[HN Gopher] Down the Rabbit Hole: The world of estranged parents... ___________________________________________________________________ Down the Rabbit Hole: The world of estranged parents' forums (2015) Author : jasonhansel Score : 115 points Date : 2021-12-28 19:45 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.issendai.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.issendai.com) | MeinBlutIstBlau wrote: | I believe there was a reddit thread one time about some family in | New York that cut ties from their parents or grandparents, and | due to some age old Kinship law, the elders could take children | to court for not allowing them to see grandchildren or something | of the like. | | It's fascinating in the US that we've gotten to the point that | families can break contact entirely and be successful but due to | completely out of date institutions baked in to law, we're stuck | with arbitrary reasons to engage with hostile people. As a judge, | why would you ever grant rights of a grandparent willing to take | their children to court to see their grand children short of an | abuse related situation? | HWR_14 wrote: | This doesn't sound like some misinterpreted archaic law. It | sounds like the law prevented exactly what the drafters | intended - parents cutting grandparents off from children. | Whether that's a stupid law is another question. | [deleted] | teraflop wrote: | The article touches on this: | | > Grandparents' rights groups are one step forward and one | step back. One step forward, because the majority of the | people who are interested in this cause are the people | grandparents' rights were meant to help: grandparents who | lost touch with their grandchildren through the parents' | divorce, incarceration, or some other rupture in their | children's families. However, it also brings out the people | who think they have more rights over their grandchildren than | the children's own parents do, the people who want to force a | family reconciliation through the courts, the people who want | to take custody of their grandchildren to punish their | children. | aidenn0 wrote: | > . If a person's own writing shows that they lie, rewrite | reality, or otherwise engage in cognitive distortions, they're | abusive. Period. Instant kill shot. | | If you haven't dealt with someone with NPD or BPD, I'd like to | clarify this a bit. I'm sure that any of the prolific commenters | on HN could be found to have contradicted themselves and/or | distorted reality occasionally. This is about patterns of | behavior, and it's usually coupled with minimizing any specific | examples of the behavior while never engaging with the fact that | the problem is the pattern of behavior, not any one example. | | I've dealt with someone with eBPD who was unable to get through a | 45 minute therapy session without contradicting themselves. They | also habitually selectively report facts to distort reality[1]. | If the estranged kid(s) really were the ones with personality | disorders, I suspect the emotional responses to being cut out | would be something along the lines of "Sad, relieved, guilty | about feeling relieved." | | 1: Here's an example with details changed: "Joe drank too much | last night and we got in a car crash." Reality, Joe was in the | passenger seat, and the driver hit a deer that jumped out in | front of them. On confrontation: "I never said Joe drove drunk!" | michaelbuckbee wrote: | Also, from context, I believe that's really focused on | observable patterns in the forum. If someone is lying and | contradicting themselves so plainly on the forum (with | relatively low stakes) it's quite likely that they do so | elsewhere. | fragbait65 wrote: | Is that actually a good example of what you mean? There is no | contradiction? The first statement does not say that Joe drove | drunk? | tptacek wrote: | Obviously, it strongly implies that Joe drove drunk. That's | the point of the hypothetical. | citizenkeen wrote: | Playing on people's inferences (which is different from | implying) is a common tactic of the abusive. | tshaddox wrote: | That's also just what "lying" means. If you make a claim | with the intention of deceiving someone that claim is a | lie. It's not like English is a formal language where you | can say "ah but my statement technically passed the 'Truth | compiler' so it's not technically a lie." | mthoms wrote: | Similarly, I like to say something along the lines of | "lies by omission are still lies". | bena wrote: | This one is more "distorted reality" rather than a | contradiction. | | They present information in a way to get you to assume things | that aren't true to either paint their desired victim in a | bad light or them in a good light. And when presented with | clarifying data, will try to act like its your fault that you | misinterpreted what they said. Even though it's what they | wanted. | | One tell is someone who seems to collect bad relationships. | Who has a never-ending stream of stories of people just being | awful to them. And their only admission of having done | anything wrong is just some sort of vague platitude. It's | always of the variety "I'm not perfect either" never "I | shouldn't have cheated". | kempbellt wrote: | > 1: Here's an example with details changed: "Joe drank too | much last night and we got in a car crash." Reality, Joe was in | the passenger seat, and the driver hit a deer that jumped out | in front of them. On confrontation: "I never said Joe drove | drunk!" | | Continued: | | "It was Joe's birthday he got a bit tipsy. He was feeling a bit | full of himself and hit on my girlfriend all night. Afterwards | I _still_ decide to drive him home so he didn 't die. I mean, | what kind of friend would let his friend drive himself home | after drinking _on his birthday_? And even then he continued to | be a complete ass. I was so enraged that I didn 't even see the | deer jump out in front of my car" | | Hence: "Joe drank too much last night and we got in a car | crash" could very well be a valid interpretation of the evening | if you consider all possible context. Especially if you are | trying not to throw Joe under the bus as a sleazy friend to | your therapist. | | But also, it _could_ definitely be the drivers fault in this | hypothetical scenario. Hard to say. | | The problem here is that humans have a tendency to believe they | have all the information they need to pass correct judgment | (source: life experience, and if I'm wrong about this, that | means I'm probably right, right?). Usually, they don't. In my | experience, everyone embroiders details to make themselves look | innocent, and often without even noticing. It's very difficult | to parse truth from people's tendency to simplify and | exaggerate based on personal bias. | | If there is a conflict there usually _is_ a good reason - but | sometimes that "good reason" is based on a misinterpretation | that others won't understand. | | I can't place fault on Joe _or_ the driver in this situation | because: I wasn 't there and I don't know all of the context. | tptacek wrote: | The comment you're responding to starts by saying these | aren't the actual details; they're trying to illustrate a | pattern of abusive arguments that provide misleading | narratives, and, when contradicted by evidence, proceed to | lawyer out from under the deception. That's obviously a real | phenomenon; the example is just meant as an illustration of | it. I'm not sure what the point of litigating it is. | kempbellt wrote: | It's completely hypothetical, so the narrative is whatever | we make it to be. | | My comment is in response to the therapists POV in this | context. OP used the term: "On confrontation". | | Why is there confrontation at all? Why not simply ask for | elaboration while withholding judgement? Maybe the person | you are providing therapy to is still worked up from the | events and unable to explain things clearly. | | That is the point of litigating. | tptacek wrote: | If that comment had just used the abstract pattern: "(1) | Abuser provides an overtly misleading narrative; (2) | Abuser is confronted with evidence that contradicts the | thrust of their narrative; (3) Abuser retreats to | litigating the clear meaning of their original | narrative", would you still see a point in trying to | provide counterfactuals? The comment is simply trying to | illustrate a pattern common to unproductive and/or | abusive arguments; they not really offering you a law | school hypo to work through. | kempbellt wrote: | 1) Why is a therapist qualifying a narrative as | misleading, or not? Is this productive therapy? | | 2) Why would a therapist confront a patient like this? Is | the point of good therapy to say, "Ahah! You contradicted | yourself. My diagnosis that you are eBPD is correct!" | | 3) Seems like the patient being qualified as an abuser | and confronted by a person who's role is to help them, in | this manner, would naturally retreat to a defensive | posture. | | So no, I don't see the point in trying to provide | counterfactuals. Doesn't feel like productive therapy. | | A good therapist is there to listen, without judgement. | | Just my 2 cents tho. Obviously, feel free to disagree. | bena wrote: | The point is that you're arguing the metaphor rather than | the point of the metaphor. | | Your additions are bullshit. They add nothing but to | somehow point at the poster and go "ah-ha". Because | you're really just making the same point as the poster: | Important details that change the story can be left out. | | It doesn't matter which party in the hypothetical | scenario is actually correct, only that one of them is | not because they left out significant details. | [deleted] | Thin_icE wrote: | Thank you for posting this. It was really helpful, and it's very | comforting to know I'm not crazy, or imagining things in my head. | gkoberger wrote: | My favorite article from this site is The Missing Missing | Reasons: | | http://www.issendai.com/psychology/estrangement/missing-miss... | golemotron wrote: | It's very concerning how quickly people throw around medical | terms like NPD or BPD. The blog seems anonymous so there is no | indication of whether the person who wrote it is qualified to | diagnose. My guess is no because there are many blanket | statements and few qualifying statements. People without training | are likely to read about a few characteristics and, well, you see | what you look for. | noodles_nomore wrote: | I upvoted this comment, since it's important to retain a | skeptical perspective, anywhere. Reading psychology is very | liberating as it can be an immense help in understanding your | personal experiences, but it can also become a vessel for | projecting your preconceptions on those around you. Labeling | others with mental disorders is also a way to dehumanize them | and certainly not a healthy way to engage with the world. In | the end, psychological labels are just shortcuts that help | pattern the world in the absence of real understanding. | TameAntelope wrote: | I'm confused about where you see a diagnosis as being relevant | to the discussion. | PaulHoule wrote: | "Narcissism" is generally thrown around as an insult and it | has a confused history in the psychology literature going | back to Freud using it in two different ways that were both | confused and undeveloped. | | "Narcissism" essentially means "self-love" and it is | something that is part of everyone's psyche. Having something | wrong with your narcissism is like having something wrong | with your heart and there are many things that can go wrong | with your heart such as heart disease, heart failure, bad | valves, arrhythmia, heart attack, etc. In the middle of _Neon | Genesis Evangelion_ , Asuka Langley Soryu makes a passionate | defense of self-love ("you are all you've got!") | | There is "narcissistic personality disorder" as well as the | (widespread) narcissistic disturbance that Kohut talks about | which itself is more or less complicated by borderline and | other disturbances at more archaic levels. | | It is all front of mind for me right now because I was | talking to my therapist and volunteered that I was concerned | about an incident of "Dark Triad" behavior on my part and she | said at one point I was "talking like a Narcissist" (I | agreed) yet when I took a | | https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/SD3/ | | I found I was midrange on Machiavellianism, below average on | "narcissism" and close to the bottom of the range on | psychopathy. (Hmmm... I felt remorse about what I did so I | guess I'm not psychopathic.) | | I read this book cover-to-cover the next week | | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1171657.Humanizing_the_N. | .. | | and marked it up with a highlighter and drew my version of | Kohut's horizontal and vertical split on my whiteboard. I | oscillate between grandiosity and worthlessness sometimes and | definitely can point to merger, twinship, and mirror | transferences. (It was twinship transferences on two people | that got out of hand...) | | I'd point to at least some of this phenomenology being | widespread and almost normal... I think almost anytime | somebody blows up for what seems like no good reason there is | a grandiosity -> worthlessness transition going on. | golemotron wrote: | "The narcissists I see online don't write about their | relationships with their children and close friends; they | hardly write about their own partners, except as props in the | narcissist's ongoing drama." | | The writer seems very confident of their assessment of | various people online. | TameAntelope wrote: | So? Swap "narcissists" with "people who exhibit some | specific shared traits between one another that are also | often described as part of the diagnostic criteria of a | narcissist" and you get the same effect. | | It's a shortcut, not a diagnosis. Layperson English tends | to be that way, and getting caught up on the different | definitions between medicine and "common" speak is likely a | waste of time. | dwringer wrote: | Informal diagnoses can be useful as hypotheses to present to | qualified practitioners, and may even help in cases like | those at the linked site to give the affected parties peace | of mind and a feeling of insight, but I believe there is | something unscientific about labeling people with medical | disorders without the qualifications to do so. IMO such | diagnoses should always at least be taken with a grain of | salt. How relevant that is to this particular discussion is | certainly open to interpretation. | fmajid wrote: | I'm sure this is true in many, or even most cases, but there are | also cases where the grandparents do have the grandchild's best | interest at heart. Obviously those grandparents would not be on | some forum where they get to expound on their sense of | entitlement. Here in the UK, in the last month alone we've had | the horrific cases of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes, 6 or Star Hobson, | 1.5, both viciously murdered by their parent's partner with the | parent's full complicity. In both cases the grandparents alerted | social workers but were brushed off, with tragic results. | tptacek wrote: | This series of articles spends a lot of time and energy | differentiating ordinary estranged parents and grandparents | from those who spend time campaigning on forums for estranged | parents, and expands on a bunch of concerning reasons why | parents can become estranged through no fault of their own; for | instance, children can fall into drug addictions. It goes on to | make the point that these forums seem to be actively alienating | to those kinds of parents, who presumably seek support from | forums dedicated to parents estranged due to addiction. | | The thru-line for the whole series is that participation in | these forums is a powerful clue, all on its own, that abusive | behavior is involved in the estrangement. | fmajid wrote: | I understand, hence my caveat that the grandparents were not | on those forums. What I worry about is when the undeniable | existence of abusive grandparents is assumed by CPS or social | workers as a universal and cause valid warnings to be | overlooked. | tptacek wrote: | Another thing the articles repeatedly observe is the | proclivity of parents on these forums to abuse these shared | concerns about valid warnings in order to weaponize CPS and | social workers against their estranged children. Examples | include instances where the parents admit publicly that | they lied to CPS in attempts to punish and control their | own children. | mrxd wrote: | This mostly comes down to parents who have more traditional | cultural values than their children. It's like watching two | sports teams argue about who broke the rules, but they can't | agree because fundamentally one team is playing soccer and the | other is playing baseball. | throwawayHN378 wrote: | I didn't read the article. However, personal anecdote, my | girlfriend was a victim of parental alienation. She had a child | at 18 and everyone in her life conspired against her to separate | her from her child. Her mom tried to separate us. She would pull | me aside and tell me her daughter ( my girlfriend ) was a | narcissist, etc. I knew she wasn't. She is a loving, caring | person who cares deeply for her son. She was undiagnosed high | functioning autistic and no one took any time trying to figure | out how to interact with her. | | If it wasn't for the fact that my salary affords us the ability | to adequately represent ourselves in court she would have lost | all rights to her son. | saul_goodman wrote: | /r/justnomil | mjfl wrote: | amanaplanacanal wrote: | Ok. My parents never abused me. Just so you could hear the | other side. | | I've heard too many horrifying stories of parents abusing their | children, typically many decades later. Fuck those parents. Cut | them off. You will only be happier for it. | vorpalhex wrote: | Well people don't usually spend hours on forums talking about | how great childhood was. | tpmx wrote: | Especially on Reddit. Seems like there's an epidemic of self- | diagnosed "raised by narcissists" kids/young adults there. | 77pt77 wrote: | Or maybe the ones that didn't have problems don't feel the | need to share. | | Man bites dog vs dog bites man. | | Your perception of frequency is not an unbiased estimator of | actual frequency. | clusterfish wrote: | The "epidemic" is in the real world, you're only noticing it | now because now it's in your face on the internet. Must be | shocking to see that, if like most people you had normal | parents, but those mad asshole parents are sadly very real. | bisby wrote: | The raised by narcissists sub has 750k subscribers. Reddit | has ~500m monthly active users. That's 0.15% of reddit. If | 0.1% of people actually are raised by narcissists, that is an | accurate number.... 750k people in a single place is a LOT, | but it might still be representative. so yeas, it seems like | there is an "epidemic" but it's more about "if all the people | raised by narcissists were to be grouped in a single place it | would be a lot of people". That's just a testament to how the | internet brings groups of people together. | | If you had a great childhood with great parents. Good for | you. Not everyone has. and I don't think that 0.1% of reddit | is some sort of epidemic. | leejoramo wrote: | Issendai's writing about how to get out of "sick systems" | profoundly changed my life. If you are trapped in a job or | relationship and feel too overwhelmed to get out read these: | | http://www.issendai.com/psychology/sick-systems.html | | http://www.issendai.com/psychology/sick-systems-whittling-yo... | | http://www.issendai.com/psychology/sick-systems-qualities-th... | caslon wrote: | This series of articles is... really something I've been needing | to hear for a while, despite rationally having already accepted | the things inside of it. Thanks for posting it here, Jason. | [deleted] | [deleted] | resoluteteeth wrote: | Title should say 2015 | 77pt77 wrote: | No because it's irrelevant here. | ilamont wrote: | For people who have narcissistic/BPD family members/SOs, Issendai | provided a link to the the following forum: | | https://www.outofthefog.net/forum/index.php | cleandreams wrote: | I have half siblings like this, who tried to take the family | house from me after my father (their stepfather) died. That is, | they tried to take my share of it; the will split everything | equally. We split the family things up into thirds and they were | caught trying to steal from my share. Crazy making it was. So | much gas lighting. We are now estranged. TBH even seeing their | picture upsets me. | [deleted] | crookshanked wrote: | This is definitely something I could see myself being concerned | about happening. Any advice RE: lawyers/how to handle the | siblings trying to bypass the will? I've been told a living | trust is something to consider. Thoughts? | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | Get yourself named as executor of your parents' estate. That | is spelled out in a will. If they don't have will, get one | written with you as executor. | | The executor is the one responsible for distributing assets | (including real estate and anything of value) from the | estate. You want that role. | mindslight wrote: | Ideally you want a Durable Power of Attorney as well, which | gives you power when they're living. Both for being able to | take care of them, and as a trump card in case someone else | does try to influence them to sign a new Will you can | question their mental competence without ending up in a | world of hurt regarding conservatorship etc. | | From my understanding a Living Trust is really just a way | of bypassing the Will and probate process, and actually | allows for less oversight. This might make things easier, | or it might make it harder to get justice. | | There are also irrevocable trusts that allow for making | designations that can't be taken back, which perhaps may | fit your situation. But since they're irrevocable they need | to be drafted more carefully. | | Of course if they're not looking to you to fulfill such a | role or discuss such things, then perhaps it's not your | scene no matter how much you think it is. Whatever the case | is, you're better off having these conversations sooner | rather than too late. | | IME a parent's death is when all those unresolved childhood | disagreements come back to roost. | bena wrote: | Something similar happened when my grandfather died. My | father was the executor. The family thought the estate was | much larger than it was. There were lawyers, lawsuits, | attempts at extortion, at least one attempt at entrapping my | father into striking one of them, and probably some other | bullshit I was not aware of. | | My grandparents had pretty much everything divided and handed | out before they died. Two of them were living on property/in | houses that were given to them by my grandparents. After | funeral expenses, hospital bills, and everything else, there | really wasn't much left. | | If you want some real advice: Don't count on it. Set yourself | up in a way that you aren't waiting for your parents to die. | Have absolutely no stake in the outcome. And if you are the | executor, be as open and transparent as possible. If | anything, it'll make the lawsuits quicker. | Pixeleen wrote: | I suspect that we are at an inflection point in history, and the | United States has the factors for perfect storm. Traditional | gender values meeting the pill, and Baby Boomers (the "me" | generation) grappling for a last bit of control, while more | progressive generations come of age. I also think that Boomers' | drinking culture is relevant, as alcoholism and narcissism are | correlated. | | Being trans and the family scapegoat, I personally got out town | as soon as I could, but that was not the end of the story. My | narcissistic, abusive family conjured up a special blend of | threats, saccharine and passive-aggressive letters, stalking | involving the media, and misgendering/deadnaming/outing me in the | will when they did croak. | jollybean wrote: | This recent populist boomer bigotry is too much. | | The boomers represent the biggest social change of any | generation in centuries. The pill rock and roll women in the | workplace divorce MLK JFK Malcom X etc. | | Everything past them is an echo and Im not even sure it's on | the right side of history. | | Churchill drank 12 ounces a day that was normal before boomers. | They are not heavy drinkers historically speaking. | | And they did not have access to material goods like we do. | | The ME generation is every generation from here on in so long | as consumerism expands. | Pixeleen wrote: | Point taken... I am limited to my own context which was not | positive. I do feel like the younger generations are more | willing to be self-critical and change. Boomers seem to have | a lot of anger about the new. | testfoobar wrote: | This is a fascinating post to get some perspective from the | narcissist side. | | In my experience, beyond the suffering and abuse, it is nearly | impossible to describe to someone else the experience of extended | engagement with someone with narcissistic personality disorder or | someone with borderline personality disorder. Friends and family | often have no frame of reference in dealing with NPD or BPD. It | makes finding help and treatment much harder. Often you have to | discover on your own that you have been the target of NPD or BPD | abuse. It takes time. | Neil44 wrote: | Yep. You try and explain the arguments or situations, but in | peoples minds they apply the model of a normal person that they | have in their head to the narc because they look at the narc | and see a normal person, and they think well you just explain | this to them or just say that to them. They don't understand | that their mental models of how someone will behave and what | they will feel and say and do are not applicable to the | situation, and that trying to apply them will give you the | wrong answer. like playing a familiar game with the controls | reversed. | vwoolf wrote: | I'm sure there are children who unjustifiably cut off their | parents, and the reverse. I can say that I read _Adult Children | of Emotionally Immature Parents_ and it rocked my world: | https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/adult-children-of-emotional... | by thoroughly describing my upbringing. I've not cut off | contact but I have containerized it and set strict boundary | conditions, if you will, and my parents seem not to understand | their own behavior, at all. | quercusa wrote: | Ordering that one right away; it's taken me decades* to | figure out how my loving (AFAICT) parents set me up for | problems in personal relationships. | | * I may be slow in this regard. | honkycat wrote: | I am really glad I read this. DARVO "Deny, Attack, and Reverse | Victim and Offender" is something I have observed over and over | again. | | I've had to deal with abuse in my life in many forms, I suspect | many of us have. More times than not, it was in the workplace | dealing with a co-worker or boss. | | Around a year ago on twitter, people were freaking out about | "Bean Dad", a father who supposedly was abusing his daughter by | not opening a can of beans for her. An almost certainly fake | story missing a ton of context the father later gave[0]. I had a | tweet in reply: "If you think 'Bean Dad' is bad, wait until you | hear about 'Sports Dad' and "Grades Mom'." | | I had a CTO I really looked up to and got along with well, only | to later discover he was sexually harassing a woman at work, and | upon further reflection, the relationship was not as great as I | had thought as a young worker. I had an abusive business partner | once as well. I have an aunt who has anger issues was and HIGHLY | abusive in her language and actions, but thankfully after | standing up to her and having many conversations, she has greatly | improved her behavior. I was sexually abused by a family member | as a child. My parents were mildly abusive to me, but they aren't | bad people, they just didn't understand how to deal with my | untreated ADHD and psychological issues. | | I share this information not because I want you to break out a | violin for me, I am sincerely an extremely happy and productive | person. I have spent a long time processing and working through | these experiences, and I hope that maybe someone will read what I | have discovered about myself and be able to learn from my | experiences. | | All of this in my life has culminated in, and caused by, a | "broken asshole radar." I am very tolerant of people, and I try | to help them when I see them struggling. I'm used to being | abused, so like the frog in the pot, I don't detect the rising | temperature around me. This is my personality, so I have to | develop alternative strategies for protecting myself. | | I've had multiple "friendships" that I didn't realize were | problematic until I set boundaries and they absolutely melted | down. I have had two stalkers in my life. At this point, if | someone sets off my "crazy alert" I cut them off no contact, | because I struggle to notice when a relationship is becoming bad, | and I struggle to notice when a person is mentally unstable. | | The thing is: People SMELL this in me. Or maybe I invite it upon | myself through some tactical error in my behavior. Or maybe I am | instinctively shielding others from the abuse. I don't know. | | I know this about myself! And yet I still get myself into these | situations!! | | I am dealing with this at work currently. I am on a cross- | functional team with a co-worker who is going through some tough | times. I have heard they have had problems before, and have been | put on a PIP for behavioral reasons. I find myself doing this[1] | with them, correcting their behavior when they are rude to | someone, or myself. And it is always: "I didn't find that rude, I | don't see a problem..." The other day, I asked a vendor a simple | question, and to have the answer for the question at a demo | scheduled a few weeks out. This lead to co-worker blowing up at | me in the private team chat, basically for making a decision | without them ( to ask a question in an email ). It has also been | a constant struggle to get them to respect my | experience/expertise, and I often feel treated like a Jr. | engineer. | | All of the rudeness, and the meanness, and here is why my brain | is broken: I still feel bad for this person, and want to help | them! I think: "Hmm, is there a way I can communicate with them | to correct their bad behavior, but also not hurt their feelings?" | Or: "How can I write their review to help them improve?" Why am I | shielding this person? I don't have any idea. All it does is | cause me misery. | | And I guess that is why I am glad I read this article: It | reminded me that I cannot help them. My attempts at protecting | them from themselves isn't going to help them, it is only going | to hurt me, and make me a further target of their abuse and open | me up to DARVO. | | 0: If you are worried: His daughter had already had lunch, and | was not starving or distressed at any point. It was just funny | seeing her try and figure out the can opener. | | 1: "You can also train them by addressing each problem in the | moment. As soon as they do something wrong, you tell them what | they did and give them immediate consequences, like ending the | visit. Each time you do it they'll tantrum and spray abuse in all | directions ... It's like training a toddler, but without any hope | that the toddler will grow out of it. " | Terry_Roll wrote: | A problem I see with parents in general and not just personality | disorder types, which is reinforced by the state and scientists, | is this subconscious bias that kids are the property of their | parents. | | It needs to stop. | | Kids are like AI they learn from the environment around them and | prison populations are in part an example of the failed | parenting, state and scientific direction, but as usual State | officials and scientists never get held to account when they | should only the parent. | | Add in different belief systems and you have a recipe for | disaster which constantly unfurls to one degree or another day in | day out. ad nauseum. | | And all the while the planet still keeps being more and more over | populated. Its like fiddling at the seams whilst Rome burns. | Lammy wrote: | I was with you until that last part. Sorry I'm not really | willing to believe John D. Rockefeller III and co. could have | my best interest in mind when talking about how we should | maintain humanity under half a billion in perpetual balance | with nature. Sounds more like a world where they will own | everything and there will never be enough of "the rest of us" | to effectively demand equality | https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED050960.pdf#page=10 | Terry_Roll wrote: | Are you aware of | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink ? Clockwork | Orange, Rat Utopia as other examples? | | I dont care to a certain extent because it will end with war | OR sickness and poverty, if people are not forced to live | within their means and make the best of what they are given. | | I'd like to see euthanisia become legal so we dont have to be | experimented on by scientists who have the audacity to think | its acceptable, just like I dont agree with Govt who have the | audacity to think they can control our lives through | legislation and all that. | | In the 70's there was a Eugenicist movement in the West which | lost out to the current thinking, but here in the UK the NHS | was performing medical operations like tying the tubes of | woman after 1/2/3 kids to stop their from having more. | Obviously there is the female contraceptive pill which has | helped reduce number sizes. This is eye watering! https://en. | wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_the_most_c... https:// | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_the_most_c... | | You could say the Eugenicist movement has become more | persuasive today. We have also had to have our health | impaired to make us more docile and to reduce our breeding | abilities whilst also increasing the risk of cancer, to the | point that something like 50% of the UK population will get | cancer in their lifetime here in the UK. TF the NHS is free! | I bet Josef Mengele is kicking himself for being too obvious! | | Inflation is also stalking the planet right now, its getting | more expensive to live, now whilst various central banks can | print monkey tokens to keep the natives happy, inventing an | excuse or two to print more like Quantative Easing helps keep | people in the game and Govt's can invent bureaucracy to keep | people busier. | | I'm also aware that in the West its been cheaper to offshore | some jobs to parts of the world with lower labour costs. That | last point may or may not also entail poorer working | conditions like we see with Foxconn and Apple. | | Now its also clear that we have a form of global communism | imposed on us by global business giants under the guise of | global capitalism only its not a govt but a board doing the | communism bit limiting our choices of what we can spend money | on. What govt would want to distance themselves from domains | previously under their control like telecoms spying? | | But in all of this, there is a new entrant, artificial | intelligence, chipping away at the middle class jobs and some | working class manual labour jobs which has opened up a new | angle of attack that previously hadnt existed in human | history. | | Now its doing three things, its improving quality like we see | with robots building German cars and its also forcing Govt to | get creative with their bureaucracy which is why the security | services "hack" via these global entities with court orders. | Muddying the waters to keep us busy. Bread and Circuses been | going on since Roman times and all that. | | Its also discovering new attack vectors for all sorts of | areas of life, but its also undermining the pillars of | society authority namely the State and religion. | 77pt77 wrote: | > is this subconscious bias that kids are the property of their | parents. | | Nothing exemplifies this better than the cliche | | > I gave you life. I can take it away. | Terry_Roll wrote: | My point exactly, and not many kids have been in that | position, but I wonder how much of that is the States doing | and Scientists doing, considering the hubris of science. | | Take law, it can skew science, example driving whilst under | the influence of drink or drugs. How many people keep quiet | about driving whilst under the influence and thus the state, | the police, are legally able to exploit this falsehood to | justify their existence and skew the stats? | | Take Covid, you dont know if you have covid until you take a | test and then depending on what test you take, depends on the | false positives. The WHO or UN advised PCR tests were | multiplied less often last Xmas like from 30x down to 20x or | something like that. The Lateral Flow test is something like | 50% accurate!!! | | Here in the UK they had the "Pingdemic" where if you have the | COVID app on your smart phone, if you said you had symptoms | the app assumed you had COVID and told you to isolate. Now | this was a stealth form of economic harm because if you didnt | have covid but you tricked the COVID app into telling you to | isolate and then went near other people for like 3mins for | the bluetooth pinging to detect others, like in a busy | shopping centre you "gave" other people COVID and the law | abiding would have self isolated. | | Now how many businesses were affected by the | Govt's/Google's/Apple's incompetence? Is that not a law suit | in the making? :-) | | How many people lost money due to having to self isolate? | | And dont get me started on Religion. :-) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2021-12-28 23:00 UTC)