[HN Gopher] cal 9 1752
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       cal 9 1752
        
       Author : susam
       Score  : 49 points
       Date   : 2021-12-24 17:43 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (susam.in)
 (TXT) w3m dump (susam.in)
        
       | bahmboo wrote:
       | You think that's bad?                 The year -45 has been
       | called the "year of confusion," because in that year Julius
       | Caesar inserted 90 days to bring the months of the Roman calendar
       | back to their       traditional place with respect to the
       | seasons.
       | 
       | Even if you don't explicitly deal with historical calendars it is
       | important to understand calendaring in many software engineering
       | areas.
       | 
       | https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/calendars.html
        
         | ithkuil wrote:
         | And he was in part responsible for the mess since he assumed
         | the role of Pontefix Maximus but was away from Rome to wage war
         | left and right and didn't fulfil his yearly duties of syncing
         | the calendar.
         | 
         | The role of the Pontefix Maximus was to insert intercalar
         | months to sync the calendar to seasons.
         | 
         | With the reform he basically automated himself out of the job.
        
       | natas wrote:
       | September 1752       Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa              1  2 14 15
       | 16       17 18 19 20 21 22 23       24 25 26 27 28 29 30
       | 
       | why why why why why why
        
         | SAI_Peregrinus wrote:
         | Shift from Julian calendar to Gregorian. Easter wasn't at the
         | right date any more due to the Earth's precession, so the
         | Catholic church changed the calendar.
         | 
         | Different countries changed at different times. Quite a bit of
         | Europe did the switch in October of 1582 when Pope Gregory
         | instituted the new calendar, and skipped 10 days. England
         | waited until 1752, by then the Earth had precessed enough that
         | another day had to be skipped.
        
           | giva wrote:
           | Russia did it in 1918. For this reason, the "October
           | revolution" happened in November.
        
             | nradov wrote:
             | The Serbian Orthodox Church still hasn't done it.
             | Eventually they'll have Christmas in July.
        
       | giva wrote:
       | Iirc, the minimum value for a datetime type in SQL server used to
       | be 1/1/1753, for the same reason.
        
       | beermonster wrote:
       | Oh this brings back memories. I used to enjoy performing demos of
       | cal for that month/year.
        
       | usui wrote:
       | Just wondering, is it possible to have a calendar system that
       | automatically adjusts to the Earth's orbit around the sun
       | dynamically with a precision/accuracy as high as possible? I
       | imagine the calendar would need to note how long that calendar
       | year was, how long a day was, and to what precision it is
       | recorded.
       | 
       | It would be interesting if systems never had to account for a
       | leap day every n years. I suppose 0.003% of a day (the error rate
       | each year) each year isn't a big enough concern, otherwise known
       | as 2.592 seconds.
        
         | trasz wrote:
         | Please no. Trying to sync time to Earth rotation is why we have
         | leap seconds, and they are pretty much universally hated.
         | 
         | (They are hated, because AFAIK they are unpredictable, which
         | also answers your question, assuming you were asking about
         | purely algorithmic/mathematical way without any outside
         | inputs.)
        
         | noah_buddy wrote:
         | I do like the idea of variable length 'true' days as a more
         | exact measure of the world around us but the thought terrifies
         | me as a programmer (or even someone who needs to get practical
         | things done). It's so much easier to reason about time in
         | standard units even if they're wrong. Now if we were to
         | eliminate day light savings, that would be a greatly
         | appreciated change.
        
           | gumby wrote:
           | There's precedent: the Babylonian day was 12 hours long; the
           | night likewise. They knew sunrise and sunset so could set a
           | given day's hour to be 1/12th of that (and night's).
           | 
           | They clearly knew the extreme cases (the solstices and
           | equinoxes) but I don't know if they actually adjusted each
           | day; I don't know how they actually market the hours, much
           | less why they would bother.
           | 
           | Even the "minute" (small part) and "second" (the second
           | division) were measured only due to the development of
           | technology that allowed it.
        
             | hashimotonomora wrote:
             | To clarify, daylight was divided in 12 periods of equal
             | length called "hours", as well as nighttime. This length
             | depended on the day of the year, when measured with the
             | current definition of hour. 24 hours was always a complete
             | day.
        
       | timepolice007 wrote:
       | This just illustrates how important it is that we take care of
       | our environment. Travelers think they can just pollule whatever,
       | but that pollution does have very serious adverse affects. Tens
       | of thousands of people just pop out of existance when a major
       | temporal restructing like this happens. The whole correcting
       | calenders handwavium, while preventing mass awakening, will never
       | undo that tremendous loss of life from one careless adventurer.
        
       | woodruffw wrote:
       | I also ran across this a couple of years ago[1], and there's a
       | cool twist to it for different regions (which adjusted their own
       | calendars on different years): `ncal` correctly handles the skip
       | differently for the UK:                   $ ncal -s GB 9 1752
       | September 1752         Mo    18 25         Tu  1 19 26         We
       | 2 20 27         Th 14 21 28         Fr 15 22 29         Sa 16 23
       | 30         Su 17 24
       | 
       | [1]: https://blog.yossarian.net/2015/06/09/Dates-That-Dont-Exist
        
       | bodyfour wrote:
       | I distinctly remember being shown this ~35 years ago when I was
       | first shown UNIX as a demonstration of how high-quality the
       | commands were implemented... even something as weird as the
       | calendar changeover was accounted for.
       | 
       | And, yes, it exists even in the earliest versions of the "cal"
       | command, dating back to the mid 1970s:
       | https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo/blob/Researc...
       | 
       | The implementation is pretty clever as well. The jan1() function
       | simply returns the day-of-week the year starts on (and knows
       | about the calendar-system change). The cal() function compares
       | jan1(y) and jan1(y+1) to detect leap years by noticing if the
       | weekday of Jan 1st advances one or two days.. and if it's
       | anything else it assumes it's handling the 1752 case. Then inside
       | of the printing loop it just jumps from 2 to 14 whenever it is
       | rendering a month that happens to contain 19 days.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-24 23:00 UTC)