[HN Gopher] Tumblr has added more strict tag filtering for their... ___________________________________________________________________ Tumblr has added more strict tag filtering for their iOS app Author : tosh Score : 45 points Date : 2021-12-26 16:51 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (twitter.com) (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com) | smoldesu wrote: | Man, Apple's review process is getting to pretty incomprehensible | heights. Certain people will have their apps rejected carte- | blanche, while other developers get to... collaborate with the | reviewers to blacklist objectionable content in their app? I | really don't follow how a dialogue like this even starts in the | first place, much less how nobody has stepped forwards and just | acknowledged that this is a double-standard yet. | | The App Store desperately needs transparency if it wants to avoid | regulatory ire. Stories like this are just getting ridiculous. | judge2020 wrote: | I doubt regulators will care about the adult content moderation | policy of all things, outside of enforcing stricter age checks. | markx2 wrote: | I very much doubt this is due to Apple. | | Automattic bought tumblr to make money. They can't make the money | they want unless they make tumblr more advertising friendly, and | that means slowly but surely eliminating - basically non-Google | friendly - content. | | Eliminate tags, sites using those tags their traffic goes down, | they move elsewhere. | | tumblr looks pure and wholesome. | | That's the plan. | noahtallen wrote: | One thing I've never been sure of is how Reddit has been so | successful with NSFW content. It's certainly not banned from | the platform, so how is it able to get away with it compared to | the other services? It's also mostly an ad business, right? | Whereas other as businesses like YouTube have historically been | very prudish (swearing can demonetize a video and nsfw content | isn't allowed) | jelling wrote: | Reddits revenue per user is terrible compared to Facebook | ($0.30 vs $7): | | https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/11/reddit-users-are-the- | least-v... | forgotmyoldname wrote: | I really don't get why big companies buying ads are | apparently morally trapped in 1950. | | Nobody who was actually going to buy your product is going to | care if it appears alongside someone saying "oh shit! Cool!" | But we consistently get policies that punish people just for | saying simple words, like YouTube apparently demonetizing | anything with "foul language" in the titles/first minute or | so of the video. | | Most people also won't care if a portion of the website has | boobs or something. 99.999% of people won't decide to never | again purchase your soda because it advertised on a site that | had a bare nipple on a certain subsection of that site. But | policies are enforced like this is true, and it ends up | killing platforms once they reach a size mainstream enough to | sell fast food and soda ads. | markx2 wrote: | I have no knowledge of how Reddit handles NSFW content. I | have some knowledge of how Automattic does. | | From what I have seen as an active reddit user of 10yrs+, the | ads I see on - for example - /r/culinaryskills, /r/gamedeals, | /r/dogs - are quite different. They are targeted in some way. | | All WordPress.com sites - and I assume tumblr sites - could | have ads shown. One way to stop ads being shown on those | sites is to apply a tag. | | Call that tag "mature" | | A site tagged as "mature" will | | - not appear to other sites | | - will therefore experience a drop-off in traffic | | - but will still appear in Google but because of the lack of | linking will be much much lower in results. | | Reddit cannot add those tags as fast and (maybe) as | accurately as a blogging service can so it gets away with it. | That said, they do have the ability to quarantine sites and I | have no idea at all if they hide NSFW content from crawlers. | riantogo wrote: | So you are saying there appears to be a way (likely | nontrivial) that Tumblr could adopt (maybe same as reddit) | to keep both advertisers and community happy? | markx2 wrote: | No. | | A subreddit could, depending on it's (unpaid) mods have a | wide variety of content. For example /r/WTF content could | be funny or shocking. An advertiser on that sub would | have to be okay with their content being alongside either | content. | | Let's say a tumblr site gets tagged as "mature". | | That site does not get the expected ads normally seen on | a site | | That site is effectively invisible to other sites | | Why would you buy ads on a site that no-one will see? | | Why would you stay publishing on a site where your | traffic falls of a cliff? | | What makes a site get that 'mature' tag? It could be one | post, it could be a series of posts. But that tag stays | until it manually removed. | | When you are running a site that has user generated | content there are two alternatives: | | - Being clean | | - Being seen to be clean | | Tag filtering helps the latter. | dvt wrote: | If you look at it from a cynical standpoint, what's happening is | completely obvious. Apple is applying the full force of their | developer policy -- and the pressure is mounting -- because | Tumblr has absolutely zero social capital. It's a dead platform, | and other than a few zealots, just about everyone's moved on. | | Contrast this with Epic v. Apple: Epic has the arguable upper | hand there (and Apple's flinched a few times already) because | Fortnite is a massively popular game with a huge fanbase. | whateveracct wrote: | casting tumblr users of 2021 as zealots is hilariously out of | touch | | it's a plenty vibrant platform - all of the other social media | websites are way worse, content-wise. Create a tumblr account & | follow tags/accounts related to your interests. You'll get a | lot of quality content! | | For example, there's a reason the witcher season 2's media | campaign included an AMA on tumblr with one of the stars. | That's where the fandom thrives. | | it just isn't an especially monetizable bunch of communities. | Fandom in general is hard to monetize (look at the donation- | driven AO3 for another community-hub more vibrant than the ones | twitter and facebook can manage.) | markx2 wrote: | It is nothing to do with Apple. | | That is a distraction. | | It is all about advertising. | LordDragonfang wrote: | I mean tumblr is a dead platform _because_ of Apple applying | the full force of its developer policies. It lost Three | quarters of its active users in the span of a few months after | the 2018 porn ban fiasco (which majorly affected sfw artists as | well because the rollout was so botched) which the OP explains | Apple 's hand in. | lsiebert wrote: | Yeah, my understanding was that apple cracking down was | merely the excuse Verizon, which owned tumblr at the time, | used to justify banning porn, but it was about ad revenue. | | Twitter certainly has plenty of porn. | Animats wrote: | The list of bad words: | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YG7E84Dvs2PyoKMgSgZFgEX0... | | This is the trouble with online censorship. It gets totally out | of control very fast. | judge2020 wrote: | If "submission" is added automatically, why would it be used for | BDSM content when so much of the content in search results would | be off-topic? | kingcharles wrote: | I wonder if this is the reason my gf's (reasonably popular) | account was terminated out of the blue. It certainly contains a | number of the banned tags. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-12-26 23:00 UTC)