[HN Gopher] Preliminary analysis of the Hayabusa2 samples return... ___________________________________________________________________ Preliminary analysis of the Hayabusa2 samples returned from asteroid Ryugu Author : robin_reala Score : 102 points Date : 2022-01-02 16:25 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.nature.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com) | bubblehack3r wrote: | Tl;dr? | adolph wrote: | Picture is here (from last year): | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-021-01585-9 | | Looks a little like coffee grounds in a grinder, only if you | ground charcoal. | herodotus wrote: | As far as I can tell: (1) Yes indeed, the composition of the | samples was not degraded when they were collected and returned | to earth. (2) The samples indicate that Ryugu is similar to Cl | chondrites (break up easily when entering earth, therefore only | small fragments collected on earth; rich in volatile elements, | representative of the chemical composition of our solar system) | BUT Ryugu is less reflective, more porous and more fragile even | than Cl chondrites. | | Therefore (in my non-expert opinion): well worth the effort to | collect and study because we will never find anything similar | from a Meteor so these samples will give us much more evidence | about the solar system's chemical composition. | robin_reala wrote: | In scientific papers the bit headed Abstract is basically the | tl;dr, you can skip the rest. | ncmncm wrote: | In typical papers, what the abstract says contradicts what | the graphs say, and what the conclusion says; and the graphs | contradict the conclusion. | | Papers where they all match are exceptional and precious. But | we cannot trust that just any paper is among them, even those | published in Nature. | z3t4 wrote: | It's fascinating that the death of a star can bring life. | Basically when a star dies there will be a lot of carbon, oxygen | and hydrogen - the building blocks for life, and there are a lot | of dead star remains floating around in space. It's almost like | if the whole big bang process was made in order to create life. | pault wrote: | Maybe life is just an efficient way to increase entropy and | thus it will arise wherever the requisite conditions are | available. | tgv wrote: | I think the phrase "on-asteroid measurements" can already lay | claim to the title "concise understatement of the year". | gitgrump wrote: | Seriously. Humans managed to send a robot to a rock hurtling | through the universe, and then took pieces back to look at. And | it feels so normal! This is awesome stuff. | ianai wrote: | As someone keyed into this stuff, it doesn't feel so normal | to me. Feels pretty momentous! | gitgrump wrote: | Oh, momentous for sure! I guess I meant that it's not | surprising that we were able to do it successfully. "What, | like it's hard?" vibes. :) | pmayrgundter wrote: | Just reading up on Hayabusa and Hayabusa2, and the NASA's OSIRIS- | REx. They all targeted large (~1km) Apollo group asteroids | (Itokawa, Ryugu, Bennu respectively). | | The asteroid that has had the highest probability of collision | with Earth (1950 DA) was also an ~1km Apollo group asteroid, and | Apollo asteroids are the source of almost all of the known | Potentially Hazardous Objects for Earth. | | The stated objectives for these missions is basic science, such | as understanding the proto-planetary conditions of our solar | system. That makes sense and also near-Earth asteroids are | practical targets for missions! | | But it seems likely to me that someone is also building profiles | for interception, should we need it. So it's curious that hazard | profiling isn't mentioned in the objectives for these missions | (not that I can find.. correction appreciated!) That makes me | wonder if there's something else out there not being talked | about. And Osiris Rex would be King God of the Dead... _shrug_ , | nothing to see here ;) | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayabusa | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayabusa2 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSIRIS-REx | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_asteroid | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/25143_Itokawa | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/162173_Ryugu | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/101955_Bennu | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(29075)_1950_DA | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentially_hazardous_object#L... | https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/PHACloseApp.html | https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/snews/2006/0602.shtml | czbond wrote: | We'd better figure out Apophis in the next 100 years... | [deleted] | CrazyCatDog wrote: | I found the bit about whether the samples may have been altered | in final transit interesting as well as the artificial crater | created by landing--the rest, per my layman eye, is effectively | reporting means, nothing interesting yet... | rurban wrote: | I find it extremely interesting that all remote sensing | analysis was confirmed by onsite analysis. That means we can | trust our remote sensing capabilities. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-02 23:00 UTC)