[HN Gopher] Joan Didion has died ___________________________________________________________________ Joan Didion has died Author : chewymouse Score : 144 points Date : 2021-12-24 17:33 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com) | BruceEel wrote: | Pretty sure I'm singing to the choir here, but "Slouching Towards | Bethlehem", I literally cannot recommend it enough. | staplung wrote: | And of course, _At the Dam_ , one of my all time favorite pieces | of non-fiction | | http://deathray.us/no_crawl/others/atthedam.html | tyre wrote: | A rarely mentioned part of her work is the small book Salvador. | She wrote a fair amount on the horrors in Central America during | the 1980s, many of which were backed by the US government. | | It's a difficult, harrowing read. But as a student educated in | the United States well after these events happened, I never knew | this part of our history and the long-lasting repercussions. | 509engr wrote: | Her essay on California's water system is one of the most | beautiful pieces of writing about public works I have ever | encountered. | | http://archive.pov.org/thirst/holy-water/ | bspammer wrote: | There is something so strange about reading such a beautiful | thing and then reading that comment at the bottom. The | juxtaposition is just bizarre. Is there a word for this | feeling? It happens to me frequently online. | | Anyway, thank you for sharing. | jelling wrote: | Then you'd probably love "Powerbroker: Robert Moses and the | Death of New York" by Robert Caro. Long, but he's a master. | PaulHoule wrote: | _Political Fictions_ is my favorite Joan Didion book, | particularly her essay on _Insider Baseball_., which together | with Asimov's _Franchise_ anticipates 538 and all the other | media on elections that ultimately disenfranchise voters. | TomDavey wrote: | > anticipates 538 and all the other media on elections that | ultimately disenfranchise voters. | | Serious question: how does "media on elections" | disenfranchise voters? I would have thought that they | usefully inform voters, or at least remind voters of the | importance of voting. | biophysboy wrote: | They by no means have total control. People can still | think. The point is media also provides interpretation. | So, instead of going into a voting booth reflecting over | your own needs or principles, you go into the booth | thinking about polling and statistics. You vote for | somebody because their number is higher on 538. It gets | worse when you consider that the people being polled are | themselves thinking about who is most viable or likable. | noduerme wrote: | It could just as easily work the other way. e.g. all the | polling says Trump can't beat Hillary, so no one bothers | going out to vote for Hillary. | CalChris wrote: | In fact, Hillary won the popular vote by quite a lot, | 2.8M or more than 2% of the vote. | jdavis703 wrote: | There are some people that are suspicious of polling | averages and models have under-performed Trump vs. the | official vote totals. They think it's a form of | "suppression polling" where the opponents supporters are | demoralized by a conspiracy of weak polling numbers that | suppress turnout. | | I believe there are simpler and more convincing | explanations for polling errors that seemed consistently | biased against Trump, but some people are happy to jump | to far fetched conspiracy theories. | pessimizer wrote: | Why associate the comment you replied to with Trump, and | why is associating that comment to Trump enough to | dismiss criticism of publishing continuous polls as "far- | fetched conspiracy theories"? | | There have certainly been massive polling failures (and | obvious push polling) in elections over the past decade | that can be discussed rather than being dismissed for the | sake of partisanship. The organizations who actually do | the polling discuss these issues constantly without | accusing each other of being deluded. | VictorPath wrote: | One counter-vailing fact is Republican internal polls | showed Trump losing up until election night in 2016. | Polls they did for themselves, which they did not share | at the time, showed him losing. | | Aside from this, to influence opinions with sharing | polling information, one just needs to change the | question, or the audience, or both. "Should the US seek | peaceful resolutions with Russia" will get a different | answer than "Should Biden oppose Russia's military | buildup on Ukraine's border". You can tailor the question | to the answer, and have Americans either supporting or | opposing abortion, or whatever. | | Also, a poll of everyone will yield different results | from a poll of, say, likely voters. You have to look to | who is polled along with what is polled. | | With these things done, there is little need to fudge the | numbers, other polling organizations can ask the same | question to the same demographic and get similar answers. | noduerme wrote: | I think the simplest explanation is that pollsters are | from the media/elite; when Trumpers get a phone call from | a pollster, it's either their chance to "own the libs" by | lying, or they're embarrassed to admit their reactionary | beliefs so they say what they think a centrist or liberal | would say. Then they vote for the furthest right wing | loonies they can find. | | You can see this kind of thing in practice if you've ever | been a non-white person in a redneck bar. | PaulHoule wrote: | Go read the sources I point to. | | In the case of _Franchise_ a computer does an interview | of one voter and then calculates who the president should | be. | | In real life, if _538_ was perfect at simulating the | election there would be no need to have the election. | | The point of _Insider Baseball_ is that 'horse-race' | coverage and coverage that pretends to give you an | insider view of the campaign as the candidates and their | staff see it completely avoid any real discussion of who | the voters are, what they really want, what really | motivates them, what alternatives they really have, etc. | | _538_ in perfect irony applies the techniques and | terminology of sports betting to politics. | noduerme wrote: | The funny thing is, they're just as often wrong with | their sports predictions. No serious sports wagerer I | know would ever rely on 538 to make their picks. Gamblers | understand that touts serve two masters. Apparently, | punters are less gullible than political pundits when it | comes to believing that a set of chosen stats represents | a neutral, scientific prediction. | georgeecollins wrote: | Predictions are hard, particularly about the future. | raegis wrote: | The book Cadillac Desert and the documentary of the same name | (narrated by Alfre Woodard) woke me up to this problem. (I live | in CA but grew up back east). It's astonishing that we use so | much imported water on our lawns (including during Winter) | while watering lawns is not even necessary elsewhere. | 0x0nyandesu wrote: | I find it funny that a farm in the valley has "water use | rights" and will end up using millions of gallons of water | per month and pay almost nothing for it meanwhile my sfm | which uses about 15k gallons a month will cost $300 for the | privilege and I'm allowed to keep going and water outside as | much as I want however California regulations prevent me from | installing a second shower head in my walk in shower wet room | under the guise of not wasting water. | | All this even though the place where I live is basically 97% | recycled water so you're really just paying for the cost of | treating the water. | | Eh I generally don't understand why my property has to stay a | dessert while 10 minutes from my house the farms take the | water and sell it for themselves in the fruit. | leesalminen wrote: | 15k gallons per month?!? >7k/mo where I live in Colorado | would result in a 4-digit bill and a nasty gram to boot. | randycupertino wrote: | If you liked Cadillac Desert you might enjoy reading A | Kingdom from Dust, a long-form article in California Sunday | magazine that details the Resnick family behind Pom | pomegranate products and their lobbying for water rights in | Kern county: https://story.californiasunday.com/resnick-a- | kingdom-from-du... | 509engr wrote: | Mark Arax, the author of that article has a longer book, A | Dreamt Land, on the subject of California agriculture and | water, (probably the article is an excerpt) that is a | really good read too. A little more up-to-date than | Cadillac Desert, and more focused on California and the | Central Valley. | justinpage wrote: | Thank you for sharing this! | rurban wrote: | The documentary about her, by her nephew, is still on Netflix. I | just watched it. It's excellent. Initially I was a bit sceptical, | because I only knew her A+ screenwriting and her lifestyle | reporting, but she was a great one. | Quarrel wrote: | For those looking, it is: | | Joan Didion: The Center Will Not Hold | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Didion:_The_Center_Will_N... | | 89% on RT. So pretty fkn good. | neonate wrote: | https://archive.ph/RcFKd | | http://web.archive.org/web/20211224011509/https://www.nytime... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-12-24 23:00 UTC)