[HN Gopher] Tesla recalls nearly half a million Model 3 and Mode...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Tesla recalls nearly half a million Model 3 and Model S cars
        
       Author : turtlegrids
       Score  : 101 points
       Date   : 2021-12-30 21:05 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theverge.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theverge.com)
        
       | cassianoleal wrote:
       | Previous discussion:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29739029
        
       | etaioinshrdlu wrote:
       | It doesn't seem like the rear view camera problem is that much of
       | a safety issue, thoughts?
       | 
       | The front trunk flying open while driving seems highly
       | undesirable though.
        
         | antattack wrote:
         | Tesla's have limited rear-view visibility due to aerodynamic
         | shape. Not a big problem, but once you get used to backing out
         | while looking at HD screen, lack of it is quite a hindrance.
        
           | bfung wrote:
           | Yep - that's the first thing I noticed/get used to w/my Tesla
           | Y: rear view mirror looking out back windshield is basically
           | useless and camera is basically necessary while backing up.
        
             | twblalock wrote:
             | The Model Y would be pretty much undrivable without a
             | camera. The Model 3 is also pretty bad about rear
             | visibility, but the lack of visibility out the back of the
             | Model Y is shocking.
        
         | chrisseaton wrote:
         | Mandatory safety feature not working not a safety issue? How do
         | you work that one out?
        
         | dmonitor wrote:
         | federal regulation requires backup cameras on new vehicles, so
         | that breaking likely to break would be probably be considered a
         | decent sized problem
        
         | m-ee wrote:
         | Rear view cameras are a required safety feature in the US now.
         | As SUVs proliferated and pillars got thicker for crash safety
         | cases of parents running over their toddlers increased.
        
           | walrus01 wrote:
           | as predicted in the early 1990s
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI_Jl5WFQkA
        
           | coryrc wrote:
        
             | karatinversion wrote:
             | Those generally aren't the places where the SUVs are being
             | reversed.
        
             | ralph84 wrote:
             | Those spaces exist but in general people with kids don't
             | want to live there.
        
           | xiphias2 wrote:
           | You're right, but it can still be fixed after the problem
           | happens
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | The rearview camera is a big issue because it is a requirement
         | under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | Yes. It's a safety issue. But there are also at least tens of
           | millions of cars on the road without backup cameras.
        
             | alamortsubite wrote:
             | Lack of rear visibility without a camera is a much more of
             | an issue on newer cars; older cars, which make up the bulk
             | of those "tens of millions", don't have such a serious
             | problem.
        
             | kube-system wrote:
             | I'm not (directly) saying it's a safety issue, I'm saying
             | it's a compliance issue. It is clear that it needs fixed
             | because it's clear that this function is required by law.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | Of course it needs to be fixed.
        
         | actually_a_dog wrote:
         | I had a hood come open on a car I was driving once. It was
         | definitely some scary shit. Luckily, I was on a long, straight
         | road, and was able to decelerate in a controlled way and pull
         | off the side of the road.
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | see also: Tesla ranks almost dead last on Consumer Reports
       | reliability list
       | 
       | https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/Tesla-ranks-almost-dead-...
       | 
       | https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/tesla-model-s-no-longer-reco...
       | 
       | I hope this doesn't come across as excessively smug but I think
       | my life, level of stress and personal finances are measurably
       | improved by owning something that is closer to a $9000 Toyota
       | Corolla and spending money on regular, basic maintenance for it.
        
         | noah_buddy wrote:
         | Presuming you can afford a Tesla, the virtues of thriftiness
         | and limiting the scope of your consumption will get you much
         | further than "FSD".
        
         | tragictrash wrote:
        
         | LanceJones wrote:
         | They also ranks first in customer satisfaction survey -- 4
         | years running:
         | 
         | https://thedriven.io/2021/11/15/tesla-dominate-top-10-most-s...
        
           | woodruffw wrote:
           | Consumers tend to rate higher satisfactions with "luxury"
           | goods (i.e., goods at premium prices, regardless of material
           | quality or value) than they do with non-luxury goods. It
           | occurs to me that that bias affects Tesla's reception as
           | well.
        
             | bumby wrote:
             | I vaguely remember (or perhaps misremember) Mercedes doing
             | a study that consumers respond less favorably to their cars
             | when they are pierced below some threshold compared to the
             | same cars when prices higher. There's definitely some
             | consumer cognitive bias effects around pricing
        
             | ALittleLight wrote:
             | Presumably the survey includes other luxury cars.
        
           | tragictrash wrote:
           | From that article: "Consumer Reports explained that despite
           | "historic reliability concerns", Tesla had an intensely loyal
           | following and took the top spot."
           | 
           | Do you happen to be one of those fiercly loyal followers?
        
           | carlhjerpe wrote:
        
           | kube-system wrote:
           | This pattern is more of the norm than not for expensive high-
           | tech cars. Rich people like nice stuff and are willing to pay
           | maintenance and repair bills.
        
             | walrus01 wrote:
             | and then later in their life they become impossible to fix
             | at a reasonable price.
             | 
             | somebody might sell you a mostly okay running older BMW 7
             | series for $4500, fully loaded with all the options but
             | take a look at the parts and labor cost to fix something on
             | it.... you might as well throw away the whole car.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | While I've driven them (on a track) and appreciate the
               | attraction of the German sports luxury brands, what I've
               | always heard is that if you want to keep them past their
               | warranty period you need a trusted independent foreign
               | car mechanic--and it can still get pricey. Just has never
               | been a sufficient priority for me.
        
             | LanceJones wrote:
             | Since you're making broad, sweeping generalizations, I can
             | play. There are 7 people in my social circle who are Tesla
             | owners but not fiercely loyal. They are not rich. And none
             | of them have experienced more than minor issues in their
             | ownership.
        
               | matsemann wrote:
               | If you own a Tesla you're almost by definition rich. If
               | everyone in your social circle is driving expensive/new
               | cars, you're all rich. Not to go all "check your
               | privileges", but seriously..
        
               | bumby wrote:
               | The real comparison is whether they would've experienced
               | complaints with _any_ similar class of new(ish) car.
               | What's left out of TSLA reliability talk is that they are
               | often compared to the average car, which is much older,
               | has less safety features etc. That's why consumer reports
               | compares similar class and year
        
               | kube-system wrote:
               | They are "not rich" in only the most privileged of
               | perspectives. Even if we limit that perspective to the
               | US, which is a pretty wealthy country by most measures:
               | the average vehicle on the road in the US was built
               | before Tesla even opened their first assembly plant. The
               | used car market in the US is 2.8x the size of the new car
               | market. Median income buyers struggle to afford new cars
               | of any fuel type or brand.
        
         | ericmay wrote:
         | I see this all the time but then if you want to buy a new Tesla
         | you have to wait a year. And that _is_ due to demand.
         | 
         | The consumer reports reliability thing just seems like a meme
         | at this point that doesn't ring true for most people either in
         | importance or reality. I can't quite put my finger on why this
         | meme is wrong but my intuition says it is.
        
           | thr0wawayf00 wrote:
           | > I see this all the time but then if you want to buy a new
           | Tesla you have to wait a year. And that is due to demand.
           | 
           | High demand doesn't mean the product is quality. Fyre
           | festival sold thousands of tickets, even though it was
           | fundamentally fraudulent. Video games are another perfect
           | example: fans pre-order AAA titles that studios fail to
           | deliver over and over and over again. Demand just means that
           | people like the idea of it, not that the product actually
           | delivers on its stated promises.
        
             | walrus01 wrote:
             | > Video games are another perfect example: fans pre-order
             | AAA titles that studios fail to deliver over and over and
             | over again
             | 
             | I literally pre-ordered Anthem, and then apparently having
             | not learned my lesson, did the same with Cyberpunk 2077.
             | Enough said...
        
           | oogali wrote:
           | There's nothing to put a finger on and no meme rebuttal
           | needed, because both statements can be true.
           | 
           | Tesla can score poorly in 3rd party consumer testing and that
           | might be a valuable data point to those who care or value
           | their testing.
           | 
           | And a number of people who really want a Tesla can also be
           | people who have never heard of Consumer Reports nor value its
           | testing.
           | 
           | At current domestic capacity levels, you need 500K people in
           | category number two ahead of your order to produce the
           | observed lead times.
        
           | bumby wrote:
           | > _The consumer reports reliability thing just seems like a
           | meme at this point that doesn't ring true for most people
           | either in importance or reality._
           | 
           | It's based on, well...consumer reports of reliability issues
           | so it seems like it's quite literally based on (perceived)
           | reality.
        
           | toomuchtodo wrote:
           | Have bought several Teslas over the last 3 years (S->X->Y).
           | Quality improves each time I've bought one. Lots to complain
           | about, still wouldn't buy from another manufacturer.
        
             | HWR_14 wrote:
             | If there is a lot to complain about, why wouldn't you want
             | to buy something else?
        
               | toomuchtodo wrote:
               | Because the alternatives are worse. Bolt EV LG Chem
               | battery recall, Taycan is woefully inadequate for the
               | price point, Ford dealers are adding $10k-$30k "market
               | adjustments" to Mach Es and $5k-$10k for F150 Lightning
               | reservations (which is _obnoxious_ ), Teslas have the
               | Supercharger network, frequent over the air updates, a
               | robust battery warranty, strong resale market, etc.
               | 
               | My Model S frunk recall appointment with a mobile tech
               | coming to the home to perform took less than three
               | minutes in app to schedule.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | Tesla has bumped the price of their vehicles _at least_
               | three times this year, in some cases well over $10K in
               | total, so it's not all that much different to "market
               | adjustments".
               | 
               | Not sure how a $5K refundable deposit is "obnoxious".
               | Sure, it's less convenient than the Tesla deposit, but it
               | wasn't like that money wasn't earmarked anyway. (And if
               | you're in the market for a $50-75K vehicle and the
               | difference between a couple of hundred and couple of
               | thousand down is a deal breaker for you, you could argue
               | affordability).
        
               | toomuchtodo wrote:
               | The manufacturer bumping the price due to demand and
               | supply chain issues is one thing, dealers gouging is
               | entirely different. Musk was entirely right that dealers
               | would be an impediment to EV adoption.
               | 
               | https://jalopnik.com/dealers-say-salespeople-still-arent-
               | rea...
               | 
               | https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a15346108/some-
               | dealerships...
               | 
               | https://www.fastcompany.com/90294305/car-companies-put-
               | in-a-...
               | 
               | Edit: @FireBeyond I don't believe I'll be able to help
               | with the confusion
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | And yet, somehow, all the other manufacturers are not
               | bumping the price at wholesale.
               | 
               | I'm confused.
        
               | jonathankoren wrote:
               | That's funny. I'd buy a Taycan but never a Model S.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | And some of us buy cars and keep them for over 10 years.
             | Which isn't rare behavior.
        
           | JohnJamesRambo wrote:
           | I haven't had a single problem with my Tesla so this seems
           | odd to me. I know that is a sample size of one but I would
           | expect some issue.
        
         | donarb wrote:
         | Instead of Consumer Reports, how about JD Power? Every car
         | company that brags about ratings quotes their JD Power rating
         | first and foremost. Tesla is 30 out of 33 on JD Power.
        
       | 77pt77 wrote:
       | How much will the stock rise as a consequence of this?
        
       | onphonenow wrote:
       | The rear camera MAY fail issue seems pretty benign.
       | 
       | When it fails go get it fixed?
       | 
       | Or is that no longer a permitted approach.
       | 
       | These recalls used to be for things major. Now we are getting a
       | recall over what would be a warranty claim? Can they not just
       | extend warranty coverage in this year to something like 10 years?
        
       | deviantbit wrote:
       | In the small community I live, we have at least one Tesla catch
       | fire a year. There were three last year. I'm not sure what
       | quality control issues they're having, but it seems they would
       | get the fire issue fixed. Before you down vote this, which I see
       | the Tesla fanboys are doing, Google Tesla fire. I never remember
       | a gas vehicle igniting spontaneously as electric cars do.
        
         | bagels wrote:
         | Battery car fires are much more likely to make it in to the
         | news than your every day combustion engine vehicle fire which
         | are far more numerous.
        
       | slg wrote:
       | Just a reminder that cars are recalled all the time and the only
       | reason you are seeing this article is because it is Tesla. Any
       | other manufacturer and this would be a non-story especially on
       | HN.
       | 
       | Did Ford recalling 185k vehicles a couple days ago make the front
       | page of HN?
       | 
       | How about Toyota recalling 200k vehicles also a couple days
       | ago?[2]
       | 
       | Maybe Honda recalling 725k vehicles a month ago?[3]
       | 
       | EDIT: Lots of people are taking this a defending of Tesla. That
       | isn't my intention here. I am providing context to this issue.
       | Someone who isn't familiar with the frequency that cars are
       | voluntarily recalled is going to conclude that this is a bigger
       | deal than if viewed in the context of the auto industry as a
       | whole.
       | 
       | [1] -
       | https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/ford/2021/1...
       | 
       | [2] - https://www.justicepays.com/news/toyota-recalls-
       | over-200000-...
       | 
       | [3] - https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a38425033/honda-
       | passport-p...
        
         | serf wrote:
         | just a reminder that product recalls (especially vehicles) are
         | discussed all the time on HN [0], and Tesla isn't somehow
         | special for being mentioned here.
         | 
         | [0]: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=recall
        
           | slg wrote:
           | None of the recalls I pointed to were discussed here. Here is
           | one example of searching for another manufacturer.[1] Three
           | articles including a pair of duplicates. The other article is
           | 12 years old. They seemingly combined to receive 2 upvotes
           | and 0 comments. Meanwhile this article already has over 50
           | upvotes in an hour with 25+ comments. We can't pretend that
           | this community treats all of these issues the same regardless
           | of manufacturer.
           | 
           | [1] - https://hn.algolia.com/?q=recall+honda
        
         | carlhjerpe wrote:
         | There's more to the story. Ford, Toyota and Honda makes
         | significantly more cars and models than Tesla.
        
           | slg wrote:
           | I am not trying to start a fight about the quality of Tesla's
           | vehicles compared to other manufacturers. Maybe you are right
           | and Teslas are recalled at a higher frequency. I don't know
           | enough about it to have an opinion either way.
           | 
           | I am simply pointing out that a solitary voluntary recall,
           | which is what this article is about, is barely newsworthy and
           | is only being posted/upvoted because it is Tesla.
        
             | carlhjerpe wrote:
             | And it is upvoted through the roof because it is Tesla. The
             | one car manufacturer valued as high as "all other" (very
             | many) car manufacturers together. Tesla is different, why
             | treat them like everyone else?
        
               | slg wrote:
               | >And it is upvoted through the roof because it is Tesla.
               | 
               | That was my point so we agree.
        
               | carlhjerpe wrote:
               | Well yes, but you seem to think it's unfair treatment
               | whereas I think It's perfectly reasonable to treat them
               | differently if they are different(Which they are). So we
               | disagree as well.
        
               | slg wrote:
               | I never said it was unfair. People are projecting a lot
               | onto my comments here.
        
         | tyrfing wrote:
         | This is unnecessarily defensive. A quick search shows that
         | other large recalls have been heavily upvoted on HN:
         | Volkswagen, Hyundai, Fiat, Peloton, Amazon, and many others.
         | 
         | Just a reminder that news about the 6th-largest company in the
         | world, owned by the richest man in the world, isn't a personal
         | attack on you.
        
           | slg wrote:
           | Not all recalls have the same level of newsworthiness.
           | 
           | Both the Volkswagen and Hyundai recalls were related to
           | internal corruption and potential criminal activity making
           | them more noteworthy. That is a failure in the regulatory
           | system while Tesla's recall is the system working as
           | intended.
           | 
           | The Fiat recall was related to hacking so it will naturally
           | get more interest on HN.
           | 
           | I don't have data on this, but voluntary recalls seem to be
           | much more common for cars than other retail products.
        
         | bumby wrote:
         | What makes this more interesting to me is that is came about
         | during a probe into the driver assist technology. This
         | particular recall is of less interest than that probe.
         | 
         | https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-...
        
         | noah_buddy wrote:
         | I disagree that those headlines are even nearly so newsworthy!
         | This Tesla recall is only 20k less than all that they sold in
         | 2020. Ford recalling 200k cars is only 5% of what they sold in
         | that same year.
         | 
         | This is a relatively large proportion of all Tesla's on the
         | road.
        
           | mxschumacher wrote:
           | it's interesting how Tesla is definitely not a car company
           | when somebody mentions their absurd valuation but just like
           | all the other car companies when something goes bad. Cannot
           | have it both ways.
           | 
           | I have read about Toyota's impressive production systems and
           | then hear people claiming that Tesla's manufacturing
           | capability is 10x better than anybody else's.
           | 
           | At some point we'll have to decide whether looking like a
           | duck, swimming like a duck, and quacking like a duck makes it
           | a duck.
        
           | atwebb wrote:
           | That was my thinking, a major supplier / manufacturer
           | recalling a year of (and 1/4 of all ever made) products is at
           | least interesting. To OP's point though, it likely reached
           | the front page so fast b/c it has Tesla in the name.
        
           | slg wrote:
           | You can check this link[1] which I posted in another reply.
           | There is a story there about Honda recalling 1.4m vehicles.
           | That is right around a full year of sales in the US and
           | exceeds annual sales for the last couple years[2]. That story
           | got one upvote and zero comments when it was posted here last
           | year.
           | 
           | Once again, I am not trying to excuse Tesla for quality
           | issues or say they make as good or a better quality car than
           | any other manufacturer. I am simply pointing out that the
           | name Tesla drives attention and clicks compared to their
           | competitors and that is why you are seeing this story.
           | 
           | [1] - https://hn.algolia.com/?q=recall+honda
           | 
           | [2] - https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/honda-us-sales-figures/
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | Ford simply sells a much wider variety of cars which results
           | in more frequent recalls. The odds of any one recall
           | impacting a ford owner is less, but the odds of any recall
           | impacting them are about the same.
           | 
           | For example in the recent 16 million for airbags vehicle
           | recall across multiple car manufactures only 3 ford models
           | where impacted. https://oharelawfirm.com/blog/massive-car-
           | recall-reveals-pot...
        
         | standardUser wrote:
         | One key difference is that for Tesla, 500k cars is a _huge_
         | amount of the total cars it 's sold in the last 5 years. More
         | than a third. Has any automaker ever had a recall on such a
         | huge proportion of their cars?
        
           | vardump wrote:
           | Tesla has sold about 1.4M cars in just last two years. 500k
           | last year and 910k (likely more) this year.
           | 
           | Next year Tesla is going to sell probably at least 1.5M cars.
           | Given they have two new factories, and Tesla Shanghai factory
           | is expanding again, 2M wouldn't surprise me.
        
         | bestcoder69 wrote:
         | I don't get who you're calling out here. The upvoters? The
         | press? Other car companies for not being as good at generating
         | hype? Who messed up (other than Tesla)?
         | 
         | If you're just raising awareness that HN finds Tesla articles
         | interesting... that's fine I guess.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | If we have to hear about it every time Tesla is the best-
         | selling brand for a single month in Estonia or Chile, but we
         | never get to talk about all the other months and places some
         | other brand is the top seller, it follows that we also have to
         | talk about Tesla recalls, even though we never talk about Honda
         | recalls.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-30 23:00 UTC)