more complex | transactions that don't have a dedicated UI like, for example, | partially returning a damage deposit to a tenant with the | remainder covering repairs needed. | | I took a community college course in Accounting when I was | thinking about enrolling in an MBA back in the '90s. You can | learn the math in a really short amount of time - it is just | basic addition/subtraction. It does take a while to get an | intuitive feel as to why some things are debit normal and some | are credit normal. Doing a bunch of "T" accounts will bake it | into your brain. There are some good graphics here about that | (first site I found while Googling) - | https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/ac... | mindslight wrote: | So these "T accounts" are exactly what I'm talking about. | Reading that page it just seems to be a visual method of | replacing negative signs, explained very verbosely. This | seems it might have been a really valuable invention for | someone in 1494. But in 2021 when we're comfortable with | defining rich semantic models, it's just quaint. Like for | instance it leaves out the date, whether the transaction has | tax relevance, a link to its corresponding second entry, etc. | | I know this is apostasy, but even "double entry" itself feels | this way to me, compared with say more freeform "tags". Like | if you pay an expense for repairs, which is deductible for | federal tax but not state tax, then it seems the only way to | represent that expense in strict double book is to have 4 | accounts for (Repairs_Notax, Repairs_Fed, Repairs_State, | Repairs_FedState). Whereas what I really want is for that | transaction in possibly multiple expense accounts. | | I swear I'm asking this in good faith. Maybe my questions are | ultimately born of the Lisp curse where computation has | gotten so easy I'm eschewing what I perceive to be | overdiligent focus on the mechanics. But if anywhere can | examine this critically it's HN. | PopAlongKid wrote: | re: Quickbooks. It has now basically bifurcated into an online | version and a desktop version, with somewhat different | features. QB will in fact walk you through an optional setup | interview to ask about what your general type of business is | (service, retail, etc) and will create a default chart of | accounts, which takes care of part of your need (how to | categorize expenses). It becomes more complicated when the | whole optional layer of "items" used to create invoices and | bills gets added in. There is a fixed asset function, but QB is | not really designed to calculate depreciation, rather it is | normally handled with an annual journal entry based on output | from the tax return. | | It does have some frequent traps for new users, who for example | often don't understand "undeposited funds" and end up double- | counting their revenue. Or, they don't realize that when they | transfer money from say checking to savings, the entry made in | one account register is automatically reflected in the other. | mindslight wrote: | I was using the offline version obviously. In a VM with no | network access. I do recall some wizards for setting up | accounts, but they weren't applicable to my business. It also | didn't feel like such wizards would have changed the UI into | operating at a higher level. | marton_s wrote: | I'm a software engineer who moved into freelance consulting a few | years ago (I do back-ends and front-ends for mobile and web, | nothing finance specific other than occasional credit card | payment integrations). It's been a roller-coaster in many regards | and one of the highlights is having learned a lot about | bookkeeping, taxes, financial planning and everything that comes | with running a small business in general. (Aspects which I | initially despised but now I've accepted as necessary and doing | them as routine.) | | During these years I started playing with the idea of training | myself in basic/intermediate accounting and/or finance. The | motivation is twofold: run my own business better (and maybe stop | paying an accountant to do my taxes) and maybe work on software | projects in finance (where I suspect there is good money to be | made). | | I'd be interested hearing stories from fellow software engineers | who did similar training! | cheradenine_uk wrote: | UK based, so YMMV. | | Moved from self-employed for the odd side gig, to UK LTD co, to | VAT registered UK LTD co. | | The "business services mafia" will like to frighten you into | believing you have to drop hundreds of PS on their services - | plus PS120/yr for an accounts package, more for payroll, | business banking, etc. | | Because your mind is too tiny to comprehend the ways of the | priests. e.g: Don't ever ask a question in a business forum, | you'll get swamped with the clergy telling you the question | implies you're definitely going to prison because you're going | to get it all wrong. | | Do not believe them. | | It is perfectly possible - perhaps even 'easy' - and if you | understand the basics of double-entry accounting, all entirely | learnable without too much effort. And best of all, you can do | it almost for free! | | Don't drop hundreds per year on Xero, use | https://www.quickfile.co.uk. Cost: PS0 (upsell on receipt | scanning, but I don't use that). Does VAT, with electronic | submission. I literally don't understand why you'd spend money | on Xero - the extent to which it's advertised over here is | insane; you're just paying for TV advertising. | | Payroll (and all the tax calculation): Free, for up to 3 users. | https://www.shapepayroll.com | | Business banking: Tide. 20p/per transaction (no monthly fees!) | | The hardest parts are - discipline of entering the transactions | and not letting them build up - in the UK, understanding | capital allowances vs depreciation - when doing payroll how to | split the payments into the correct accounts (shape does the | sums, you have to account for it correctly) - Make sure you pay | all your HMRC bills - Doing the year end as a micro-entity (the | CT600 corporation tax return) is actually surprisingly easy, | and amounts to putting numbers in about 6 boxes. | | By all means pay for all of this stuff if it isn't of interest | to you. For me, as I intend my co to run long after I finish | working, I didn't want to have annual fees for services that I | really wouldn't be getting the use out of. | xbryanx wrote: | This sounds like every interaction I've had asking a question | in a plumbing/electrician forum. Oh, if you're asking that | question your definitely going to poison your entire house | with sewer gas and/or burn the place down with that wiring. | tomcam wrote: | If you knew me you would understand why these warnings are | necessary... | sundarurfriend wrote: | Reminds me of David Mitchell's bit/rant in Would I Lie To | You: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKc32jQIY0w (01:28 | if you're in a hurry). | cheradenine_uk wrote: | It's _exactly_ like that - and I've asked a fair few | questions on DIY forums and the answer is, invariably, "you | should hire someone to do that". | | It's even worse in the UK if you mention gas. If you so | much as mention a boiler you'll be pounced on by the cartel | inventing their own legislation. | jsmith99 wrote: | Does it let you file directly to Companies House? The forums | imply you have to hire an accountant to do that. | cheradenine_uk wrote: | You can go 2 ways, neither of which are hard. | | You can file your accounts (which are trivial for a micro | entity) directly with Companies house, or, when you do your | CT600 corporation tax return (which is the 6 or so numbers) | there's a checkbox marked "also file to companies house". | | You absolutely do not need an accountant. | | You also get a great deal of time (extra on your first | year) between year-end and when you have to submit, so | there is no panic. | riccardomc wrote: | I say: do it! | | I am also a freelance consultant but in the cloud infra space. | I appreciate the freedom it gives me and the insight on the | operations of running a business are invaluable. | | As a software engineering I always looked suspiciously at | accounting and finance, but I have to admit I've been wrong. I | discovered a practical and theoretical elegance that is very | pleasing for someone like me. | | I ended up enrolling in an MBA because I wanted to learn more | about the business side of things. I had a few courses about | corporate finance, valuation and accounting which filled many | gaps I had. | | I still don't trust myself running my own finances completely, | so I do pay an accountant to take care of the details. But I am | very happy I know financially what is what when deciding where | to take my little business. | | Knowledge is power, especially when it comes to finance. | m_ke wrote: | Yeah I got stuck running a startup solo and would lose a ton of | sleep stressing about any possible unknown unknowns on the | accounting and legal side, reading through a few business law | and accounting / bookkeeping books really helped ease that | stress. | goodlinks wrote: | Imho anyone working on business applications could do with | this. I get frustrated how naive so many software tools are | regarding fincial controls and how developers dont know that so | many data reconciliation issues were solved decades or | centuries ago by accountants. | | Same goes for basic infrastructure and configuration knowledge | to a certain extent:) | augiemagic wrote: | This sounds like something I'd be interested in learning more | about. Do you have a couple examples of said data | reconciliation issues, and the corresponding accounting | approaches? | jimnotgym wrote: | An easy example. In a well designed database that | represents an accounting ledger, debits are positive | numbers credits are negative. With double entry accounting, | if everything is correct the entire ledger sums to zero at | all times. It is trivial therefore to know if an error | crept in to your system, maybe something posted only half | the entry before erroring (btw always post a complete | double entry inside a database transaction). | cheradenine_uk wrote: | If you're interested, you can always check out the code | to GNUcash; | | IIRC it has a SQL Schema that can be imported into most | databases. | | https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/SQL | augiemagic wrote: | Ah that makes sense. Thanks! | dugmartin wrote: | You can also design your schema using unified ledger | accounting | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_ledger_accounting) | which captures both the transaction's debit and credit in | a single row in a single table negating the need for a | transaction. | jimnotgym wrote: | The problem comes with trying to quickly find the balance | of sub-accounts. It is common to need to find the balance | of all of the general ledger accounts repeatedly and | quickly when preparing accounts, or having to find all | customer balances to see who has paid. Once you have 10m | rows of data (easily done at an sme) this gets very slow | indeed. It is common to have a second table that records | running balances or balances at period ends to speed this | up. This is why transactions are important or you find | the individual accounts of the sales ledger control don't | add up to the total. Some systems have an 'audit' tool | that adds them all back up from the general ledger. | holri wrote: | Not the OP. But in my experience, a lot of people do not | know about double entry bookkeeping, which solves a lot of | problems people have trying a home made excel bookkeeping. | It is not more work to do, but you have to learn a little | bit about the concepts. Once you know them, it seems | incomprehensible that others make errors that have been | solved hundreds of years ago. | jermaustin1 wrote: | > and maybe stop paying an accountant to do my taxes | | My mother was an accountant for years, I learned a lot of | accounting, but there is a MASSIVE difference between knowing | how to basically bookkeep and the tax code. | | I'm in the US - so might be easier in less tax-lobbied | countries. | | When I started my second consulting firm (after closing down my | first when I took a "real job"), I initially tried to go at it | myself, but payroll is a complex process, so I decided to | outsource that. Cost me $20/mo, but saved me hours of work. | Then when the end of my first tax year hit, I started trying to | figure out how to do my corporate taxes myself. Downloaded all | of the tax forms I could find that I needed, and printed the | couple hundred pages of information. 4 weeks into filling out | the forms and 2 weeks before a filing deadline, I gave up. To | the best of my knowledge I had underpaid my quarterly estimates | by $30k. | | I reached out to a small business accountant (brother of a good | friend), and for only $1200, he handled the 112 page tax | return, found out I had only underpaid by less than $2000, also | found a whole bunch of write offs I didn't even know to look | for, and did a full reconciliation of my accounts for that. | | It was at this point that I decided I will always pay for | professionals to do the part of this job that I am not | proficient at. All of my various accounts-related services add | up to less than 1% of my revenue, and if it were even 5 or 10% | of my revenue, I'd probably still pay it, just to know it was | done correctly. | EvanAnderson wrote: | I took the 101/201-level accounting classes at a local | community college before my partners and I started our IT | support contracting business in 2004. (For me, instructor led | training is a preferable delivery vehicle, but the results | might well be the same if I enjoyed self-education for this | kind of thing.) | | The dividends paid by having basic accounting knowledge were | twofold. | | It definitely helped me run the business better-- particularly | when it came to working with the CPA who handles our taxes. It | also helped me in communicating the operation of the business | to the partners who have less of an accounting background. I've | ended-up doing all the bookkeeping for the business and I think | we've saved a ton of money versus hiring an accountant to do | that basic work. (We still hire-out for tax-related work | because I don't want to sink time into learning those | intricacies.) | | The other major benefit, and arguably a larger one than the | first, is giving me credibility when I talk to Customers' | finance and accounting people. Properly using the terminology | they're comfortable with to describe their business problems | feels like it has helped me land relationships and projects. | Obviously, I can't spin-up a "scratch universe" to test that | hypothesis, but I do know that I've seen tech-heavy and | accounting-light presentations by other vendors go over very | badly with some of the same people. | | Finally, I'd argue bookkeeping and accounting is, arguably, the | oldest "information technology" discipline in humanity. Much of | IT springs from the history of bookkeeping becoming | computerized ("automatic data processing"). I think knowing the | history of IT, be from the dawn of computer science birthing | from logic and mathematics, or the first practical applications | of IT to human problems, is valuable to its practitioners. | rrnn wrote: | I come from a family of accountants. But when I first went to | college I chose IT Management which included both IT and | Accounting subjects. I've worked on the IT Side for about a | decade. | | > The other major benefit, and arguably a larger one than the | first, is giving me credibility when I talk to Customers' | finance and accounting people. | | I also have benefited a lot from the accounting subjects I | took in college have also been an advantage in my | professional career as I can 'speak the language' of my | workplace's financial department. | | > Finally, I'd argue bookkeeping and accounting is, arguably, | the oldest "information technology" discipline in humanity. | So much of the discipline springs from the history of | bookkeeping becoming computerized ("automatic data | processing"). It's a good background to working in IT to know | about where it came from. | | - Definitely. The software used at my family's the accounting | office was older than any other I had used. This year I | helped them migrate from an MSDOS Fox Pro 2 application to a | newer app. | | The MS-DOS It worked well, it is even still supported by the | developer (!), but the work around required to make | everything work in a Win 10 environment was too much of a | hassle. | | It felt like doing digital archeology when opening files | created between 1989 and 1994 to see how data was stored. | Even this newer app still uses an older tech stack: Visual | Fox Pro 9. Accounting software seems to run in an alternate | timeline. | pkrotich wrote: | It's absolutely your best interest to learn at least the basics | as business owner. I did so myself - I still do QuickBooks, but | I have a cautionary tale. | | Learning account is great - it helps you to understand P&L and | BS etc - but what you really need is managerial accounting | knowledge. I made a mistake of thinking bookkeeping was | accounting and ended up not doing good tax planning etc - let's | just say I'm still paying for it. Painful lesson! | | I would highly recommend still keeping a CPA around - make sure | they're truly into Managerial Accounting. | mgkimsal wrote: | I've never been 'afraid' of numbers/finance as such, but | typically have operated on the smaller side of things enough | where it hasn't been too much of a burden. I've had multiple | financial folks in the family (accountants/cpas/cfos/etc) such | that when I've had questions, I have trusted people I've turned | to, which has been more than enough. | | About 10 years ago I brought on an outside accountant to handle | my small business stuff. They do the final 'paperwork', but | it's forced me to become a bit more diligent about financial | housekeeping stuff - documenting purchases, keeping tax forms, | etc. And I try to never let things go more than a few weeks | before reviewing (primarily expenses). Part of the 'dread' of | financial stuff was having to wade through a year's worth of | paperwork. Keep ahead of that and working with an external | accountant has made all this more of an annoyance than anything | else. | revskill wrote: | All of this could/should be replaced with coding. | | Why not illustrating concepts by some coding with a database ? | | It sucks, when those finance specialists have no idea on coding | to teach others, which left a hole on those sucking ERP software | to fill (but failed). | | Or, if you can't teach using programming, you still don't get it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-12-20 23:00 UTC)